Canada's Digital Health Workforce: The Role of Innovation, Research and Policy.

The rapid growth of digital health and use of technology has led to an increased demand for qualified professionals in the areas of health informatics (HI) and health information management (HIM). This is reflected by the growth in the number of educational programs and graduates in these areas. However, to develop a culture of digital health innovation in Canada, the role of research needs to be critically examined. In this paper we discuss some of these issues around the relation between research and innovation, and the development of an innovation culture in health informatics, health information management and digital health in Canada. Recommendations for facilitating this development in terms of funding, granting and policy are also explored.

A case for the health welfare of Texans-A nurse practitioner state regulation policy analysis.

ABSTRACT: Restrictive nurse practitioner (NP) practice regulation at the state level continues to obstruct patient access to quality affordable care because primary care provider shortages heighten across the nation. Evidence-based research supports NPs as cost-effective providers without conceding quality of care. A patchwork of highly variable state policies subjectively determines the degree of collaborative oversight required for NPs to practice in each state. An objective review of policies influencing NP capacity to deliver care promotes evidence-informed policy adaptation. A policy analysis was completed using Bardach and Patashnik's framework to evaluate policy options for NP practice regulation in Texas. Full practice authority (FPA) policy effect was quantitively evaluated through difference-in-differences regression models using selected measures of all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Health welfare outcomes were calculated using emergency department utilization, average household health expenditures, poor physical health days, and NP-specific adverse action reports (AAR). Overall, FPA policy did not have a statistically significant effect on state-clustered emergency department utilization, average household health expenditures, or poor physical health days. Full practice authority was associated with decreased NP AAR. The analysis supports FPA as a viable policy option for states such as Texas and counters claims FPA policy adoption results in detrimental sequalae in the health of the population.

Forging a Social Movement to Dismantle Entrenched Power and Liberate Primary Care as a Common Good.

The state of family medicine and primary care in the United States is precarious, afflicted by chronic underinvestment. Family physicians and their allies should not expect different policy outcomes without adopting a different theory of change and tactical approach to reform. I argue: (1) high-quality primary care is a common good, as asserted by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; (2) a market-based health system captured by extractive capitalism is inimical to primary care as a common good; (3) professionalism has both aided and constrained family physicians as agents of change for primary care as a common good; and, (4) to actualize primary care as a common good, family physicians must embrace "counterculture professionalism" to join with patients, primary care workers, and other allies in a social movement demanding fundamental restructuring of the health system and democratization of health that takes power back from interests profiting from the status quo and reorients the system to one grounded in healing relationships in primary care. This restructuring should take the form of a publicly financed system of universal coverage for direct primary care, with a minimum of 10% of total US health spending allocated to Primary Care for All.

History of Health Policy: Explaining Complexity through Time.

History can be a powerful tool for teaching health policy. Particularly in the United States, with its complex system of public and private payers and providers of health services, understanding the historical origins of policies, programs, and institutions makes the system's contours legible. Historical analysis may also help health care providers to navigate this system and to advocate for changes within it. The US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) have curricular standards for students to understand specific aspects of health policy and "systems-based practice," and historians working within the curricular structures of US medical education may find reference to these standards useful in explaining and justifying their role in preparing medical students and resident physicians for practice. This paper explores some examples of how to use history to teach health professions students about the historical development of the US health care system, the constraints that defined how it came to be, and possibilities for reform.

Georgia: moving from policy to actions to strengthen primary health care: primary health care policy paper series

The COVID-19 pandemic has proven that high-performing and accessible primary health care (PHC) is vital to build back better. Georgia is committed to improving the health of the population and increasing the efficiency of health services delivery by strengthening PHC. This publication from Primary health care policy paper series focuses on Georgia, with the aim of describing the current challenges facing PHC and providing pragmatic policy options for transitioning to a more community-oriented model. A new model of PHC should aim to be more responsive to the needs and expectations of the population and attractive to physicians and patients, especially in rural areas of Georgia. Shifting away from heavy reliance on costly specialist and inpatient services towards the greater utilization of integrated PHC services is no easy task. This requires new approaches to delivering PHC services and aligning health system enablers that support PHC providers as the first point of contact and coordinator of care. To do this, the publication details seven entry points for strengthening the PHC model of care and five policy levers for sustaining the transformation needed.

An Analysis and Review of the Use of State Legislator Clinical Site Visits to Increase Advocacy for Nurse Anesthesiologists.

Nurse anesthesiologists have successfully influenced legislative change to include full practice authority across the United States. These legislative changes directly impact the scope of practice as well as patient care and the advancement of the nursing profession. However, nurse anesthesiologists remain hesitant to embrace health policy advocacy as a professional responsibility. To act as advocates, awareness must exist around professional responsibility to engage in political advocacy, and how to engage in this role. We describe successful statewide strategies involving members of a professional state organization for nurse anesthesiologists. Leaders from the state organization incorporated clinical site visits to create a shared vision and inform legislators about their role and its influence on providing safe, quality, cost-effective care to patients. These efforts were effective in moving the policy agenda forward. Additionally, this process of educating legislators within the hospital has empowered a new generation of nurse anesthesiology advocates.

Health Care During Incarceration: A Policy Position Paper From the American College of Physicians.

The American College of Physicians (ACP) has a long-standing commitment to improving the health of all Americans and opposes any form of discrimination in the delivery of health care services. ACP is committed to working toward fully understanding and supporting the unique needs of the incarcerated population and eliminating health disparities for these persons. In this position paper, ACP offers recommendations to policymakers and administrators to improve the health and well-being of persons incarcerated in adult correctional facilities.

Categorizing national caregiver recommendations to support family caregivers and address unmet needs.

BACKGROUND: Recognizing family caregivers as vital providers of long-term assistance to loved ones with chronic illness, several national organizations developed recommendations to improve support for family caregivers. PURPOSE: This article categorizes these recommendations to advance family-centered nursing practice, develop health policies, and advocate for family caregiver support. METHODS: Six reports of caregiver recommendations published in the United States from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed using thematic analysis. FINDINGS: The 108 recommendations were organized into five categories: policy; caregiver assessment and support; health professional practices; public awareness; advance care planning. DISCUSSION: Ensuring economic security, establishing a national data collection strategy, addressing caregivers' diverse needs, improving access to health care and support services, and increasing public awareness were highlighted. CONCLUSION: The recommendations provide a roadmap for nurses at all levels of practice to advocate for a national agenda to develop, fund, and implement inclusive health care policies and interventions to address unmet caregiver needs and maximize support.

American health workforce policy and PAs: A brief history.

ABSTRACT: Health workforce policy in the United States from the mid-1970s has been strongly influenced by perceptions of the adequacy of the physician supply and its relationship to physician assistants/associates (PAs) and NPs. During the 1980s, a series of inaccurate reports by the federal government mistakenly warned of an impending physician surplus and shaped policy decisions for decades. In spite of perceptions of a physician surplus, the PA profession expanded rapidly in the 1990s. Projections of the adequacy of the physician supply changed to a shortage in the first decade of this century and the PA component of the healthcare workforce continued to expand. During the past decade, the Association of American Medical Colleges has employed microsimulation modeling expertise to project the extent of physician shortages, an effort that initially failed to incorporate the contributions of PAs and NPs in the workforce. Although current projection models include the contributions of PAs and NPs, the substitution ratios used are notably low. Specifically, PA and NP productivity effort was set roughly at one-quarter to one-half that of the physician. PAs and NPs make up a substantial contingent within the US healthcare workforce and should be included fully in future workforce projection estimates. This article provides policy recommendations for the advancement of PA contributions to the delivery of medical care.

Climate Change, Public Health, Health Policy, and Nurses Training.

There are few educational programs in the United States that have a primary focus on preparing nurses to engage in all levels of public health, health policy, and climate change. The United Nations sustainability development goals (SDG) and the Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity (2021) report underscored the importance of key stakeholders, including nurses, engaging in advocacy and policy to promote health equity. We discuss the role of nursing at the intersection of public health, policy, climate change, and the SDG. We also discuss the history and merger of the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of Nursing public health and health policy specialties, a significant innovation in our effort to promote health equity. We provide a brief overview of the redesigning of our curriculum that meets the needs of today's learners by including content on climate change, data analytics, and racial, social, and environmental justice. Finally, we emphasize the need to train the next cadre of nurses interested in careers in public health and health policy for us to meet the challenges facing our communities. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S3):S321-S327. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306826).

The Growing Imperative for Patient and Caregiver Partnership.

This special edition of Healthcare Quarterly (HQ) has been developed through a novel partnership between the Ontario Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) SUPPORT Unit (OSSU) and Longwoods Publishing. The concept for this edition emerged from an alignment of interests between the partners. OSSU's mandate is to support patient-oriented health and health services research in Ontario and to facilitate the uptake of research evidence to improve health policy and decision making. HQ's mission is to recognize, nurture and champion excellence in the Canadian healthcare system by sharing leading practices in health services delivery and policy development. As we look toward the future of healthcare and health system transformation, leading practices will be increasingly defined by the degree to which they are designed and implemented in full partnership with patients and caregivers. This perspective, shared by both OSSU and Longwoods, is at the heart of this publication.

Government policies targeting primary care physician practice from 1998-2018 in three Canadian provinces: A jurisdictional scan.

Primary care is the foundation of health care systems around the world. Physician autonomy means that governments rely on a limited selection of levers to implement reforms in primary care delivery, and these policies may impact the practice choices, intentions, and patterns of primary care physicians. Using a systematic search strategy to capture publicly available policy documents, we conducted a scan of such policies from 1998 to 2018 in three Canadian provinces: British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Ontario. We reviewed 388 documents and extracted 170 policies from their texts, followed by analysis of the policies' instruments, actors, and topic areas. Policy reforms across the three provinces were primarily focused on physician payment, with governments relying on both targeted incentives and reformed payment models. Policies also employed various instruments to target priority areas of practice: 24/7 access to care, team-based primary care, unattached patients, eHealth, and rural/Northern recruitment of physicians. Across the three provinces and the 20-year timespan, reform priorities and instruments were largely uniform, with Ontario's policies tending to be the most diverse. Physicians helped shape reforms through the agreements negotiated between provincial governments and medical associations, influencing the topics and timing of reforms. Future research should evaluate impacts on the delivery of primary care and explore opportunities for policy innovation.

How Can Anesthesiologists Influence Policymaking? Reflections from a Year at the Council of Economic Advisers.

From September 2019 to August 2020, the author served as a senior economist on the Council of Economic Advisers, a government agency charged with providing economic analysis and advice to the President of the United States and senior government officials. Working with the Council yielded many useful lessons on how anesthesiologists can influence healthcare policy. First, because the President has wide latitude over many areas of health policy that directly impact patient care and anesthesiologists' working environment, anesthesiologists should focus their efforts on influencing policymakers within the executive branch of government in addition to influencing lawmakers. Second, policymakers are busy and typically do not have a technical background, so anesthesiologists must learn how to communicate with them succinctly and at an appropriate level. Finally, because policymakers often need analysis quickly, anesthesiologists must meet these needs even if the underlying analysis is rougher and less precise that what would normally be needed for peer review.

Child Protective Services Guidelines for Substantiating Exposure to Domestic Violence as Maltreatment and Assigning Caregiver Responsibility: Policy Analysis and Recommendations.

The purpose of this study was to examine the range of policy approaches used by child welfare systems in the United States to guide workers in classifying and substantiating child exposure to domestic violence (CEDV) as an actionable form of maltreatment. To that end, we conducted a qualitative document analysis of child protective services (CPS) policy manuals from all state-administered child welfare systems in the U.S. (N = 41). Our findings indicate that a majority of state-administered systems (71%) have adopted policy requiring workers to demonstrate that children have endured harm or the threat of harm before substantiating CEDV-related maltreatment. Many state systems (51%) also include policy directives that require workers to identify a primary aggressor during CPS investigations involving CEDV, while far fewer (37%) provide language that potentially exonerates survivors of domestic violence from being held accountable for failure to protect on the basis of their own victimization. Based on our findings and identification of policy exemplars, we offer a recommended set of quality policy indicators for states to consider in the formulation of their policy guidelines for substantiating children's exposure to domestic violence that promotes the safety and wellbeing of both children and adult survivors of domestic violence.

Commentary: Improving the Sustainability of Healthcare in Canada through Physician-Engaged Delivery System Reforms.

Increasing private healthcare financing has been suggested as a solution toward improving healthcare quality and access within the Canadian healthcare system. However, Lee et al. (2021) find no evidence that increasing private financing would address the challenges faced by Canadian healthcare. We suggest turning our focus away from reforms that solely increase private healthcare financing and toward evidence-based delivery-system reforms to address both quality and sustainability. We present examples and supporting evidence of the effectiveness of patient-, physician-, organization- and system-level strategies. Changes should engage physicians and be implemented across Canada to facilitate a cultural shift toward experimentation and high-value care delivery.

Advocacy to Government and Stakeholders.

Participation in the health care and government advocacy arena may represent new and challenging perspectives for the traditional neurosurgeon. However, those with a strong understanding of the laws, rules, regulations, and fiscal allocation process can directly influence the practice of neurosurgery in the United States. We seek to shine light on the black box of how health care laws are passed, the influence and techniques of lobbying, and the role and rules surrounding political action committees. This practical review of health care advocacy is supplemented by a blueprint for engagement in the political arena for the practicing neurosurgeon.