Diagnostic properties of sensitivity changes in patients with maxillofacial fractures: a systematic review

Aim: Verify the accuracy of objective assessments compared to subjective tests in detecting changes in somatosensory perception in individuals affected by maxillofacial trauma. Methods: The review (PROSPERO n ° CRD42019125546) used the databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, LILACS and other bibliographic resources. Prospective and retrospective studies that used objective and subjective methods of assessing facial sensitivity in maxillofacial fractures were included. There was no restriction on language or publication date. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2. Data extraction and analysis were performed using a form developed for the study. Results: 21 studies were included. The clinical objective examination mainly includes assessments of: tactile sensitivity (95.24%) and nociceptive sensitivity (57.14%). The subjective assessment was based on the patient's report, spontaneously (61.90%), guided by structured questionnaires (33.33%) and/or using scales (9.52%) to measure the degree of impairment. In risk of bias assessment, were observed no adequate interpretation and classification of changes in subjective sensitivity, subject to inappropriate analysis of the data. In addition, the studies bring several instruments without standardization for assessing sensory modalities. Conclusion: The objective assessment is a complement to the subjective assessment, using the touch assessment as the main parameter in the profile of the facial peripheral integrity, associated or not with nociceptive assessment. Lack of consensus on the indication of specific instruments for testing is a limiting factor. Thus, based on the studies, is proposed a minimum battery of sensitivity assessment to obtain an overview of the patient's peripheral nervous situation

Técnicas de transposição/lateralização do nervo alveolar inferior ­ uma revisão da literatura sobre o déficit neurossensorial e a taxa de sucesso dos implantes dentários / Transposition/lateralization techniques for the inferior alveolar nerve ­ a literature review on the neurosensorial and dental implant success rates

Objetivo: comparar as técnicas de lateralização (LNAI) e transposição do nervo alveolar inferior (TNAI) com a taxa de disfunção neurossensorial, bem como a taxa de sucesso dos implantes dentários. Material e métodos: uma pesquisa foi realizada no período de 1987 a 2016, no banco de dados Medline/PubMed, com as palavras-chave "implantes dentários", "nervo alveolar inferior", "lateralização", "transposição", "neurossensorial" e "taxa de sucesso". Foram incluídos artigos retrospectivos e prospectivos em seres humanos, e que apresentassem relatos de disfunção neurossensorial e taxa de sucesso dos implantes dentários na região posterior da mandíbula, após procedimentos de lateralização ou transposição do nervo alveolar. Resultados: dos 142 artigos encontrados na primeira fase de seleção, apenas 26 foram incluídos na técnica LNAI, com um total de 524 procedimentos, sendo 228 na técnica de TNAI e 296 na LNAI, que foram incluídos neste estudo. O número de implantes instalados pela técnica de TNAI foi de 625, e pela técnica de LNAI foi de 401. As técnicas de TNAI apresentaram um índice inicial maior de disfunção neurossensorial, quando comparadas à técnica de LNAI. A taxa de sucesso dos implantes para a té cnica de TNAI ficou entre 80% e 100%, e para a té cnica de LNAI fi cou entre 90,5% e 100%. Conclusão: a LNAI vem sendo uma boa indicação para a reabilitação de mandíbulas atróficas verticalmente, e sua execução com o piezo diminui o risco de distúrbio sensorial. As altas taxas de sucesso dos implantes podem ser atribuídas à possibilidade da instalação de implantes longos com ancoragem bicortical, favorecendo a estabilidade primária e a biomecânica.

Objective: to compare lateralization techniques (LNAI) and transposition of the inferior alveolar nerve (TNAI) with the rate of sensorineural dysfunction, as well as the success rate of dental implants. Material and methods: a survey was carried out between 1987 and 2016 in the Medline/PubMed database, with the key words "dental implants", "inferior alveolar nerve", "lateralization", "transposition", "neurosensorial", "success rate". Retrospective and prospective articles in humans that presented reports of sensorineural dysfunction and success rate of dental implants in the posterior region of the mandible after procedures of lateralization or transposition of the alveolar nerve were included. Results: in the fi rst phase of the selection, 142 articles were retrieved, but only 26 articles on LNAI, with a total of 524 procedures, 228 on TNAI technique and 296 the LNAI, were included in the study. The number of implants installed by the TNAI technique was 625 and by the LNAI 401. The TNAI present a higher initial index of sensorineural dysfunction than the LNAI and the success rate of the implants was for the TNAI between 80% to 100%, and for the LNAI between 90.5% and 100%. Conclusion: LNAI has been a good indication for the rehabilitation of atrophic mandibles vertically and its execution with piezo reduces the risk of sensory disturbance. The high success rates of implants can be attributed to the possibility of installing long implants with bicortical anchoring favoring primary stability and biomechanics.

Osseopercepção em Implantologia Oral - Revisão da literatura / Osseoperception in Oral Implantology - Literature review

Realizou-se revisão da literatura sobre osseopercepção em Implantologia. Foi verifi cado que os trabalhos concordam sobre a existência de um mecanismo de osseopercepção provenientes de mecanorreceptores com localização ainda não bem defi nida.