RESUMO
Digestive and respiratory tracts are inhabited by rich bacterial communities that can vary between their different segments. In comparison with other bird taxa with developed caeca, parrots that lack caeca have relatively lower variability in intestinal morphology. Here, based on 16S rRNA metabarcoding, we describe variation in microbiota across different parts of parrot digestive and respiratory tracts both at interspecies and intraspecies levels. In domesticated budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus), we describe the bacterial variation across eight selected sections of respiratory and digestive tracts, and three non-destructively collected sample types (faeces, and cloacal and oral swabs). Our results show important microbiota divergence between the upper and lower digestive tract, but similarities between respiratory tract and crop, and also between different intestinal segments. Faecal samples appear to provide a better proxy for intestinal microbiota composition than the cloacal swabs. Oral swabs had a similar bacterial composition as the crop and trachea. For a subset of tissues, we confirmed the same pattern also in six different parrot species. Finally, using the faeces and oral swabs in budgerigars, we revealed high oral, but low faecal microbiota stability during a 3-week period mimicking pre-experiment acclimation. Our findings provide a basis essential for microbiota-related experimental planning and result generalisation in non-poultry birds.(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Animais , Papagaios/metabolismo , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Microbiota , Bactérias/genética , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Sistema Respiratório/microbiologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/metabolismo , Microbiologia , Técnicas Microbiológicas , Microbiota/genética , PeriquitosRESUMO
Background. All the currently recognized Malassezia species have been isolated from mammals. However, only a few of them have been isolated from birds. In fact, birds have been less frequently studied as carriers of Malassezia yeasts than mammals. Aim. In this study we describe two new taxa, Malassezia brasiliensis sp. nov. and Malassezia psittaci sp. nov. Methods. The isolates studied in this publication were isolated from pet parrots from Brazil. They were characterized using the current morphological and physiological identification scheme. DNA sequencing and analysis of the D1/D2 regions of the 26S rRNA gene, the ITS-5.8S rRNA gene sequences and the β-tubulin gene were also performed. Results. The strains proposed as new species did not completely fit the phenotypic profiles of any the described species. The validation of these new species was supported by analysis of the genes studied. The multilocus sequence analysis of the three loci provides robust support to delineate these species. Conclusions. These studies confirm the separation of these two new species from the other species of the genus Malassezia, as well as the presence of lipid-dependent Malassezia yeasts on parrots (AU)
Antecedentes. Todas las especies del género Malassezia actualmente identificadas se han aislado de mamíferos. Sin embargo, tan solo unas pocas de ellas se han aislado de aves. De hecho, las aves han sido estudiadas con menos frecuencia como portadoras de estas levaduras que los mamíferos. Objetivos. En este estudio describimos dos nuevas especies del género Malassezia: Malassezia brasiliensis sp. nov. y Malassezia psittaci sp. nov. Métodos. Las cepas estudiadas en esta publicación se aislaron de loros utilizados como animales de compañía en Brasil. Las cepas se caracterizaron mediante los criterios morfológicos y fisiológicos actualmente utilizados para la identificación de estas levaduras. También se llevó a cabo la secuenciación y el análisis de los fragmentos génicos D1/D2 26S e ITS-5.8S del ADN ribosómico y del gen de la β-tubulina. Resultados. Los perfiles fenotípicos de las cepas propuestas como nuevas especies no encajaron completamente con los de las especies descritas en este género. Además, el análisis de los genes estudiados respaldó la validez de las nuevas especies. El análisis multilocus de secuencias de los tres loci estudiados reforzó con mayor firmeza la definición de las nuevas especies. Conclusiones. Todos estos estudios confirman la separación de estas dos nuevas especies del resto de las especies descritas del género Malassezia, así como la existencia de especies dependientes de lípidos del género Malassezia en loros (AU)
