Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: Prevalence, categorization and root-cause analysis based on the World Endoscopic Organization systemCáncer colorrectal poscolonoscopia / Prevalencia, categorización y análisis de las causas subyacentes basado en las recomendaciones de la Organización Mundial de Endoscopia

Aims: The World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) recommends that endoscopy units implement a process to identify postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). The aims of this study were to assess the 3-year PCCRC rate and to perform root-cause analyses and categorization in accordance with the WEO recommendations.Patients and methods: Cases of colorectal cancers (CRCs) in a tertiary care center were retrospectively included from January 2018 to December 2019. The 3-year and 4-year PCCRC rates were calculated. A root-cause analysis and categorization of PCCRCs (interval and type A, B, C noninterval PCCRCs) were performed. The level of agreement between two expert endoscopists was assessed. Results: A total of 530 cases of CRC were included. A total of 33 were deemed PCCRCs (age 75.8±9.5 years; 51.5% women). The 3-year and 4-year PCCRC rates were 3.4% and 4.7%, respectively. The level of agreement between the two endoscopists was acceptable either for the root-cause analysis (k=0.958) or for the categorization (k=0.76). The most plausible explanations of the PCCRCs were 8 “likely new PCCRCs”, 1 (4%) “detected, not resected”, 3 (12%) “detected, incomplete resection”, 8 (32%) “missed lesion, inadequate examination”, and 13 (52%) “missed lesion, adequate examination”. Most PCCRCs were deemed noninterval Type C PCCRCs (N=17, 51.5%). Conclusion: WEO recommendations for root-cause analysis and categorization are useful to detect areas for improvement. Most PCCRCs were avoidable and were likely due to missed lesions during an otherwise adequate examination.(AU)

Objetivo: La Organización Mundial de Endoscopia recomienda que las unidades de endoscopia implementen procedimientos para identificar el cáncer colorrectal poscolonoscopia (CCRPC). Los objetivos de este estudio fueron evaluar la tasa de CCRPCP a los 3 y 4 años, realizar un análisis de causalidad potencial y categorización siguiendo las recomendaciones de la Organización Mundial de Endoscopia.Pacientes y métodos: Se incluyeron retrospectivamente los cánceres colorrectales diagnosticados de enero de 2018 a diciembre de 2019 en un hospital de tercer nivel. Se calculó la tasa de CCRPC a 3 años. Se realizó un análisis de causalidad potencial y categorización de los CCRPC (intervalo y CCRPC de no intervalo tipo A, B, C). Se evaluó la concordancia entre dos endoscopistas expertos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 530 cánceres colorrectales. Un total de 33 se consideraron CCRPC (edad 75,8±9,5 años; 51,5% mujeres). La tasa de CCRPC a 3 y 4 años fue del 3,4% y 4,7% respectivamente. La concordancia entre los dos endoscopistas fue aceptable para el análisis de causalidad (k=0,958) y para la categorización (k=0,76). La explicación probable de los CCRPC fue: 8 «probable CCRPC de novo», 1 (4%) «detectado, no resecado», 3 (12%) «detectado, resección incompleta», 8 (32%) «no detectado, examen inadecuado» y 13 (52%) «no detectado, examen adecuado». La mayoría de los CCRPC se consideraron de no intervalo tipo C (N=17, 51,5%). Conclusión: Las recomendaciones de la Organización Mundial de Endoscopia para el análisis de causalidad y la categorización son útiles para detectar áreas de mejora. La mayoría de los CCRPC eran evitables debido a lesiones no detectadas a pesar de realizar un examen adecuado.(AU)

Uso de paneles de genes en pacientes con alto riesgo de cáncer digestivo hereditario: documento de posicionamiento de la AEG, SEOM, AEGH y consorcio IMPaCT-GENÓMICA / Use of multi-gene panels in patients at high risk of hereditary digestive cancer: position statement of AEG, SEOM, AEGH and IMPaCT-GENÓMICA consortium

Este documento de posicionamiento, auspiciado por la Asociación Española de Gastroenterología, la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica, la Asociación Española de Genética Humana y el consorcio IMPaCT-Genómica, tiene como objetivo realizar recomendaciones para el uso de paneles de genes en la evaluación de individuos con alto riesgo de cáncer digestivo hereditario. Para medir la calidad de la evidencia y los niveles de recomendación se ha utilizado la metodología basada en el sistema Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Se obtuvo el consenso entre expertos mediante un método Delphi. El documento incluye recomendaciones sobre escenarios clínicos en los que se recomienda el uso de paneles de genes en cáncer colorrectal, síndromes polipósicos, cáncer gástrico y pancreático, así como los genes de los paneles a ser considerados en cada una de estas situaciones clínicas. También se establecen recomendaciones sobre la evaluación de mosaicismos, las estrategias de asesoramiento ante la ausencia de sujeto índice y, finalmente, el análisis constitucional tras identificación de variantes patogénicas tumorales. (AU)

This position statement, sponsored by the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología, the Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica, the Asociación Española de Genética Humana and the IMPaCT-Genómica Consortium aims to establish recommendations for use of multi-gene panel testing in patients at high risk of hereditary gastrointestinal and pancreatic cancer. To rate the quality of the evidence and the levels of recommendation, we used the methodology based on the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). We reached a consensus among experts using a Delphi method. The document includes recommendations on clinical scenarios where multi-gene panel testing is recommended in colorectal cancer, polyposis syndromes, gastric and pancreatic cancer, as well as the genes to be considered in each clinical scenario. Recommendations on the evaluation of mosaicisms, counseling strategies in the absence of an index subject and, finally, constitutional analysis after identification of pathogenic tumor variants are also made. (AU)

Comparative efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 therapies used in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective: Systemic studies on anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with microsatellite instability or mismatch repair defects are lacking. We aimed to summarize the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, and tislelizumab in mCRC. Methods: Network meta-analyses (NMAs) can provide comparative efficacy and safety data for clinical decision-making. In this NMA, eligible publications from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from 2016 to April 2023 were identified through a systematic literature review. Literature screening and data extraction were performed according to established criteria. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and statistical analysis was performed using Revman5.4 and R language. The main outcome indicators, DCR, ORR, PFS, and OS, were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the drugs, and the main outcome indicators AE and SAE were used to evaluate the safety of each program. Results: Fifteen studies with a sample size of 798 patients were included. In terms of effectiveness, the disease control rate DCR of PD-1 inhibitors was 0.727[95% CI:0.654-0.794]; objective response rate ORR was 0.448[95% CI:0.382-0.514]; and the 1-year progression-free survival rate was 0.551[95% CI:0.458-0.642]. The 1-year overall survival rate was 0.790[95% CI:0.705-0.865]. The adverse events associated with anti-PD-1 were 0.567[95% CI:0.344-0.778] in terms of safety. The total incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 0.241[95% CI:0.174-0.313]. In the subgroup analysis results, the incidence of DCR in the nivolumab + ipilimumab group was 0.826[95% CI:0.780-0.869], the ORR was 0.512[95% CI:0.377-0.647], and the PFS was 0.668[95% CI:0.516-0.804]. The incidence of AE was 0.319 [95% CI:0.039-0.700] and SAE was 0.294 [95% CI:0.171-0.433]... (AU)

Persistencia de enfermedad metastásica ganglionar de cáncer colorrectal con resección en bloque y colocación de injerto aortoilíaco / Persistence of lymph node metastatic disease from colorectal cancer with bloc resection and biaortoiliac graft placement

Introducción: el pronóstico del cáncer de colon está relacionado con el grado de penetración del tumor a través de la pared intestinal y con la infiltración ganglionar en el momento de la cirugía. Se reporta poca experiencia en cuanto al tratamiento quirúrgico de persistencia o recidivas locorregionales a ganglios paraaórticos con afectación de la aorta abdominal. Caso clínico: mujer que presenta persistencia locorregional del cáncer colorrectal con afectación aortoilíaca. Se plantea una estrategia de tratamiento quirúrgico interdisciplinario con intención curativa, con la colocación de un injerto vascular bifurcado y conseguir la resección R0 con la supervivencia libre de enfermedad. Discusión: los pacientes con persistencia de la enfermedad metastásica requieren un abordaje quirúrgico abierto con el objetivo de lograr una resección R0. En el caso de presentarse infiltración local de estructuras a órganos adyacentes, se recomienda la resección radical en bloque. Estos procedimientos más complejos se asocian con una mayor morbilidad. Sin embargo, los beneficios asociados con la eliminación de la metástasis a ganglios paraaórticos deben considerarse frente al riesgo de morbilidad quirúrgica. (AU)

Introduction: the prognosis of colon cancer is related to the degree of tumor penetration through the intestinal wall and lymph node infiltration at the time of surgery. Little experience is reported regarding the surgical treatment of persistence or locoregional recurrences to para-aortic nodes with involvement of the abdominal aorta. Case report: woman presenting with locoregional persistence of colorectal cancer with aortoiliac involvement. An interdisciplinary surgical treatment strategy with curative intent is proposed, with the placement of a vascular graft bifurcated and achieving R0 resection with disease-free survival. Discussion: patients with persistent metastatic disease require an open surgical approach, with the goal of achieving an R0 resection. In the case of local infiltration of structures to adjacent organs, radical en bloc resection is recommended. These more complex procedures are associated with greater morbidity. However, the benefits associated with removal of para-aortic lymph node metastasis must be weighed against the risk of surgical morbidity. (AU)

Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using the most recent data available. Methods The literature on the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 versus placebo and/or best supportive care (BSC) in mCRC was obtained through a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through January 2023. Identify the included literature and extract pertinent data, such as the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), disease control rate (DCR), incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Results There were eight eligible articles that included 2903 patients (1964 TAS-102 versus 939 Placebo and/or BSC). In this meta-analysis, TAS-102 treatment resulted in longer OS, PFS, TTF, and higher DCR in patients with mCRC versus placebo and/or BSC. TAS-102 improved OS and PFS in subgroup analyses of mCRC patients with KRAS wild-type and KRAS mutant-type. In addition, TAS-102 did not increase the incidence of serious adverse events. Conclusion TAS-102 can enhance the prognosis of mCRC patients whose standard therapy has failed, regardless of KRAS mutation status, and its safety is acceptable (AU)

Management of colorectal cancer screening backlog due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective analysis of the use of a colorectal cancer screening clinical-decision support tool in Argentina

Background The COVID-19 pandemic created a backlog in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and surveillance colonoscopies. The real impact in Argentina is not fully known. Goal To estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CRC prevention by comparing the number of CRC screening and surveillance consults in a clinical decision support-tool used in Argentina before, during and after pandemic lockdown. Methods We analyzed data from May 2019 to December 2021 from CaPtyVa, a clinical decision support tool for CRC screening and surveillance. Queries were divided in pre-pandemic (May 2019 to March 2020), lockdown (April 2020 to December 2020), and post-lockdown (January 2021 to December 2021). The number of CRC monthly screening and surveillance visits were compared among the three periods and stratified according to CRC risk. Results Overall, 27,563 consults were analyzed of which 9035 were screening and 18,528 were surveillance. Pre-pandemic, the median number of screening consults was 346 per month (IQR25–75 280–410). There was a decrease to 156 (80–210)/month (p < 0.005) during lockdown that partially recovered during post-lockdown to 230 (170–290)/month (p = 0.05). Pre-pandemic, the median number of surveillance consults was 716 (560–880)/month. They decreased to 354 (190–470)/month during lockdown (p < .05) and unlike screening, completely recovered during post-lockdown to 581 (450–790)/month. Conclusions There was a >50% decrease in the number of CRC screening and surveillance consults registered in CaPtyVa during lockdown in Argentina. Post-lockdown, surveillance consults recovered to pre-pandemic levels, but screening consults remained at 66% of pre-pandemic levels. This has implications for delays in CRC diagnoses and patient outcomes (AU)

Antecedentes La pandemia de COVID-19 provocó atraso en las colonoscopias de detección y vigilancia del cáncer colorrectal (CCR). Objetivo Estimar el impacto de la pandemia de COVID-19 en la prevención del CCR comparando el número de consultas de pesquisa y vigilancia del CCR en una herramienta digital de apoyo a la decisión clínica utilizada en Argentina antes, durante y después del confinamiento. Métodos Analizamos datos entre mayo 2019 a diciembre 2021 de CaPtyVa, una herramienta digital de apoyo a la toma de decisiones clínicas para la pesquisa y vigilancia del CCR. Las consultas se dividieron en prepandemia (mayo 2019- marzo 2020), confinamiento (abril 2020- diciembre 2020) y post-confinamiento (enero 2021-diciembre 2021). El número de visitas mensuales de pesquisa y vigilancia de CCR se comparó entre períodos y se estratificó según riesgo de CCR. Resultados Prepandemia, la mediana de consultas de detección fue 346 mes (IQR25-75 280-410). Hubo una disminución a 156 (80-210)/mes (p<0,005) durante el confinamiento que ascendió a 230 (170-290)/mes (p=0,05) en el post-confinamiento. Prepandemia, la mediana de consultas de vigilancia fue 716 (560-880)/mes. Disminuyeron a 354 (190-470)/mes durante el confinamiento (p<0,05) y se recuperaron por completo durante el post-confinamiento. Conclusiones Hubo una disminución >50% en el número de consultas de detección y vigilancia de CCR registradas en CaPtyVa durante el confinamiento en Argentina. Post-confinamiento, las consultas de vigilancia se recuperaron a niveles prepandemia, pero las consultas de detección se mantuvieron en el 66 % de niveles históricos. Esto tendría implicaciones en los diagnósticos y pronósticos de CCR (AU)

The current status and prospect of immunotherapy in colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a heterogeneous disease. We reviewed the current clinical trials on immunotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer with high microsatellite instability and microsatellite stability. Owing to the advances in immunotherapy, its use has gradually expanded from second- and third-line therapies to first-line, early neoadjuvant, and adjuvant therapies. Based on current research results, immunotherapy has shown very good results in dMMR/MSI-H patients, whether it is neoadjuvant therapy for operable patients or first-line or multi-line therapy for advanced patients. KEYNOTE 016 study also showed that patients with MSS were basically ineffective in single immunotherapy. Moreover, immunotherapy for colorectal cancer may also require identification of new biomarkers (AU)

Update on the management of elderly patients with colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common tumours worldwide, and 70% of CRC patients are over 65 years of age. However, the scientific evidence available for these patients is poor, as they are underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, a group of experts from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours, (TTD) and the Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD) have reviewed the scientific evidence available in older patients with CRC. This group of experts recommends a multidisciplinary approach and geriatric assessment (GA) before making a therapeutic decision because GA predicts the risk of toxicity and survival and helps to individualize treatment. In addition, elderly patients with localized CRC should undergo standard cancer resection, preferably laparoscopically. The indication for adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) should be considered based on the potential benefit, the risk of recurrence, the life expectancy and patient comorbidities. When the disease is metastatic, the possibility of radical treatment with surgery, radiofrequency (RF) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) should be considered. The efficacy of palliative CT is similar to that seen in younger patients, but elderly patients are at increased risk of toxicity. Clinical trials should be conducted with the elderly population and include GAs and specific treatment plans (AU)

Outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis underwent cytoreductive surgery

Background This study aims to assess and compare the extent to which preoperative chemotherapy prior to CRS improves survival in patients diagnosed with CRCPM. Methods We included 251 patients from 2012 to 2019 in our center. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was used to minimize the selection bias. Survival analysis was performed to compare the survival outcomes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify prognostic factors. Result The baseline characteristics were well balanced using IPTW (standardized mean difference < 0.1). Preoperative chemotherapy cannot significantly improve overall survival (HR, 1.03; 95% CI 0.71–1.49; P = 0.88). In subgroup analysis, we found that intestinal obstruction after preoperative chemotherapy significantly reduced survival (HR, 2.25; 95% CI 1.01–5.03; P = 0.048), while in the upfront surgery group, intestinal obstruction had no impact on prognosis. Conclusion For CRCPM patients treated with CRS, preoperative chemotherapy does not seem to prolong overall survival. Furthermore, the emergence of intestinal obstruction after chemotherapy may compromise the effectiveness of treatment, resulting in a worse prognosis. This finding has important clinical implications for treatment decisions (AU)

Influence of social support and stressful life events on adherence to colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood test in Spanish medium risk population / Influencia del apoyo social y los acontecimentos vitales estresantes en el cribado de cáncer colorrectal con sangre oculta en heces en población española de riesgo medio

Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Five-year survival rate in Spain is 57%. The most important prognostic factor is the stage of the tumor at the diagnosis. CRC can be early diagnosed, but the adherence to screening programs is low (<50%). This study aims to ascertain the influence of social support and stressful life events on the adherence to the population screening of CRC with fecal occult blood test in Spanish average risk population. Methods Multicenter case–control study. We conducted a simple random sampling among individuals invited to participate in the colorectal cancer screening program. We analyzed epidemiological and social variables associated with lifestyle and behavioral factors. We performed a descriptive and a bivariant analyses and a logistic regression analysis. Results Four hundred and eight patients (237 cases and 171 controls) were included. Multivariant analyses showed independent association between higher adherence to the screening program and older age (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01–1.10), stable partner (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.08–2.89) and wide social network (OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.07–2.66). Otherwise, lower adherence was associated to perceiving barriers to participate in the program (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88–0.96). We find a statistically significant association between lower adherence and high impact stressful life events in the bivariant analyses, and the tendency was maintained (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.37–1.08) in the multivariant. Conclusion Social variables decisively influence the adherence to colorectal cancer screening. The implementation of social interventions that improve social support, reduce impact of stressful life events and the design of screening programs that decrease the perceived barriers, will contribute to increase the participation on these programs. Secondary, the colorectal cancer diagnosis will be made in early-stages with the consequent mortality reduction (AU)

Introducción El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer en el mundo. La tasa de supervivencia a cinco años en España es de 57%. El factor pronóstico más importante es el estadio del tumor en el momento del diagnóstico. El CCR se puede diagnosticar precozmente, pero la adherencia a los programas de cribado es baja (< 50%). Este estudio pretende conocer la influencia del apoyo social y los acontecimientos vitales estresantes en la adherencia al cribado poblacional de CCR con sangre oculta en heces en población española de riesgo medio. Métodos Estudio multicéntrico de casos y controles. Realizamos un muestreo aleatorio simple entre los individuos invitados a participar en un programa de cribado de CCR. Analizamos variables epidemiológicas y sociales asociadas al estilo de vida y factores conductuales. Realizamos un análisis descriptivo, un análisis bivariante y una regresión logística. Resultados Se incluyeron 408 pacientes (237 casos y 171 controles). El análisis multivariante demostró una asociación independiente entre una mayor adherencia al programa de cribado y mayor edad (OR: 1,06; IC 95%: 1,01-1,10), tener pareja estable (OR: 1,77, IC 95%: 1,08-2,89) y disponer de una amplia red social (OR: 1,68; IC 95%: 1,07-2,66). Por el contrario, la menor adherencia se asoció a la percepción de barreras para participar en el cribado (OR: 0,92; IC 95%: 0,88-0,96). Encontramos una asociación estadísticamente significativa entre menor adherencia y acontecimientos vitales estresantes de alto impacto en el análisis bivariante. La tendencia se mantuvo (OR: 0,63, IC 95%: 0,37-1,08) en el análisis multivariante (AU)

Prognostic analysis of Yes-associated protein 1 in patients with colorectal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common carcinoma worldwide, but a lack of effective prognostic markers limits clinical diagnosis and treatment. Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) is an effector of the HIPPO-pathway, which plays a critical role in cancer development and prognosis, including CRC. However, previous reports have suggested that it plays a dual role in CRC. Methods: a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 14.0 was performed to evaluate the relationship between YAP1 and clinical outcomes of CRC, after searching for eligible studies in the PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases. Online datasets GEPIA and LOGpc were also used to calculate survival results and for comparison with the meta-analysis results. Besides, “DESeq” packages were used for the expression analysis of YAP1 from the TCGA dataset. Results: YAP1 was overexpressed in the cancer tissues when compared to normal tissues in patients with CRC from the TCGA database (p = 0.000164) and GEPIA database. A total of 10 studies involving 2305 patients from the literature were selected. Pooled HR indicated that overexpression of YAP1 was associated with poor clinical outcomes (HR = 1.70, 95 % CI: 1.28-2.26, p = 0.0003). Subgroup analysis showed a clear correlation between overexpression of YAP1 and worse survival rate in Chinese patients (HR = 1.94, 95 % CI: 1.40-2.69, p = 0.0001), nuclear YAP1 overexpression (HR = 2.07, 95 % CI: 1.29-3.31, p = 0.003), 60 months of follow-up (HR = 1.89, 95 % CI: 1.30-2.73, p = 0.0008), IHC test (HR = 1.65, 95 % CI: 1.17-2.33, p = 0.005), IHC combined with other tests (HR = 1.77, 95 % CI: 1.13-2.77, p = 0.01) and multivariate analysis (HR = 1.70, 95 % CI: 1.24-2.31, p = 0.0009). Nevertheless, disease-free survival (DFS) showed no significant results in the patients with CRC in our meta-analysis (HR = 1.38, 95 % CI: 0.51-3.75, p = 0.52) as well as in the GEPIA and LOGpc databases. ... (AU)

The significance of appendectomy in the context of colorectal cancer: impacts on gut microbiota and beyond

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most common malignancies globally, of which the initiative factors are multiple and complex. More recently, the major roles played by gut microbiota in the carcinogenesis of CRC have been uncovered, which indicates that dysbiosis caused by specific bacterial or fungal species may contribute to the malignant progression of CRC. Meanwhile, appendix, classically identified as an evolutionary relict with negligible physiological functions, has been found to play crucial roles in the immune modulation process and microbiome composition of gut by its lymphoid tissue features. In addition, appendectomy, a common surgical operation modality, has also been found to be closely correlated with the clinical outcomes of multiple diseases, including CRC. Naturally, these evidence collectively point to a possibility that the appendectomy may influence the pathological process of CRC through its impacts on gut microbiome. (AU)

Liver transplantation in colorectal metastases. Is there an indication for this procedure?

Almost 25 % of patients with colorectal cancer present metastases at the time of diagnosis and 50 % go on to develop metastases in the course of the disease. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment although only between 20 % and 30 % of patients present resectable lesions. Although liver transplantation is contraindicated in unresectable metastases of colorectal cancer, ever since the publication of the results of a pilot study there has been renewed interest in transplantation in these patients. In two consecutive trials overall and recurrence-free 5-year survival rates of 83 % and 35 % respectively, have been reported, Currently several trials are ongoing which are expected to allow the patient selection criteria for the indication of liver transplantation to be refined (AU)

Occurrence and Risk Factors for Acute Urinary Retention and Urinary Tract Infection in Patients Undergoing Urinary Drainage after Colorectal Resection

Objective: This study aimed to explore the occurrence of acute urinary retention (AUR) and urinary tract infection (UTI) inpatients undergoing urinary drainage after colorectal resection and analyse the risk factors.Methods: Clinical data of 167 patients with urinary drainage after colorectal resection in Affiliated Qingdao Central Hospital ofQingdao University, Qingdao Cancer Hospital from November 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Clinicaldata included age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, lesion location, surgical method, previous history of abdominal surgery, urinarysystem diseases (urinary calculi, benign prostatic hyperplasia and urethral stricture), use of antibiotics before surgery, useof analgesic and sedative drugs after surgery, postoperative extubation time and postoperative adhesive intestinal obstruction.The postoperative AUR and UTI in patients were statistically analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyseswere used to explore the risk factors and odds ratio (OR) for AUR and UTI. (AU)