Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Filtros aplicados
Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 50(5): 61-67, sept. 2022. ilus, tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-208626

RESUMO

Objective: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is a common disease of childhood and is charac-terized by type 2 inflammation, bothersome symptoms, and impaired quality of life (QoL). Intranasal corticosteroids are effective medications in managing SAR. In addition, mometa-sone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) is a well-known therapeutic option. However, the literature provided no data about the effects of MFNS in European children with SAR. Thus, this study addressed this unmet requirement.Methods: MFNS was compared to isotonic saline. Both treatments were prescribed: one drop of spray per nostril, twice a day, for 3 weeks. Nasal cytology, total symptom score (TSS), visual analogic scale concerning the parental perception of severity of symptoms, and the Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) were assessed at baseline, after 7 and 21 days, and 1 month after discontinuation. Results: MFNS significantly reduced eosinophil and mast cell counts, improved QoL, and relieved symptoms, as assessed by doctors and perceived by parents. These effects persisted over time, even after discontinuation. Both treatments were safe and well-tolerated.Conclusions: The present study documented that a 3-week MFNS treatment was able to signifi-cantly dampen type 2 inflammation, improve QoL, and reduce severity of symptoms in Italian children with SAR, and was safe (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Furoato de Mometasona/uso terapêutico , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Obstrução Nasal/tratamento farmacológico , Pregnadienodiois/uso terapêutico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Sprays Nasais , Qualidade de Vida
2.
Acta otorrinolaringol. esp ; 71(3): 147-153, mayo-jun. 2020. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-192629

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The use of mometasone furoate (MF) intranasal spray in treating adenoid hypertrophy (AH) has a variable outcome due the different methods of adenoid size evaluation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of MF intranasal spray in children and adolescents with AH using a reliable and consistent endoscopic evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective interventional study was conducted. Evaluation took place during the first visit (week 0) and second visit (week 12). Symptoms of nasal obstruction, rhinorrhoea, cough and snoring were assessed, and an overall total symptoms score was obtained. A rigid nasoendoscopic examination using a four-grading system of adenoid size from 1 to 4 was performed. Patients were treated with MF intranasal spray for 12 weeks. Patients' aged 7-11-years old used 1 spray in each nostril once daily, while patients aged 12-17 used two sprays in each nostril once daily. Reassessment was carried out during the second visit (week 12). RESULTS: A total of 74 patients was recruited. There were significant improvements from week 0 to week 12 in the symptoms' score for nose obstruction, rhinorrhoea, cough, snoring including the total nasal symptoms' score (p < 0.001). AH significantly reduced in size from week 0 (2.89±.87) to week 12 (1.88±.83) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MF intranasal spray is effective in improving the symptoms attributed to AH as well as reducing the adenoid size. MF intranasal spray is advocated as a treatment option before adenoidectomy is considered


INTRODUCCIÓN: El papel del aerosol nasal de mometasona furoato (MF) para tratar la hipertrofia adenoidea (HA) tiene un resultado variable, debido a los diferentes métodos de evaluación del tamaño de las adenoides. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue evaluar el efecto del aerosol nasal de MF en niños y adolescentes con HA, utilizando una evaluación endoscópica fiable y consistente. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo intervencionista. La evaluación se realizó durante la primera visita (semana 0) y la segunda visita (semana 12). Se valoraron los síntomas de obstrucción nasal, rinorrea, tos y ronquidos, obteniéndose una puntuación de síntomas totales globales. Se realizó un examen nasoendoscópico rígido utilizando un sistema de clasificación del tamaño adenoideo, con valores de 1 a 4. Los pacientes fueron tratados con aerosol intranasal de MF durante 12 semanas. Los pacientes con edades comprendidas entre 7 y 11 años utilizaron 1 pulverización en cada fosa nasal una vez al día, mientras que los pacientes de 12 a 17 años utilizaron 2 pulverizaciones en cada fosa nasal una vez al día. La re-evaluación se realizó durante la segunda visita (semana12). RESULTADOS: Reunimos a un total de 74 pacientes. Se produjeron mejoras significativas de la semana 0 a la 12 en cuanto a puntuación de los síntomas de obstrucción nasal, rinorrea, tos y ronquidos, incluyendo la puntuación total de síntomas nasales (p < 0,001). Se redujo significativamente el tamaño de HA de la semana 0 (2,89 ±0,87) a la semana 12 (1,88 ±0,83) (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIÓN: El aerosol intranasal de MF es efectivo para mejorar los síntomas atribuidos a HA, así como reducir el tamaño de las adenoides. Se propone el uso de dicho aerosol intranasal como opción de tratamiento, antes de considerarse la adenoidectomía


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Furoato de Mometasona/administração & dosagem , Sprays Nasais , Hipertrofia/tratamento farmacológico , Tonsila Faríngea/efeitos dos fármacos , Obstrução Nasal/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertrofia/complicações , Tonsila Faríngea/patologia , Obstrução Nasal/etiologia
7.
Pediatr. aten. prim ; 18(69): 55-58, ene.-mar. 2016. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-152278

RESUMO

En ocasiones, los brotes de dermatitis atópica pueden ser graves y de difícil control, resistentes a los tratamientos habituales. En estos casos podemos recurrir al empleo de curas húmedas, un procedimiento con buenos resultados y escasos efectos secundarios. Presentamos una serie de casos de cinco pacientes con brotes moderados-graves resistentes al tratamiento convencional, tratados mediante curas húmedas con betametasona o propionato de fluticasona diluidos al 10% en la crema hidratante durante un intervalo de tiempo de entre 4-6 días. Se obtuvo la resolución completa del brote en cuatro casos, continuándose en el caso restante las curas de forma domiciliaria durante 2-3 días más, con posterior resolución completa. Ningún paciente presentó efectos adversos (AU)


Occasionally, atopic dermatitis outbreaks can be severe and difficult to control, resistant to standard treatments. In these cases we can use wet wraps, a procedure with good results and few side effects. We present five patients with moderate to severe outbreaks resistant to conventional treatment treated with wet wraps with betamethasone or fluticasone propionate 10% diluted for 4-6 days. Complete resolution was obtained in four cases, the last one continued by domiciliary wet wraps for 2-3 days with final complete resolution. Any patient had adverse effects (AU)


Assuntos
Pré-Escolar , Criança , Humanos , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Betametasona/uso terapêutico , Fluticasona/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapêutico , Administração Tópica , Furoato de Mometasona/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Superinfecção/complicações , Superinfecção/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...