Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 390
Filtrar
1.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 26(3): 739-746, mar. 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-230803

RESUMO

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine/cisplatin (XP) combined with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Method and materials All patients with ASCC who received radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the past 8 years were screened. Patients who received XP or mitomycin/5-fluorouracil (MF) were selected and analyzed retrospectively. Results ASCC is an uncommon cancer, there were 36 patients were included in our study. The XP group and MF group included 18 patients each. The clinical complete response (cCR) rates in the XP group and the MF group were 94.4% and 88.9%, respectively (P = 1). The 2-year local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and colostomy-free survival (CFS) rates were higher in the XP group than in the MF group (100% vs 93.3%, P = 0.32). Hematologic toxicities, especially grade ≥ 3 leukopenia (11.1% vs 44.4%, P = 0.06) and neutropenia (5.6% vs 61.1%, P = 0.001), were lower in the XP group than MF group. As a result of fewer side effects, fewer patients in the XP group demanded the dose reduction of chemotherapy (11.1% vs 50%, P = 0.03) and radiation interruption (55.6% vs 77.8%, P = 0.289). Delayed radiotherapy was shorter in the XP group (2.5 vs 6.5 days, P = 0.042) than in the MF group. Conclusion The XP regimen was as effective as the MF regimen in non-metastatic ASCC. Compared with the standard MF regimen, XP combined with IMRT showed higher treatment completion and lower toxicities. It could be considered a feasible alternative for patients with non-metastatic ASCC (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Neoplasias do Ânus/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Mitomicina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 26(2): 468-476, feb. 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-230192

RESUMO

Objectives The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using the most recent data available. Methods The literature on the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 versus placebo and/or best supportive care (BSC) in mCRC was obtained through a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through January 2023. Identify the included literature and extract pertinent data, such as the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), disease control rate (DCR), incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Results There were eight eligible articles that included 2903 patients (1964 TAS-102 versus 939 Placebo and/or BSC). In this meta-analysis, TAS-102 treatment resulted in longer OS, PFS, TTF, and higher DCR in patients with mCRC versus placebo and/or BSC. TAS-102 improved OS and PFS in subgroup analyses of mCRC patients with KRAS wild-type and KRAS mutant-type. In addition, TAS-102 did not increase the incidence of serious adverse events. Conclusion TAS-102 can enhance the prognosis of mCRC patients whose standard therapy has failed, regardless of KRAS mutation status, and its safety is acceptable (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Proteína Oncogênica p21(ras) , Pirrolidinas , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Timina/administração & dosagem , Trifluridina/administração & dosagem , Uracila/administração & dosagem
3.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 26(2): 549-553, feb. 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-230199

RESUMO

Purpose Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients has proven beneficial in overall survival. However, the optimal regimen is still a matter of debate. Materials and method In this retrospective analysis, we evaluate the results obtained in 42 patients treated in our center with 4 cycles of neoadjuvant dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) followed by radical cystectomy from August 2015 to October 2020. All patients had cT2 or higher non-metastatic MIBC. Clinical and pathological outcomes are reported. Results Of the 42 patients, 90.5% were men (n = 38) and the mean age was 65 years. All of them had ECOG 0–1 at diagnosis and most tumors had an initial clinical stage T2N0 (76%). Thirty-six patients (85.7%) completed 4 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, and 21.4% required a dose reduction. The most frequent adverse event (AE) was grade 1–2 asthenia (81%), while neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 or higher AE (38%). Complete pathological response (ypT0, ypN0) was achieved in 50% of patients (n = 21), and down-staging was observed in 57.1% (n = 24). Only one patient presented radiological progressive disease during neoadjuvant treatment (2.4%), and after a mean follow-up time of 31.5 months, 33.3% of patients experienced disease recurrence. Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 4 cycles of dd-MVAC is an effective regimen with high rates of pathological complete responses and down-staging along with an acceptable toxicity profile. DD-MVAC should be considered as an alternative to cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with good clinical performance status (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Invasividade Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 26(1): 239-244, jan. 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-229162

RESUMO

Purpose To estimate the cost-effectiveness of adding a CDK4/6 inhibitor to standard endocrine therapy in the first-line setting for advanced HR+/HER2− breast cancer in postmenopausal and premenopausal women, from the perspective of the Mexican public healthcare system. Methods We used a partitioned survival model to simulate relevant health outcomes in a synthetic cohort of patients with breast cancer derived from the PALOMA-2, MONALEESA-2, MONARCH-3 trials for postmenopausal patients, and from the MONALEESA-7 study for premenopausal patients. Effectiveness was measured in life years gained. Cost-effectiveness is reported through incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Results In postmenopausal patients, palbociclib led to an increase of 1.51 life years, ribociclib of 1.58 years, and abemaciclib of 1.75 years, compared to letrozole alone. The ICER was 36,648 USD, 32,422 USD, and 26,888 USD, respectively. In premenopausal patients, ribociclib led to an increase of 1.82 life years when added to goserelin and endocrine therapy, with an ICER of 44,579 USD. In the cost minimization analysis, for postmenopausal patients, ribociclib was the treatment with the highest costs due to follow-up requirements. Conclusion Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib demonstrated a significant increase in effectiveness in postmenopausal patients, and ribociclib in premenopausal patients, when added to standard endocrine therapy for patients with advanced HR+/HER2− breast cancer. At the national stablished willingness to pay, only the addition of abemaciclib to standard endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women would be considered cost-effective. However, differences on results between therapies for postmenopausal patients were not statistically significant (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , 4-Aminopiridina/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Inibidoras de Quinase Dependente de Ciclina/administração & dosagem , México
5.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 26(1): 269-277, jan. 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-229165

RESUMO

Background This study aims to assess and compare the extent to which preoperative chemotherapy prior to CRS improves survival in patients diagnosed with CRCPM. Methods We included 251 patients from 2012 to 2019 in our center. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was used to minimize the selection bias. Survival analysis was performed to compare the survival outcomes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify prognostic factors. Result The baseline characteristics were well balanced using IPTW (standardized mean difference < 0.1). Preoperative chemotherapy cannot significantly improve overall survival (HR, 1.03; 95% CI 0.71–1.49; P = 0.88). In subgroup analysis, we found that intestinal obstruction after preoperative chemotherapy significantly reduced survival (HR, 2.25; 95% CI 1.01–5.03; P = 0.048), while in the upfront surgery group, intestinal obstruction had no impact on prognosis. Conclusion For CRCPM patients treated with CRS, preoperative chemotherapy does not seem to prolong overall survival. Furthermore, the emergence of intestinal obstruction after chemotherapy may compromise the effectiveness of treatment, resulting in a worse prognosis. This finding has important clinical implications for treatment decisions (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertermia Induzida/métodos , Análise de Sobrevida , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prognóstico
6.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(10): 2892-2900, oct. 2023. graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-225070

RESUMO

Purpose To analyze the effect of cisplatin cycles on the clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Methods This study included 749 patients with LACC treated with CCRT between January 2011 and December 2015. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the optimal cut-off of cisplatin cycles in predicting clinical outcomes. Clinicopathological features of the patients were compared using the Chi-square test. Prognosis was assessed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard models. Toxicities were compared among different cisplatin cycle groups. Results Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off of the cisplatin cycles was 4.5 (sensitivity, 64.3%; specificity, 54.3%). The 3-year overall, disease-free, loco-regional relapse-free, and distant metastasis-free survival for patients with low-cycles (cisplatin cycles < 5) and high-cycles (≥ 5) were 81.5% and 89.0% (P < 0.001), 73.4% and 80.1% (P = 0.024), 83.0% and 90.8% (P = 0.005), and 84.9% and 86.8% (P = 0.271), respectively. In multivariate analysis, cisplatin cycles were an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. In the subgroup analysis of high-cycle patients, patients who received over five cisplatin cycles had similar overall, disease-free, loco-regional relapse-free, and distant metastasis-free survival to patients treated with five cycles. Acute and late toxicities were not different between the two groups. Conclusion Cisplatin cycles were associated with overall, disease-free, and loco-regional relapse-free survival in LACC patients who received CCRT. Five cycles appeared to be the optimal number of cisplatin cycles during CCRT (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológico , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Curva ROC , Prognóstico , Intervalo Livre de Doença
7.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(10): 2911-2921, oct. 2023. graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-225072

RESUMO

Purpose Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) treatment has classically presented a percentage of associated complications that have limited its expansion. The aim of this study is to describe the morbimortality results obtained from a referral center implemented with the support of a governmental health agency and directed by a surgical team experienced in CRS for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM). Methods Data from the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Program of Catalonia (PCPC) prospective database, including patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC between September 2006 and January 2021, were analyzed. Results A total of 1151 consecutive patients underwent 1321 CRS + HIPEC procedures. Colonic origin of peritoneal metastasis was the most frequent (47.3%). Median PCI was 7 and most patients had CC0-1 (96.1%). Multivisceral resection was performed in 44% of all patients, 57% required digestive anastomosis. Median hospital stay was 11 days (range 6–144 days). High-grade complications occurred in 20% of all patient, most of them surgical complications. Anastomotic leak occurred in 0.6% of all cases. The overall in-stay and 30-day mortality rate was 0.4%. The low-rate of complications and the high rate of complete CRS were achieved from the beginning of the PCPC. Median overall survival was 54.7 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 47.5%. Conclusions Implementation of a CRS + HIPEC referral program for the treatment of PSM with preferably an experienced surgical team enables acceptable rates of severe morbidity (20%) and mortality (< 1%) (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Peritoneais/mortalidade , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia Combinada , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
8.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(10): 2950-2959, oct. 2023. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-225076

RESUMO

Introduction/objectives To describe abemaciclib use in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who participated in the Named Patient Use program (NPU) in Spain.Material and methods This retrospective study was based on medical record review of patients across 20 centers during 2018/2019. Patients were followed up until death, enrolment in a clinical trial, loss of follow-up or study end. Clinical and demographic characteristics, treatment patterns and abemaciclib effectiveness were analyzed; time-to-event and median times were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier (KM) method. Results The study included 69 female patients with mBC (mean age 60.4 ± 12.4 years), 86% of whom had an initial diagnosis of early BC and 20% had an ECOG ≥ 2. Median follow-up was 23 months (range 16–28). Metastases were frequently observed in bone (79%) and visceral tissue (65%), with 47% having metastases in > 2 sites. Median number of treatment lines before abemaciclib was 6 (range 1–10). Abemaciclib monotherapy was received by 72% of patients and combination therapy with endocrine therapy by 28% of patients; 54% of patients required dose adjustments, with a median time to first adjustment of 1.8 months. Abemaciclib was discontinued in 86% of patients after a median of 7.7 months (13.2 months for combination therapy and 7.0 months for monotherapy) mainly due to disease progression (69%). Conclusion These results suggest that abemaciclib is effective, as monotherapy and in combination, for patients with heavily pretreated mBC, consistent with clinical trial results (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha
11.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(8): 2384-2392, aug. 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-222416

RESUMO

Objective Larynx preservation is the current standard for locally advanced (LA) laryngeal/hypopharyngeal tumors, but not all patients respond as expected. TALK score model measures four variables (T-staging, albumin levels, liquor consumption and Karnofsky score) to determine which cases are best suited to preservation treatment scheme. We aimed to validate this prognostic model in a Southern European population. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 175 patients diagnosed from July 2008 to December 2015 with LA laryngeal/hypopharyngeal carcinoma and treated with a laryngeal preservation scheme comprising induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We applied the TALK score model to predict larynx preservation rate. Results Of the 175 patients evaluated, 96.6% were men, 98.3% were smokers and 77.1% misused alcohol. Tumors were laryngeal 66.3% vs 33.7% in hypopharynx, and all were either stage III (37.7%) or stage IV (62.3%). TALK prognostic subgroups were: good risk 40.0%; intermediate risk 52.5%; and poor risk 7.5%. With a median follow-up of 40.1 months, larynx preservation rate, laryngectomy-free survival and overall survival at 3 years was 84.5%, 63.7% and 68.2%, respectively. Although TALK score was not predictive of 3-year larynx preservation rate (good risk 85.5%; intermediate risk 83.1%; poor risk 91.6%), it was predictive of 3-year overall survival (good risk 81.9%; intermediate risk 62.9%; poor risk 33.5%) and 3-year laryngectomy-free survival (good risk 75.6%; intermediate risk 59.6%; poor risk 30.7%) Conclusion TALK model could predict OS and laryngectomy-free survival, helping clinicians to decide which patients should avoid laryngeal preservation and undergo laryngectomy after diagnosis (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Laríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Prognóstico
12.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(8): 2514-2522, aug. 2023. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-222427

RESUMO

Purpose This is a retrospective, single-center PSM study evaluating the efficacy and safety of chidamide combined with the CHOEP (C-CHOEP) regimen versus the single CHOEP regimen in patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL). Patients Patients newly diagnosed with PTCL between January 2015 and June 2021 were recruited, and were 1:1 divided into C-CHOEP and CHOEP groups according to their first-line chemotherapy regimens. The PSM method was used to match the baseline variables to balance the confounding factors. Results A cohort of 33 patients each in the C-CHOEP and CHOEP groups was generated after propensity score-matching (PSM). The complete remission (CR) rates of the C-CHOEP regimen were higher than that of the CHOEP regimen (56.3 vs. 25.8%, p = 0.014), whereas the duration of response of the C-CHOEP group was shorter (median DOR 30 vs. 57 months), resulting in roughly similar progression-free survival (PFS) and (overall survival) OS between the two groups. The responding patients who received chidamide maintenance therapy showed a trend of superior PFS and OS compared with patients who did not receive maintenance therapy. Conclusions The C-CHOEP regimen was well tolerated but failed to show advantages over the CHOEP regimen in patients with untreated PTCL; however, the chidamide maintenance may contribute to a more durable response and stable long-term survival (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Etoposídeo/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Pontuação de Propensão , Vincristina/administração & dosagem , Vindesina/administração & dosagem
13.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(7): 1916-1928, jul. 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-222367

RESUMO

In recent years, the exploration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has resulted in substantial progress and has changed the pattern of cancer treatment. ICIs have revolutionized the treatment landscape of microsatellite instable colorectal cancer while the efficacy is very limited in patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Therefore, sensitizing MSS CRC to immunotherapy is a major challenge in the field of CRC immunotherapy. Immunotherapy-based combination therapy is an effective strategy. This review of radiotherapy (RT) as a local treatment has dramatically changed in recent years, and it is now widely accepted that RT can deeply reshape the tumor environment by modulating the immune response. Such evidence gives a strong rationale for the synergism of radiotherapy and immunotherapy, introducing the era of ‘immunoradiotherapy’. How to give full play to the synergistic effect of radiotherapy and immunotherapy to improve the therapeutic effect of MSS CRC and bring good prognosis is a hot problem to be solved in the field of cancer treatment.This article reviews the development of CRC immunotherapy, the immune resistance mechanism of MSS CRC, and the impact and potential value of immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy on the immune environment of CRC (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/radioterapia , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Instabilidade de Microssatélites , Repetições de Microssatélites , Terapia Combinada , Terapia de Imunossupressão
14.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(6): 1673-1681, jun. 2023. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-221199

RESUMO

Purpose Low expression of HER2 (HER2-low expression) in breast cancer (BC) has unique biological characteristics. However, whether HER2-low expression has an impact on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in HER2-negative breast cancer remains unclear. Methods This study reviewed the clinicopathological data of patients with BC treated with NACT at a single hospital from January 2018 to July 2022. Baseline patient characteristics, efficacy of NACT, and survival data were compared between the HER2-0 and HER2-low groups. The impact of NACT on HER2 status also was investigated. Subgroup analyses based on hormone receptor (HR) status were performed to explore the impact of HR signaling on HER2 status during chemotherapy. Results The progesterone receptor-positive rate in the HER2-low group was significantly higher than that in HER2-0 group. The local treatment response of the HER2-low group was worse, but the disease-free survival rate of the HER2-low group was significantly better than that of the HER2-0 group. The proportion of patients with increased HER2 immunohistochemistry score after NACT was significantly higher in the HER2-0 group. Subgroup analysis showed that the efficacy of chemotherapy in HR + patients was significantly worse than in HR− patients, and HR + patients had a higher proportion of increased HER2 immunohistochemistry score after chemotherapy. Mechanistic studies suggested that MLH1 expression loss during chemotherapy might link HR signaling and regulation of HER2 expression. Conclusions We found that HER2-low expressing BC exhibits differential sensitivity to chemotherapy compared to HER2-0 expressing BC. The regulation of HER2 expression by HR signaling may mediate aspects of chemoresistance (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Terapia Neoadjuvante
15.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(5): 1368-1377, mayo 2023. graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-219520

RESUMO

Background and purpose To predict treatment-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) and second cancer 30-yea. absolute mortality risks (AMR30) for patients with mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma in a large multicentre radiation oncology network in Ireland. Material and methods This study includes consecutive patients treated for mediastinal lymphoma using chemotherapy and involved site radiotherapy (RT) 2016–2019. Radiation doses to heart, left ventricle, cardiac valves, lungs, oesophagus, carotid arteries and female breasts were calculated. Individual CVD and second cancer AMR30 were predicted using Irish background population rates and dose–response relationships. Results Forty-four patients with Hodgkin lymphoma were identified, 23 females, median age 28 years. Ninety-eight percent received anthracycline, 80% received 4–6 cycles ABVD. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) ± deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) was delivered, median total prescribed dose 30 Gy. Average mean heart dose 9.8 Gy (range 0.2–23.8 Gy). Excess treatment-related mean AMR30 from CVD was 2.18% (0.79, 0.90, 0.01, 0.13 and 0.35% for coronary disease, heart failure, valvular disease, stroke and other cardiac diseases), 1.07% due to chemotherapy and a further 1.11% from RT. Excess mean AMR30 for second cancers following RT were: lung cancer 2.20%, breast cancer in females 0.34%, and oesophageal cancer 0.28%. Conclusion For patients with mediastinal lymphoma excess mortality risks from CVD and second cancers remain clinically significant despite contemporary chemotherapy and photon-RT. Efforts to reduce the toxicity of combined modality treatment, for example, using DIBH, reduced margins and advanced RT, e.g. proton beam therapy, should be continued to further reduce potentially fatal treatment effects (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Doença de Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Hodgkin/radioterapia , Neoplasias do Mediastino/etiologia , Neoplasias do Mediastino/radioterapia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bleomicina/administração & dosagem , Dacarbazina/administração & dosagem , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Vimblastina/administração & dosagem
16.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(5): 1455-1462, mayo 2023. graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-219528

RESUMO

Introduction The second-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with FOLFIRI-aflibercept demonstrated an increase in survival compared with FOLFIRI in patients previously treated with oxaliplatin-based regimens. Few data are available in patients treated previously with bevacizumab. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI-aflibercept in second-line treatment in patients who have previously received bevacizumab. Patients and methods This is a observational, retrospective study of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFIRI-aflibercept in 2nd line in eight hospitals in the Valencian Community. Survival, response, and toxicity were analyzed. Result 122 patients with a median age of 61 years were included. 89% of patients had PS 0–1. The median of PFS (progression free survival) and OS (overall survival) was 5.45 (95% CI 4.74–6.15 months) and 10.15 (95% CI 7.47–12.82 months), respectively. Disease control rate 59.8%. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (13,1%) and asthenia (9%). The presence of hypertension during treatment with FOLFIRI-aflibercept was associated with a survival benefit. Median of OS was 14.45 (95% CI 11.58–17.32) in patients with hypertension vs 7.78 (95% CI 5.02–10.54) in patients without hypertension (p = .001). Our results suggest that the presence of PS 0, primary tumor surgery, metachronous metastases, and the presence of only 1 metastatic location, are favorable prognostic factors associated with better OS. Conclusions Our results confirm the value of maintaining angiogenesis inhibition with FOLFIRI-aflibercept in mCRC after progression to a first-line treatment with bevacizumab. The development of hypertension during treatment is a possible predictive marker of response (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem
20.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 24(11): 2155-2165, noviembre 2022. graf, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-210143

RESUMO

Panitumumab plus FOLFOX (P-FOLFOX) is standard first-line treatment for RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer. The value of panitumumab rechallenge is currently unknown. We assessed addition of panitumumab to FOLFIRI (P-FOLFIRI) beyond progression to P-FOLFOX in patients with no RAS mutations in liquid biopsy (LB).MethodsIn this randomized phase II trial, patients were assigned (3:2 ratio) to second-line P-FOLFIRI (arm A) or FOLFIRI alone (arm B). LB for circulating tumor DNA analysis was collected at study entry and at disease progression. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival. Two-stage Simon design required 85 patients to be included (EudraCT 2017-004519-38).ResultsBetween February 2019 and November 2020, 49 patients were screened (16 RAS mutations in LB detected) and 31 included (18 assigned to arm A and 13 to arm B). The study was prematurely closed due to inadequate recruitment. Serious adverse events were more frequent in arm A (44% vs. 23%). Overall response rate was 33% (arm A) vs. 7.7% (arm B). Six-month progression-free survival rate was 66.7% (arm A) and 38.5% (arm B). Median progression-free survival was 11.0 months (arm A) and 4.0 months (arm B) (hazard ratio, 0.58). At disease progression, RAS or BRAF mutations in LB were found in 4/11 patients (36%) in arm A and 2/10 (20%) in arm B.ConclusionsThe BEYOND study suggests a meaningful benefit of P-FOLFIRI beyond progression to P-FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with WT RAS status selected by LB. This strategy deserves further investigation. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Camptotecina/uso terapêutico , DNA Tumoral Circulante/genética , Neoplasias do Colo/etiologia , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...