Parental presence during invasive pediatric procedures: what does it depend on? / A presença dos pais durante procedimentos pediátricos invasivos: depende de quê? / Presencia de los padres durante procedimientos pediátricos invasivos: ¿De qué depende?

Abstract Objective: family-centered care during invasive procedures has been endorsed by many professional health care organizations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the health professionals' attitudes towards parental presence during their child's invasive procedure. Method: pediatric healthcare providers (divided in professional categories and range of ages) from one of the Spain's largest hospitals were asked to complete a questionnaire and write free-text comments. Results: 227 responded the survey. Most (72%) participants, in their answers, reported that parents are sometimes present during interventions, although there were differences between professional categories in this respect. The procedures in which the parents were present were those considered "less invasive" (96% of cases), while only 4% were present in those considered "more invasive". The older the professional, the less necessary parental presence was considered. Conclusion: the attitudes towards parental presence during pediatric invasive procedure are influenced by the professional category, the age of the healthcare provider and the invasiveness of the procedure.

Resumo Objetivo: o atendimento centrado na família durante procedimentos invasivos tem sido endossado por muitas organizações profissionais de saúde. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar as atitudes dos profissionais de saúde em relação à presença dos pais durante o procedimento invasivo realizado em seus filhos. Método: os prestadores de serviços de saúde pediátricos (divididos em categorias profissionais e faixa etária) de um dos maiores hospitais da Espanha foram solicitados a preencher um questionário e escrever comentários de texto livre. Resultados: a pesquisa foi respondida por 227 pessoas. A maioria (72%) dos participantes, em suas respostas, relatou que os pais algumas vezes estão presentes durante as intervenções, embora houvesse diferenças entre as categorias profissionais a esse respeito. Os procedimentos em que os pais estavam presentes eram aqueles considerados "menos invasivos" (96% dos casos), enquanto apenas 4% estavam presentes naqueles considerados "mais invasivos". Quanto mais velho o profissional, a presença dos pais foi considerada menos necessária. Conclusão: as atitudes em relação à presença dos pais durante o procedimento pediátrico invasivo são influenciadas pela categoria profissional, a idade do prestador de serviço de saúde e a invasividade do procedimento.

Resumen Objetivo: la atención centrada en la familia durante procedimientos invasivos ha sido respaldada por muchas organizaciones profesionales dedicadas al cuidado de la salud. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar las actitudes de los profesionales de la salud con respecto a la presencia de los padres durante los procedimientos invasivos realizados en niños. Método: a los prestadores de atención médica en Pediatría (divididos en categorías profesionales y rangos de edad) de uno de los hospitales más importantes de España se les solicitó que respondieran un cuestionario y redactaran comentarios de texto libre. Resultados: un total de 227 profesionales respondieron la encuesta. En sus respuestas, la mayoría (72%) de los participantes informó que, en ocasiones, los padres están presentes durante las intervenciones, aunque se registraron diferencias entre las distintas categorías profesionales al respecto. Los procedimientos en los que los padres estuvieron presentes se consideraron como "menos invasivos" (96% de los casos), mientras que solamente el 4% estuvo presente en los considerados "más invasivos". A mayor edad de los profesionales, menos necesaria se consideró la presencia de los padres. Conclusión: las actitudes con respecto a la presencia de los padres durante procedimientos pediátricos invasivos se vieron influenciadas por la categoría profesional, la edad del prestador de salud y la invasividad de los procedimientos.

Analgesia por láser de baja potencia en pacientes con tratamiento ortodóncico / Low power laser analgesia in patients with orthodontic treatment i: en

Introducción: El dolor es el síntoma más común luego de la primera activación de la aparatología ortodóncica. El tratamiento analgésico más utilizado es el paracetamol; sin embargo, su uso inhibe la actividad de la ciclooxigenasa y la síntesis de prostaglandinas, lo que puede afectar el mecanismo del movimiento dental y el remodelado óseo. Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad del láser de baja potencia para el alivio del dolor en pacientes con tratamiento ortodóntico. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio cuasiexperimental de intervención terapéutica, desde enero hasta diciembre de 2020, en 40 pacientes atendidos en la consulta de ortodoncia del Hospital General Docente Dr. Juan Bruno Zayas Alfonso de Santiago de Cuba, en quienes se aplicaría fuerza ortodóncica por primera vez. Estos fueron distribuidos de forma aleatoria en 2 grupos de 20 integrantes cada uno: el de estudio, tratado con láser de baja potencia, y el de control, que recibió medicación convencional (paracetamol). Para la validación estadística de la información se emplearon el porcentaje y la prueba de la t de Student para muestras independientes, con 95 % de confiabilidad. Resultados: Luego de tres sesiones terapéuticas, 90,0 % del grupo de estudio refirió no presentar dolor o sentirlo de forma leve, mientras que del grupo de control solo 10,0 % de los pacientes fue ubicado en cualquiera de las dos categorías anteriores. Existió diferencia significativa entre ambos grupos (p=0,00). Conclusiones: Se demostró que el láser, como terapia alternativa, fue más efectivo que el paracetamol.

Introduction: Pain is the most common symptom after the first activation of orthodontic appliance. The most widely used analgesic treatment is paracetamol; however, its use inhibits cyclooxygenase activity and prostaglandin synthesis, which can affect the mechanism of tooth movement and bone remodeling. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of low power laser for pain relief in patients with orthodontic treatment. Methods: A quasi-experimental study of therapeutic intervention was carried out, from January to December 2020, in 40 patients treated at the orthodontic clinic of Dr. Juan Bruno Zayas Alfonso Teaching General Hospital in Santiago de Cuba, in whom orthodontic force was applied for the first time. These were randomly distributed into 2 groups of 20 members each: the study group, treated with low-power laser, and the control group, that received conventional medication (paracetamol). For statistical validation of data, the percentage and the Student's t test for independent samples were used, with 95 % confidence interval. Results: After three therapeutic sessions, 90.0% of the study group reported not presenting pain or feeling it slightly, while only 10.0% of patients in control group were put in any of the two previous categories. There was a significant difference between both groups (p=0.00). Conclusions: Laser, as an alternative therapy, was shown to be more effective than paracetamol.

Como avaliar a dor sentida por crianças pré-escolares durante os procedimentos odontológicos? revisão de escopo / How to evaluate the pain felt by preschool children during dental procedures? scope review

Introdução: o diagnóstico da dor sentida pela criança é um passo importante para orientar o cirurgião-dentista sobre o uso de técnicas farmacológicas e não farmacológicas que minimizem a sensação desagradável. Objetivo: identificar os instrumentos usados para a avaliação da dor de crianças pré-escolares durante procedimentos odontológicos. Fontes dos dados: busca por artigos foi realizada no PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library e Google Schoolar, em abril/2022. Estudos observacionais e de intervenção que avaliaram a dor de crianças pré- escolares em atendimento odontológico, publicados em português, inglês ou espanhol foram incluídos. Estudos que avaliaram a dor de crianças tratadas sob sedação ou anestesia geral, bem como a dor pós-operatória, foram excluídos. Síntese dos dados: um total de 767 artigos foram identificados; 133 artigos foram lidos integralmente e 62 incluídos. Em 48 estudos, a dor foi avaliada por meio de autorrelato, usando instrumentos como a Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale e outras escalas de faces como a Faces Pain Scale-Revised e a Faces Pain Scale. Quando a dor foi avaliada a partir do comportamento infantil, foram usadas escalas como a Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC) e a Sound, Eye and Motor scale (SEM). Conclusão: a dor processual das crianças foi avaliada por meio de autorrelato e da observação do seu comportamento. Tanto as escalas de autorrelato quanto as observacionais têm limitações. A combinação dos instrumentos pode ser uma estratégia na avaliação da dor de pré-escolares.

Introduction: the diagnosis of the pain felt by the child is an important step to guide the dentist on the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological techniques that minimize unpleasant sensation. Objective: to identify the instruments used to assess the pain of preschool children during dental procedures. Sources of Data: search for articles was conducted at PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library and Google Schoolar in April/2022. Observational and interventional studies that evaluated the pain of preschool children in dental care, published in Portuguese, English or Spanish were included. Studies evaluating the pain of children treated under sedation or general anesthesia, as well as postoperative pain, were excluded. Synthesis of data: a total of 767 articles were identified; 133 articles were read in full and 62 included. In 48 studies, pain was evaluated by self-report, using instruments such as the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale and other face scales such as the Faces Pain Scale-Revised and the Faces Pain Scale. When pain was evaluated from child behavior, scales such as Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC) and Sound, Eye and Motor scale (SEM) were used. Conclusion: the procedural pain of the children was evaluated by self-report and the observation of their behavior. Both self-report and observational scales have limitations. The combination of the instruments can be a strategy in the evaluation of the pain of preschoolers.

Efficacy of opioids and non-opioid analgesics in the treatment of post procedure pain of burned patients: a narrative review

Abstract Introduction Burns are a common trauma that cause acute severe pain in up to 80% of patients. The objective of this narrative review is to evaluate the efficacy of opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, gabapentinoids, ketamine, and lidocaine in the treatment of acute pain in burn victims. Methodology The databases explored were PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials, and OpenGrey. The included randomized, controlled clinical trials assessed the analgesic efficacy of these drugs on hospitalized patients, had no age limit, patients were in the acute phase of the burn injury and were compared to placebo or other analgesic drugs. Studies describing deep sedation, chronic opioid use, chronic pain, and patients taken to reconstructive surgeries were excluded. The Jadad scale was used to evaluate quality. Results Six randomized controlled clinical trials (397 patients) that evaluated the analgesic efficacy of fentanyl (n = 2), nalbuphine (n = 1), ketamine (n = 1), gabapentin (n = 1), and lidocaine (n = 1) to treat post-procedural pain were included. Fentanyl, nalbuphine, and ketamine were effective, while lidocaine was associated with a slight increase in reported pain and gabapentin showed no significant differences. Two studies were of high quality, one was of medium high quality, and three were of low quality. No studies on the efficacy of NSAIDs or paracetamol were found. Conclusion Evidence of efficacy is very limited. Fentanyl, nalbuphine, and ketamine seem to be effective for controlling acute pain in burn patients, whereas gabapentin and lidocaine did not show any efficacy.

Prevalence and intensity of pain during diagnostic hysteroscopy in women attending an infertility clinic: analysis of 489 cases / Prevalência e intensidade da dor na histeroscopia diagnóstica em mulheres atendidas em uma clínica de infertilidade: análise de 489 casos

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate the prevalence and intensity of pain perception during diagnostic hysteroscopy in women and potential related factors. Methods A total of 489 women were investigated at an infertility clinic. Fluid diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed without analgesia or anesthesia by gynecologists with different levels of experience in operative hysteroscopy, using a 2.9mm rigid scope. The Visual Analog Scale was used to score pain intensity after vaginal speculum insertion and after hysteroscopy. Data collected included age, ethnicity, body mass index, history of infertility and endometrial surgery (curettage and/or hysteroscopy), smoking habits, and hysteroscopy diagnosis. Only the state of anxiety was assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory given to each patient before the procedure. Results Hysteroscopy median (25th to 75th) Visual Analog Scale scored 3.3 (3 to 5), and 41.7% of the women referred Visual Analog Scale score ≥4. Median (25th to 75th) State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score was 42 (38 to 45), and 58.3% of the women referred State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score >40. Hysteroscopy Visual Analog Scale score was significantly correlated to surgeon experience and to vaginal speculum insertion but not to State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score, ethnicity or abnormal hysteroscopic findings. Conclusion Diagnostic hysteroscopy was mostly perceived as a mild discomfort procedure by most women. Nevertheless, in a considerable number of cases, women perceived hysteroscopy as painful. Pain perception was linked to individual pain threshold and surgeon experience, but not to pre-procedural anxiety state levels, ethnicity or abnormal hysteroscopic findings.

RESUMO Objetivo Investigar a prevalência e a intensidade da percepção da dor durante a histeroscopia diagnóstica, bem como os possíveis fatores relacionados. Métodos Foram incluídas 489 mulheres submetidas à propedêutica de infertilidade. A histeroscopia diagnóstica foi realizada sem analgesia ou anestesia, por ginecologistas com níveis de experiência diferentes em histeroscopia, usando histeroscópio rígido de 2,9mm. A Escala Visual Analógica foi utilizada para avaliar a intensidade da dor após a inserção do espéculo vaginal e após a histeroscopia. Os dados coletados incluíram idade, etnia, índice de massa corporal, história de infertilidade e cirurgia endometrial (curetagem e/ou histeroscopia), tabagismo e histeroscopia diagnóstica. Avaliou-se apenas o estado de ansiedade pelo Inventário de Ansiedade Traço-Estado de cada paciente antes do procedimento. Resultados A mediana (25ºa 75º) de histeroscopia pela Escala Visual Analógica foi 3,3 (3 a 5), e 41,7% das mulheres obtiveram pontuação ≥4. A mediana (25ºa 75º) do Inventário de Ansiedade Traço-Estado foi 42 (38 a 45), e 58,3% das mulheres referiram pontuação >40. A pontuação da Escala Visual Analógica da histeroscopia apresentou correlação estatisticamente significante com a experiência do cirurgião e a inserção do espéculo vaginal, mas não a pontuação do Inventário de Ansiedade Traço-Estado, etnia ou achados histeroscópicos anormais. Conclusão A histeroscopia diagnóstica foi percebida pela maioria das mulheres como desconforto leve, mas um número considerável de pacientes classificou o procedimento como doloroso. A percepção da dor esteve ligada ao limiar individual e à experiência do cirurgião, mas não aos níveis de ansiedade pré-procedimento, à etnia e nem aos achados histeroscópicos anormais.

Características clínicas da doença de Parkinson associadas à dor ao tratamento odontológico / Clinical characteristics of Parkinson's disease associated with dental treatment-related pain

Resumo Introdução A Doença de Parkinson (DP) resulta em condições clínicas desfavoráveis para a saúde bucal e não existe estudo publicado sobre dor ao tratamento odontológico em pacientes com DP. Objetivo Pesquisar associação entre características clínicas da DP e a intensidade de dor em decorrência de tratamentos odontológicos. Material e método Foi utilizada uma amostra consecutiva de 70 pacientes com DP, nos quais foram realizados 217 procedimentos odontológicos invasivos. Tempo de DP foi coletado do prontuário odontológico; estágio da DP foi definido por meio da escala de Hoehn e Yahr; défice cognitivo, por meio do Mini Exame do Estado Mental; depressão, por meio do Inventário de Depressão de Beck; e comprometimento motor, por meio da escala UPDRS/AVD. Os pacientes foram questionados se no último mês sentiram alguma sensação de dormência, formigamento, queimação ou dor bem como dificuldade para sentir cheiros ou gostos. A dor relacionada ao tratamento foi coletada por meio de uma escala numérica de dor com valores de 0 a 10. Resultado O nível de dor percebida pelos pacientes durante o tratamento odontológico não apresentou associação significativa com tempo de DP, estágio da DP, comprometimento motor nem ocorrência de depressão. Maior nível de dor foi estatisticamente mais frequente entre aqueles com défice cognitivo e aqueles que relataram a presença de maior número de sintomas sensitivos, sobretudo dormência e queimação. Conclusão A dor ao tratamento odontológico em pacientes com DP está associada aos sintomas não motores desses pacientes, especificamente o défice cognitivo e a presença de sintomas sensitivos.

Abstract Introduction Parkinson's disease (PD) results in unfavorable clinical conditions for oral health and there is no published study on pain during dental treatment in PD patients. Objective To investigate association between clinical characteristics of PD and the intensity of pain due to dental treatments. Material and method A consecutive sample of 70 patients with PD was used, in which 217 invasive dental procedures were performed. PD duration was collected from dental records; PD stage was defined using the Hoehn and Yahr scale; cognitive deficit, using the Mini Mental State Examination; depression, using the Beck Depression Inventory; and motor impairment, using the UPDRS-AVD scale. Patients were asked whether in the last month they felt any numbness, tingling, burning or pain sensation; as well as difficulty in smelling or tasting. Treatment-related pain was collected using a Numerical Pain Scale with values ranging from 0 to 10. Result the level of pain perceived by patients during dental treatment was not significantly associated with PD duration, PD stage, motor impairment or occurrence of depression. The frequency of patients who reported a higher level of pain was statistically higher among those with cognitive impairment and those who reported the presence of a greater number of sensory symptoms, especially numbness and burning. Conclusion Pain related to dental treatment in PD patients is associated with non-motor symptoms of these patients, specifically the cognitive impairment and the presence of sensory symptoms.

Resultados tras implantación de un protocolo de sedoanalgesia para procedimientos en ámbito hospitalario / Results after implementation of a sedoanalgesia protocol for procedures in hospital environment

INTRODUCCIÓN: Se analiza la efectividad y seguridad de un protocolo específico de sedoanalgesia para procedimien tos, y evalúa la satisfacción del personal sanitario con cada procedimiento. PACIENTES Y MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo de un protocolo de sedoanalgesia para procedimientos en ámbito hospitalario en menores de 18 años, con una estrategia individualizada según la situación basal del paciente, el tipo de procedimiento y la experiencia del pediatra responsable de la sedación. Se registraron las variables: diagnóstico que motiva el procedimiento, tipo de procedimiento, datos antropométri cos, alergias, medicación, estado ASA y enfermedad de base, tiempo de ayuno, auscultación pul monar, temperatura, saturación de oxígeno, frecuencia respiratoria, frecuencia cardiaca, tensión arterial, lugar de sedación, tipo de fármaco, dosis, tipo de vía, escala de sedación Ramsay, duración de la sedación, tipo y tratamiento de efectos adversos, presencia de familiares durante todo el pro cedimiento y satisfacción del paciente. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 279 sedaciones. Los fármacos más usados fueron óxido nitroso (62,7%) y midazolam (16,5%); las vías de administración más utili zadas fueron la inhalada (62,4%) y la intravenosa (15,8%). La satisfacción fue alta para el pediatra (92,5%), el enfermero (94,3%), los familiares (96,8%) y los pacientes (93,6%), con una buena correlación entre ellos, y fue significativamente menor al usar midazolam y las vías nasal y bucal. La tasa de efectos adversos fue del 3,2%, y ninguno fue grave. CONCLUSIONES: La implementación de un protocolo específico de sedoanalgesia para procedimientos en el ámbito hospitalario consigue una alta efectividad y seguridad, además de un alto nivel de satisfacción, tanto en familiares como en personal sanitario.

INTRODUCTION: We analyze the effectiveness and safety of a specific analgosedation protocol for procedures, and eva luate the satisfaction of the health personnel with each procedure. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective study of an analgosedation protocol for hospital procedures in children under 18 years of age, with an individualized strategy based on the patient's baseline situation, the type of procedure and the experience of the pediatrician responsible for the sedation. The following variables were recorded: diagnosis motivating the procedure, type of procedure, anthropometric data, allergies, medication, ASA status and baseline disease, fasting time, lung auscultation, temperature, oxygen saturation, res piratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, sedation location, type of drug, dose, route of administra tion, Ramsay sedation scale, duration of sedation, type and treatment of adverse effects, presence of family members throughout the procedure, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: 279 sedations were performed. The most commonly used drugs were nitrous oxide (62.7%) and midazolam (16.5%); the most commonly used routes of administration were the inhaled one (62.4%) and the intravenous one (15.8%). The satisfaction was high for the pediatrician (92.5%), the nurse (94.3%), the family (96.8%), and patients (93.6%), with a good correlation between them, and it was significantly lower when using midazolam and the nasal and oral routes. The adverse effects rate was 3.2%, and none was severe. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a specific analgosedation protocol for procedures in the hospital environment achieves high levels of effectiveness and safety, as well as a high level of satisfaction, both in family members and in health personnel.

Efectividad de un protocolo para la atención del dolor en neonatos menores de 1 500 gramos / Effectiveness of a protocol for pain management in newborns with less than 1 500 grams

Introducción: La atención al dolor resulta prioritaria en las unidades de cuidados intensivos neonatales. No se recogen antecedentes en Cuba de implementación de algún protocolo para el abordaje del dolor en neonatos, que no se limite solamente al tratamiento farmacológico durante la asistencia respiratoria o cirugía neonatal. Objetivo: Determinar la efectividad de un protocolo para la prevención y alivio del dolor en recién nacidos menor de 500 gramos, basado principalmente en las recomendaciones de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Neonatología. Métodos: Estudio basado en las recomendaciones de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Neonatología, de tipo analítico prospectivo de ANTES y DESPUÉS en 55 neonatos menor de 1500 gramos, nacidos en el Hospital Ginecoobstétrico Docente Provincial de Matanzas en el período marzo/2016 a marzo/2018, en el cual se comparó la intensidad del dolor según la escala COMFORTneo aplicada durante la realización de tres procederes: inserción del catéter venoso umbilical, inserción de catéter percutáneo y punción del talón, en dos grupos de pacientes: un grupo antes (n=29) y un grupo después de aplicar el protocolo de dolor (n=26). Para el análisis de variables se empleó el coeficiente de Spearman. Se consideró significativo todo valor p menor de 0,05. Resultados: El peso promedio de los neonatos estudiados fue 1 180 gramos. Luego de la implementación del protocolo se observó una disminución significativa en la intensidad del dolor durante la realización de los procederes seleccionados. Las medidas no farmacológicas fueron las más empleadas. Conclusiones: El protocolo implementado es efectivo para lograr disminuir la intensidad del dolor en neonatos menor de 1 500 gramos(AU)

Introduction: Pain management is a priority in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. There are not antecedents in Cuba of any protocol carried out for management of neonatal pain, apart from the pharmacological treatment during neonatal respiratory assistance or surgery. Objective: To determine effectiveness of a protocol for prevention and pain relief in infants with less than 1500 grams, mainly based on recommendations of the Ibero-American Society of Neonatology. Methods: A prospective analytical study of before and after was made in 55 infants with less than 1500 grams, who were born in the Teaching Gynecological and Obstetric Provincial Hospital of Matanzas, Cuba, in the period from March,2016 to March, 2018. For the study, the intensity of pain was compared by means of the COMFORTneo scale, which was carried out during the performance of three procedures: umbilical vein catheterization, percutaneous venous catheterization and heel lance; in two patients groups: one before (n=29) and the other after the implementation of the pain protocol (n=26). Spearman coefficient was used for statistical analysis of ordinal qualitative variables. All less than; 0.05 values were considered significant. Results: The average weight of the studied newborns was 1 180 grams. After implementing the protocol, a significant decrease in pain intensity was observed during the performance of the selected procedures. Non-pharmacological measures were the most used. Conclusion: The implemented protocol is effective for decrease pain intensity in newborns with less than 1 500 grams(AU)

Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Pain due to administration of local anesthetics is the primary reason for patients' fear and anxiety, and various methods are used to minimize it. This study aimed to measure the degree of pain during administration of anesthesia and determine the latency time and duration of pulpal anesthesia using two anesthetic methods in the maxilla. Materials and Methods: A randomized, single-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted with 41 volunteers who required class I restorations in the maxillary first molars. Local anesthesia was administered with a needleless jet injection system (experimental group) or with a carpule syringe (control) using a 30-gauge short needle. The method of anesthesia and laterality of the maxilla were randomized. A pulp electric tester measured the latency time and duration of anesthesia in the second molar. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure the degree of pain during the anesthetic method. Data were tabulated and then analyzed by a statistician. The t-test was used to analyze the differences between the groups for basal electrical stimulation. Duration of anesthesia and degree of pain were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. A 5% significance level was considered. Results: There was no statistical difference in the basal electrical stimulation threshold (mA) and degree of pain between the two methods of anesthesia (p>0.05). Latency time was 2 minutes for all subjects. The duration of pulpal anesthesia showed no statistical difference (minutes) between the two methods (p<0.001), with a longer duration for the traditional method of anesthesia (median of 40 minutes). Conclusions: The two anesthetics methods did not differ concerning the pain experienced during anesthesia. Latency lasted 2 minutes for all subjects; the traditional infiltration anesthesia resulted in a longer anesthetic duration compared with the needleless jet injection.

Eficacia de la sacarosa al 24% frente a leche materna / Efficacy of 24% sucrose against breast milk

Introducción: El estadío crítico en la Unidad de Neonatología es una etapa que en la actualidad acompaña la alta sobrevida de los prematuros. Los estímulos dolorosos están presentes desde el nacimiento para los que se han desarrollado múltiples formas de evaluarlo y aliviarlo. Las alternativas no farmacológicas han despertado importante interés de estudio en la disminución del dolor en neonatos. Objetivo: Administrar sacarosa al 24% a prematuros entre las 33 a 36 semanas de edad gestacional establecida o corregida que estuvieron expuestos a estímulos dolorosos previos durante su estancia crítica, por instilación oral es tan efectiva para disminuir el dolor, como la administración de leche materna por succión. Metodología: Este es un estudio epidemiológico, descriptivo, observacional, prospectivo, transversal de 2 cohortes, cuya propuesta es la administración de sacarosa al 24% versus leche materna como alternativa para disminuir el dolor en prematuros entre las 33-36 semanas. Resultados: Las dos alternativas analgésicas muestran eficacia similar; sin embargo, podría ser un requerimiento indispensable en aquellos que muestran respuestas de hiperalgesia. Conclusión: Las alternativas analgésicas son más eficaces si son consideradas como parte del tratamiento global del recién nacido que implica la concientización del personal sanitario, un ambiente propicio de desarrollo y la participación continua de los padres.

ntroduction: The critical stage in the Neonatal Unit is a stage that currently accompanies the high survival of premature infants. Painful stimuli are present from birth for which multiple ways of evaluating and alleviating it have been developed. The non-pharmacological alternatives have aroused important study interest in the reduction of pain in neonates. Objective: To administer 24% sucrose to preterm infants between 33 and 36 weeks of gestational age established or corrected who were exposed to previous painful stimuli during their critical stay, by oral instillation is as effective in reducing pain as administering breast milk by suction. Methodology: This is an epidemiological, descriptive, observational, prospective, cross-sectional study of 2 cohorts, whose proposal is the administration of 24% sucrose versus breast milk as an alternative to reduce pain in preterm infants between 33-36 weeks. Results: The two analgesic alternatives show similar efficacy; however, it could be an indispensable requirement in those who show hyperalgesia responses. Conclusion: The analgesic alternatives are more effective if they are considered as part of the overall treatment of the newborn that implies the awareness of the health personnel, an environment conducive to development and the continuous participation of the parents.

Evaluation of liquid or foam sclerotherapy in small varicose veins (ceap c1) with venous clinical severity score

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of liquid or foam sclerotherapy of varicose veins using venous clinical severity scores and possible complications. METHODS: A total of 318 patients (268 females, 50 males) who were treated with liquid or foam sclerotherapy between January 2012 and December 2012 were included in this study. RESULTS: Skin necrosis was observed in only 6 patients (1. 8%), thrombophlebitis in 10 patients (3. 1%), and hyperpigmentation in 18 patients (5. 6%) in this study group. The mean venous clinical severity score was calculated as: pain score, 1. 23 ± 0.88; varicose vein score,1.85 ± 0. 8; edema score, 0.64 ± 0.77). Pain and edema decreased at the control examination, 1 month after completion of sclerotherapy sessions. Varicose veins completely disappeared after sclerotherapy. While the decrease in edema in the foam sclerotherapy group was significantly less (P<0.001), the decline in pain showed an increasing trend (P=0.069). While skin necrosis did not develop after foam sclerotherapy, rates of pigmentation and local thrombophlebitis were similar (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we observed that both sclerotherapy methods are effective with a low rate of complications, alleviating the complaints of patients with small varicose veins, and providing considerable improvement in venous clinical severity scores.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: Nosso objetivo foi avaliar a eficácia de líquido ou espuma na escleroterapia de varizes por meio de escores de gravidade clínica venosa e possíveis complicações. MÉTODOS: Um total de 318 pacientes (268 do sexo feminino, 50 do sexo masculino) tratados com escleroterapia com espuma ou líquido entre janeiro de 2012 e dezembro de 2012 foi incluído neste estudo. RESULTADOS: Necrose da pele foi observada em apenas seis pacientes (1,8%), tromboflebite em dez pacientes (3,1%) e hiperpigmentação em 18 pacientes (5,6%) neste grupo de estudo. A média do escore de gravidade clínica venosa foi calculado como: dor pontuação 1,23±0,88, veia varicosa pontuação 1,85±0,8, edema pontuação 0,64±0,77. Dor e edema reduzido no exame de controle um mês após a conclusão das sessões de escleroterapia. Varizes desapareceram completamente após a escleroterapia. Enquanto a diminuição do edema no grupo de escleroterapia com espuma foi significativamente menor (P<0,001), o decréscimo do nível de dor mostrou uma tendência a ser maior (P=0,069). Ainda que necrose da pele não tenha se desenvolvido após escleroterapia com espuma, as taxas de pigmentação e tromboflebite local foram semelhantes (P>0,05). CONCLUSÃO: Observou-se que ambos os métodos de escleroterapia são eficazes, com baixa taxa de complicações, aliviando as queixas de pacientes com varizes pequenas, e proporcionando uma melhora considerável nos escores de gravidade clínica venosa.

The relevance of regional anesthesia in orthopaedic surgery: concepts and techniques

Before the advent of anaesthesia in surgical practice, surgeons battled with patient's maximal co-operation during surgical procedures, management of pain intra-operatively and post-operatively. Anaesthesia has greatly aided in overcoming these challenges, but a sizable proportion of reduction in these challenges but approximately 30-80% of patients complain of moderate to severe pain post-operatively indicating that post-operative pain remains a problem. Controlled epidural anaesthesia and controlled peripheral nerve block which are types of regional anaesthesia provide superior pain relief during and after surgery, making regional anaesthesia of particular relevance in orthopaedic surgery. More so, general anaesthesia has some adverse effects on the outcome of operation and the patient. These adverse effects are rare but may be disastrous and life-threatening necessitating close supervision during and after general anaesthesia. Hence, the preference should be towards regional anaesthesia with regards to the choice of anaesthesia in orthopaedic surgery. This review aims to highlight some concepts and techniques on regional anaesthesia in orthopaedic surgery.

The effect of dexmedetomidine on the acute pain after cardiothoracic surgeries: a systematic review

Abstract Introduction: Acute post-operative pain remains a troublesome complication of cardiothoracic surgeries. Several randomized controlled trials have examined the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as a single or as an adjuvant agent before, during and after surgery. However, no evidence-based conclusion has been reached regarding the advantages of dexmedetomidine over the other analgesics. Objective: To review the effect of dexmedetomidine on acute post-thoracotomy/sternotomy pain. Methods: Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were used to search for randomized controlled trials that investigated the analgesia effect of dexmedetomidine on post-thoracotomy/sternotomy pain in adults' patients. The outcomes were postoperative pain intensity or incidence, postoperative analgesia duration, and the number of postoperative analgesic requirements. Results: From 1789 citations, 12 trials including 804 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Most studies showed that pain score was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group up to 24 hours after surgery. Two studies reported the significant lower postoperative analgesia requirements and one study reported the significant lower incidence of acute pain after surgery in dexmedetomidine group. Ten studies found that the total consumption of narcotics was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group. The most reported complications of dexmedetomidine were nausea/vomiting, bradycardia and hypotension. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine can be used as a safe and efficient analgesic agent for reducing the postoperative pain and analgesic requirements up to 24 hours after cardiothoracic surgeries. However, further well-designed trials are needed to find the optimal dosage, route, time, and duration of dexmedetomidine administration.

Comparison of topical and retrobulbar anesthesia in terms of pain experience during silicone oil extraction / Comparação da sensação de dor durante a extração de óleo de silicone sob anestesia tópica e retrobulbar

ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare the use of topical anesthesia and retrobulbar anesthesia during silicone oil removal with a mixed pars plana technique, through evaluating the pain experience of patients. Methods: We selected patients according to their behavior during previous vitreoretinal surgery and ophthalmologic examinations and divided them into two anesthesia groups: topical (n=36) and retrobulbar (n=33). We used a mixed technique for the passive removal of silicone oil in both groups. During each step of the surgery, the patients' pain experience and the surgeon's comfort were scored according to a pain scale. Results: The pain experienced during the application of the anesthesia was significantly greater in the retrobulbar group (p<0.001). The topical group experienced greater pain during trocar insertion (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the overall pain experience or complications. Conclusions: The pain experience of the selected patients during silicone oil removal was comparable between the topical and the retrobulbar anesthesia. Topical anesthesia with the mixed pars plana technique is an effective and safe alternative option for silicone oil removal surgery.

RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a sensação de dor de pacientes durante a remoção do óleo de silicone sob anestesia tópica e retrobulbar, usando uma técnica via pars plana combinada. Métodos: Os pacientes foram selecionados, de acordo com suas atitudes durante cirurgia vitreorretiniana prévia e exames oftalmológicos, e divididos em dois grupos: anestesia tópica e retrobulbar. Para a remoção passiva do óleo de silicone, utilizou-se uma técnica combinada em ambos os grupos. A sensação de dor dos pacientes e o conforto do cirurgião foram classificados através de uma escala de dor durante cada etapa da cirurgia. Resultados: Os grupos anestesia tópica e retrobulbar incluíram 36 e 33 pacientes, respectivamente. A sensação de dor durante a aplicação da anestesia foi significativamente maior no grupo retrobulbar (p<0,001). O grupo anestesia tópica sentiu mais dor durante a inserção do trocarte (p<0,001). Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos em relação à sensação geral de dor e a complicações. Conclusões: A sensação de dor é comparável entre a anestesia tópica e a retrobulbar durante a remoção de óleo de silicone. A combinação de anestesia tópica e uma técnica via pars plana é uma opção alternativa eficaz e segura para a cirurgia de remoção de óleo de silicone.

Predicting intraoperative pain in emergency endodontic patients: clinical study

Abstract This prospective observational study sought to investigate the incidence of intraoperative pain (IOP) among emergency endodontic patients and to construct an IOP prediction model that includes preoperative pain level (PPL). All patients who underwent emergency endodontic treatment at Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey, during the spring term of 2016 were considered for inclusion in the study. Demographic and clinical variables and PPL were recorded. Local anesthesia was provided to all patients before beginning routine endodontic treatment. IOP was defined as the condition of requiring supplementary anesthesia before the working length was established and exhibiting persistent moderate or severe pain despite supplementary anesthesia. Data from 85% and 15% of 435 patients (178 men, 257 women; mean age: 35 years) were used to develop predictive models by multiple logistic regression analysis and to test external validity of the models, respectively. Two multiple logistic regression models achieved good model fits. Model 1 included age, pulpal diagnosis, and arc (p < 0.05). In addition to these variables, Model 2 included periapical diagnosis and PPL (p < 0.15). Models 1 and 2 showed accuracies of 0.76 and 0.75, sensitivities of 0.74 and 0.77, and specificities of 0.76 and 0.74, respectively for the modeling data (internal validity), and accuracies of 0.82 and 0.80, sensitivities of 0.83 and 0.67, and specificities of 0.81 and 0.81, respectively for the control data (external validity). The IOP incidence was 10.3%. IOP in patients undergoing emergency endodontic treatment can be successfully predicted by using models that account for demographic and clinical variables, including PPL.

The influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol used for pain control of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review

ABSTRACT The present study aimed to perform a systematic literature review to determine if there is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that interferes less within tooth movement. This research was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Articles were searched in eight electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, LILACS, SciELO, Google Scholar, and Open Grey). Only experimental studies on male Wistar rats were selected, which included experiments related to the influence of NSAIDs on orthodontic movement. Studies in animals with pathological conditions, literature review articles, letters to the editor and/or editorials, case reports, abstracts, books, and book chapters were excluded. Each of the steps of this systematic literature review was performed by two examiners independently. Results: the total sample consisted of 505 articles, from which 6 studies were eligible after a qualitative analysis. From the drugs assessed, paracetamol was unanimous for not interfering within orthodontic movement when compared to the control group. However, drugs such as aspirin, ibuprofen, sodium diclofenac, and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors caused a reduction in tooth movement when compared to the control group. Conclusion: paracetamol could be considered the drug of choice for pain relief because it interferes less within tooth movement.

Analgesic efficacy of lidocaine and multimodal analgesia for chest tube removal: A randomized trial study / Eficácia analgésica da lidocaína e analgesia multimodal na remoção do dreno torácico: Um estudo randomizado controlado / Eficacia analgésica de la lidocaína y la analgesia multimodal para la remoción del tubo torácico: Un estudio con ensayo aleatorio

Objective: to assess the analgesic efficacy of subcutaneous lidocaine and multimodal analgesia for chest tube removal following heart surgery. Methods: sixty volunteers were randomly allocated in two groups; 30 participants in the experimental group were given 1% subcutaneous lidocaine, and 30 controls were given a multimodal analgesia regime comprising systemic anti-inflammatory agents and opioids. The intensity and quality of pain and trait and state anxiety were assessed. The association between independent variables and final outcome was assessed by means of the Chi-squared test with Yates' correction and Fisher's exact test. Results: the groups did not exhibit significant difference with respect to the intensity of pain upon chest tube removal (p= 0.47). The most frequent descriptors of pain reported by the participants were pressing, sharp, pricking, burning and unbearable. Conclusion: the present study suggests that the analgesic effect of the subcutaneous administration of 1% lidocaine combined with multimodal analgesia is most efficacious.

Objetivo: avaliar a eficiência analgésica de lidocaína subcutânea e analgesia multimodal na remoção do dreno torácico após cirurgia cardíaca. Método: sessenta voluntários foram alocados aleatoriamente em dois grupos; 30 participantes no grupo experimental receberam lidocaína subcutânea 1%, e outros 30 do grupo controle receberam o regime de analgesia multimodal compreendendo agentes anti-inflamatórios e opióides sistêmicos. A intensidade e qualidade da dor e Ansiedade Traço Estado foram avaliados. A associação entre variáveis independentes e desfecho final foi avaliada através do Teste Qui-quadrado com correção de Yates e o Teste exato de Fisher. Resultados: os grupos não apresentaram diferenças significante, no que diz respeito à intensidade da dor na remoção do dreno torácico (p= 0,47). Os descritores de dor mais comuns relatados pelos participantes foram dor: de pressão, aguda, como uma picada, queimar/arder e intolerável. Conclusão: o presente estudo sugere que o efeito analgésico da administração de lidocaína 1% combinada com a analgesia multimodal é mais eficiente.

Objetivo: evaluar la eficacia analgésica de la lidocaína subcutánea y la analgesia multimodal para la remoción del tubo torácico después de la cirugía cardíaca. Métodos: sesenta voluntarios fueron asignados aleatoriamente en dos grupos; 30 participantes en el grupo experimental recibieron lidocaína subcutánea al 1%, y 30 controlos recibieron un régimen de analgesia multimodal que comprende agentes antiinflamatorios sistémicos y opioides. La intensidad y calidad del dolor y rasgo y estado de ansiedad se evaluaron. La asociación entre las variables independientes y el resultado final han sido evaluados por medio de la prueba de Chi-cuadrado con corrección de Yates y la prueba exacta de Fisher. Resultados: los grupos no mostraron diferencias significativas con respecto a la intensidad del dolor después de la retirada del tubo torácico (p= 0,47). Los descriptores de dolor más frecuentes informados por los participantes fueron apretado, agudo, punzante, ardiente e insoportable. Conclusión: el presente estudio sugiere que el efecto analgésico de la administración subcutánea de lidocaína al 1% combinada con la analgesia multimodal es eficaz.