Biportal endoscopic cervical open-door laminoplasty to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Although cervical laminoplasty is a frequently utilized surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, it is primarily performed using conventional open surgical techniques. We attempted the minimally invasive cervical laminoplasty using biportal endoscopic approach. METHODS: Contralateral lamina access is facilitated by creating space through spinous process drilling, followed by lamina hinge formation. Subsequently, the incised lamina is elevated from ipsilateral aspect, and secure metal plate fixation is performed. CONCLUSION: We successfully performed the cervical open door laminoplasty using biportal endoscopic approach. Biportal endoscopic cervical open-door laminoplasty may be a minimally invasive technique that can prevent complications related with open surgery.

Prospective Investigation of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Disc Complex after Posterior Stabilization and Decompression Surgery in Patients With Non-OPLL (Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament) Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a prevalent cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults, primarily from degenerative changes. The efficacy of treatment strategies, especially surgical approaches, remains debated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the long-term impact of posterior fusion laminectomy on the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) thickness, disc complex, and myelomalacia signal changes in CSM patients. METHODS: A single-centre, prospective study from January 2020 to December 2021 included CSM patients without ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from baseline, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were collected. Measurements on the MRI were performed using the Osirix MD software, focusing on the PLL width, myelopathic foci dimensions, and canal diameter. RESULTS: Out of the 82 initially enrolled patients, 64 were considered for analysis. Postoperatively, a significant reduction in PLL width and myelopathic foci dimensions was observed, alongside a considerable increase in the canal diameter. Clinical outcomes based on the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale also showcased marked improvements post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior fusion laminectomy effectively reduces anterior pressure in CSM patients. This treatment may represent an optimal surgical approach for selected CSM cases. Furthermore, more extensive studies with extended follow-up are advocated.

[Clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with the integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine(2023)].

The "Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with the Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine" were formulated by the Orthopedic and Traumatology Professional Committee of the Chinese Association of Integrative Medicine in accordance with the principles of evidence-based medicine and expert consensus, and provide clinicians with academic guidance on clinical diagnosis and treatment of CSM. The main content includes diagnostic points, disease grading assessment, TCM syndrome differentiation, surgical indications and timing, integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment, and postoperative rehabilitation. This guideline proposes for the first time that the treatment of CSM should follow the principle of grading, clarify the timing and methods of surgical treatment, establish common TCM syndrome differentiation and classification, attach importance to postoperative integrated rehabilitation of Chinese and Western medicine, and strengthen daily follow-up management. It hopes to promote the standardization, effectiveness, and safety of clinical treatment of CSM.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities Among Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A National Administrative Database Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of racial disparities on surgical outcomes for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: Adult patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) for CSM were identified from the 2016 to 019 National Inpatient Sample Database using the International Classification of Diseases codes. Patients were categorized based on approach (ACDF or PCDF) and race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic). Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, adverse events, and health care resource utilization were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of extended length of stay (LOS), nonroutine discharge (NRD), and exorbitant costs. RESULTS: A total of 46,500 patients were identified, of which 36,015 (77.5%) were White, 7465 (16.0%) were Black, and 3020 (6.5%) were Hispanic. Black and Hispanic patients had a greater comorbidity burden compared to White patients (P = 0.001) and a greater incidence of any postoperative complication (P = 0.001). Healthcare resource utilization were greater in the PCDF cohort than the ACDF cohort and greater in Black and Hispanic patients compared to White patients (P < 0.001). Black and Hispanic patient race were significantly associated with extended hospital LOS ([Black] odds ratio [OR]: 2.24, P < 0.001; [Hispanic] OR: 1.64, P < 0.001) and NRD ([Black] OR: 2.33, P < 0.001; [Hispanic] OR: 1.49, P = 0.016). Among patients who underwent PCDF, Black race was independently associated with extended hospital LOS ([Black] OR: 1.77, P < 0.001; [Hispanic] OR: 1.47, P = 0.167) and NRD ([Black] OR: 1.82, P < 0.001; [Hispanic] OR: 1.38, P = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that patient race may influence patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization following ACDF or PCDF for CSM.

Failure of Surgical Equipoise in Posterior Cord Syndrome Myelopathy.

We suggest that a clinical diagnosis of posterior cord syndrome indicates primary posterior decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy cases. We present two unique cases of failed anterior decompression in neutrally aligned necks with compressive myelopathy and a literature review. Two recent cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy that failed to respond after anterior surgical decompression and fusion surgery were observed at our institution. Both patients had motor strength preservation but were unable to stand and walk independently and had other clinical findings consistent with posterior cord syndrome rather than the more common anterior or central cord syndromes, and both responded well to staged posterior decompression. Posterior cervical decompression successfully relieved posterior cord syndrome symptoms after a failed anterior decompression in both of our cases. Posterior cord syndrome is a rare syndrome best diagnosed clinically and should be considered in cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in which motor strength testing is preserved.

Investigation of the Efficacy of Bilateral Osteoligamentous Decompression via Hemilaminectomy in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Clinical Study.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical stability may deteriorate and kyphotic spinal deformities may develop in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) after laminectomy or laminoplasty. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of the "bilateral osteoligamentous decompression via unilateral hemilaminectomy approach (UHBOLD)" technique in CSM patients. METHODS: The study included 34 adult patients who underwent UHBOLD surgery for CSM between 2016 and 2022. A record was made for all patients of age, gender, number of operated levels, preoperative and postoperative long-term follow-up VAS scores, Nurick grade values and mJOA scores, kyphosis angles measured on X-ray, and spinal canal areas measured on T2-weighted MR axial images. RESULTS: Preoperative VAS scores of the patients were 6 (4-9), Nurick grade values were 3 (2-5), mJOA scores were 10.50 ± 3.42, kyphosis angles were -13.34 ± 13.69° and spinal canal areas were 87.11 ± 28.30 mm2. In postoperative long-term follow-up of these patients, VAS scores were 2 (1-5), Nurick grade values were 1 (0-5), mJOA scores were 13.94 ± 3.09, kyphosis angles were -15.07 ± 12.78° and spinal canal areas were 149.65 ± 42.57 mm2. A statistically significant difference was determined between the preoperative and the postoperative long-term follow-up VAS scores, Nurick grade values, mJOA scores, and spinal canal areas (P < 0.001). Kyphosis angles were not different (P = 0.198), and no instability was observed in any patient in long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The UHBOLD technique performed in multilevel CSM patients did not cause any change in cervical lordosis angle in long-term follow-up, did not cause cervical kyphotic deformity or cervical instability, and significantly improved Nurick grade values, and VAS and mJOA scores.

Trends in cervical laminoplasty and 30-day postoperative complications: 10-year results from a retrospective, multi-institutional study of 1095 patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the recent 10-year trends in cervical laminoplasty and 30-day postoperative complications. METHODS: This retrospective multi-institutional cohort study enrolled patients who underwent laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The primary outcome was the occurrence of all-cause 30-day complications. Trends were investigated and compared in the early (2008-2012) and late (2013-2017) periods. RESULTS: Among 1095 patients (mean age, 66 years; 762 [70%] male), 542 and 553 patients were treated in the early and late periods, respectively. In the late period, patients were older at surgery (65 years vs. 68 years), there were more males (66% vs. 73%), and open-door laminoplasty (50% vs. 69%) was the preferred procedure, while %CSM (77% vs. 78%) and the perioperative JOA scores were similar to the early period. During the study period, the rate of preservation of the posterior muscle-ligament complex attached to the C2/C7-spinous process (C2, 89% vs. 93%; C7, 62% vs. 85%) increased and the number of laminoplasty levels (3.7 vs. 3.1) decreased. While the 30-day complication rate remained stable (3.9% vs. 3.4%), C5 palsy tended to decrease (2.4% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.059); superficial SSI increased significantly (0% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.015), while the decreased incidence of deep SSI did not reach statistical significance (0.6% vs. 0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: From 2008 to 2017, there were trends toward increasing age at surgery and surgeons' preference for refined open-door laminoplasty. The 30-day complication rate remained stable, but the C5 palsy rate halved.

Comparing two surgical approaches for treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of anterior versus posterior surgical approaches for multisegment cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). METHODS: Eligible studies published between the period of January 2001 and April 2022 and comparing the anterior and posterior surgical approaches for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy were retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This meta-analysis failed to show any significant difference in the duration of surgery, the hospitalization time, or the improvement in the Japanese Orthopedic Association score between the anterior and posterior approaches. The anterior approach, however, exhibited increased efficacy in the improvement of the neck disability index, reduction in the visual analog scale for cervical pain, and improvement in the cervical curvature compared with the posterior approach. CONCLUSION: Bleeding was also less with the anterior surgical approach. The posterior approach provided a significantly higher range of motion of the cervical spine and showed fewer postoperative complications compared with the anterior approach. While both the surgical approaches have good clinical outcomes and show postoperative neurological function improvement, the meta-analysis shows that both anterior and posterior approaches have certain merits and shortcomings. A meta-analysis of a larger number of randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up can conclusively determine which of the surgical approaches is more beneficial in the treatment of MCSM.

The role of neuronal plasticity in cervical spondylotic myelopathy surgery: functional assessment and prognostic implication.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a degenerative disease representing the most common spinal cord disorder in the adult population. It is characterized by chronic compression leading to neurological dysfunction due to static and dynamic injury of the spinal cord in cervical spine. These insidious damage mechanisms can result in the reorganization of cortical and subcortical areas. The cerebral cortex can reorganize due to spinal cord injury and may play a role in preserving neurological function. To date, the gold standard treatment of cervical myelopathy is surgery, comprising anterior, posterior, and combined approaches. However, the complex physiologic recovery processes involving cortical and subcortical neural reorganization following surgery are still inadequately understood. It has been demonstrated that diffusion MRI and functional imaging and techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), can provide new insights into the diagnosis and prognosis of CSM. This review aims to shed light on the state-of-the-art regarding the pattern of cortical and subcortical areas reorganization and recovery before and after surgery in CSM patients, underlighting the critical role of neuroplasticity.

Does MR Signal Intensity Change have Prognostic Value in Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy? A Single-Center, Prospective Study.

Background and Objective: Neurological recovery in cervical myelopathy remains unpredictable. There is contradictory literature regarding the prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in such cases. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the morphological changes in the spinal cord in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and compare them with clinical outcome. Materials and Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, observational study. All patients with multilevel (two or more levels) cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing anterior spine surgery were included in the study. Patient demographics and radiological findings were recorded. MRI was repeated immediately post-op and at 1-year follow-up. MRI classification system based on axial images was used to evaluate presurgery and postsurgery changes and correlate them with clinical information. Results: The study comprised 50 patients (40 males and 10 females) with a mean age of 59.5 years. Average duration of symptoms before surgery was 6.29 months. Thirty-four patients underwent two-level decompression, while 16 patients underwent more than two-level decompression. Average duration of follow-up was 26.82 months. Mean pre-op Nurick grade was 2.84, and mean recovery rate was 56.73. Most common pre-op MRI type was type 1. Analysis of data by logistic regression showed better recovery rate with lower age, lower pre-op Nurick grade, and lower pre-op MRI type. Conclusion: MR classification based on signal intensity changes in axial images have been found to correlate with recovery rate.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy: Where have we been? Where are we now? Where are we going?

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), a recently coined term, encompasses a group of age-related and genetically associated pathologies that affect the cervical spine, including cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Given the significant contribution of DCM to global disease and disability, there are worldwide efforts to promote research and innovation in this area. An AO Spine effort termed 'RECODE-DCM' was initiated to create an international multistakeholder consensus group, involving patients, caregivers, physicians and researchers, to focus on launching actionable discourse on DCM. In order to improve the management, treatment and results for DCM, the RECODE-DCM consensus group recently identified ten priority areas for translational research. The current article summarizes recent advancements in the field of DCM. We first discuss the comprehensive definition recently refined by the RECODE-DCM group, including steps taken to arrive at this definition and the supporting rationale. We then provide an overview of the recent advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of DCM and modalities to clinically assess and diagnose DCM. A focus will be set on advanced imaging techniques that may offer the opportunity to improve characterization and diagnosis of DCM. A summary of treatment modalities, including surgical and nonoperative options, is then provided along with future neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies. This review concludes with final remarks pertaining to the genetics involved in DCM and the opportunity to leverage this knowledge toward a personalized medicine approach.

Up to 10-year surveillance comparison of survivability in single-level cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in New York.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) is an alternative treatment to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), which is the current gold standard, for degenerative cervical diseases such as cervical spondylotic myelopathy and cervical radiculopathy. CDR has several theoretical benefits over ACDF, including preservation of motion, earlier return to unrestricted activity, and potentially a lower risk of adjacent-segment disease. Recent literature has reported positive clinical results for CDR, but few studies have investigated the long-term risk of revision surgery of CDR versus ACDF. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the epidemiological, clinical, and operative risk factors that affect revision rates following single-level CDR and ACDF procedures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was extracted from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System using ICD-9 and CPT codes. Inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing primary, subaxial (C3-7), single-level ACDF or CDR for cervical radiculopathy and/or cervical spondylotic myelopathy between 2005 and 2013. Survivability was defined as the time between the index procedure and the presence of a subsequent discharge record for cervical spinal fusion or disc replacement. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests, t-tests, Cox proportional hazards models, and a Kaplan-Meier plot. RESULTS: A total of 7450 patients were included in this study (6615 ACDF and 835 CDR). When adjusted for patient demographics, the hazard ratios showed no significant differences in the incidence of revision risk between the two cohorts. The CDR cohort had a higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia (p < 0.05). Patients undergoing ACDF had a longer average hospital stay (2.8 vs 1.9 days, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in time to revision surgery (p = 0.486). CONCLUSIONS: CDR and ACDF have both been shown to be effective treatments for cervical spine disease. CDR patients had a shorter average inpatient hospital stay compared with ACDF patients but tended to experience dysphagia more frequently. There was a tendency toward increased survivability of CDR; however, this was not found to be statistically significant at any time point. The large size and heterogeneity of each cohort and the availability of > 10 years of surveillance data differentiate this study from other published literature. This investigation has limitations inherent to large data analysis studies, including the implementation and inaccuracy of diagnosis and procedural coding; however, this reflects real-world use of coding by practitioners.

Endplate and Facet Joint Changes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Modic changes (MC) of the vertebral endplates and facet joint degeneration are common causes of neck pain. No previous study has shown the prevalence of and relationship between MC and facet joint changes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). The objective of this article was to study the endplate and facet joint changes in CSM. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine in 103 patients with CSM was retrospectively evaluated. The scans were evaluated by 2 raters, who classified spinal segments according to the Modic classification and the degree of facet degeneration. RESULTS: In patients <50 years old, there were no MC in 61.5%. In patients with MC, Modic type II at C4-C5 was observed most frequently. MC were found in 71.4% of patients ≥50 years old. In patients with MC, Modic type II at C3-C4 was observed most frequently. Degenerative changes of the facet joints were found frequently in both patients <50 years old (77.5%) and patients ≥50 years (90.2%), and grade I degeneration was observed most frequently in both groups. There was a significant correlation between MC and facet joint changes. CONCLUSIONS: MC in the cervical spine are common magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with CSM ≥50 years old. Degenerative facet joint changes are found in the majority of patients with CSM regardless of age. We found a significant correlation between MC and facet joint changes at the same level, indicating that both imaging findings are involved in a common pathophysiological pathway.

Prognostic and risk factors for the surgical efficacy of central spinal cord syndrome in patients with preexisting degenerative cervical spinal cord compression.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the prognostic and risk factors related to surgical treatment of central spinal cord syndrome (CSS) and to find out the optimal timing of operative management. METHODS: From January 2011 to January 2019, a consecutive series of 128 patients with CSS confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were retrospectively analyzed including their clinical records and radiologic data from a prospectively maintained database in a single center. RESULTS: According to the prognosis evaluated by the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score (AMS), and ASIA impairment scale (AIS) grade, the overall postoperative outcome was good. Finally, it was found that surgical timing, presence of myelopathy or not at baseline, AMS at admission, and compression ratio were independent factors affecting the prognosis. Surgery as soon as possible after the occurrence of CSS is still advocated. CONCLUSION: Cervical myelopathy at baseline, compression ratio, and AMS score on admission were independent prognostic factors for the surgical treatment of CSS. If surgical indications are clear, early surgical intervention should be actively considered.

Using Electrical Stimulation of the Ulnar Nerve Trunk to Predict Postoperative Improvement in Hand Clumsiness in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the immediate and short-term effects of preoperative electrical peripheral nerve stimulation (ePNS) on performance of the 10-second test could predict the early postoperative outcomes of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have shown that early clinical improvement in CSM patients may be because of reversal of spinal cord ischemia after spinal cord compression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 10-second test before surgery, after ePNS, and at discharge (one week after surgery) in 44 patients with CSM who underwent C3-C7 laminoplasty and evaluated their correlations. The effects of the procedures (ePNS or operation) and sides (stimulated or nonstimulated side) for the 10-second test were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure the relationship between the 10-second test values according to the method (after ePNS vs. surgery). In addition, the Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the degree of agreement between the 10-second test obtained after ePNS versus shortly after surgery. RESULTS: The preoperative 10-second test showed the most improvement immediately after the administration of ePNS, with a gradual decrease for the first 30 minutes after completion. After the initial 30 minutes, performance decreased rapidly, and by 60 minutes performance essentially returned to baseline. The 10-second post-ePNS had a strong positive correlation with the 10-second test in the early postoperative period (at discharge=one week after surgery). These phenomena were observed with the left hand, the side stimulated with ePNS, as well as the right hand, the side not stimulated. CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative outcomes after CSM surgery may be predicted by the results of preoperative ePNS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

A Five-Year Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Synthetic Cage Versus Allograft Use in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cost-utility analysis. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-analysis comparing synthetic cage (SC) versus allograft (Allo) over a five-year time horizon. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SC and Allo are two commonly used interbody choices for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. Previous analyses comparative analyses have reached mixed conclusions regarding their cost-effectiveness, yet recent estimates provide high-quality evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision-analysis model comparing the use of Allo versus SC was developed for a hypothetical 60-year-old patient with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing single-level ACDF surgery. A comprehensive literature review was performed to estimate probabilities, costs (2020 USD) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained over a five-year period. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation of 1000 patients was carried out to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and net monetary benefits. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to estimate the contribution of individual parameters to uncertainty in the model. RESULTS: The use of Allo was favored in 81.6% of the iterations at a societal willing-to-pay threshold of 50,000 USD/QALY. Allo dominated (higher net QALYs and lower net costs) in 67.8% of the iterations. The incremental net monetary benefits in the Allo group was 2650 USD at a willing-to-pay threshold of 50,000 USD/QALY. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis revealed that the cost of the index surgery was the only factor which significantly contributed to uncertainty. CONCLUSION: Cost-utility analysis suggests that Allo maybe a more cost-effective option compared with SCs in adult patients undergoing ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Development of new postoperative neck pain at 12 and 24 months after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a Quality Outcomes Database study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients who undergo surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) will occasionally develop postoperative neck pain that was not present preoperatively, yet the incidence of this phenomenon is unclear. The authors aimed to elucidate patient and surgical factors associated with new-onset sustained pain after CSM surgery. METHODS: The authors reviewed data from the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM module. The presence of neck pain was defined using the neck pain numeric rating scale (NRS). Patients with no neck pain at baseline (neck NRS score ≤ 1) were then stratified based on the presence of new postoperative pain development (neck NRS score ≥ 2) at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 1141 patients in the CSM QOD, 224 (19.6%) reported no neck pain at baseline. Among 170 patients with no baseline neck pain and available 12-month follow-up, 46 (27.1%) reported new postoperative pain. Among 184 patients with no baseline neck pain and available 24-month follow-up, 53 (28.8%) reported new postoperative pain. The mean differences in neck NRS scores were 4.3 for those with new postoperative pain compared with those without at 12 months (4.4 ± 2.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.3, p < 0.001) and 3.9 at 24 months (4.1 ± 2.4 vs 0.2 ± 0.4, p < 0.001). The majority of patients reporting new-onset neck pain reported being satisfied with surgery, but their satisfaction was significantly lower compared with patients without pain at the 12-month (66.7% vs 94.3%, p < 0.001) and 24-month (65.4% vs 90.8%, p < 0.001) follow-ups. The baseline Neck Disability Index (NDI) was an independent predictor of new postoperative neck pain at both the 12-month and 24-month time points (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06; p = 0.002; and aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.026, respectively). The total number of levels treated was associated with new-onset neck pain at 12 months (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09-1.64; p = 0.005), and duration of symptoms more than 3 months was a predictor of 24-month neck pain (aOR 3.22, 95% CI 1.01-10.22; p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Increased NDI at baseline, number of levels treated surgically, and duration of symptoms longer than 3 months preoperatively correlate positively with the risk of new-onset neck pain following CSM surgery. The majority of patients with new-onset neck pain still report satisfaction from surgery, suggesting that the risk of new-onset neck pain should not hinder indicated operations from being performed.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy with severe axial neck pain: is anterior or posterior approach better?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF) is superior for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and high preoperative neck pain. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data using the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM module. Patients who received a subaxial fusion of 3 or 4 segments and had a visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain score of 7 or greater at baseline were included. The 3-, 12-, and 24-month outcomes were compared for patients undergoing ACDF with those undergoing PCLF. RESULTS: Overall, 1141 patients with CSM were included in the database. Of these, 495 (43.4%) presented with severe neck pain (VAS score > 6). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we compared 65 patients (54.6%) undergoing 3- and 4-level ACDF and 54 patients (45.4%) undergoing 3- and 4-level PCLF. Patients undergoing ACDF had worse Neck Disability Index scores at baseline (52.5 ± 15.9 vs 45.9 ± 16.8, p = 0.03) but similar neck pain (p > 0.05). Otherwise, the groups were well matched for the remaining baseline patient-reported outcomes. The rates of 24-month follow-up for ACDF and PCLF were similar (86.2% and 83.3%, respectively). At the 24-month follow-up, both groups demonstrated mean improvements in all outcomes, including neck pain (p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, there was no significant difference in the degree of neck pain change, rate of neck pain improvement, rate of pain-free achievement, and rate of reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in neck pain between the two groups (adjusted p > 0.05). However, ACDF was associated with a higher 24-month modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) score (ß = 1.5 [95% CI 0.5-2.6], adjusted p = 0.01), higher EQ-5D score (ß = 0.1 [95% CI 0.01-0.2], adjusted p = 0.04), and higher likelihood for return to baseline activities (OR 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.4], adjusted p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Severe neck pain is prevalent among patients undergoing surgery for CSM, affecting more than 40% of patients. Both ACDF and PCLF achieved comparable postoperative neck pain improvement 3, 12, and 24 months following 3- or 4-segment surgery for patients with CSM and severe neck pain. However, multilevel ACDF was associated with superior functional status, quality of life, and return to baseline activities at 24 months in multivariable adjusted analyses.

Association Between the Cervical Extensor Musculature and the Demographic Features, Symptoms, and Sagittal Balance in Patients with Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain the quantitative measurements of the muscle morphology of cervical extensors in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy, and determine whether the morphological parameter of each muscle correlates with the patients' demographic features, symptoms, and cervical sagittal balance. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 100 hospitalized patients scheduled to undergo surgery for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Demographic data, including age, sex, and body mass index, were recorded, and symptoms were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scale scores. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the multifidus, semispinalis capitis, semispinalis cervicis, splenius capitis and splenius cervicis were measured on magnetic resonance imaging. The CSA of the total extensor muscles, deep extensor muscles (DEM, consisting of multifidus and semispinalis capitis), and superficial extensor muscles (consisting of semispinalis cervicis, splenius capitis and splenius cervicis) were calculated. The adjusted CSA (aCSA) was calculated as the CSA of the muscle/CSA of the corresponding vertebral body. The fat infiltration ratio (FIR) of the posterior extensor muscles was assessed using a pseudocoloring technique. Sagittal parameters, including cervical lordosis (CL), C2-7 cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1-slope, mismatch between T1-slope and CL (T1S-CL), and range of motion, were measured. The measured parameters were compared between the males and the females, between the patients with higher muscle aCSA and the patients with lower muscle aCSA, and between the patients with and without sagittal balance. A Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to determine the correlations between the paraspinal muscle measurements, and the clinical and radiographic parameters. RESULTS: There were 67 males and 33 females in this study, and the mean age was 59.22 ± 9.54 years. Compared with females, male patients showed higher CSA and aCSA of extensor muscles. Patients with lower muscle aCSA were significantly older and had worse NDI scores, with significantly greater C2-7 SVA and T1S-CL. Patients with sagittal imbalance showed significantly lower aCSA of total extensor muscles and DEM, as well as a significantly higher FIR. Age was significantly correlated with the aCSA of each measured muscle and the FIR. The aCSA of the DEM was correlated with the NDI score, the visual analog scale score, the SVA, the T1-slope, and the T1S-CL. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multilevel CSM, age and sex were demographic factors that were highly correlated with muscle morphology changes. Extensor muscles, especially DEM, play important roles in maintaining cervical sagittal balance and are associated with the severity of neck symptoms.