"Curtain-fall" technique for cerebrospinal fluid leak prevention after removal of intradural drainage. Technical note: application in chronic subdural hematoma surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is frequently met in neurosurgical practice and often need urgent surgical treatment in case of neurological deterioration. Different surgical approaches to evacuate CSDH are described in the literature. In our experience, an external drainage system is crucial in order to avoid recurrences. We recently encountered a case of subcutaneous CSF collection after drainage removal. Thus, we developed a simple surgical technique to prevent postoperative CSF leak after subdural drainage system removal. METHOD: We have developed a technique in which the periosteum is harvested during the surgery prior to the evacuation of the hemorrhage and fixed with sutures on the uncut dura mater opposite and laterally to the exit of the catheter exiting the dural hole caused by the passage of the Jackson-Pratt subdural drainage system. When the drainage catheter is removed, the flap, partially held by the sutures, falls over the hole avoiding CSF leakage. By using this technique, the small dural hole will be covered with the periosteum allowing for natural closure and wound healing hence preventing CSF leakage. RESULTS: This technique was successfully employed in 21 patients who didn't develop postoperative CSF leakage following CSDH evacuation and removal of subdural drainage system. CONCLUSION: In this technical note, we describe a safe dura closure technique that we developed to help reduce the risk of postoperative CSF leakage following subdural drainage removal, which can, however, also be applied in all surgeries in which a catheter is placed in the subdural space.

Local anesthesia with sedation and general anesthesia for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the primary treatment for chronic subdural hematoma, and anesthesia significantly impacts the surgery's outcomes. A previous systematic review compared general anesthesia to local anesthesia in 319 patients. Our study builds upon this research, analyzing 4,367 cases to provide updated and rigorous evidence. METHODS: We systematically searched five electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science, to identify eligible comparative studies. All studies published until September 2023 were included in our analysis. We compared six primary outcomes between the two groups using Review Manager Software. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving a total of 4,367 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis revealed no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of 'recurrence rate' (OR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.78 to 1.15], P = 0.59), 'mortality rate' (OR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.55 to 1.88], P = 0.96), and 'reoperation rate' (OR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.5 to 1.79], P = 0.87). Local anesthesia demonstrated superiority with a lower 'complications rate' than general anesthesia, as the latter had almost 2.4 times higher odds of experiencing complications (OR = 2.4, 95% CI [1.81 to 3.17], P < 0.00001). Additionally, local anesthesia was associated with a shorter 'length of hospital stay' (SMD = 1.19, 95% CI [1.06 to 1.32], P < 0.00001) and a reduced 'duration of surgery' (SMD = 0.94, 95% CI [0.67 to 1.2], P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Surgery for chronic subdural hematoma under local anesthesia results in fewer complications, a shorter length of hospital stay, and a shorter duration of the operation.

Middle meningeal artery patency after surgical evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) often requires surgical evacuation, but recurrence rates remain high. Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization (MMAE) has been proposed as an alternative or adjunct treatment. There is concern that prior surgery might limit patency, access, penetration, and efficacy of MMAE, such that some recent trials excluded patients with prior craniotomy. However, the impact of prior open surgery on MMA patency has not been studied. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent MMAE for cSDH (2019-2022), after prior surgical evacuation or not. MMA patency was assessed using a six-point grading scale. RESULTS: Of the 109 MMAEs (84 patients, median age 72 years, 20.2% females), 58.7% were upfront MMAEs, while 41.3% were after prior surgery (20 craniotomies, 25 burr holes). Median hematoma thickness was 14 mm and midline shift 3 mm. Hematoma thickness reduction, surgical rescue, and functional outcome did not differ between MMAE subgroups and were not affected by MMA patency or total area of craniotomy or burr-holes. MMA patency was reduced in the craniotomy group only, specifically in the distal portion of the anterior division (p = 0.005), and correlated with craniotomy area (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MMA remains relatively patent after burr-hole evacuation of cSDH, while craniotomy typically only affects the frontal-distal division. However, MMA patency, evacuation method, and total area do not affect outcomes. These findings support the use of MMAE regardless of prior surgery and may influence future trial inclusion/exclusion criteria. Further studies are needed to optimize the timing and techniques for MMAE in cSDH management.

Risk stratification and predictive modeling of postoperative delirium in chronic subdural hematoma.

Background- Postoperative delirium is a common complication associated with the elderly, causing increased morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. However, its risk factors in chronic subdural hematoma patients have not been well studied. Methods- A total of 202 consecutive patients with chronic subdural hematoma at Peking University Third Hospital between January 2018 and January 2023 were enrolled. Various clinical indicators were analyzed to identify independent risk factors for postoperative delirium using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Delirium risk prediction models were developed as a nomogram and a Markov chain. Results- Out of the 202 patients (age, 71 (IQR, 18); female-to-male ratio, 1:2.7) studied, 63 (31.2%) experienced postoperative delirium. Univariate analysis identified age (p < 0.001), gender (p = 0.014), restraint belt use (p < 0.001), electrolyte imbalance (p < 0.001), visual analog scale score (p < 0.001), hematoma thickness (p < 0.001), midline shift (p < 0.001), hematoma side (p = 0.013), hematoma location (p = 0.018), and urinal catheterization (p = 0.028) as significant factors. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed the significance of restraint belt use (B = 7.657, p < 0.001), electrolyte imbalance (B = -3.993, p = 0.001), visual analog scale score (B = 2.331, p = 0.016), and midline shift (B = 0.335, p = 0.007). Hematoma thickness and age had no significant impact. Conclusion- Increased midline shift and visual analog scale scores, alongside restraint belt use and electrolyte imbalance elevate delirium risk in chronic subdural hematoma surgery. Our prediction models may offer reference value in this context.

Challenges and patient outcomes in chronic subdural haematoma at the level of a regional care system A multi-centre, mixed-methods study from the East of England.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural haematoma (cSDH) is a common neurosurgical pathology affecting older patients with other health conditions. A significant proportion (up-to 90%) of referrals for surgery in neurosciences units (NSU) come from secondary care. However, the organisation of this care and the experience of patients repatriated to non-specialist centres are currently unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to clarify patient outcome in non-specialist centres following NSU discharge for cSDH surgery and to understand key system challenges. The study was set within a representative neurosurgical care system in the east of England. DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients referred for cSDH surgery. Alongside case record review, patient and staff experience were explored using surveys as well as an interactive c-design workshop. Challenges were identified from thematic analysis of survey responses and triangulated by focussed workshop discussions. RESULTS: Data on 381 patients referred for cSDH surgery from six centres was reviewed. One hundred and fifty-six (41%) patients were repatriated following surgery. Sixty-one (39%) of those repatriated suffered an inpatient complication (new infection, troponin rise or renal injury) following NSU discharge, with 58 requiring institutional discharge or new care. Surveys for staff (n = 42) and patients (n = 209) identified that resourcing, communication, and inter-hospital distance posed care challenges. This was corroborated through workshop discussions with stakeholders from two institutions. CONCLUSIONS: A significant amount of perioperative care for cSDH is delivered outside of specialist centres. Future improvement initiatives must recognise the system-wide nature of delivery and the challenges such an arrangement presents.

A randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of a two-week course of dexamethasone for adult patients with a symptomatic Chronic Subdural Haematoma (Dex-CSDH trial).

Background: Chronic subdural haematoma is a collection of 'old blood' and its breakdown products in the subdural space and predominantly affects older people. Surgical evacuation remains the mainstay in the management of symptomatic cases. Objective: The Dex-CSDH (DEXamethasone in Chronic SubDural Haematoma) randomised trial investigated the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone in patients with a symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma. Design: This was a parallel, superiority, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Assigned treatment was administered in a double-blind fashion. Outcome assessors were also blinded to treatment allocation. Setting: Neurosurgical units in the UK. Participants: Eligible participants included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) admitted to a neurosurgical unit with a symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma confirmed on cranial imaging. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 allocation to a 2-week tapering course of dexamethasone or placebo alongside standard care. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the Modified Rankin Scale score at 6 months dichotomised to a favourable (score of 0-3) or an unfavourable (score of 4-6) outcome. Secondary outcomes included the Modified Rankin Scale score at discharge and 3 months; number of chronic subdural haematoma-related surgical interventions undertaken during the index and subsequent admissions; Barthel Index and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level utility index score reported at discharge, 3 months and 6 months; Glasgow Coma Scale score reported at discharge and 6 months; mortality at 30 days and 6 months; length of stay; discharge destination; and adverse events. An economic evaluation was also undertaken, during which the net monetary benefit was estimated at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Results: A total of 748 patients were included after randomisation: 375 were assigned to dexamethasone and 373 were assigned to placebo. The mean age of the patients was 74 years and 94% underwent evacuation of their chronic subdural haematoma during the trial period. A total of 680 patients (91%) had 6-month primary outcome data available for analysis: 339 in the placebo arm and 341 in the dexamethasone arm. On a modified intention-to-treat analysis of the full study population, there was an absolute reduction in the proportion of favourable outcomes of 6.4% (95% confidence interval 11.4% to 1.4%; p = 0.01) in the dexamethasone arm compared with the control arm at 6 months. At 3 months, the between-group difference was also in favour of placebo (-8.2%, 95% confidence interval -13.3% to -3.1%). Serious adverse events occurred in 60 out of 375 (16.0%) in the dexamethasone arm and 24 out of 373 (6.4%) in the placebo arm. The net monetary benefit of dexamethasone compared with placebo was estimated to be -£97.19. Conclusions: This trial reports a higher rate of unfavourable outcomes at 6 months, and a higher rate of serious adverse events, in the dexamethasone arm than in the placebo arm. Dexamethasone was also not estimated to be cost-effective. Therefore, dexamethasone cannot be recommended for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma in this population group. Future work and limitations: A total of 94% of individuals underwent surgery, meaning that this trial does not fully define the role of dexamethasone in conservatively managed haematomas, which is a potential area for future study. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN80782810. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 13/15/02) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Chronic subdural haematoma is one of the most common conditions managed in adult neurosurgery and mainly affects older people. It is an 'old' collection of blood and blood breakdown products found on the surface of the brain. Surgery to drain the liquid collection is effective, with most patients improving. Given that inflammation is involved in the disease process, a commonly used steroid, dexamethasone, has been used alongside surgery or instead of surgery since the 1970s. However, there is no consensus or high-quality studies confirming the effectiveness of dexamethasone for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma. This study was designed to determine the effectiveness of adding dexamethasone to the normal treatment for patients with a symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma. The benefit of adding dexamethasone was measured using a disability score called the Modified Rankin Scale, which can be divided into favourable and unfavourable outcomes. This was assessed at 6 months after entry into the study. In total, 748 adults with a symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma treated in neurosurgical units in the UK participated. Each participant had an equal chance of receiving either dexamethasone or a placebo because they were assigned randomly. Neither the patients nor the investigators knew who received dexamethasone and who received placebo. Most patients in both groups had an operation to drain the haematoma and experienced significant functional improvement at 6 months compared with their initial admission to hospital. However, patients who received dexamethasone had a lower chance than patients who received placebo of favourable recovery at 6 months. Specifically, 84% of patients who received dexamethasone had recovered well at 6 months, compared with 90% of patients who received placebo. There were more complications in the group that received dexamethasone. This trial demonstrates that adding dexamethasone to standard treatment reduced the chance of a favourable outcome compared with standard treatment alone. Therefore, this study does not support the use of dexamethasone in treating patients with a symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma.

Incidence of surgically treated chronic subdural hematoma after head injury with normal initial computed tomography.

PURPOSE: The objective was to determine the incidence of surgically treated chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) within six months after head trauma in a consecutive series of head injury patients with a normal initial computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 1941 adult patients with head injuries who underwent head CT within 48 h after injury and were treated at the Tampere University Hospital's emergency department were retrospectively evaluated from medical records (median age = 59 years, IQR = 39-79 years, males = 58%, patients using antithrombotic medication = 26%). Patients with no signs of acute traumatic intracranial pathology or any type of subdural collection on initial head CT were regarded as CT negative (n = 1573, 81%). RESULTS: Two (n = 2) of the 1573 CT negative patients received surgical treatment for cSDH. Consequently, the incidence of surgically treated cSDH after a normal initial head CT during a six-month follow-up was 0.13%. Both patients sustained mild traumatic brain injuries initially. One of the two patients was on antithrombotic medication (warfarin) at the time of trauma, hence incidence of surgically treated cSDH among patients with antithrombotic medication in CT negative patients (n = 376, 23.9%) was 0.27%. Additionally, within CT negative patients, one subdural hygroma was operated shortly after trauma. CONCLUSION: The extremely low incidence of surgically treated cSDH after a normal initial head CT, even in patients on antithrombotic medication, supports the notion that routine follow-up imaging after an initial normal head CT is not indicated to exclude the development of cSDH. Additionally, our findings support the concept of cSDH not being a purely head trauma-related disease.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma.

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a prevalent medical condition with potentially severe consequences if left untreated. While surgical removal has traditionally been the standard approach for treatment, middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization has emerged as a promising minimally invasive alternative to reduce recurrences. This comprehensive review provides the general radiology community with an overview of MMA embolization as a therapeutic option for managing CSDH. The authors base their insights on existing evidence and their institutional experience. This overview encompasses the pathophysiology of CSDH as well as the potential advantages and limitations, safety profile, and potential complications of MMA embolization as compared with surgical treatment. The imaging findings seen before and after MMA, as well as insights into the procedural techniques used at the authors' institution, are described. On the basis of reports in the current literature, MMA embolization appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option for managing CSDH, especially in patients who are unsuitable for surgery or at risk for recurrence. Nonetheless, further research is needed to validate these findings. Results from ongoing clinical trials hold promise for future validation and the establishment of scientific evidence. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Chatterjee in this issue.

Irrigation versus no irrigation in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 1581 patients.

Burr hole craniotomy is a common technique employed in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. However, its effectiveness and the occurrence of additional complications with various irrigation techniques utilized during the surgery remain unclear. The paper aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of burr hole craniotomy with and without irrigation in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. We conducted a systematic review by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid, and Web of Science for comparative studies that fit the eligibility criteria. All studies up to January 2023 were included, and the two groups were compared based on five primary outcomes using Review Manager Software. Data reported as odds ratio (OR) or risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Our analysis included 12 studies with a total of 1581 patients. There was no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of recurrence rate (OR = 0.94; 95% CI [0.55, 1.06], p-value = 0.81) and mortality rate (RR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.46, 2.40], p-value = 0.91). Similarly, there was no significant difference in postoperative infection (RR = 1.15, 95% CI [0.16, 8.05], p-value = 0.89) or postoperative pneumocephalus (RR = 2.56, 95% CI [0.95, 6.89], p-value = 0.06). The burr hole drainage with irrigation technique was insignificantly associated with a higher risk of postoperative hemorrhagic complication (RR = 2.23, 95% CI [0.94, 5.29], p-value = 0.07); however, sensitivity analysis showed significant association based on the results of two studies (RR = 4.6, 95% CI [1.23, 17.25], p-value = 0.024). The two techniques showed comparable recurrence, mortality rate, postoperative infection, and postoperative pneumocephalus results. However, irrigation in burr hole craniotomy could possibly have a higher risk of postoperative hemorrhage compared with no irrigation, as observed during sensitivity analysis, which requires to be confirmed by other studies. Further research and randomized controlled trials are required to understand these observations better and their applicability in clinical practice.

Treatment of chronic subdural haematoma.

A further rise in chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) prevalence is expected with an ageing population, and evidence-based guidelines are needed to direct treatment, while creating a platform for research. The Danish Chronic Subdural Hematoma Study (DACSUHS) has implemented the first Danish national CSDH guidelines in 2018 and have standardised CSDH management on a national level. Based on CSDH literature published between 2016 and 2022, these guidelines were updated in 2022. The updated guidelines are presented in this review.

The value of computed tomography texture analysis in identifying chronic subdural hematoma patients with a good response to polytherapy.

This study aimed to investigate the predictive factors of therapeutic efficacy for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) patients receiving atorvastatin combined with dexamethasone therapy by using clinical imaging characteristics in conjunction with computed tomography (CT) texture analysis (CTTA). Clinical imaging characteristics and CT texture parameters at admission were retrospectively investigated in 141 CSDH patients who received atorvastatin combined with dexamethasone therapy from June 2019 to December 2022. The patients were divided into a training set (n = 81) and a validation set (n = 60). Patients in the training data were divided into two groups based on the effectiveness of the treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the potential factors that could indicate the prognosis of CSDH patients in the training set. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the predictive efficacy of the significant factors in predicting the prognosis of CSDH patients and was validated using a validation set. The multivariate analysis showed that the hematoma density to brain parenchyma density ratio, singal min (minimum) and singal standard deviation of the pixel distribution histogram, and inhomogeneity were independent predictors for the prognosis of CSDH patients based on atorvastatin and dexamethasone therapy. The area under the ROC curve between the two groups was between 0.716 and 0.806. As determined by significant factors, the validation's accuracy range was 0.816 to 0.952. Clinical imaging characteristics in conjunction with CTTA could aid in distinguishing patients with CSDH who responded well to atorvastatin combined with dexamethasone.

Passive or active drainage system for chronic subdural haematoma-a single-center retrospective follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative drainage systems have become a standard treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). We previously compared treatment results from three Scandinavian centers using three different postoperative drainage systems and concluded that the active subgaleal drainage was associated with lower recurrence and complication rates than the passive subdural drainage. We consequently changed clinical practice from using the passive subdural drainage to the active subgaleal drainage. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess a potential change in reoperation rates for CSDH after conversion to the active subgaleal drainage. METHODS: This single-center cohort study compared the reoperation rates for recurrent same-sided CSDH and postoperative complication rates between patients treated during two study periods (passive subdural drainage cohort versus active subgaleal drainage cohort). RESULTS: In total, 594 patients were included in the study. We found no significant difference in reoperation rates between the passive subdural drain group and the active subgaleal drain group (21.6%, 95% CI 17.5-26.4% vs. 18.0%, 95% CI 13.8-23.2%; p = 0.275). There was no statistical difference in the rate of serious complications between the groups. The operating time was significantly shorter for patients operated with the active subgaleal drain than patients with the passive subdural drain (32.8 min, 95% CI 31.2-34.5 min vs. 47.6 min, 95% CI 44.7-50.4 min; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from the passive subdural to the active subgaleal drainage did not result in a clear reduction of reoperation rates for CSDH in our center.

AI-Based Approach to One-Click Chronic Subdural Hematoma Segmentation Using Computed Tomography Images.

This paper presents a computer vision-based approach to chronic subdural hematoma segmentation that can be performed by one click. Chronic subdural hematoma is estimated to occur in 0.002-0.02% of the general population each year and the risk increases with age, with a high frequency of about 0.05-0.06% in people aged 70 years and above. In our research, we developed our own dataset, which includes 53 series of CT scans collected from 21 patients with one or two hematomas. Based on the dataset, we trained two neural network models based on U-Net architecture to automate the manual segmentation process. One of the models performed segmentation based only on the current frame, while the other additionally processed multiple adjacent images to provide context, a technique that is more similar to the behavior of a doctor. We used a 10-fold cross-validation technique to better estimate the developed models' efficiency. We used the Dice metric for segmentation accuracy estimation, which was 0.77. Also, for testing our approach, we used scans from five additional patients who did not form part of the dataset, and created a scenario in which three medical experts carried out a hematoma segmentation before we carried out segmentation using our best model. We developed the OsiriX DICOM Viewer plugin to implement our solution into the segmentation process. We compared the segmentation time, which was more than seven times faster using the one-click approach, and the experts agreed that the segmentation quality was acceptable for clinical usage.

Efficacy and safety of bedside percutaneous three-millimeter twist-drill trephination under local anesthesia-a retrospective study of 1000 patients.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous 3-mm twist-drill trephination (TDT) under local anesthesia as a bedside operative technique is an alternative to the conventional open surgical trephination in the operating theatre. The aim of this study was to verify the efficacy and safety of this minimal invasive procedure. METHODS: This retrospective study comprises 1000 patients who were treated with TDT under local anesthesia at bedside due to chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and hydrocephalus (HYD) as a result of subarachnoid hemorrhage or non-hemorrhagic causes, increased intracranial pressure (IIP) in traumatic brain injury or non-traumatic brain edema, and other pathologies (OP) requiring drainage. Medical records, clinical outcome, and results of pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) were analyzed. RESULTS: Indications for TDT were cSDH (n = 275; 27.5%), ICH (n = 291; 29.1%), HYD (n = 316; 31.6%), IIP (n = 112; 11.2%), and OP (n = 6; 0.6%). Overall, primary catheter placement was sufficient in 93.8% of trephinations. Complication rate was 14.1% and mainly related to primary catheter malposition (6.2%), infections (5.2%), and secondary hemorrhage (2.7%); the majority of which were clinically inapparent puncture channel bleedings not requiring surgical intervention. The revision rate was 13%. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside TDT under local anesthesia has proven to be an effective and safe alternative to the conventional burr-hole operative technique as usually performed under general anesthesia in the operation theatre, and may be particularly useful in emergency cases as well as in elderly and multimorbid patients.

Are there characteristic indicators for increased pressure in chronic subdural hematoma?

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical disorders. However, no study has yet documented biomarkers indicating increased CSDH pressure. This study aimed to explore such indicators. A total of 50 patients underwent measurement for CSDH pressure during burr-hole irrigation. The mean hematoma pressure was 16.8 ± 7.6 cmH2O with no significant difference between new-onset and recurrent CSDHs. In 12 patients with a CSDH pressure ≥25 cmH2O, further analyses were carried out. Eight of them had bilateral CSDHs. All six patients with a CSDH pressure ≥28 cmH2O suffered headaches before surgery. Two out of three patients with a CSDH pressure ≥29 cmH2O felt nauseous. In statistical analyses, headache was positively correlated with a high CSDH pressure, whereas age and hematoma thickness were negatively correlated with it. Patients' sex, initial Glasgow coma scale score, motor weakness, midline shift on computed tomography scans, and administration of anticoagulants/antiplatelet agents, showed no significant correlation. When patients with bilateral CSDHs are not older adults and suffering headaches, an increased CSDH pressure should be assumed. For such patients, a prompt hematoma evacuation is indicated.