Aniseikonia and retinal morphological changes in eyes undergoing macular hole surgery.

Even after idiopathic macular hole (MH) surgery and with successful closure of MH, aniseikonia is a common postoperative symptom. We investigated the correlation of MH diameter, retinal displacement and retinal layer thicknesses with aniseikonia in 41 eyes of 41 patients undergoing MH surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling. Aniseikonia was measured with the New Aniseikonia Test. Retinal displacement (RD%) was defined as change of retinal distance between the temporal margin of the optic papilla and the intersection of the retinal vessels. Changes of thicknesses of the inner nuclear layer (INL%) and the outer retinal layer (OR%) were calculated. Aniseikonia improved postoperatively. Preoperative aniseikonia and their improvement at 6 months correlated with MH diameters (P = 0.004-0.046). Improvement of aniseikonia correlated with temporal RD% (P = 0.002-0.012). Improvement of vertical aniseikonia correlated with INL% at 2 weeks and with the nasal OR% at 1, 3, and 6 months (P = < 0.001-0.028). MH diameter and age were significant predictors for improvement of aniseikonia. The greater the temporal retina displacement, and the thinner the postoperative INL and OR, the greater the improvement of aniseikonia. MH diameter and age are strong predictors for improvement of aniseikonia after MH surgery.

Effects of induced aniseikonia on binocular visual acuity.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Binocular visual acuity is an important index of functional performance. Optometrists need to know how binocular visual acuity is affected by aniseikonia, and whether reduced binocular visual acuity is a marker for aniseikonia. BACKGROUND: Aniseikonia, the perception of unequal image sizes between the eyes, can occur spontaneously or can be induced after different types of eye surgery, or trauma. It is known to affect binocular vision, but there are no prior studies about how it affects visual acuity. METHODS: Visual acuity was measured for 10 healthy well-corrected participants aged 18-21 years of age. Aniseikonia of up to 20% was induced in one of two ways: (1) size lenses, which provided minification of field of view in one eye of each participant and (2) polaroid filters, which allowed vectographic viewing of optotypes on a 3D computer monitor. The best corrected acuity was measured on conventional logarithmic progression format vision charts and isolated optotypes, under both induced aniseikonia conditions. RESULTS: Induced aniseikonia caused binocular visual acuity thresholds to increase by small but statistically significant amounts, with the largest deficit being 0.06 logMAR for 20% size differences between the eyes. Binocular visual acuity was worse than monocular visual acuity for aniseikonia of 9% and greater. Acuity measured with the vectographic presentation gave slightly higher thresholds (by 0.01 logMAR) than for those viewed with size lenses. Acuity measured with charts gave slightly higher thresholds (by 0.02 logMAR) than with isolated letters. CONCLUSION: An acuity change of 0.06 logMAR is small and may be missed in a clinical examination. Therefore, visual acuity cannot be used as a marker of aniseikonia in clinical settings. Even with very marked induced aniseikonia, binocular visual acuity remained well within standards for licen*c*sing of drivers.

Aniseikonia after reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy.

This study investigated aniseikonia after reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy (RFPDT) for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). We examined 48 eyes of 48 patients (38 men; mean age, 49.2 ± 9.9 years) with CSC resolved after RFPDT. Horizontal and vertical aniseikonia were measured using the New Aniseikonia Test at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after RFPDT. The maximum absolute value of the horizontal and vertical measurements indicated the aniseikonia score. The aniseikonia score was 2.2 ± 2.3 at 6 months and 2.2 ± 2.0 at 12 months after RFPDT, both of which improved significantly from the baseline score of 4.1 ± 2.9 (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). The 12-month aniseikonia score significantly correlated with the baseline aniseikonia score (P = 0.047), outer nuclear thickness at baseline (P = 0.027) and 12 months after RFPDT (P = 0.014), baseline SRD area (P = 0.005), and ellipsoid zone disruption at 12 months after RFPDT (P = 0.021). In multivariate analysis, baseline serous retinal detachment (SRD) area (P = 0.034) was significantly associated with aniseikonia score at 12 months after RFPDT. Eyes with a larger SRD area might have higher aniseikonia scores even after SRD resolution following RFPDT.

Retinal Displacement after Scleral Buckle versus Combined Buckle and Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: ALIGN Scleral Buckle versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Scleral Buckle.

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of retinal displacement after scleral buckle (SB) versus pars plana vitrectomy with SB (PPV-SB). DESIGN: Multicenter prospective nonrandomized clinical trial. METHODS: The study took place at VitreoRetinal Surgery in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Sankara Nethralaya in Chennai, India, and St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Canada from July 2019 to February 2022. Patients who underwent successful SB or PPV-SB for fovea-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with gradable postoperative fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging were included in the final analysis. Two masked graders assessed FAF images 3 months postoperatively. Metamorphopsia and aniseikonia were assessed with M-CHARTs and the New Aniseikonia Test, respectively. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with retinal displacement detected with retinal vessel printings on FAF in SB versus PPV-SB. RESULTS: Ninety-one eyes were included in this study, of which 46.2% (42 of 91) had SB and 53.8% (49 of 91) underwent PPV-SB. Three months postoperatively, 16.7% (7 of 42) in the SB group and 38.8% (19 of 49) in the PPV-SB group had evidence of retinal displacement (difference = 22.1%; odds ratio = 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-8.6; P = 0.02) on FAF. The statistical significance of this association increased after adjustment for extent of retinal detachment, baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, lens status, and sex in a multivariate regression analysis (P = 0.01). Retinal displacement was detected in 22.5% (6 of 27) of patients in the SB group with external subretinal fluid drainage and 6.7% (1 of 15) of patients without external drainage (difference = 15.8%; odds ratio = 4.0; 95% CI, 0.4-36.9; P = 0.19). Mean vertical metamorphopsia, horizontal metamorphopsia (MH), and aniseikonia were similar between patients in the SB and PPV-SB groups. There was a trend to worse MH in patients with retinal displacement versus those without retinal displacement (P = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: Scleral buckle is associated with less retinal displacement compared with PPV-SB, indicating that traditional PPV techniques cause retinal displacement. There is a trend toward increased risk of retinal displacement in SB eyes that underwent external drainage compared with SB eyes without drainage, which is consistent with our understanding that the iatrogenic movement of subretinal fluid, such as that which occurs intraoperatively during external drainage with SB, may induce retinal stretch and displacement if the retina is then fixed in the stretched position. There was a trend to worse MH at 3 months in patients with retinal displacement. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY MORPHOLOGY AFTER RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR: ALIGN Post Hoc Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare foveal avascular zone (FAZ) geometric indices using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) versus pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). FAZ morphology was assessed as a possible imaging feature of retinal displacement. METHODS: This ALIGN post hoc analysis included primary fovea-off RRDs that underwent successful PnR or PPV, and performed OCTA, and fundus autofluorescence at (FAF) 3 months postoperatively at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. FAZ area (mm 2 ), axial ratio, circularity, and roundness were measured, and FAF images were assessed for retinal displacement. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included, 78% (56/72) were male mean age was 60 ± 9 years, and 60% (43/72) were phakic. Sixty-five percent (47/72) and 35% (25/72) underwent PnR and PPV, respectively. The mean baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity was 1.49 ± 0.76. FAZ circularity was lower after PPV (0.629 ± 0.120) versus PnR (0.703 ± 0.122); P = 0.016. Sixty-six patients had gradable FAF images. Retinal displacement was present in 29% (19/66), 84.2% (16/19) of which had displacement in the macula. FAZ circularity was lower in eyes with displacement in the macula (0.613 ± 0.110) versus those without displacement (0.700 ± 0.124); P = 0.015. There was a moderate negative correlation between 12-month aniseikonia and FAZ circularity(r = -0.262; P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: FAZ circularity was lower after PPV and in eyes with retinal displacement in the macula. Circularity was negatively correlated with 12-month aniseikonia scores. FAZ circularity may be another imaging feature to consider postoperatively after RRD repair.

LONG-TERM CHANGES IN VISUAL FUNCTION AND EN FACE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY FINDINGS IN FOVEA-OFF RETINAL DETACHMENT: A 2-Year Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term changes in visual function and outer retinal abnormalities on en face optical coherence tomography after fovea-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and to assess associations between functional outcomes and outer retinal abnormalities. METHODS: Prospective, observational study. The following data were collected at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after retinal reattachment: Best-corrected visual acuity, metamorphopsia (M-CHARTS), aniseikonia (New Aniseikonia Test), altered ellipsoid zone reflectivity, outer retinal folds, macular detachment demarcation, and subfoveal fluid. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included. Best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly from 1 to 12 months and from 12 to 24 months (P < 0.001; P = 0.022). Vertical and horizontal metamorphopsia improved significantly from 1 to 12 months (P < 0.001; P = 0.002), and at 24 months, scores of ≥0.2° were present in 54% and 42% of patients, respectively. The degree of aniseikonia did not change. Best-corrected visual acuity and aniseikonia scores were positively associated with outer retinal fold (r 0.4, P = 0.009; r 0.4, P = 0.048). A gradual normalization of outer retinal reflectivity took place during 24 months. CONCLUSION: Visual acuity improved significantly during the second year after reattachment surgery for fovea-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, in parallel with normalization of outer retinal abnormalities on en face optical coherence tomography. Metamorphopsia did not improve after 12 months, and aniseikonia remained unchanged.

Radial and Tangential Retinal Magnifications as Functions of Visual Field Angle Across Spherical, Oblate, and Prolate Retinal Profiles.

Purpose: To provide a tool for calculating radial and tangential retinal magnifications as functions of field angle and retinal shape and to articulate patterns of magnification across the retina for monocular and binocular combinations of prolate-, oblate-, and spherical-shaped retinas. Methods: Formulae were derived to calculate radial and tangential retinal magnifications (mm/deg) from field angle (degrees), retinal asphericity (unitless conic constant), retinal vertex radius of curvature (mm), and nodal point position (mm). Monocular retinal magnifications were determined for eyes with prolate, spherical, and oblate retinas as functions of field angle. Bilateral differences in magnifications were examined for combinations of those eyes. Results: Retinal shape substantially affects magnification profiles even for eyes with the same axial length. Greatest magnification changes across a retina and between eyes, as well as greatest increase in radial-tangential differences (distortion), occur with prolate retinas. Binocular magnification differences were smallest for oblate retinas. Nodal points anterior to the vertex center of curvature and oblate asphericity both cause field-dependent reductions in magnification relative to the fovea (barrel distortion), whereas nodal points posterior to vertex center of curvature and prolate asphericity cause the opposite (pincushion distortion). Retinal magnification differences due to eye shape are much greater than aniseikonia thresholds and chromatic differences in magnification. A spreadsheet tool implements the magnification calculations. Conclusions: Local retinal magnifications as functions of field angle have substantial effects on objective applications (imaging retinal anatomy) and subjective experiences (aniseikonia) and quantify an ocular property that differs across eye shapes and refractive errors. Translational Relevance: Methods are provided to customize the calculation of radial and tangential magnifications across the retina for individual eyes, which will bolster the multifactorial study of the effects of foveal and peripheral optics across eye shapes and refractive errors.

[Disorders of the visual system following vitreoretinal and macular surgery]. / Störungen des visuellen Systems nach vitreoretinaler und makulärer Chirurgie.

The visual system is highly complex. Monocular or binocular disorders can develop, for example during tractive alterations of the macula, such as in epimacular membranes, and result in symptoms, such as double vision, aniseikonia or metamorphopsia. These symptoms are also observed following vitreomacular or vitreoretinal surgery, especially after treatment of large retinal detachment involving the macular area using pars plana vitrectomy or scleral buckle surgery but also as a result of vitreomacular interventions, such as membrane peeling in epimacular gliosis. Some patients have preoperatively existing latent conditions, which are not explicitly addressed during routine preoperative diagnostics. For patients and surgeons it is worth noting that these troublesome symptoms are often manifested in patients with good restoration of best corrected visual acuity following vitreomacular surgery. In such cases, patients tend to be dissatisfied with the surgical result despite good visual acuity. Treatment of postoperative metamorphopsia, aniseikonia and double vision is often difficult. In clinical studies, the maximum depth of tractive retinal folds has been described as a reliable morphological biomarker for the occurrence of metamorphopsia in epimacular gliosis. As metamorphopsia tends to postoperatively resolve slowly and even persist in ca. 30% of cases, this biomarker can have an impact on preoperative consulting and postoperative monitoring. Persistent binocular discomfort is often treatable by exact refraction correction and by applying a vertical and, if necessary, a horizontal prism. This often requires patience on the part of both the patient and the physician but is mostly successful due to fusion and adaptability.

Prediction of ocular magnification and aniseikonia after cataract surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ocular magnification and aniseikonia after cataract surgery has been widely ignored in modern cataract surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyse ocular magnification and inter-individual differences in a normal cataract population with a focus on monovision. METHODS: From a large dataset containing biometric measurements (IOLMaster 700) of both eyes of 9734 patients prior to cataract surgery, eyes were indexed randomly as primary (P) and secondary (S). Intraocular lens power (IOLP) was derived for the HofferQ, Haigis and Castrop formulae for emmetropia for P and emmetropia or myopia (-0.5 to -2 dpt) for S to simulate monovision. Based on the pseudophakic eye model in addition to these formulae, ocular magnification was extracted using matrix algebra (refraction and translation matrices and a system matrix describing the optical property of the entire spectacle corrected or uncorrected eye). RESULTS: With emmetropia for P and S the IOLP differences (S-P) showed a standard deviation of 0.162/0.156/0.157 dpt and ocular magnification differences yielded a standard deviation of 0.0414/0.0405/0.0408 mm/mrad for the HofferQ/Haigis/Castrop setting. Simulating monovision, the myopic eye (S) showed a systematically smaller mean absolute spectacle corrected ocular magnification than the emmetropic eye (-0.0351/-0.0340/-0.0336, respectively, relative magnification around 2%). If myopia in the S eye remains uncorrected, the reduction of ocular magnification is much smaller (around 0.2-0.3%). CONCLUSION: Vergence formulae for IOLP calculation sometimes implicitly define a pseudophakic eye model which can be directly used to predict ocular magnification after cataract surgery. Despite a strong similarity of both eyes, ocular magnification does not fully match between eyes and the prediction of ocular magnification and aniseikonia might be relevant to avoid eikonic problems in the pseudophakic eye.

Measuring aniseikonia and investigating neuroplasticity and image factors in amblyopia (MAGNIFY): study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Aniseikonia represents a potential barrier to neuroplasticity which may limit visual outcomes in children with anisometropic amblyopia. Full correction of refractive error is the first step in standard amblyopia treatment, which corrects for image focus but neglects image size differences. METHODS: The MAGNIFY study is a double-masked, randomised clinical trial investigating the effectiveness of aniseikonia correcting lenses in children at first diagnosis of significant anisometropia. We hypothesis that aniseikonia correction lenses will improve image clarity and reduce the retinal size differences producing better visual acuity and stereoacuity improvements after 15 weeks of optical treatment for children with anisometropia. Eligible children will be randomly allocated to the treatment group (aniseikonia-correcting spectacle lenses) or control group (standard spectacle lenses). Visual acuity and binocular functions will be assessed every 5 weeks during the 15-week optical treatment phase according to standard amblyopia treatment protocol. DISCUSSION: It is possible that correcting aniseikonia along with anisometropia at first diagnosis will promote binocularity as well as increase spectacle adherence by reducing visual discomfort, improving optical treatment outcomes. This could then reduce the need for additional amblyopia treatment such as patching or atropine, reducing the burden on hospital eye departments and potentially improving visual outcomes for children with amblyopia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12620000061932 . Registered on 24 January 2020. Protocol 15th November 2019, version one.

The effects of optically and digitally simulated aniseikonia on stereopsis.

PURPOSE: To simulate both lens-induced and screen-induced aniseikonia, and to assess its influence on stereopsis. Additionally, to determine if screen-based size differences could neutralise the effects of lens-induced aniseikonia. METHOD: A four-circle (4-C) paradigm was developed, where one circle appears in front or behind the others because of crossed or uncrossed disparity. This stereotest was used for three investigations: (1) Comparison with the McGill modified random dot stereogram (RDS), with anisometropia introduced with +2 D spheres and cylinders, and with aniseikonia introduced with 6% overall and 6% meridional (×180, ×90) magnifiers before the right eye; (2) Comparison of lens-induced and screen-induced 6% overall and meridional magnifications and (3) Determining if lens and screen effects neutralised, by opposing 6% lens-induced magnification to the right eye with screen-inducements of either 6% left eye magnification or 6% right eye minification. A pilot study of the effect of masking versus not masking the surround was also conducted. RESULTS: The 4-C test gave higher stereo-thresholds than the RDS test by 0.5 ± 0.2 log units across both anisometropic and aniseikonic conditions. However, variations in power, meridian and magnification affected the two tests similarly. The pilot study indicated that surround masking improved neutralisation of screen and lens effects. With masking, lens-induced and screen-induced magnifications increased stereo-thresholds similarly. With lens and screen effects opposed, for most participants stereo-thresholds returned to baseline for overall and ×180 magnifications, but not for ×90 magnification. Only three of seven participants showed good compensation for ×90 magnification. CONCLUSIONS: Effects of lens-induced aniseikonia on stereopsis cannot always be successfully simulated with a screen-based method. The ability to neutralise refractive aniseikonia using a computer-based method, which is the basis of digital clinical measurement, was reasonably successful for overall and ×180 meridional aniseikonia, but not very successful for ×90 aniseikonia.

Aniseikonia and visual functions with optical correction and after refractive surgery in axial anisometropia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in the subjective aniseikonia and stereoacuity in patients with axial anisometropia after full correction of the refractive error with spectacles, contact lenses, and refractive surgery. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in Cairo University Hospitals on 20 patients with axial anisometropia caused by unilateral myopia > 5 D with > 4 D inter-ocular difference in spherical equivalent who were suitable candidates for excimer laser ablation (LASIK) or implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL). All patients had measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fusion, stereoacuity, and magnitude of aniseikonia with spectacles, contact lenses, and after surgery. RESULTS: The mean age at time of surgery was 25.7 ± 3.1 years. There were no statistically significant differences in the BCVA or stereoacuity with spectacles, contact lenses, or after refractive surgery. Microkonia < 5%) was perceived with spectacles in 8 patients (40%) and remained unchanged in 7 of these 8 patients with contact lenses. Following LASIK (n = 11), there was an induced macrokonia < 2% in 4 patients (36%), persistent microkonia of 3% in 1 patient (9%), and no change in image size in 6 (55%) patients. Following ICL implantation (n = 9), there was a perceived macrokonia of 2% in 4 patients (44%), disappearance of microkonia in 1 patient (11%) and no change in 4 patients (44%). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in BCVA, stereoacuity, and aniseikonia after correction of anisometropia by glasses, contact lens and surgery are both clinically and statistically insignificant. Retinal or neural adaptation might have a role in correction for differences in image size.

Comparison of surgical outcomes after removal of epiretinal membrane associated with retinal break and idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

PURPOSE: To compare the surgical outcomes of epiretinal membranes (ERMs) associated with retinal break and idiopathic ERMs. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with an idiopathic ERM or an ERM associated with retinal break, who were followed up for ≥ 6 months after ERM removal. The postoperative functional and anatomical outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 160 and 38 eyes (198 patients) were in the idiopathic and retinal break groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the baseline anatomical and functional parameters between the groups. At 6 months after surgery and at the final follow-up, best-corrected visual acuity, central foveal thickness, and ectopic inner foveal layer improved significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. In latter 49.0% of patients, tests for metamorphopsia and aniseikonia were performed. There was a significant improvement in the scores of metamorphopsia (0.40 ± 0.38 to 0.27 ± 0.28; p < 0.001) and aniseikonia (6.07 ± 4.46 to 4.11 ± 3.52; p < 0.001) in the idiopathic group at 6 months after surgery, but not in the retinal break group. The idiopathic group had significantly greater circularity of ERM extent compared to the retinal break group (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Visual and anatomical improvements after removal of ERMs associated with retinal break and idiopathic ERMs were comparable. However, metamorphopsia and aniseikonia improved only after removal of idiopathic ERMs.

[Simple method to estimate object to image magnification and aniseikonia following cataract surgery]. / Einfaches Verfahren zur Abschätzung des postoperativen Abbildungsmaßstabs und der Aniseikonie bei der Kataraktoperation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aniseikonia as one of the major risk factors for asthenopic problems is mostly overlooked in modern cataract surgery. The purpose of this study was to develop a simple calculation scheme for clinicians to predict the object to image magnification in a pseudophakic eye with biometric data. METHODS: The calculation scheme for object to image magnification in the pseudophakic eye is based on a vergence calculation of the lens power with theoretical optical formulae. From the biometric data, which are typically derived from both eyes during lens power calculation, the vergences in front of and behind the 3 or 4 refractive surfaces of the pseudophakic eye model are used to predict the magnification for objects at infinity or objects located at a finite measurement distance (e.g. 5 m). RESULTS: With a formula-based lens power calculation a pseudophakic eye model is set up with 3 or 4 refractive surfaces (postoperative spectacle refraction; thick cornea described by anterior surface or thick cornea characterized by anterior and posterior surfaces; intraocular lens). The vergence in front of and behind each refractive surface is derived by means of linear Gaussian optics. The quotient of the product of all vergences in front of the surfaces and the product of all vergences behind the respective surfaces describes the object to image magnification of the eye. A comparison of the object to image magnification of both eyes yields the retinal image size disparity or aniseikonia. This calculation strategy is shown in a step-by-step approach exemplarily for the Haigis and Hoffer­Q formulae (3 surfaces) and the Castrop formula (4 surfaces). CONCLUSION: If during planning and lens power calculation biometry is performed for both eyes, ocular magnification of both eyes can be easily derived with this calculation scheme and aniseikonia can be extracted from a comparison of magnification of both eyes. Such a simple prediction should be established as a standard for precataract biometry and lens power calculation for early detection and avoidance of asthenopic complaints after cataract surgery.

Visual functions affecting stereopsis in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To quantify stereopsis and other visual functions in patients with unilateral branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and to investigate vision-related parameters that affect stereopsis. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SUBJECTS: Forty-five patients undergoing intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) treatment for unilateral BRVO. METHODS: We examined stereopsis using the Titmus stereo test (TST) and TNO stereotest (TNO), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), letter contrast sensitivity, severity of metamorphopsia and degree of aniseikonia before and 6 months after IVR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual functions that affect stereopsis. RESULTS: Baseline stereopsis in patients with BRVO was 2.7 ± 0.6 (range, 1.6-3.5) in the TST and 2.8 ± 0.5 (range, 1.8-3.3) in TNO. TST and TNO scores were significantly correlated with BCVA and letter contrast sensitivity at baseline (P < 0.001) but not with other visual functions. IVR treatment significantly improved stereopsis, BCVA, and letter contrast sensitivity. After treatment, TST scores were significantly correlated with BCVA (P < 0.001), letter contrast sensitivity (P < 0.001), and aniseikonia (P < 0.01). TNO scores were significantly correlated with BCVA (P < 0.01) and letter contrast sensitivity (P < 0.01). TST and TNO scores after treatment were significantly correlated with BCVA at baseline (P < 0.01 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Deterioration of stereopsis in patients with BRVO was associated with changes in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after treatment. Initial visual acuity is a prognostic factor for posttreatment stereopsis.

Aniseikonia following intravitreal ranibizumab treatment for branch retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To quantify aniseikonia following intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and assess the relationship between aniseikonia and retinal microstructure. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: This study included 50 patients undergoing IVR treatment for unilateral BRVO. The degree of aniseikonia and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was examined, and retinal microstructure was assessed with optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months after treatment. Based on OCT images, we assessed central retinal thickness (CRT), presence of the epiretinal membrane, and serous retinal detachment (SRD), as well as status of the external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone. RESULTS: At baseline, mean aniseikonia was - 1.0 ± 2.5%, ranging from - 11.0 to + 6.0%. Nine out of 50 patients had micropsia (18%), one had macropsia (2%), and 40 had no aniseikonia (80%). After 6 months of treatment, mean aniseikonia was - 0.7 ± 1.5%, ranging from - 4.5 to + 3.5%. BCVA significantly improved after treatment (P < 0.001), but aniseikonia did not change (P = 0.73). In patients with BRVO who had micropsia (≤ - 2.0%) at baseline, mean aniseikonia significantly improved from - 4.8 ± 3.3% to - 0.9 ± 1.4% (P < 0.05). Aniseikonia after treatment significantly correlated with BCVA (P < 0.05) and the presence of SRD at baseline (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Majority of eyes with aniseikonia in BRVO had micropsia. The BCVA as well as the micropsia improved following treatment with IVR for BRVO. BCVA and the presence of SRD were predictors of post-treatment aniseikonia.

Meridional aniseikonia-causes, symptoms, and therapies.

BACKGROUND: The term aniseikonia refers to the two eyes' appreciating different image sizes when viewing the same object. Meridional aniseikonia can occasionally cause significant distortion of the binocular spatial sense in perceptive patients. METHODS: The medical records of 3 adult patients who complained of binocular spatial distortion consistent with meridional aniseikonia were reviewed retrospectively. Detailed descriptions of symptoms, ocular findings, and management are reported. RESULTS: Each patient had undergone a refraction-altering surgical procedure, and each complained of binocular spatial distortion characterized by a trapezoidal view of square or rectangular shapes. Each patient improved following management of the astigmatic correction. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring a new astigmatic correction following cataract or corneal surgery may complain of binocular spatial distortion caused by meridional aniseikonia.

Measuring aniseikonia tolerance range for stereoacuity - a tool for the refractive surgeon.

OBJECTIVE: No method exists to measure aniseikonia tolerance in stereoacuity. The brain can compensate for 2%-3% aniseikonia (i.e. 2-3 dioptres of anisometropia) without impairing stereoacuity; however, a substantial proportion of anisometropic patients experience problems caused by disruptions of sensory fusion due to surgically induced aniseikonia. We hypothesized that individual differences in tolerance to aniseikonia exist and sought to develop a method to measure aniseikonia tolerance. METHODS: A total of 21 eye-healthy phakic individuals older than 50 years of age and 11 patients awaiting clear lens extraction were included. Patients were tested with best corrected near and distance visual acuity, cover/uncover test, eye dominance test, stereoacuity threshold (TNO test), slit lamp examination and ocular coherence tomography. The stereoacuity threshold was determined with aniseikonia induced by different size lenses ranging from 1% to 9% magnification of both eyes in increments of 1%. The aniseikonia tolerance range (ATR) was defined as the percentage aniseikonia in which the stereoacuity threshold was maintained. RESULTS: We examined 32 patients with a median age of 65 (95% CI: 62-66 years), CDVA better than 6/7.5 (0.1 logMAR), and median near visual acuity better than 6/6 (0.0 logMAR). The median stereoacuity threshold was 60 arcsec (maximum 30, minimum 120). We observed large inter-individual differences in ATR: 6/31 (19%) participants had an ATR of ≤1%, 1/31 (3%) had an ATR of 1-5%, 7/31 (22%) had an ATR of 5-10%, and 17/31 (54%) had an ATR of >10%. CONCLUSION: We present a reliable method for measuring the amount of aniseikonia that a person can tolerate without impairing stereopsis. We report large inter-individual differences in tolerance of aniseikonia.

Comparison of blur and magnification effects on stereopsis: overall and meridional, monocularly- and binocularly-induced.

PURPOSE: To determine whether monocularly- and binocularly-induced spherical and meridional blur and aniseikonia had similar effects on stereopsis thresholds. METHODS: Twelve participants with normal binocular vision viewed McGill modified random dot stereograms to determine stereoacuities in a four-alternative forced-choice procedure. Astigmatism was induced by placing trial lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty-three conditions were used, consisting of zero (no lens), +1 D and +2 D spheres and cylinders at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye, and the following binocular combinations of both lens powers: R × 180/L × 180, R × 45/L × 45, R × 90/L × 90, R sphere/L sphere, R × 180/L × 90, R × 45/L × 135, R × 90/L × 180. Aniseikonia was induced by placing magnifying lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty-three conditions were used, consisting of zero, 6% and 12% overall magnification and both magnifications at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye only, and the following binocular combinations using 3% and 6% lenses: R × 90/L × 90, R × 45/L × 45, R × 180/L × 180, R overall/L overall, R × 90/L × 180, R × 45/L × 135, and R × 180/L × 90. RESULTS: Stereopsis losses for binocular blur effects with parallel axes (non-anisometropic) were the same as for monocular blur effects of the same axes, and these were strongly dependent on axis (spherical blur and ×90 had the greatest effects). Binocular blur effects with orthogonal axes had greater effects than with parallel axes, with the axis combination of the former having no effect (e.g. R × 90/L × 180 was similar to R × 45/L × 135). For induced aniseikonia, splitting the magnifications between the eyes improved stereopsis slightly, and the effects were not dependent on axis. CONCLUSION: Binocular blur affects stereopsis similarly to monocular meridional blur if axes in the two eyes are parallel, whereas the effect is greater if the axes are orthogonal. In meridional aniseikonia, splitting magnification between the right and left lenses produces a small improvement in stereopsis that is independent of axis direction and right/left combination.