Characterization of CYP3A5 Selective Inhibitors for Reaction Phenotyping of Drug Candidates.

CYP3A is one of the most important classes of enzymes and is involved in the metabolism of over 70% drugs. While several selective CYP3A4 inhibitors have been identified, the search for a selective CYP3A5 inhibitor has turned out to be rather challenging. Recently, several selective CYP3A5 inhibitors have been identified through high-throughput screening of ~ 11,000 compounds and hit expansion using human recombinant enzymes. We set forth to characterize the three most selective CYP3A5 inhibitors in a more physiologically relevant system of human liver microsomes to understand if these inhibitors can be used for reaction phenotyping studies in drug discovery settings. Gomisin A and T-5 were used as selective substrate reactions for CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 to determine IC50 values of the two enzymes. The results showed that clobetasol propionate and loteprednol etabonate were potent and selective CYP3A5 reversible inhibitors with selectivity of 24-fold against CYP3A4 and 39-fold or more against the other major CYPs. The selectivity of difluprednate in HLM is much weaker than that in the recombinant enzymes due to hydrolysis of the acetate group in HLM. Based on the selectivity data, loteprednol etabonate can be utilized as an orthogonal approach, when experimental fraction metabolized of CYP3A5 is greater than 0.5, to understand CYP3A5 contribution to drug metabolism and its clinical significance. Future endeavors to identify even more selective CYP3A5 inhibitors are warranted to enable accurate determination of CYP3A5 contribution to metabolism versus CYP3A4.

Efficacy and safety of loteprednol etabonate versus fluorometholone in the treatment of patients after corneal refractive surgery: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of loteprednol etabonate (LE) 0.5% versus fluorometholone (FML) 0.1% for treating patients after corneal refractive surgery with the aim of providing an evidence-based rationale for clinical drug selection. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang, and CNKI) were searched (from inception to December 2021) for comparative clinical studies that evaluated LE versus FML treatment for post-corneal refractive surgery patients. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. The pooled risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Nine studies with a total sample size of 2677 eyes were included in this analysis. FML 0.1% and LE 0.5% produced a similar incidence of corneal haze within 6 months after surgery (P = 0.13 at 1 month, P = 0.66 at 3 months, and P = 0.12 at 6 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean logMAR postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (WMD: - 0.00; 95% CI: - 0.01 to 0.00; P = 0.29) and spherical equivalent (WMD: 0.01; 95% CI: - 0.01 to 0.03; P = 0.35). LE 0.5% appears to have a higher tendency to reduce the incidence of ocular hypertension compared FML 0.1%, but there was no statistical significance (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.50; P = 0.30). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that LE 0.5% and FML 0.1% had comparable efficacy in preventing corneal haze and corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension, with no difference in visual acuity in patients after corneal refractive surgery.

Loteprednol-Loaded Nanoformulations for Corneal Delivery by Quality-by-Design Concepts: Optimization, Characterization, and Anti-inflammatory Activity.

Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is a topical corticosteroid that uses inflammatory conditions of the eye. It has a low ocular bioavailability and side effects such as corneal disorder, eye discharge, and ocular discomfort. Therefore, it was decided to select the delivery systems, which are solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN), nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC), and nanoemulsion (NE). Design of experiments (DoE) of SLN, NLC, and NE formulations were formulated by using the quality by design (QbD) approach. Precirol® ATO 5 and oleic acid were used as solid and liquid lipids, respectively, in SLN, NLC, and NE formulations. Physiochemical characterization was performed on the formulations. The optimized formulations' inflammatory effects have been appraised on human corneal epithelial cells employing the ELISA test. Physicochemical characterization studies and inflammatory effects were appraised. The sizes of optimized formulations of SLN, NLC, and NE were 86.19 nm, 82.38 nm, and 126.35 nm, respectively, with minimum polydispersity. The release behavior of the formulations is composed of both diffusion and erosion. ELISA test results proved that the formulations significantly reduced IL-1 and IL-6 levels (p < 0.05). D-optimal mixture experimental design allowed us to develop the most precise formulations of SLN, NLC, and NE. Furthermore, the optimized formulations could be promising candidates for treating an inflammation-based corneal disease of the eye.

Optimization of High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method Using Central Composite Design for the Simultaneous Estimation of Ciprofloxacin and Loteprednol.

A simple, rapid, precise and accurate stability indicating high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was developed for simultaneous quantification of Ciprofloxacin (CIP) and Loteprednol (LOT) along with their forced degradation products using central composite design (CCD) approach. CCD was prepared with three independent variables in a gradient HPLC method. In gradient program (GP) the ratio of phosphate buffer in the mobile phase was 70%, 75%, 80%, 85% and 90%, the pH of phosphate buffer was 2.6, 2.8, 3.0, 3.2 and 3.4, flow rate was 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 mL/min. Resolution, tailing factor (CIP) and tailing factor (LOT) were selected as response factor. The effective separation of LOT and CIP was achieved on Phenomenex EVO-C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm × 5 µm particle size) opting gradient mode of elution. The mobile phase composed of 10 mM Phosphate buffer pH 3.2 with ortho-phosphoric acid and the organic phase composed of mixture of acetonitrile and methanol in 50:50% v/v with flow rate of 1 mL/min and diode array detection at 258 nm. The optimized variables found were flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, ratio of phosphate buffer in GP 80% at pH 3.0. The method was validated as per ICH guidelines and applied for analysis of stability samples.

Clinical efficacy of Fluorometholone versus Loteprednol eye drops after photorefractive keratectomy: A triple-blinded randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the anti-inflammatory efficacy and safety of 0.1% Fluorometholone (FML) versus (vs.) 0.5% Loteprednol etabonate (LE) following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: A triple-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on both eyes of 100 patients with stable refraction who were candidates for PRK. Both eyes in each subject were randomly allocated to the FML or LE groups. The product to be tested was 0.1% FML eye drops packaged in droppers vs. the 0.5% LE sterile ophthalmic suspension (Lotemax®) packaged in identical droppers. The main clinical outcomes were changes in best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) and corneal optical density. The second clinical outcomes were a change in intraocular pressure (IOP) after the intervention. RESULTS: There was no significant difference regarding mean corneal optical density changes between the two groups, one (P = 0.55) and three months (P = 0.98) after the intervention. The mean ± SD BCDVA after one month of the intervention was 0.79 ± 0.11 and 0.84 ± 0.11 in LE and FML groups, retrospectively (P = 0.02). There was no significant difference regarding mean BCDVA between the two groups three months after intervention (P = 0.21). The IOP showed no significant difference between the two groups after one (P = 0.18) and three months (P = 0.53) of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this clinical trial demonstrate that LE and FML treatment was effective with no clinically meaningful effect on IOP following a short course of treatment.

Extreme intraocular pressure and steroid-dependent iritis.

A 50-year-old ophthalmic technician was referred by her retina specialist for urgent consultation due to markedly elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) unresponsive to medical therapy. Her history included chronic polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and chronic uveitis requiring ongoing topical steroid therapy. She had a sub-Tenon injection of Kenalog (triamcinolone) 18 months prior to referral. Chronic topical anti-inflammatory therapy included nepafenac (Ilevro) and prednisolone acetate 2 times a day. Attempts to discontinue topical steroid resulted in worsening inflammation. The patient was referred when the IOP measured 44 mm Hg in the left eye despite aggressive medical therapy, including acetazolamide. The IOP improved slightly when loteprednol was substituted for prednisolone acetate. Current medications in the left eye include brimonidine 3 times a day, loteprednol 2 times a day, nepafenac 2 times a day, and fixed combination latanoprost + netarsudil at bedtime. Her only medication in the right eye was travoprost. She is intolerant to dorzolamide. She was also taking acetazolamide 500 mg 2 times a day. She was not taking any anticoagulants. Past surgical history included cataract surgery in each eye. She has not had laser trabeculoplasty in either eye. Examination revealed uncorrected visual acuity of J1+ in the right eye (near) and 20/30 in the left eye (mini-monovision). There was no afferent pupillary defect. There was mild band keratopathy in each eye while the central cornea was clear in both eyes without keratic precipitates. Here angles were open to gonioscopy without peripheral anterior synechia. There was mild to moderate flare in each eye with trace cells. The IOP was 17 mm Hg in the right eye and 31 mm Hg in the left. Central corneal thickness measured 560 µm and 559 µm in the right and left eye respectively. There was a well-positioned intraocular lens within each capsule with a patent posterior capsulotomy. There was mild vitreous syneresis but no vitreous cell. The cup to disc ratio was 0.5 in each eye with a symmetrical neural rim. The retina was flat without macular edema. Visual field was normal in both eyes (Figures 1 and 2). Optical coherence tomography of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) is shown in Figure 3 and retinal ganglion cell layer is shown in Supplemental Figure 1 (http://links.lww.com/JRS/A756).JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202301000-00020/figure1/v/2022-12-26T045736Z/r/image-tiffJOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202301000-00020/figure2/v/2022-12-26T045736Z/r/image-tiffJOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202301000-00020/figure3/v/2022-12-26T045736Z/r/image-tiff Please comment on your management of this patient's left eye.

Topical corticosteroids for dry eye.

BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED), arising from various etiologic factors, leads to tear film instability, ocular surface damage, and neurosensory changes. DED causes symptoms such as ocular dryness, burning, itching, pain, and visual impairment. Given their well-established anti-inflammatory effects, topical steroid preparations have been widely used as a short-term treatment option for DED. Because of potential risks of ocular hypertension, cataracts, and infections associated with the long-term use of topical steroids, published trials comparing the efficacy and safety of topical steroids (versus placebo) have mostly been of short duration (three to eight weeks). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of topical corticosteroids compared with no treatment, placebo, other steroidal or non-steroidal therapies, or a combination of therapies for DED. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2021, Issue 8); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), without restriction on language or year of publication. The date of the last search was 20 August 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which topical corticosteroids, alone or in combination with tobramycin, were compared with no treatment, artificial tears (AT), vehicles, AT plus tobramycin, or cyclosporine A (CsA). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We applied standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 22 RCTs conducted in the USA, Italy, Spain, China, South Korea, and India. These RCTs reported outcome data from a total of 4169 participants with DED.  Study characteristics and risk of bias All trials recruited adults aged 18 years or older, except one trial that enrolled children and adolescents aged between 3 and 14 years. Half of these trials involved predominantly female participants (median 79%, interquartile range [IQR] 76% to 80%). On average, each trial enrolled 86 participants (IQR 40 to 158). The treatment duration of topical steroids ranged between one week and three months; trial duration lasted between one week and six months. Eight trials were sponsored exclusively by industry, and four trials were co-sponsored by industry and institutional or governmental funds. We assessed the risk of bias of both subjective and objective outcomes using RoB 2, finding nearly half of the trials to be at high risk of bias associated with selective outcome reporting. Findings Of the 22 trials, 16 evaluated effects of topical steroids, alone or in combination with tobramycin, as compared with lubricants (AT, vehicle), AT plus tobramycin, or no treatment. Corticosteroids probably have a small to moderate effect on improving patient-reported symptoms by 0.29 standardized mean difference (SMD) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16 to 0.42) as compared with lubricants (moderate certainty evidence). Topical steroids also likely have a small to moderate effect on lowering corneal staining scores by 0.4 SMDs (95% CI 0.18 to 0.62) (moderate certainty evidence). However, steroids may increase tear film break-up time (TBUT) slightly (mean difference [MD] 0.70 s, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.34; low certainty evidence) but not tear osmolarity (MD 1.60 mOsm/kg, 95% CI -10.47 to 13.67; very low certainty evidence).  Six trials examined topical steroids, either alone or in combination with CsA, against CsA alone. Low certainty evidence indicates that steroid-based interventions may have a small to moderate effect on improving participants' symptoms (SMD -0.33, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.15), but little to no effect on corneal staining scores (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.35) as compared with CsA. The effect of topical steroids compared to CsA alone on TBUT (MD 0.37 s, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.87) or tear osmolarity (MD 5.80 mOsm/kg, 95% CI -0.94 to 12.54; loteprednol etabonate alone) is uncertain because the certainty of the evidence is low or very low. None of the included trials reported on quality of life scores. Adverse effects The evidence for adverse ocular effects of topical corticosteroids is very uncertain. Topical corticosteroids may increase participants' risk of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation (risk ratio [RR] 5.96, 95% CI 1.30 to 27.38) as compared with lubricants. However, when compared with CsA, steroids alone or combined with CsA may decrease or increase IOP elevation (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 8.33). It is also uncertain whether topical steroids may increase risk of cataract formation when compared with lubricants (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.22), given the short-term use and study duration (four weeks or less) to observe longer-term adverse effects.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the evidence for the specified review outcomes was of moderate to very low certainty, mostly due to high risk of bias associated with selective results reporting. For dry eye patients whose symptoms require anti-inflammatory control, topical corticosteroids probably provide small to moderate degrees of symptom relief beyond lubricants, and may provide small to moderate degrees of symptom relief beyond CsA. However, the current evidence is less certain about the effects of steroids on improved tear film quality or quantity. The available evidence is also very uncertain regarding the adverse effects of topical corticosteroids on IOP elevation or cataract formation or progression. Future trials should generate high certainty evidence to inform physicians and patients of the optimal treatment strategies with topical corticosteroids in terms of regimen (types, formulations, dosages), duration, and its time-dependent adverse profile.

Comparison of ophthalmic loteprednol etabonate and prednisolone acetate effects on adrenocortical response to ACTH in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: This study served to compare the degree of adrenocortical suppression following a 2-week administration of loteprednol etabonate (LE) and prednisolone acetate (PA) ophthalmic drops. PROCEDURES: In this prospective double-masked triple-crossover study, 21 clinically healthy dogs were randomized to receive loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5%, prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension 1%, or artificial tears (AT). Each group (LE, PA, and AT) received one drop in each eye every 12 h for 2 weeks, followed by a 3-week washout period between treatment blocks. ACTH stimulation tests were performed before and after each treatment block. Serum cortisol samples were drawn before and 60 min after administration of 1 µg/kg cosyntropin IV. Repeated-measurement ANOVA followed by a Tukey's multiple comparisons test (or a Friedman test followed by a Dunn's multiple comparisons test) were used to compare pre- and post-treatment cortisol values between each group. A p-value of ≤.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 18 dogs completed the study. Prestimulation cortisol values were lower in the PA group compared to the LE (p = .0106), but not AT (p = .0589) groups, and post-stimulation cortisol values were lower in the PA group than either LE (p = .0005) or AT (p = .0002) groups. There was no significant difference detected in pre- or post-stimulation cortisol values after the treatment periods between LE and AT. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the reduced suppression of cortisol values, LE caused significantly less hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression than PA. A topical steroid with minimal adrenocortical suppression, such as LE, may be favorable in patients where systemic glucocorticoid effects should be avoided.

Development of lipid nanoparticles for transdermal loteprednol etabonate delivery.

AIM: Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is a new generation corticosteroid that is used for the treatment of inflammatory and allergic conditions of the eye. Therefore, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) were attempted to improve transdermal LE delivery for the first time. METHODS: SLN and NLC were produced by hot homogenisation and ultrasonication technique. Their physical stability was monitored for 3 months of storage. Drug release and permeation of SLN and NLC through the porcine skin were investigated. RESULTS: It was determined that SLN and NLC mean particle size of 139.1 nm had a homogeneous particle size distribution (∼0.169 PI) and the mean charge was -23.6. They were found to be stable both physically and chemically at room temperature. CONCLUSION: SLN and NLC formulations of LE can be stated among the systems that can be an alternative to conventional systems with fewer side-effects in the treatment of inflammatory problems.

Loteprednol etabonate: a formulation for short-term use in inflammatory flares in dry eye disease.

Loteprednol etabonate is a soft corticosteroid that is rapidly deactivated after reaching the general circulation, displaying good local activity and a high therapeutic index without inducing systemic side effects. In 2021, Kala Pharmaceuticals launched Eysuvis (loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension) 0.25% in the U.S. for the short-term (up to 2 weeks) treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. Approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was based on results from one phase II trial and three phase III trials showing Eysuvis significantly improved both the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease and was well tolerated. Eysuvis is a novel loteprednol etabonate nanosuspension formulation developed by Kala using its AMPPLIFY mucus-penetrating particle (MPP) drug delivery technology. Use of this MPP formulation results in enhanced penetration of loteprednol etabonate into target tissue on the ocular surface. Eysuvis is the first FDA-approved ocular corticosteroid indicated for dry eye disease.

Fill levels, cost comparisons, and expulsion force requirements of commonly used topical ophthalmic steroids.

PURPOSE: To determine volume fill levels, estimated costs, and force expulsion requirements per bottle of topical ophthalmic steroids commonly used in the United States. SETTING: Tertiary care academic referral center. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory investigation. METHODS: 8 commercially available medications were tested: loteprednol 0.5%, loteprednol gel 0.5%, loteprednol gel 0.38%, difluprednate 0.05%, generic fluorometholone 0.1%, branded fluorometholone 0.1%, generic prednisolone 1.0%, and branded prednisolone 1.0%. 10 bottles of each medication were tested. A double-blinded method was used to measure actual bottle fill volume and number of drops dispensed per bottle. The total perioperative cost per drop was calculated for each medication using a mean cash price. Force requirements were measured using a customized force gauge apparatus. Formulations were compared using Kruskal-Wallis 1way analysis of variances. RESULTS: All formulations were able to cover postoperative periods commensurate with commonly used dosing regimens for cataract surgery. All medications had greater than sticker volume. Loteprednol 0.5% suspension and branded fluorometholone had the highest and lowest number of drops among the medications tested, respectively. Loteprednol 0.38% gel was the most expensive medication, whereas generic prednisolone 1.0% was the least expensive. Gel and branded formulations of ophthalmic steroids required less expulsion force compared with other tested formulations. CONCLUSIONS: Volume fill levels, patient-incurred costs, and expulsion force requirements per bottle of topical steroid medications vary widely. Clinicians may wish to consider these findings when determining their perioperative prescribing regimen.

Is there a role for tapered topical dose steroidal treatment for dry eye disease? A randomized, pilot study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of tapered doses of loteprednol-etabonate in dry eye disease patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dry eye and treatment outcomes were assessed by Schirmer I test, tear BUT, lissamine green conjunctival staining, fluorescein corneal staining, and HLA-DR expression on conjunctival cells. Patients received either loteprednol-etabonate 0.5% twice daily for 14 days tapered to once daily for 14 days, and then twice weekly for 28 days (n = 10), or NaCl 0.9%. RESULTS: A significant decrease of ocular surface inflammation and improvement of symptoms was recorded in the study group compared with controls at days 14 and 56. Change from baseline in HLA-DR expression in CD45+ conjunctival cells was significantly higher in treated patients at day 14. Intraocular pressure and best corrected visual acuity were preserved in all treated eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Tapered doses of loteprednol etabonate 0.5% suspension controlled ocular surface inflammation, improving dry eye symptoms.

The effect of loteprednol suspension eye drops after corneal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: To compare the effect of loteprednol suspension eye drops after corneal transplantation with the effect of prednisolone acetate eye drops. METHODS: A total of 234 patients (234 eyes) who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and lamellar keratoplasty (LKP) were retrospectively included. Patients who received 1 % prednisolone acetate eye drops were defined as 1 % prednisolone acetate eye drop group (n = 96), and patients who received 0.5 % loteprednol suspension eye drops were defined as 0.5 % loteprednol suspension eye drop group (n = 138). RESULTS: 35 cases in 1 % prednisolone acetate eye drops group and 27 cases in 0.5 % loteprednol suspension eye drops group developed corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension, and were defined as prednisolone acetate group and loteprednol group. No significant differences were observed in the average intraocular pressure (IOP) at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months or 12 months postoperatively. There were significant differences in the average IOP between the two groups at 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the average best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1, 3 and 12 months postoperatively between two groups. The average 6-month postoperative BCVA was significantly higher in the prednisolone acetate group than the loteprednol group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the postoperative graft rejection rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 0.5 % loteprednol suspension eye drops may be considered for long-term use after corneal transplantation.

Cytarabine-Induced Corneal Toxicity: Clinical Features and Relief of Symptoms with Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% in Two Patients

We report two patients who developed toxic keratopathy following high-dose cytarabine chemotherapy and whose symptoms resolved following topical loteprednol etabonate 0.5% treatment. A 25-year-old woman and a 26-year-old man with acute myeloid leukemia were referred to our department with symptoms of ocular discomfort, photophobia, and blurred vision after consolidation chemotherapy. Central corneal epithelial microcysts were observed bilaterally in both patients, and in vivo confocal microscopy showed highly reflective disseminated granular and irregular intraepithelial opacities, mainly in the basal epithelial layers. Loteprednol etabonate 0.5% relieved both patients' symptoms in less than a week, and the microcysts disappeared in 2 to 3 weeks of treatment. Although there is no standardized treatment protocol for cytarabine-induced corneal toxicity, dexamethasone 0.1% and prednisolone phosphate 1.0% were reported to be effective in the resolution of discomfort and symptoms. In the two patients we report herein, loteprednol etabonate 0.5% four times daily was also effective in suppressing the symptoms.

Safety of KPI-121 Ophthalmic Suspension 0.25% in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Multicenter, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Studies.

PURPOSE: The safety of KPI-121 0.25%, an ophthalmic nanoparticle suspension of loteprednol etabonate, was evaluated in subjects with dry eye disease (DED) in one phase 2 and three phase 3 randomized trials of similar design. METHODS: Adults with DED received KPI-121 0.25% or vehicle drops 4 times daily (QID) for ≥2 weeks; 1430 subjects received KPI-121 0.25% and 1438 subjects received vehicle drops. Main safety assessments were adverse events (AEs) and intraocular pressure (IOP). As a common side effect associated with the use of ocular corticosteroids is elevated IOP, subjects with a history of or current diagnosis of glaucoma were excluded. RESULTS: Instillation site pain was the most common AE, reported by 5.2% of subjects in the KPI-121 0.25% group and 4.4% of subjects in the vehicle group; other AEs were reported by ≤0.8% of subjects in the KPI-121 group. IOP elevations, a side effect associated with the use of ophthalmic corticosteroids, were observed with low incidence: 0.6% and 0.2% of subjects in the KPI-121 and vehicle groups, respectively. An IOP elevation was defined as an increase from baseline of >5 mm Hg that resulted in an IOP of ≥21 mm Hg in either eye during use of the study product. CONCLUSIONS: KPI-121 ophthalmic suspension 0.25% seemed to be safe and well tolerated when dosed QID for 2 to 4 weeks in those DED subjects included in the 4 trials.

Loteprednol Etabonate for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease.

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular condition that can impair vision and may adversely impact quality of life. Due to the inflammatory nature of this disorder, topical corticosteroids are an effective treatment option, particularly for moderate-to-severe DED when first-line treatments, such as ocular lubricants, are insufficient. Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is a retrometabolically designed corticosteroid with a low propensity to cause corticosteroid-related adverse effects, such as elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). This review was conducted to provide an assessment of published studies on the use of LE for treatment of inflammation associated with DED. Twelve prospective and 2 retrospective studies evaluating LE ophthalmic suspension 0.5% and 2 prospective studies evaluating LE ophthalmic gel 0.5% were identified. LE given as monotherapy or with artificial tears (AT) improved signs of DED, especially among patients with a more pronounced inflammatory component, and also improved DED symptoms compared to baseline and/or control. Treatment with LE before cyclosporine A (CsA) therapy reduced stinging upon CsA initiation and provided more rapid relief of DED signs and symptoms than CsA plus AT alone. In patients with meibomian gland dysfunction, LE alone, or in addition to eyelid scrubs/warm compresses, reduced clinical signs and symptoms, and tear proinflammatory cytokine levels. Overall, LE was safe and well tolerated, with minimal effects on IOP. While larger and longer-term studies are warranted, these data support the use of LE as a safe and effective treatment option for DED.