Intensive urate-lowering with pegloticase plus methotrexate co-therapy in uncontrolled gout patients with and without chronic kidney disease: A retrospective case series.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and gout commonly co-occur. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU) in uncontrolled gout patients but antidrug antibodies limit urate-lowering response and increase infusion reaction (IR) risk. Methotrexate (MTX) co-administration increases pegloticase response rate and mitigates IR risk but CKD limits MTX use. This pooled case series examined pegloticase + MTX co-therapy in uncontrolled gout patients with and without CKD. Cases of pegloticase + MTX co-therapy in existing datasets were retrospectively examined. Baseline eGFR classified patients as CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) or non-CKD (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Patient characteristics, treatment parameters, laboratory values, urate-lowering response rate (≥12 pegloticase infusions received and SU < 6 mg/dL just before infusion 12), and AEs were examined. Fifteen CKD (eGFR: 43.2 ±â€…11.3 mL/min/1.73 m2; SU: 8.6 ±â€…2.2 mg/dL), 27 non-CKD (eGFR: 82.9 ±â€…19.0 mL/min/1.73 m2; SU: 9.5 ±â€…1.7 mg/dL) patients were included. Comorbidity profiles were similar, but CKD patients were older (72.0 ±â€…9.9 vs 52.3 ±â€…14.3 years) and more often female (33.3% vs 7.4%). Treatment parameters were similar with 4-week MTX Run-in followed by mean of 14.7 ±â€…8.1 [CKD] vs 14.1 ±â€…7.1 [non-CKD] pegloticase infusions. However, CKD patients had lower MTX dose (14.8 ±â€…5.8 vs 19.3 ±â€…4.9 mg/week). Urate-lowering response was similar (92% vs 86%). eGFR increased during treatment in 60% of CKD (+11.5 ±â€…20.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, 87% stable/improved CKD-stage) and 44% of non-CKD (+4.2 ±â€…15.0 mL/min/1.73 m2) patients. AEs were similar (≥1 AE CKD: 53%, non-CKD: 67%; gout flare most-reported). One case each of pancytopenia and IR (mild) occurred in non-CKD patients. These real-world data show similar pegloticase + MTX efficacy in CKD and non-CKD patients. No new safety signals were identified, with most CKD patients showing renal function stability or improvement during therapy.

Cardiovascular safety of febuxostat versus allopurinol among the Asian patients with or without gout: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The cardiovascular (CV) safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for the treatment of hyperuricemia among Asian patients is uncertain. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the CV safety profiles of febuxostat with allopurinol in Asian patients with hyperuricemia. A total of 13 studies were included. On the basis of the pooled results of cohort studies, febuxostat users were at a significantly higher risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.09, p < 0.01), atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.35, p < 0.01) than allopurinol users, whereas no significant difference between febuxostat and allopurinol existed for urgent coronary revascularization (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98-1.16, p = 0.13), and stroke (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.91-1.01, p = 0.13). Nevertheless, that difference in results of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF; HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.35-1.53, p = 0.40) and all-cause death (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.49-1.51, p = 0.60) was not significant based on randomized controlled trials. In the Chinese subgroup, febuxostat could increase the risk of ADHF (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.48, p < 0.05), CV death (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03-1.50, p < 0.05), and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p < 0.05) compared to allopurinol. In conclusion, the use of febuxostat, compared with allopurinol among Asian patients, was associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse CV events.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of benzbromarone and febuxostat in gout and hyperuricemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Urate-lowering therapy (ULT) is widely recognized as the primary treatment for hyperuricemia and gout. Xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOI), particularly febuxostat, have gained popularity as a frontline approach. However, the divergent efficacy and safety between febuxostat and the traditional ULT drug, benzbromarone, remain poorly understood. This knowledge gap necessitates a comprehensive analysis and evidence update to guide drug selection for physicians and patients. METHOD: We conducted a systematic analysis by extracting relevant clinical studies from four medical literature databases. Forest plots, funnel plots, sensitivity analysis, Egger's test, and subgroup analysis were utilized to compare relevant indicators. RESULTS: The advantages and disadvantages of the two drugs were evaluated based on various indicators such as serum uric acid (SUA), triglyceride (TG), urinary uric acid (UUA), white blood cell count (WBC), total cholesterol (TC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and serum creatinine (SC). Benzbromarone demonstrated better efficacy in rapidly reducing SUA levels and inhibiting inflammation for hyperuricemia and gout patients. Febuxostat was slightly less effective in lowering SUA, but there was no significant difference in its impact on liver and kidney function after long-term use. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the superiority of benzbromarone in rapidly reducing SUA and inhibiting inflammation. Febuxostat shows comparable effects on liver and kidney function after long-term use. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians and patients in drug selection. Key Points • Benzbromarone stands out as a highly effective treatment for hyperuricemia and gout, offering rapid reduction of serum uric acid levels and potent anti-inflammatory effects. • When it comes to long-term use, febuxostat demonstrates comparable effects on liver and kidney function. This provides reassurance for patients who require extended treatment duration. • Moreover, our study goes beyond previous research by presenting a more comprehensive and detailed analysis.

Prescribing cascades of antigout medications from thiazide diuretics in gout-naïve hypertensive adults receiving first-line pharmacological management.

Prescribing cascade is a significant clinical problem but is often overlooked. We explore the incidence of the prescribing cascades of antigout medications related to thiazide treatment in gout-naïve hypertensive adults newly exposed to the pharmacological treatment. This population-based, retrospective cohort study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Registry Database. Gout-naïve hypertensive adults who were newly dispensed first-line antihypertensive drugs between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016, were enrolled. Patients were divided into the thiazide group (n = 4192) and the non-thiazide group (n = 81,083). The non-thiazide group included patients who received an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor blocker, calcium channel blocker, or beta-blocker. The study utilized propensity score matching and multivariable Cox regression models to investigate the prescribing cascade of antigout agents following antihypertensive treatment, adjusting for factors like age, sex, comorbidities, and concurrent medications. After propensity score matching, each group consisted of 4045 patients, with the thiazide group exhibiting a higher risk of being prescribed antigout medications across different time intervals post-treatment initiation. Specifically, adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for the thiazide group were 2.23, 2.07, and 2.41 for < 30 days, 31-180 days, and > 180 days, respectively, indicating a sustained and significant risk over time. Comparative analyses revealed thiazide diuretics were associated with a higher risk of antigout medication prescriptions compared to other antihypertensive classes, particularly evident after 180 days. Subgroup analyses across various demographics and comorbidities consistently showed an increased risk in the thiazide cohort. Gout-naïve hypertensive adults newly dispensed thiazide had a higher risk of subsequently adding antigout agents than those taking other first-line antihypertensive medications. The awareness and interruption of these prescribing cascades are critical to improving patient safety.

How common are side effects of treatment to prevent gout flares when starting allopurinol?

The studyRoddy E, Bajpai R, Forrester H, et al. Safety of colchicine and NSAID prophylaxis when initiating urate-lowering therapy for gout: propensity score-matched cohort studies in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:1618-25.To read the full NIHR Alert, go to: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/alert/how-common-are-side-effects-of-treatment-to-prevent-gout-flares-when-starting-allopurinol/.

The Effects of Pharmacological Urate-Lowering Therapy on Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults with Gout.

Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of mortality in older patients. In addition to the traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, hyperuricemia has been increasingly associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease. Uric acid itself has several unfavorable effects on the cardiovascular system, and hyperuricemia can lead to the development of gout. Gout is the most prevalent inflammatory rheumatic disease. Older patients with gout have an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality due to an increased prevalence of traditional risk factors, as well as the inflammatory burden of gout activity. As the prevalence of traditional risk factors and the prevalence of both hyperuricemia and gout are increasing in older adults, cardiovascular risk management in these patients is very important. This risk management consists of, on the one hand, treatment of individual traditional risk factors and, on the other hand, of urate lowering, thereby decreasing inflammatory burden of gout. However, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that urate-lowering therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular events. Moreover, from a cardiovascular point of view, there is no preference for one urate lowering drug over another in patients with gout, nor is there enough evidence to support a preference in patients with gout with increased cardiovascular risk. Personalized treatment in older patients with gout should be aimed at optimizing serum uric acid levels, as well as targeting traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to support the hypothesis that urate lowering reduces cardiovascular risk in older patients with gout.

Clinical characteristics of adolescent-onset gout in Chinese: A hospital-based cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Adolescent-onset gout has a greater impact on the lives and health of patients than adult-onset gout. However, there is a relative lack of clinical information on adolescent-onset gout. Hence, we analyzed a Chinese cohort. METHODS: We studied clinical features of 9,003 Chinese patients. Gout onset age of 12 - 19 years is defined as adolescent-onset group (AG), 20 - 40 years as early-onset group (EG), and 41 - 64 years as late-onset group (LG). Multivariable regression analysis evaluated factors associated with recurrent flares, serum urate (SU) levels, and underexcretion type in AG. RESULTS: Compared with EG and LG, the AG had higher SU levels [AG: 9.5 (2.2) mg/dL, EG: 8.6 (2.1) mg/dL, LG: 7.73 (2.0) mg/dL, P < 0.001], higher percentage of positive family history of gout (AG: 41.8 %, EG: 29.6 %, LG: 24.6 %, P < 0.001), underexcretion type (AG: 62.4 %, EG: 62.5 %, LG: 58.8 %, P = 0.04), recurrent flares (AG: 78.1 %, EG: 70.3 %, LG: 68.9 %, P = 0.01). Urate-lowering therapy (ULT) initiated [OR 6.58 (95 % CI 1.35 - 32.00)] and hypercholesterolemia [OR 4.16 (95 % CI 1.28 - 13.53)] were associated with recurrent flares. eGFR was identified to be a significant variable of increasing SU levels [beta -0.24 (95 % CI -0.04 to -0.01)]. Hypertriglyceridemia [OR 0.35 (95 % CI 0.17 - 0.71)] was related to underexcretion type. CONCLUSION: Adolescent-onset gout patients had clinically distinctive features with higher SU levels, BMI, positive gout family history, underexcretion type and recurrent flares. These specific populations were less likely to achieve ULT target, requiring more clinical attention.

Gout: one year in review 2023.

Gout is a chronic joint disease caused by the deposition of monosodium urate crystals into and around the articular tissues. In the last two years, new insights regarding diagnosis, genetic involvement, pathogenesis, comorbidities, and clinical data, have allowed the identification of new strategies to improve the control of the disease and its flares. In keeping, the discover of new mechanisms concerning crystal-induced inflammation have suggested new ways for the management not only of gout, but also other systemic diseases, mainly including renal and cardiovascular disorders. In this context it is very representative the case of colchicine which, given the surprising results obtained both in laboratory and clinical experiments, has recently received by FDA the approval for the prevention of cardiovascular disorders.

Trends in healthcare utilization by patients with gout: A cross-sectional study using Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service data.

This study aimed to analyze the distribution of gout patients and the utilization of healthcare services in South Korea to provide valuable recommendations to clinicians and policymakers. A cross-sectional study was conducted. Claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service spanning 2010 to 2019 were utilized, and a sample of 69,680 patients was included in the study. The incidence of gout was observed to be high in male patients over the age of 40, with most patients receiving outpatient care for gout management. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and urate-lowering agents were the most frequently prescribed medications, with prescriptions for colchicine and febuxostat increasing among urate-lowering agents. Musculoskeletal disorders were found to be the most common comorbidities among gout patients. Although the total costs of gout management increased, there was no significant increase in cost per patient. This study provides insights into the current state of healthcare utilization for gout patients in South Korea and trends in the disease burden and use of medications. The findings have crucial implications for clinicians and policymakers involved in decision-making regarding the management and treatment of gout.

Association between patient adherence and treat-to-target in gout: A cross-sectional study.

The implementation of a treat-to-target (T2T) approach has been widely recommended for achieving optimal outcomes in gout treatment, as substantiated by a wealth of compelling evidence. However, a paucity of knowledge exists regarding the barriers hindering effective T2T management in China. This study seeks to investigate the factors contributing to treatment failure within the context of the T2T strategy. A cross-sectional, multi-center investigation was conducted, involving the completion of electronic questionnaires by outpatients undergoing urate-lowering treatment for a duration exceeding 6 months. These questionnaires encompassed demographic information, disease-related conditions, comorbid conditions, and management. The study analyzed factors associated with serum uric acid levels exceeding 360 µmol/L, poor disease control, and poor medication adherence. A total of 425 valid questionnaires were collected, representing 90.8% of the patients. The T2T implementation rate was 26.82% (n = 114). Factors linked to serum uric acid levels surpassing 360 µmol/L included moderate medication adherence (odds ratio (OR) = 2.35; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-4.77; P = .016), poor medication adherence (OR = 4.63; 95% CI 2.28-9.51; P < .001), and management by general practitioners (OR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.37-0.97; P = .036). The rate of well-controlled patients was 14.35% (n = 61). Predictors of not well controlled encompassed the presence of tophi (OR = 2.48; 95% CI 1.17-5.61; P = .023), general medication adherence (OR = 2.78; 95% CI 1.28-6.05; P = .009), poor medication adherence (OR = 6.23; 95% CI 2.68-14.77; P < .001), and poor patient's perception of gout (OR = 4.07; 95% CI 1.41-13.91; P = .015). A poor medication adherence rate of 55.29% (n = 235) was observed, with lower rates of poor medication adherence associated with the use of febuxostat (OR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.83; P = .02), uric acid levels exceeding 360 µmol/L (OR = 3.05; 95% CI 1.84-5.12; P = .00), moderate patient education (OR = 2.28; 95% CI 1.29-4.15; P = .01), moderate diet control (OR = 1.98; 95% CI 1.17-3.41; P = .01), and poor diet control (OR = 3.73; 95% CI 1.26-12.83; P = .02). The rate of T2T implementation in China is notably low among patients undergoing urate-lowering treatment of gout beyond 6 months. Importantly, medication adherence demonstrates a significant association with T2T outcomes.

Effects of uric acid-lowering therapy (ULT) on renal outcomes in CKD patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that asymptomatic hyperuricemia and gout play an important role in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the effect of uric acid-lowering therapy (ULT) on the prognosis of CKD patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia remains controversial. Therefore, we aim to investigate the influence of ULT on renal outcomes in these patients. METHODS: Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), and the Cochrane Library, up until January 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of ULT on renal outcomes in CKD patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo or no treatment, ULT preserved the loss of estimated glomerular filtrating rate (eGFR) (Weighted mean difference [WMD] and its 95% confidence intercal(CI): 2.07 [0.15,3.98] mL/min/1.73m2) at long-term subgroup. At the same time, short-term subgroup also proved the preserved loss of eGFR (WMD 5.74[2.09, 9.39] mL/min/1.73m2). Compared with placebo or no treatment, ULT also reduced the increase in serum creatinine (Scr) at short-term (WMD -44.48[-84.03,-4.92]µmol/L) subgroup and long-term (WMD -46.13[-65.64,-26.62]µmol/L) subgroup. ULT was associated with lower incidence of the events of doubling of Scr without dialysis (relative risk (RR) 0.32 [0.21, 0.49], p < 0.001). However, no difference was found for lower incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) (p = 0.943). CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, ULT is beneficial for slowing CKD progression both in short to long-term follow-ups. Additionally, in patients younger than 60 years old, the protective effect of ULT on renal outcome is more pronounced. However, it showed no significant difference in the incidence of AKI. These findings underscore the importance of considering ULT in clinical strategies for CKD patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia.

Intestinal toxicity alleviation and efficacy potentiation through therapeutic administration of Lactobacillus paracasei GY-1 in the treatment of gout flares with colchicine.

Gout flares have emerged as a significant public health concern. Colchicine (COL) is a first-line and standard drug for treating gout flares. However, its clinical use is limited due to various adverse effects. Besides, COL fails to adequately meet the needs of patients, particularly young patients. In this study, we investigate the therapeutic administration of Lactobacillus paracasei GY-1 (GY-1) to overcome the limitations of COL. Our results demonstrate that GY-1 attenuates COL toxicity in terms of body weight loss, decreased feed intake, mortality, reduced locomotor activity, colon shortening, increased oxidative stress, histological damage, and impaired gut permeability. Meanwhile, we demonstrate that GY-1 enhances the therapeutic effect for gout flares when combined with COL, as evidenced by the reduction in paw swelling, decreased levels of proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1ß and TNF-α, and an increase in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. Additionally, the absolute quantification of the gut microbiota shows that GY-1 restores the gut microbiota imbalance caused by COL. Furthermore, GY-1 reduces the abundance of 4 Alistipes species and 6 Porphyromonadaceae species, which may be responsible for toxicity alleviation. At the same time, GY-1 increases the abundance of Bacteroides sartorii and Enterococcus sp., which may contribute to its therapeutic efficacy. This study demonstrates the feasibility of developing probiotic-based adjuvant therapy or bacteriotherapy for treating gout flares. To our knowledge, GY-1 is the first probiotic that could be used as an alternative synergetic agent with COL for the therapeutic treatment of gout flares.

Comparison of clinical and economic evaluation between selected generic and original febuxostat tablets in Chinese gout patients with hyperuricemia: A real-world multicenter retrospective study.

Generic febuxostat tablets were listed in China's third-round centralized drug procurement program. However, there are no sufficient data available on the use of febuxostat in a real-world setting. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of selected generic febuxostat with original febuxostat in primary gout and hyperuricemia. Medical records at 3 tertiary hospitals from January 2014 to February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the distribution of baseline characteristics. The proportion of patients achieving target serum uric acid (SUA) levels at 12 weeks, the percent changes from baseline in SUA, adverse drug reactions, and the cost of febuxostat therapy were assessed. A total of 221 patients were recruited and 57 pairs of patients were 1:1 matched in the 2 groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving a target SUA levels below 300 µmol/L, the percent changes of SUA decreased from baseline, and the incidence of adverse drug reactions between the 2 groups (all P > .05). The daily febuxostat cost in the generic group were significantly lower than that in original group (P < .05). Based on the results of this study, the clinical efficacy of selected generic febuxostat is comparable to that of original febuxostat for gout with hyperuricemia. No serious adverse reactions were reported in the 2 groups, and generic febuxostat is more economical than the original febuxostat.

An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on the effects of urate-lowering therapy initiation during a gout flare.

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the optimal time to start urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in the setting of a gout flare. The aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of ULT initiation during a gout flare. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA methodology. MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between database inception to 1 March 2023. RCTs published in English that examined ULT initiation during a gout flare in adults ≥18 years were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Data were extracted for the following outcomes: patient-rated pain score, duration of gout flare, recurrent gout flares, time to achieve target serum urate, adherence to ULT, patient satisfaction with treatment and adverse events. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager v5.4. This study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42023404680. RESULTS: A total of 972 studies were identified and of these, six RCTs met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Three studies were assessed as having high risk of bias, one study as having some concerns, and two studies as having low risk of bias. In total, there were 445 pooled participants; 226 participants randomised to early initiation of ULT and 219 to placebo or delayed initiation of ULT. Allopurinol was used in three studies, febuxostat in two studies and probenecid in one study. Few participants (n = 62, 13.9 %) had tophaceous gout. Participants with renal impairment were excluded from most studies. There were no differences in patient-rated pain scores at baseline, days 3-4, days 7-8, day 10 or days 14-15 (p ≥ 0.42). Additionally, there was no significant difference in time to resolution of gout flare (standardised mean difference 0.77 days; 95 % CI -0.26 to 1.79; p = 0.14) or the risk of recurrent gout flare in the subsequent 28 to 30 days (RR 1.06; 95 % CI 0.59 to 1.92; p = 0.84). Adverse events were similar between groups. The included studies did not report time to achieve target serum urate, long-term adherence to ULT, or patient satisfaction with treatment. CONCLUSION: There appears to be no evidence for harm or for benefit to initiating ULT during a gout flare. These findings have limited applicability to patients with tophaceous gout, or those with renal impairment.

Moving urate-lowering therapy in gout beyond guideline recommendations.

The 'treat-to target serum urate strategy' when using urate-lowering therapy has been recommended by most specialist rheumatology societies for many years. An alternative "treat-to-avoid-symptoms" in gout has been suggested, albeit without a clear definition of what this means and how it might be implemented in clinical trials or clinical practice. This has hampered efforts to design clinical trials that compare the "treat-to-target [urate]" and "treat-to-avoid-symptoms" strategies in the long-term management of gout. In this review we consider the rationale for the treat-to-target urate strategy when using urate-lowering therapy, potential definitions of a "treat-to-avoid-symptoms" strategy, or perhaps what is not "treat-to-avoid-symptoms", and approaches that might address this uncertainty.

The Development of Gout Treat-To-Target booklet.

INTRODUCTION: The treat-to-target serum uric acid approach is recommended in local and international guidelines on gout management. Instruction for initiation and dose escalation for urate lowering therapy may cause confusion to the patient. Our aim was to develop and validate Gout Treat-To- Target booklet to aid in patient education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A content development team which consisted of three consultant rheumatologists developed the booklet. Content validation was performed by a panel of evaluators consisted of eleven physicians (four consultant rheumatologists, two clinical specialists, and five medical officers), who were involved in gout management. Face validation was performed by ten patients with gout. RESULTS: Item-Content Validity Index ranged from 0.9 to 1 with regards to relevancy, clarity, ambiguity and simplicity. Side effects of uricosuric agents were added to the draft based on an evaluator's comment. Item-Face Validity Index was 1, which indicated that all patients were in 100% agreement with all items. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated our Gout Treat-to- Target booklet. There was high agreement in I-FVI and I-CVI among physicians and patients.