Combined Rotational excimer lASER coronary atherectomy (RASER) in non-crossable, non-dilatable coronary artery disease: observations from a single center.

BACKGROUND: Balloon non-crossable stenoses represent a challenging subset of coronary artery disease (CAD). They are clinically associated with patients who are older, frailer, and with multi-morbidities, and angiographically with increased tortuosity and coronary artery calcification. Combined rotational (RA) excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA), or RASER, may facilitate stent delivery and deployment in non-crossable, non-dilatable severely calcified lesions. In this study, we assessed preliminary safety and efficacy of the RASER hybrid technique. METHODS: RASER feasible percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures performed at a large tertiary hospital in the northeast of England were retrospectively analyzed from September 1, 2008, to February 28, 2022. Major endpoints were in-hospital death from any cause, as well as procedural and angiographic success, defined by stent delivery with less than 50% residual stenosis and without clinical or angiographic complications, respectively. RESULTS: From 74 unique cases, there were 28 RASER, 24 ELCA/RA, 16 balloon angioplasty ± stenting, and 6 medically treated patients. In-hospital mortality rate was 5.2%, including 1 ELCA- and 3 RASER-treated patients. Successful stent delivery was achieved in significantly more RASER-treated patients compared to ELCA/RA- or balloon-treated patients: 96.4% (27/28), 25% (6/24), and 31.3% (5/16) respectively (P less than .001). CONCLUSIONS: In our retrospective, single-center study, patients with CAD who were deemed appropriate for RASER PCI had a high peri-procedural mortality rate. In this context, adjunctive RASER therapy provides acceptable safety and efficacy as a bailout strategy, with at least 3 out of 5 patients achieving satisfactory procedural and angiographic results. Randomized controlled trials are needed to comprehensively compare the clinical outcomes of high-risk RASER PCI vs conservative medical therapy.

Comparison of mid-outcome among bare metal stent, atherectomy with or without drug-coated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal arterial occlusion.

This study evaluated the outcomes of a bare metal stent (BMS), DCB alone, atherectomy plus a drug-coated balloon (AT + DCB) and AT alone for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery occlusion. Four groups were included in this retrospective cohort study: 119 patients underwent the BMS procedure, 89 patients underwent DCB alone, 52 patients underwent AT + DCB, and 61 patients underwent AT alone. Patients were followed-up at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months after the procedure, the clinical outcomes and complications were assessed, and the primary outcomes were primary patency and restenosis. AT + DCB showed a lower bailout stent, and BMS displayed a higher retrograde puncture, flow-limiting dissection and postdilation (p < 0.05). For all procedures, the walking distance, ABI and pain score post-procedure were significantly improved compared with the pre-procedure values (p < 0.001). The restenosis rate was higher in BMS (21.0%) and AT alone (24.6%) than in DCB (10.1%) alone and AT + DCB (11.5%) (p = 0.04); there was no difference in amputation or clinically driven target lesion revascularization among procedures. The primary patency rates were 77.7%, 89.4%, 88.0% and 73.7% in the BMS, DCB alone, AT + DCB and AT alone groups at 24 months, respectively (p = 0.03), while the secondary patency and main adverse events (stroke, MI and death) were similar. Proximal concavity, proximal target vessel diameter ≥ 5 mm, runoff number ≥ 2 and DCB use were protective factors for primary patency. Our results suggested that AT + DCB and DCB alone were associated with higher primary patency, and DCB devices (combined with/without AT) should be the preferred choice for FP lesions.

Safety and Efficacy of Excimer Laser Atherectomy Combined with a Drug-Coated Balloon in De Novo Femoral Popliteal Artery Disease: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) for de novo femoropopliteal artery disease (FPAD) is currently unknown. This case series evaluated the clinical outcomes of ELA combined with DCB in de novo FPAD from a real-world clinical perspective. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients treated with ELA + DCB for de novo FPAD between November 2016 and January 2020. The primary efficacy endpoint was the initial patency rate; secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization without clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and technical success. Primary safety endpoints included all-cause death, unplanned major amputation, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 37.8 ± 25.3 months and included 56 consecutive patients (68.23 ± 8.01 years, 41 men). Forty-three patients had lifestyle-restricted claudication, and 13 patients had critical limb-threatening ischemia. The mean length of the lesion was 178.41 mm in all patients. The total lesion occlusion rate was 48.2 (n = 27), and the overall technical success rate was 100%. The 12-month, 24-month, 36-month, and 48-month primary patency rates of the ELA + DCB group were 75%, 66.1%, 58.9%, and 42.8%, respectively. Freedom from CD-TLR at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months was 83.9%, 80.3%, 76.8%, and 57.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world clinical practice, ELA + DCB appears to be a safe and effective endovascular treatment for de novo FPAD, with a low rate of freedom from CD-TLR and a good patency rate.

Effects of atherectomy on major adverse limb events for femoropopliteal interventions: Vascular Quality Initiative registry.

BACKGROUND: Atherectomy use in treatment of femoropopliteal disease has significantly increased despite scant evidence of benefit to long-term clinical outcomes. AIMS: We investigated the clinical benefits of atherectomy over standard treatment for femoropopliteal interventions. METHODS: Using data from the Society of Vascular Surgery's Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry, we identified patients who underwent isolated femoropopliteal interventions for occlusive disease. We compared 13,423 patients treated with atherectomy with 47,371 receiving standard treatment; both groups were allowed definitive treatment with a drug-coated balloon or stenting. The primary endpoint was major adverse limb events (MALEs), which is a composite of target vessel re-occlusion, ipsilateral major amputation, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: Mean age was 69 ± 11 years, and patients were followed for a median of 30 months. Overall rates of complications were slightly higher in the atherectomy group than the standard treatment group (6.2% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, after adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, atherectomy use was associated with a 13% reduction in risk of MALEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.98). Rates of major and minor amputations were significantly lower in the atherectomy group (3.2% vs. 4.6% and 3.3% vs. 4.3%, respectively, both p < 0.001), primarily driven by a significantly decreased risk of major amputations (aOR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.91). There were no differences in 30-day mortality, primary patency, and target vessel revascularization between the atherectomy and standard treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In adults undergoing femoropopliteal interventions, the use of atherectomy was associated with a reduction in MALEs compared with standard treatment.

Tissue responses to everolimus-eluting stents implanted in severely calcified lesions following atherectomy.

Histopathological examination has revealed that stents on severely calcified plaques were associated with delayed vascular healing. Although atherectomy devices can increase the number of malapposed struts, tissue responses to implanted drug eluting stents in atherectomy patients remain largely unknown. This retrospective observational study included 30 patients who underwent atherectomy and everolimus-eluting stent (EES) deployment for severely calcified coronary lesions (biodegradable polymer EES (BP-EES), n = 15; durable polymer EES (DP-EES), n = 15). Optical coherence tomography was carried out at baseline and follow-up, and struts with acute stent malapposition (ASM) were categorized as struts on modified calcium (mod-Ca), non-modified calcium (non-mod-Ca), or non-calcium (non-Ca). Adequate vascular healing, defined as ASM resolution with neointimal coverage, was compared between the BP-EES and DP-EES groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis using a generalized estimated equation revealed that BP-EES use was associated with significantly better adequate vascular healing compared with DP-EES (odds ratio [OR]: 3.691, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.175-11.592, P = 0.025). adequate vascular healing was associated with the underlying plaque morphology (mod-Ca vs non-mod-Ca: OR 2.833, 95% CI 1.491-5.384, P = 0.001; non-Ca vs non-mod-Ca: OR 1.248, 95% CI 0.440-3.543, P = 0.677). This study demonstrates that drug-eluting stent selection and calcium modification are possible factors affecting vascular healing of malapposed struts in severely calcified lesions.

Orbital atherectomy safety and efficacy: A comparative analysis of ostial versus non-ostial calcified coronary lesions.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of coronary orbital atherectomy (OA) for treatment of ostial lesions are not yet fully established. We sought to evaluate (OA) treatment of severely calcified ostial and non-ostial lesions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of subjects treated with OA for severely calcified ostial and non-ostial lesions, at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida (MSMCMB) from January 2014 to September 2020, was completed. Study baseline characteristics, lesion and vessel characteristics, procedural outcomes, and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: A total of 609 patients that underwent PCI with OA were identified. The majority of patients (81.9 %) had non-ostial lesions, while 16.6 % had ostial lesions (of which 2.8 % classified as aorto-ostial) and 1.5 % had unknown lesion anatomy. The mean age of the overall cohort was 74.0 ± 9.3 years, and 63.5 % were male. All patients received drug-eluting stent (DES) placement, and the overall freedom from MACE was 98.5 %, with no significant difference observed between the ostial and non-ostial groups. The freedom from cardiac death and MI was also similar between the two groups. There were low rates of bleeding complications and severe angiographic complications, and no persistent slow flow/no reflow was reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated no significant differences in in-hospital MACE outcomes between patients with ostial versus non-ostial lesions, indicating that OA is a safe and effective treatment option for both lesion types, including those classified as aorto-ostial.

Difference between antegrade and retrograde orbital atherectomy system debulking using an artificial pulsatile heart model.

BACKGROUND: Debulking devices are necessary to treat severe calcified lesions. OAS has a unique characteristic that the burr moves forward and backward. There are few studies reporting the differences of ablation style between only-antegrade and only-retrograde OAS. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference of ablation style between only-antegrade and only-retrograde orbital atherectomy system (OAS) using an artificial pulsatile heart model (HEARTROID system®) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: The calcified lesion model was inserted into the mid of left anterior descending in the HEARTROID®. Only-antegrade and only-retrograde ablation of OAS were conducted for each five lesions. Pre-OCT, OCT after low speed debulking and OCT after high speed debulking were conducted. The width and the depth of debulked area, the debulked area and the direction of debulked area were investigated. RESULTS: In all of 210 cross-sections, 91 debulked cross sections were chosen for analysis. Only-antegrade group had 47 debulked cross-sections, and only-retrograde group 44 cross-sections. In the evaluation of OCT after high speed debulking, the debulked area (0.76 mm2 [0.58-0.91] vs. 0.53 mm2 [0.36-0.68], p < 0.001) and the depth of debulked area (0.76 mm [0.58-0.91] vs. 0.53 mm [0.36-0.68], p < 0.001) were significantly higher in only-antegrade group compared to only-retrograde group. The debulked bias and the width of debulked area are not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to only-retrograde debulking, only-antegrade debulking acquired larger debulked area because of larger cutting depth, although the debulked bias and the width of debulked area were comparable between the two groups.

JETWING technique: Combination therapy of JETSTREAMⓇ and aggressive wire recanalization in calcified atheroma and dilatation technique for eccentric heavy calcified plaques using WINGMAN for insertion of protection wire.

Although endovascular treatment (EVT) has developed and still progressing, calcified lesions remain a big challenge to operators in obtaining good results. Whenever, the eccentric and calcified plaques or nodules are present, balloon dilatation may be difficult and vascular complications may frequently occur. We present a 73-year-old woman, with severe, eccentric, calcified lesion in the right superficial femoral artery (SFA). First, we performed the aggressive wire recanalization in calcified atheroma and dilatation (ARCADIA) technique for the eccentric plaques. Then, we used a WingmanⓇ crossing catheter (ReFlow Medical, Inc.) to penetrate and pass through the calcifications and eventually exchanged to a ParachuteⓇ (Good Care, Inc.) filter wire. Finally, we performed rotational atherectomy using the JETSTREAMⓇ (Boston Scientific) rotational atherectomy device for debulking to obtain good lesion expansion and was able to avoid potential complications. Performing ARCADIA technique then using a Wingman catheter for inserting a filter wire before JETSTREAMⓇ atherectomy is safe and effective for heavily calcified, eccentric lesions. Further studies will be needed to validate the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Midterm outcomes of rotational atherectomy-assisted endovascular treatment of severe peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the midterm results of atherectomy-assisted angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions and the identification of possible subgroups of patients with superior outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, physician-initiated, nonindustry-sponsored retrospective analysis of patients with Rutherford category ranging from II to V and de novo occlusive or stenotic lesions of the superficial femoral (SFA) and/or popliteal arteries treated with atherectomy-assisted angioplasty (Jetstream rotational atherectomy + drug-eluting ballooning). In cases of subintimal recanalization or patients without an SFA stamp, with previous ipsilateral bypass surgery, systemic coagulopathy, end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, life expectancy of <12 months, and intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, and/or heparin were excluded. RESULTS: In a total of 103 enrolled patients, the median SFA and/or popliteal lesion length was 80 mm (interquartile range, 61.2 mm) with 73 lesions being occlusive (70.9%) and 84 (81.5%) classified as Fanelli calcification score 3 and 4. Technical success was met in 96.1% of cases (n = 99) at a median operative time of 108 minutes. Adjunctive stenting was needed in 10 patients (9.8%). At a median follow-up of 18.0 ± 10.8 months, Rutherford class clinical improvement was present in 77 patients (74.8%), and 7 patients (6.79%) presented target lesion occlusion needing reintervention in 6 cases (5.82%). The primary patency rates were 97% at 12 months and 83% at 24 months with secondary patency rates of 99% at 12 months and 91% at 24 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences when treating differently located lesions, diabetic vs nondiabetic patients, or comparing experienced vs nonexperienced operators. CONCLUSIONS: The use of rotational atherectomy and drug-eluting balloons for the treatment of severe femoropopliteal disease showed relatively low need for bailout stenting and good midterm primary patency rates. The influence of lesion location, diabetes mellitus, or operator experience did not show statistically different results in terms of patency. Longer term outcomes and comparative analysis are needed to consolidate further clinical evidence.

Acute and mid-term results of percutaneous coronary intervention for severely calcified coronary artery lesions with orbital atherectomy system.

OBJECTIVES: Severely calcified lesions present many challenges for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the orbital atherectomy system (OAS) in treating calcified coronary lesions. METHODS: The present study included 422 consecutive cases (546 lesions) who underwent PCI with OAS in Kyoto Katsura Hospital from February 2018 to December 2021. We assessed the following clinical outcomes after OAS was used for severely calcified lesions: procedure success, angiographic complications, in-hospital Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), and mid-term results. The primary endpoint was the combination of incidence of MACE at 12 months, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: Of all the cases, 74% patients were men and the mean age was 76.5 years. In total, 81% of lesions were treated with drug-coated balloon, and 14% were implanted with stents. Procedural success rate was 96.3%. Coronary perforation occurred in 0.5% and persistent slow flow in 2% lesions. There was 1 cardiac death (0.5%), 43 periprocedural MIs (10.2%), and no TLR as in-hospital MACE. The incidence of MACE at 12 months was 8.4%, including 2.1% cardiac death and 6.9% TLR. In multivariate analysis, CKD, hemodialysis, and restenosis lesions were independently associated with MACE at 12 months. Periprocedural MI was not an independent predictor of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that OAS is a safe and effective treatment option for calcified coronary lesions with acceptable acute and mid-term results; thus, it can be an alternate for reducing calcified plaque.

Direct Comparison of Rotational vs Orbital Atherectomy for Calcified Lesions Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography.

BACKGROUND: There are several retrospective studies comparing rotational atherectomy (RA) and orbital atherectomy (OA), but all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in those studies were not performed under intracoronary imaging guidance. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the efficacy and safety of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PCI with RA vs OA. METHODS: The DIRO (To directly compare RA and OA for calcified lesions, a prospective randomized trial) trial was conducted. We enrolled patients with de novo calcified lesions (arc >180°) assessed by OCT or angiographically moderate or severe calcifications if the OCT catheter could not cross the lesion before any intervention. Eligible patients were randomly 1:1 allocated to lesion preparation with RA vs OA. Stent expansion was defined as the minimum stent area divided by the distal reference area multiplied by 100. Tissue modification was assessed using preatherectomy and postatherectomy OCT images. Procedural outcomes including periprocedural myocardial infarctions were evaluated. Furthermore, clinical events and vascular healing evaluated by OCT at 8 months postprocedure were assessed. RESULTS: The stent expansion was significantly greater in the RA group vs the OA group (99.5% vs 90.6%; P = 0.02). The maximum atherectomy area was significantly larger in the RA group than in the OA group (1.34 [IQR: 1.02-1.89] mm2 vs 0.83 [IQR: 0.59-1.11] mm2; P = 0.004). The procedural outcomes and clinical events at 8 months did not differ between the groups. The vascular healing was sufficient in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prospective randomized DIRO trial revealed that RA could produce a more favorable tissue modification, which may lead to a larger stent expansion than OA in heavily calcified lesions.

[Endovascular therapy for peripheral arterial disease]. / Interventionelle Therapie der peripheren arteriellen Verschlusskrankheit.

In addition to conservative therapy with intensive walking training, endovascular revascularisation and open vascular surgical revascularisation are of high importance in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Over the past decades, endovascular therapy has developed considerably and is now the treatment of choice for most vascular segments. The use of different devices has been shown to be beneficial for different vessel segments. Primary stent angioplasty has been shown to be superior to balloon angioplasty with secondary stent implantation for the treatment of iliac lesions. Femoropopliteal, the use of paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty is recommended. A mortality signal shown in a meta-analysis was not confirmed. With directional atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy, different options for plaque modification are available. The cytostatic drug sirolimus as another antirestenotic substance still has to be investigated in large, randomised trials. A final assessment of the effectiveness and safety is not yet possible. Infrapopliteal balloon angioplasty remains the standard treatment. After interventional therapy, regular follow-up is recommended.