Comparative Analysis of Transoral Endoscopic Parathyroidectomy Vestibular Approach and Focused Open Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND Primary hyperparathyroidism is one of the most common endocrine disorders, for which the definitive treatment is surgical parathyroidectomy. Generally, surgical exploration is performed as open focused neck surgery. The vestibular route is a new approach to minimally invasive endoscopic parathyroidectomy. This retrospective study from a single center in Turkey aimed to compare surgical outcomes from the transoral endoscopic vestibular approach (TOEPVA) vs direct open parathyroidectomy in 57 patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our study included data from 57 patients. TOEPVA was performed in 20 of these patients who did not want a cervical scar, and focused surgery was performed in the remaining 37 patients. The variables we analyzed were size, volume, and localization of the adenoma, operative time, presence of bleeding, presence of the recurrent laryngeal nerve damage, preoperative, short-term, and long-term postoperative PTH levels, use of drain, presence of postoperative hypocalcemia, and short-term and long-term calcium levels. RESULTS No laryngeal nerve and mental nerve damage was observed in either group. The mean operative time in focused open surgery was 80.54±33.1 min, while the mean operative time in TOEPVA was 128.21±30.88 (p: 0.794) min. The mean hospitalization period of patients who underwent open surgery was 3.29±1.9 days, while the mean discharge days of patients who underwent endoscopic surgery was 2.40±1.2. (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS TOEPVA is a safe method in patients who underwent parthyroid surgery to avoid cervical scarring.

Complications after Nuss bar removal procedure for pectus excavatum. Analysis and proposal of a safety protocol. / Complicaciones tras retirada de barra de Nuss en pectus excavatum. Análisis y propuesta de un protocolo de seguridad.

OBJECTIVE: The Nuss bar removal procedure may bring about different complications. Some are mild while others can be life-threatening. An adequate surgery setup and the fulfilment of some security steps may reduce their incidence. This study aims to analyze our experience with the complications that occurred during bar removal and our safety protocol for the prevention and management of these complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational cohort study from a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent Nuss bar removal from November 2013 to March 2022 at a University hospital. Variables analyzed include patients' demographics; presence of comorbidities; time elapsed from bar placement to removal, and the occurrence of operative and postoperative complications. Study written under the 'PROCESS Guideline'. RESULTS: Fourty (40) patients were included in the study; 37 were male. One bar was removed in 17 patients and two in 22 patients. Median age at surgery: 17.5 years (Percentile 25-75%: 16.75-19.25). Time elapsed from placement to removal: 26 months (Percentile 25-75%: 23.75-30.25). Complications: 10 in 9 patients (22.5%); 6 Clavien-Dindo class I (67%); 2 class II (22%); 1 class IIIb, 1 class IV. The hemorrhagic complication motivated the development of a safety protocol to reduce incidence of complications. CONCLUSION: Nuss bar removal is a safe procedure with usually scant complications. Nonetheless, these may be serious sometimes. To prevent them, a protocol for a safe procedure is important.

OBJETIVO: La retirada de la barra de Nuss puede provocar diversas complicaciones, algunas leves y otras potencialmente mortales. Su incidencia puede verse reducida con una preparación quirúrgica adecuada y siguiendo ciertos pasos de seguridad. El presente estudio tiene por objeto analizar nuestra experiencia con las complicaciones acontecidas durante la retirada de la barra, así como nuestro protocolo de seguridad para la prevención y el manejo de dichas complicaciones. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio de cohortes observacional llevado a cabo a partir del análisis retrospectivo de todos los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de retirada de barra de Nuss entre noviembre de 2013 y marzo de 2022 en un hospital universitario. Se analizaron las siguientes variables: demografía de los pacientes, presencia de comorbilidades, tiempo desde la colocación de la barra hasta su retirada, y complicaciones operatorias y postoperatorias. El estudio se realizó conforme a las directrices de la PROCESS Guideline. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a 40 pacientes, 37 de ellos varones. En 17 pacientes se retiró una barra, y en 22, dos. La edad media en el momento de la cirugía fue de 17,5 años (percentil 25-75%: 16,75 - 19,25). El tiempo transcurrido desde la colocación hasta la retirada fue de 26 meses (percentil 25-75%: 23,75 - 30,25). Se registraron 10 complicaciones en 9 pacientes (22,5%), 6 de clase I según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo (67%), 2 de clase II (22%), 1 de clase IIIb y 1 de clase IV. La complicación hemorrágica motivó la creación de un protocolo de seguridad para disminuir la incidencia de las complicaciones. CONCLUSION: La retirada de la barra de Nuss es un procedimiento seguro, habitualmente con escasas complicaciones, aunque en ocasiones pueden ser graves. Para evitarlas, es importante contar con un protocolo que garantice la seguridad.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of OLIF and TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the difference in clinical efficacy between two surgical approaches, oblique lateral approach and intervertebral foraminal approach, in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: English databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science, were systematically searched using keywords such as "oblique lumbar interbody fusion" and "transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion." Concurrently, Chinese databases, including CNKI, WanFang data, VIP, and CBM, were also queried using corresponding Chinese terms. The search spanned from January 2014 to February 2024, focusing on published studies in both Chinese and English that compared the clinical efficacy of OLIF and TLIF. The literature screening was conducted by reviewing titles, abstracts, and full texts. Literature meeting the inclusion criteria underwent quality assessment, and relevant data were extracted. Statistical analysis and a meta-analysis of the observational data for both surgical groups were performed using Excel and RevMan 5.4 software. Findings revealed a total of 14 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, encompassing 877 patients. Of these, 414 patients were in the OLIF group, while 463 were in the TLIF group. Meta-analysis of the statistical data revealed that compared to TLIF, OLIF had a shorter average surgical duration (P < 0.05), reduced intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.05), shorter average hospital stay (P < 0.05), better improvement in postoperative VAS scores (P < 0.05), superior enhancement in postoperative ODI scores (P < 0.05), more effective restoration of disc height (P < 0.05), and better correction of lumbar lordosis (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between OLIF and TLIF in terms of the incidence of surgical complications (P > 0.05) and fusion rates (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: When treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, OLIF demonstrates significant advantages over TLIF in terms of shorter surgical duration, reduced intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stay, superior improvement in postoperative VAS and ODI scores, better restoration of disc height, and more effective correction of lumbar lordosis.

Pros and Cons of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

This paper reviews current knowledge on minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). Although it has significant advantages, such as less postoperative pain, short hospital stay, quick return to work, better cosmetics, and less infection rate, there are also disadvantages. The long learning curve, the need for special instruments and types of equipment, high costs, lack of tactile sensation and biplanar imaging, some complications that are hard to treat, and more radiation to the surgeon and surgical team are the disadvantages.Most studies remark that the outcomes of MISS are similar to traditional surgery. Although patients demand it more than surgeons, we predict the broad applications of MISS will replace most of our classical surgical approaches.

Da Vinci Robotic Surgical System: Early Experience from Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of robotic surgeries using the Da Vinci robotic surgical system (DVSS) at Pakistan's largest urological tertiary healthcare system. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Division of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan, from March 2017 to December 2021. METHODOLOGY: Hospital records of patients who underwent robotic urological surgeries were assessed for their outcomes in terms of blood loss, mortality, system malfunction, and conversion to open surgery. Descriptive statistics were determined. RESULTS: A total of 550 procedures were performed. The mean age recorded was 39.58±16.83 years. The mean blood loss recorded was 255.611±353.57 ml; there were 3 cases of malfunction. Forty cases were converted to open surgery, and the mortality rate was 1.1%. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgical techniques have high precision, fewer complications, and lower morbidity rates. Using DVSS for surgical interventions is both effective and safe. KEY WORDS: Minimally invasive surgery, Da Vinci robotic surgical system, Robotic surgery.

New direction for surgery: Super minimally invasive surgery.

The top goal of modern medicine is treating disease without destroying organ structures and making patients as healthy as they were before their sickness. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has dominated the surgical realm because of its lesser invasiveness. However, changes in anatomical structures of the body and reconstruction of internal organs or different organs are common after traditional surgery or MIS, decreasing the quality of life of patients post-operation. Thus, I propose a new treatment mode, super MIS (SMIS), which is defined as "curing a disease or lesion which used to be treated by MIS while preserving the integrity of the organs". In this study, I describe the origin, definition, operative channels, advantages, and future perspectives of SMIS.

ADVANCES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR PECTUS EXCAVATUM: ENHANCING OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE.

Pectus excavatum, also called sunken chest, is the most common deformation of the sternum (90%). The deformation is caused by the depression of the sternum and costal cartilages, which causes reduction of the chest cavity and dysfunction of cardio-pulmonary systems in it. Sunken chest is more common in males than females, prevalence is 5/1. Most of the cases appear in the first year of life, however severity of the pathology is formed during puberty. Etiopathogenesis, genetic factors, and associated diseases of Pectus Excavatum are various and are still the subject of study. The manifestation of the disease is determined by the degree of chest deformation, which is calculated using the "Haller index". Providing that a high degree of deformation can lead to pathological functioning of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. The treatment of this condition is an urgent, complex, and developing issue. The main method of treatment for sunken chest is surgical intervention; However, in cases of mild degrees of the mentioned deformation, different approaches are used. Our goal is to discuss contrasting treatment techniques and present our improved repairing technique for sunken chest, which is performed in Georgia.

Trial of Early Minimally Invasive Removal of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Trials of surgical evacuation of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages have generally shown no functional benefit. Whether early minimally invasive surgical removal would result in better outcomes than medical management is not known. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized trial involving patients with an acute intracerebral hemorrhage, we assessed surgical removal of the hematoma as compared with medical management. Patients who had a lobar or anterior basal ganglia hemorrhage with a hematoma volume of 30 to 80 ml were assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, within 24 hours after the time that they were last known to be well, to minimally invasive surgical removal of the hematoma plus guideline-based medical management (surgery group) or to guideline-based medical management alone (control group). The primary efficacy end point was the mean score on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale (range, 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better outcomes, according to patients' assessment) at 180 days, with a prespecified threshold for posterior probability of superiority of 0.975 or higher. The trial included rules for adaptation of enrollment criteria on the basis of hemorrhage location. A primary safety end point was death within 30 days after enrollment. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were enrolled, of whom 30.7% had anterior basal ganglia hemorrhages and 69.3% had lobar hemorrhages. After 175 patients had been enrolled, an adaptation rule was triggered, and only persons with lobar hemorrhages were enrolled. The mean score on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale at 180 days was 0.458 in the surgery group and 0.374 in the control group (difference, 0.084; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.005 to 0.163; posterior probability of superiority of surgery, 0.981). The mean between-group difference was 0.127 (95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.035 to 0.219) among patients with lobar hemorrhages and -0.013 (95% Bayesian credible interval, -0.147 to 0.116) among those with anterior basal ganglia hemorrhages. The percentage of patients who had died by 30 days was 9.3% in the surgery group and 18.0% in the control group. Five patients (3.3%) in the surgery group had postoperative rebleeding and neurologic deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in whom surgery could be performed within 24 hours after an acute intracerebral hemorrhage, minimally invasive hematoma evacuation resulted in better functional outcomes at 180 days than those with guideline-based medical management. The effect of surgery appeared to be attributable to intervention for lobar hemorrhages. (Funded by Nico; ENRICH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02880878.).

True significance of the number of retrieved lymph nodes in stage II colon cancer resected by minimally invasive surgery: Influence of tumor sidedness.

BACKGROUND: In patients with stage II colon cancer (CC) undergoing minimally invasive surgery, the association between the clinical significance of lymph node yield and tumor localization remains unknown. We aimed to determine the optimal number of lymph nodes to be retrieved based on tumor localization in patients with stage II CC undergoing minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Overall, 263 patients with stage II CC who underwent laparoscopic surgery between January 1, 2008 and December 31 were enrolled. The primary outcome was the optimal number of lymph nodes retrieved based on tumor localization. RESULTS: The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 30 and 26 in the right-(n = 125) and left-sided (n = 138) CC groups, respectively (p = .0007). Inadequate dissection (<12 nodes) occurred in 4.2% of patients: 1.6% in the right-sided CC group and 6.5% in the left-sided CC group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a decreasing trend in adjusted hazard ratios with increasing nodes, with an optimal cutoff of 15 lymph nodes in the left-sided CC group (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.868; 95% confidence interval, 1.247-27.62; p = .02). Lymph node yield was not independently associated with survival in the right-sided CC group. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with left-sided stage II CC undergoing laparoscopic surgery, aiming for at least 15 retrieved lymph nodes may be optimal for accurate staging and prognostic assessment. The optimal lymph node yield likely varies based on tumor location, requiring further investigation in right-sided CC.

Quality of life after robotic versus conventional minimally invasive cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Optimizing postoperative quality of life (QoL) is an essential aspect of surgical oncology. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) decreases surgical morbidity and improves QoL outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to compare post-operative QoL after oncologic resections using different MIS modalities. The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases were searched for articles that compared post-operative QoL in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) or laparoscopic surgery (LS) versus robotic surgery (RS) for malignancy. Quality assessment was performed using the ROBINS-I and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) tools. Meta-analysis was performed using an inverse-variance random effects model. 27 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). 15 studies had a low risk of bias, while 11 had a moderate risk of bias and 1 had serious risk of bias. 8330 patients (RS: 5090, LS/VATS: 3240) from across 25 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Global QoL was significantly better after robotic surgery in the pooled analysis overall (SMD: - 0.28 [95% CI: - 0.49, - 0.08]), as well as in the prostatectomy and gastrectomy subgroups. GRADE certainty of evidence was low. Analysis of EPIC-26 subdomains also suggested greater sexual function after robotic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy. Robotic and conventional MIS approaches produce similar postoperative QoL after oncologic surgery for various tumor types, although advantages may emerge in some patient populations. Our results may assist surgeons in counseling patients who are undergoing oncologic surgery.

Evaluation of microbial occurrence in reusable robotic instruments for minimally invasive surgery: A pilot study.

In recent decades, minimally invasive surgery has become the favoured surgical technique, with increasing utilisation of robotic surgery to enhance patient outcomes. However, the design complexity of surgical robotic instruments can pose challenges in maintaining adequate cleaning, disinfection and sterilisation-particularly of the device's interior. In our hospital, robotic instruments are reused for a maximum of ten successive patients, following the manufacturer's guidelines. To the best of our knowledge, neither the manufacturer nor ISO standards have specified any methods to determine the sterility of robotic instruments after cleaning, disinfection and sterilisation procedures. In a small pilot study, we used a locally developed protocol to evaluate the sterility of 20 da Vinci SI robotic instruments, with the aim of determining whether the recommended cleaning, disinfection and sterilisation process is adequate to achieve safe usage in subsequent patients. None of the 20 instruments showed viable micro-organisms, therefore the robotic instruments were considered sterile, and suitable for re-use. We recommend our protocol to other hospitals, to be used as an essential control element in the assessment of their unique reprocessing technique for robotic instruments.

Early result of percutaneous full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-level lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy of percutaneous full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD). METHODS: From July 2020 to July 2021, 93 patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion procedure were retrospective analysis. The patients were divided into Endo-TLIF group and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) group. General demographic and perioperative data were recorded, the clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI). The disk height (DH) was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All of the surgical procedures were successfully completed, and the patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Intraoperative blood loss, drainage volume, time to independent ambulation and hospital length of stay in the Endo-TLIF group were significantly decreased in comparison with the open TLIF group (p < 0.05). The VAS for back pain on postoperative 7 day and ODI on postoperative 1 month were lower in the Endo-TLIF group than in the open TLIF group (P < 0.05), but no significant difference at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively (P > 0.05). The VAS score of leg pain had no demographic statistically significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05). The DH were significantly heightened after surgery compared to the preoperative height (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Endo-TLIF is a minimally invasive, safety surgery which can achieve comparable short-term effects as open TLIF. It may be a promising option for the treatment of LDD.

A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques and Standard Open Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar disc herniation is a common spinal disease that causes low back pain; surgery is required when conservative treatment is ineffective. There is a growing demand for minimally invasive surgery in younger patient populations due to their fear of significant damage and a long recovery period following standard open discectomy. The development history of minimally invasive surgery is relatively short, and no gold standard has been established. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to find, via a network meta-analysis, the best treatment for low back pain in younger patient populations. STUDY DESIGN: Network meta-analysis. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched. Data quality was evaluated using RevMan 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre for The Cochrane Collaboration), while STATA 14.0 (StataCorp LLC) was used for the network meta-analysis and to merge data on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, complication, blood loss, reoperation rate, and function score. RESULTS: We included 50 randomized controlled trials, involving 7 interventions; heterogeneity and inconsistency were acceptable. Comparatively, microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy were the best surgical procedures from the aspects of VAS score and ODI score, while standard open discectomy was the worst one from the aspect of ODI score. Regarding complications, tubular discectomy was preferred with the fewest complications. Additionally, microendoscopic discectomy outperformed other surgical procedures in reducing blood loss and reoperation rate. LIMITATIONS: First, follow-up data were not reported in all included studies, and the follow-up time varied from several months to 8 years, which affected the results accuracy of our study to some extent. Second, there were some nonsurgical factors that also affected the self-reported outcomes, such as rehabilitation and pain management, which also brought a certain bias in our study results. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to standard open discectomy, minimally invasive surgical procedures not only achieve satisfactory efficacy, but also microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy can obtain a more satisfactory short-term VAS score and ODI score. Microendoscopic discectomy has significant advantages in blood loss and reoperation rate, and tubular discectomy has fewer postoperative complications.

Wound infection and healing in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis compared with intramedullary nail for distal tibial fractures: A meta-analysis.

To systematically explore the effects of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) versus intramedullary nail (IMN) on wound infection and wound healing in patients with distal tibia fractures. A computerised search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was performed, from their inception to October 2023, to identify relevant studies on the application of MIPO and IMN in patients with distal tibial fractures. The quality of the included literature was evaluated by two researchers based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and basic information of the literature was collected, with wound infection, postoperative complications and wound healing time as the main indicators for analysis. Stata 17.0 software was applied for analysis. Overall, 23 papers and 2099 patients were included, including 1026 patients in the MIPO group and 1073 patients in the IMN group. The results revealed, when compared with IMN treatment, patients with distal tibia fractures who underwent MIPO treatment had a lower incidence of postoperative complications (OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.25-0.42, p < 0.001) and a shorter wound healing time (SMD = -1.00, 95% CI: -1.51 to -0.49, p < 0.001), but the incidence of postoperative wound infection was higher (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.35-3.01, p = 0.001). Both MIPO and IMN are excellent treatments for distal tibia fractures. MIPO is effective in reducing the incidence of complications as well as shortening the time of wound healing time but increases the risk of wound infection. In clinical practice, surgeons can make individual choices based on the patient's wishes and proficiency in both techniques.

Evaluation of the learning curve and complications in unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: cumulative sum analysis and risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the learning curve and complications in unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) using the Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis and Risk-adjusted Cumulative Sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 184 consecutive patients who received ULIF in our hospital, including 104 males and 80 females. CUSUM analysis and RA-CUSUM analysis were used to evaluate the learning curve of ULIF based on the operation time and surgical failure rate, respectively. All postoperative complications were defined as surgical failure. Variables of different phases were compared based on the learning curve. RESULTS: The CUSUM analysis showed the cutoff point for ULIF was 29 cases, and the RA-CUSUM analysis showed the cutoff point for ULIF was 41 cases. Operating time and hospital stay were significantly decreased as the learning curve progressed (P < 0.05). Visual analogue score (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) at the last follow-up were significantly lower than preoperatively. At the last follow-up, a total of 171 patients reached intervertebral fusion, with a fusion rate of 92.9% (171/184). A total of eleven complications were observed, and RA-CUSUM analysis showed that the incidence of complications in the early phase was 17.07% and in the late phase was 2.6%, with a significant difference (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ULIF is an effective minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgical technique. But a learning curve of at least 29 cases will be required to master ULIF, while 41 cases will be required to achieve a stable surgical success rate.