Finger Thoracostomy for Tension Pneumothorax.

One of the injuries associated with chest trauma is pneumothorax, a condition where air accumulates between the parietal and visceral pleura in the chest leading to collapse of the lung due to pressure. Left untreated, a tension pneumothorax may develop leading to cardiovascular collapse. This article reviews the development of a tension pneumothorax, discusses the clinical recognition of the diagnosis, and outlines the procedure for performing a finger (or simple) thoracostomy. A simple mnemonic for the procedure is offered as a memory aid to reduce cognitive load for this procedure.

Validation of the 35-mm rule in traumatic pneumothorax in an Asian population.

OBJECTIVES: Thoracic injury crucially threatens human health. Recent studies have suggested using computed tomography (CT) to observe traumatic pneumothorax (PTX). However, cross-ethnic validation is required to overcome potential barriers for the global application of this method. This study aimed to validate the 35-mm rule in traumatic PTX in a Korean population. METHODS: Data from the institutional registry were analyzed, and chest CT images were reviewed. Factors for observation failure were evaluated via logistic regression analysis, and a receiver-operating curve was created to calculate the optimal cutoff value. RESULTS: In total, 286 participants were included in this study. The average PTX size was 8.2 (3.2-26.5) mm, and 210 of 213 (95.3%) initially observed patients with a PTX size of ≤35 mm successfully completed the safety observation. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that a PTX size of >35 mm is associated with observation failure and suggested a cutoff of 24.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Most patients with traumatic PTX of ≤35 mm on CT had undergone successful 4-h observation without thoracostomy. Additionally, PTX of >35 mm was an independent risk factor for observation failure. Considering the lower optimal cutoff value and high failure rates observed in this study, the current guidelines need modifications.

Interfacility Transport of Children with Traumatic Pneumothorax: Does Elevation Make a Difference?

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic pneumothorax (PTX) remains a source of significant morbidity and mortality in pediatric trauma patients. Management with tube thoracostomy is routinely dictated by symptoms, use of positive pressure ventilation, or plan for air transport. Many patients transferred to our pediatric trauma center (PTC) require transport at considerable elevation. We sought to characterize the effect of transport at elevation in this population to inform management recommendations. METHODS: The trauma registry was queried for pediatric patients transferred to our tertiary referral center with traumatic PTX from 2010 to 2022, yielding 412 charts for analysis. Data abstracted included mechanism of injury, mode of transport, size of pneumothorax, chest tube placement, endotracheal intubation, and estimated elevation change during transport. RESULTS: There were 412 patients included for analysis. Most patients had small pneumothoraces that resolved without chest tube placement (388 patients, 94.1%). No patients experienced acute respiratory decompensation in transport. There were four (0.9%) patients with increased PTX on arrival, however, none experienced acute decompensation as a result. Average elevation gain was 2337 feet. There was no association between elevation change and requirement of post-transport chest tube placement. No patients experienced PTX-related complications after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In this large patient series, no patient experienced a meaningful increase in the size of their traumatic PTX during or immediately following transport at elevation to our institution. These findings suggest it is safe to transfer a pediatric trauma patient with a small, hemodynamically insignificant PTX without tube thoracostomy despite considerable changes in elevation during transport. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: II-III, Retrospective Study.

Chest X-Ray Remains a Vital Component Prior to Tube Thoracostomy.

INTRODUCTION: The identification and treatment of traumatic pneumothorax (PTX) has long been a focus of bedside imaging in the trauma patient. While the emergence of bedside ultrasound (BUS) provides an opportunity for earlier detection, the need for tube thoracostomy (TT) based on bedside imaging, including BUS and supine AP chest X-ray (CXR) is less established in the medical literature. METHODS: Retrospective data from 2017 to 2020 were collected of all adult trauma activations at a level 1 rural trauma facility. Every adult patient included in this study received a CXR and BUS (eFast) upon arrival. The need for TT was determined by the emergency medicine attending or the trauma surgery attending evaluating the patient. McNemar's chi-squared test and conditional logistic regression analysis were performed comparing BUS, CXR, and the combination of BUS and CXR findings for the need for TT. Subgroup analyses were performed comparing BUS, CXR, and the combination of BUS and CXR for the detection of PTX compared to CT scan. RESULTS: Of the 12,244 patients who underwent trauma activation during this timeframe, 602 were included in the study. 74.9% were males with an age range of 36-63 years. Of the 602 patients, 210 received TT. Positive PTX was recorded with BUS in 128 (21%) patients with 16 false negatives (FNs) and 98 false positives (FPs), 100 (17%) PTX were identified with CXR with 114 FNs and 4 FPs, and 72 (11.9%) were noted on both CXR and BUS with 140 FNs and 2 FPs. The odds ratio of TT placement was 22 times with positive BUS alone (P < .0001, 95% CI: 10.9-43.47), 47 times with positive CXR alone (P < .0001, 95% CI: 16.99-127.5), and 70 times with both positive CXR and BUS (P < .0001, 95% CI: 17.08-288.4). CONCLUSION: A positive finding of PTX on BUS combined with CXR is more indicative of the need for TT in the trauma patient when compared with BUS or CXR alone.

Routine chest radiography after thoracostomy tube removal and during postoperative follow-up is not necessary after lung resection.

OBJECTIVES: The need for routine chest radiography following chest tube removal after elective pulmonary resection may be unnecessary in most patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of eliminating routine chest radiography in these patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective pulmonary resection, excluding pneumonectomy, for benign or malignant indications between 2007 and 2013 were reviewed. Patients with in-hospital mortality or without routine follow-up were excluded. During this interval, our practice transitioned from ordering routine chest radiography after chest tube removal and at the first postoperative clinic visit to obtaining imaging based on symptomatology. The primary outcome was changes in management from results of chest radiography obtained routinely versus for symptoms. Characteristics and outcomes were compared using the Student t test and chi-square analyses. RESULTS: A total of 322 patients met inclusion criteria. Ninety-three patients underwent a routine same-day post-pull chest radiography, and 229 patients did not. Thirty-three patients (14.4%) in the nonroutine chest radiography cohort received imaging for symptoms, in whom 8 (24.2%) resulted in management changes. Only 3.2% of routine post-pull chest radiography resulted in management changes versus 3.5% of unplanned chest radiography with no adverse outcomes (P = .905). At outpatient postoperative follow-up, 146 patients received routine chest radiography; none resulted in a change in management. Of the 176 patients who did not have planned chest radiography at follow-up, 12 (6.8%) underwent chest radiography for symptoms. Two of these patients required readmission and chest tube reinsertion. CONCLUSIONS: Reserving imaging for patients with symptoms after chest tube removal and follow-up after elective lung resections resulted in a higher percentage of meaningful changes in clinical management.

Temporal changes in the prehospital management of trauma patients: 2014-2021.

INTRODUCTION: Aggressive prehospital interventions (PHI) in trauma may not improve outcomes compared to prioritizing rapid transport. The aim of this study was to quantify temporal changes in the frequency of PHI performed by EMS. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adult patients transported by EMS to our trauma center from January 1, 2014 to 12/31/2021. PHI were recorded and annual changes in their frequency were assessed via year-by-year trend analysis and multivariate regression. RESULTS: Between the first and last year of the study period, the frequency of thoracostomy (6% vs. 9%, p â€‹= â€‹0.001), TXA administration (0.3% vs. 33%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001), and whole blood administration (0% vs. 20%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) increased. Advanced airway procedures (21% vs. 12%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and IV fluid administration (57% vs. 36%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) decreased. ED mortality decreased from 8% to 5% (p â€‹= â€‹0.001) over the study period. On multivariate regression, no PHI were independently associated with increased or decreased ED mortality. CONCLUSION: PHI have changed significantly over the past eight years. However, no PHI were independently associated with increased or decreased ED mortality.

[Crucial Techniques for Chest Tube Placement and Postoperative Management].

Postoperative management of thoracic surgery with an indwelling chest tube is common, and knowledge about it is essential. A postoperative chest tube has four roles:1) to reinflate the lung, 2) to observe the condition of the thoracic cavity and acquire information regarding the outcomes, 3) to prevent complications, and 4) to treat pulmonary air leaks and empyema (chemical pleurodesis et ct). Although postoperative complications have decreased in recent years following advances in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery( VATS) and devices such as stapling devices and vascular sealing systems (VSS), postoperative chest tube placement is still common. Therefore, a thorough knowledge of chest tube management is extremely important in thoracic surgery. Here, we have described, in detail, the management of a postoperative chest tube at our hospital.

[Postoperative Complications of Open Window Thoracostomy:Report of a Case].

While open window thoracostomy is used to treat empyema with a high rate of infection control, it is an invasive procedure that leads to a decline in the quality of life. An 80-year-old man who had undergone wedge resection for pulmonary nodules subsequently developed postoperative empyema and underwent open window thoracostomy. After thoracostomy, the patient developed several complications, including bleeding from the lung surface and air leakage. Window closure was planned at this time;however, the plan was scuttled due to his low nutritional status and pulmonary air leakage. After the patient's condition improved with persistent conservative treatment, window closure was performed, and he overcame his complications. Patients with postoperative empyema requiring thoracostomy are at a high risk of developing postoperative complications. Therefore, it is important to manage the patients' condition persistently so that they can receive window closure at an appropriate time.

A Case Report of Tension Hydrothorax Incited by Bowel Perforation.

We report the case of a 34-year-old man who developed cardiac arrest due to tension hydrothorax from colonic perforation. Tension hydrothorax, an entity characterized by pleural effusion leading to mediastinal compression, has not been reported in association with intraabdominal inflammation. Our patient developed respiratory insufficiency after repair of colonic perforation, followed by respiratory failure and cardiac arrest. Transthoracic echocardiography provided rapid diagnosis during decompensation and prompted a lifesaving thoracostomy. Clinicians should consider tension hydrothorax as a rare cause of hemodynamic collapse, even in the absence of liver failure, and use bedside tools like transthoracic echocardiography to facilitate diagnosis and intervention.

DraiNet: AI-driven decision support in pneumothorax and pleural effusion management.

OBJECTIVE: This study presents DraiNet, a deep learning model developed to detect pneumothorax and pleural effusion in pediatric patients and aid in assessing the necessity for tube thoracostomy. The primary goal is to utilize DraiNet as a decision support tool to enhance clinical decision-making in the management of these conditions. METHODS: DraiNet was trained on a diverse dataset of pediatric CT scans, carefully annotated by experienced surgeons. The model incorporated advanced object detection techniques and underwent evaluation using standard metrics, such as mean Average Precision (mAP), to assess its performance. RESULTS: DraiNet achieved an impressive mAP score of 0.964, demonstrating high accuracy in detecting and precisely localizing abnormalities associated with pneumothorax and pleural effusion. The model's precision and recall further confirmed its ability to effectively predict positive cases. CONCLUSION: The integration of DraiNet as an AI-driven decision support system marks a significant advancement in pediatric healthcare. By combining deep learning algorithms with clinical expertise, DraiNet provides a valuable tool for non-surgical teams and emergency room doctors, aiding them in making informed decisions about surgical interventions. With its remarkable mAP score of 0.964, DraiNet has the potential to enhance patient outcomes and optimize the management of critical conditions, including pneumothorax and pleural effusion.

Is there a common definition for massive pleurisy?

The concept of massive pleurisy (MP) is frequently used to emphasize the significance of the amount of pleural effusion. However, there are significant disagreements about it due to the lack of a universal definition for MP. In our study, we sought to elucidate these distinctions. We employed a questionnaire comprised of visual and true/false sections. In the visual section, participants were shown real-time lung radiographs and schematic drawings and asked which ones were MP. On the other hand, suggestions regarding diagnosis, treatment, and consultations for MP were questionnaired. The study was comprised of 150 physicians from four distinct centers. On true/false and radiograph questions, physicians from the same branch exhibited differences of up to 50% (p < 0.05). On the level question, each branch involved reached a consensus (p = 0.003). In questions 3, 4, and 5, which also contained a true-false section, the branches gave varying responses, with the exception of the opinion that tube thoracostomy is unquestionably indicated in MP (p < 0.05). Establishing a common language for MP is crucial for clinician collaboration and appropriate patient management. Our study elucidates the divergences of opinion between branches and highlights the need for a unified definition.

Successful Medical Management of Bilateral Pneumothorax Due to Nasogastric Tube Misplacement in a Cat.

A 7 yr old female spayed domestic shorthair was evaluated for suspected lily ingestion and acute vomiting. The cat had vomited suspected lily plant material before presentation, and a nasogastric tube (NGT) was placed to continue to administer activated charcoal. The NGT was passed with sedation and limited restraint. To confirm placement, a single lateral radiograph was taken, which showed that the tube was in the trachea, bronchus, through the pulmonary parenchyma, and extending into the region of the craniodorsal retroperitoneal space. The tube was subsequently removed, resulting in a tension pneumothorax. Bilateral thoracostomy tubes were placed and attached to continuous suction. The pneumothorax resolved after 2 days, the thoracostomy tubes were removed, and the cat was discharged on day 3 after admission. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first described pneumothorax complication with successful medical management secondary to routine nasogastric tube placement in a cat. This case report underscores the importance of preparedness for thoracostomy tube placement before removal of any NGT that has been confirmed to be placed through the pulmonary parenchyma.

Thoracostomy tube withdrawal during latter phases of expiration or inspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: In patients with thoracic injuries, tube thoracostomy is routinely employed. There is disagreement over which manner of tube withdrawal is best, the latter phases of expiration or inspiration. Considering several earlier investigations' inconsistent findings, their comparative effectiveness is still up for debate. In light of this, we carried out a systematic analysis of studies contrasting the withdrawal of thoracostomy tubes during the latter stages of expiration versus inspiration for traumatic chest injuries. Analyzed outcomes are recurrent pneumothoraces, reinsertion of the thoracostomy tube, and hospital stay. METHODS: We looked for papers comparing the withdrawal of the thoracostomy tube during the last stages of expiration and inspiration for the management of thoracic injuries on Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. Review Manager was used to determine mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) using a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The primary outcomes showed no significant difference between the inspiration and expiration groups: recurrent pneumothorax (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.83-1.93, P 0.28) and thoracostomy tube reinsertion (OR: 1.84, CI 0.50-6.86, P 0.36, I2 5%). However, the duration of hospital stay was significantly lower in patients in whom the thoracostomy tube was removed at the end of inspiration (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.49-2.11, P < 0.00001, I2 0%). The implications of these findings warrant cautious interpretation, accounting for potential confounding factors and inherent limitations that may shape their significance. CONCLUSION: The thoracostomy tube can be removed during both the end-expiratory and end-inspiratory stages of respiration with no appreciable difference. Nevertheless, caution should be exercised when ascertaining the implications of these findings, taking into account the potential limitations and confounding variables that may exert influence upon the outcomes.

Clinical outcomes of traumatic pneumothoraces undergoing conservative management following detection by prehospital physicians.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and transport characteristics of patients diagnosed with a suspected traumatic pneumothorax and managed conservatively by prehospital medical teams including secondary deterioration during transfer and the subsequent rate of in-hospital tube thoracostomy. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of all adult trauma patients diagnosed with a suspected pneumothorax on ultrasound and managed conservatively by their treating prehospital medical team between 2018 and 2020. Descriptive analysis was performed comparing patients who did and did not receive in-hospital tube thoracostomy. RESULTS: In total, 181 patients were diagnosed with suspected traumatic pneumothoraces on prehospital ultrasound of which 75 (41.4%) were managed conservatively by their treating medical team whilst 106 (58.6%) underwent pleural decompression. There were no recorded cases of emergent pleural decompression required in transit. Of the 75 conservatively managed patients, 42 (56%) had an intercostal catheter (ICC) placed within four hours of hospital arrival and another nine (17.6%) had an ICC placed between four- and 24-hours post-hospital arrival. There was no significant difference in prehospital clinical characteristics between patients who did and did not receive an in-hospital ICC. The detection of a pneumothorax on the initial chest x-ray and larger pneumothorax volume visualised on computed tomography imaging were significantly more common in patients receiving in-hospital ICCs. Aviation factors including flight altitude and duration of flight were not associated with subsequent in-hospital tube thoracostomy. CONCLUSION: Prehospital medical teams can safely identify patients who have a traumatic pneumothorax and can be transported to hospital without pleural decompression. Patient characteristics at the time of hospital arrival combined with the size of pneumothorax identified on imaging appear most likely to influence subsequent urgent in-hospital tube thoracostomy placement.

Are Chest Radiographs or Ultrasound More Accurate in Predicting a Pneumothorax or Need for a Thoracostomy Tube in Trauma Patients?

BACKGROUND: Historically, chest radiographs (CXR) have been used to quickly diagnose pneumothorax (PTX) and hemothorax in trauma patients. Over the last 2 decades, chest ultrasound (CUS) as part of Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (eFAST) has also become accepted as a modality for the early diagnosis of PTX in trauma patients. METHODS: We queried our institution's trauma databases for all trauma team activations from 2021 for patients with eFAST results. Demographics, injury variables, and the following were collected: initial eFAST CUS, CXR, computed tomography (CT) scan, and thoracostomy tube procedure notes. We then compared PTX detection rates on initial CXR and CUS to those on thoracic CT scans. RESULTS: 580 patients were included in the analysis after excluding patients without a chest CT scan within 2 hours of arrival. Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma was 68.4% sensitive and 87.5% specific for detecting a moderate-to-large PTX on chest CT, while CXR was 23.5% sensitive and 86.3% specific. Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma was 69.8% sensitive for predicting the need for tube thoracostomy, while CXR was 40.0% sensitive. DISCUSSION: At our institution, eFAST CUS was superior to CXR for diagnosing the presence of a PTX and predicting the need for a thoracostomy tube. However, neither test is accurate enough to diagnose a PTX nor predict if the patient will require a thoracostomy tube. Based on the specificity of both tests, a negative CXR or eFAST means there is a high probability that the patient does not have a PTX and will not need a chest tube.

Safety and Risk Factors of Needle Thoracentesis Decompression in Tension Pneumothorax in Patients over 75 Years Old.

Background: There are very few professional recommendations or guidelines on the needle thoracentesis decompression (NTD) for the tension pneumothorax in the elderly. This study aimed to investigate the safety and risk factors of tension pneumothorax NTD in patients over 75 years old based on CT evaluation of the chest wall thickness (CWT). Methods: The retrospective study was conducted among 136 in-patients over 75 years old. The CWT and closest depth to vital structure of the second intercostal space at the midclavicular line (second ICS-MCL) and the fifth intercostal space at the midaxillary line (fifth ICS-MAL) were compared as well as the expected failure rates and the incidence of severe complications of different needles. We also analyzed the influence of age, sex, presence or absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and body mass index (BMI) on CWT. Results: The CWT of the second ICS-MCL was smaller than the fifth ICS-MAL both on the left and the right side (P < 0.05). The success rate associated with a 7 cm needle was significantly higher than a 5 cm needle (P < 0.05), and the incidence of severe complications with a 7 cm needle was significantly less than an 8 cm needle (P < 0.05). The CWT of the second ICS-MCL was significantly correlated with age, sex, presence or absence of COPD, and BMI (P < 0.05), whereas the CWT of the fifth ICS-MAL was significantly correlated with sex and BMI (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The second ICS-MCL was recommended as the primary thoracentesis site and a 7 cm needle was advised as preferred needle length for the older patients. Factors such as age, sex, presence or absence of COPD, and BMI should be considered when choosing the appropriate needle length.

Accuracy of Needle Thoracostomy Site Selection among US Army Medics.

BACKGROUND: Tension pneumothorax is a prominent cause of potentially survivable death on the battlefield. Field management for suspected tension pneumothorax is immediate needle thoracostomy (NT). Recent data noted higher NT success rates and ease of insertion at the fifth intercostal space, anterior axillary line (5th ICS AAL), leading to an amendment of the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care recommendations on managing suspected tension pneumothorax to include the 5th ICS AAL as a viable alternative site for NT placement. The objective of this study was to assess the overall accuracy, speed, and ease of NT site selection and compare these outcomes between the second intercostal space, midclavicular line (2nd ICS MCL) and 5th ICS AAL among a cohort of Army medics. METHODS: We designed a prospective, observational, comparative study and recruited a convenience sample of US Army medics from a single military installation to localize and mark the anatomic location where they would perform an NT at the 2nd ICS MCL and 5th ICS AAL on 6 live human models. The marked site was compared for accuracy to an optimal site predetermined by investigators. We assessed the primary outcome of accuracy via concordance with the predetermined NT site location at the 2nd ICS MCL and 5th ICS MCL. Secondarily, we compared time to final site marking and the influence of model body mass index (BMI) and gender on accuracy of selection between sites. RESULTS: A total of 15 participants performed 360 NT site selections. We found a significant difference between participants' ability to accurately target the 2nd ICS MCL compared to the 5th ICS AAL (42.2% versus 10% respectively, p is less than 0.001). The overall accuracy rate among all NT site selections was 26.1%. We also found a significant difference in time-to-site identification between the 2nd ICS MCL and 5th ICS AAL in favor of the 2nd ICS MCL (median [IQR] 9 [7.8] seconds versus 12 [12] seconds, p is less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: US Army medics may be more accurate and faster at identifying the 2nd ICS MCL when compared to the 5th ICS AAL. However, overall site selection accuracy is unacceptably low, highlighting an opportunity to enhance training for this procedure.

Risk of Harm in Needle Decompression for Tension Pneumothorax.

INTRODUCTION: Tension pneumothorax (TPX) is the third most common cause of preventable death in trauma. Needle decompression at the fifth intercostal space at anterior axillary line (5th ICS AAL) is recommended by Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) with an 83-mm needle catheter unit (NCU). We sought to determine the risk of cardiac injury at this site. METHODS: Institutional data sets from two trauma centers were queried for 200 patients with CT chest. Inclusion criteria include body mass index of =30 and age 18-40 years. Measurements were taken at 2nd ICS mid clavicular line (MCL), 5th ICS AAL and distance from the skin to pericardium at 5th ICS AAL. Groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: The median age was 27 years with median BMI of 23.8 kg/m2. The cohort was 69.5% male. Mean chest wall thickness at 2nd ICS MCL was 38-mm (interquartile range (IQR) 32-45). At 5th ICS AAL, the median chest wall thickness was 30-mm (IQR 21-40) and the distance from skin to pericardium was 66-mm (IQR 54-79). CONCLUSION: The distance from skin to pericardium for 75% of patients falls within the length of the recommended needle catheter unit (83-mm). The current TCCC recommendation to "hub" the 83mm needle catheter unit has potential risk of cardiac injury.