Factors that influence evidence-informed meso-level regional primary health care planning: a qualitative examination and conceptual framework.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-informed primary health care (PHC) planning in decentralised, meso-level regional organisations has received little research attention. In this paper we examine the factors that influence planning within this environment, and present a conceptual framework. METHODS: We employed mixed methods: case studies of five Australian Primary Health Networks (PHNs), involving 29 primary interviews and secondary analysis of 38 prior interviews; and analysis of planning documents from all 31 PHNs. The analysis was informed by a WHO framework of evidence-informed policy-making, and institutional theory. RESULTS: Influential actors included federal and state/territory governments, Local Health Networks, Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations, local councils, public hospitals, community health services, and providers of allied health, mental health and aged care services. The federal government was most influential, constraining PHNs' planning scope, time and funding. Other external factors included: the health service landscape; local socio-demographic and geographic characteristics; (neoliberal) ideology; interests and politics; national policy settings and reforms; and system reorganisation. Internal factors included: organisational structure; culture, values and ideology; various capacity factors; planning processes; transition history; and experience. The additional regional layer of context adds to the complexity of planning. CONCLUSIONS: Like national health policy-making, meso-level PHC planning occurs in a complex environment, but with additional regional factors and influences. We have developed a conceptual framework of the meso-level PHC planning environment, which can be employed by similar regional organisations to elucidate influential factors, and develop strategies and tools to promote transparent, evidence-informed PHC planning for better health outcomes.

The health Care Management of farmers who use pesticides in Northeast Brazil: use of pesticides and the Care Management.

In Brazil, the health of communities that use pesticides is still neglected due to the lack of greater social understanding of damage to health and an insufficient care network. The objective of the research was to investigate health management practices, from the perspective of the expanded health care network (RAS), focusing on riverside farmers who use pesticides in the municipalities of Petrolina (PE) and Juazeiro (BA) in the Northeast of Brazil. The study aimed to explore these practices from the perspective of the healthcare network (RAS). This is a qualitative research, with a methodological framework based on the Grounded Theory in a constructivist way (CGT). Twenty-six health professionals and RAS managers participated, at the municipal and regional levels in Petrolina (PE) and Juazeiro (BA). Two sample groups were composed for data collection, carried out through semi-structured interviews. The analysis resulted in six categories, which, when integrated, made up the theoretical model "Model of care management for riverside farmers". The RAS must have teams trained in the care of riverside farmers who use pesticides in primary care, and specialized teams in secondary and tertiary care, who are a reference. The theoretical model formulated considers that the RAS, strengthened in terms of diversity of actions and services, will provide better care management for farmers.

Non-hospital healthcare center's preparedness assessment toolbar for providing basic emergency care: a sequential exploratory mixed-method study.

BACKGROUND: Basic emergency management in urban and rural areas is a critical challenge, which can affect the pre-hospital mortality rate. Therefore, Non-hospital Healthcare Center (NHHC) must be prepared to manage such emergency cases that may occur in the geographic area where these centers act. The main aim of the study was to develop and validate an toolbar for NHHCs' preparedness to provide initial emergency care. METHODS: This study was designed based on a sequential exploratory mixed- method in two phases, in each of which there are three steps. In the phase I, the literature systematic review and qualitative methods (Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and Semi-Structured Interviews (SSIs)) were applied to identify the domains and items. In the phase II, content validity, feasibility, and reliability of the toolbar were performed. Content validity was assessed using a modified Kappa coefficient based on clarity and relevance criteria. Feasibility of the toolbar was randomly assessed through its implementation in 10 centers in Tabriz. Reliability was randomly assessed in a pilot on 30 centers. Reliability was assessed by measuring internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater agreement. The main statistical methods for assessing reliability include Cronbach's alpha, Intra-class Correlation Coefficient, and Kendal's Tau-b. All the statistical analyses were performed using Stata 14. RESULTS: In the phase I, primary version of the toolbar containing 134 items related to assessing the preparedness of NHHCs was generated. In the phase II, item reduction was applied and the final version of the toolbar was developed containing 126 items, respectively. These items were classified in 9 domains which include: "Environmental Infrastructures of Centers", "Protocols, Guidelines and Policies", "Medical Supplies and Equipment", "Emergency Medicines", "Human Resources", "Clinical Interventions", "Maintenance of equipment", "Medicine Storage Capability", and "Management Process". The toolbar had acceptable validity and reliability. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided a standard and valid toolbar that can be used to assess the preparedness of NHHCs to deliver initial emergency care.

How insights from the field of information behavior can enrich understanding of knowledge mobilization.

PURPOSE: The authors review the literature on information behavior, an autonomous body of work developed mainly in library studies and compare it with work on knowledge mobilization. The aim is to explore how information behavior can contribute to understanding knowledge mobilization in healthcare management. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors conducted a narrative review using an exploratory, nonkeyword "double-sided systematic snowball" method. This is especially useful in the situation when the two traditions targeted are broad and relies on distinct vocabulary. FINDINGS: The authors find that the two bodies of work have followed similar trajectories and arrived at similar conclusions, with a linear view supplemented first by a social approach and then by a sensitivity to practice. Lessons from the field of information behavior can be used to avoid duplication of effort, repeating the same errors and reinventing the wheel among knowledge translation scholars. This includes, for example, focusing on sources of information or ignoring the mundane activities in which managers and policymakers are involved. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The study is the first known attempt to build bridges between the field of information behavior and the study of knowledge mobilization. The study, moreover, foregrounds the need to address knowledge mobilization in context-sensitive and social rather than technical terms, focusing on the mundane work performed by a variety of human and nonhuman agents.

Association between public health nurses' involvement in local healthcare planning and the corresponding off-the-job training.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the association between receiving off-the-job training and the involvement of public health nurses in local healthcare planning. DESIGN: A nationwide, cross-sectional study design. METHODS: We sent self-report questionnaires to 2,185 public health nurses with experience in developing local healthcare plans in Japan since 2013 and collected information related to three main categories: demographic data, involvement in local healthcare planning and strategies for healthcare planning. RESULTS: We received 1,281 responses (return rate of 58.6%), of which 231 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Thus, we analysed 1,050 valid responses. Among the 1,050 respondents, 496 (47.2%) had received off-the-job training in healthcare planning. A subsequent logistic regression analysis revealed that the following factors were associated with this achievement: holding a managerial position, receiving healthcare planning education at the undergraduate level, having mentors regarding the promotion of it, partially conducting cross-sectional coordination and conducting groupwork with community-dwelling residents.

Looking beyond parity: Gender wage gaps and the leadership labyrinth in the Canadian healthcare management workforce.

It is important for health organizations to monitor progress toward gender equity and inclusion goals among health human resources. Within the Canadian healthcare management workforce, however, recent investigations are lacking. This study examines gender differences in composition and compensation among health leadership in Canada using national census data. Findings show that although women represent over half (57%) of senior managers in health and social services, the pipeline from middle management (72%) suggests persistent career barriers disproportionately affect women. Women health and social care managers' earnings averaged $0.83-.89 for every dollar that a man earned. The gender wage gap remained statistically significant, with women health managers earning 12-20% less than men, after adjusting for age, education and other characteristics. Dynamic decomposition analyses highlighted that most of the gender wage gap could not be explained within the available data-a finding attributable, at least in part, to (unmeasured and unmeasurable) gender discrimination.

Influence of Selected Indicators of Healthcare System Functioning Evaluation on the Health Result.

BACKGROUND: According to the World Health Organization's statistics, 7 of the 10 main causes of death in 2019 were noncommunicable diseases. Health indicators are measures used to evaluate public health system effectiveness and functioning. Monitoring mortality rates from leading causes, life expectancy and other health indicators is essential to address their causes and adapt health systems to react adequately. The aim of this study is to present the dependencies of selected health care indicators and health outcomes. METHODS: Based on the literature review conducted, selected health indicators, along with healthcare system data, were analyzed using Pearson's r correlation. The analyses included data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) presented in statistics and the Health at a Glance 2021 report and data collected as part of the preparation of the Financing Global Health 2020 report by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. RESULTS: Health system resources are linked to health outcomes. The number of medical consultations, the number of nurses per patient or the level of financing of services under general health insurance are related to life expectancy and deaths due to causes that could have been avoided or treated. CONCLUSIONS: Life expectancy is positively correlated with access to general health insurance and public expenditure on healthcare. There is a need for all countries to provide their citizens with broad access to healthcare services.

[Rebuilding the healthcare system: governance, organization and digitalization. SESPAS Report 2022]. / Reconstrucción del sistema sanitario: gobernanza, organización y digitalización. Informe SESPAS 2022.

Reflection on three major levers for rebuilding the healthcare system: governance, integration of health and social care and digitalization. Spain has worrying levels of quality of democracy and public confidence in its politicians, and major changes are required in public administration to achieve a better state. Healthcare suffers from a deficient institutional architecture that prevents adequate macrogovernance. There is also a lack of autonomy in the management of public health centers, which hinders competition by comparison, care integration and coordination within and between levels of care. The pandemic has highlighted the value of professionalism and has shown that agile healthcare management is possible, but the challenge is to maintain this flexibility outside state of alarm. Care integration is more necessary as the population ages (albeit healthily), and per capita financing is a powerful tool to achieve it. Digitization concerns practically all areas of healthcare and population health, and will bring with it far-reaching organizational changes, requiring new methods of evaluation that differ according to the degree of intrusiveness in individual health. Telemedicine, sponsored during the pandemic with a view to permanence, induces changes in labor relations, among others. It is necessary to measure the value of digital tools and technologies. Spain has a unique opportunity for its digital transformation, thanks to European funds.

Addressing stimulant use disorder through state opioid response grants from the substance abuse and mental health services administration: Missouri's initial approach.

Background: The alarming growth of stimulant-involved deaths underscores the urgent need for states to expand existing opioid-specific approaches to intentionally reach and serve people who use stimulants. Recent permission from federal agencies has allowed states to spend grant funding that was previously restricted to opioid-related activities on approaches addressing stimulant use.Objectives: This manuscript describes the rationale, methods, and initial results supporting the implementation of Missouri's recent stimulant-focused efforts - including previously-prohibited activities such as Contingency Management and fentanyl test strip distribution.Methods: Missouri's State Opioid Response team facilitated the design and implementation of Contingency Management pilot programming abiding by federal spending limits of no more than $75 of incentives per client, mass distribution of fentanyl test strips, and publicly accessible harm reduction trainings and materials specific to stimulant use. Data sources used for initial evaluations included state-level treatment claims, fentanyl test strip distribution counts by type and region of organizations receiving them, and qualitative feedback from stakeholders.Results: Six substance use treatment agencies developed Contingency Management programs, serving 29 individuals in the first nine months. Over 20,000 fentanyl test strips were distributed using a prioritization system designed to reach those most likely to benefit from their use.Conclusions: Recent federally funded efforts to better address stimulant use in Missouri have increased access to evidence-based treatment and harm reduction resources. Lessons learned from early implementation, especially those regarding time allowed for program development and how best to ensure equitable resource distribution, will inform future stimulant-focused program efforts.

The impact of healthcare executive seniority on implementation of innovative methods of diagnosis and prevention.

Innovative methods of diagnosis and prevention play a key role in the survival of healthcare systems as well as the wellbeing of patients. Effective healthcare management is a critical factor in implementing hospital innovation. Healthcare executive (HE) personal and job characteristics such as age and seniority have been found to affect innovative decision-making. However, no study has yet investigated age and seniority effects on the propensity to implement innovation in health prevention strategies. This study fills the literature gap by providing evidence for the effect of HE age and seniority on the implementation of innovative methods for diagnosis and prevention. Predicated on 57 in-depth interviews with HEs, we employ mixed methods research, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis. Structural Equation Modeling was used to test the model's goodness-of-fit. Results show that while HE age and number of years in the organization positively affect job tenure, job tenure, in turn, negatively affects willingness to implement innovative methods of diagnosis and prevention in hospitals. This study extends the Upper-Echelon Theory to health workforce management. Practical implications are discussed.

Building a practice-based research network for healthcare integration: a protocol paper for a mixed-method project.

INTRODUCTION: Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are sustained collaborations between healthcare professionals, researchers and members of the community that develop, conduct and report on research relevant to local needs. While PBRNs have traditionally been focused towards primary care practices and their patients, there has been increasing interest in how they may help facilitate healthcare integration. Yet, little is known on the ways in which PBRNs can best integrate with the broader healthcare system, in particular Advanced Health Research and Translation Centres. The overall project aim is to build a sustainable collaboration between a PBRN and an Advanced Health Research and Translation Centre to generate a research platform suitable for planning, undertaking and translating research to improve care across the healthcare continuum. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use a developmental evaluation design. Our iterative approach will be informed by a programme logic model and consists of: preparation work (pre-implementation assessment, literature review, community and stakeholder engagement), adaptation and building for a sustainable collaboration (strategy for recruitment and sustainment of members) and planning for network action (designing and implementing priority initiatives, monitoring and follow-up). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project was approved by the Monash Health ethics committee (ERM Reference Number: 76281; Monash Health Ref: RES-21-0000-392L) and the Monash University Human Research ethics committee (Reference Number: 29786). Dissemination will take place via various channels, including relevant national and international committees and conferences, peer-reviewed journals and social media. Continuous dissemination to and communication with all participants in this project as well as other relevant stakeholders will help strengthen and sustain the network.

Healthcare performance management using integrated FUCOM-MARCOS approach: The case of India.

AIMS: The goal of this research is to propose a simpler and more efficient model for evaluating healthcare establishments (HCEs). With this motivation, this study aims to discover key performance indicators (KPIs) that affect HCE performance, present a ranking model for KPIs in Indian HCEs, and evaluate Indian HCEs using the identified and prioritised KPIs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Through extensive literature review and expert opinions, this research identifies the various KPIs in HCEs, classifies them into six main categories, and prioritises them using the full consistency method (FUCOM). Further, well-known HCEs across northern India were evaluated and ranked using Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution. RESULTS: The 'technology adoption related indicators' is found as the most important main KPIs, whereas 'adequate number of hospital beds and bathrooms (IE5)' as the most dominating sub-category KPIs. Also, amongst the 20 evaluated Indian HCEs 'healthcare establishment-1 (HCE1)' was found to be the best performing HCE while 'healthcare establishment-12 (HCE12)' was found to be the worst-performing HCE. The stability and consistency of the results are ascertained by performing sensitivity analysis and comparing the results with other existing methodologies. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study are quite important for HCEs management to fully comprehend the key areas to improve upon so that managers can improve medical standards in a targeted manner. The developed prioritisation model and methodology shown in this paper will help and motivate managers and intellectuals of HCEs to evaluate and improve the HCE's performance.

Fulfilling the Promise of Artificial Intelligence in the Health Sector: Let's Get Real.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to showcase the potential and key concerns and risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in the health sector, illustrating its application with current examples, and to provide policy guidance for the development, assessment, and adoption of AI technologies to advance policy objectives. METHODS: Nonsystematic scan and analysis of peer-reviewed and gray literature on AI in the health sector, focusing on key insights for policy and governance. RESULTS: The application of AI in the health sector is currently in the early stages. Most applications have not been scaled beyond the research setting. The use in real-world clinical settings is especially nascent, with more evidence in public health, biomedical research, and "back office" administration. Deploying AI in the health sector carries risks and hazards that must be managed proactively by policy makers. For AI to produce positive health and policy outcomes, 5 key areas for policy are proposed, including health data governance, operationalizing AI principles, flexible regulation, skills among health workers and patients, and strategic public investment. CONCLUSIONS: AI is not a panacea, but a tool to address specific problems. Its successful development and adoption require data governance that ensures high-quality data are available and secure; relevant actors can access technical infrastructure and resources; regulatory frameworks promote trustworthy AI products; and health workers and patients have the information and skills to use AI products and services safely, effectively, and efficiently. All of this requires considerable investment and international collaboration.

Lean Management Systems in Health Care: A Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many health care organizations now employ Lean tools to improve value in health care, yet reports of their effectiveness vary. This variation may be explained by the context in which Lean is implemented, whether as a tool or as a management system. This article reports on a structured literature review conducted to understand the evidence base for the impact of Lean Management System implementation in health care. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Scopus, Emerald, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Business Source Complete databases was conducted in November 2017 and repeated in July 2020 to assess the evidence for the impact of Lean Management Systems in health care from 2000 to July 2020. Articles were included if they (1) reported on a Lean Management System or (2) reported on Lean Management System components as described by Mann 1 (ie, leader standard work, visual controls, daily accountability process, and discipline). RESULTS: A total of 52 articles met the inclusion criteria. Although all articles described some combination of leader standard work, visual management, and daily accountability as part of their Lean Management System, only a handful described use of all 3 components together. Only one explicitly mentioned the fourth component, discipline, required to consistently apply the first 3. The majority reported on single-unit or department implementations and most described daily huddles at the unit level that included review of key performance indicators, identification of improvement opportunities, and problem solving. The role of the leader in a Lean Management System was described a coach and a mentor. Barriers to adoption such as insufficient training and increased workload for nurses were noted along with the importance of relevance to the local context for unit teams to find value in huddle boards and huddles. As yet, evidence of Lean Management System effectiveness in driving health care improvement is absent due to weak study designs and lack of statistical rigor. CONCLUSION: Well-designed research on Lean Management Systems in health care is lacking. Despite increasing adoption of Lean Management Systems over the past 10 years and anecdotal reports of its effectiveness, very few articles provide quantitative data. Those that do report unit-level implementation only, little use of a comprehensive package of Lean Management Systems elements, and weaker study designs and statistical methods. More rigorous study designs and robust statistical analysis are needed to evaluate effectiveness of Lean Management Systems in health care. This represents a rich area for future health care management research.

Digitally enabled supply chain as a strategic asset for the COVID-19 response in Alberta.

This provincial case study, one of seven conducted as part of a national research program on healthcare supply chain management during COVID-19, focuses on Alberta. With a history of emergency preparedness, Alberta's unique context, one that includes having an already established, centralized, and digital healthcare supply chain strategy, sets this case apart from the others in terms of pandemic responses. A key challenge navigated by Alberta was the inadequacies of traditional sourcing and procurement approaches to meet surges in product demand, which was overcome by the implementation of unique procurement strategies. Opportunities for Alberta included the integration of supply chain teams into senior leadership structures, which enabled access to data to inform public health decision-making. This case demonstrated how Alberta's healthcare supply chain assets-its supply chain infrastructure, data, and leadership expertise, especially-contributed to resilient supply chain capacity across the province.

Healthcare Management, avoidable mortality, telemedicine to improve health of the diabetic population.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimated that in 2021 9.2% of adults (536.6 million, between 20 and 79 years of age) are diabetic and 32.6% under 60 years (6.7 million) die because of diabetes. This disease is set to become the leading cause of disability and mortality by 2030. In Italy, the prevalence of Diabetes is about 5%; in the pre-pandemic period, from 2010 to 2019, diabetes was responsible for 3% of deaths recorded, while during the pandemic in 2020, these deaths increased to about 4%. The present work aimed to measure the outcomes obtained from the ICPs (integrated care pathways) implemented by a Health Local Authority according to the model of the Lazio region and its impact on avoidable mortality, i.e., those deaths potentially avoidable with primary prevention interventions, early diagnosis and targeted therapies, adequate hygienic conditions and proper health care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 1675 patients enrolled in the diagnostic treatment pathway were analyzed, 471 with type 1 diabetes and the remainder with type 2 (mean age 17.5 and 69, respectively). 987 patients with type 2 diabetes also had comorbidities: in 43% obesity, 56% dyslipidemia, 61% hypertension, 29% COPD. In 54% they had at least 2 comorbidities. All patients enrolled in the ICPs were equipped with a glucometer and an app capable of recording results on capillary blood, 269 with type 1 diabetes were equipped with continuous and 198 insulin pump measurement devices. All enrolled patients recorded at least one daily blood glucose reading, one weekly weight reading, and recorded steps taken daily. They also underwent glycated hemoglobin monitoring, periodic visits and scheduled instrumental checks. A total of 5500 parameters were measured for patients with type 2 diabetes and 2345 for patients with type 1 diabetes. RESULTS: Analysis of medical records revealed that 93% of patients with type 1 diabetes were found to be adherent to the treatment pathway, adherence of patients with type 2 diabetes was recorded in 87% of enrolled cases. The analysis of accesses to the Emergency Department for decompensated diabetes saw only 21% of patients enrolled in the ICPs, but recording poor compliance. The mortality in enrolled patients was 1.9% compared with 4.3 percent in patients not enrolled in ICPs, and patients amputated for diabetic foot resulted in 82% of patients not enrolled in ICPs. Finally, it is noted that patients also enrolled in the telerehabilitation pathway or home care rehabilitation (28%), with the same conditions of severity of neuropathic and vasculopathic picture presented a reduction of 18% in leg or lower limb amputation compared to patients not enrolled or not adhering to ICPs, a reduction of 27% in metatarsal amputation and 34% in toes amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Telemonitoring of diabetic patients allows for greater patient empowerment with increased adherence, as well as a reduction in Emergency Department and inpatient admissions, thus resulting in ICPs being a tool for both standardization of quality of care and standardization of the average cost of the chronic patient with diabetic disease. Likewise, telerehabilitation can reduce the incidence of amputations from diabetic foot disease if associated with adherence to the proposed pathway with ICPs.

A text mining study of topics and trends in health care management journals: 1998-2018.

BACKGROUND: Advances in natural language processing and text mining provide a powerful approach to understanding trending themes in the health care management literature. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to introduce machine learning, particularly text mining and natural language processing, as a viable approach to summarizing a subset of health care management research. The secondary aim of the study was to display the major foci of health care management research and to summarize the literature's evolution trends over a 20-year period. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Article abstracts (N = 2,813), from six health care management journals published from 1998 through 2018 were evaluated through latent semantic analysis, topic analysis, and multiple correspondence analysis. RESULTS: Using latent semantic analysis and topic analysis on 2,813 abstracts revealed eight distinct topics. Of the eight, three leadership and transformation, workforce well-being, and delivery of care issues were up-trending, whereas organizational performance, patient-centeredness, technology and innovation, and managerial issues and gender concerns exhibited downward trending. Finance exhibited peaks and troughs throughout the study period. Four journals, Frontiers of Health Services Management, Journal of Healthcare Management, Health Care Management Review, and Advances in Health Care Management, exhibited strong associations with finance, organizational performance, technology and innovation, managerial issues and gender concerns, and workforce well-being. The Journal of Health Management and the Journal of Health Organization and Management were more distant from the other journals and topics, except for delivery of care, and leadership and transformation. CONCLUSION: There was a close association of journals and research topics, and research topics evolved with changes in the health care environment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: As scholars develop research agendas, focus should be on topics important to health care management practitioners for better informed decision-making.

The risks and benefits of providing HIV services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused widespread disruptions including to health services. In the early response to the pandemic many countries restricted population movements and some health services were suspended or limited. In late 2020 and early 2021 some countries re-imposed restrictions. Health authorities need to balance the potential harms of additional SARS-CoV-2 transmission due to contacts associated with health services against the benefits of those services, including fewer new HIV infections and deaths. This paper examines these trade-offs for select HIV services. METHODS: We used four HIV simulation models (Goals, HIV Synthesis, Optima HIV and EMOD) to estimate the benefits of continuing HIV services in terms of fewer new HIV infections and deaths. We used three COVID-19 transmission models (Covasim, Cooper/Smith and a simple contact model) to estimate the additional deaths due to SARS-CoV-2 transmission among health workers and clients. We examined four HIV services: voluntary medical male circumcision, HIV diagnostic testing, viral load testing and programs to prevent mother-to-child transmission. We compared COVID-19 deaths in 2020 and 2021 with HIV deaths occurring now and over the next 50 years discounted to present value. The models were applied to countries with a range of HIV and COVID-19 epidemics. RESULTS: Maintaining these HIV services could lead to additional COVID-19 deaths of 0.002 to 0.15 per 10,000 clients. HIV-related deaths averted are estimated to be much larger, 19-146 discounted deaths per 10,000 clients. DISCUSSION: While there is some additional short-term risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission associated with providing HIV services, the risk of additional COVID-19 deaths is at least 100 times less than the HIV deaths averted by those services. Ministries of Health need to take into account many factors in deciding when and how to offer essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. This work shows that the benefits of continuing key HIV services are far larger than the risks of additional SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

The older prisoner health and social care assessment and plan (OHSCAP) versus treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Older people are the fastest-growing demographic group among prisoners in England and Wales and they have complex health and social care needs. Their care is frequently ad hoc and uncoordinated. No previous research has explored how to identify and appropriately address the needs of older adults in prison. We hypothesised that the Older prisoner Health and Social Care Assessment and Plan (OHSCAP) would significantly increase the proportion of met health and social care needs 3 months after prison entry, compared to treatment as usual (TAU). METHODS: The study was a parallel randomised controlled trial (RCT) recruiting male prisoners aged 50 and over from 10 prisons in northern England. Participants received the OHSCAP or TAU. A clinical trials unit used minimisation with a random element as the allocation procedure. Data analysis was conducted blind to allocation status. The intervention group had their needs assessed using the OHSCAP tool and care plans were devised; processes that lasted approximately 30 min in total per prisoner. TAU included the standard prison health assessment and care. The intention to treat principle was followed. The trial was registered with the UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio (ISRCTN ID: 11841493) and was closed on 30 November 2016. RESULTS: Data were collected between 28 January 2014 and 06 April 2016. Two hundred and forty nine older prisoners were assigned TAU of which 32 transferred prison; 12 were released; 2 withdrew and 1 was deemed unsafe to interview. Two hundred and fifty three 3 prisoners were assigned the OHSCAP of which 33 transferred prison; 11 were released; 6 withdrew and 1 was deemed unsafe to interview. Consequently, data from 202 participants were analysed in each of the two groups. There were no significant differences in the number of unmet needs as measured by the Camberwell Assessment of Needs - Forensic Short Version (CANFOR-S). The mean number of unmet needs for the OHSCAP group at follow-up was 2.03 (SD = 2.07) and 2.06 (SD = 2.11) for the TAU group (mean difference = 0.088; 95% CI - 0.276 to 0.449, p = 0.621). No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The OHSCAP was fundamentally not implemented as planned, partly due to the national prison staffing crisis that ensued during the study period. Therefore, those receiving the OHSCAP did not experience improved outcomes compared to those who received TAU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN11841493 , 25/10/2012.