Preapproval Promises to Voluntarily Withdraw FDA-Approved Drugs.

This Viewpoint provides recommendations for improvements to strengthen legal obligations and decrease ambiguity for the US Food and Drug Administration regarding their reliance on voluntary preapproval withdrawal pledges.

The FDA Struggle to Withdraw Makena: Problems With the Accelerated Approval Process.

This Viewpoint discusses the controversy surrounding the FDA's efforts to withdraw Makena from the market and the broader implications for the accelerated approval pathway.

Review of drug recalls and quality of pharmaceutical products in Nepal.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pattern of substandard and falsified pharmaceutical products recall in Nepal. SETTING: We analysed drug recall notices issued by the Department of Drug Administration (DDA), Nepal, and systematically reviewed peer-reviewed research articles during January 2010 to December 2020. PARTICIPANTS: This study did not include human participants. However, data were collected from 72 drug recall notices issued by DDA and four research papers. RESULTS: A total of 346 pharmaceutical products were recalled during the reported period. The number of recalled pharmaceutical products has increased significantly over the past decade in Nepal. The most frequently recalled drugs were antimicrobials followed by gastrointestinal medicines, vitamins and supplements and pain and palliative medicines among others. Number of imported recalled drugs were slightly higher (42.2%) than domestic recalled drugs (40.7%). Sixty-two percentage of recalled drugs were substandard, 11% were falsified and remaining 27% were not registered at the DDA. Similarly, higher number of modern drugs (62%) were recalled than traditional ones (35%). Hand sanitisers used to minimise COVID-19 transmission contributed significantly to the list of recalled pharmaceutical products in 2020. Most of these sanitisers contained significant amounts of methanol (as high as 75% v/v) instead of appropriate amount of ethyl or isopropyl alcohol. The peer-reviewed research papers reported issues with labelling, unregistered drugs and drugs failed in several laboratory testing. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that number of recalls of substandard and falsified drugs are increasing in Nepal. Since the recall data in this paper did not include number of samples tested and location of samples collected, more studies to understand the prevalence of substandard and falsified drugs in Nepal is recommended.

Categorization and comparisons of drug recalls for manufacturers and compounders.

BACKGROUND: Ensuring the quality and safety of the pharmaceutical supply chain is a key policy focus vital to protecting the public from harmful or potentially harmful medications. Although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports the number of recalled products per fiscal year and categorizes recalls based on product type and recall classification, these reports do not distinguish between manufactured and compounded products. OBJECTIVES: This research aims to categorize drug recalls based on the reason for recall and then to compare this reason between manufacturers and compounders. METHODS: All publicly available drug recall data were downloaded from the FDA Data Dashboard website on January 24, 2021. Two reviewers independently categorized the recalling firm, distribution pattern, and reason for recall, and a third reviewer resolved all conflicts. Descriptive statistics were reported for recall event classification, distribution, and recall reason for the full sample. Chi-square test of independence was used to assess categorical variables by facility type (manufacturer or compounder) as well as by event classification (class I, II, or III). A subgroup analysis was performed focusing on class I level recalls only, representing the most serious recall, and similar statistical procedures were performed. RESULTS: From June 8, 2012, to January 24, 2021, there were 12,343 drug products recalled; 6771 were from a manufacturer, and 5572 were from a compounder. Most recalls from both compounders and manufacturers were class II recalls with products being distributed to multiple states. Sterility assurance was the predominant reason for recall among compounders, whereas product quality was the most frequent recall reason for manufacturers. There were statistically significant differences in class I recalls between compounders and manufacturers and recall reason compared across recall classification. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in the reason for a drug to be recalled, the distribution level, and the product class for manufactured and compounded products.

The plague of unexpected drug recalls and the pandemic of falsified medications in cardiovascular medicine as a threat to patient safety and global public health: A brief review.

Valsartan, losartan, and irbesartan, are widely used in the treatment strategies of cardiovascular medicine diseases, including hypertension and heart failure. Recently, many formulations for the aforementioned diseases contained active pharmaceutical ingredients and had been abruptly recalled from the market due to safety concerns mainly associated with unwanted impurities - nitrosamines, which are highly carcinogenic substances accidentally produced during manufacturing. Along with cardiovascular medications, formulations containing ranitidine were also recalled from the market. This poses a particular threat to public health due to the non-prescription status of these drugs. Regulatory authorities, including the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency among others, have taken action to minimize patient risk and improve the manufacturing quality as well as re-checking current guidelines and recommendations. While these steps are necessary to avoid further recalls, authorities should remember the growing concerns of patients regarding the safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy. Apart from the genuine manufacturing mistakes mentioned above, falsified and counterfeit medications should be at the heart of global attention. The lack of a well-accepted definition of falsified/counterfeit medications has impeded political and scientific efforts to mitigate risk of this phenomenon. Falsified Medicines Directive should be considered the most pivotal legislation recently enacted to harmonize international cooperation. In summary, one should remember that only international and direct collaboration between patients, stakeholders, and authorities be considered a remedy for a pandemic of falsified medicines and plague of unexpected recalls due to safety concerns.

The Identification of Quality Risk Factors for Non-biological Complex Drugs and Epilepsy Drugs Using Statistical Analysis of Formulation-Based Recalls in the USA.

Pharmaceutical companies use the quality by design (QbD) approach to build high-quality drug products. A thorough understanding of risk factors is required to successfully employ QbD. In order to better understand risk factors that potentially impact drug product quality and inform future QbD approaches, we hypothesized root causes of drug product recalls based on publicly available data and a retroactive analysis of drug products recalled by the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) from 2012 to 2018. We focused on two categories of drug products that pose unique regulatory challenges and an increased risk of shortage that could hinder the adequate supply of quality medicine to the patient. Knowing the significant risk factors from previous drug product recalls can help inform QbD and avoid future recalls. Quality recall reasons were studied individually to find risk factors associated with each recall category. Logistical regression statistical tests were done in R using a significance level of 0.05 to find correlations between a recalled product and its manufacturing information such as excipients and manufacturing steps. The results showed significant positive and negative correlations, such as products containing magnesium stearate are more likely to be recalled for impurities and degradation. This information could be used in the future to inform the design and manufacturing of drug products, ensuring consumers receive high-quality products with a low risk of recall.

Extent of a valsartan drug shortage and its effect on antihypertensive drug use in the Canadian population: a national cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Drug shortages represent a growing global problem, with potentially serious consequences to patients and the health care system. Our study investigates the impacts of a major recall and shortage of valsartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), in July 2018 in Canada. METHODS: We conducted a time-series analysis of antihypertensive drugs dispensed in Canada between 2015 and 2019 using commercially available retail prescription data. Using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modelling, we evaluated the change in valsartan use after the recall. We also measured the overall use of ARBs, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and other antihypertensive drug classes for the same period. RESULTS: After the recall in July 2018, valsartan use decreased 57.8%, from 362 231 prescriptions dispensed in June 2018 to 152 892 in September 2018 (difference = 209 339, p < 0.0001). Overall use of the ARB drug class decreased 2.0%, from 1 577 509 prescriptions dispensed in June 2018 to 1 545 591 in September 2018 (difference = 31 918, p = 0.0003), but use of non-valsartan ARBs increased 14.6%, from 1 215 278 to 1 392 699 prescriptions dispensed (difference = 177 421, p < 0.0001) in the same time frame. Although use of ACE inhibitors initially declined, this reduction was not sustained. The valsartan recall was not associated with a significant impact on use of other antihypertensive drug classes. INTERPRETATION: Our findings illustrate the impact of a major drug shortage, with the immediate and substantial reduction of valsartan dispensed and cascading effects on other ARBs, though future research is warranted to understand the consequences of such extensive shortages on clinical outcomes and health system costs. Improved policy strategies are needed to address the underlying causes of drug shortages and to mitigate their effects.

The 'burn' of ranitidine recall: current insights and mitigation strategies.

Ranitidine was one of the most commonly used medications for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. On 1 April 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration requested all manufacturers to immediately withdraw ranitidine from the market because of concern of higher than acceptable levels of N-nitrosodimethylamine, a potential carcinogen. Herein, we highlight the reason for this recall, along with the effects of this recall on both the patients and healthcare practitioners, and offer insights on management strategies.

Critical Analysis of Drug Product Recalls due to Nitrosamine Impurities.

A product recall is the outcome of a careful pharmacovigilance; and it is an integral part of drug regulation. Among various reasons for product recall, the detection of unacceptable levels of carcinogenic impurities is one of the most serious concerns. The genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of N-nitrosamines raises a serious safety concern, and in September 2020, the FDA issued guidance for the pharmaceutical industry regarding the control of nitrosamines in drug products. The FDA database shows that >1400 product lots have been recalled from the market due to the presence of carcinogenic N-nitrosamine impurities at levels beyond the acceptable intake limit of 26.5 ng/day. The drugs that were present in recalled products include valsartan, irbesartan, losartan, metformin, ranitidine, and nizatidine. This perspective provides a critical account of these product recalls with an emphasis on the source and mechanism for the formation of N-nitrosamines in these products.

Effects of Interactivity on Recall of Health Information: Experimental Study.

BACKGROUND: Information provided in an interactive way is believed to be engaging because users can actively explore the information. Yet empirical findings often contradict this assumption. Consequently, there is still little known about whether and how interactivity affects communication outcomes such as recall. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate mechanisms through which interactivity affects recall of online health information. We tested whether and how cognitive involvement, perceived active control, and cognitive load mediate the effects of interactivity on recall. In addition, we examined need for cognition and health literacy as potential moderators of the mediation effects. Given the increasing popularity of dietary supplement use, our health website focused on this topic. METHODS: In an online between-subjects experiment (n=983), participants were randomly assigned to control condition (no interactive features), moderate interactivity (dropdown menus), and high interactivity (dropdown menus and responsive infographics). Two weeks before the experiment, background characteristics and moderating variables were measured. During website visit, data on users' online behavior were collected. Recall was measured postexposure. RESULTS: Participants recalled significantly less information in the moderate (mean 3.48 [SD 2.71]) and high (mean 3.52 [SD 2.64]) interactivity conditions compared with the control condition (mean 5.63 [SD 2.18]). In the mediation analysis, we found direct, negative effects of moderate (b=-2.25, 95% CI -2.59 to -1.90) and high (b=-2.16, 95% CI -2.51 to -1.81) levels of interactivity on recall as well. In the relationship between interactivity and recall, cognitive involvement had a partial negative mediation effect (moderate interactivity: b=-.20; 95% CI -0.31 to -0.10; high interactivity: b=-.21, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.10) and perceived active control had a partial positive mediation effect (moderate interactivity: b=.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.40; high interactivity: b=.27, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Interactivity decreased recall. In addition, through interactivity participants were less involved with the content of the information, yet they felt they had more control over the information. These effects were stronger in the high need for cognition and high health literate groups compared with their counterparts.

An Analytic Investigation of the Drug Formulation-Based Recalls in the USA: See More Beyond the Literal.

High numbers of drug recalls persist despite the tremendous time and effort invested by pharmaceutical organizations and regulatory bodies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to ensure the quality of safe and effective medicines for the patient. It is imperative to better understand the underlying risk factors of drug formulation-based recalls to best protect the patient from poor quality drugs. Increased knowledge of underlying factors of formulation risk can also help inform the future design and development of drugs. In this study, we used a text mining technique with Python to parse the data and examine drug recalls from the aspect of administration route, dosage form, release mechanism, market type, pharmacologic class, and excipients. Observational analysis of the recalls revealed both high- and low-risk factors for the formulation-based recalls. Higher risk, or an increased probability of a formulation-based recall, was associated with factors such as extended release mechanism, capsule dosage form, oral route of administration, and an increased number of excipients, while lower risk of formulation-based recalls was associated with other factors including the new drug application market type, immediate release mechanism, and solution dosage form. In addition, the factors did not work independently, and we observed interactions among variables. For example, the release mechanism modified the effect of market type, administration route, and dosage form. This study will help inform the future design of quality drug products by pharmaceutical organizations and assist risk-based oversight by regulatory organizations, such as FDA, to ensure patient safety.

Nitrosamine Impurities in Angiotensin Receptor Blockers.

Nitrosamines are known carcinogens which have been recently discovered in several angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). This led to the recall of valsartan in the United States in 2018, and afterward, the recall of other ARBs as well as unrelated medications (e.g., ranitidine). The presence of nitrosamine in ARBs was likely a result of changes in the manufacturing process, although nitrosamine contamination is believed to occur by different mechanisms with other medications. The United States Food and Drug Administration has since taken steps to identify products affected by nitrosamine contamination and mitigate this concern going forward. Despite the contamination of some drug products, studies estimate that the overall risk to patients is low enough to not necessitate changes in prescribing patterns at this time.

Reflections of the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Recall by the FDA and Repercussions on Healthcare.

PURPOSE: Beginning in July of 2018, the FDA issued a voluntary recall regarding the presence of a contaminant found in the manufacturing of valsartan. What would ensue has become a largely unprecedented sequence of alarming events since the FDA began reporting public recalls, withdrawals and safety alerts on their website in 2016. Since then, the United States has been significantly impacted by drug recalls affecting angiotensin receptor blockers. This report arms clinicians with additional guidance and provides a framework for responding appropriately to future similar incidents and includes an overview of the angiotensin receptor blockers, and their effects and safety profiles. METHODS: This report includes a review of data from all pertinent clinical and scientific sources including information from the FDA's inspection documents and recall website. Additional information is provided on the specific bottles including all lot numbers, expiration dates, etc. RESULTS: The recalls/withdrawals are attributable to the presence of cancer-causing contaminants identified during the manufacturing process from drug manufacturers abroad. The root causes behind the recalls and subsequent shortage appear multifactorial, and stem to a certain extent from the outsourcing of medication manufacturing overseas and lack of quality checks and appropriate oversight. CONCLUSIONS: This inherent issue is not likely to resolve soon and has eroded the public trust of/in the healthcare system and the pharmaceutical industry. Patients and healthcare providers are significantly affected and should have a full understanding of the matter in order to guide appropriate response and actions.