Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 565
Filtrar
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 52, 2023 Jan 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36653840

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In a healthcare system based on managed competition, it is important that health insurers are able to channel enrollees to preferred providers. This results in incentives for healthcare providers to improve the quality and reduce the price of care. One of the instruments to guide enrollees to preferred providers is by providing healthcare advice. In order to use healthcare advice as an effective instrument, it is important that enrollees accept the health insurer as a healthcare advisor. As trust in health insurers is not high, this may be an obstacle for enrollees to be receptive to the health insurer's advice. This study aims to investigate the association between trust in the health insurer and the willingness to receive healthcare advice from the health insurer in the Netherlands. In terms of receiving healthcare advice, we examine both enrollees' willingness to approach the health insurer themselves and their willingness to be approached by the health insurer. METHODS: In February 2021, a questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of the Dutch population. The questionnaire was completed by 885 respondents (response rate 59%). Respondents were asked about their willingness to receive healthcare advice, and trust in the health insurer was measured using a validated multiple item scale. Logistic regression models were conducted to analyse the results. RESULTS: Enrollees with more trust in the health insurer were more willing to approach their health insurer for healthcare advice (OR = 1.07, p = 0.00). In addition, a higher level of trust in the health insurer is significantly associated with the odds that enrollees would like it/really appreciate it if their health insurer actively approached them with healthcare advice (OR = 1.07, p = 0.00). The role of trust in the willingness to receive healthcare advice is not proven to differ between groups with regard to educational levels, health status or age. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that trust plays a role in the willingness to receive healthcare advice from the health insurer. The association between the two emphasizes the importance to increase enrollees' trust in the health insurer. As a result, health insurers may be better able to fulfil their role as healthcare advisor.


Assuntos
Seguro Saúde , Confiança , Humanos , Seguradoras , Atenção à Saúde , Competição em Planos de Saúde
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 990, 2022 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35922844

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since 2006, business principles have been introduced to foster efficient healthcare by way of managed competition. Managed competition is expressed by a contract between a health insurer and a physiotherapy primary healthcare organisation (PTPHO). In such a managed environment, PTPHOs have to attain treatment service quality and financial PTPHO-centred outcomes Research shows that business model designs may enhance organisation-centred outcomes. A business model is a design (efficiency or novelty) of how a firm transacts with customers, partners, and vendors; how it connects with markets. However, research on managed competition contract and business model designs, in relation to PTPHO-centred outcomes is new to the healthcare literature. PTPHOs may not know how business model designs enhance outcomes. This study aims to delineate the relations between business model efficiency and novelty, and PTPHO-centred outcomes, while accounting for managed competition contract in Dutch healthcare. METHODS: A quantitative cross-sectional design was adopted. Using a questionnaire, the relations between managed competition, business model efficiency and novelty, and PTPHO-centred outcomes were investigated among PTPHO managers (n = 138). Theory-based expectations were set up and multiple linear regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: Managed competition and business model efficiency show no relation with PTPHO-centred outcomes. Moderation of the business model efficiency and PTPHO-centred outcomes relation by managed competition contract is not detected. Business model novelty shows a positive relation with PTPHO-centred outcomes. Moderation of the business model novelty and PTPHO-centred outcomes relation by managed competition contract is found. CONCLUSIONS: There seem to be positive relations between business model novelty and PTPHO-centred outcomes on its own and moderated by managed competition contract. No relations seem to exist with business model efficiency. This implies that the combination of persistent use of health insurer-driven managed competition contracts and a naturally efficient PTPHOs may have left too few means for these organisations to contribute to healthcare reforms and attain PTPHO-centred outcomes. Organisation-driven innovation could stretch system-level regulations and provide room for new business models. Optimising contracts towards organisation-driven healthcare reform, including novelty requirements and corresponding reimbursements is suggested. PTPHO managers may want to shift their attitudes towards novel business models.


Assuntos
Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Competição em Planos de Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde
3.
Health Policy ; 126(7): 693-703, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35644719

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Within the Dutch healthcare system of managed competition, health insurers can contract healthcare providers selectively. Enrollees who choose a health insurance policy with restrictive conditions will have to make a co-payment if they consult a non-contracted provider. This study aims to gain insight into enrollees' awareness of the conditions of such health insurance policies. METHODS: In August 2020, an online questionnaire was sent out via health insurers to their enrollees with restrictive health plans. In total 13,588 enrollees responded. RESULTS: One fifth of the respondents appeared to be totally unfamiliar with the policy conditions. Men, younger people, people with a low level of education, a lower income, a poorer health status and non-care users were found to be less familiar with the conditions. Of those who have been in the situation that they wanted to visit a healthcare provider whose care was not fully reimbursed, 62% went to that provider. Of those who had to pay extra because hospital care was not fully reimbursed, 62% did not know this in advance and 30% indicated that paying extra was a serious problem. CONCLUSIONS: Not all enrollees who choose a policy with restrictive conditions are aware of the consequences of receiving care from non-contracted providers. Increased awareness among enrollees will benefit the functioning of the healthcare system based on managed competition.


Assuntos
Seguradoras , Seguro Saúde , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Competição em Planos de Saúde , Países Baixos
4.
Health Policy ; 126(2): 122-128, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35000802

RESUMO

In health care systems based on managed competition, enrolees can choose between insurers who are positioned as prudent buyers of care on their behalf. To avoid risk selection, insurers are compensated through a system of risk equalisation. The Dutch system of risk equalisation is generally considered to be one of the most sophisticated in the world. Empirical evidence, however, shows there are still consumer segments that are profitable for insurers. To examine whether insurers use target marketing for attracting these segments, we assessed promotional material used by Dutch insurers during the switching season of 2019. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that large insurers with different brands primarily use their sub brands as strategic vehicles to improve their competitive positions by targeting these brands at financially favourable groups and price sensitive buyers. By contrast, the more visible main brands are targeted at a much broader spectrum of consumer groups to display the insurer's social character. Only a minority of insurers' marketing expressions are targeted at actual users of care. Despite continuous improvements in the risk equalisation system, on average this group is still unprofitable for insurers. From a health policy perspective, further improvements are key to motivate health insurers to target their efforts at improving care for the chronically ill and to eliminate incentives for risk selection.


Assuntos
Seguradoras , Seguro Saúde , Humanos , Competição em Planos de Saúde , Marketing , Países Baixos
5.
Health Econ Policy Law ; 17(2): 212-219, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32883395

RESUMO

In the last decades, several European health systems have abandoned their vertically integrated health care in favour of some form of managed competition (MC), either in a centralised or decentralised format. However, during a pandemic, MC may put health systems under additional strain as they are designed to follow some form of 'organisational self-interest', and hence face reduced incentives for both provider coordination (e.g. temporary hospital close down, change in the case-mix), and information sharing. We illustrate our argument using evidence for the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak in Italy during March and April 2020, which calls for the development of 'coordination mechanisms' at times of a health emergency.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Competição em Planos de Saúde , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Health Econ Policy Law ; 17(2): 220-223, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32883401

RESUMO

One of the main governance decisions that policymakers need to make is whether to implement public services via centralized or decentralized forms. As Costa et al. discuss in their article, when public services are implemented via competing systems, service providers contend to provide good services with the ultimate objective of gaining market quota. This is known as managed competition (MC), as the authorities will have to manage the panoply of public and private organizations offering the service. The alternative is to manage the service more centrally, in what it is identified as vertical integration. As the authors describe, several governments around the globe have abandoned their vertical integrated models in favour of decentralized models. This is the case, as the authors recall, for most health services in Europe. While there is an emerging body of evidence suggesting that decentralized MC outperforms vertically integrated models both in terms of efficiency and in terms of service quality, little is known on how these systems react under different circumstances. This means, for example, how these systems can cope with a sudden increase in their service demands.


Assuntos
Competição em Planos de Saúde , Pandemias , Europa (Continente) , Humanos
7.
Health Lit Res Pract ; 5(4): e288-e294, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34756120

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In a health insurance system based on managed competition, such as in the Netherlands, it is important that all citizens can make well-informed decisions on which policy fits their needs and preferences best. However, partly due to the large variety of health insurance policies, there are indications that a significant group of citizens do not make rational decisions when choosing a policy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide more insight into (1) how important it is for citizens in the Netherlands to choose a health insurance policy and (2) how easy it is for them to comprehend the information they receive. METHODS: Data were collected by sending a survey to members of the Nivel Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel in February 2017. The response rate was 44% (N = 659). KEY RESULTS: Our results indicate that citizens in the Netherlands acknowledge the importance of choosing a health insurance policy, but they also point out that it is difficult to comprehend health insurance information. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a section of the citizens do not have the appropriate skills to decide which insurance policy best fits their needs and preferences. Having better insight into their level of health insurance literacy is an important step in the process of evaluating the extent to which citizens can fulfill their role in the health insurance system. Our results suggest that it is important to better tailor information on health insurances to the specific needs and skills of the individual. By doing this, citizens will be better supported in making well-informed decisions regarding health insurance policies, which should have a positive effect on the functioning of the Dutch health insurance system. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2021;5(4):e287-e294.] Plain Language Summary: The number of health insurance policy options to choose from is extensive in the Netherlands. This study explored to what extent citizens in the Netherlands find it important to choose a health insurance policy, and to what extent they comprehend the information they receive. The data were collected in 2017 using the Nivel Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel.


Assuntos
Política de Saúde , Seguro Saúde , Atenção à Saúde , Competição em Planos de Saúde , Países Baixos
8.
Health Econ ; 30(4): 803-819, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33502788

RESUMO

In the Dutch health care system of managed competition, insurers and mental health providers negotiate on prices for mental health services. Contract prices are capped by a regulator who sets a maximum price for each mental health service. In 2013, the majority of the contract prices equaled these maximum prices. We study price setting after a major policy change in 2014. In 2014, mental health care providers had to negotiate prices with each individual health insurer separately, instead of with all insurers collectively as in 2013. Moreover, after a cost-price revision, the regulator increased in 2014 maximum prices by about 10%. Insurers and mental health providers reacted to this policy change by setting most contract prices below the new maximum prices. We find that in 2014 mental health providers with more market power, that is, a higher willingness-to-pay measure, contracted significantly higher prices. Some insurers negotiated significantly lower prices than other insurers but these differences are unrelated to an insurers' market share.


Assuntos
Seguradoras , Saúde Mental , Competição Econômica , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Competição em Planos de Saúde , Países Baixos , Políticas
9.
Health Policy ; 125(1): 27-33, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33189409

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2006 a major healthcare reform was introduced in the Netherlands, implying managed competition. This study explored the level of consensus on the outcomes and desired changes of this new system, and differences between stakeholder groups. METHODS: A three-round Delphi-study was conducted among Dutch healthcare insurers, health economists, and professionals in general practice (GP) care and mental health (MH) care. In the first round, 20 experts indicated the most important advantages and disadvantages of the Dutch managed competition, and desired changes. Experts in the second (n = 106) and third round (N = 88) rated the importance of the 88 factors identified in the first round. RESULTS: Only healthcare insurers reached consensus on important advantages (i.e. improved efficiency; room for choice). Health economists reached almost no consensus on any factors. GP and MH-care professionals reached most consensus on disadvantages (i.e. focus on price over quality, increased bureaucracy) and desired changes (i.e. reduce bargaining power of healthcare insurers; increase attention for care of complex patients); half of them suggested abolishment of managed competition. CONCLUSION: GP and MH-care professionals were most dissatisfied and suggested several changes or even abolishment of the 2006 reform; healthcare insurers mentioned some benefits. This level of dissatisfaction among health care professionals indicates that there is room for improvement, preferably developed in conjunction with stakeholders.


Assuntos
Seguro Saúde , Competição em Planos de Saúde , Atenção à Saúde , Técnica Delfos , Humanos , Países Baixos
10.
Health Econ Policy Law ; 16(3): 273-289, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32690116

RESUMO

In health care systems based upon managed competition, insurers are expected to negotiate with providers about price and quality of care. The Dutch experience, however, shows that quality plays a limited role in insurer-provider negotiations. It has been suggested that this is partly due to a lack of cooperation among insurers. This raises the question whether cooperation amongst insurers is a precondition or a substitute for quality-based competition. To answer this question, we mapped insurers' cooperating activities to enhance quality of care using a six-stage continuum. The first three stages (defining, designing and measuring quality indicators) may enhance competition, whereas the next three stages (setting benchmarks, steering patients and selective contracting) may reduce it. We investigated which types of insurer cooperation currently take place in the Netherlands. Additionally, we organized focus groups among insurers, providers and other stakeholders to examine their perceptions on insurer cooperation. We find that all stakeholders see advantages of cooperation amongst insurers in the first stages of the continuum and sometimes cooperate in this domain. Cooperation in the next stages is almost absent and more controversial because without adequate quality information, it is difficult to assess whether the benefits outweigh the cost associated with reduced competition.


Assuntos
Seguradoras/normas , Colaboração Intersetorial , Competição em Planos de Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Países Baixos
11.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 376, 2020 May 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32370798

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Consumer mobility is an important aspect of a health insurance system based on managed competition. Both the general population and insured with a chronic illness should enjoy an equal opportunity to switch their insurer every year. We studied possible differences in the rates of switching between these two groups in the Netherlands. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was sent to 1500 members of Nivel's Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel (response rate: 47%) and to 1911 chronically ill members of the National Panel of the Chronically ill and Disabled (response rate: 84%) in February 2016. Associations between switching and background characteristics were estimated using logistic regression analyses with interaction effects. RESULTS: In general, we did not find significant differences in switching rates between the general population and chronically ill population. However, a combination of the population and background characteristics demonstrated that young insured with a chronic illness switched significantly less often than young insured from the general population (1% versus 17%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that the group of young people with a chronic illness is less inclined to switch insurer. This observation suggests that this group might either face difficulties or barriers which prevents them from switching, or that they experience a high level of satisfaction with their current insurer. Further research should therefore focus on unravelling the mechanisms which explain the differences in switching rates.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Seguradoras/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Comportamento de Escolha , Pessoas com Deficiência/psicologia , Pessoas com Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Empírica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Competição em Planos de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
12.
J Health Polit Policy Law ; 45(4): 501-515, 2020 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32186333

RESUMO

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is in many ways a success. Millions more Americans now have access to health care, and the ACA catalyzed advances in health care delivery reform. Simultaneously, it has reinforced and bolstered a problem at the heart of American health policy and regulation: a love affair with choice. The ACA's insurance reforms doubled down on the particularly American obsession with choice. This article describes three ways in which that doubling down is problematic for the future of US health policy. First, pragmatically, health policy theory predicts that choice among health plans will produce tangible benefits that it does not actually produce. Most people do not like choosing among health plan options, and many people-even if well educated and knowledgeable-do not make good choices. Second, creating the regulatory structures to support these choices built and reinforced a massive market bureaucracy. Finally, and most important, philosophically and sociologically the ACA reinforces the idea that the goal of health regulation should be to preserve choice, even when that choice is empty. This vicious cycle seems likely to persist based on the lead up to the 2020 presidential election.


Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Compreensão , Comportamento do Consumidor , Trocas de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Competição em Planos de Saúde/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organização & administração , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Medicaid , Estados Unidos
13.
Health Policy ; 124(2): 174-182, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31932076

RESUMO

Many healthcare systems, including The Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland, have incorporated elements of managed competition, whereby insurers compete for enrollees in a marketplace organized or facilitated by a government or governing entity. In these countries, managed competition was introduced with the idea that the system would contain cost growth while maximizing value for consumers and employers. An important mechanism to control costs is selective contracting: the process of contracting providers into a network and offer insurance packages with varying levels of provider coverage. In these systems, enrollees are expected to choose lower cost plans which offer access to only contracted providers in the network. The questions is, however, if restricting provider choice leads to reduced healthcare expenditures. In the United States, enrollees often have a choice between plans with restricted networks of providers and plans that offer more provider choice, where care outside the contracted network of providers is (partly) covered. The purpose of this study is to understand whether insurance plans with restrictions on provider access in the United States have reduced healthcare expenditures and to identify the mechanism by which that reduction occurred. We used data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative sample of families and individuals. We estimated expenditures for enrollees in restricted network plans using two-part models and generalized linear models. We found that restricted network plans, on average, save $761 per enrollee. Our results suggest that cost savings due to restricted network plans are largely a result of price reductions rather than utilization reductions, although both play a role in cost savings. When introducing reforms shifting from a supply-oriented to a demand-oriented health care system, these findings might be worth considering by other countries.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/organização & administração , Competição em Planos de Saúde , Comportamento do Consumidor/economia , Redução de Custos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Estados Unidos
14.
Health Econ Policy Law ; 15(3): 341-354, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30973119

RESUMO

In the Dutch health care system, health insurers negotiate with hospitals about the pricing of hospital products in a managed competition framework. In this paper, we study these contract prices that became for the first time publicly available in 2016. The data show substantive price variation between hospitals for the same products, and within a hospital for the same product across insurers. About 27% of the contract prices for a hospital product are at least 20% higher or lower than the average contract price in the market. For about half of the products, the highest and the lowest contract prices across hospitals differ by a factor of three or more. Moreover, hospital product prices do not follow a consistent ranking across hospitals, suggesting substantial cross-subsidization between hospital products. Potential explanations for the large and seemingly random price variation are: (i) different cost pricing methods used by hospitals, (ii) uncertainty due to frequent changes in the hospital payment system, (iii) price adjustments related to negotiated lumpsum payments and (iv) differences in hospital and insurer market power. Several policy options are discussed to reduce variation and increase transparency of hospital prices.


Assuntos
Contratos/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Economia Hospitalar , Competição em Planos de Saúde/economia , Acesso à Informação , Contratos/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguradoras/economia , Competição em Planos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Países Baixos
16.
J Health Econ ; 66: 195-207, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255968

RESUMO

The conventional method for developing health care plan payment systems uses observed data to study alternative algorithms and set incentives for the health care system. In this paper, we take a different approach and transform the input data rather than the algorithm, so that the data used reflect the desired spending levels rather than the observed spending levels. We present a general economic model that incorporates the previously overlooked two-way relationship between health plan payment and insurer actions. We then demonstrate our systematic approach for data transformations in two Medicare applications: underprovision of care for individuals with chronic illnesses and health care disparities by geographic income levels. Empirically comparing our method to two other common approaches shows that the "side effects" of these approaches vary by context, and that data transformation is an effective tool for addressing misallocations in individual health insurance markets.


Assuntos
Seguro Saúde/organização & administração , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica/economia , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro/economia , Seguro/organização & administração , Seguro Saúde/economia , Masculino , Competição em Planos de Saúde/economia , Competição em Planos de Saúde/organização & administração , Medicare/economia , Medicare/organização & administração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Estados Unidos
17.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 34(2): e1312-e1322, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30977557

RESUMO

In a system of managed competition, selective contracting and patient choice reward providers for quality improvements through increases in patient numbers and revenue. We research whether these mechanisms function as envisioned by investigating the relationship between quality improvements and patient numbers in assisted reproduction technology in the Netherlands. Success rate improvements primarily reduce volume as fewer secondary treatments are necessary, but this can be compensated by attracting new patients. Using nationwide registry data from 1996 to 2016, we find limited evidence that high-quality clinics attract new patients, and insufficiently as to compensate for the reduction in secondary treatments. The net effect of quality increases appears to be a small decline in revenue. Therefore, we conclude that patient choice and active purchasing reward quality improvements insufficiently. Nevertheless, clinics have improved quality drastically over the last years, showing that financial incentives are perhaps less important factors for quality improvements than factors such as intrinsic motivation and professional autonomy.


Assuntos
Competição em Planos de Saúde/organização & administração , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Competição em Planos de Saúde/economia , Modelos Estatísticos , Países Baixos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Sistema de Registros , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/economia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Health Policy ; 123(3): 288-292, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30635139

RESUMO

A central element of the 2006 health insurance reform in the Netherlands is strategic purchasing by health insurers. After a brief elaboration of the concept of trust this article discusses the trust of insured in the new purchasing role of health insurers. There are various indications of a trust problem or credible commitment problem in Dutch health care. Insured say to trust their own health insurer (specific trust) but also say to have little trust in the behaviour of health insurers in general(institutional trust). The article briefly explores four models to explain the trust problem: the lack-of information model, the anticompetition model, the pro-profession model and the political communication model. A critical analysis demonstrates that the 'objective ground' for low institutional trust is rather questionable. Low trust seems to be based more on perceptions than on the insurers' objective purchasing behaviour. The article ends with a discussion on some potential strategies to address the trust problem. Low institutional trust may be something insurers have to live with.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Consumidor , Seguro Saúde/organização & administração , Confiança , Humanos , Competição em Planos de Saúde , Países Baixos
19.
Health Policy ; 123(3): 293-299, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30268584

RESUMO

In health care systems based on managed competition, insurers are expected to negotiate with providers about price, quantity, and quality of care. The Dutch experience shows that this expectation may be justified with regard to price and quantity, but for quality the results are less conclusive. To examine the incentives insurers face for enhancing quality of care, we conducted in-depth interviews with CEOs and organised separate focus groups with purchasers and marketers of five Dutch health insurers. Jointly these insurers account for more than 90 percent of the market. We distinguished three categories of both positive and negative incentives to steer on quality: social, competitive and financial incentives. The overall picture emerging is that insurers are caught in a struggle between positive and negative incentives, with CEOs being more positive about the incentives to steer on quality than purchasers and marketers. At present, the social mission perceived by insurers seems to be their most important driver to invest in quality enhancement. However, whether or not the role of the social mission is sustainable in a competitive market remains unclear. Improving publicly available information on quality therefore seems to be crucially important for reinforcing the positive as well as counteracting the negative incentives insurers face with respect to enhancing quality of care.


Assuntos
Seguradoras , Competição em Planos de Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Comportamento do Consumidor , Competição Econômica , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Competição em Planos de Saúde/normas , Países Baixos , Pesquisa Qualitativa
20.
Health Policy Plan ; 33(9): 1037-1046, 2018 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30462221

RESUMO

This paper studies the effect on hospital service prices of a health system reform that allows managed selective contracting and regulation as a means for efficiency and price competition. Cross-sectional data about prices and market structure were analysed from a pool of 20 markets which includes 15 million Colombians. A multilevel regression method comparing three different market settings was performed. The analysis evaluates the effects of insurer choice, hospital quality and market characteristics using a nationwide health services transactional database. A Hirshmann-Herfindahl index was applied to evaluate the markets concentration. Among the results, bilateral monopolies were made evident, both in insurance and hospital markets. Insurer selective contracting policy has the greatest impact on pricing with hospital monopoly heavy effect on health service prices. Colombian government has a challenge in regulating managed competition in order to maintain competition and access to healthcare. Health reforms using market competition as a mechanism for efficiency should follow closely health services market evolution in order to introduce effective regulatory policies.


Assuntos
Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Competição em Planos de Saúde , Colômbia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Estudos Transversais , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...