Investigation of community knowledge, attitudes and stigma towards leprosy in Nigeria: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about community knowledge and stigma towards leprosy in endemic settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate community knowledge, attitudes and stigma towards leprosy in Nigeria. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods study consisting of a quantitative cross-sectional survey of community members and qualitative focus group discussions with community members and people affected by leprosy as well as key informant interviews with healthcare workers and community leaders. RESULTS: Of the 811 survey participants, 401 (49.4%) had a poor knowledge of leprosy that was driven by cultural beliefs, fear of its contagiousness and poor knowledge of its means of transmission. The participants reported high stigma levels with a mean score of 18.96±7.73 on the Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue Community Stigma Scale and 9.39±7.03 on the Social Distance Scale. Stigma levels were influenced by age, residence, education and knowledge of leprosy. Qualitative data suggested that community members were scared of leprosy infectiousness, and local illness concepts and misconceptions informed attitudes and behaviour towards leprosy in the community. CONCLUSION: Community members have a poor knowledge of, and high stigma levels towards leprosy. Culture-specific health education and behavioural change interventions are needed to address the identified gaps.

Interventions to reduce leprosy related stigma: A systematic review.

Stigmatisation is a major issue faced by those affected by leprosy globally. Reducing stigmatisation encourages care seeking behaviour to occur earlier and can help reduce harm and spread of leprosy. This systematic literature review aimed to summarise what effective stigma reducing interventions exist for leprosy, and as a secondary question explore what evidence exists regarding their cost. A systematic literature review was conducted. Three databases-PubMed, Embase and Web of science-were searched using the search terms "leprosy", "interven*", "reduc*", and "stigma*".Seventeen publications were eligible for inclusion in the review. The current manuscript identified interventions under 6 main categories (i) Information, education, and communication (IEC) (ii) community led projects, (iii) Socioeconomic rehabilitation, (iv) mixed interventions, (v) integration of leprosy within the health system and (vi) Cosmetic or surgical care. Specific evidence regarding cost was only provided by one out of the seventeen papers. Multiple interventions were shown to successfully reduce leprosy related stigma, however, information on their cost is not readily available. The evidence uncovered by this review is restricted to three Asian countries; Nepal, India and Indonesia. To ensure the success of stigma reduction in leprosy interventions worldwide these interventions need to be tried in other leprosy endemic areas to test their effectiveness across contextual and cultural scenarios.

Community-Based Intervention for Active Detection and Provision of Single-Dose Rifampicin Post-Exposure Prophylaxis to Household Contacts of Leprosy in Bolivia.

BACKGROUND: To achieve zero leprosy cases in Santa Cruz, Bolivia, we designed a community-based active detection and provision of single-dose rifampicin post-exposure prophylaxis (SDR-PEP) to household contacts with new leprosy patients. METHODS: From July to August 2021, we assessed the current knowledge, attitude, and practices through structured interviews and focus group discussions with community representatives and health staff. This was followed by sensitization sessions, the training of health staff, and the reinforcement of referral mechanisms. Teams, including health staff and community volunteers, visited all new leprosy patients detected in 2021-2023 and household contacts. RESULTS: Among 115 community representatives, knowledge about leprosy etiology was attributed to non-biological factors (74%); fear accounted for 77%, and access to care was perceived as weak (74%), but the outlook was improved by SDR-PEP (80%). Among the 217 health staff interviewed, the programmatic barriers identified were a lack of referral feedback (67%), limited supplies for diagnosis and prevention, and ineffective training (64%). We visited 70 new patients and 258 household contacts. The median age in household contacts was 25 years old; 49% were women, 98% were eligible for SDR-PEP, and all who were eligible accepted it. Those who were non-eligible included one tuberculosis patient and six newly detected leprosy patients (23‱). CONCLUSIONS: A community-based intervention was successful in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Misbeliefs and a lack of knowledge were identified as barriers. Programmatic components should be reinforced for SDR-PEP extension.

Effectiveness of Sensitization Campaigns in Reducing Leprosy-Related Stigma in Rural Togo: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the global strategy to eliminate leprosy, there remains a need for early case detection to successfully interrupt transmissions. Poor knowledge about leprosy and leprosy-related stigma are key drivers of delayed diagnosis and treatment. Sensitization campaigns to inform and increase awareness among the general population are an integral part of many national neglected tropical disease programs. Despite their importance, the effectiveness of such campaigns has not been rigorously studied in the West African context. A multilingual rural setting with low health literacy in this region presents challenges to the potential impact of sensitization campaigns. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to assess the causal effect of common practice community sensitization campaigns on leprosy-related knowledge and stigma at the community level and among community health volunteers. Additionally, we will test the potential of novel educational audio tools in the 15 most prominent local languages to overcome literacy and language barriers and amplify sensitization campaigns. METHODS: We will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial using a sequential mixed methods approach in 60 rural communities across all regions of Togo, West Africa. The study features 2 intervention arms and 1 control arm, with intervention and control assignments made at the community level through randomization. Communities in intervention arm 1 will receive a sensitization campaign in line with the current Togolese national neglected tropical disease program. Communities in intervention arm 2 will receive the same sensitization campaign along with educational audio tools distributed to community households. The control arm will receive no intervention before data collection. Quantitative outcome measures on knowledge and stigma will be collected from a random sample of 1200 individuals. Knowledge will be assessed using the 9-item standardized Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Questionnaire. Stigma will be measured using the 7-item Social Distance Scale and the 15-item Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue Community Stigma Scale. We will estimate intention-to-treat effects at the individual level, comparing the outcomes of the intervention and control arms. In an accompanying qualitative component, we will conduct in-depth interviews with community members, community health volunteers, and health care workers in both treatment arms and the control arm to explore intervention and stigma-related experiences. RESULTS: This paper describes and discusses the protocol for a mixed methods cluster randomized controlled trial. Data collection is planned to be completed in June 2024, with ongoing data analysis. The first results are expected to be submitted for publication by the end of 2024. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will be among the first to test the causal effectiveness of community-based sensitization campaigns and audio tools to increase knowledge and reduce leprosy-related stigma. As such, the results will inform health policy makers, decision-makers, and public health practitioners designing sensitization campaigns in rural multilingual settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00029355; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00029355. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52106.

Experiences of social stigma of people living with Hansen's disease in Brazil: silencing, secrets and exclusion.

BACKGROUND: Hansen's disease is a chronic, infectious and transmissible disease that is considered a public health problem in Brazil. Hansen's disease is marked by stigma and prejudice, because it carries with it a strong negative social image, reinforced by policies of social isolation in the community. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in Ribeirão Preto, an inland city of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Eleven patients under treatment for the disease were interviewed. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed in full, then were analyzed through the stages of transcription, transposition and reconstitution, as informed by concepts proposed by Goffman. RESULTS: The results showed that the marks of stigma are still present in the twenty-first century and were presented in two axes: 'Stigma and work for the person affected by Hansen's disease' and 'The experience of stigma in the family'. The participants refer to fears of losing their jobs and of being ridiculed, which stops them talking about the disease. Regarding their families, the participants reported episodes of discrimination, the creation of family secrets and fear of relatives' reactions. CONCLUSIONS: All these aspects interfere in the follow-up and treatment of patients and need to be considered and welcomed by health professionals. It is recommended that these aspects are addressed in the initial training and continuing education of health professionals. CONTEXTE: La maladie de Hansen est une maladie chronique, infectieuse et transmissible, considérée comme un problème de santé publique au Brésil. La maladie de Hansen est marquée par la stigmatisation et les préjugés, car elle véhicule une image sociale fortement négative, renforcée par des politiques d'isolement social au sein de la communauté. MÉTHODES: Étude qualitative menée à Ribeirão Preto, une ville intérieure de l'État de São Paulo, au Brésil. Onze patients traités pour la maladie ont été interrogés. Les entretiens ont été enregistrés et transcrits intégralement, et ont été analysés en suivant les étapes de transcription, de transposition et de reconstitution, selon les concepts proposés par Goffman. RÉSULTATS: Les résultats montrent que les marques de la stigmatisation sont toujours présentes au 21ème siècle et ont été présentées selon deux axes : 'La stigmatisation et le travail pour la personne affectée par la maladie de Hansen' et 'L'expérience de la stigmatisation dans la famille'. Les participants évoquent la peur de perdre leur emploi, la peur d'être ridiculisés, ce qui les pousse à ne pas parler de la maladie. En ce qui concerne les familles, les participants ont rapporté des épisodes de discrimination, la création de secrets de famille et la peur des réactions des proches. CONCLUSIONS: Tous ces aspects interfèrent dans le suivi et le traitement des patients et doivent être pris en compte et accueillis par les professionnels de la santé. Il est recommandé que ces aspects soient abordés dans la formation initiale et la formation continue des professionnels de la santé. ANTECEDENTES: La enfermedad de Hansen es una enfermedad crónica, infecciosa y transmisible, considerada un problema de salud pública en Brasil. La enfermedad de Hansen está marcada por el estigma y el prejuicio, ya que conlleva una fuerte imagen social negativa, reforzada por políticas de aislamiento social en la comunidad. MÉTODOS: Estudio cualitativo realizado en Ribeirão Preto, una ciudad del interior del estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Se entrevistaron a once pacientes en tratamiento para la enfermedad. Las entrevistas fueron grabadas en audio, transcritas en su totalidad y analizadas a través de etapas de transcripción, transposición y reconstitución, según los conceptos propuestos por Goffman. RESULTADOS: Los resultados muestran que las marcas del estigma siguen presentes en el siglo XXI y se presentaron en dos ejes: 'Estigma y trabajo para la persona afectada por la enfermedad de Hansen' y 'La experiencia del estigma en la familia'. Los participantes mencionan el miedo a perder sus trabajos, el temor a ser ridiculizados, lo que les impide comentar sobre la enfermedad. En cuanto a las familias, los participantes reportaron episodios de discriminación, la creación de secretos familiares y el miedo a las reacciones de los familiares. CONCLUSIONES: Todos estos aspectos interfieren en el seguimiento y tratamiento de los pacientes y deben ser considerados y acogidos por los profesionales sanitarios. Se recomienda abordar estos aspectos en la formación inicial y la educación continua de los profesionales sanitarios.

Clofazimine-induced cutaneous hyperpigmentation as a source of stigma in the treatment of leprosy: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Cutaneous hyperpigmentation is one of the main adverse effects encountered in patients undergoing leprosy treatment with multidrug therapy (WHO-MDT). This adverse effect has been described as intolerable and capable of contributing to social stigma. The objectives of this study were to quantify the variation in skin colour induced by clofazimine during and after treatment and to assess the related stigma. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study objectively measured skin colour in 51 patients by reading the individual typology angle (ITA°) with a spectrophotometer, followed by the application of the Stigma Scale of the Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue (EMIC). RESULTS: Skin hyperpigmentation was observed in 100% of the individuals. They showed more negative ITA° values in lesion areas than non-lesion areas, particularly in sun-exposed regions. Clofazimine-induced cutaneous hyperpigmentation was not homogeneous and seemed to follow the lesion locations. The mean EMIC score was 18.8 points. CONCLUSION: All patients presented skin hyperpigmentation caused by clofazimine, detectable through spectrophotometry. Hyperpigmentation strongly impacted the social domain, indicating the intersectionality of disease and skin colour stigma, contributing to the social isolation of these patients. Health authorities should consider the negative impact of clofazimine on treatment adherence.

A experiência da sexualidade em mulheres com hanseníase: uma análise de conteúdo / The experience of sexuality in women with leprosy: a content analysis

Ao propor explorar o entrelaçamento entre a experiência da mulher e a vivência do corpo doente, pretendeu-se com essa pesquisa identificar e descrever os impactos da vivência da hanseníase na sexualidade de mulheres de modo a caracterizar os desdobramentos psicológicos e atitudinais em relação a vivência de gênero e a vida sexual. A pesquisa realizada partiu de uma abordagem qualitativa, para tanto foram entrevistadas 9 mulheres com hanseníase, maiores de 18 anos e em tratamento da doença por ao menos 2 anos. Após realizado o tratamento dos dados, o método de análise de conteúdo foi utilizado para identificar aproximações e diferenças nos discursos das participantes a partir de duas categorias: 1) Impactos da hanseníase na vivência de gênero; 2) Impactos da hanseníase na vida sexual. A análise das narrativas das participantes apontaram para impactos psicológicos relacionados a experiência de gênero como dificuldades de imagem corporal e autoestima por conta da doença e tratamento, isolamento social e dificuldade de se expor a novos contextos relacionais. Em relação à vida sexual, a análise indica maior dificuldade nas práticas sexuais e na experiência de prazer devido a diversos fatores como: baixa autoestima; a influência dos medicamentos na libido; a diminuição da sensibilidade perceptiva do toque; medo de contaminar parceiros; e dores neuropáticas durante as práticas sexuais. Destarte, a hanseníase gerou dificuldades na vivência da sexualidade das participantes e enquanto um tópico negligenciado merece mais atenção nos atendimentos multiprofissionais.

Impact of basic psychological support on stigma and mental well-being of people with disabilities due to leprosy and lymphatic filariasis: a proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: People with leprosy and lymphatic filariasis (LF)-related disabilities experience higher levels of poor mental well-being compared with the general community. Mental health services are often not available. This study was conducted to provide proof of concept that basic psychological support for people affected by neglected tropical diseases (BPS-N) can be given by peer supporters to reduce stigma, improve mental well-being and participation among clients. METHODS: The BPS-N approach was tested in a quasi-experimental design using mixed methods. To provide psychological support using the BPS-N, peer supporters were selected and trained. They supported people with leprosy- and LF-related disabilities. Preintervention and postintervention, stigma, mental well-being, depression and participation were measured through standard scales within 4 wk of the intervention; differences were tested using standard tests of significance. RESULTS: After 3 mo of intervention, the mean level of stigma had decreased (30.3 to 24, p<0.001); high mental well-being increased (0% to 13.3%, p<0.001); and moderate to severe depression decreased (88% to 47%, p<0.001). No significant change occurred in participation restrictions (87% to 92%, p=0.497). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological peer support using the BPS-N guideline appears effective in reducing stigma and improving mental well-being and can be operationalised. However, this should be confirmed through a randomised controlled trial. CONTEXTE: Les personnes atteintes de lèpre et de handicaps liés à la filariose lymphatique (FL) souffrent davantage d'un manque de bien-être mental que le reste de la population. Les services de santé mentale ne sont souvent pas disponibles hors des zones urbaines. Cette étude a été menée pour démontrer que le soutien psychologique de base pour les personnes atteintes de MTN (BPS-N) peut être dispensé par des pairs (dans une logique de transfert de tâches) afin de réduire la stigmatisation et d'améliorer le bien-être mental et la participation des clients. MÉTHODES: L'approche du BPS-N a été testée dans le cadre d'un modèle quasi-expérimental utilisant des méthodes mixtes. Pour fournir un soutien psychologique à l'aide du BPS-N, des pairs ont été sélectionnés et formés. Ils sont venus en aide aux personnes atteintes de lèpre et de déficiences liées à la FL. Avant et après l'intervention, les éléments suivants ont été mesurés à l'aide d'échelles standardisées: niveau de stigmatisation, bien-être mental, symptômes dépressifs, et enfin, la participation sociale. Les différences ont été testées à l'aide de tests de signification standardisés. RÉSULTATS: Après 3 mois d'intervention, le niveau moyen de stigmatisation a diminué (30,3 à 24, p<0 001) ; le niveau de bien-être mental a augmenté (0% à 13,3%, p<0 001) et la dépression modérée à sévère a diminué (88% à 47%, p<0 001). Aucun changement significatif n'a été observé en ce qui concerne les restrictions de participation (87% contre 92%, p=0 497). CONCLUSIONS: Le soutien psychologique par les pairs utilisant la ligne directrice BPS-N semble efficace pour réduire la stigmatisation et améliorer le bien-être mental. Toutefois, cette efficacité doit être confirmée par un essai contrôlé randomisé. ANTECEDENTES: Las personas con lepra y discapacidades relacionadas con la filariasis linfática (FL) sufren niveles más altos de malestar mental en comparación con la comunidad en general. Los servicios de salud mental no suelen estar disponibles a nivel periférico. Este estudio se llevó a cabo para proporcionar una prueba de concepto de que el Apoyo Psicológico Básico para personas afectadas por NTDs (BPS-N) puede ser dado por compañeros de apoyo (rotación de tareas) para reducir el estigma, mejorar el bienestar mental y la participación entre los clientes. MÉTODOS: El enfoque BPS-N se probó en un diseño cuasi-experimental utilizando métodos mixtos. Para proporcionar apoyo psicológico con el BPS-N, se seleccionaron y formaron compañeros de apoyo. Apoyaron a personas con lepra y discapacidades relacionadas con la FL. El estigma, el bienestar mental, la depresión y la participación se midieron antes y después de la intervención, mediante escalas estándar; las diferencias se comprobaron mediante pruebas estándar de significación. RESULTADOS: Después de 3 meses de intervención, el nivel medio de estigma disminuyó (30,3 a 24, p<0 001); el bienestar mental alto aumentó (0% a 13,3%, p<0 001) y la depresión moderada a grave disminuyó (88% a 47%, p<0 001). No se produjeron cambios significativos en las restricciones de participación (87% frente a 92%, p=0 497)). CONCLUSIONES: El apoyo psicológico entre iguales, utilizando la guía BPS-N, parece eficaz para reducir el estigma y mejorar el bienestar mental. Sin embargo, esto debe confirmarse mediante un ensayo controlado aleatorizado.

Impact of basic psychological support on stigma and the mental well-being of people with disabilities due to leprosy and lymphatic filariasis: a postintervention evaluation study.

BACKGROUND: A peer support intervention, called basic psychological support for people affected by neglected tropical diseases (BPS-N), was piloted in India to improve mental well-being and social participation and to reduce stigma among people with disabilities due to leprosy or lymphatic filariasis. Preintervention and postintervention assessments showed improvements in mental well-being and reductions in depression and stigma. This study aimed to further evaluate this intervention at approximately 2 mo after its completion. METHODS: Scales were administered to 62 clients to measure stigma, depression, mental well-being and participation levels. Interviews with 13 clients and six peer supporters were conducted. RESULTS: Stigma scores were significantly reduced at 2 mo postintervention compared with preintervention and postintervention. The improvement in mental well-being detected at immediate postintervention had not changed significantly 2 mo later. Depression levels were higher than at postintervention, but lower than at preintervention levels. No significant differences were found in median participation scores, but the number of clients with moderate and severe participation restrictions reduced significantly from postintervention to 2 mo follow-up. Qualitative results showed that clients received information about their condition and treatment, and that some experienced positive effects on their emotions and self-esteem. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides additional evidence on the proof of concept of BPS-N. CONTEXTE: Une intervention de soutien par les pairs, appelée Soutien psychologique de base pour les personnes atteintes de maladies tropicales négligées (BPS-N), a été pilotée en Inde afin d'améliorer le bien-être mental et la participation sociale, et de réduire la stigmatisation, chez les personnes souffrant d'incapacités dues à la lèpre ou à la filariose lymphatique. Les évaluations avant et après l'intervention ont montré une amélioration du bien-être mental et une réduction de la dépression et de la stigmatisation chez ces personnes. Cette étude avait pour but d'évaluer cette intervention environ 2 mois après son achèvement. MÉTHODES: Des échelles ont été administrées à 62 clients pour mesurer la stigmatisation, la dépression, le bien-être mental et les niveaux de participation. Des entretiens ont été menés avec 13 clients et 6 pairs aidants. RÉSULTATS: Les scores de stigmatisation ont été significativement réduits deux mois après l'intervention par rapport à la situation avant et après l'intervention. L'amélioration du bien-être mental détectée immédiatement après l'intervention n'a pas changé de manière significative deux mois plus tard. Les niveaux de dépression étaient plus élevés qu'après l'intervention, mais plus bas qu'avant l'intervention. Aucune différence significative n'a été constatée dans les scores médians de participation, mais le nombre de clients ayant des restrictions de participation modérées et sévères a diminué de manière significative entre la période post-intervention et les deux mois de suivi. Les résultats qualitatifs ont montré que les clients ont reçu des informations sur leur état et leur traitement, et que certains ont ressenti des effets positifs sur leurs émotions et leur estime de soi. CONCLUSIONS: Cette étude a fourni des preuves supplémentaires de l'efficacité de la BPS-N. INTRODUCCIÓN: Una intervención de apoyo entre iguales, denominada Apoyo Psicológico Básico para personas afectadas por enfermedades tropicales desatendidas (BPS-N), se puso a prueba en la India para mejorar el bienestar mental y la participación social y reducir el estigma entre las personas con discapacidades debidas a la lepra o la filariasis linfática. Las evaluaciones previas y posteriores a la intervención mostraron mejoras en el bienestar mental y reducciones en la depresión y el estigma. El objetivo de este estudio era seguir evaluando esta intervención ∼2 meses después de su finalización. MÉTODOS: Se administraron escalas a 62 clientes para medir el estigma, la depresión, el bienestar mental y los niveles de participación. Se realizaron entrevistas con 13 clientes y 6 compañeros de apoyo. RESULTADOS: Las puntuaciones de estigma se redujeron significativamente a los 2 meses de la intervención, en comparación con antes y después de la misma. La mejora del bienestar mental detectada inmediatamente después de la intervención no había cambiado significativamente 2 meses después. Los niveles de depresión eran más altos que en el postintervención, pero más bajos que en el preintervención. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en las puntuaciones medias de participación, pero el número de clientes con restricciones de participación moderadas y graves se redujo significativamente entre el periodo posterior a la intervención y los 2 meses de seguimiento. Los resultados cualitativos mostraron que los clientes recibieron información sobre su enfermedad y tratamiento, y que algunos experimentaron efectos positivos en sus emociones y autoestima. CONCLUSIONES: Este estudio aportó pruebas adicionales sobre la prueba de concepto de la BPS-N.

Steps towards eliminating Hansen's disease stigma.

Persons affected by Hansen's disease (PAHD) can develop long-term physical disabilities and psychological problems if the disease is not managed promptly and correctly. The complex and multi-faceted nature of stigma related to Hansen's Disease, and the discrimination arising from it, demands multiple parallel steps to improve the health, well-being and lived experience of People Affected by Hansen's Disease, including: 1) adoption and pursuance of a human rights based approach; 2) revocation of discriminatory laws; 3) education and training for healthcare workers; 4) new techniques and therapies to diagnose and treat HD without side-effects and to reduce risk of disabilities; 5) elimination of stigmatising terminology.

Stigma, depression and quality of life among people affected by neglected tropical diseases in Nepal.

BACKGROUND: Stigma and poor mental health are important factors influencing the quality of life (QOL) of people with neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). This study examines the relationship between stigma, depression and QOL among people affected by leprosy and lymphatic filariasis (LF) in Nepal. METHODS: A cross-sectional community-based survey was conducted among 102 NTD-affected persons (70 leprosy and 32 LF) using interview-administered questionnaires measuring the level of stigma (5-QSI-AP), symptoms of depression (PHQ-9) and QOL (WHOQOL-8). Three different regression models were developed, each using the ordinary least squares and Poisson regression to evaluate the association between stigma and QOL, depression and QOL, and stigma and depression. RESULTS: The mean scores were 21.8±4.4 for QOL, 6.6±5.6 for depression and 3.0±2.8 for stigma. Almost 17% reported the prevalence of depression symptoms. Both stigma (ß=-0.65, p<0.001) and depression (ß=-0.32, p<0.001) were associated with lower scores for QOL, while there was a significant positive relationship between stigma and depression (ß=0.92, p<0.001). Similar results were obtained from the Poisson regression models. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed a considerable burden of depression, stigma and poor QOL among study participants with leprosy and LF in Nepal. A holistic package of care that addresses the physical, mental and psychological well-being of people with NTD is required. CONTEXTE: La stigmatisation et la mauvaise santé mentale sont des facteurs importants qui influencent la qualité de vie des personnes atteintes de maladies tropicales négligées (MTN). Cette étude examine la relation entre la stigmatisation, la dépression et la qualité de vie chez les personnes atteintes de lèpre et de filariose lymphatique au Népal. MÉTHODES UTILISÉES: Une enquête communautaire transversale a été menée auprès de 102 personnes atteintes de MTN (70 de la lèpre et 32 de la filariose lymphatique) à l'aide de questionnaires administrés par entretien mesurant le niveau de stigmatisation (5-QSI-AP), les symptômes de dépression (PHQ-9) et la qualité de vie (WHOQOL-8). Trois modèles de régression différents ont été développés, chacun utilisant les moindres carrés ordinaires et la régression de Poisson pour évaluer l'association entre : (i) la stigmatisation et la QV; (ii) la dépression et la QV; et (iii) la stigmatisation et la dépression. RÉSULTATS: Les scores moyens étaient de 21,8±4,4 pour la QV, 6,6±5,6 pour la dépression, et 3,0±2,8 pour la stigmatisation. Près de 17% des personnes interrogées ont signalé la prévalence de symptômes dépressifs. La stigmatisation (ß = -0,65, p<0 001) et la dépression (ß = -0,32, p<0 001) ont été associées à des scores plus faibles pour la qualité de vie, tandis qu'il existait une relation positive significative entre la stigmatisation et la dépression (ß = 0,92, p<0 001). Des résultats similaires ont été obtenus à partir des modèles de régression de Poisson. CONCLUSIONS: L'étude a montré une incidence importante de dépression, de stigmatisation et d'une mauvaise qualité de vie parmi les participants atteints de lèpre et de FL au Népal. Il convient donc de mettre en place un ensemble de soins holistiques pour ces patients qui prendrait en compte le bien-être physique, mental et psychologique des personnes atteintes de MTN. ANTECEDENTES: La estigmatización y la mala salud mental son factores importantes que influyen en la calidad de vida de las personas con enfermedades tropicales desatendidas. las personas con enfermedades tropicales desatendidas (ETD). Este estudio examina la relación entre el estigma, la depresión y la CdV entre las personas afectadas por lepra y lepra y la filariasis linfática en Nepal. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una encuesta comunitaria transversal entre 102 personas afectadas por ETD (70 de lepra y 32 de filariasis linfática) utilizando cuestionarios entrevistas para medir el nivel de estigma (5-QSI-AP), los síntomas de depresión (PHQ- 9) y la CdV (OMS- 9). 9) y la calidad de vida (WHOQOL-8). Se desarrollaron tres modelos de regresión diferentes regresión de Poisson para evaluar la asociación entre: (i) el estigma y (ii) la depresión. entre: (i) estigma y CdV; (ii) depresión y CdV; y (iii) estigma y depresión. RESULTADOS: Las puntuaciones medias fueron 21,8±4,4 para la CdV, 6,6±5,6 para la depresión y 3,0±2,8 para el estigma. Casi el 17% informó de la prevalencia de síntomas de depresión. Tanto el estigma (ß = -0,65, p<0 001), como la depresión (ß = -0,32, p<0 001) se asociaron con puntuaciones más bajas para la CdV, mientras que hubo una relación positiva significativa entre el estigma y la depresión (ß = 0,92, p<0 001). Se obtuvieron resultados similares en los modelos de regresión de Poisson. CONCLUSIONES: El estudio mostró una carga considerable de depresión, estigma y mala CdV entre los participantes del estudio con lepra y FL en Nepal. Se requiere un paquete holístico de atención que aborde el bienestar físico, mental y psicológico de las personas con ETD.

Mental health, stigma and the quality of life of people affected by neglected tropical diseases of the skin in Kasai Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a sex-disaggregated analysis.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, persons affected by skin Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) may experience stigma and discrimination, which could lead to impaired societal functioning and poor mental wellbeing. Evidence of comorbidity of NTDs and mental health conditions is dominated by Leprosy, largely lacking in post-conflict areas, and rarely disaggregated by sex. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey is the first to explore depression, anxiety, stigma, and quality of life amongst people affected by Lymphatic Filariasis, Buruli Ulcer, Onchocerciasis or Leprosy in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. After a census through active case identification, the survey was completed by 118 persons (response rate 94.4%). RESULTS: In total, 58.3% of men and 80.0% of women screened positive for major depressive disorder (PHQ-9). Symptoms indicative of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD-7) were displayed by 54.8% of men and 62.2% of women. Being female, having a disability, experiencing stigma and lower physical quality of life were predictors of depression. Anxiety was predicted by age, physical quality of life, disability (for men only) and environmental quality of life (for women only). CONCLUSIONS: Integrated, intersectoral and gender-sensitive initiatives are needed to respond to the many biopsychosocial challenges that persons affected face. CONTEXTE: Dans le monde entier, les personnes atteintes de maladies tropicales négligées (MTN) peuvent faire l'objet d'une stigmatisation et d'une discrimination, ce qui peut entraîner une altération du fonctionnement de la société et un mauvais bien-être mental. Les preuves de la comorbidité des MTN et des troubles de la santé mentale sont dominées par la lèpre, manquent largement dans les zones post-conflit et sont rarement ventilées par sexe. MÉTHODES UTILISÉES: Cette enquête transversale est la première à explorer la dépression, l'anxiété, la stigmatisation et la qualité de vie chez les personnes atteintes de filariose lymphatique, d'ulcère de Buruli, d'onchocercose ou de lèpre en République démocratique du Congo. Après un recensement par identification active des cas, 118 personnes ont répondu à l'enquête (taux de réponse 94,4%). RÉSULTATS: Au total, 58,3% des hommes et 80,0% des femmes ont été dépistés positifs pour un trouble dépressif majeur (PHQ-9). Des symptômes indiquant un trouble anxieux généralisé (GAD-7) ont été observés chez 54,8 % des hommes et 62,2 % des femmes. Le fait d'être une femme, d'avoir un handicap, d'être stigmatisé et d'avoir une qualité de vie physique inférieure était un facteur prédictif de la dépression. L'anxiété était prédite par l'âge, la qualité de vie physique, le handicap (pour les hommes uniquement) et la qualité de vie environnementale (pour les femmes uniquement). CONCLUSIONS: Des initiatives intégrées, intersectorielles et sensibles au genre sont nécessaires pour répondre aux nombreux défis biopsychosociaux auxquels sont confrontées les personnes touchées. ANTECEDENTES: En todo el mundo, las personas afectadas por Enfermedades Tropicales Desatendidas (ETD) cutáneas pueden sufrir estigmatización y discriminación, lo que podría conducir a un deterioro del funcionamiento social y a un bienestar mental deficiente. La evidencia científica sobre la comorbilidad de las ETD y las afecciones mentales está dominada por la lepra, en general insuficiente en zonas post-conflicto y rara vez se desglosan por sexo. MÉTODOS: Esta encuesta transversal es la primera que explora la depresión, la ansiedad, el estigma y la calidad de vida entre las personas afectadas por la filariasis linfática, la úlcera de Buruli, la oncocercosis o la lepra en la República Democrática del Congo. Tras un censo mediante identificación activa de casos, la encuesta fue completada por 118 personas (tasa de respuesta del 94,4%). RESULTADOS: En total, el 58,3% de los hombres y el 80,0% de las mujeres arrojaron resultados positivos para el trastorno depresivo mayor (PHQ-9). El 54,8% de los hombres y el 62,2% de las mujeres presentaban síntomas indicativos de trastorno de ansiedad generalizada (TAG-7). Ser mujer, tener una discapacidad, sufrir estigmatización y una menor calidad de vida física fueron factores predictivos de la depresión. La edad, la calidad de vida física, la discapacidad (sólo en el caso de los hombres) y la calidad de vida ambiental (sólo en el caso de las mujeres) fueron factores predictivos de la ansiedad. CONCLUSIONES: Se necesitan iniciativas integradas, intersectoriales y con perspectiva de género para responder a los numerosos retos biopsicosociales a los que se enfrentan las personas afectadas.

Hanseniase: é preciso vencer o preconceito | Saúde+ Cast

Antigamente, toda doença dermatológica era conhecida como lepra. Uma delas, e talvez a mais agressiva, seja a hanseníase. Atualmente, o Brasil é o segundo país com mais casos de hanseníase no mundo. A boda notícia é que essa doença tem cura, e quanto mais precoce foir o diagnóstico e o tratamento, melhor. Ouça o bate-papo do Saúde+ Cast com Livia de Andrade Bessa, médica Dermatologista do Programa Municipal de Controle da Hanseníase da COVISA.

Culture circle with community health workers about (lack of) knowledge and stigma of leprosy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the construction aboutthe (lack of) knowledge and stigma of leprosy by Community Health Workers participating in the Culture Circle. METHOD: Qualitative, action-research type study supported by the Paulo Freire Culture Circle framework, carried out with 21 Community Health Workers. Data collected in November 2021, in the municipality of São Luís, Maranhão. The following categories were evidenced: knowledge about leprosy, signs and symptoms, stigma. RESULTS: The participants had knowledge about the disease, but they verbalized people's disinformation about leprosy, disbelief in relation to the cure, and situations of prejudice and stigma that are still present today. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: The culture circle enabled the intertwining of scientific and empirical knowledge in the construction of a critical and reflective knowledge committed to welcoming and comprehensive care for people and families affected by leprosy.

How do Americans perceive the stigma of leprosy?

The stigma of leprosy will have reduced effects if people cannot reliably perceive it. Two factors impact these perceptions: familiarity and entitativity. One hundred and forty-five participants tested this assertion using an online platform to complete measures of stigma about leprosy as well as measures of familiarity and entitativity. The group of 145 completed the same measures of stigma, entitativity, and familiarity 1 week later. Standard deviations of time 1 and time 2 measures of stigma were used as indices of consistent (reliable) perceptions at the individual level. Results showed partial support for familiarity being positively associated with reliable responding. Moreover, high entitativity scores were associated with greater stigma perceptions at time 1 and time 2. Ongoing research on these indicators may be important in crafting future anti-stigma programs for leprosy.