[Hypertension: what's new in 2023]. / Hypertension artérielle : ce qui a changé en 2023.

Highlights for 2023 include the confirmation of hypertension as a cardiovascular risk factor and the standard procedure for measuring blood pressure. Transdermal oestrogens do not appear to be associated with an increased risk of hypertension unlike oestrogen given orally. The usefulness of blood pressure measured in hospital in elderly patients and the risks of intensive treatment are reviewed. A new study suggests that we are not all equal when it comes to recommended treatments. Finally, RNA interference technology has enabled the synthesis of a new antihypertensive treatment administered every 6 months that inhibits the production of hepatic angiotensinogen with a good effect on blood pressure.

Le survol de l'année 2023 met l'accent sur l'hypertension artérielle (HTA) comme facteur de risque cardiovasculaire et sur les conditions de mesure de la pression artérielle. Du côté hormonal, les œstrogènes en application transdermique ne semblent pas être associés à un risque augmenté d'HTA, contrairement à ceux administrés par voie orale. L'utilité de la pression artérielle mesurée en milieu hospitalier chez des patients âgés et les risques de son traitement intensif sont également discutés. Une nouvelle étude suggère que nous ne sommes pas tous égaux face aux traitements recommandés. Enfin, la technologie des ARN interférents a permis la synthèse d'un nouveau traitement antihypertenseur administré aux 6 mois inhibant la production d'angiotensinogène hépatique avec un bon effet sur la pression artérielle.

Real-world evidence for coverage determination of treatments for rare diseases.

Health technology assessment (HTA) decisions for pharmaceuticals are complex and evolving. New rare disease treatments are often approved more quickly through accelerated approval schemes, creating more uncertainties about clinical evidence and budget impact at the time of market entry. The use of real-world evidence (RWE), including early coverage with evidence development, has been suggested as a means to support HTA decisions for rare disease treatments. However, the collection and use of RWE poses substantial challenges. These challenges are compounded when considered in the context of treatments for rare diseases. In this paper, we describe the methodological challenges to developing and using prospective and retrospective RWE for HTA decisions, for rare diseases in particular. We focus attention on key elements of study design and analyses, including patient selection and recruitment, appropriate adjustment for confounding and other sources of bias, outcome selection, and data quality monitoring. We conclude by offering suggestions to help address some of the most vexing challenges. The role of RWE in coverage and pricing determination will grow. It is, therefore, necessary for researchers, manufacturers, HTA agencies, and payers to ensure that rigorous and appropriate scientific principles are followed when using RWE as part of decision-making.

Person-reported outcomes in diabetes care: What are they and why are they so important?

In this review, we aim to show how person-reported outcomes (PROs) and person-reported experiences (PREs) can significantly contribute to the way diabetes care is delivered, the involvement of people with diabetes in diabetes care, and the collaboration between health care professionals and people with diabetes. This review focuses on the definition and measurement of PROs and PREs, the importance of PROs and PREs for person-centred diabetes care, and integrating the perspectives of people with diabetes in the evaluation of medical, psychological and technological interventions. PROs have been increasingly accepted by Health Technology Assessment bodies and are therefore valued in the context of reimbursement decisions and consequently by regulators and other health care stakeholders for the allocation of health care resources. Furthermore, the review identified current challenges to the assessment and use of PROs and PREs in clinical care and research. These challenges relate to the combination of questionnaires and ecological momentary assessment for measuring PROs and PREs, lack of consensus on a core outcome set, limited sensitivity to change within many measures and insufficient standardization of what can be considered a minimal clinically important difference. Another issue that has not been sufficiently addressed is the involvement of people with diabetes in the design and development of measures to assess PROs and PREs.

Undertaking Studies Within A Trial to evaluate recruitment and retention strategies for randomised controlled trials: lessons learnt from the PROMETHEUS research programme.

Background: Randomised controlled trials ('trials') are susceptible to poor participant recruitment and retention. Studies Within A Trial are the strongest methods for testing the effectiveness of strategies to improve recruitment and retention. However, relatively few of these have been conducted. Objectives: PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial aimed to facilitate at least 25 Studies Within A Trial evaluating recruitment or retention strategies. We share our experience of delivering the PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial programme, and the lessons learnt for undertaking randomised Studies Within A Trial. Design: A network of 10 Clinical Trials Units and 1 primary care research centre committed to conducting randomised controlled Studies Within A Trial of recruitment and/or retention strategies was established. Promising recruitment and retention strategies were identified from various sources including Cochrane systematic reviews, the Study Within A Trial Repository, and existing prioritisation exercises, which were reviewed by patient and public members to create an initial priority list of seven recruitment and eight retention interventions. Host trial teams could apply for funding and receive support from the PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial team to undertake Studies Within A Trial. We also tested the feasibility of undertaking co-ordinated Studies Within A Trial, across multiple host trials simultaneously. Setting: Clinical trials unit-based trials recruiting or following up participants in any setting in the United Kingdom were eligible. Participants: Clinical trials unit-based teams undertaking trials in any clinical context in the United Kingdom. Interventions: Funding of up to £5000 and support from the PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial team to design, implement and report Studies Within A Trial. Main outcome measures: Number of host trials funded. Results: Forty-two Studies Within A Trial were funded (31 host trials), across 12 Clinical Trials Units. The mean cost of a Study Within A Trial was £3535. Twelve Studies Within A Trial tested the same strategy across multiple host trials using a co-ordinated Study Within A Trial design, and four used a factorial design. Two recruitment and five retention strategies were evaluated in more than one host trial. PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial will add 18% more Studies Within A Trial to the Cochrane systematic review of recruitment strategies, and 79% more Studies Within A Trial to the Cochrane review of retention strategies. For retention, we found that pre-notifying participants by card, letter or e-mail before sending questionnaires was effective, as was the use of pens, and sending personalised text messages to improve questionnaire response. We highlight key lessons learnt to guide others planning Studies Within A Trial, including involving patient and public involvement partners; prioritising and selecting strategies to evaluate and elements to consider when designing a Study Within A Trial; obtaining governance approvals; implementing Studies Within A Trial, including individual and co-ordinated Studies Within A Trials; and reporting Study Within A Trials. Limitations: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted five Studies Within A Trial, being either delayed (n = 2) or prematurely terminated (n = 3). Conclusions: PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial significantly increased the evidence base for recruitment and retention strategies. When provided with both funding and practical support, host trial teams successfully implemented Studies Within A Trial. Future work: Future research should identify and target gaps in the evidence base, including widening Study Within A Trial uptake, undertaking more complex Studies Within A Trial and translating Study Within A Trial evidence into practice. Study registration: All Studies Within A Trial in the PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial programme had to be registered with the Northern Ireland Network for Trials Methodology Research Study Within A Trial Repository. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 13/55/80) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 2. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

A Study Within A Trial is a research study nested inside a larger 'host trial', promoting the use of Studies Within A Trial aimed to do Study Within A Trial routine practice in clinical trial units by funding and supporting at least 25 Studies Within A Trial. The best way to test health and social care treatments is to do a randomised controlled trial ('trial'), where some patients get the treatment being tested and some do not. The results of different groups are compared to see if the treatment improves care. Recruiting patients and keeping them involved in trials is often very difficult. Research teams often do not know how best to recruit and keep patients engaged as the methods have not been tested to see if they work. The best way to test these methods is by doing a Study Within A Trial. We test a programme of Studies Within A Trial for recruiting and keeping patients engaged in trials. Trial teams were able to apply for funding of up to £5000 and receive support from Promoting the use of Study Within A Trial team to do Studies Within A Trial. We used our experience of doing Studies Within A Trial to outline lessons learnt for doing Studies Within A Trial. We funded 42 Studies Within A Trial and gave teams necessary advice to do them. We significantly increased the knowledge for both recruitment and retention strategies, and found 'pre-notifying' before sending questionnaires, sending pens and personalised text messages were all effective for increasing responses by participants. We tested Studies Within A Trial across several different trials at the same time to find out more quickly whether their methods worked. We highlight key lessons learnt to guide others doing Studies Within A Trial, including involving patient partners; picking the right strategy to test; getting ethical approvals; how to do and report Studies Within A Trial. Promoting the use of studies within a trial was successful and supported more Studies Within A Trial than planned. We hope our experience will support those doing Studies Within A Trial in the future.

Conducting a health technology assessment in the West Bank, occupied Palestinian territory: lessons from a feasibility project.

OBJECTIVES: To achieve universal health coverage (UHC), countries must make difficult choices to optimize the use of scarce resources. There is a growing interest in using evidence-based priority setting processes, such as Health Technology Assessment (HTA), to inform these decisions. In 2020, the Palestinian Institute of Public Health (PNIPH) and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) initiated a pilot to test the feasibility of coproducing an HTA on breast cancer screening in the West Bank, occupied Palestinian Territory. Additionally, a secondary aim was to test whether using an adaptive HTA (aHTA) approach that searched and transferred published evidence syntheses could increase the speed of HTA production. METHODS: The applied stepwise approach to the HTA is described in detail and can be summarized as defining a core team, topic selection, and prioritization; undertaking the HTA including adaptation using tools from the European Network for HTA (EUnetHTA) and stakeholder engagement; and concluding with dissemination. RESULTS: The aHTA approach was faster but not as quick as anticipated, which is attributed to (i) the lack of availability of local evidence for contextualizing findings and (ii) the necessity to build trust between the team and stakeholders. Some delays followed from the COVID-19 pandemic, which showed the importance of good risk anticipation and mitigation. Lastly, other important lessons included the ability of virtual collaborations, the value of capacity strengthening initiatives within low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and the need for early stakeholder engagement. Overall, the pilot was successfully completed. CONCLUSION: This was the first HTA of its kind produced in Palestine, and despite the challenges, it shows that HTA analysis is feasible in this setting.

Exploring the Role of Guidelines in Contributing to Medication Errors: A Descriptive Analysis of National Patient Safety Incident Data.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical guidelines can contribute to medication errors but there is no overall understanding of how and where these occur. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify guideline-related medication errors reported via a national incident reporting system, and describe types of error, stages of medication use, guidelines, drugs, specialties and clinical locations most commonly associated with such errors. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of reports to the National Reporting and Learning System for England and Wales. A hierarchical task analysis (HTA) was developed, describing expected practice when using guidelines. A free-text search was conducted of medication incident reports (2016-2021) using search terms related to common guidelines. All identified reports linked to moderate-severe harm or death, and a random sample of 5100 no/low-harm reports were coded to describe deviations from the HTA. A random sample of 500 cases were independently double-coded. RESULTS: In total, 28,217 reports were identified, with 608 relating to moderate-severe harm or death. Fleiss' kappa for interrater reliability was 0.46. Of the 5708 reports coded, 642 described an HTA step discrepancy (including four linked to a death), suggesting over 3200 discrepancies in the entire dataset of 28,217 reports. Discrepancies related to finding guidelines (n = 300 reports), finding information within guidelines (n = 166) and using information (n = 176). Discrepancies were most frequently identified for guidelines produced by a local organisation (n = 405), and most occurred during prescribing (n = 277) or medication administration (n = 241). CONCLUSION: Difficulties finding and using information from clinical guidelines contribute to thousands of prescribing and medication administration incidents, some of which are associated with substantial patient harm.

Olanzapine for young PEople with aNorexia nervosa (OPEN): A protocol for an open-label feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION: Antipsychotics are routinely prescribed off-label for anorexia nervosa (AN) despite limited evidence. This article presents a protocol of a study aiming to assess the feasibility of a future definitive trial on olanzapine in young people with AN. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In an open-label, one-armed feasibility study, 55 patients with AN or atypical AN, aged 12-24, receiving outpatient, inpatient or day-care treatment who are considered for olanzapine treatment will be recruited from NHS sites based in England. Assessments will be conducted at screening, baseline and at 8-, 16 weeks, 6- and 12 months. Primary feasibility parameters will be proportions of patients who agree to take olanzapine and who adhere to treatment and complete study assessments. Qualitative methods will be used to explore acceptability of the intervention and study design. Secondary feasibility parameters will be changes in body mass index, psychopathology, side effects, health-related quality of life, carer burden and proportion of participants who would enrol in a future randomised controlled trial. The study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research via Health Technology Assessment programme. DISCUSSION: Olanzapine for young PEople with aNorexia nervosa will inform a future randomised controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of prescribing olanzapine in young people with AN.

Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT to Accurately Simplify Patient-centered Information about Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening.

Purpose To evaluate the use of ChatGPT as a tool to simplify answers to common questions about breast cancer prevention and screening. Materials and Methods In this retrospective, exploratory study, ChatGPT was requested to simplify responses to 25 questions about breast cancer to a sixth-grade reading level in March and August 2023. Simplified responses were evaluated for clinical appropriateness. All original and simplified responses were assessed for reading ease on the Flesch Reading Ease Index and for readability on five scales: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Automated Readability Index, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (ie, SMOG) Index. Mean reading ease, readability, and word count were compared between original and simplified responses using paired t tests. McNemar test was used to compare the proportion of responses with adequate reading ease (score of 60 or greater) and readability (sixth-grade level). Results ChatGPT improved mean reading ease (original responses, 46 vs simplified responses, 70; P < .001) and readability (original, grade 13 vs simplified, grade 8.9; P < .001) and decreased word count (original, 193 vs simplified, 173; P < .001). Ninety-two percent (23 of 25) of simplified responses were considered clinically appropriate. All 25 (100%) simplified responses met criteria for adequate reading ease, compared with only two of 25 original responses (P < .001). Two of the 25 simplified responses (8%) met criteria for adequate readability. Conclusion ChatGPT simplified answers to common breast cancer screening and prevention questions by improving the readability by four grade levels, though the potential to produce incorrect information necessitates physician oversight when using this tool. Keywords: Mammography, Screening, Informatics, Breast, Education, Health Policy and Practice, Oncology, Technology Assessment Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

Comparing Survival Extrapolation within All-Cause and Relative Survival Frameworks by Standard Parametric Models and Flexible Parametric Spline Models Using the Swedish Cancer Registry.

BACKGROUND: In health technology assessment, restricted mean survival time and life expectancy are commonly evaluated. Parametric models are typically used for extrapolation. Spline models using a relative survival framework have been shown to estimate life expectancy of cancer patients more reliably; however, more research is needed to assess spline models using an all-cause survival framework and standard parametric models using a relative survival framework. AIM: To assess survival extrapolation using standard parametric models and spline models within relative survival and all-cause survival frameworks. METHODS: From the Swedish Cancer Registry, we identified patients diagnosed with 5 types of cancer (colon, breast, melanoma, prostate, and chronic myeloid leukemia) between 1981 and 1990 with follow-up until 2020. Patients were categorized into 15 cancer cohorts by cancer and age group (18-59, 60-69, and 70-99 y). We right-censored the follow-up at 2, 3, 5, and 10 y and fitted the parametric models within an all-cause and a relative survival framework to extrapolate to 10 y and lifetime in comparison with the observed Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. All cohorts were modeled with 6 standard parametric models (exponential, Weibull, Gompertz, log-logistic, log-normal, and generalized gamma) and 3 spline models (on hazard, odds, and normal scales). RESULTS: For predicting 10-y survival, spline models generally performed better than standard parametric models. However, using an all-cause or a relative survival framework did not show any distinct difference. For lifetime survival, extrapolating from a relative survival framework agreed better with the observed survival, particularly using spline models. CONCLUSIONS: For extrapolation to 10 y, we recommend spline models. For extrapolation to lifetime, we suggest extrapolating in a relative survival framework, especially using spline models. HIGHLIGHTS: For survival extrapolation to 10 y, spline models generally performed better than standard parametric models did. However, using an all-cause or a relative survival framework showed no distinct difference under the same parametric model.Survival extrapolation to lifetime within a relative survival framework agreed well with the observed data, especially using spline models.Extrapolating parametric models within an all-cause survival framework may overestimate survival proportions at lifetime; models for the relative survival approach may underestimate instead.

Rationing in an Era of Multiple Tight Constraints: Is Cost-Utility Analysis Still Fit for Purpose?

Cost-utility analysis may not be sufficient to support reimbursement decisions when the assessed health intervention requires a large proportion of the healthcare budget or when the monetary healthcare budget is not the only resource constraint. Such cases include joint replacement, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) interventions and settings where all resources are constrained (e.g. post-COVID-19 or in low/middle-income countries). Using literature on health technology assessment, rationing and reimbursement in healthcare, we identified seven alternative frameworks for simultaneous decisions about (dis)investment and proposed modifications to deal with multiple resource constraints. These frameworks comprised constrained optimisation; cost-effectiveness league table; 'step-in-the-right-direction' approach; heuristics based on effective gradients; weighted cost-effectiveness ratios; multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA); and programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA). We used numerical examples to demonstrate how five of these alternative frameworks would operate. The modified frameworks we propose could be used in local commissioning and/or health technology assessment to supplement standard cost-utility analysis for interventions that have large budget impact and/or are subject to additional constraints.

Ravulizumabe no tratamento da hemoglobinúria paroxística noturna / Ravulizumabe not treated for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

INTRODUÇÃO: A Hemoglobinúria Paroxística Noturna (HPN) é uma doença rara, com incidência anual estimada de 1,3 novos casos por um milhão de indivíduos. Esta se caracteriza pela ativação descontrolada do complemento, que pode levar à hemólise intravascular (que por sua vez causa os episódios de hemoglobinúria), danos a órgãos (por exemplo, insuficiência renal e hipertensão pulmonar), eventos trombóticos, aumento da morbidade e mortalidade. Inibidores do C5 são opções de tratamento primário para esta doença, tendo sido o primeiro desta classe licenciado no mundo o eculizumabe em 2007. Em 2019 foi lançado o PCDT da HPN, que conta com a inclusão do eculizumabe. Dados de uma coorte nacional de pacientes com HPN mostram que 16% dos pacientes tiveram síndrome mielodisplásica e cerca de metade da amostra apresentava outras anemias aplásticas e/ou outras síndromes de falha de produção de outras linhas celulares sanguíneas (plaquetas e leucócitos). Embolia venosa e trombose venosa ocorreram em 4

RT-PCR para identificação de mutação do receptor do fator de crescimento epidérmico (EGFR) em pacientes com câncer de pulmão de células não pequenas / RT-PCR for identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUÇÃO: O câncer de pulmão foi o segundo tipo de câncer mais diagnosticado (11,4%) no mundo e a principal causa de morte por câncer (18%) durante o ano de 2020, totalizando 2,2 milhões de novos casos e 1,8 milhões de mortes no ano. Considera-se para fins terapêuticos e prognósticos a divisão em dois principais tipos histológicos: câncer de pulmão células não pequenas células (CPCNP), que representa cerca de 85% de todos os casos de câncer de pulmão, e câncer de pulmão pequenas células (CPPC), associado a aproximadamente 15% dos casos. O comportamento biológico dos tumores malignos pode estar relacionado à expressão molecular, principalmente de proteínas envolvidas no crescimento e sobrevivência celulares, de modo que a segurança e a eficácia do tratamento guardam relação não só com o subtipo histopatológico como também com as características moleculares do tumor. Assim, para melhor direcionamento da terapia (por exemplo, erlotinibe e gefinitibe), torna-se importante diferenciar os subtipos histológicos, e identificar a presença de mutações específicas, como, por exemplo formas alteradas no gene do EGFR, como se recomenda nas Diretrizes Diagnósticas e Terapêuticas do Câncer de Pulmão do Ministério da Saúde. Entretanto, o Ministério da Saúde não recomenda nenhuma técnica específica para identificação de mutação no gene do EGFR, sendo que o rt-PCR é considerado o teste de referência em muitos contextos clínicos e estudos, seguido pelo sequenciamento de nova geração (NGS). PERGUNTA: Em pacientes diagnosticados com CPCNP, qual a acurácia diagnóstica, custoefetividade e impacto orçamentário do diagnóstico molecular por meio da técnica de rtPCR para identificação de mutação do EGFR em comparação ao NGS ou a não realização de rt-PCR? EVIDÊNCIAS CIENTÍFICAS: A revisão sistemática identificou 19 estudos observacionais de acurácia diagnóstica (teste de referência: NGS). A sensibilidade e especificidade do rt-PCR em comparação ao NGS foi de 92,0% e 97,0%, respectivamente. Apenas um estudo reportou dados de sobrevida global para a comparação de rt-PCR positivo e negativo para mutação de EGFR, apresentando uma diferença não significativa estatisticamente, de 19,2 versus 11,6 meses (Log rank p=0,143). Todos os estudos apresentaram ao menos um domínio com alto risco de viés e nenhuma preocupação quanto à aplicabilidade. AVALIAÇÃO ECONÔMICA: Na análise de custo-efetividade/utilidade comparou-se a realização de rt-PCR com a não realização do teste para um horizonte temporal por toda vida. A análise sugere que a realização do rt-PCR de mutação do EGFR para auxiliar na padronização do melhor tratamento de pacientes com CPCNP e sem tratamento prévio na fase metastática, em comparação a não realização do teste, sugere um modesto benefício clínico de 0,043 ano de vida ajustado pela qualidade (QALY) e 0,040 ano de vida (AV) ganho e uma economia de R$ 3.138,25. Portanto, rt-PCR dominou a não realização do teste (razão de custo-efetividade incremental, RCEI, não representada em casos de dominância). Ademais, as análises de sensibilidade determinística revelaram que para QALY e AV, as proporções de pacientes que usam o erlotinibe e gefitinibe são as variáveis que mais impactam na RCEI, seguida pela proporção de resultados positivos obtidos pela rt-PCR de mutação do EGFR. AVALIAÇÃO DE IMPACTO ORÇAMENTÁRIO: Considerando um horizonte temporal de cinco anos, utilizando demanda aferida (dados de APAC de 2015 a 2021) foi estimado o quantitativo de pacientes com carcinoma pulmonar de células não pequenas avançado. Ademais, foi estimada uma taxa de difusão conservadora, tendo um aumento de 10% ao ano para a tecnologia em análise. Desta forma, observou-se que a incorporação do rt-PCR para identificação de mutação do EGFR em pacientes com CPCNP, sem tratamento prévio na fase metastática, pode gerar um incremento de R$ 1.553.250,00 no primeiro ano, chegando a um incremento de R$ 8.193.750,00 no quinto ano de análise (total acumulado de cerca de R$ 24 milhões em cinco anos) em análise que não considera as potenciais economias com a incorporação do teste. Em análise de sensibilidade considerando preço 20% menor, coerente com preço informado por um dos fabricantes contatados, o impacto orçamentário acumulado em cinco anos seria de cerca de R$ 20 milhões. MONITORAMENTO DO HORIZONTE TECNOLÓGICO: No Monitoramento do Horizonte Tecnológico foi encontrada 1 tecnologia, a Allele-Discriminating Priming System (kit - ADPS), da empresa Genecast, sem identificação de licenças sanitárias Anvisa e FDA. CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS: A evidência disponível sobre o uso de rt-PCR para identificação de mutação EGFR em comparação ao NGS sugere elevada acurácia do rt-PCR, com sensibilidade e especificidade de 92,0% e 97,0%, respectivamente. A análise de custoefetividade sugere que a realização da rt-PCR de mutação do EGFR em pacientes com CPCNP, em comparação a não realização do teste, é dominante para QALY e AV. A análise de impacto orçamentário da incorporação da rt-PCR de mutação do EGFR em pacientes com CPCNP, no SUS, sugere um incremento de cerca de R$ 21 a 40 milhões em cinco anos de análise, a depender do preço do kit e market share considerado, em análise que não considera a potencial economia com a incorporação do teste. RECOMENDAÇÃO PRELIMINAR DA CONITEC: Os membros do Comitê de Procedimentos e Produtos, presentes na 123ª Reunião Ordinária da Conitec realizada no dia 05 de outubro de 2023, deliberaram por unanimidade que a matéria fosse disponibilizada em consulta pública com recomendação preliminar favorável à incorporação do diagnóstico molecular por meio da técnica de rt-PCR para identificação de mutação do EGFR em pacientes com câncer de pulmão de células não pequenas. CONSULTA PÚBLICA: A consulta pública nº 51 foi realizada entre os dias 12 de dezembro de 2023 e 02 de janeiro de 2024. Foram recebidas 50 contribuições, sendo 6 classificadas como técnico-científicas e 44 como de experiência ou opinião. Todas as contribuições foram favoráveis à incorporação de rt-PCR para identificação de mutação do EGFR em pacientes com CPCNP. Referente às contribuições técnico-científicas, os estudos sugeridos para inclusão no PTC não contemplavam os critérios de elegibilidade da pergunta PIROS e todas as demais contribuições corroboram os resultados apresentados no relatório de recomendação. Quanto às contribuições de experiência e opinião, das 44 recebidas, uma foi desconsiderada por tratar de outra consulta pública. Também foram recebidos dois anexos. As contribuições recebidas e anexos foram submetidos à análise de conteúdo temática. Das 43 contribuições consideradas, todas expressaram concordância em relação à recomendação preliminar da Conitec, portanto, mostraramse favoráveis à incorporação do procedimento em avaliação. Os participantes que tiveram experiência com o rt-PCR relataram como efeitos positivos a importância do uso e acesso ao teste para os pacientes usuários do SUS terem um melhor direcionamento no tratamento do câncer de pulmão de células não pequenas. Enquanto efeitos negativos e dificuldades no uso do rt-PCR, foram apontados a dificuldade no acesso e o custo. RECOMENDAÇÃO FINAL DA CONITEC: Os membros do Comitê de Produtos e Procedimentos presentes na 126ª Reunião Ordinária da Conitec deliberaram, por unanimidade, recomendar a incorporação de rt-PCR para identificação da mutação do receptor do fator de crescimento epidérmico (EGFR) em pacientes com câncer de pulmão de células não pequenas. Foi assinado o Registro de Deliberação nº 876/2024. DECISÃO: e incorporar, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS, o RT-PCR para identificação de mutação do receptor do fator de crescimento epidérmico (EGFR) em pacientes com câncer de pulmão de células não pequenas, publicada no Diário Oficial da União nº 46, seção 1, página 54, em 07 de março de 2024.

Hidroxiureia 100 mg e 1000 mg para o tratamento de pacientes com doença falciforme com pelo menos 9 meses de idade / Hydroxyureia 100 mg and 1000 mg for the treatment of patients with sickle cell disease with hair less than 9 months old

INTRODUÇÃO: Atualmente, a hidroxiureia é disponibilizada no SUS como cápsula de 500 mg, entretanto, foram submetidas para a análise do Comitê de Medicamentos da Conitec duas demandas para a incorporação desse medicamento nas formas farmacêuticas de comprimidos de 100 e 100 mg, o que motivou a elaboração desse relatório técnico. A primeira demanda partiu do grupo de especialistas que participam do processo de atualização do Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas de Doença Falciforme (PCDTDF). Para essa primeira demanda, o objetivo foi analisar somente o impacto orçamentário de uma possível incorporação da hidroxiureia nas concentrações de 100 e 1000 mg para o tratamento de indivíduos com pelo menos 9 meses de idade. A análise apenas do impacto orçamentário foi realizada porque o referido grupo elaborador do PCDTDF também solicitou a avaliação da ampliação de uso da hidroxiureia para todas as crianças entre 9 meses e 2 anos de idade independentemente de critérios de inclusão, que hoje é a regra para o fornecimento de hidroxiureia nesta

Hidroxiureia para o tratamento de pacientes com doença falciforme (SS, Sbeta0 e SD Punjab), entre 9 e 24 meses de idade, sem sintomas e complicações / Hydroxyureia for the treatment of patients with sickle cell disease (SS, Sbeta0 and SD Punjab), between 9 and 24 months of age, without symptoms and complications

INTRODUÇÃO: As manifestações clínicas da doença falciforme (DF) estão relacionadas à anemia hemolítica e aos efeitos da falcização intravascular repetida, resultando em vasooclusão e lesão isquêmica, além de morbidade e mortalidade consideráveis em idade precoce. Atualmente, a hidroxiureia é o padrão de tratamento para prevenir crises de dor vasoclusivas na DF, sendo recomendada para crianças entre 9 e 24 meses de idade, quando apresentam determinados sintomas ou complicações. Considerando que o uso precoce desta tecnologia (antes de 2 anos de idade) pode evitar o comprometimento a longo prazo relacionados à evolução da DF, o objetivo do presente relatório é analisar as evidências científicas sobre eficácia, efetividade, segurança, bem como evidências econômicas relacionadas ao uso de hidroxiureia para o tratamento de indivíduos com doença falciforme (SS, Sbeta0 e SD Punjab) entre 9 e 24 meses de idade, independentemente de sintomas e complicações. PERGUNTA: O uso de h

Testagem Molecular para Detecção de HPV e rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero / Molecular Testing for HPV Detection and Uterus Colon Cancer Tracking

INTRODUÇÃO: Evidências científicas robustas indicam que o rastreamento com testes moleculares para detecção de HPV oncogênico é mais sensível, eficaz/efetivo e eficiente, em termos do aumento de detecção de lesões precursoras e da redução da incidência e mortalidade por CCU, do que o rastreio com exame citopatológico. Outro aspecto fundamental é a maior detecção de casos de CCU em estágio inicial, precedendo em até 10 anos o diagnóstico pelo exame citopatológico. A detecção precoce leva a tratamentos menos mutilantes e onerosos, com excelente prognóstico e até com possibilidade de cura, impactando positivamente a custo-efetividade do rastreamento. Ademais, por apresentarem maior sensibilidade e valor preditivo negativo (VPN), quando comparados à citologia, os testes para detecção de HPV de alto risco permitem o aumento da idade de início do rastreio e do intervalo de testagem, melhorando a eficiência e otimizando o desempenho dos programas. PERGUNTA: "A testagem molecular para detecção de HPV

Ablação térmica para o tratamento do câncer de cólon e reto com metástase hepática irressecável ou ressecável com alto risco cirúrgico / Thermal ablation for colon cancer treatment and challenge with unresectable liver metastasis or resect with high surgical risk

INTRODUÇÃO: As técnicas de ablação são usadas para destruir tumores pequenos (até 4 cm), sem removê-los com cirurgia ou para diminuir seu tamanho possibilitando a cirurgia. A ablação por radiofrequência já é utilizada no SUS para tratamento do carcinoma hepático primário localizado, em estágios I e II. PERGUNTA DE PESQUISA: Para adultos com diagnóstico de câncer de cólon e reto com metástase hepática irressecável ou ressecável com alto risco cirúrgico, o tratamento com ablação térmica (por radiofrequência ou por micro-ondas) é eficaz, efetivo, seguro, custoefetivo e viável economicamente quando comparado ao tratamento com quimioterapia? EVIDÊNCIAS CIENTÍFICAS: Identificaram-se, por busca estruturada, duas revisões sistemáticas e dois estudos primários (duas publicações de um ECR de fase 2, de 2002 a 2007, e um estudo observacional retrospectivo). Não foi identificada evidência para ablação por micro-ondas que atendesse aos critérios de elegibilidade deste PTC. No estudo observa

Acetato de lanreotida e acetato de octreotida de liberação prolongada para o tratamento de pacientes com sintomas associados a tumores endócrinos gastroenteropancreáticos funcionais / Lanreotide acetate and extended-release octreotide acetate for the treatment of patients with symptoms associated with functional gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors

INTRODUÇÃO: Os tumores neuroendócrinos (TNE) são neoplasias, com origem mais comum no trato gastrointestinal, que podem cursar com liberação de hormônios associado a sintomas, levando a síndrome carcinoide, com incidência anual estimada em 0,25/1.000.000 na Europa (ano de 2008). As manifestações clínicas mais comuns incluem diarreia secretória e rubor súbito, mas a diarreia é considerada mais debilitante com potencial risco de morte. Quando o tratamento curativo com ressecção completa não é viável pela presença de doença metastática, o tratamento é direcionado para o controle dos sintomas da síndrome carcinoide e os análogos da somatostatina (octreotida ou lanreotida) são considerados terapia de primeira linha na SC. PERGUNTAS DE PESQUISA: O acetato de octreotida de liberação prolongada (octreotida LAR) e o acetato de lanreotida de liberação prolongada (lanreotida LP) são eficazes, seguros e custo-efetivos para o tratamento dos sintomas relacionados à SC associados ao TNE gastroenteropancreático funcional em pacientes adultos? EVIDÊNCIAS CLÍNICAS: Foram selecionados três ensaios clínico

Evaluación de la intervención de fisioterapia en los pacientes con sarcopenia y fractura de cadera: una revisión sistemática / Evaluation of physiotherapy intervention in patients with sarcopenia and hip fracture: A systematic review

Introducción La sarcopenia en los pacientes con fractura de cadera es cada vez más habitual en la población envejecida, aumentando el riesgo de hospitalización, dependencia y mortalidad. Objetivos Valorar el tratamiento de fisioterapia más efectivo en los pacientes con sarcopenia y fractura de cadera a través de la revisión de evidencia sistemática. Métodos Se realizó una búsqueda entre febrero y mayo de 2022 en 8 bases de datos electrónicas (Pubmed, Scopus, PEDro, Web of Science, Cochrane, Google Scholar y Springer Link), con el fin de extraer ensayos clínicos publicados en los últimos 12 años en español e inglés. Resultados Se seleccionaron 3 ensayos clínicos que cumplían los criterios de inclusión. En todos ellos las intervenciones de fisioterapia incluían ejercicio aeróbico, de fuerza, de alta intensidad, de movilizaciones y combinados. La calidad metodológica se evaluó con la escala PEDro (puntuación media entre 6 y 10). Uno de los estudios no encuentra diferencias entre el tratamiento estándar y el grupo que recibe además entrenamiento progresivo de fuerza muscular. Otro constata una mejora a corto plazo en el grupo que recibe además del tratamiento convencional entrenamiento en cinta rodante con soporte del peso corporal durante el ejercicio con seguimiento a los 3 y 6 meses. El estudio que suplementa con aminoácidos esenciales es el único que constata una mejoría en los pacientes con sarcopenia. Conclusión Los pacientes con sarcopenia y fractura de cadera, pueden tener una mejor evolución si combinan ejercicios de fisioterapia con un protocolo nutricional. Son necesarias más investigaciones metodológicamente rigurosas sobre este tema para poder ampliar la evidencia. (AU)

Introduction Sarcopenia in patients with hip fracture is increasingly common in the elderly population, increasing the risk of hospitalization, dependency, and mortality. Objectives To assess the most effective physiotherapy treatment in patients with sarcopenia and hip fracture through systematic evidence review. Methods Electronic databases were searched from February to May 2022 using Pubmed, Scopus, PEDro, Web of Science, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Springer Link in order to extract randomized clinical trials published in full text both English and Spanish for the last 12 years. Results Three clinical trials that met the inclusion criteria were selected. In all of them, the physiotherapy interventions included aerobic, strength, high intensity, mobilization, and combined exercises. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale (average score between 6 and 10). One of the studies found no differences between the standard treatment and the group that also received progressive muscle strength training. Another found a short-term improvement in the group that received, in addition to conventional treatment, treadmill training with body weight support during exercise with follow-up that was not maintained at three and six months. The study that supplements with essential amino acids is the only one that confirms an improvement in patients with sarcopenia. Conclusion Patients with sarcopenia and hip fracture may have a better evolution if they combine physiotherapy exercises with a nutritional protocol. More methodologically rigorous research on this topic is needed to expand the evidence. (AU)

Topic identification, selection, and prioritization for health technology assessment in selected countries: a mixed study design.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence-informed guidance on TISP processes for countries where health technology assessment (HTA) is in a nascent phase. We aimed to explore the range of topic identification, selection and prioritization (TISP) processes and practices for HTA in selected countries and identify aspects relevant to emerging HTA systems. METHODS: This mixed design study included a systematic literature review, an electronic survey, and individual interviews. We conducted a systematic literature review with criteria that were developed a priori to identify countries deemed to have a recently formalized HTA system. Based on the literature review, a twenty-three item online survey was shared with the identified countries, we completed follow-up interviews with ten participants who have experience with HTA. We analyzed documents, survey responses and interview transcripts thematically to identify lessons related to TISP processes and practices. RESULTS: The literature review identified 29 nine candidate countries as having a "potential" recently formalized HTA system. Twenty-one survey responses were analyzed and supplemented with ten individual interviews. We found variation in countries' approaches to TISP - particularly between pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions. Results indicate that TISP is heavily driven by policy makers, expert involvement, and to a lesser extent, relevant stakeholders. The use of horizon-scanning and early warning systems is uncommon. Interviewee participants provided further insight to the survey data, reporting that political awareness and an institutional framework were important to support TISP. TISP can be optimized by stronger national regulations and legislative structures, in addition to education and advocacy about HTA among politicians and decision-makers. In some settings regional networks have been useful, particularly in the development of TISP guidelines and methodologies. Additionally, the technical capacity to conduct TISP, and access to relevant local data were factors limiting TISP in national settings. Increased network collaboration and capacity building were reported as future needs. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides current insights into a topic where there is limited published peer reviewed literature. TISP is an important first step of HTA, and topics should be selected and prioritized based on local need and relevance. The limited capacity for TISP in settings where HTA is emerging may be supported by local and international collaboration to increase capacity and knowledge. To succeed, both TISP and HTA need to be embedded within national health care priority setting and decision-making. More in-depth understanding of where countries are situtated in formalizing the TISP process may help others to overcome factors that facilitate or hinder progress.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of an adapted intervention for preschoolers with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities displaying behaviours that challenge: the EPICC-ID RCT.

Background: Stepping Stones Triple P is an adapted intervention for parents of young children with developmental disabilities who display behaviours that challenge, aiming at teaching positive parenting techniques and promoting a positive parent-child relationship. Objective: To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of level 4 Stepping Stones Triple P in reducing behaviours that challenge in children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities. Design, setting, participants: A parallel two-arm pragmatic multisite single-blind randomised controlled trial recruited a total of 261 dyads (parent and child). The children were aged 30-59 months and had moderate to severe intellectual disabilities. Participants were randomised, using a 3 : 2 allocation ratio, into the intervention arm (Stepping Stones Triple P; n = 155) or treatment as usual arm (n = 106). Participants were recruited from four study sites in Blackpool, North and South London and Newcastle. Intervention: Level 4 Stepping Stones Triple P consists of six group sessions and three individual phone or face-to-face contacts over 9 weeks. These were changed to remote sessions after 16 March 2020 due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Main outcome measure: The primary outcome measure was the parent-reported Child Behaviour Checklist, which assesses the severity of behaviours that challenge. Results: We found a small non-significant difference in the mean Child Behaviour Checklist scores (-4.23, 95% CI -9.98 to 1.52, p = 0.146) in the intervention arm compared to treatment as usual at 12 months. Per protocol and complier average causal effect sensitivity analyses, which took into consideration the number of sessions attended, showed the Child Behaviour Checklist mean score difference at 12 months was lower in the intervention arm by -10.77 (95% CI -19.12 to -2.42, p = 0.014) and -11.53 (95% CI -26.97 to 3.91, p = 0.143), respectively. The Child Behaviour Checklist mean score difference between participants who were recruited before and after the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was estimated as -7.12 (95% CI -13.44 to -0.81) and 7.61 (95% CI -5.43 to 20.64), respectively (p = 0.046), suggesting that any effect pre-pandemic may have reversed during the pandemic. There were no differences in all secondary measures. Stepping Stones Triple P is probably value for money to deliver (-£1057.88; 95% CI -£3218.6 to -£46.67), but decisions to roll this out as an alternative to existing parenting interventions or treatment as usual may be dependent on policymaker willingness to invest in early interventions to reduce behaviours that challenge. Parents reported the intervention boosted their confidence and skills, and the group format enabled them to learn from others and benefit from peer support. There were 20 serious adverse events reported during the study, but none were associated with the intervention. Limitations: There were low attendance rates in the Stepping Stones Triple P arm, as well as the coronavirus disease 2019-related challenges with recruitment and delivery of the intervention. Conclusions: Level 4 Stepping Stones Triple P did not reduce early onset behaviours that challenge in very young children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities. However, there was an effect on child behaviours for those who received a sufficient dose of the intervention. There is a high probability of Stepping Stones Triple P being at least cost neutral and therefore worth considering as an early therapeutic option given the long-term consequences of behaviours that challenge on people and their social networks. Future work: Further research should investigate the implementation of parenting groups for behaviours that challenge in this population, as well as the optimal mode of delivery to maximise engagement and subsequent outcomes. Study registration: This study is registered as NCT03086876 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03086876?term=Hassiotis±Angela&draw=1&rank=1). Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: HTA 15/162/02) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 6. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Research shows that in children without learning disabilities, parenting groups which support parents to develop skills to manage behaviours that challenge in their child can be helpful. The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence recommended that more research was needed to strengthen the evidence for such interventions for children with moderate to severe learning disability who are more likely to display behaviours that challenge in England. In this study, we tested in real-world conditions a programme called level 4 Stepping Stones Triple P, which has shown positive results in trials outside of the United Kingdom. Trained therapists delivered six groups and three individual sessions over 9 weeks to parents of children aged 30­59 months with moderate to severe learning disabilities. Two hundred and sixty-one parents were allocated to one of two arms by chance (randomisation): one received Stepping Stones Triple P and treatment as usual and the other treatment as usual only. Treatment as usual included support and advice by general practitioners or community child development teams. Our primary outcome was parent-reported child behaviour at 12 months after randomisation. We also collected data on other outcomes and carried out interviews with parents, service managers and therapists to find out their views about Stepping Stones Triple P. We did not find that Stepping Stones Triple P reduces behaviours that challenge in the child more than treatment as usual at 12 months. However, when we looked at people who received more than half of the sessions, there was a larger reduction in behaviours which suggests that Stepping Stones Triple P works for families if they attend the full programme. Stepping Stones Triple P seems to be good value for money, as we found that at 12 months (covering 10 months of costs), the Stepping Stones Triple P cost £1058 less than treatment as usual from a health and social care perspective. As such, Stepping Stones Triple P is fairly cheap to deliver and a suitable early intervention for behaviours that challenge especially because of positive feedback from parents. Throughout the trial, we included a Parent Advisory Group that oversaw study materials, interview topic guides and promotion of the study.