Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Reprod Health ; 17(1): 88, 2020 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32503556

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. In Afghanistan, where most births take place at home without the assistance of a skilled birth attendant, there is a need for options to manage PPH in community-based settings. Misoprostol, a uterotonic that has been used as prophylaxis at the household level and has also been proven to be effective in treating PPH in hospital settings, is one possible option. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted in six districts in Badakhshan Province, Afghanistan to test the effectiveness and safety of administering 800mcg sublingual misoprostol to women after a home birth for treatment of excessive blood loss. Consenting women were enrolled prior to delivery and given 600mcg misoprostol to self-administer orally as prophylaxis. Community health workers (CHW) were trained to observe for signs of PPH after delivery and if PPH was diagnosed, administer the study medication (misoprostol or placebo) and immediately refer the woman. A hemoglobin (Hb) decline of 2 g/dL or greater, measured pre- and post-delivery, served as the primary outcome; side effects, additional interventions, and transfer rates were also analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 1884 women who delivered at home, nearly all (98.7%) reported self-use of misoprostol for PPH prevention. A small fraction was diagnosed with PPH (4.4%, 82/1884) and was administered treatment. Hb outcomes, including the proportion of women with a Hb drop of 2 g/dL or greater, were similar between the study groups (misoprostol: 56.4% (22/39), placebo: 60.6% (20/33), p = 0.45). Significantly more women randomized to receive misoprostol experienced shivering (82.5% vs. placebo: 61.5%, p = 0.03). Other side effects were similar between study groups and none required treatment, including among the subset of 39 women, who received misoprostol for both of its PPH indications. CONCLUSIONS: While the study did not document a clinical benefit associated with misoprostol for treatment of PPH, study findings suggest that use of misoprostol for both prevention and treatment in the same birth as well as its use by lay level providers in home births does not result in any safety concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01508429 Registered on December 1, 2011.


Assuntos
Misoprostol/administração & dosagem , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Administração Sublingual , Adulto , Afeganistão , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Hemoglobinas/análise , Parto Domiciliar , Humanos , Tocologia , Placebos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/sangue , Gravidez , Autoadministração
2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 144(3): 290-296, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30582753

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical and programmatic feasibility of using 800 µg of sublingual misoprostol to prevent and treat postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) during home delivery. METHODS: The present double-blind randomized controlled trial included women who underwent home deliveries in Chitral district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan, after presenting at healthcare facilities during the third trimester of pregnancy between May 28, 2012, and November 27, 2014. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 800 µg of misoprostol or placebo sublingually if PPH was diagnosed, having previously received a prophylactic oral dose of 600 µg misoprostol. The primary outcome, hemoglobin decrease of 20 g/L or greater from pre- to post-delivery assessment, was compared on a modified intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: There were 49 patients allocated to receive misoprostol and 38 allocated to receive placebo; the incidence of a 20 g/L decrease in hemoglobin was similar between the groups (20/43 [47%] vs 19/33 [58%], respectively; P=0.335). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two trial arms. ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01485562.


Assuntos
Parto Domiciliar , Tocologia/métodos , Misoprostol/administração & dosagem , Ocitócicos/administração & dosagem , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Sublingual , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Paquistão , Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Contraception ; 100(6): 451-456, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31491379

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, acceptability and feasibility of a one-day outpatient medication abortion service at gestations 13-18 weeks. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label prospective study in which participants received mifepristone 200 mg orally to swallow at home or at the clinic followed 24 h later by misoprostol 400 mcg buccally. They presented to the outpatient clinic 24-48 h after mifepristone for misoprostol 400 mcg buccally every three hours (no maximum dose). The primary outcome was successful abortion without transfer to overnight inpatient care. Secondary outcomes included time to abortion from initial misoprostol dose, safety, additional interventions and side effects. RESULTS: We enrolled 230 women from December 2017 to November 2018. Approximately nine of ten (n = 206, 89.6%) achieved a successful abortion without transfer to overnight care. Twenty-four were transferred to overnight inpatient care; of these 18 were to manage a complication, five for incomplete abortion and two by choice. Among these 24, three women experienced an SAE. The median time to successful abortion from time of the first misoprostol dose was 7.2 h (range: 0.75-92.3), with an average of three misoprostol doses. Most participants expelled the fetus and the placenta at or around the same time; median time between fetal and placental expulsion was 15 minutes (range: 0-4.5 h). Fifteen participants (6.6%) received more than five misoprostol doses and were transferred to inpatient care. Administration of more than five doses of misoprostol was associated with nulliparity. Provision of antibiotics (27.9%, n = 64), manual removal of placenta (15.3%, n = 35), uterotonics (4.4%, n = 10) and surgical interventions (4.4%, n = 10) were also reported. About one in four participants experienced nausea, vomiting and chills; fever was infrequent (2.5%, n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: For gestations 13-18 weeks, an outpatient day process for medication abortion is safe, effective and feasible. IMPLICATIONS: Medication abortion in 13 - 18 weeks need not be limited to inpatient care; nine of ten cases can be managed as an outpatient day service.


Assuntos
Abortivos não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Abortivos Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Mifepristona/administração & dosagem , Misoprostol/administração & dosagem , Abortivos não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Abortivos Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Aborto Induzido/efeitos adversos , Aborto Induzido/métodos , Aborto Induzido/enfermagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mifepristona/efeitos adversos , Misoprostol/efeitos adversos , Nepal , Gravidez , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA