The cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis medications for preventing periprosthetic fractures following femoral neck fracture indicated hip arthroplasty: a break-even analysis.

Osteoporosis treatment following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF) is associated with lower rates of periprosthetic fracture (PPF). Our study evaluated the economic viability of treatment in patients following arthroplasty and demonstrates that treatment with oral bisphosphonates can be cost-effective in preventing PPF. INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis treatment following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF) is associated with lower rates of periprosthetic fracture (PPF). Although cost-effective in reducing the rate of secondary fragility fracture, the economic viability of osteoporosis treatment in preventing PPF has not been evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to use a break-even analysis to determine whether and which current osteoporosis medications are cost-effective in preventing PPF following arthroplasty for FNFs. METHODS: Three-year average cost of osteoporosis medication (oral bisphosphonates, estrogen hormonal therapy, intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide, and abaloparatide), costs of PPF care, and PPF rates in patients who underwent hip arthroplasty for FNFs without osteoporosis treatment were used to perform a break-even analysis. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) related to osteoporosis treatment and sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this intervention and break-even PPF rates. RESULTS: Oral bisphosphonate therapy following arthroplasty for hip fractures would be economically justified if it prevents one out of 56 PPFs (ARR, 1.8%). Given the current cost and incidence of PPF, overall treatment can only be economically viable for PPF prophylaxis if the 3-year costs of these agents are less than $1500. CONCLUSION: The utilization of lower cost osteoporosis medications such as oral bisphosphonates and estrogen hormonal therapy as PPF prophylaxis in this patient population would be economically viable if they reduce the PPF rate by 1.8% and 1.5%, respectively. For IV bisphosphonates and newer agents to be economically viable as PPF prophylaxis in the USA, their costs need to be significantly reduced.

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared with low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after surgical resection of primary lower extremity bone or soft-tissue sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and wound complications is greater after sarcoma resection. We sought to identify differences in postoperative VTE and bleeding complications with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) following resection of lower extremity primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 2083 patients from the PearlDiver database who underwent resection of primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma of the lower extremity from January 2010 to October 2021 and prescribed LMWH or DOAC within 90-days postoperatively. The primary outcomes were comparison of postoperative incidence and odds of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and bleeding complications within 90-days following resection. RESULTS: Patients prescribed DOACs had a greater odds of DVT (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-2.41; p = 0.024) and PE (OR: 3.38; 95% CI: 1.96-5.86; p < 0.001) within 90-days following resection of bone sarcoma when compared with the LMWH cohort. Patients undergoing resection of soft tissue sarcomas also had greater odds DVT (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.09-2.49; p = 0.016) and PE (OR: 2.62; 95% CI: 1.52-4.54; p < 0.001) in the DOAC cohort. There was no difference in the odds of bleeding complications. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated an increased incidence and odds of VTE, but not bleeding complications, when using DOACs versus LMWH after primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma resection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

No Difference in 10-Year Survivorship of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Avascular Necrosis of the Humeral Head.

INTRODUCTION: Avascular necrosis of the humeral head (AVN) is characterized by osteonecrosis secondary to disrupted blood flow to the glenohumeral joint. Following collapse of the humeral head, arthroplasty, namely total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or humeral head arthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty) is recommended standard of care. The literature is limited to underpowered and small sample sizes in comparing arthroplasty modalities. Therefore, the aims of this study were (1) to compare the 10-year survivorship of TSA and hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of AVN of the humeral head and (2) to identify differences in their revision etiologies. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary TSA and hemiarthroplasty for AVN were identified using the PearlDiver database. TSA patients were matched by age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to the hemiarthroplasty cohort in a 4:1 ratio since TSA patients were generally older, sicker, and more often female. The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of all-cause revision was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox Proportional Hazard modeling. Chi-squared analysis was conducted to compare the indications for revisions between matched cohorts including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), dislocation, mechanical loosening, broken implants, periprosthetic fracture, and stiffness. RESULTS: In total, 4,825 patients undergoing TSA and 1,969 patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for AVN were included in this study. The unmatched 10-year cumulative incidence of revision for patients who underwent TSA and hemiarthroplasty was 7.0% and 7.7%, respectively. The matched 10-year cumulative incidence of revision for patients who underwent TSA and hemiarthroplasty was 6.7% and 8.0%, respectively. When comparing the unmatched cohorts, TSA patients were at significantly higher risk of 10-year all-cause revision (HR: 1.39; P = 0.017) when compared to hemiarthroplasty patients. After matching, there was no significant difference in risk of 10-year all-cause revision (HR: 1.29; P = 0.148) and no difference in the observed etiologies for revision (P > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: After controlling for confounders, only 6.7% of TSA and 8.0% hemiarthroplasties for humeral head AVN were revised within 10-years of index surgery. The demonstrated high and comparable long-term survivorship for both modalities supports the utilization of either for the AVN induced humeral head collapse.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Within 6 Weeks of Proximal Humerus Fracture is Associated with the Lowest Risk of Revision.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become an increasingly popular treatment strategy in the management of complex proximal humeral fractures (PHF). However, no definitive consensus has been reached regarding the optimal surgical timing of RTSA following PHF, particularly considering nonoperative management is often a viable option. Therefore, the aim of this study was (1) to identify optimal timing intervals that maximize the likelihood of revision following RTSA and (2) to determine differences in revision etiologies using the identified timing intervals. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing PHF-indicated RTSA from 2010 to 2021 was conducted using a national administrative claims database. Stratum specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) analysis was conducted to determine data-driven timing strata between PHF and RTSA that maximized the likelihood of revision surgery within 2-years of RTSA. To control for confounders, multivariable regression analysis was conducted to confirm the identified data-driven strata's association with 2-year revision rates as well as compare the likelihood of various indications for revision including mechanical loosening, dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and periprosthetic fracture (PPF). RESULTS: In total, 11,707 patients undergoing TSA following PHF were included in this study. SSLR analysis identified two timing categories: 0-6 weeks and 7-52 weeks from the time of PHF to TSA surgery. Relative to the 0-6 week cohort, the 7-52 week cohort was more likely to undergo revision surgery within 2-years (OR: 1.93, P < 0.001). Moreover, the 7-52 week cohort had significantly higher odds of revision indicated for dislocation (OR: 2.24, P < 0.001), mechanical loosening (OR: 1.71, P < 0.001), PJI (OR: 1.74, P < 0.001), and PPF (OR: 1.96, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using SSLR, we were successful in identifying two data-driven timing strata between PHF and RTSA that maximized the likelihood of 2-year revision surgery. As it can be difficult to determine whether RTSA or nonoperative management is initially more appropriate, considering the results of this study, an early trial of 4 to 6 weeks of nonoperative management may be appropriate without altering the risks associated with RTSA.

Osteoporosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Higher 5-Year Implant-Related Complications.

BACKGROUND: The risk of revision surgery in patients who have osteoporosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is understudied. Our aim was to compare the 5-year cumulative risk of revision surgery after TKA in patients who have preoperative osteoporosis. METHODS: A national administrative claims database was queried for patients undergoing primary TKA from 2010 to 2021. There were 418,054 patients included, and 41,760 (10%) had osteoporosis. The 5-year incidence of revision surgery was examined for all-causes, periprosthetic fracture (PPF), aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards models. Hazards ratios (HRs) were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The 5-year rate of all-cause revision surgery was higher for patients who had osteoporosis (HR 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0 to 1.2), however, the highest risk of revision surgery was seen for PPF (HR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.6 to 2.1). Patients who had osteoporosis also had elevated risk of revision surgery for PJI (HR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.3) and aseptic loosening (HR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.3). Osteoporosis was independently associated with PJI and aseptic loosening at a higher rate in obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: In unadjusted survival analysis, those who had osteoporosis have a marginally lower risk of all-cause revision surgery. However, after controlling for age, sex and comorbidities, patients who had osteoporosis have a nearly 2-fold increased risk of 5-year revision for PPF after TKA, and mildly increased risk of revision for all causes, aseptic loosening, and PJI. Obesity may also modulate this association. Future studies should determine the extent to which treatment of osteoporosis modifies these postoperative outcomes.

Trends in Venous Thromboembolism and Chemoprophylaxis Utilization in Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty From 2011 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a feared complication of joint arthroplasty, leading to recent clinical practice guidelines aimed at VTE prevention and prophylaxis. However, limited studies have examined national changes in practice regarding chemoprophylaxis and the resultant changes in VTE rates. The purpose of this study was to identify: (1) the temporal trends in thrombotic complications; and (2) changes in chemoprophylaxis utilization in patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using a large all-payer claims dataset. Patients who underwent osteoarthritis-indicated TKA between 2011 and 2020 were identified. Annual rates of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, within 90 days of TKA were determined. Utilization patterns for postoperative aspirin and anticoagulant medications were observed. Temporal trends were analyzed with linear regression and the calculation of the cumulative annual growth rate. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to account for the effects of age and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 1,263,351 TKA patients were identified between 2011 and 2020. There were significant reductions in VTE rates (2.9% in 2011 to 1.8% in 2020), deep vein thrombosis rates (2.0% in 2011 to 1.3% in 2020), and pulmonary embolism rates (1.1% in 2011 to 0.6% in 2020). Postoperative utilization of aspirin increased from 5.9% in 2011 to 53.2% in 2020, whereas utilization of anticoagulants decreased from 94.1% in 2011 to 46.8% in 2020. Among anticoagulants, direct factor Xa inhibitors had the greatest increase in utilization (4.6 to 69.7%). The average reimbursement associated with VTE after TKA decreased from $18,061 in 2011 to $7,835 in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate and economic burden of VTE after TKA have significantly declined since 2011. There has been a trend toward increased aspirin and direct oral anticoagulant utilization for postoperative chemoprophylaxis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Have a Similar 5-Year Cumulative Incidence Rate of Periprosthetic Fracture Regardless of Cemented Versus Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation.

BACKGROUND: In osteoporotic patients, surgeons may utilize cemented femoral fixation to minimize risk of fracture. The purpose of this study was to compare 5-year implant survivability in patients who have osteoporosis who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) with cementless versus cemented fixation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who have osteoporosis undergoing THA with either cemented or cementless femoral fixation was conducted using a national administrative claims database. Of the 18,431 identified THA patients who have osteoporosis, 15,867 (86.1%) underwent cementless fixation. The primary outcome was a comparison of the 5-year cumulative incidences of aseptic revision, mechanical loosening, and periprosthetic fracture (PPF). Kaplan-Meier and Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazard Ratio analyses were used, controlling for femoral fixation method, age, sex, a comorbidity scale, use of osteoporosis medication, and important comorbidity. RESULTS: There was no difference in aseptic revision (Hazard's Ratio (HR): 1.13; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.79 to 1.62; P value: .500) and PPF (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.44; P value: .858) within 5 years of THA between fixation cohorts. However, patients who had cemented fixation were more likely to suffer mechanical loosening with 5 years post-THA (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.17 to 2.71; P-value: .007). CONCLUSIONS: We found a similar 5-year rate of PPF when comparing patients who underwent cementless versus cemented femoral fixation for elective THA regardless of preoperative diagnosis of osteoporosis. While existing registry data support the use of cemented fixation in elderly patients, a more thorough understanding of the interplay between age, osteoporosis, and implant design is needed to delineate in whom cemented fixation is most warranted for PPF prevention.

The Creation of Data-Driven Preoperative Hemoglobin A1c and Same-Day Glucose Strata to Stratify Complication Risk Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study identifies data-driven strata for preoperative Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and same-day glucose levels that maximize differences in the likelihood of complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Patients who underwent THA from 2013 to 2022 were identified using a national database. In total, 18,728 patients were identified with a mean age of 67 years (range, 18 to 80). Stratum specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) analysis determined separate strata for HbA1c and same-day glucose levels that minimized the likelihood of 90-day complications following THA. Each stratum was propensity-score matched based on age, sex, hypertension, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obesity to the lowest respective stratum. The risk ratio (RR) with respect to the lowest matched stratum was observed. RESULTS: Our SSLR analysis identified 3 data-driven HbA1c strata (4.5 to 5.9, 6.0 to 6.9, and 7.0+) and two same-day glucose strata (60 to 189 and 190+) that predicted 90-day major complications. For HbA1c, when compared to the lowest strata (4.5 to 5.9), the risk of 90-day major complications sequentially increased as the HbA1c strata increased: 6.0 to 6.9 (RR: 1.21; P = .041), 7+ (RR: 1.82; P < .001). For same-day glucose, when compared to the matched lowest strata (60 to 189), the risk of 90-day major complications was higher for the 190+ strata (RR: 1.5; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of multiple HbA1c strata that can be incorporated into preoperative risk-stratification models. Additionally, we identified a single cut-off level of 190 as a maximum target blood glucose level perioperatively.

The Association Between Oral Bone Mineral Density-Reducing Medications and the Risk of 2-Year Implant-Related Complications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Certain medications interfere with the bone remodeling process and may potentially increase the risk of complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As patients undergoing TKA may be taking these bone mineral density (BMD)-reducing medications, it is unclear as to whether and which medications impact TKA outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to observe the impact of various BMD-reducing medications on 2-year implant-related complications following TKA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing primary TKA was conducted using a national administrative claims database. Patients were identified if they were taking any known BMD-reducing medication and were compared to control patients. To control for confounders associated with taking multiple agents, multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted for each 2-year outcome (all-cause revision, loosening-indicated revision, and periprosthetic fracture--indicated revision), with the output recorded as odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: In our study, 502,927 of 1,276,209 TKA patients (39.4%) were taking at least one BMD-reducing medication perioperatively. On multivariable analysis, medications associated with a higher likelihood of 2-year all-cause revision included first- and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) (OR: 1.42 and 1.26, respectively), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (OR: 1.14), glucocorticoids (1.13), and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (OR: 1.23) (P < .05 for all). Medications associated with a higher likelihood of 2-year periprosthetic fracture included SGAs (OR: 1.51), SSRIs (OR: 1.27), aromatase inhibitors (OR: 1.29), and PPIs (OR: 1.42) (P < .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Of the drug classes observed, the utilization of perioperative PPIs, SSRIs, glucocorticoids, first-generation antipsychotics, and SGAs was associated with the highest odds of all-cause revision. Our findings suggest a relationship between these medications and BMD-related complications; however, further studies should seek to determine the causality of these relationships.

Trends in Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Utilization Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty From 2010 to 2022.

BACKGROUND: In patients considered high-risk for infection, extended oral antibiotic (EOA) prophylaxis has been demonstrated to reduce rates of prosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although national guidelines regarding their use have not yet been created, the increase in literature surrounding EOA prophylaxis suggests a potential change in practice patterns. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends in utilization of EOA prophylaxis following THA from 2010 to 2022 and identify prescription patterns. METHODS: A total of 646,059 primary THA and 51,879 aseptic revision THA patients were included in this study. Patients who underwent primary or aseptic revision THA between 2010 and 2022 were identified in a national administrative claims database. Rates and duration of EOA prescriptions were calculated. A secondary analysis examined rates of utilization across demographics, including patients considered high risk for infection. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2022, utilization of EOA increased by 366% and 298% following primary and revision THA, respectively. Of patients prescribed postoperative antibiotics, 30% and 59% were prescribed antibiotics for more than 7 days following primary and revision THA, respectively. Rates of utilization were similar between high-risk individuals and the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of utilization of EOA prophylaxis after THA have increased significantly since 2010. As current trends demonstrate a wide variation in prescription patterns, including in length of antibiotic duration and in patient population prescribed, guidelines surrounding the use of EOA prophylaxis after THA are necessary to promote antibiotic stewardship while preventing rates of periprosthetic joint infection.

No Difference in Revision Rates up to 10 years Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Had Prior Bariatric Surgery When Compared to Patients Who Had Class III Obesity: A Propensity Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear research showcasing bariatric surgery's (BS's) impact on long-term surgical complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, this study compared the 10-year cumulative incidence and risk of revision following THA in patients who underwent BS when compared to the general population and class III obesity patients who did not undergo BS. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective THA from 2010 to 2021 were identified using an all-payer claims database. Patients who underwent BS prior to THA were separately matched to a control of the general population and those who had class III obesity (body mass index ≥40) by age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and diabetes using a 1:4 ratio. Kaplan-Meier analyses generated 10-year cumulative incidence rates, and a Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) model generated HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: When compared to the general control, patients who have a history of BS had an elevated 10-year risk of all-cause revision (HR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.47, P < .001), prosthetic joint infection (HR: 1.62, CI: 1.30 to 2.04; P < .001), mechanical loosening (HR: 1.20, CI: 1.01 to 1.44; P = .040), and dislocation/instability (HR: 1.35, CI: 1.09 to 1.68; P = .007). There was no difference in the 10-year risk of all-cause revision or other indications for revision in the BS cohort compared to the matched class III obesity cohort (P = .142). CONCLUSIONS: Those who underwent BS before THA had comparable 10-year revision rates when compared to those who had class III obesity and higher rates compared to the general population. This suggests BS may not reduce the 10-year surgical risks associated with obesity when compared to a class III obese surgical population.

Patients Who Have Prior Solid Organ Transplants Have Increased Risk of 10-Year Periprosthetic Joint Infection Revision Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for solid organ transplant (SOT) patients is becoming more prominent as life expectancy in this population increases. However, data on long-term (10 year) implant survivorship in this cohort are sparse. The purpose of this study was to compare 90-day, 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year implant survivability following primary TKA in patients who did and did not have prior SOT. METHODS: The PearlDiver database was utilized to query patients who underwent unilateral elective TKA with at least 2 years of active follow-up. These patients were stratified into those who had a SOT before TKA and those who did not. The SOT cohort was propensity-matched to control patients based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and obesity in a 1:2 ratio. Cumulative incidence rates and hazard ratios (HRs) were compared between the SOT, matched, and unmatched cohorts. RESULTS: No difference was observed in 10-year cumulative incidence and risk of all-cause revision surgery in TKA patients with prior SOT when compared to matched and unmatched controls. Compared to the matched control, the SOT cohort had no difference in the risk of revision when stratified by indication and timing. However, when compared to the unmatched control, patients who had prior SOT had a higher risk for revision due to periprosthetic joint infection at 10 years (HR: 1.80; 95% confidence interval: 1.17 to 2.76) as well as all-cause revision within 90 days after TKA (HR: 1.93; 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 3.36). CONCLUSIONS: Prior SOT patients have higher rates of all-cause revision within 90 days and periprosthetic joint infection within 10 years when compared to the general population, likely associated with the elevated number of comorbidities in SOT patients and not the transplant itself. Therefore, these patients should be monitored in the preoperative and early postoperative settings to optimize their known comorbidities.

Chronic Oral Corticosteroid Use and 10-Year Incidence of Major Complications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Oral corticosteroids are the primary treatment for several autoimmune conditions. The risk of long-term implant, bone health, and infectious-related complications in patients taking chronic oral corticosteroids before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is unknown. We compared the 10-year cumulative incidence of revision, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), fragility fracture (FF), and periprosthetic fracture following TKA in patients who had and did not have preoperative chronic oral corticosteroid use. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a national database. Primary TKA patients who had chronic preoperative oral corticosteroid use were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Disease 9 and 10 codes. Exclusion criteria included malignancy, osteoporosis treatment, trauma, and < 2-year follow-up. Primary outcomes were 10-year cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause revision (ACR), aseptic revision, PJI, FF, and periprosthetic fracture. A Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were utilized. Overall, 611,596 patients were identified, and 5,217 (0.85%) were prescribed chronic corticosteroids. There were 10,000 control patients randomly sampled for analysis. RESULTS: Corticosteroid patients had significantly higher 10-year HR of FF (HR; 95% confidence interval); P value (1.47; 1.34 to 1.62; P < .001)], ACR (1.21; 1.05 to 1.40; P = .009), and PJI (1.30; 1.01 to 1.69; P = .045) when compared to the control. CONCLUSIONS: Patients prescribed preoperative chronic oral corticosteroids had higher risks of ACR, PJI, and FF within 10 years following TKA compared to patients not taking corticosteroids. This information can be used by surgeons during preoperative counseling to educate this high-risk patient population about their increased risk of postoperative complications.

Trends in anti-osteoporotic medication utilization following fragility fracture in the USA from 2011 to 2019.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there has been any change in osteoporosis treatment following primary fragility fractures and what agents were being given. The study found an overall low utilization rate with no difference in treatment utilization from 2011 to 2019. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to describe trends in the utilization of anti-osteoporotic medication after fragility fracture, including changes in the specific types of medications prescribed. METHODS: Patients older than 65 with fragility fractures sustained from 2011 to 2019 were identified in the PearlDiver Patient Records Database. Osteoporosis treatment rate was defined as the rate at which patients were prescribed any of the fourteen most used anti-osteoporotic medications within 1 year of fragility fracture. Fragility fractures were subcategorized by type. Treatment of fragility fractures was further stratified by patient demographics (age and gender) and medication type. RESULTS: This study showed an overall osteoporosis treatment rate of 8.01%, with treatment rates of 6.87% following hip fractures, 6.71% following upper extremity fractures, and 14.38% following vertebral compression fractures (VCF). From 2011 to 2018, there was no change in the overall fragility fracture treatment rate (p = 0.32). Of the three fracture categories analyzed, only the treatment rate for VCFs increased (p = 0.048). Osteoporosis treatment in patients with VCF increased among patients 65-74 years old (p < 0.05) and male patients (p = 0.013). Treatment in patients with upper extremity fractures increased among patients 70-74 years old (p = 0.038). Bisphosphonates were the most frequently prescribed class of medications. Bisphosphonates and denosumab increased in utilization (p = 0.049 and p < 0.001 respectively) while calcitonin utilization decreased (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Besides the overall low utilization rate of osteoporosis treatment in patients following fragility fractures, there has been no change in the treatment utilization rate within the past decade. More resources and interventions need to be enforced for all providers managing these patients if we are ever to address the osteoporosis epidemic.

The impact of prior fragility fractures on long-term periprosthetic fracture risk following total knee arthroplasty.

The study found that patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with prior fragility fracture had increased risk of subsequent fragility fracture and periprosthetic fracture within 8 years postoperatively when compared to those without a prior history. However, these patients were not at increased risk for all-cause revision within this period. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to characterize the association of prior FFs on long-term risk of secondary fragility fracture (FF), periprosthetic fracture (PPF), and revision TKA. METHODS: Patients at least 50 years of age who underwent elective TKA were identified in the PearlDiver Database. Patients were stratified based on whether they sustained a FF within 3 years prior to TKA (7410 patients) or not (712,954 patients). Demographics and comorbidities were collected. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to observe the cumulative incidence of all-cause revision, PPF, and secondary FF within 8 years of TKA. Cox Proportional hazard ratio analysis was used to statistically compare the risk. RESULTS: In total, 1.0% of patients had a FF within three years of TKA. Of these patients, only 22.6% and 10.9% had a coded diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteopenia, respectively, at time of TKA. The 8-year cumulative incidence of secondary FF and periprosthetic fracture was significantly higher in those with a prior FF (27.5% secondary FF and 1.9% PPF) when compared to those without (9.1% secondary FF and 0.7% PPF). After adjusting for covariates, patients with a recent FF had significantly higher risks of secondary FF (HR 2.73; p < 0.001) and periprosthetic fracture (HR 1.86; p < 0.001) than those without a recent FF. CONCLUSIONS: Recent FF before TKA is associated with increased risk for additional FF and PPF within 8 years following TKA. Surgeons should ensure appropriate management of fragility fracture is undertaken prior to TKA to minimize fracture risk, and if not, be vigilant to identify patients with prior FF or other bone health risk factors who may have undocumented osteoporosis.

Can Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Surgeons Help Address the Osteoporosis Epidemic?

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a known, modifiable risk factor for lower extremity periprosthetic fractures. Unfortunately, a high percentage of patients at risk of osteoporosis who undergo THA or TKA do not receive routine screening and treatment for osteoporosis, but there is insufficient information determining the proportion of patients undergoing THA and TKA who should be screened and their implant-related complications. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of patients in a large database who underwent THA or TKA met the criteria for osteoporosis screening? (2) What proportion of these patients received a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) study before arthroplasty? (3) What was the 5-year cumulative incidence of fragility fracture or periprosthetic fracture after arthroplasty of those at high risk compared with those at low risk of osteoporosis? METHODS: Between January 2010 and October 2021, 710,097 and 1,353,218 patients who underwent THA and TKA, respectively, were captured in the Mariner dataset of the PearlDiver database. We used this dataset because it longitudinally tracks patients across a variety of insurance providers throughout the United States to provide generalizable data. Patients at least 50 years old with at least 2 years of follow-up were included, and patients with a diagnosis of malignancy and fracture-indicated total joint arthroplasty were excluded. Based on this initial criterion, 60% (425,005) of THAs and 66% (897,664) of TKAs were eligible. A further 11% (44,739) of THAs and 11% (102,463) of TKAs were excluded because of a prior diagnosis of or treatment for osteoporosis, leaving 54% (380,266) of THAs and 59% (795,201) of TKAs for analysis. Patients at high risk of osteoporosis were filtered using demographic and comorbidity information provided by the database and defined by national guidelines. The proportion of patients at high risk of osteoporosis who underwent osteoporosis screening via DEXA scan within 3 years was observed, and the 5-year cumulative incidence of periprosthetic fractures and fragility fracture was compared between the high-risk and low-risk cohorts. RESULTS: In total, 53% (201,450) and 55% (439,982) of patients who underwent THA and TKA, respectively, were considered at high risk of osteoporosis. Of these patients, 12% (24,898 of 201,450) and 13% (57,022 of 439,982) of patients who underwent THA and TKA, respectively, received a preoperative DEXA scan. Within 5 years, patients at high risk of osteoporosis undergoing THA and TKA had a higher cumulative incidence of fragility fractures (THA: HR 2.1 [95% CI 1.9 to 2.2]; TKA: HR 1.8 [95% CI 1.7 to 1.9]) and periprosthetic fractures (THA: HR 1.7 [95% CI 1.5 to 1.8]; TKA: HR 1.6 [95% CI 1.4 to 1.7]) than those at low risk (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: We attribute the higher rates of fragility and periprosthetic fractures in those at high risk compared with those at low risk to an occult diagnosis of osteoporosis. Hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons can help reduce the incidence and burden of these osteoporosis-related complications by initiating screening and subsequently referring patients to bone health specialists for treatment. Future studies might investigate the proportion of osteoporosis in patients at high risk of having the condition, develop and evaluate practical bone health screening and treatment algorithms for hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons, and observe the cost-effectiveness of implementing these algorithms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Delay of Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Associated With Lower Risk of Arthrofibrosis Requiring Intervention.

PURPOSE: To conduct 2 separate stratum-specific likelihood ratio analyses in patients younger than 40 year of age (<40 years) and those aged 40 and older (40+ years) at time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to define data-driven strata between ACL tear and primary isolated ACL reconstruction in which the risk of arthrofibrosis, using manipulation under anesthesia and arthroscopic lysis of adhesions as surrogates, is significantly different. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the PearlDiver Database. Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were identified using the Current Procedure Terminology code 29888. Patients were stratified to those aged younger than 40 (<40) and those 40 and older (40+) at time of ACL reconstruction. The incidence of 2-year arthrofibrosis was calculated for weekly intervals from initial ACL injury to reconstruction. Stratum specific likelihood ratio analysis was conducted to determine data-driven intervals from initial ACL tear to reconstruction that optimize differences in 2-year arthrofibrosis. Following the identification of these intervals for both those <40 and 40+, multivariable analysis was conducted. RESULTS: For those <40, stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis identified only 2 data-driven timing strata: 0-5 and 6-26 weeks. For those 40+, stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis also only identified 2 data-driven strata: 0-9 and 10-26 weeks. A delay in ACL reconstruction from initial injury by at least 6 weeks in patients younger than 40 and at least 10 weeks in patients older than 40 years is associated with a 65% and 35% reduction of 2-year manipulation under anesthesia and arthroscopic lysis of adhesions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed a delay in ACLR of at least 6 weeks in patients younger than 40 years to be associated with a 65% reduction in the risk of surgical intervention for arthrofibrosis and a delay of at least 10 weeks in patients 40 years and older to be associated with only a 35% reduction in the risk of surgical intervention for arthrofibrosis. The authors propose this difference in reduction to be multifactorial and potentially associated with mechanism of injury, activity level, and preoperative factors such as amount of physical therapy, rather than solely timing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic study.

Higher revision rates in patients with preoperative contralateral pes planovalgus deformity following total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of revision in those with pes planovalgus deformity to those without using a large national database. Given the reciprocal changes in lower extremity alignment associated with planovalgus foot deformity, it has been suggested that patients with this deformity has worse outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing elective TKA was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients were stratified into three cohorts: those without pes planovalgus, patients with ipsilateral or bilateral pes planovalgus relative to the TKA, and patients with contralateral pes planovalgus. Patients with prior foot reconstructive surgery were excluded. The cohorts were each matched to those without pes planovalgus. Bivariate analysis was performed comparing 90-day medical complications and 2- and 4-year revisions following TKA. An adjusted number needed to be exposed for one additional person to be harmed (NNEH) was calculated using the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and unexposed event rate. RESULTS: Following matched analysis, those with contralateral pes planovalgus had similar odds (OR 3.41; 95% CI 0.93-12.54; p = n.s.) for aseptic revision within 2 years but significantly higher odds (OR 3.35; 95% CI 1.08-10.41; p = 0.03) within 4 years when compared to those without a pes planovalgus deformity. Within 4 years, there was no significant difference in the incidence of aseptic revision (p = n.s.) in patients with ipsilateral/bilateral pes planovalgus. No patients in any cohort underwent septic revision within 4 years of TKA. CONCLUSION: This study found that patients with contralateral pes planovalgus deformity had higher odds of aseptic revision within 4 years following primary TKA in a national database, suggesting that the change in gait kinematics associated with this deformity could possibly be associated with increased revision rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Obesity does not associate with 5-year surgical complications following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although obesity has been shown to increase the risk of short-term medical complications following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), evidence is lacking on the influence of obesity on longer-term surgical complications such as revision. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of increasing obesity with 2- and 5-year all-cause revision, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), aseptic loosening, and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) among patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) or TSA. METHODS: Patients who underwent RTSA or TSA with a minimum 5-year follow-up were identified in a national claims database (PearlDiver Technologies). Patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥30) were compared to patients who are normal or overweight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 30). Those with obesity were further stratified to those with class I or II obesity (30 ≤ BMI < 40) and those with class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40). Outcomes for comparison included all-cause revision, PJI, aseptic loosening, and MUA within 2 or 5 years. These cohorts were compared using univariate and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Patients with obesity had no significant difference in any surgical complication within 2 or 5 years for both those who underwent TSA or RTSA. After stratifying by class I or II obesity and class III obesity, there was still no significant difference in surgical complications with 2 or 5 years for both TSA patients and RTSA patients. DISCUSSION: Obesity, when other major comorbidities are controlled for, was not associated with increased risk of long-term surgical complications after shoulder replacement surgery.

Social determinants of health and race are independent predictors of reduced rotator cuff surgery rates in the Medicare population.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities have been shown to influence rates of surgery for patients with rotator cuff disease. Some individuals have attributed adverse social determinants of health (SDOHs) as potential confounders of this relationship between race and surgery rate. However, there is a paucity of literature observing whether adverse SDOHs and race independently influence rotator cuff surgery rates. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether adverse SDOHs and race are independent predictors of rotator cuff surgery rates for Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducting using the Medicare Standard Analytic Files (SAF) data set of the PearlDiver database, observing 211,340 patients with rotator cuff pathology. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to observe whether race and adverse SDOHs were independent variables associated with rotator cuff surgery rates. To determine whether adverse SDOHs significantly influenced racial disparities, stratified analyses of patients with ≥1 adverse SDOH and those without adverse SDOHs were conducted to compare the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of racial disparities. RESULTS: Among patients with rotator cuff disease, 21,679 (10.26%) were of nonwhite race and 21,835 (10.33%) had ≥1 adverse SDOH. The variables of nonwhite race (OR, 0.622; 95% CI, 0.599-0.668; P < .001) and having ≥1 adverse SDOH (OR, 0.715; 95% CI, 0.501-0.814; P < .001) were independent predictors of not undergoing surgery. On stratified analysis, there was no significant difference in racial disparities in patients with ≥1 adverse SDOH (OR, 0.620; 95% CI, 0.440-0.875) and those without adverse SDOHs (0.635; 95% CI, 0.601-0.671) based on overlapping 95% CIs. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that among Medicare beneficiaries, adverse SDOHs and race are independent predictors of lower rotator cuff surgery rates, emphasizing the need to address disparities based on race alone.