Effect of linagliptin plus insulin in comparison to insulin alone on metabolic control and prognosis in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

To evaluate the effect of the combination of linagliptin and insulin on metabolic control and prognosis in hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and hyperglycemia. A parallel double-blind randomized clinical trial including hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and hyperglycemia, randomized to receive 5 mg linagliptin + insulin (LI group) or insulin alone (I group) was performed. The main outcomes were the need for assisted mechanical ventilation and glucose levels during hospitalization. Subjects were screened for eligibility at hospital admission if they were not with assisted mechanical ventilation and presented hyperglycemia, and a total of 73 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and hyperglycemia were randomized to the LI group (n = 35) or I group (n = 38). The average hospital stay was 12 ± 1 vs 10 ± 1 days for the I and LI groups, respectively (p = 0.343). There were no baseline clinical differences between the study groups, but the percentage of males was higher in the LI group (26 vs 18, p = 0.030). The improvements in fasting and postprandial glucose levels were better in the LI group that the I group (122 ± 7 vs 149 ± 10, p = 0.033; and 137 ± 7 vs 173 ± 12, p = 0.017, respectively), and insulin requirements tended to be lower in the LI group than the I group. Three patients in the LI group and 12 in the I group required assisted mechanical ventilation (HR 0.258, CI 95% 0.092-0.719, p = 0.009); 2 patients in the LI group and 6 in the I group died after a follow-up of 30 days (p = 0.139). No major side effects were observed. The combination of linagliptin and insulin in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and hyperglycemia reduced the relative risk of assisted mechanical ventilation by 74% and improved better pre and postprandial glucose levels with lower insulin requirements, and no higher risk of hypoglycemia.This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT04542213 on 09/03/2020.

Effect of linagliptin on glucose metabolism and pancreatic beta cell function in patients with persistent prediabetes after metformin and lifestyle.

The goal of the study was to evaluate the effect of adding linagliptin to metformin and lifestyle on glucose levels and pancreatic ß-cell function in patients with persistent impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) after 12 months of metformin and lifestyle. A single center parallel double-blind randomized clinical trial with 6 months of follow-up was performed in patients with persistent IGT after 12 months of treatment with metformin and lifestyle; patients were randomized to continue with metformin 850 mg twice daily (M group, n = 12) or linagliptin/metformin 2.5/850 mg twice daily (LM group, n = 19). Anthropometric measurements were obtained by standard methods and by bioelectrical impedance; glucose was measured by dry chemistry, insulin by chemiluminescence, and pancreatic ß-cell function was calculated with the disposition index using glucose and insulin values during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and adjusting by insulin sensitivity. The main outcomes were glucose levels during OGTT and pancreatic ß-cell function. Patients in the LM group had a reduction in weight (-1.7 ± 0.6, p < 0.05) and body mass index (BMI, -0.67 ± 0.2, p < 0.05). Glucose levels significantly improved in LM group with a greater reduction in the area under the glucose curve during OGTT (AUCGluc0_120min) as compared to the M group (-4425 ± 871 vs -1116 ± 1104 mg/dl/120 min, p < 0.001). Pancreatic ß-cell function measured with the disposition index, improved only in LM group (2.3 ± 0.23 vs 1.7 ± 0.27, p 0.001); these improvements persisted after controlling for OGTT glucose levels. The differences in pancreatic ß-cell function persisted also after pairing groups for basal AUCGluc0_120min. The addition of linagliptin to patients with persistent IGT after 12 months of treatment with metformin and lifestyle, improved glucose levels during OGTT and pancreatic ß-cell function after 6 months of treatment.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov with the ID number NCT04088461.

The combination of linagliptin, metformin and lifestyle modification to prevent type 2 diabetes (PRELLIM). A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Prediabetes is a highly prevalent health problem with a high risk of complications and progression to type 2 diabetes (T2D). The goals of this study were to evaluate the effect of the combination of lingaliptin + metformin + lifestyle on glucose tolerance, pancreatic ß-cell function and T2D incidence in patients with prediabetes. METHODS: A single center parallel double-blind randomized clinical trial with 24 months of follow-up in patients with impaired glucose tolerance plus two T2D risk factors which were randomized to linagliptin 5 mg + metformin 1700 mg daily + lifestyle (LM group) or metformin 1700 mg daily + lifestyle (M group). Primary outcomes were regression to normoglycemia and T2D incidence; glucose levels and pancreatic ß-cell function were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Subjects were screened for eligibility by OGTT and 144 patients with prediabetes were randomized to LM group (n = 74) or M group (n = 70); 52 and 36 participants in the LM group and 52 and 27 participants in the M group, completed the 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively; average follow-up was 17 ±â€¯6 and 18 ±â€¯7 months in M and LM group, respectively. Glucose levels during OGTT improved more in LM group. OGTT disposition index (DI) improved significantly better during the first months in LM group, increasing from 1·31 (95% CI: 1·14-1·49) to 2·41 (95% CI: 2.10-2.72) and to 2.07 (95% CI: 1.82-2.31) at 6 and 24 months in LM group vs from 1.21 (95% CI: 0.98-1.34) to 1.56 (95% CI: 1.17-1.95) and to 1.72 (95% CI: 1.45-1.98) at 6 and 24 months in M group (p < .05). T2D incidence was higher in M group in comparison to LM group (HR 4.0, 95% CI: 1.24-13.04, p = .020). The probability of achieving normoglycemia was higher in LM group (OR 3.26 CI 95% 1.55-6.84). No major side effects were observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of linagliptin, metformin and lifestyle improved significantly glucose metabolism and pancreatic ß-cell function, and reduced T2D incidence in subjects with prediabetes as compared to metformin and lifestyle.

Linagliptin plus insulin for hyperglycemia immediately after renal transplantation: A comparative study.

AIMS: Post-renal-transplanted patients frequently present hyperglycemia immediately after the procedure. The goal of this work was to evaluate the effect of linagliptin + insulin in post-renal-transplanted patients with hyperglycemia. METHODS: Retrospective comparative study in post-renal transplanted patients with hyperglycemia after transplantation who were treated with linagliptin 5 mg daily plus insulin vs insulin alone for 5 days after renal transplantation with hyperglycemia. Main outcomes were glucose levels, insulin dose and severity of hypoglycemia. RESULTS: There were 14 patients treated with linagliptin + insulin and 14 patients treated only with insulin. Glucose levels and insulin doses were lower in the linagliptin + insulin group in comparison with the insulin alone group, 131.0 ±â€¯15.1 vs 191.1 ±â€¯22.5 mg/dl (7.27 ±â€¯0.84 vs 10.61 ±â€¯1.25 mmol/l) and 37.5 ±â€¯6.3 vs 24.2 ±â€¯6.6 U, respectively (p < 0.05). Hypoglycemia was less severe in the linagliptin + insulin group, 65.1 ±â€¯2.2 vs 54.2 ±â€¯3.3 mg/dl (3.61 ±â€¯0.12 vs 3.00 ±â€¯3.3 ±â€¯0.18 mmol/l), p 0.036. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of linagliptin + insulin provided better glycemic control with a lower insulin dose and less severe hypoglycemia in comparison to insulin alone in patients with hyperglycemia immediately after renal transplantation.

Pancreatic ß-cell dysfunction in normoglycemic patients and risk factors.

AIMS: To evaluate pancreatic ß-cell function (ßf) in patients with normoglycemia (NG) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and related risk factors. METHODS: An observational and comparative study in 527 patients with NG and NGT that were divided by quartiles of ßf according to the disposition index derived from OGTT. Anthropometrical, clinical, nutritional, and biochemical variables were measured and associated with ßf. RESULTS: Quartiles of ßf were Q1 = DI < 1.93 n = 131, Q2 = DI 1.93-2.45 n = 134, Q3 = DI 2.46-3.1 n = 133, and Q4 = DI > 3.1 n = 129. There was a progressive reduction in pancreatic ß-cell function and it is negatively correlated with age, weight, BMI, total body fat and visceral fat, waist circumference, total cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides (p < 0.01). Glucose levels during OGTT had a negative correlation with ßf; the product of fasting glucose by 1-h glucose had the best correlation with ßf (r = 0.611, p < 0.001) and was the best predictor of ßdf (AUC 0.816, CI 95% 0.774-0.857), even better than 1-h glucose (r = 0.581, p < 0.001). Energy, fat, and carbohydrate intake were negatively correlated with ßf (p < 0.05). Glucose levels at 1-h OGTT > 110 mg/dl were positively associated with pancreatic ßdf (OR 6.85, CI 95% 3.86-12.4). In the multivariate analysis, glucose levels during OGTT, fasting insulin, and BMI were the main factors associated with ßf. CONCLUSIONS: A subgroup of patients with NG and NGT may have a loss of 40% of their ßf. Factors related to this ßdf were age, adiposity, glucose during OGTT, and the product of fasting and 1-h glucose, as well as food intake.