Age-Related Effects on MSC Immunomodulation, Macrophage Polarization, Apoptosis, and Bone Regeneration Correlate with IL-38 Expression.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are known to promote tissue regeneration and suppress excessive inflammation caused by infection or trauma. Reported evidence indicates that various factors influence the expression of MSCs' endogenous immunomodulatory properties. However, the detailed interactions of MSCs with macrophages, which are key cells involved in tissue repair, and their regulatory mechanisms are not completely understood. We herein investigated how age-related immunomodulatory impairment of MSCs alters the interaction of MSCs with macrophages during bone healing using young (5-week old) and aged (50-week old) mice. To clarify the relationship between inflammatory macrophages (M1) and MSCs, their spatiotemporal localization at the bone healing site was investigated by immunostaining, and possible regulatory mechanisms were analyzed in vitro co-cultures. Histomorphometric analysis revealed an accumulation of M1 and a decrease in MSC number at the healing site in aged mice, which showed a delayed bone healing. In in vitro co-cultures, MSCs induced M1 apoptosis through cell-to-cell contact but suppressed the gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines by soluble factors secreted in the culture supernatant. Interestingly, interleukin 38 (Il-38) expression was up-regulated in M1 after co-culture with MSCs. IL-38 suppressed the gene expression of inflammatory cytokines in M1 and promoted the expression of genes associated with M1 polarization to anti-inflammatory macrophages (M2). IL-38 also had an inhibitory effect on M1 apoptosis. These results suggest that MSCs may induce M1 apoptosis, suppress inflammatory cytokine production by M1, and induce their polarization toward M2. Nevertheless, in aged conditions, the decreased number and immunomodulatory function of MSCs could be associated with a delayed M1 clearance (i.e., apoptosis and/or polarization) and consequent delayed resolution of the inflammatory phase. Furthermore, M1-derived IL-38 may be associated with immunoregulation in the tissue regeneration site.

Individual identification method using samples associated with doping tests: A comparison of mitochondrial and nuclear genetic data.

Doping offenses involve the use or attempted use of any prohibited method or substance as well as substituting samples. Consequently, it has been recommended that short tandem repeat (STR) analysis be used to determine if the doping control samples are from the same athlete. However, it has been recognized that it may be difficult to obtain full STR analysis using negligible amounts of DNA samples. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is characterized by its stability and high cellular copy number. Therefore, mtDNA testing in urine is expected to be used to analyze samples that cannot be analyzed using STR analysis. The objective of this study was to compare mtDNA testing with STR analysis by conducting sensitivity, concordance (whole blood, dried blood spot, and urine), and case-type studies. In sensitivity studies, mtDNA testing exhibited greater sensitivity compared with STR analysis. Concordance studies indicated that all samples were consistent with the mtDNA sequences and STR profiles. Allelic dropout occurred in some urine samples that were examined for STR analysis. Case-type sample studies demonstrated that mtDNA testing could be used to obtain DNA profiles of all the samples tested, including blood, dried blood spots, urine, blood residues on needles, and blood stains. In conclusion, mtDNA testing is valuable for analyzing highly degraded DNA samples, such as urine samples, compared with STR analysis. Urine testing should be performed for the initial testing procedure, because mtDNA is inherited maternally. In situations where the DNA match is detrimental to the athlete, additional blood STR analysis may be required.

Macrophages modulate mesenchymal stem cell function via tumor necrosis factor alpha in tooth extraction model.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and macrophages collaboratively contribute to bone regeneration after injury. However, detailed mechanisms underlying the interaction between MSCs and inflammatory macrophages (M1) remain unclear. A macrophage-depleted tooth extraction model was generated in 5-wk-old female C57BL/6J mice using clodronate liposome (12.5 mg/kg/mouse, intraperitoneally) or saline injection (control) before maxillary first molar extraction. Mice were sacrificed on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 after tooth extraction (n = 4). Regenerated bone volume evaluation of tooth extraction socket (TES) and histochemical analysis of CD80+M1, CD206+M2 (anti-inflammatory macrophages), PDGFRα+MSC, and TNF-α+ cells were performed. In vitro, isolated MSCs with or without TNF-α stimulation (10 ng/mL, 24 h, n = 3) were bulk RNA-sequenced (RNA-Seq) to identify TNF-α stimulation-specific MSC transcriptomes. Day 7 micro-CT and HE staining revealed significantly lower mean bone volume (clodronate vs control: 0.01 mm3 vs 0.02 mm3, p<.0001) and mean percentage of regenerated bone area per total TES in clodronate group (41.97% vs 54.03%, p<.0001). Clodronate group showed significant reduction in mean number of CD80+, TNF-α+, PDGFRα+, and CD80+TNF-α+ cells on day 5 (306.5 vs 558.8, p<.0001; 280.5 vs 543.8, p<.0001; 365.0 vs 633.0, p<.0001, 29.0 vs 42.5, p<.0001), while these cells recovered significantly on day 7 (493.3 vs 396.0, p=.0004; 479.3 vs 384.5, p=.0008; 593.0 vs 473.0, p=.0010, 41.0 vs 32.5, p=.0003). RNA-Seq analysis showed that 15 genes (|log2FC| > 5.0, log2TPM > 5) after TNF-α stimulation were candidates for regulating MSC's immunomodulatory capacity. In vivo, Clec4e and Gbp6 are involved in inflammation and bone formation. Clec4e, Gbp6, and Cxcl10 knockdown increased osteogenic differentiation of MSCs in vitro. Temporal reduction followed by apparent recovery of TNF-α-producing M1 macrophages and MSCs after temporal macrophage depletion suggests that TNF-α activated MSCs during TES healing. In vitro mimicking the effect of TNF-α on MSCs indicated that there are 15 candidate MSC genes for regulation of immunomodulatory capacity.