Influence of the treatment facility volume on the survival of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that a higher hospital volume or physician caseload is associated with better outcomes for complex and uncommon surgical procedures. Similar studies in the medical management of rare diseases such as hematologic cancers are limited. This retrospective, observational study using the US National Cancer Data Base determined the extent to which the number of new non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients treated annually at a treatment facility affected overall survival (OS). METHODS: There were 278,985 patients treated at 1151 facilities from 1998 to 2006. Treatment facilities were classified by quartiles based on the average number of new NHL patients seen annually: quartile 1 (Q1), 2 to 13 patients; quartile 2 (Q2), 14 to 20 patients; quartile 3 (Q3), 21 to 32 patients; and quartile 4 (Q4), 33 or more patients. The outcome of interest was OS according to facility volume. RESULTS: The unadjusted median OS was 61.8 months for Q1, 65.9 months for Q2, 71.4 months for Q3, and 83.6 months for Q4. A multivariate analysis that was adjusted for demographic (sex, age, race, and ethnicity), socioeconomic (income and insurance type), geographic (area of residence), disease-specific (NHL subtype and stage), and facility-specific factors (type and location) showed that the facility volume was associated with OS. Compared with patients at Q4 facilities, patients at lower quartile facilities had higher mortality (hazard ratio for Q3, 1.05 [95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.06]; hazard ratio for Q2, 1.08 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.10]; hazard ratio for Q1, 1.14 [95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.17]). CONCLUSIONS: NHL patients treated at higher volume facilities may survive longer than those treated at lower volume facilities. Further work is needed to understand the mechanisms of these differences and whether volume should be considered in the determination of referrals for NHL patients. Cancer 2016;122:2552-9. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Institutional review of compliance with NCCN guidelines for breast cancer: lessons learned from real-time multidimensional synoptic reporting.

BACKGROUND: Variations exist in compliance with NCCN Guidelines. Prior reports of adherence to NCCN Guidelines contain limitations because of lack of contemporary review and incomplete listing of reasons for noncompliance. PURPOSE: To assess institutional compliance and assist national quality improvement strategies through identifying valid reasons for noncompliance. METHODS: Compliance with NCCN Guidelines was recorded prospectively using electronic synoptic templates for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer treated at a single institution between January 2010 and December 2011. Compliance with NCCN Guidelines was recorded. The accuracy of real-time synoptic auditing methods compared with retrospective chart review and reasons for noncompliance was assessed. SAS 9.3 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Compliance with NCCN Guidelines among 395 patients was 94% for initial staging evaluation, 97% for surgery, 91% for chemotherapy, 89% for hormone therapy, 91% for radiation therapy, 85% for follow-up, and 100% for determination of estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor and HER2 status. Age, comorbidities, and stage influenced guideline compliance. The most common reasons for noncompliance were patient refusal, patient choice after shared decision-making, and overuse of testing. Synoptic templated reporting was accurate in 97% patients. CONCLUSIONS: High compliance with NCCN Guidelines was demonstrated. Reasons for noncompliance were identifiable. Compliance and nonadherence can be evaluated quickly with electronic synoptic reporting. This allows real-time action plans to address quality concerns and aids national risk adjustment for comparison and benchmarking.

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype distribution, geodemographic patterns, and survival in the US: A longitudinal analysis of the National Cancer Data Base from 1998 to 2011.

The World Health Organization classification of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was introduced in 2001. However, its incorporation into clinical practice is not well-described. We studied the distribution of NHL subtypes in adults diagnosed from 1998 to 2011, evaluated time trends, geo-demographic correlates, and changes in 5-year overall survival (OS). We obtained data prospectively collected by the National Cancer Data Base, which covers 70% of US cancer cases. There were 596,476 patients diagnosed with NHL. The major subtypes were diffuse large B-cell (32.5%), chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL; 18.6%), follicular (17.1%), marginal zone (8.3%), mantle cell (4.1%), peripheral T-cell not-otherwise-specified (1.7%), Burkitt (1.6%), hairy cell (1.1%), lymphoplasmacytic (1.1%), and NHL not-otherwise-specified (10.8%). Over the study period, the proportion of NHL not-otherwise-specified declined by half, while marginal zone lymphoma doubled. The distribution of major and rare NHL subtypes varied according to demographics but less so geographically or by type of treatment facility. We noted several novel findings among Hispanics (lower proportion of CLL/SLL, but higher Burkitt lymphoma and nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma), Asians (higher enteropathy-associated T-cell and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphomas), Blacks (higher hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma), and Native Americans (similar proportions of CLL/SLL and nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma as Asians). With the exception of peripheral T-cell not-otherwise-specified and hairy cell leukemia, 5-year OS has improved for all the major NHL subtypes.

Twitter Social Media is an Effective Tool for Breast Cancer Patient Education and Support: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Survey.

BACKGROUND: Despite reported benefits, many women do not attend breast cancer support groups. Abundant online resources for support exist, but information regarding the effectiveness of participation is lacking. We report the results of a Twitter breast cancer support community participant survey. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the effectiveness of social media as a tool for breast cancer patient education and decreasing anxiety. METHODS: The Breast Cancer Social Media Twitter support community (#BCSM) began in July 2011. Institutional review board approval with a waiver of informed consent was obtained for a deidentified survey that was posted for 2 weeks on Twitter and on the #BCSM blog and Facebook page. RESULTS: There were 206 respondents to the survey. In all, 92.7% (191/206) were female. Respondents reported increased knowledge about breast cancer in the following domains: overall knowledge (80.9%, 153/189), survivorship (85.7%, 162/189), metastatic breast cancer (79.4%, 150/189), cancer types and biology (70.9%, 134/189), clinical trials and research (66.1%, 125/189), treatment options (55.6%, 105/189), breast imaging (56.6%, 107/189), genetic testing and risk assessment (53.9%, 102/189), and radiotherapy (43.4%, 82/189). Participation led 31.2% (59/189) to seek a second opinion or bring additional information to the attention of their treatment team and 71.9% (136/189) reported plans to increase their outreach and advocacy efforts as a result of participation. Levels of reported anxiety before and after participation were analyzed: 29 of 43 (67%) patients who initially reported "high or extreme" anxiety reported "low or no" anxiety after participation (P<.001). Also, no patients initially reporting low or no anxiety before participation reported an increase to high or extreme anxiety after participation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that breast cancer patients' perceived knowledge increases and their anxiety decreases by participation in a Twitter social media support group.

Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Mastery(SM) database.

BACKGROUND: There is marked variability of re-excision rates after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer. Reasons for re-excision and variability across surgeons have not been well documented. We hypothesized the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery(SM) Program can identify reasons for re-excision. METHODS: Data from January 1 to 7 November 2013 were evaluated in the ASBrS Mastery(SM) Program to determine re-excision lumpectomy rate (RELR). On 1 June 2013, a tool to track reasons for re-excision was developed. Variation in re-excision rate by surgeon and patient characteristics was performed by Chi square test and Fisher's test for univariate analysis, then logistic regression with backwards elimination method for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: For 6,725 patients undergoing initial lumpectomy for cancer, 328 surgeons reported 1,451 (21.6 %) patients had one or more re-excisions. The most common reasons for re-excision were ink positive margins in 783 (49.7 %), margin <1 mm (34.3 %), and margin 1-2 mm (7.2 %). By multivariate analysis, re-excision rates were lower in patients aged less than 35 years, with White (non-) Hispanic ethnicity, and, among surgeons in solo practice, more years in practice and higher-volume practice. CONCLUSION: Half of re-excisions after initial lumpectomy were performed for margins that are positive. Most of the remainder were for negative close (<1-2 mm) margins. This information corroborates surgeon survey data regarding reasons for re-excision and provides proof of concept the Mastery(SM) Program can capture surgical outcome data in real time, providing opportunity and a method for future performance improvement.

Prevalence of illicit drug use in pregnant women in a Wisconsin private practice setting.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to measure the prevalence of illicit drug use in our obstetric population, to identify the drugs being used, and to determine whether a modified version of the 4Ps Plus screening tool could serve as an initial screen. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study, urine samples of 200 unselected patients presenting for initiation of prenatal care in a Wisconsin private practice were analyzed for evidence of the use of illicit drugs. RESULTS: Of 200 patients, 26 (13%) had evidence of drugs of abuse in their urine samples. Marijuana (7%) and opioids (6.5%) were the most commonly identified drugs. Adding 5 questions about drug or alcohol use to the obstetric intake questionnaire proved sensitive in identifying patients with high risks of having a positive drug screen. CONCLUSION: The rate of drug use in our low-risk population was higher than expected and may reflect increasing rates of drug use across the United States. Enhanced screening should be performed to identify patients using illicit drugs in pregnancy to improve their care. Medical centers and communities may benefit from periodic testing of their community prevalence rates to aid in appropriate care planning.

Use of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation as initial therapy in multiple myeloma and the impact of socio-geo-demographic factors in the era of novel agents.

Very effective combination chemotherapy using novel agents has become available in multiple myeloma (MM). Its impact on the use of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) as part of initial therapy is unknown. Using the National Cancer Data Base, we studied the rate of upfront AHCT use among 137,409 newly diagnosed MM patients from 1998 to 2010 in the United States and determined whether disparity exists among various sociodemographic as well as geographic subgroups. Overall, 12,378 (9.0%) patients received AHCT as part of initial treatment. The use of upfront AHCT increased steadily from 5.2% in 1998 to 12.1% in 2010 (trend test, P < 0.001), with no sign of plateau. This was seen across all socio-geo-demographic subgroups except among patients treated in the Northeast where the rate fell from 8.7% in 1998 to 6.6% in 2010. In multivariable analysis, patients with the following characteristics were the least likely to receive AHCT (odds ratio): year of diagnosis from 1998 to 2003 before the era of novel agents (0.67), older age (0.35), Black race (0.58), Hispanic ethnicity (0.78), low level of education or annual household income (0.55), residence in a metro area (0.66), no or unknown medical insurance (0.30), treatment at a community cancer center (0.16), and treatment facility located in the Northeast region (0.54). Even after the introduction of novel agents, the rate of upfront AHCT in MM continues to increase annually. Significant disparities exist dependent on demographic, social, and geographic factors.

Evaluation of Food Safety Knowledge and Attitudes Among Adults in the United Arab Emirates.

Background Food is handled by many individuals in large food setups, therefore increasing the chance of contamination that leads to foodborne diseases (FBDs). This study was purposed to evaluate adults' understanding of food safety, FBDs, and hygiene practices across various demographic groups in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and to explore the link between their knowledge of food safety and their corresponding attitudes. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with 402 adults using a validated, self-administered questionnaire available in both printed and online formats. The study was carried out at Gulf Medical University and Thumbay hospitals and clinics over six months, beginning in December 2022 to June 2023. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). The chi-squared test was employed to examine the association between variables, and significant associations were further analyzed through logistic regression. Results Out of the 402 participants, the population was predominantly female 275 (67.9%), and from Southeast Asia 222 (55.4%), with students comprising the largest occupational group 186 (47%). Only 106 (26.36%) had received food safety training, and a mere 187 (46.51%) demonstrated adequate knowledge. Awareness levels varied, with the highest for raw food safety (64.02%) and the lowest for canned foods (40.79%). Demographic analysis revealed significant associations: males exhibited more inadequate knowledge 79 (62.2%) than females 136 (49.4%), and students showed higher inadequacy 104 (55.9%) compared to healthcare workers 31 (35.6%). Positive attitudes towards food safety were prevalent 226 (56.2%), and positive attitudes were found in women 157 (57.1%), individuals above 30 years of age 110 (50.5%), individuals working in healthcare 140 (62%), and married individuals 117 (60.9%). With a strong correlation (p<0.001), women were 1.68 times more likely to possess adequate knowledge than men (95% CI: 1.09, 2.59), and healthcare workers were 2.33 times more likely than students (95% CI: 1.37, 3.95). Conclusion The study reveals a low level of knowledge about food safety among adults in the UAE. Therefore, emphasis should be placed on increasing awareness of these concepts to reduce the burden of FBDs on the healthcare system.

An exploratory study of the use of advance directives by US oncologists.

PURPOSE: This study sought to determine the rate of advance directive completion among US oncologists and factors influencing such a decision. METHODS: We surveyed 7590 members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology using a web-based questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 8.1%. Most respondents (59%) had completed at least 1 document: 9% living will, 9% power of attorney for health care, and 41% both. Respondents who were older, men, married, with children, working in the community setting, radiation oncologists, and practicing general oncology were more likely than their counterparts to have an advance directive. Among those who had one, 95% and 36% had discussed their wishes with their loved ones and health care providers, respectively. Factors including experience at work, spouse, children, family, and religion had the most influence on respondents' decision. The majority of those without an advance directive reported either no reason or lack of time. Those who had them were more likely to report having a comprehensive review of their wishes with those closest to them, being more knowledgeable, having more routine discussions with their patients, and being more comfortable helping their patients complete one. CONCLUSION: Only about half of US oncologists who responded to our survey have completed an advance directive.

Gold Nanoparticles Perturb Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Antioxidants in the Livers of Male Rats: Potential Impact on Drug Interactions.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: With the wide applications of chitosan and gold nanoparticles in drug delivery and many consumer products, there is limited available information about their effects on drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs). Changes in DMEs could result in serious drug interactions. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of exposure to chitosan or gold nanoparticles on hepatic Phase I and II DMEs, liver function and integrity, oxidative damage and liver architecture in male rats. METHODS: Animals were divided into three equal groups: a control group, a group treated with chitosan nanoparticles (200 mg/kg, 50±5 nm) and a group treated with gold nanoparticles (4 mg/kg, 15±5 nm). Rats were orally administered their respective doses daily for 10 days. RESULTS: Both chitosan and gold nanoparticles decreased the body weights by more than 10%. Gold nanoparticles reduced the activities of antioxidants (superoxide dismutase and catalase), and reduced glutathione level and elevated the malondialdehyde level in the liver. Gold nanoparticles caused significant reductions in CYP1A1, CYP2E1, quinone oxidoreductase1, and glutathione S-transferase and elevated CYP2D6 and N-acetyl transferase2. Chitosan elevated CYP2E1 and CYP2D6 and reduced UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1. Both nanoparticles disturbed the architecture of the liver, but the deleterious effects after gold nanoparticles treatment were more prominent. CONCLUSION: Taken together, gold nanoparticles severely perturbed the DMEs and would result in serious interactions with many drugs, herbs, and foods.

Outcomes of Anterior Exposure for Spinal Surgery at an Independent Academic Medical Center.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior exposure for spinal surgery has expanded and is used for common spinal procedures, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion, disc replacement, and vertebral corpectomy. With this approach, vascular injuries have been reported ranging from 1% to 25%. The impact of resident participation on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes within an independent academic medical center has not been widely reported. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of complications during anterior exposure spinal surgery at an independent academic medical center. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients who underwent elective anterior exposure for spinal surgery from 2000 through 2014. RESULTS: The study included 335 patients; 60.3% were female. Thirty-day postoperative complications included surgical site infection (4.2%), urinary tract infection (2.7%), need for blood transfusion (2.1%), retrograde ejaculation (1.2%), and deep vein thrombosis (0.9%). There were 12 vascular injuries overall (3.6%); 2.7% were major vascular injuries. Surgery residents participated in 34% of cases. Resident involvement increased over the course of the study. There was no difference in operative time or complications with resident involvement. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of major vascular injury was 2.7%. Levels of exposure and blood loss were associated with vascular injury. Overall postoperative complication rates as well as major vascular injury rates compared favorably to published benchmarks. Complication rates were unaffected by surgical resident involvement.

Effectiveness of a Survivorship Program: An Assessment of Patients With Breast Cancer in a Community Setting.

PURPOSE: This study assesses the effectiveness of a single institution's breast cancer survivorship program on patient perceptions, quality of life (QOL), and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for follow-up. METHODS: Sampled patients completed all their breast cancer treatment at a single tertiary center. Surveys designed to evaluate QOL were obtained, and retrospective medical record review was conducted to assess NCCN compliance. Survivorship clinic (SC) attendees and nonattendees were matched for age and disease stage for comparison of the outcomes (QOL, NCCN compliance, and overall effectiveness). RESULTS: SC patients (n = 63) tended to perceive their concerns in various categories to be addressed more adequately than did nonattendees (n = 54), with significant differences in the areas of practical concerns (P = .03) and late-term adverse effects (P = .03). There was a significant difference in compliance with three NCCN guidelines (history and physical every 3 to 6 months, annual mammography, and a pelvic examination if on tamoxifen) between survivorship attendees and nonattendees (P < .001, P = .02, and P < .001, respectively). Women who attended an SC used other survivorship support resources more often. CONCLUSION: Survivorship programs can be time and resource consuming, but our study is one of the first to show that a survivorship program effectively changes patient behavior in important ways. Patients who attended an SC were more likely to be compliant with NCCN-recommended follow-up and to use other survivorship resources and felt their concerns were better addressed. These measures can be used to help us improve our survivorship services and by other institutions to measure the quality and effectiveness of their programs.

Is the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator applicable for breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery?

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the applicability of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) calculator to patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: A total of 287 consecutive patients treated with breast-conserving surgery from 2010 to 2012 were identified retrospectively. The risk calculator was applied to each patient to generate an individual risk profile. Risk calculations were then compared with actual outcomes. The performance of the risk calculator was evaluated using 2 metrics: the Brier score and c statistic. RESULTS: The NSQIP calculator performed adequately for all complications, with Brier scores less than .05. However, 37 patients (12.9%) returned to the operating room for oncologic indications. Twenty-nine patients (10.1%) had positive margins, whereas 8 patients (2.8%) returned due to an upgrade in diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: When considering return to the operating room for oncologic management, the observed rate of 13.9% is significantly higher than the NSQIP prediction. This deviation must be addressed when using the NSQIP risk calculator model during preoperative risk discussion.

Are Cure Rates for Breast Cancer Improved by Local and Regional Anesthesia?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent preclinical basic science studies suggest that patient tumor immunity is altered by general anesthesia (GA), potentially worsening cancer outcomes. A single retrospective review concluded that breast cancer patients receiving paravertebral block and GA had better cancer outcomes compared with patients receiving GA alone. This study has not been validated. We hypothesized that local or regional anesthesia (LRA) would be associated with better cancer outcomes compared with GA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database to identify all stage 0-III breast cancer patients undergoing surgery in a single center during a 9-year period ending January 1, 2010. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received only LRA and those who received GA. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local regional recurrence (LRR) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank comparison before and after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Median age of the 1107 patients who met study criteria was 64 years (range, 24-97 years). Median and longest follow-up were 5.5 and 12.5 years, respectively. General anesthesia was used for 461 patients (42%), and 646 (58%) received LRA. The point estimates of cumulative OS, DFS, and LRR "free" rates at 5 years for the GA and LRA groups were 85.5% and 87.1%, 94.2% and 96.1%, and 96.3% and 95.8%, respectively. Cox regression showed no significant differences between the 2 groups (GA and LRA) for the 3 outcomes: OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-1.10; P = 0.17), DFS (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.55-1.76; P = 0.87), and LRR (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.83-3.63; P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer OS, DFS, and LRR were not affected by type of anesthesia in our institution. This result differs from that of the only prior published clinical report on this topic and does not provide clinical corroboration of the basic science studies that suggest oncologic benefits to LRA.

Are Breast Cancer Outcomes Compromised by General Surgical Resident Participation in the Operation?

OBJECTIVE: The effect of surgery resident participation on breast cancer recurrence has not been previously reported. The objectives of this study were to determine if resident participation was associated with either immediate postoperative or long-term breast cancer outcomes. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected breast center database to identify all patients with breast cancer undergoing surgery in a single center during a 9-year period ending 1 January 2010. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether surgery residents completed more than 50% of the critical portions of the case (Resident group) or not. The outcomes of operation length, reoperative rates, morbidity, and the long-term outcomes of cancer recurrence were compared by group. Comparisons of immediate postoperative outcomes were made with chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Comparisons of operation length were analyzed by Wilcoxon rank-sum testing. Survival analyses were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank comparison. Multivariate analysis with Cox regression was also performed. SETTING: The study occurred at a community-based hospital that has an accredited general surgery training program. PARTICIPANTS: In all, 1107 consecutive patients with stage 0-3 breast cancer undergoing breast cancer operations were included. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 64 years (range: 24-97). Median and longest follow-up were 5.5 and 12.5 years, respectively. Initial operation was breast conserving in 796 (72%) and mastectomy in 311 (28%). Of the 1107 patients, 887 (80.1%) had resident participation. The Resident group was associated with longer operative times. We identified no differences in operative morbidity, reoperations, overall survival, disease-free survival, or local-regional recurrence in the Resident and No Resident groups. CONCLUSIONS: Resident involvement in breast cancer operations was associated with longer operative times but did not affect any other perioperative or cancer outcome in our institution. This information can be used to reassure program directors, attending surgeons, and patients if they have questions or concerns about the safety or effectiveness of cancer surgery when there is surgical resident participation.

Determining whether excision of all fibroepithelial lesions of the breast is needed to exclude phyllodes tumor: upgrade rate of fibroepithelial lesions of the breast to phyllodes tumor.

Fibroepithelial lesions (FELs) are a common histologic finding on core needle biopsy (CNB) of the breast. Fibroepithelial lesions include fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumor, which can be difficult to distinguish with an initial CNB. An institutional experience was reviewed from February 12, 2001, to January 4, 2007, to determine the safety of selective rather than routine excision of FELs and to determine the factors associated with upgrading diagnosis of FELs to phyllodes tumors without definitive phyllodes tumor diagnosis by CNB. Of 313 patients, 261 (83%) with FELs diagnosed by CNB received observation with long-term follow-up (mean, 8 years). Of the observed patients, 3 (1%) were diagnosed with phyllodes tumor on follow-up. Eighteen of 52 patients (35%) who received excision had an upgrade of diagnosis to phyllodes tumor. Sensitivity and specificity of the pathologist's comment of concern for phyllodes tumor on a CNB demonstrating FELs without definitive phyllodes tumor diagnosis were 82% and 93%, respectively. Our policy of selective excision of FELs without definitive phyllodes tumor diagnosis resulted in safe avoidance of many surgical procedures.