Macrophages Under the Influence of Tumor Mesothelin Weaken Host Defenses against Pancreatic Cancer Metastasis.

Although pancreatic cancer is a systemic disease that metastasizes early in its course, the signaling systems that promote this behavior remain incompletely understood. In this issue of Cancer Research, Luckett and colleagues identify a paracrine signaling pathway between cancer cells and macrophages that promotes pancreatic cancer metastasis. The authors used immunocompetent murine pancreatic cancer models with high versus low metastatic potential, genetic knockout and complementation strategies, and The Cancer Genome Atlas human data to demonstrate that tumor-secreted mesothelin repolarizes tumor and lung macrophages to a tumor-supportive phenotype. The repolarized macrophages increase secretion of VEGF and S100A9, raising local concentrations. In turn, VEGF enhances colony formation of cancer cells, while S100A9 promotes the recruitment of neutrophils to the lungs and the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps that support tumor metastasis. Together, these findings reveal a systemic signaling pathway that promotes pancreatic cancer metastasis by co-opting macrophages typically protective against cancer to instead promote its spread. See related article by Luckett et al., p. 527.

Tofacitinib to prevent anti-drug antibody formation against LMB-100 immunotoxin in patients with advanced mesothelin-expressing cancers.

Background: LMB-100 is a mesothelin (MSLN)-targeting recombinant immunotoxin (iTox) carrying a Pseudomonas exotoxin A payload that has shown promise against solid tumors, however, efficacy is limited by the development of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Tofacitinib is an oral Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor that prevented ADA formation against iTox in preclinical studies. Methods: A phase 1 trial testing LMB-100 and tofacitinib in patients with MSLN-expressing cancers (pancreatic adenocarcinoma, n=13; cholangiocarcinoma, n=1; appendiceal carcinoma, n=1; cystadenocarcinoma, n=1) was performed to assess safety and to determine if tofacitinib impacted ADA formation. Participants were treated for up to 3 cycles with LMB-100 as a 30-minute infusion on days 4, 6, and 8 at two dose levels (100 and 140 µg/kg) while oral tofacitinib was administered for the first 10 days of the cycle (10 mg BID). Peripheral blood was collected for analysis of ADA levels, serum cytokines and circulating immune subsets. Results: The study was closed early due to occurrence of drug-induced pericarditis in 2 patients. Pericarditis with the combination was not reproducible in a transgenic murine model containing human MSLN. Two of 4 patients receiving all 3 cycles of treatment maintained effective LMB-100 levels, an unusual occurrence. Sustained increases in systemic IL-10 and TNF-α were seen, a phenomenon not observed in prior LMB-100 studies. A decrease in activated T cell subsets and an increase in circulating immunosuppressive myeloid populations occurred. No radiologic decreases in tumor volume were observed. Discussion: Further testing of tofacitinib to prevent ADA formation is recommended in applicable non-malignant disease settings. Clinical trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04034238.