Development of amoebic liver abscess in early pregnancy years after initial amoebic exposure: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Infection with Entamoeba histolytica and associated complications are relatively rare in developed countries. The overall low prevalence in the Western world as well as the possibly prolonged latency period between infection with the causing pathogen and onset of clinical symptoms may delay diagnosis of and adequate treatment for amoebiasis. Amoebic liver abscess (ALA) is the most common extraintestinal manifestation of invasive amoebiasis. Pregnancy has been described as a risk factor for development of invasive amoebiasis and management of these patients is especially complex. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old Caucasian woman in early pregnancy presented to our emergency department with abdominal pain alongside elevated inflammatory markers and liver function tests. Travel history revealed multiple journeys to tropic and subtropic regions during the past decade and a prolonged episode of intermittently bloody diarrhea during a five month stay in Indonesia seven years prior to admission. Sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 5 × 4 cm hepatic abscess. After ultrasound-guided transcutaneous liver drainage, both abscess fluids and blood cultures showed neither bacterial growth nor microscopic signs of parasitic disease. Serological testing confirmed an infection with Entamoeba histolytica, which was treated with metronidazole, followed by eradication therapy with paromomycin. Subsequent clinical, laboratory and imaging follow-up exams showed regression of the ALA. In addition, the pregnancy completed without complications and a healthy baby boy was born 7 months after termination of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This case of invasive amoebiasis in early pregnancy outside of endemic regions and several years after exposure demonstrates the importance of broad differential diagnostics in the context of liver abscesses. The complex interdisciplinary decisions regarding the choice of imaging techniques as well as interventional and antibiotic therapy in the context of pregnancy are discussed. Furthermore, we present possible explanations for pregnancy as a risk factor for an invasive course of amoebiasis.

Peripheral priming induces plastic transcriptomic and proteomic responses in circulating neutrophils required for pathogen containment.

Neutrophils rapidly respond to inflammation and infection, but to which degree their functional trajectories after mobilization from the bone marrow are shaped within the circulation remains vague. Experimental limitations have so far hampered neutrophil research in human disease. Here, using innovative fixation and single-cell-based toolsets, we profile human and murine neutrophil transcriptomes and proteomes during steady state and bacterial infection. We find that peripheral priming of circulating neutrophils leads to dynamic shifts dominated by conserved up-regulation of antimicrobial genes across neutrophil substates, facilitating pathogen containment. We show the TLR4/NF-κB signaling-dependent up-regulation of canonical neutrophil activation markers like CD177/NB-1 during acute inflammation, resulting in functional shifts in vivo. Blocking de novo RNA synthesis in circulating neutrophils abrogates these plastic shifts and prevents the adaptation of antibacterial neutrophil programs by up-regulation of distinct effector molecules upon infection. These data underline transcriptional plasticity as a relevant mechanism of functional neutrophil reprogramming during acute infection to foster bacterial containment within the circulation.

Marked Increase of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase as an Indicator of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients without Conventional Diagnostic Criteria of Acute Liver Injury.

Introduction: Clinically significant drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is defined by elevations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥2 × ULN, or ALT ≥3 × ULN and total bilirubin TBIL >2 × ULN. However, DILI might also occur in patients who do not reach those thresholds and still may benefit from discontinuation of medication. Methods: Fifteen patients recruited for our prospective study on potentially hepatotoxic drugs were included. DILI diagnosis was based on RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) score and expert opinion and was supported by an in vitro test using monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like (MH) cells. Results: Median RUCAM score was 6 (range 4-8), indicating that DILI was possible or probable in all cases. The predominant types of liver injury were mixed (60%) and cholestatic (40%). While no elevation above 2 × ULN of ALP and TBIL was observed, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) above 2 × ULN was identified in 8 of the patients. Six of the 15 patients did not achieve full remission and showed persistent elevation of GGT, which was significantly associated with peak GGT elevation above 2 × ULN (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Here we present a case series of patients with liver enzyme elevation below the conventional thresholds who developed DILI with a predominant GGT elevation leading to drug withdrawal and/or chronic elevation of liver parameters, in particular of GGT. Thus, we propose that DILI should be considered in particular in cases with marked increase of GGT even if conventional DILI threshold levels are not reached, resulting in discontinuation of the causative drug and/or close monitoring of the patients.

Acute liver injury following methylprednisolone pulse therapy: 13 cases from a prospectively collected cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a challenging diagnosis requiring exclusion of other causes of liver injury, concise medical history taking to identify potential causative medication and creation of a plausible temporal relation to attribute said liver injury to a potentially hepatotoxic agent. In spite of corticosteroids being considered an effective treatment for DILI in some patients, methylprednisolone (MPS) has been associated with liver injury of varying severity. METHODS: We analyzed data of our prospective study on potentially hepatotoxic drugs (NCT02353455), identified 13 cases of MPS-associated liver injury and performed an analysis of clinical, laboratory and histopathological characteristics. For all available liver biopsy specimens, expert histopathological analysis was performed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with a variety of primarily neurologic autoimmune diseases treated with MPS developed subsequent liver injury with a median latency of 5 weeks. Liver injury was severe or required transplantation in six patients. Injury typically occurred after repeated pulsing was hepatocellular and responded swiftly to prednisolone administration. For those patients who received in house-follow up, relapse after discontinuation of immunosuppression was not observed. Histopathological features of MPS-DILI comprised both interface and periportal hepatitis with mixed inflammatory infiltrates, similar to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) features. DISCUSSION: MPS-related liver injury can be life-threatening, occurs with considerable latency and after repeat dosing. Regular surveillance of hepatic biochemistry should therefore be routinely performed also after discharge to avoid further MPS-related liver injury during repeat application. Swift response to prednisolone but not histologic features can be helpful to discriminate MPS-DILI from AIH.