Effect of concomitant oral chronic dipyridamole therapy on inflammatory cytokines in heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: To assess whether dipyridamole therapy exerts a significant anti-inflammatory effect in heart failure patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the stored bio-samples of 3 groups of patients: 1) 25 normal healthy controls (N); 2) 25 heart failure patients (HF) under standard optimal therapy, including aspirin; 3) 17 HF patients with previous stroke and under clinically-driven therapy with A (Aggrenox, long-acting dipyridamole 200 mg + aspirin 25 mg, twice daily) for at least 1 month (HF-A). In all, we evaluated interleukin (IL)-6, adiponectin and C-reactive protein (CRP) as well as NT-proBNP. The same laboratory measurements were performed in the 17 HF patients with recent or previous stroke, both before and 1-month after clinically driven administration of A. RESULTS: All laboratory inflammatory indices were significantly higher in HF patients compared to N: IL-6 (N = 0.68 (0.3 - 12.7) vs. HF = 3.10 (0.5 - 16.7) vs. HF-A = 1.24 (0.3 - 3.3) pg/mL; p < 0.001 N vs. HF, p < 0.01 N vs. HF-A, p = ns HF vs. HF-A); CRP (N = 0.12 (0.01 - 0.45) vs. HF = 0.58 (0.04 - 2.7) vs. HF-A = 0.72 (0.02 - 4.8) mg/dL; p = ns N vs. HF, p = 0.05 N vs. HF-A, p = ns HF vs. HF-A); Adiponectin (N = 8.8 (3.0 - 31.4) vs. HF = 12.16 (4.9 - 27.3) vs. HF-A = 10.0 (4.8 - 15.6) pg/mL; p < 0.05 N vs. HF, p = ns N vs. HF-A p = ns HF vs. HF-A). NT-proBNP was also increased (N = 42.2 (13 - 93) vs. HF = 1907 (18.1 - 8038) vs. HF-A = 497.9 (7.8 - 3686) pg/mL; p < 0.001 N vs. HF, p = 0.01 N vs. HF-A, p = ns HF vs. HF-A). In 17 subjects, the intra-patient assessment (before and 1-month after starting of Aggrenox therapy) did not show a decrease in inflammation markers. CONCLUSIONS: HF patients show an increase in inflammatory indices independently of underlying A therapy.

Management of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Complex Aorta Anatomy: The Importance of Pre-Procedural Planning.

Aortic stenosis is the most common primary valve lesion requiring surgery or, especially for older patients, transcatheter intervention (TAVI). We showcase a successful transfemoral TAVI procedure in a very high-risk patient and an extremely tortuous S-shaped descending aorta, characterized by heavy calcifications and multiple strong resistance points. We demonstrated that transfemoral TAVI using the "buddy stiff guidewire" technique could be a feasible, simple, quick, and easy procedure able to straighten an extremely abdominal aorta tortuosity. With all techniques available and careful pre-procedural planning, and thanks to the flexibility of new generation TAVI delivery systems, it is possible to safely perform the procedure even in the most challenging patients.

Heparin versus bivalirudin for carotid artery stenting using proximal endovascular clamping for neuroprotection: results from a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: General recommendations indicate that, during a carotid artery stenting (CAS), sufficient unfractionated heparin (UFH) has to be given to maintain the activated clotting time between 250 to 300 seconds. Bivalirudin use is able to reduce postprocedural bleedings in percutaneous interventions when compared with UFH. The study purpose was to evaluate, in a randomized study, the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin during CAS, using proximal endovascular occlusion (PEO) as a distal protection device. METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2009, 220 patients undergoing CAS using PEO have been randomly assigned to one of the study arms (control arm: 100 UI/kg UFH or bivalirudin arm: 0.75 mg/kg intravenous bolus and intraprocedural infusion at 1.75 mg/kg/h). RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in all the patients. No episodes of intraprocedural thrombosis occurred. One major stroke occurred in the bivalirudin arm, and two minor strokes occurred, one in each group. A significant difference in the incidence of postprocedural bleedings was observed between the study groups; bivalirudin use was associated with reduced number of bleedings according to Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The use of bivalirudin should be considered a safe and effective anticoagulation regimen during CAS, using PEO as a distal protection device. Bivalirudin use is associated with a reduced incidence of bleedings.

The combined use of Drug-eluting balloon and Excimer laser for coronary artery Restenosis In-Stent Treatment: The DERIST study.

AIM: Stents reduce angiographic restenosis in comparison with balloon angioplasty. The rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR), although less frequent than post-angioplasty restenosis, is becoming increasingly prevalent due to the recent exponential increase in the use of intracoronary stents. The aim of this study is to evaluate angiographic and clinical outcomes of PTCA in combination with the use of excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) and drug-eluting balloon (DEB) in treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS AND RESULTS: This multi-centric case-control study evaluated angiographic and clinical outcomes of PTCA with excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) and drug-eluting balloon (DEB) in 80 patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). All patients underwent nine months of clinical and a coronary angiography follow-up. This study showed clinical and angiographic long-term success in the 91% of the patients. The incidence of myocardial infarctions and deaths was lower than the rate after plain balloon angioplasty within the stent. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) and drug-eluting balloon (DEB) may be an alternative treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Drug therapy during percutaneous coronary interventions in stable and unstable coronary artery disease: the Italian Drug Evaluation in Angioplasty (IDEA) study.

BACKGROUND: Although periprocedural drug therapy has been shown to improve the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), information regarding its use in daily clinical practice is limited. METHODS: We conducted a national survey on periprocedural drug therapy across the spectrum of PCI practice in Italy. Seventy-nine centers (41% of the Italian interventional cath labs) with a fair distribution across the country volunteered to enroll consecutive patients undergoing PCI for any indication from September 15 to 29, 2003. RESULTS: Of the 1517 patients enrolled, 745 (49 %) had stable coronary disease and 772 (51%) acute coronary syndromes (ACS): 457 without and 315 with ST-segment elevation. Stenting was used in 89% of cases. N-acetylcysteine was used in 23% of the patients with preexisting renal dysfunction. Thienopyridine (63% clopidogrel) pretreatment was given in 49 % of the cases and, at logistic regression analysis, was independently associated with prior myocardial infarction (p < 0.001), prior PCI (p = 0.007), stable coronary disease (p = 0.005), and treatment in northern Italy (p < 0.05). Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockers (50% abciximab 50% tirofiban) were used in 22% of the stable patients and 40 % of those with ACS, a proportion increasing to 62 % when PCI was undertaken as an emergency procedure. Off-label use of these drugs was frequent (direct cath lab use of tirofiban in 55% of the cases; bailout use: 16% with abciximab and 26% with tirofiban). At logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of GP IIb/IIIa receptor blocker use were emergency procedure (odds ratio 3.6, 95 % confidence interval 2.6 to 5.0, p < 0.0001) and treatment for an ACS (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.1, p = 0.0002). An emergency procedure was the only independent predictor for the use of abciximab instead of tirofiban (odds ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 2.6 to 6.5, p < 0.0001). Triple periprocedural antiplatelet therapy, including aspirin, a thienopyridine and a GP IIb/IIIa receptor blocker was administered in only 21% of cases. At discharge, all stented patients received aspirin and a thienopyridine. Despite complete procedural success in > 90% of cases, 50% of the patients were discharged on symptomatic anti-ischemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A wide gap exists between guideline recommendations and periprocedural drug therapy in PCI, the only exception being full prescription of aspirin and a thienopyridine at discharge after stenting. In patients with ACS, thienopyridine pretreatment is often used as a surrogate for GP IIb/IIIa blockade, whose use rather is associated with emergency procedures. Off-label use of drugs is not uncommon.

Early outcome of high energy Laser (Excimer) facilitated coronary angioplasty ON hARD and complex calcified and balloOn-resistant coronary lesions: LEONARDO Study.

AIM: An innovative xenon-chlorine (excimer) pulsed laser catheter (ELCA X80) has been recently used for the treatment of complex coronary lesions, as calcified stenosis, chronic total occlusions and non-compliant plaques. Such complex lesions are difficult to adequately treat with balloon angioplasty and/or intracoronary stenting. The aim of this study was to examine the acute outcome of this approach on a cohort of patients with coronary lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty patients with 100 lesions were enrolled through four centers, and excimer laser coronary angioplasty was performed on 96 lesions (96%). Safety and effectiveness data were compared between patients treated with standard laser therapy and those treated with increased laser therapy. Laser success was obtained in 90 lesions (93.7%), procedural success was reached in 88 lesions (91.7%), and clinical success in was obtained in 87 lesions (90.6%). There was no perforation, major side branch occlusion, spasm, no-reflow phenomenon, dissection nor acute vessel closure. Increased laser parameters were used successfully for 49 resistant lesions without complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that laser-facilitated coronary angioplasty is a simple, safe and effective device for the management of complex coronary lesions. Furthermore, higher laser energy levels delivered by this catheter improved the device performance without increasing complications.

Percutaneous femoral artery angioplasty with stent-in-stent technique and tirofiban administration.

Despite the use of stent implantation along with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, the rate of restenosis in high-risk patients is still high. Some studies have proven the ability of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists to reduce peri- and post-procedural thrombotic complications in endovascular procedures. We present the case of a 62-year-old female with in-stent restenosis who was successfully treated with femoral artery angioplasty with a stent-in-stent technique and tirofiban administration.

Excimer Laser LEsion modification to expand non-dilatable stents: the ELLEMENT registry.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Stent underexpansion is a risk factor for in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. Existing techniques to optimize stent expansion are sometimes ineffective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty (ELCA) in improving stent expansion when high-pressure non-compliant balloon inflation was ineffective. METHODS AND RESULTS: ECLA ablation was performed at high energy during contrast injection and only within the underexpanded stent. The primary endpoint of successful laser dilatation was defined as an increase of at least 1mm(2) in minimal stent cross-sectional area (MSA) on IVUS or an increase of at least 20% in minimal stent diameter (MSD) by QCA, following redilatation with the same non-compliant balloon that had been unsuccessful prior to ELCA. Secondary endpoints were cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization. Between June 2009 and November 2011, 28 patients with an underexpanded stent despite high-pressure balloon inflation were included. The mean laser catheter size was 1.2±0.4 (range 0.9-2.0mm) and a mean of 62±12mJ/mm(2) at 62±21hertz were required for optimal expansion. Laser-assisted stent dilatation was successful in 27 cases (96.4%), with an improvement in MSD by QCA (1.6±0.6mm at baseline to 2.6±0.6mm post-procedure) and MSA by IVUS (3.5±1.1mm(2) to 7.1±1.9mm(2)). Periprocedural MI occurred in 7.1%, transient slow-flow in 3.6% and ST elevation in 3.6%. During follow-up, there were no MIs, there was 1 cardiac-death, and TLR occurred in 6.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The ELLEMENT study confirms the feasibility of ELCA with contrast injection to improve stent underexpansion in undilatable stented lesions.

SAT-TAVI (single antiplatelet therapy for TAVI) study: a pilot randomized study comparing double to single antiplatelet therapy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Common clinical practice recommends dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of the study was to evaluate, in a double blind randomized study, the safety of TAVI, with adjunctive pharmacotherapy consisting of single antiplatelet therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: From April 2010 to April 2011, 120 consecutive patients, undergoing TAVI, have been enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to DAPT group (aspirin and clopidogrel 75 mg/qd or ticlopidine 500 mg/bid) or ASA group (aspirin only). TAVI device was the Sapien XT-Novaflex Delivery System (Edwards Lifesciences, Inc.). All patients were followed up to 6 months. Device success was achieved in 100% of patients. No difference in the VARC combined 30 day safety endpoint, all cause and cardiovascular mortality was observed. At 30 days vascular complications were reduced in the ASA group (p<0.05). No differences in the clinical status were detected between the groups up to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that TAVI procedures can be performed without DAPT without increasing the morbidity and mortality. These findings, if confirmed in a larger multicenter randomized trial, will no longer support the use of DAPT for TAVI.

Percutaneous sympathectomy of the renal arteries: the OneShot Renal Denervation System is not associated with significant vessel wall injury.

AIMS: Renal artery denervation (RADN) is an emerging technique for the treatment of resistant hypertension (RH). However, the use of the available systems has been associated with vascular injury, resulting in vasospasm and vessel wall thrombosis. The OneShot System (Covidien, San Jose, CA, USA) is an irrigated radiofrequency balloon designed to reduce vessel heating and injury during RADN. METHODS AND RESULTS: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the target vessel morphological features before and after renal ablation using the OneShot RADN system. In this prospective observational study, 12 renal arteries of patients underwent RADN using the OneShot™ RADN System. Pre-procedural and post-procedural optical coherence tomography (OCT) pullbacks were performed and evaluated. No evidence for vasospasm, oedema or intraluminal thrombus formation was detected. Limited arterial dissections, after RADN, occurred in three renal arteries and did not require additional treatments. A sustained reduction of office blood pressure levels was observed over six months of follow-up in all the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that, in a small patient population, RADN using the OneShot Renal Denervation System is not associated with arterial spasm or thrombus formation on the vessel wall.

[Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: position statement of the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE) on minimum standards for hospitals and operators]. / Documento di posizione della Società Italiana di Cardiologia Invasiva (SICI-GISE) sui requisiti minimi per ospedali ed operatori che eseguono procedure di impianto transcatetere di protesi valvolare aortica in pazienti con stenosi valvolare severa sintomatica.

At present, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a proven treatment option for patients with symptomatic degenerative aortic stenosis at high risk for conventional surgery. In countries where TAVI is currently performed, the number of procedures and centers involved has been continuously increasing. The present document from the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE) aims to improve the available evidence and current consensus on this topic through the definition of training needs and knowledge base for both operators and centers.

Combined treatment of heavy calcified femoro-popliteal lesions using directional atherectomy and a paclitaxel coated balloon: One-year single centre clinical results.

BACKGROUND: The use of directional atherectomy (DA) for the treatment of calcified femoro-popliteal lesions seems to improve the acute procedural success, however without reducing the long term restenosis rate. Drug coated balloons (DCB) reduced restenosis rate in non heavy calcified lesions. Aim of this study was to demonstrate safety and efficacy of a combined endovascular approach using DA and DCB for the treatment of heavy calcified lesions of the femoro-popliteal tract. METHODS: From January 2010 to November 2010, 240 patients underwent PTA of the femoro-popliteal tract in our institution. Within this cohort a total of 30 patients had life limiting claudication (LLC) (n=18) and 12 a critical limb ischemia (CLI) with baseline Rutherford class 4.2±1.2 underwent PTA of heavy calcified lesions with intravascular ultrasound guided DA and DCB. All procedures have been performed using a distal protection device. Stent implantation was allowed only in case of flow limiting dissections or suboptimal result (residual stenosis>50%) by visual estimation. After the intervention patients were followed up to 12 months. RESULTS: Procedural and clinical success, was achieved in all cases. Bail-out stenting was necessary in only two (6.5%). At twelve month follow up median Rutherford class was 2.2±1.2, ABI was 0.8±0.1 and Limb salvage rate was 100%. Two minor, foot finger or forefoot amputations, were performed to reach complete wound healing and/or preserve deambulation. Duplex control was performed in all the cases (n=30). In three cases duplex scan showed a significant target lesion restenosis requiring a reintervention (TLR=10%) leading a total one-year secondary patency rate of 100%. All the three restenosed patients were insulin dependent diabetics and none of them were stented during the procedure. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that combined use of DA and DCB may represent a potential alternative strategy for the treatment of femoro-popliteal severely calcified lesions. These very promising data and the considered hypothesis have to be confirmed in a multicentre randomised trial.

Drug-eluting balloon for treatment of superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective registry was to evaluate the safety and efficacy, at 1 year, of the use of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) for the treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: The use of the self-expanding nitinol stent has improved the patency rate of SFA after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). As the population with SFA stenting continues to increase, occurrence of ISR has become a serious problem. The use of DEB has showed promising results in reducing restenosis recurrence in coronary stents. METHODS: From December 2009 to December 2010, 39 consecutive patients underwent PTA of SFA-ISR in our institution. All patients underwent conventional SFA PTA and final post-dilation with paclitaxel-eluting balloons (IN.PACT, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). Patients were evaluated up to 12 months. RESULTS: Technical and procedural success was achieved in every patient. No in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred. At 1 year, 1 patient died due to heart failure. Primary endpoint, primary patency rate at 12 months, was obtained in 92.1% (35 patients). At 1 year, patients were asymptomatic for claudication, and duplex assessment demonstrated lack of recurrent restenosis (100% rate of Secondary patency). The presence of an occlusive restenosis at the time of treatment was not associated with an increased restenosis rate, when compared with non-occlusive restenosis, at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that adjunctive use of DEB for the treatment of SFA-ISR represents a potentially safe and effective therapeutic strategy. These data should be considered hypothesis-generating to design a randomized trial.

Proximal endovascular occlusion for carotid artery stenting: results from a prospective registry of 1,300 patients.

OBJECTIVES: This single-center registry presents the results of proximal endovascular occlusion (PEO) use in an unselected patient population. BACKGROUND: In published multicenter registries, the use of PEO for carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been demonstrated to be safe and efficient in patient populations selected for anatomical and/or clinical conditions. METHODS: From July 2004 to May 2009, 1,300 patients underwent CAS using PEO. Patients received an independent neurological assessment before the procedure and 1 h, 24 h, and 30 days after the procedure. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in 99.7% of patients. In hospital, major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events included 5 deaths (0.38%), 6 major strokes (0.46%), 5 minor strokes (0.38%), and no acute myocardial infarction. At 30 days of follow-up, 2 additional patients died (0.15%), and 1 patient had a minor stroke (0.07%). The 30-day stroke and death incidence was 1.38% (n = 19). Symptomatic patients presented a higher 30-day stroke and death incidence when compared with asymptomatic patients (3.04% vs. 0.82%; p < 0.05). No significant difference in 30-day stroke and death rate was observed between patients at high (1.88%; n = 12) and average surgical risk (1.07; n = 7) (p = NS). Operator experience, symptomatic status, and hypertension were found to be independent predictors of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PEO for CAS is safe and effective in an unselected patient population. Anatomical and/or clinical conditions of high surgical risk were not associated with an increased rate of adverse events.

Use of endovascular clamping as neuroprotection during carotid stenting in the presence of a critical ipsilateral stenosis of the external carotid artery.

AIMS: Proximal endovascular clamping (PEC) appears to be a safe and effective cerebral protection technique for carotid artery stenting (CAS). So far the presence of severe stenosis of the ipsilateral external carotid artery (ECA) was considered a contraindication to PEC. This study presents the results of PEC for CAS in patients simultaneously presenting an ipsilateral ECA stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: From September 2004 to December 2006, CAS was performed in 500 unselected cases using PEC. In sixty cases (12%) a severe ipsilateral ECA stenosis (>/=80%) was identified by angiography. In all these cases procedural success, defined as the ability to establish cerebral protection as well as stent deployment with a residual stenosis <30%, was achieved. Time of flow blockage was 188+/-37 sec. Clamping intolerance, a transient neurological deficit lasting < 20 min, occurred in five of 60 patients. In-hospital MACCE included only one minor stroke, but no major strokes, AMI or death. CONCLUSIONS: This experience indicates that the use of PEC, also in the presence of a critical ECA stenosis, is safe and effective. Therefore critical ECA stenosis should no longer be considered a contraindication to PEC.

The CIAO (Coronary Interventions Antiplatelet-based Only) Study: a randomized study comparing standard anticoagulation regimen to absence of anticoagulation for elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate, in a double-blind, randomized, prospective study, safety and efficacy of elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with pharmacotherapy consisting of antiplatelet therapy and no anticoagulation therapy. BACKGROUND: Available guidelines recommend systemic anticoagulation agent use during PCI. Significant debate remains, however, with regard to the correlation between the effects of systemic anticoagulation therapy and ensuing ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. METHODS: From June 2005 to January 2007, 700 patients undergoing elective PCI of an uncomplicated lesion have been prospectively enrolled in the protocol. Patients should have been on aspirin and thienopyridine therapy and were assigned either to the control arm (70 to 100 UI/kg unfractionated heparin) or to the no-heparin arm. A clinical assessment was obtained before hospital discharge and at 30 days after PCI. RESULTS: Procedural success was obtained in 100% of the cases. No acute or subacute thrombosis was observed. The absence of anticoagulation therapy was associated with a significant decrease in post-procedural myocardial damage (p = 0.03) and bleeding events (p = 0.048). At 30 days, the primary end point (death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization) was more frequent in the control arm than in the no-heparin arm (2.0% vs. 3.7%, respectively; absolute risk reduction 1.7% [95% confidence interval: -0.1% to 4.5%], p for superiority = 0.17, p for noninferiority <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of uncomplicated lesions and in the presence of dual antiplatelet therapy, elective PCI can be safely performed without systemic anticoagulation and is associated with a reduced incidence of bleeding complications.