Development of a Participatory Health Communication Intervention: An Ecological Approach to Reducing Rural Information Inequality and Health Disparities.

A strong and diverse communication infrastructure is essential for communication to improve health. When that infrastructure is weak, health information fails to reach appropriate audiences; this is a component of information inequality that contributes to health disparities. Approaches to addressing information inequality have either focused on individual-level barriers or exclusively on changing the information environment. Largely missing from information inequality interventions is a multilevel, ecological approach consistent with the ways in which information inequality affects health. This study addresses that gap by describing a participatory intervention in a rural, majority-Latino community. Previous work identified a weak information infrastructure as a major barrier to health: Residents struggled to find timely, relevant information, while stakeholders faced challenges knowing how to reach diverse audiences with critical health-related information. We employed participatory health communication asset mapping to identify health communication resources - safe, trusted spaces, and places - that served three distinct communication functions: informational (i.e., where health information can be provided), conversational (i.e., where residents feel comfortable discussing health issues), and connection (i.e., where a relationship exists). Through a six-step process, community leaders and residents identified communication resources and collaborated to create a communication resource map. We discuss how this study advances the theoretical understanding of integration of culture-centered and ecological approaches for communication to reduce health disparities.

Comparing the Relative Efficacy of Narrative vs Nonnarrative Health Messages in Reducing Health Disparities Using a Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the relative efficacy of a fictional narrative film to a more traditional nonnarrative film in conveying the same health information. METHODS: We used a random digit dial procedure to survey the cervical cancer-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of non-Hispanic White, Mexican American, and African American women, aged 25 to 45 years, living in Los Angeles, California, from 2011 to 2012. Participants (n = 704) were randomly assigned to view either a narrative or nonnarrative film containing the same information about how cervical cancer could be prevented or detected, and they were re-contacted 2 weeks and 6 months later. RESULTS: At 2 weeks, both films produced a significant increase in cervical cancer-related knowledge and attitudes, but these effects were significantly higher for the narrative film. At 6 months, viewers of both films retained greater than baseline knowledge and more positive attitudes toward Papanicolaou (Pap) tests, but women who saw the narrative were significantly more likely to have had or scheduled a Pap test. The narrative was particularly effective for Mexican American women, eliminating cervical cancer screening disparities found at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Narratives might prove to be a useful tool for reducing health disparities.