The impact of clinical genome sequencing in a global population with suspected rare genetic disease.

There is mounting evidence of the value of clinical genome sequencing (cGS) in individuals with suspected rare genetic disease (RGD), but cGS performance and impact on clinical care in a diverse population drawn from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has not been investigated. The iHope program, a philanthropic cGS initiative, established a network of 24 clinical sites in eight countries through which it provided cGS to individuals with signs or symptoms of an RGD and constrained access to molecular testing. A total of 1,004 individuals (median age, 6.5 years; 53.5% male) with diverse ancestral backgrounds (51.8% non-majority European) were assessed from June 2016 to September 2021. The diagnostic yield of cGS was 41.4% (416/1,004), with individuals from LMIC sites 1.7 times more likely to receive a positive test result compared to HIC sites (LMIC 56.5% [195/345] vs. HIC 33.5% [221/659], OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.4, p < 0.0001). A change in diagnostic evaluation occurred in 76.9% (514/668) of individuals. Change of management, inclusive of specialty referrals, imaging and testing, therapeutic interventions, and palliative care, was reported in 41.4% (285/694) of individuals, which increased to 69.2% (480/694) when genetic counseling and avoidance of additional testing were also included. Individuals from LMIC sites were as likely as their HIC counterparts to experience a change in diagnostic evaluation (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.1-∞, p = 0.05) and change of management (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.3, p = 0.49). Increased access to genomic testing may support diagnostic equity and the reduction of global health care disparities.

Motivations and expectations of parents seeking genetic testing for their children with ocular genetic disease.

BACKGROUND: To date, almost 600 genes have been associated with ocular genetic diseases. As these discoveries are made, clinical genetic testing continues to grow and become a more common element in the diagnostic workup of children with blindness and reduced vision. However, few studies have explored the motivations of parents of pediatric patients for pursuing genetic testing or the topics they would like to discuss during their visit. This study explored these gaps in the existing knowledge of clinical care for children with vision loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We distributed a REDCap survey to parents of pediatric patients in the Indiana University Ocular Genetics Clinic and through the Foundation Fighting Blindness MyRetinaTracker database to examine factors that motivate families to undergo genetic testing, topics they are interested in discussing, and satisfaction with their current care. RESULTS: Parents were primarily motivated by the opportunity to learn about their child's prognosis, formal diagnosis, and possible treatment options. Parents were most interested in discussing prognosis, adaptations for vision loss, and testing logistics. Parents reported satisfaction with the care received; however, less than half were very satisfied with their understanding of prognosis and the support resources provided. CONCLUSIONS: Parents seem to be generally satisfied by the care from their ocular genetics team. However, families' desires are not being fully met, especially with information about prognosis and support resources. As the field of ocular genetics continues to grow, it is important we improve these offerings and optimize care for this patient population.

An Adolescent with a Rare De Novo Distal Trisomy 6p and Distal Monosomy 6q Chromosomal Combination.

We report on a 12-year-old female with both a partial duplication and deletion involving chromosome 6. The duplication involves 6p25.3p24.3 (7.585 Mb) while the deletion includes 6q27q27 (6.244 Mb). This chromosomal abnormality is also described as distal trisomy 6p and distal monosomy 6q. The patient has a Chiari II malformation, hydrocephalus, agenesis of the corpus callosum, microcephaly, bilateral renal duplicated collecting system, scoliosis, and myelomeningocele associated with a neurogenic bladder and bladder reflux. Additional features have included seizures, feeding dysfunction, failure to thrive, sleep apnea, global developmental delay, intellectual disability, and absent speech. To our knowledge, our report is just the sixth case in the literature with concomitant distal 6p duplication and distal 6q deletion. Although a majority of chromosomal duplication-deletion cases have resulted from a parental pericentric inversion, the parents of our case have normal chromosomes. This is the first reported de novo case of distal 6p duplication and distal 6q deletion. Alternate explanations for the origin of the patient's chromosome abnormalities include parental gonadal mosaicism, nonallelic homologous recombination, or potentially intrachromosomal transposition of the telomeres of chromosome 6. Nonpaternity was considered but ruled out by whole exome sequencing analysis.