Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Ther ; 29(4): e385-e393, 2022 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31833874

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal monitoring strategy for anticoagulation management in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains a clinical controversy. The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Anticoagulation Guidelines suggest that multiple anticoagulation assays may be needed but do not specify a preferred management strategy. STUDY QUESTION: In adult ECMO patients, which anticoagulation assays demonstrate the highest correlation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) dose requirements? STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients cannulated to ECMO between February 2013 and July 2015. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the correlation between activated clotting time (ACT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and anti-Xa and UFH dose. Secondary outcomes included correlations between anticoagulation assays. Correlations were calculated for the entire cohort, with subgroup analysis of venoarterial and venovenous ECMO patients. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in the analysis, 26 initially cannulated to venoarterial ECMO and 22 to veno-venous ECMO. The median duration of ECMO therapy was 7 days. Mean UFH requirements were 1149 units/h or 15.3 units/kg/h. Total UFH dose was most correlated with anti-Xa levels (r = 0.467), whereas weight-based heparin dose was most correlated with aPTT (0.405). For correlations between anticoagulation assays, anti-Xa and aPTT were more highly correlated with each other (r = 0.633) compared with ACT. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients requiring ECMO, anti-Xa and aPTT monitoring were correlated more closely with UFH dosing than ACT.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Heparina , Adulto , Anticoagulantes , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular , Humanos , Tempo de Tromboplastina Parcial , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Ann Pharmacother ; 55(2): 181-186, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32686466

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the incidence of adverse events associated with administering lacosamide by intravenous push (IVP) compared with IV piggyback (IVPB). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to compare the safety profile, including cardiovascular effects, sedative effects, and IV site reactions of IVP and IVPB lacosamide administration. METHODS: A retrospective pre/post cohort analysis comparing patients who received lacosamide via IVP and IVPB was conducted. Safety end points included hypotension, bradycardia, medication-related sedation, and IV site reactions. The relationship between patient characteristics and the incidence of safety end points was analyzed using the Student t-test and χ2 test as appropriate. RESULTS: Bradycardia occurred after 0.19% of IVP administrations and 1.09% of IVPB administrations assessed (P = 0.07). Hypotension was observed in 3.16% of IVP administrations compared to 1.59% in the IVPB cohort (P = 0.12). Post lacosamide-related sedation was noted in 11.32% and 11.68% of the IVP and IVPB cohorts, respectively (P = 0.87). Infusion site reaction rates of 1.80% and 0.84% were documented in the IVP and IVPB cohorts, respectively (P = 0.33). Of note, only 1 adverse event required clinical intervention. One 200-mg dose in the IVP cohort required a fluid bolus postadministration. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: IVP lacosamide was associated with a similar incidence of cardiovascular, neurological, and infusion site-related adverse events compared with IVPB, in which nearly every adverse event was deemed clinically insignificant. Lacosamide administered via IVP may be considered a safe alternative method of administration in the acute care setting.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Lacosamida/administração & dosagem , Lacosamida/efeitos adversos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Bradicardia/induzido quimicamente , Bradicardia/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Sedação Consciente , Feminino , Humanos , Hipotensão/induzido quimicamente , Hipotensão/epidemiologia , Incidência , Infusões Intravenosas , Injeções Intravenosas , Lacosamida/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
3.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 60(4): 598-601, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31932197

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Intravenous (IV) thiamine, administered using both diluted solution for infusion and undiluted solution for IV push, is used to correct low levels of thiamine. Although thiamine has a good safety profile, its IV administration is associated with rare cases of anaphylaxis. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the incidence of anaphylaxis and IV site reactions associated with IV push thiamine. DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective chart review was performed using electronic health records. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients who received undiluted IV push thiamine between June 1, 2015, and July 31, 2017, were included. Patient demographics, IV access site, allergy history, and antihistaminic medication use before thiamine administration were collected. OUTCOME MEASURES: Anaphylaxis was assessed while infiltration and phlebitis were evaluated using a standardized institutional grading system. All documented adverse events were adjudicated with the Naranjo Nomogram for adverse drug reaction assessment. RESULTS: A total of 8606 administrations in 2595 patients were evaluated; 5560 doses were administered peripherally, 1643 doses were administered centrally, and the line of administration was not documented for the remaining doses. Administrations included 7605 doses of 100 mg, 433 of 200 mg, 549 of 250 mg, and 19 of 500 mg. No anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions were observed. A total of 26 injection site reactions (0.30%) were noted in 19 patients (phlebitis, 12 events and infiltration, 14 events). Assessment with the Naranjo Nomogram classified 18 reactions to have a possible likelihood and 8 reactions to have a probable likelihood of being caused by IV push thiamine administration. CONCLUSION: Administration of IV push thiamine was not associated with any anaphylactic event and had a low incidence of IV site reactions. IV push thiamine in doses up to 250 mg appeared to be safe. There may be an indication for its safe administration with doses up to 500 mg, although more research is needed.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Tiamina , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tiamina/efeitos adversos , Tiamina/uso terapêutico
4.
Am J Ther ; 26(1): e103-e109, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27340909

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus and propofol are both independently associated with the development of hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) during therapy. To date, there are no published reports describing synergistic or additive drug interaction resulting in HTG with concomitant use of these medications. STUDY QUESTION: To identify the occurrence of HTG in patients receiving concomitant sirolimus and propofol infusion therapy. METHODS: Adult patients receiving sirolimus and a continuous propofol infusion for at least 12 hours from January 2005 to August 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Data included Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, weight, length of propofol therapy, and baseline triglyceride (TG) concentrations. The major outcome was incidence of HTG (TGs ≥500 mg/dL). Minor outcomes included the change in TG concentration from therapy initiation and manifestations of propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS). RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in the analysis, with 8 (50%) of the patients developing HTG. The patients in this case series had the following mean values: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 20.2 ± 5.3, weight of 76.3 ± 21.2 kg, and baseline TG concentrations of 181.3 ± 89.7 mg/dL. Indications for sirolimus therapy included hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (n = 15) and heart transplantation (n = 1). Mean length of propofol infusion was 99.8 ± 88.5 hours. The mean TG concentration during infusion was 515.6 ± 468.1 mg/dL. Fourteen (87.5%) patients had an increase of ≥100 mg/dL, 12 (75%) patients had an increase of ≥200 mg/dL, and 6 (37.5%) patients had an increase of ≥300 mg/dL in TG concentrations during therapy. Eleven patients developed one manifestation of PRIS, excluding HTG, and one patient had more than 2 new onset PRIS manifestations during propofol therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of propofol and sirolimus can potentially result in HTG, which may warrant more frequent monitoring. Further analysis is needed to examine the mechanism and clinical impact of this interaction.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal/terapia , Hipertrigliceridemia/induzido quimicamente , Síndrome da Infusão de Propofol/epidemiologia , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Sirolimo/efeitos adversos , Triglicerídeos/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Interações Medicamentosas , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertrigliceridemia/sangue , Hipertrigliceridemia/diagnóstico , Hipertrigliceridemia/epidemiologia , Incidência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome da Infusão de Propofol/sangue , Síndrome da Infusão de Propofol/diagnóstico , Síndrome da Infusão de Propofol/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Am J Ther ; 24(4): e386-e392, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26280291

RESUMO

Although some data suggest favorable outcomes with use of etanercept for treatment of transplantation-related lung injury, concerns, such as development of new infections, still exist. The objective of this study was to describe the usage of etanercept at our institution and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etanercept for this indication. Adult patients receiving at least one dose of etanercept for the treatment of pulmonary complications in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplant from January 2005 to December 2010 were retrospectively evaluated. Outcomes included hospital mortality, incidence of new infection after etanercept administration, and time from administration of first dose of etanercept to infection. Seventeen patients who received etanercept at our institution from January 2005 to December 2010 were included. Four patients (24%) survived their hospital stay, and 3 patients (18%) were alive at both 100 days and 1 year from the initiation of etanercept therapy. Four patients (24%) developed at least one confirmed new infection after the initiation of etanercept therapy. Both moderate and long-term survival in our cohort was low. Caution and careful assessment of the risks and benefits of therapy should be taken before initiation of etanercept for transplantation-related lung injury.


Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Etanercepte/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/etiologia , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/mortalidade , Adulto , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Doenças Transmissíveis/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/antagonistas & inibidores , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Transplante Homólogo/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Ann Pharmacother ; 50(2): 106-12, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26668204

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Flolan (iFLO) and Veletri (iVEL) are 2 inhaled epoprostenol formulations. There is no published literature comparing these formulations in critically ill patients with refractory hypoxemia. OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy, safety, and cost outcomes in patients who received either iFLO or iVEL for hypoxic respiratory failure. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of adult, mechanically ventilated patients receiving iFLO or iVEL for improvement in oxygenation. The primary end point was the change in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio after 1 hour of pulmonary vasodilator therapy. Secondary end points assessed were intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, duration of study therapy, duration of mechanical ventilation, mortality, incidence of adverse events, and cost. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included (iFLO = 52; iVEL = 52). More iFLO patients had acute respiratory distress syndrome compared with the iVEL group (61.5 vs 34.6%; P = 0.01). There was no difference in the change in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio after 1 hour of therapy (33.04 ± 36.9 vs 31.47 ± 19.92; P = 0.54) in the iFLO and iVEL groups, respectively. Patients who received iVEL had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (P < 0.001) and ICU LOS (P < 0.001) but not hospital LOS (P = 0.86) and duration of therapy (P = 0.36). No adverse events were attributed to pulmonary vasodilator therapy, and there was no difference in cost. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference between iFLO and iVEL when comparing the change in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, safety, and cost in hypoxic, critically ill patients. There were differences in secondary outcomes, likely a result of differences in underlying indication for inhaled epoprostenol.


Assuntos
Epoprostenol/administração & dosagem , Hipóxia/tratamento farmacológico , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Insuficiência Respiratória/tratamento farmacológico , Tetrazóis/administração & dosagem , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , Idoso , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração Artificial , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico
7.
J Med Syst ; 40(1): 24, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26547844

RESUMO

The objective of this analysis is to describe the utilization metrics of a pharmacy clinical surveillance system (PCSS) at a tertiary, academic medical center.We performed a retrospective database analysis assessing rule-based alerts (RBA), interventions and pharmacist communication notes documented in the PCSS from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. Reports were generated on 92 unique RBAs sent to clinicians for evaluation. Metrics assessed included the number of RBAs that were triggered, clinically evaluated, intervened on by pharmacists, and therapeutic category of interventions. Pharmacy communication notes were also evaluated.A total of 399,979 RBAs were triggered through the PCSS. During that time, pharmacists documented a total of 17,733 interventions. The most common RBAs were related to lab abnormalities (132,487; 33 %) and anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy (126,425; 32.1 %). Interventions were most frequently related to RBAs regarding anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy (6412; 36 %) and antimicrobial therapy (3320; 19 %). Pharmacist communication was most commonly related to clarification of medication and lab orders, and therapeutic drug monitoring.Based on utilization metrics presented, the implementation of a PCSS has successfully generated RBAs to aid pharmacists in clinical practice and improved departmental documentation and communication. Further analysis is warranted to assess the impact of the RBAs, interventions, and communication notes on outcomes such as hospital cost and adverse drug events.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Informação em Farmácia Clínica/organização & administração , Comunicação , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Documentação , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 55(2): 198-202, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25699989

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of a pharmacy intern distribution coordinator position and its impact on the intern's professional development. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: In 2009, our institution implemented a pharmacy intern distribution coordinator position, which was previously staffed by a pharmacist. Interns, who are in their first through fourth professional year, take the lead in the medication distribution process while under the direct supervision of a pharmacist. The intern adjudicates the medication distribution process by ensuring proper processing, filling and timely delivery of the medications, as well as triaging inventory issues and maintaining open communication with the pharmacists about any medication issues. Additionally, the intern can make clinical interventions during the various checkpoints in the final verification process and answer drug information questions for fellow medical professionals. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Pharmacy intern resources and development are maximized via staffing in a medication distribution coordinator position previously staffed by a pharmacist. By adapting to the role of pharmacist early on in one's career, pharmacy interns are provided with a valuable opportunity to grow professionally. The position can foster the development of pharmacotherapy knowledge, communication skills, leadership experience, time management, and critical thinking by allowing pharmacy interns to practice at the top of their licensure. CONCLUSION: Our pharmacy intern distribution coordinator position provides interns with a professional development opportunity by assuming enhanced roles and responsibilities in a hospital pharmacy department. The expansion of the pharmacy intern's role can increase pharmacy department resources and provide a valuable platform for their development. Institutions should seek to maximize the opportunities for pharmacy interns to work at the peak of their licensure.


Assuntos
Hospitais de Ensino , Residências em Farmácia , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Boston , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Hospitais de Ensino/organização & administração , Humanos , Descrição de Cargo , Licenciamento em Farmácia , Modelos Organizacionais , Residências em Farmácia/organização & administração , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Papel Profissional , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Desenvolvimento de Pessoal , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Fluxo de Trabalho
9.
Ann Pharmacother ; 47(10): 1260-5, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24259689

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: No previous studies exist examining implementation of an institution-wide guideline and order set for hyperglycemic emergencies (diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA] and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state [HHS]). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of an institutional guideline and order set for hyperglycemic emergencies. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study evaluated patients with a diagnosis of DKA or HHS. Two time periods were evaluated: phase 1 (PRE) assessed practice preguideline implementation, and phase 2 (POST) assessed practice postguideline and order set introduction. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients (91 PRE and 81 POST) were included in the analysis. There was no difference in the mean hospital length of stay (LOS) in the PRE versus POST groups (5.2 ± 4 vs 5.9 ± 8.6 days, P = .49). The mean intensive care unit (ICU) LOS was shorter in the POST group (64.8 ± 19 vs 37.1 ± 74.8 hours, P < .01). The POST group had an increase in frequency of assessments for clearance of urinary ketones (18 vs 33.3%, P = .03) and ß-hydroxybutyrate (16 vs 37%, P < .01). Frequency of point-of-care glucose testing (12.5 ± 4.6 vs 15.1 ± 4.7, P < .01) and time to anion gap closure (13 ± 9 vs 9.3 ± 7.4 hours, P < .01) improved in the POST group. There was no difference in the number of patients experiencing hypoglycemia or hypokalemia between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an institutional guideline and order set for hyperglycemic emergencies decreased ICU LOS and time to anion gap closure, with no difference in rates of hypoglycemia.


Assuntos
Cetoacidose Diabética/diagnóstico , Guias como Assunto , Hiperglicemia/diagnóstico , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Centros de Atenção Terciária
10.
J Pharm Pract ; 36(2): 281-285, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34384303

RESUMO

Background: Recent shortages of intravenous (IV) fluids have resulted in healthcare systems converting administration of many medications from IV piggyback (IVPB) to IV push (IVP). Administering medications via IVP presents numerous advantages; however, IV site reactions such as phlebitis and infiltration may occur. Objective: The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the infusion site safety of ertapenem given as peripheral IVP compared to IVPB in adult patients. Methods: This was an institutional review board-approved, single-center, retrospective study. Patients, ages 18 or older, receiving IV ertapenem were identified. The major endpoints analyzed were IV site reactions including phlebitis and infiltration. The Naranjo Nomogram was utilized to assess the causality of the reactions to determine the likelihood of whether the event was caused by the medication itself or other factors. Results: To date, 283 administrations (92 patients) in the IVP group and 319 administrations (82 patients) in the IVPB group were analyzed. There were 13 IV site reactions compared to 8 in the IVP vs IVPB group, respectively (P-value = 0.16). Ten of the events in the IVP group were deemed "possible" and 2 deemed "doubtful," while the remaining event was considered "probable" per the Naranjo Nomogram. Of the events in the IVPB group, all 8 were found to be "possible." Conclusion: The administration of IVP ertapenem showed comparable rates of infusion site reactions compared to IVPB. Implementation of IVP ertapenem appears to be associated with infusion site safety similar to IVPB and should be considered safe to administer.


Assuntos
Flebite , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Ertapenem/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infusões Intravenosas , Injeções Intravenosas , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Flebite/etiologia
11.
J Pharm Pract ; 36(1): 46-52, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34098782

RESUMO

The drug supply chain has suffered many interruptions over the past decade. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated an already fragile infrastructure for supplying critical medications to hospitals and health-systems. The purpose of this paper is to provide insight to the history, thought-processes, and response to critical medication shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on hydromorphone infusions and the action steps taken to engage in non-sterile to sterile (NSTS) compounding. Over a period of 6 weeks, we compounded 1,613 NSTS hydromorphone infusion bags. All lots were cleared for sterility, particulate, potency, and endotoxin testing by an outside FDA registered laboratory. We did not have any safety reports filed specific to the NSTS compounded hydromorphone infusion bags. Over a period of 15 weeks, 715 infusions were consumed. The drug supply chain suffers frequent interruptions and critical shortages, particularly in times of a natural disaster or a global pandemic. Non-sterile to sterile compounding is often associated with risks of inaccuracies, impurities, and contamination. There are instances in which non-sterile to sterile compounding is appropriate and should be considered in times of drug shortages to support the care of hospitalized patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infertilidade , Humanos , Pandemias , Hidromorfona , Composição de Medicamentos
12.
Drug Saf ; 45(1): 19-26, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34716562

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Medication administration via intravenous push presents multiple potential advantages; however, there may be an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. In 2020, Brigham and Women's Hospital changed levetiracetam intravenous administration to intravenous push (IVP). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis was to compare the safety profile of IVP to intravenous piggyback (IVPB) levetiracetam administration. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, single-center, pre-post analysis was performed between 1 November, 2019 and 30 May, 2020. The electronic health record was used to identify all administrations of intravenous levetiracetam greater than 1000 mg in patients ≥ 18 years old. The major safety outcomes included hypotension, bradycardia, drug-induced sedation, and intravenous site reactions such as phlebitis and infiltration. The major efficiency outcome was the time from pharmacy order verification to first-dose administration. RESULTS: A total of 498 administrations in 162 patients were included in the analysis: 252 administrations in 84 patients in the IVP group and 246 administrations in 78 patients in the IVPB group. The incidence of bradycardia was 7 vs 3 (3.2% vs 1.5%, p = 0.34); hypotension 10 vs 6 (5.2% vs 3.5%, p = 0.44); sedation 21 vs 36 (19.3% vs 27.9%, p = 0.12); and peripheral IV site reactions 0 vs 1 (0% vs 0.6%, p = 0.39) in the IVP vs IVPB groups, respectively. The median time between order verification and first-dose administration was significantly reduced in the IVP vs IVPB group (23.5 vs 55 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous push levetiracetam administration of doses up to 4000 mg was associated with a similar incidence of cardiovascular, sedation, and infusion site-related adverse events compared to IVPB and resulted in a significant reduction in time to first-dose administration. Intravenous push levetiracetam in doses as high as 4000 mg may be considered safe with appropriate monitoring.


Assuntos
Bradicardia , Hipotensão , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Administração Intravenosa , Adolescente , Bradicardia/induzido quimicamente , Bradicardia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipotensão/induzido quimicamente , Hipotensão/epidemiologia , Infusões Intravenosas , Levetiracetam/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
J Pharm Pract ; 34(6): 908-912, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32638650

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost, workflow, and safety of implementing a vial transfer device system. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, pharmacy systems and electronic health record reports identified high-volume and high-cost medications prepared by a Vial2Bag® (V2B) system from July 2017 to June 2018. The major outcome was the extrapolated yearly cost avoidance (EYCA) from utilization of a V2B system, calculated by subtracting total costs of the V2B system from total cost of ready-to-use products and locally compounded sterile products. Secondary outcomes included a workflow and safety analysis. RESULTS: Implementing a V2B system led to a total EYCA of $2 295 261. A total of 283 209 potential V2B units were available for dispensing from automated dispensing systems and 41 082 yearly sterile product room units were avoided. A 0.02% safety report incidence per V2B administration was calculated at our institution. CONCLUSION: Use of a V2B system resulted in a substantial cost avoidance compared to purchasing commercial products and preparing locally compounded sterile products. The V2B system appears to be a safe addition to further optimize workflow but may require further investigation in prospective analyses.


Assuntos
Preparações Farmacêuticas , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Composição de Medicamentos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fluxo de Trabalho
14.
J Pharm Pract ; 33(4): 523-532, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31057085

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objective of this article is to discuss the pharmacology, side effects, and clinical application of vasoactive therapy in the management of adult septic shock. SUMMARY: Sepsis is one of the most common reasons for admission to an intensive care unit with the incidence estimated to be greater than 750 000 cases per year in the United States. Clinicians should understand the basic pharmacology of available vasoactive agents to allow for routine and complex management of septic shock. CONCLUSION: While advances in research, identification, and early implementation of best practices for the treatment of sepsis has reduced mortality, rates remain high. Vasopressors and inotropes remain part of the core therapeutic modalities of sepsis management. Norepinephrine is the first-line vasopressor of choice for septic shock, though secondary vasopressors can be used depending on the patient's circumstances.


Assuntos
Choque Séptico , Adulto , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Norepinefrina , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/tratamento farmacológico , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico
15.
Crit Care ; 13(5): R169, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19874582

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: While propofol is associated with an infusion syndrome (PRIS) that may cause death, the incidence of PRIS is unknown. Determining the incidence of PRIS and the frequency of PRIS-related clinical manifestations are key steps prior to the completion of any controlled studies investigating PRIS. This prospective, multicenter study sought to determine the incidence of PRIS and PRIS-related clinical manifestations in a large cohort of critically ill adults prescribed propofol. METHODS: Critically ill adults from 11 academic medical centers administered an infusion of propofol for [>or=] 24 hours were monitored at baseline and then on a daily basis until propofol was discontinued for the presence of 11 different PRIS-associated clinical manifestations and risk factors derived from 83 published case reports of PRIS. RESULTS: Among 1017 patients [medical (35%), neurosurgical (25%)], PRIS (defined as metabolic acidosis plus cardiac dysfunction and [>or=] 1 of: rhabdomyolysis, hypertriglyceridemia or renal failure occurring after the start of propofol therapy) developed in 11 (1.1%) patients an average of 3 (1-6) [median (range)] days after the start of propofol. While most (91%) of the patients who developed PRIS were receiving a vasopressor (80% initiated after the start of propofol therapy), few received a propofol dose >83 mcg/kg/min (18%) or died (18%). Compared to the 1006 patients who did not develop PRIS, the APACHE II score (25 +/- 6 vs 20 +/- 7, P = 0.01) was greater in patients with PRIS but both the duration of propofol use (P = 0.43) and ICU length of stay (P = 0.82) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Despite using a conservative definition for PRIS, and only considering new-onset PRIS clinical manifestations, the incidence of PRIS slightly exceeds 1%. Future controlled studies focusing on evaluating whether propofol manifests the derangements of critical illness more frequently than other sedatives will need to be large. These studies should also investigate the mechanism(s) and risk factors for PRIS.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Estado Terminal , Incidência , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Idoso , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Arritmias Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Síndrome
16.
Sci Transl Med ; 11(483)2019 03 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30867323

RESUMO

Oral forms of medications contain "inactive" ingredients to enhance their physical properties. Using data analytics, we characterized the abundance and complexity of inactive ingredients in approved medications. A majority of medications contain ingredients that could cause adverse reactions, underscoring the need to maximize the tolerability and safety of medications and their inactive ingredients.


Assuntos
Preparações Farmacêuticas/administração & dosagem , Preparações Farmacêuticas/análise , Administração Oral , Animais , Composição de Medicamentos , Excipientes/efeitos adversos , Humanos
17.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 64(1): 37-44, 2007 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17189578

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A review highlighting the application of sedatives and analgesics in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, with a focus on the use of dexmedetomidine, is presented. SUMMARY: Relevant and applicable clinical trials that resulted from a search of the literature from 1966 to July 2006 using key search terms such as dexmedetomidine, intensive care unit, sedation, delirium, and analgesia were evaluated. Many agents have been evaluated in the search of the optimal regimen for sedation and analgesia in the ICU, including opioids, benzodiazepines, propofol, and antipsychotic agents. Dexmedetomidine has demonstrated efficacy as a sedative analgesic on the basis of its ability to lower opioid, benzodiazepine, and propofol requirements in clinical trials. The role of dexmedetomidine in ICU clinical practice is limited because of a lack of mortality and other morbidity endpoints, such as ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, time to extubation, long-term complications after discharge from the ICU, and delirium. The most commonly reported adverse effects of dexmedetomidine are secondary to its effects as an alpha(2)-receptor agonist and are cardiac in nature. A detailed cost analysis may be warranted to justify the relatively high acquisition cost of dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine may be an effective agent for ICU sedation and analgesia. However, the lack of clinically relevant endpoints in trials, the concern about adverse cardiovascular effects, and the relatively high acquisition cost of this drug limit its use to a select number of patients who may benefit from its distinguished mechanism of action.


Assuntos
Dexmedetomidina/uso terapêutico , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos
18.
J Crit Care ; 37: 1-6, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27610584

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of sedative, analgesic, and neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 2-year, prospective, observational study of adult intensive care unit patients on ECMO support for more than 48hours. RESULTS: We analyzed 32 patients, including 15 receiving VA (venoarterial) ECMO and 17 VV (venovenous) ECMO. The median daily dose of benzodiazepines (midazolam equivalents) was 24mg, and the median daily dose of opioids (fentanyl equivalents) was 3875 µg. There was a moderate negative correlation between the day of ECMO and the median daily benzodiazepine dose (r=-0.5515) and a very weak negative correlation for the median daily opioid dose (r=-0.0053). On average, patients were sedated to Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores between 0 and -1. Continuous infusions of opioids, benzodiazepines, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and NMBAs were administered on 404 (85.1%), 199 (41.9%), 95 (20%), 32 (6.7%), and 60 (12.6%) ECMO days, respectively. Patients in the VA arm received a continuous infusion opioid (96.4% vs 81.6% days; P<.001) and benzodiazepine (58.2% vs 37.0% days; P<.001) more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Patients received relatively low doses of sedatives and analgesics while at a light level of sedation on average. Patients rarely required neuromuscular blockade.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Bloqueadores Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Midazolam/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Propofol/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos
19.
Pharmacotherapy ; 26(2): 214-28, 2006 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16466326

RESUMO

Despite published evidence supporting glycemic control in critically ill patients, achieving euglycemia remains a problem in the intensive care units (ICUs) of many institutions. Clinicians seeking to implement the findings of published evidence in their practice face many potential barriers that make euglycemia difficult to achieve in patients in the ICU. Developing a comprehensive understanding of the many barriers to ICU glucose control can aide clinicians in attempting to change practice and improve patient outcomes. Barriers to ICU glucose control include the role of different health professionals in glucose management, communication among health care professionals, guidelines, protocols, ICU culture, fear of hypoglycemia, glucose monitoring, education, systems analysis, health care resources, nutritional needs, and drug utilization. By ensuring compliance, changing ICU culture, developing guidelines and protocols, and incorporating a multidisciplinary approach, clinicians can achieve glycemic control in the critically ill population and improve patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Glicemia/metabolismo , Cuidados Críticos , Hiperglicemia/terapia , Estado Terminal , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/diagnóstico , Hiperglicemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Estado Nutricional , Equilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico
20.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 72(23 Suppl 3): S145-9, 2015 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26582300

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Results of a study to implement targeted interventions to increase the number of documented i.v.-to-oral conversions and to increase cost savings from these documented conversions are reported. METHODS: A before-and-after analysis of i.v.-to-oral conversions at an academic medical center following the addition of targeted interventions to an existing pharmacist-initiated conversion program was conducted. Targeted interventions included staff training on i.v.-to-oral conversions, implementation of a new documentation system, and feedback to the staff. Major outcomes studied included the total number of i.v.-to-oral conversions documented per month and the cost savings generated by these conversions. RESULTS: The mean ± S.D. number of i.v.-to-oral conversions documented per month significantly increased after the implementation of targeted interventions (25 ± 9 before and 57 ± 6 after implementation, p < 0.0001). There was a nonsignificant increase in cost savings generated per month after implementation of the interventions. The most commonly converted medication was pantoprazole. Conversions of levetiracetam generated the highest cost savings. CONCLUSION: Addition of several targeted interventions to an existing pharmacist-initiated i.v.-to-oral conversion program led to a significant increase in the total number of documented conversions.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/métodos , Administração Intravenosa/métodos , Administração Oral , Redução de Custos/métodos , Eficiência Organizacional , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/métodos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Administração Intravenosa/economia , Eficiência Organizacional/economia , Humanos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/economia , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA