A Phase I Study of Binimetinib (MEK162) Combined with Pexidartinib (PLX3397) in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

LESSONS LEARNED: The combination of pexidartinib and binimetinib was safe and tolerable and demonstrated encouraging signs of efficacy in two patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) refractory to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).Molecular profiling of GISTs at diagnosis and upon progression may provide insight into the mechanisms of response or resistance to targeted therapies.Additional trials are needed to further explore combined KIT and MEK inhibition in treatment-naïve and TKI-refractory patients with advanced GIST. BACKGROUND: Nearly all patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) develop resistance to imatinib, and subsequent treatments have limited efficacy. Dual inhibition of KIT and MAPK pathways has synergistic antitumor activity in preclinical GIST models. METHODS: This was an investigator-initiated, phase I, dose escalation study of the MEK inhibitor binimetinib combined with pexidartinib, a potent inhibitor of CSF1R, KIT, and FLT3, in patients with advanced or metastatic GIST who progressed on imatinib. The primary endpoint was phase II dose determination; secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, and efficacy. An expansion cohort to further evaluate safety and efficacy was planned. RESULTS: Two patients were treated at dose level one (binimetinib 30 mg b.i.d. and pexidartinib 400 mg every morning and 200 mg every evening), after which the study was terminated by the manufacturer. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported, and treatment was well tolerated. The only grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was asymptomatic elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK). Both patients had a best response of stable disease (SD) by RECIST. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.1 and 14.6 months, respectively, in one patient with five prior lines of therapy. The second patient with NF1-mutant GIST had a 27% decrease in tumor burden by RECIST and remains on study after 19 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: Pexidartinib combined with binimetinib was tolerable, and meaningful clinical activity was observed in two imatinib-refractory patients.

Size and Location are the Most Important Risk Factors for Malignant Behavior in Resected Solitary Fibrous Tumors.

PURPOSE: While previously thought to be clinically indolent, recent data suggest significant late metastatic capacity of solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs). We define prognostic factors for recurrence and disease-specific death (DSD) in resected primary SFTs. METHODS: Resected primary SFTs from 1982 to 2015 were identified from a prospective, single institutional database. Risk factors for local (LR) and distant recurrence (DR), and DSD were assessed using competing risk analysis. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients with median follow-up of 6.1 (0.1-22) years were included. Five- and 10-year cumulative DSD was 9 and 11%, respectively. Size greater than the median 8 cm, gender, location, and complete gross resection were significantly associated with DSD (p < 0.05). Five- and 10-year cumulative risk (CR) of LR was 4 and 7%, whereas 5- and 10-year CR of DR was 13 and 16%, respectively. LR was associated with location (p = 0.02) and tumor size (p = 0.02), and DR was associated with size (p < 0.01). Histopathologic classification did not predict long-term behavior with both malignant and benign tumors demonstrating capacity for DR and associated death. Tumors in the thoracic cavity and abdomen/retroperitoneum presented the greatest risk of DR (16 and 27% 10-year CR). On multivariate analysis, size ≥ 8 cm (hazard ratio 2.89, p = 0.05) and tumor location in chest or abdominal/retroperitoneal cavity (hazard ratio 2.68, p = 0.01) significantly impacted DSD. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence is highly associated with DSD and events occur as late as 16 years after initial presentation, including in patients with initially considered benign tumors. Patients with large (≥ 8 cm) tumors in the chest or abdominal/retroperitoneal cavity are at greatest risk.

Localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma: improved knowledge with unchanged survival over time.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to define whether survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS), stratified for known risk factors, has improved over the last 20 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1982 to December 2001, 1,706 patients with primary and recurrent STS of the extremities were treated at our institution and were prospectively followed. From this cohort, we selected 1,261 patients who underwent complete macroscopic resection and had one of the following histopathologies: fibrosarcoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, or synovial sarcoma. Median follow-up was 55 months. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were analyzed as prognostic factors. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-specific actuarial survival was 79% (78% for patients treated from 1982 to 1986, 79% for patients treated from 1986 to 1991, 79% for patients treated from 1992 to 1996, and 85% for patients treated from 1997 to 2001; P = not significant). For high-risk patients (high-grade, > 10 cm, deep tumors; n = 247), 5-year disease-specific survival was 51% (50% for patients treated from 1982 to 1986, 45% for patients treated from 1986 to 1991, 52% for patients treated from 1992 to 1996, and 61% for patients treated from 1997 to 2001; P = not significant). Tumor depth, size, grade, microscopic margin status, patient age, presentation status (primary tumor versus local recurrence), location (proximal versus distal), and certain histopathologic subtypes were significant prognostic factors for disease-specific survival on multivariate analysis; however, time period of treatment was not. CONCLUSION: Prognosis of patients with extremity STS, stratified for known risk factors, has not improved over the last 20 years, indicating that current therapy has reached the limits of efficacy.

Long-term results with resection of radiation-induced soft tissue sarcomas.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation therapy is increasingly used as adjuvant treatment of many childhood and adult malignancies. Radiation-induced sarcoma is a well recognized if uncommon event. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence and long-term outcome for patients who develop radiation-induced sarcomas. METHODS: From July 1982 to December 2001, 4884 adult patients with sarcoma were admitted and treated at our institution and recorded in a prospective database. There were 123 (2.5%) patients who had radiation-induced soft tissue sarcomas. Survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were tested for their prognostic significance by log rank and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The median interval between radiation and development of sarcoma was 103 (6 to 534) months. In 114 patients with radiation-induced sarcoma who underwent curative resection, the 5-year actuarial survival was 41%, with a median survival of 48 months at a median follow-up of 36 months for survivors. The most common malignancy for which radiation was used was breast cancer (29%), followed by lymphoma (16%) and prostate cancer (15%). Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (23%) was the most common histologic diagnosis, followed by fibrosarcoma (15%) and angiosarcoma (15%). High-grade tumors (n = 85; 79%), age > 60 years (n = 61; 50%), and gross positive resection margin (n = 36; 32%) were predictive of poor sarcoma-specific survival on univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing utilization of adjuvant radiation therapy, especially for early-stage breast cancer mandates long-term follow-up to detect radiation-induced sarcoma. Surgical resection remains the primary therapy, but 5-year survival remains approximately 40%.

Conventional hemangiopericytoma: modern analysis of outcome.

BACKGROUND: Hemangiopericytoma (HPC) is a rare vascular tumor, and pathologic distinction from synovial sarcoma and solitary fibrous tumor is a significant problem due to shared histologic features. In the current report the authors defined the clinical behavior and prognosis for patients with HPC. METHODS: Between July 1982 and February 1998, 62 patients with a diagnosis of primary, recurrent, or metastatic HPC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The pathology of all cases for which material was available (57 cases) was re-reviewed for histologic confirmation of the HPC diagnosis. Using strict pathologic criteria, including immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, tumors from 25 of 57 patients qualified for the diagnosis of conventional hemangiopericytoma; those tumors formed the basis of the current report. Survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: At the time of initial presentation, 19 patients had primary tumors, 3 had locally recurrent disease, and 3 had metastatic disease. The most frequent anatomic sites for HPC were the extremities, the pelvis, and the head and neck, accounting for 80% of the total cases. The median followup (n = 25) was 49 months (range, 1 to 160 months). The two and five year overall survival rates (n = 25) were 93% and 86% respectively. The disease-specific survival was 86% at last followup. Patients undergoing complete resection (n = 16) showed a 100% median survival at 60 months. CONCLUSIONS: At present, complete tumor resection for patients with conventional HPC is recommended. However, considering the favorable outcome in this disease, the authors caution against performing operations that may potentially cause loss of function or are limb threatening.