Intensive Care Unit Caregivers Perception of Patient Discomfort: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Being hospitalized in an intensive care unit ICU often involves pain and discomfort. While pain is commonly alleviated with analgesics, discomfort is more difficult to diagnose and treat, thus potentially leading to incorrect analgesic administration. AIM: To describe intensive care unit practitioners' perceptions of discomfort in the ICU, and their methods to discern between pain and non-pain discomfort. METHODS: Twenty-five intensive care unit practitioners (7 doctors and 18 nurses) were interviewed from medical and general intensive care units at one institution in Jerusalem, Israel. Data collection was performed using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcriptions were coded and categorized by two researchers independently. Content analysis identified common themes. RESULTS: Two main discomfort themes were identified: unpleasant physical sensations and unpleasant psychologic feelings, with further subcategories. Physiologic and non-physiologic signs such as facial expression and motor activity helped to diagnose discomfort. Trial and error and cause and effect were used to differentiate pain from other sources of discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners saw pain as a dominant source of discomfort. Treating overall discomfort should focus on improving the quality of the total intensive care unit experience. Strategies to diagnose non-pain discomfort and pain were similar. Differentiating pain from non-pain discomfort is essential in order to provide appropriate treatment for pain and non-pain-related discomfort.

Nurses' perceptions of social rejection, resilience and well-being during COVID-19: A national comparative study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the level of social rejection and well-being of nurses, whether resilience is a mediator between them and to compare nurses who worked versus did not work on COVID-19 wards. BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic health care workers reported psychological distress and social rejection. METHODS: An online survey was sent to nursing social media groups in Israel. Respondents completed a Demographic, Social Rejection, Resilience and General Well-being questionnaire. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-seven nurses responded. The majority were female with a mean age of 43.6 years Approximately one-third were worried about infecting their family members and many agreed that their family fears that the nurse will infect them. Nurses reported their partner, family members, neighbours and the public physically distanced themselves from them. Approximately one quarter reported feeling lonely. Statistically significant differences were found between those who worked versus not work on a COVID-19 unit on general well-being, and social rejection. No differences were found in resilience scores. CONCLUSIONS: Social rejection was felt by many nurses as shown by an inverse relationship between the closeness of the relationship and the sense of social rejection and a high level of loneliness and depression. A higher level of social rejection and lower well-being were found among nurses working on COVID-19 wards as opposed to those who did not. General well-being was found to be exceptionally low during COVID-19. Resilience did not mediate the relationship between social rejection and general well-being. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Perceived social rejection might be associated with decreased well-being. The level of resilience is related to the level of well-being among nurses in general. Nurses not working in COVID-19 wards have higher levels of well-being and less social rejection compared with nurses working in these wards.

The Differentiation Between Pain and Discomfort: A Concept Analysis of Discomfort.

BACKGROUND: Discomfort is a concept found in the literature, usually related to pain. Some sources do not distinguish between pain and discomfort. Others refer to different sources of discomfort, thereby leading to a lack of conceptual clarity. AIMS: The objective of this paper was to present a concept analysis of discomfort. Full-text articles published between 1970 and 2016 in English were used to inform the concept analysis. DESIGN: Articles were taken from CINAHL, Medline and PsycNET databases. METHODS: A total of 7,406 articles and 120 abstracts were identified for evaluation. After initial review, 42 articles were further analyzed. Two reviewers independently evaluated the selected publications using the Walker and Avant approach to concept analysis. RESULTS: Discomfort can be physical or psychological and is characterized by an unpleasant feeling resulting in a natural response of avoidance or reduction of the source of the discomfort. Pain is one of the causes for discomfort, but not every discomfort can be attributed to pain. It is identified by self-report or observation. Discomfort in noncommunicative patients is assessed and measured via behavioral expression, also used to describe pain and agitation, leading to discomfort being interpreted as pain in some conditions. CONCLUSIONS: A clarification of the concept of discomfort leads to a more accurate theoretical and operational definition. This clarification can help nurses to make more accurate nursing diagnoses and develop methods to measure discomfort in order to provide optimal quality of nursing care.

Measuring pain or discomfort during routine nursing care in lightly sedated mechanically ventilated intensive care patients: A prospective preliminary cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pain is routinely measured on mechanically ventilated ICU patients. However, the tools used are not designed to discriminate between pain and non-pain discomfort, a distinction with therapeutic implications. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether clinical measurement tools can discern both pain and non-pain discomfort. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in a General ICU at a tertiary Medical Center in Israel. The Behavior Pain Scale (BPS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of Discomfort were simultaneously assessed by a researcher and bedside nurse on thirteen lightly sedated patients during 71 routine nursing interventions in lightly sedated, mechanically ventilated, adult patients. Patients were asked whether they were in pain due to these interventions. RESULTS: Statistically significant increases from baseline during interventions were observed [median change: 1.00 (-1-5), 1.5(-4-8.5), p < 0.001] as measured by BPS and VAS Discomfort Scale, respectively. BPS scores ranged between 4 and 6 when the majority (53 %) of the patients replied that they had no pain but were interpreted by the clinicians as discomfort. Endotracheal suctioning caused the greatest increase in BPS and VAS, with no statistically significant differences in BPS and VAS Discomfort Scale scores whether patients reported or did not report pain. A BPS>6 had a higher sensitivity and specificity to reported pain (accuracy of 76 %) compared to a BPS of 4-6. CONCLUSIONS: Standard assessments are sensitive to pain caused by routine nursing care interventions. However, this study presents evidence that among lightly sedated ICU patients, moderate BPS scores could also measure non-pain discomfort. ICU nurses should be aware that signs of unpleasantness measured by a pain scale could reflect non-pain discomfort.

Perception of discomfort by mechanical ventilation patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Routine care in intensive care units (ICU) results in patient pain and discomfort. While pain is treated with analgesics, discomfort is generally not well characterised or addressed. Since many ICU patients communicate only non-verbally, practitioners often cannot discern between pain or discomfort when treating such patients, potentially leading to inappropriate analgesic administration. A first step in discriminating between pain and discomfort is understanding how patients perceive their discomfort. OBJECTIVE: To describe mechanically ventilated ICU patients' perceptions of discomfort and how they differentiate discomfort from pain. METHOD: A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews conducted with 13 patients in a Medical and General ICU who survived mechanical ventilation. Transcripts were analysed using content analysis. FINDINGS: Two main discomfort themes were identified: unpleasant physical sensations and unpleasant psychological feelings. Each theme was further divided into subcategories. Most patients did not describe high levels of pain and did not associate physical discomfort with pain. CONCLUSIONS: Discomfort, as described by patients, stems from both physical sensations and psychological feelings. Pain was less often described as a negative ICU experience, while other non-pain sources of discomfort were more likely to be recalled. Therefore, practitioners should not only focus on treating pain but also on treating overall comfort to improve the quality of the ICU experience and potentially decrease post-ICU psychological sequela.

Assessment of the reliability and validity of the Comfort Scale for adult intensive care patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the use of the Comfort Scale (CS), originally developed for children, in sedated adults at intensive care units. METHODS: Comfort and sedation were assessed in a convenience sample of 88 adult intensive-care patients receiving mechanical ventilation, using 5 instruments (the Ramsay Scale, Sedation Agitation Scale, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, and CS). RESULTS: Reliability (internal consistency according to Cronbach's α, .60 to .66; inter-rater reliability, r = .81; test-retest, r = .21 to .31) and validity (criterion validity with other scales, κ = .49 to .74, for construct validity and sensitivity) were determined. The range of children's comfort (i.e., 17 to 26) was different from that in adults (i.e., 16 to 20). CONCLUSIONS: Results partially support the use of the CS among adults in intensive care units, with some minor adjustments.