Assessment of Prior Well Child Checks in Children With Concerns for Testicular Position: Opportunities for Early Referral From an Integrated Health System.

OBJECTIVE: To assess, through an integrated primary and specialty care pediatric health system, the association of well-child checks prior to referral with final urological diagnosis with the aim to identify opportunities for earlier referral of care. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of children referred from primary care to urology for undescended testis (UDT) within our integrated primary-specialty care health system in 2019, comparing children who had undescended testicles to those with either normal or retractile testicles based on the final urology examination. Demographics, including age, comorbidities, and the status of prior well-child check (WCC) within primary care, were reviewed. Outcomes of age at referral and surgical intervention for UDT were compared across referral categories. RESULTS: Stratifying by final diagnosis of 88 children included in the analysis, children with UDT were referred much later (85months, interquartile ranges 31-113) than children without UDT on final diagnosis (33months, interquartile ranges 15-74, P = .002). Furthermore, children with UDTs had a greater proportion with prior abnormal WCCs (N = 21/41, 51%) than those without UDT (N = 8/47, 17%) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Children with prior abnormal WCCs were more likely to have a final diagnosis of UDT, with prior abnormalities being documented approximately 12months prior to referral, indicating opportunities for improved referral patterns to urology.

How Effective Was the 2014 AUA Cryptorchidism Guideline? A Multi-institutional Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: In 2014, the AUA published guidelines regarding the evaluation of cryptorchidism. This multi-institutional study aims to determine if these guidelines reduced the age of referral and the utilization of ultrasound in boys with cryptorchidism. We hypothesize that delayed referral continues, and utilization of ultrasound remains unchanged. METHODS: A retrospective review of boys referred for the evaluation of cryptorchidism was performed at 4 academic institutions, collecting data for 1 year prior (2013) and 2 nonconsecutive years following guideline creation (2015 and 2019). Across these time frames, we compared median ages at evaluation and surgery, and rates of patient comorbidities, orchiopexy, and preevaluation ultrasound. RESULTS: A total of 3,293 patients were included. The median age at initial pediatric urology evaluation in all cohorts was 39 months (IQR: 14-92 months). Following publication of the AUA Guidelines, there was no difference (P = .08) in the median age at first evaluation by a pediatric urologist between 2013 and 2015, and an increase (P = .03) between 2013 and 2019. Overall, 21.2% of patients received an ultrasound evaluation prior to referral, with no significant difference between 2013 and 2015 (P = .9) or 2019 (P = .5) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that, despite publication of the AUA Guidelines on evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism, there has been no reduction in the age of urological evaluation or the utilization of imaging in boys with undescended testis. Finding alternative avenues to disseminate these evidence-based recommendations to referring providers and exploring barriers to guideline adherence is necessary to improve care for patients with cryptorchidism.