Virtual walking therapy in neuropathic spinal cord injury pain: a feasibility study.

STUDY DESIGN: A feasibility study. OBJECTIVES: Chronic neuropathic pain is a prevalent comorbidity in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), and current medical treatments remain unsatisfactory. New developments as virtual walking are emerging which has been established and further developed at our centre. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of our virtual walking setup in a small group of SCI patients. SETTING: The study was conducted at the Swiss Paraplegic Centre in Nottwil, Switzerland. METHODS: Four patients aged 22 to 60 years were observed during and after therapy. Three had complete paraplegia (levels Th4-Th8) with neuropathic at- and below-level pain, while one had incomplete paraplegia (Th10) with at-level pain. The primary outcome measured was satisfaction with acceptance of and adherence to virtual walking therapy, alongside suggestions for therapy improvements. Additionally, patients kept a pain diary and pain drawings to measure the extent of pain distribution and intensity before and after therapy. Therapy schedules included either two sessions per week for five weeks or five sessions per week for two weeks. RESULTS: There was a sound satisfaction and good acceptance amongst participants. Support, duration, and number of sessions were perceived well and acceptable. Pain as a secondary outcome did not change during or after therapy in all but one patient which improved in pain intensity, pain quality as well as pain distribution. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that our virtual walking setting is a feasible tool that should be further studied in patients with SCI-related chronic neuropathic pain.

Concurrent validity of a low-cost and time-efficient clinical sensory test battery to evaluate somatosensory dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: This study describes a low-cost and time-efficient clinical sensory test (CST) battery and evaluates its concurrent validity as a screening tool to detect somatosensory dysfunction as determined using quantitative sensory testing (QST). METHOD: Three patient cohorts with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS, n = 76), non-specific neck and arm pain (NSNAP, n = 40) and lumbar radicular pain/radiculopathy (LR, n = 26) were included. The CST consisted of 13 tests, each corresponding to a QST parameter and evaluating a broad spectrum of sensory functions using thermal (coins, ice cube, hot test tube) and mechanical (cotton wool, von Frey hairs, tuning fork, toothpicks, thumb and eraser pressure) detection and pain thresholds testing both loss and gain of function. Agreement rate, statistical significance and strength of correlation (phi coefficient) between CST and QST parameters were calculated. RESULTS: Several CST parameters (cold, warm and mechanical detection thresholds as well as cold and pressure pain thresholds) were significantly correlated with QST, with a majority demonstrating >60% agreement rates and moderate to relatively strong correlations. However, agreement varied among cohorts. Gain of function parameters showed stronger agreement in the CTS and LR cohorts, whereas loss of function parameters had better agreement in the NSNAP cohort. Other CST parameters (16 mN von Frey tests, vibration detection, heat and mechanical pain thresholds, wind-up ratio) did not significantly correlate with QST. CONCLUSION: Some of the tests in the CST could help detect somatosensory dysfunction as determined with QST. Parts of the CST could therefore be used as a low-cost screening tool in a clinical setting. SIGNIFICANCE: Quantitative sensory testing, albeit considered the gold standard to evaluate somatosensory dysfunction, requires expensive equipment, specialized examiner training and substantial time commitment which challenges its use in a clinical setting. Our study describes a CST as a low-cost and time-efficient alternative. Some of the CST tools (cold, warm, mechanical detection thresholds; pressure pain thresholds) significantly correlated with the respective QST parameters, suggesting that they may be useful in a clinical setting to detect sensory dysfunction.