Topical Review: An Update of Diagnostic and Management Algorithms for Acquired Blepharoptosis.

SIGNIFICANCE: Acquired ptosis is a condition of the upper eyelid that has negative cosmetic and functional effects but is likely underdiagnosed and undertreated. Given the evolving understanding of the condition and expanding therapeutic options, this review reappraised published evidence and clinical experience regarding diagnosis and treatment of acquired ptosis.The authors met over two structured virtual working sessions to review current evidence and develop timely recommendations for acquired ptosis identification, differential diagnosis, characterization, and treatment selection. Diagnostic algorithms, plus management and referral guidelines, are presented. Eyelid evaluation and, when needed, ptosis diagnostic workup are essential in the comprehensive eye examination. Acquired ptosis can be efficiently identified via patient questionnaire, history, and photograph review combined with assessment of eyelid position and symmetry using established methods. When ptosis is present, it is essential to evaluate onset, symptoms, pupil diameter, and extraocular muscle function to identify or rule out serious underlying conditions. If signs of serious underlying etiology are present, immediate referral/follow-up testing is required. After ruling out serious underlying causes, masquerade conditions, and pseudoptosis, pharmacologic or surgical treatment should be selected based on the clinical evidence. Effectively managing acquired ptosis requires practice-wide commitment to thorough eyelid evaluation, accurate diagnosis, and adoption of new treatment modalities. Aided by evolving pharmacologic therapeutic options, shifting from a "detect and refer" to a "diagnose and manage" approach can support identification and treatment of more patients with acquired ptosis, particularly mild-to-moderate cases.

Efficacy and Safety of OTX-101, a Novel Nanomicellar Formulation of Cyclosporine A, for the Treatment of Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca: Pooled Analysis of a Phase 2b/3 and Phase 3 Study.

BACKGROUND: OTX-101 (CEQUA™) is approved in the United States for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). This pooled analysis of 2 studies (phase 2b/3 and phase 3) evaluates the efficacy and safety of OTX-101 0.09% in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the subgroup of patients with a baseline Schirmer score less than 10 mm. METHODS: In these randomized, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled studies, patients received 1 drop of either OTX-101 or vehicle in both eyes twice daily. A Schirmer's test was performed at baseline and day 84/early discontinuation. Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) scores and adverse events were monitored at each visit. RESULTS: The pooled analysis included 523 and 525 patients randomized to OTX-101 0.09% and vehicle, respectively. In the ITT population, 16.6% of eyes receiving OTX-101 and 9.0% of eyes receiving vehicle showed a day 84 increase in Schirmer score ≥10 mm from baseline (P<0.0001). In the subgroup with Schirmer score less than 10 mm at baseline, 18.7% and 10.2% of eyes receiving OTX-101 and vehicle, respectively, exhibited this outcome (P=0.0001). The mean (SD) percent change from baseline in global SANDE scores on day 84 in the ITT population was -29.0% (39.0%) and -30.4% (39.5%) for OTX-101 and vehicle groups, respectively. In the subgroup, the mean (SD) percent change was -27.3% (39.7%) and -31.4% (38.3%) for OTX-101 and vehicle groups, respectively. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: OTX-101 improved tear production compared with vehicle. Both OTX-101 and vehicle showed improved SANDE scores over baseline. OTX-101 was well tolerated in patients with KCS.

24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Control with Fixed-dose Combination Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2%: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of fixed-combination brinzolamide 1%/brimonidine 0.2% (BBFC) over a 24-hour period. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group clinical trial conducted at 16 academic and nonacademic sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) aged ≥18 years with mean baseline IOP measurements in at least 1 eye of ≥21 and <28 mmHg. METHODS: Duplicate mean pneumatonometer IOP measurements were collected every 2 hours over a 24-hour period in controlled light conditions in overnight facilities. Daytime (8 am-8 pm) and nocturnal (10 pm-6 am) IOP measurements were collected in a sitting or supine position, respectively. Baseline 24-hour IOP was measured in untreated subjects after a washout (up to 4 weeks) and eligibility phase. After the baseline visit, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive masked BBFC or vehicle, 1 drop 3 times daily (8 am, 3 pm, and 10 pm) for 4 weeks. At week 4, IOP measurements were repeated in both groups under the same conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean change from baseline in 24-hour IOP at week 4. RESULTS: Of 125 participants randomized, 123 (98%; BBFC, n = 62; vehicle, n = 61) completed the study. No subjects randomized to BBFC discontinued the study. At week 4, BBFC-treated eyes had significantly reduced mean 24-hour IOP vs. vehicle (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]: -2.5 [-3.3, -1.7]; P < 0.001); daytime (-3.4 [-4.3, -2.6]; P < 0.001) and nocturnal (-1.2 [-2.3, 0.0]; P = 0.053) reductions were observed. Mean change from baseline was significantly different between BBFC- and vehicle-treated eyes at all daytime points and 3 of 5 nocturnal time points (10 pm, 12 am, and 6 am; secondary end point). The frequency of adverse events was similar between treatment groups; in the BBFC arm, ocular hyperemia, corneal abrasion, and dysgeusia were the most frequently reported, consistent with events described in the drug label. CONCLUSIONS: This large, multicenter study of 24-hour IOP control with BBFC met its primary end point; BBFC demonstrated significantly superior 24-hour IOP-lowering efficacy versus vehicle after 4 weeks of 3-times-daily treatment in subjects with OAG or OHT.

Repeatability of selective laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the results of repeat selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). INCLUSION CRITERIA: participants with primary or secondary open-angle glaucoma (excluding uveitic) who had undergone SLT 360° (SLT 1) with diminution of response over time followed by repeat SLT 360° (SLT 2). Six months of follow-up were required and at least 6 months in between SLT 1 and 2. The main outcome measures were IOP reduction at 6 and 12 months and a comparison of the response between SLT 1 and 2. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. If only one eye had repeat treatment, that eye was chosen; if both eyes qualified, one was chosen at random. The baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) for SLT 1 = 20.3+/- 5.2 mmHg and SLT 2 = 19.4 +/- 5.0 was reduced to 16.4 +/- 3.9 and 16.7 +/- 4.7 at 1 year, respectively (p < .001). Medication use was not significantly changed, and was 2.2 +/- 1.2 at baseline for SLT 1 and 2.1 +/- 1.3 for SLT 2, and at 1 year was 1.9 +/- 1.3 and 2.2 +/- 1.2, respectively. A subanalysis of 62 patients matched for equivalent baselines showed a baseline IOP = 18.7 +/- 3.8 for SLT 1 and 18.7 +/- 3.5 for SLT 2, reduced to 16.0 +/- 4.3 and 15.3 +/- 3.8 at 1 year (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Repeat SLT laser (360-degree treatment, followed by a loss of effect over time, then a second 360-degree treatment) in this population resulted in IOP lowering similar to that of the initial treatment.

Double-masked, randomized, dose-response study of AR-13324 versus latanoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.

OBJECTIVE: AR-13324 is a small-molecule inhibitor of Rho kinase and a norepinephrine transporter. The objective of this 28-day study was to evaluate the ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of AR-13324 ophthalmic solution compared with a positive control, latanoprost ophthalmic solution, in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN: Double-masked, randomized study in 22 private practice ophthalmology clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were required to be adults with a diagnosis of OAG or OHT with unmedicated intraocular pressure (IOP) in the range of 22 to 36 mmHg. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive AR-13324 ophthalmic solution 0.01%, daily (pm), AR-13324 ophthalmic solution 0.02% daily (pm), or latanoprost 0.005% daily (pm) for 28 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean diurnal IOP across subjects within the treatment group at day 28. RESULTS: Randomized and treated were 224 patients, 213 (95.1%) of whom completed the study. On day 28, mean diurnal IOP was 20.1, 20.0, and 18.7 mmHg in the AR-13324 0.01%, 0.02%, and latanoprost groups, respectively, representing a decrease from unmedicated baseline of 5.5, 5.7, and 6.8 mmHg (P<0.001). The 5.7-mmHg reduction in IOP by AR-13324 0.02% did not meet the criterion for noninferiority to latanoprost. The most frequently reported adverse event was conjunctival/ocular hyperemia, with a combined incidence of 52%, 57%, and 16%, respectively. On day 28 at 08:00 hours, the incidence of mild to moderate hyperemia by biomicroscopy was 18%, 24%, and 11%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AR-13324 0.02% was less effective than latanoprost by approximately 1 mmHg in patients with unmedicated IOPs of 22 to 35 mmHg. The major safety finding was ocular hyperemia, which was more common for both concentrations of AR-13324 than for latanoprost.

Validation of a Wearable Virtual Reality Perimeter for Glaucoma Staging, The NOVA Trial: Novel Virtual Reality Field Assessment.

Purpose: Compare estimated sensitivities of SITA-Standard to the RATA-Standard algorithm of the Radius virtual reality perimeter (VRP), and measure concordance in glaucoma staging. Methods: One hundred adult glaucoma patients-half with suspect or mild glaucoma, and half with moderate or severe-from five clinics performed four 24-2 visual field tests during a single visit, two with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and two with Radius, in randomized order: HRHR or RHRH. Only one eye was tested per participant. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni correction to compare distributions of estimated sensitivities across all 54 test locations over the 15 to 40 dB measurement range of the Radius. Weighted kappa measured concordance in glaucoma staging between two masked glaucoma experts using Medicare definitions of severity. Results: A total of 62 OD and 38 OS eyes were tested. Estimated sensitivities for SITA-Standard and RATA-Standard were not significantly different for OD, but were for OS-likely because of SITA-Standard OD and OS being significantly different in our sample, but not for RATA-Standard. Low agreement was observed between 15 to 22 dB. Concordance in glaucoma staging was high for both graders: kappa = 0.91 and kappa = 0.93. Average test duration was 298 seconds for RATA-Standard and 341 seconds for SITA-Standard. The correlation in mean deviation was 0.94. Conclusions: Estimated sensitivities of RATA-Standard are comparable to SITA-Standard between 23 to 40 dB with high concordance in glaucoma staging. Translational Relevance: Radius VRP is statistically noninferior to HFA when staging glaucoma using Medicare definitions.

Omidenepag Isopropyl Versus Timolol in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: Two Randomized Phase 3 Trials (SPECTRUM 4 and 3).

PURPOSE: The SPECTRUM 4 and 3 studies assessed the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) 0.002% vs timolol 0.5% in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN: Phase 3, randomized, controlled, double-masked, noninferiority studies. METHODS: Multicenter studies in the US. Inclusion criteria for adults ≥ 18 years (SPECTRUM 4 [N = 409] and 3 [N = 413]) were open-angle glaucoma or OHT, and IOP ≥ 22 mm Hg and ≤ 34 mm Hg; and for pediatric patients < 18 years (N = 13, SPECTRUM 3) were pediatric glaucoma or OHT. The primary objective in both studies was OMDI noninferiority to timolol in reducing IOP (3 months). SPECTRUM 3 included an additional 9 months of OMDI treatment. Safety evaluations were of ocular/non-ocular adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The IOP-lowering range of OMDI remained consistent in SPECTRUM 4 and 3 (-5.6 to -5.9 vs -5.3 to -5.7 mm Hg, respectively); however, timolol efficacy varied (-5.4 to -6.1 vs -6.4 to -7.0 mm Hg, respectively). OMDI noninferiority was achieved in SPECTRUM 4. Efficacy was maintained with 12-month treatment in SPECTRUM 3. Both studies reported more ocular AEs with OMDI, but lower rates of appearance-altering AEs vs timolol. No new safety concerns were identified. Rates of macular edema in pseudophakic patients increased with prolonged OMDI exposure. CONCLUSIONS: SPECTRUM 4 and 3 demonstrated consistent 3-month IOP-lowering efficacy and safety of OMDI vs timolol in patients with glaucoma or OHT. The 12-month data from SPECTRUM 3 suggest OMDI may have long-term benefits in patients with glaucoma or OHT.

Preservative-Free versus Benzalkonium Chloride-Preserved Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Phase 3 US Clinical Trial.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a preservative-free latanoprost 0.005% formulation (T2345) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) compared to benzalkonium chloride-preserved latanoprost 0.005% (BPL) formulation in the United States (US). Patients and Methods: A prospective, randomized, multicenter, observer-masked, parallel-group study enrolled 335 patients diagnosed with POAG or OHT from 31 US sites who had adequately controlled intraocular pressure (IOP; ≤18 mm Hg) with latanoprost monotherapy. After a ≥72-hour washout period, patients were randomized to T2345 (n=165) or BPL (n=170) groups. Study drugs were dosed once-daily from Day 0 to Day 84 in one or both eyes. The study eye was the eye with lower IOP at baseline. The primary efficacy measure was the between-group comparison of the mean IOP values in the study eye at each time point (8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM on Days 15, 42, and 84). Safety measurements included ocular and systemic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Both T2345 and BPL adequately controlled IOP with 95% CIs within 1.5 mm Hg in the study eye at all assessed time points. The percentages of patients with diurnal IOP <18 mm Hg at Day 84 were 73.1% vs 78.7% for the T2345 and BPL groups, respectively. Adverse events were generally mild-to-moderate and primarily ocular. Fewer patients in the T2345 group experienced ocular TEAEs (13.9% vs 22.5%, respectively) and TEAEs with a suspected relationship to the study medication compared with the BPL group (5.5% vs 11.8%, respectively). The most common ocular TEAEs were instillation site pain and conjunctival hyperemia. Conclusion: In patients with POAG or OHT, both T2345 and BPL maintained IOP at or below clinically meaningful values for the duration of the study. T2345 showed a favorable safety profile, with numerically lower incidences of ocular TEAEs than BPL.

Bimatoprost Implant Biodegradation in the Phase 3, Randomized, 20-Month ARTEMIS Studies.

Purpose: To evaluate the time course of biodegradation of an intracameral, biodegradable, sustained-release bimatoprost implant that lowers intraocular pressure without the need for daily eye drops. Methods: In 2 identically designed, randomized, phase 3 clinical trials, adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and open iridocorneal angles inferiorly in the study eye were administered 10- or 15-µg bimatoprost implant (day 1 and weeks 16 and 32) or twice-daily topical timolol 0.5%. Implants were assessed on gonioscopy throughout the studies. Investigators reported whether implants were visible, estimated the size of visible implants relative to their initial size at implantation, and reported the implant location. Data for 10-µg implant placed on day 1 were pooled from both studies for analysis. Results: A total of 372 patients received the 10-µg bimatoprost implant. The degree of implant biodegradation at each follow-up time point was variable among patients. The implant frequently swelled during the initial phase of biodegradation from 6 to 28 weeks. Accelerated biodegradation occurred between 31 and 52 weeks, resulting in 82% of implants absent or ≤25% of initial size by 52 weeks. By month 20, 95% of implants had biodegraded to absent or ≤25% of initial size. The implant was predominantly located inferiorly in the iridocorneal angle. Conclusions: Bimatoprost implant biodegradation in phase 3 studies showed some degree of variability among patients. Clinically significant implant biodegradation was observed in the majority of patients by 12 months. Clinical studies are in progress to further understand implant biodegradation and the ideal timing for implant re-administration. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02247804; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02250651.

Negative Pressure Application via a Multi-Pressure Dial to Lower IOP in Patients with Suspected Glaucoma or Open Angle Glaucoma.

PRCIS: The multi-pressure dial applies localized periocular negative pressure to safely and effectively lower IOP and represents the first non-invasive, non-pharmacologic device for IOP reduction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Multi-Pressure Dial (MPD) system, a device that applies periocular negative pressure to lower intraocular pressure (IOP). SETTING: 6 investigational sites, United States. DESIGN: Prospective, assessor-masked, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Subjects with suspected glaucoma, ocular hypertension (OHTN), and open angle glaucoma (OAG) with baseline IOP ≥13 mmHg and ≤32 mmHg were enrolled. One eye of each subject was randomized to receive negative pressure application; the fellow eye served as a control. The study eye negative pressure setting was programmed for 60% of the baseline IOP. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the proportion of study eyes versus control eyes achieving an IOP reduction ≥20% at Day 90. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of eyes achieving an IOP reduction ≥25% at Day 90 as well as the proportion of eyes achieving an IOP reduction ≥20% at Days 30 and 60. RESULTS: 116 eyes of 58 subjects completed the study. At the Day 90 visit, 89.7% ( n =52) of study eyes versus 3.4% ( n =2) of control eyes achieved an IOP reduction ≥20% ( P <0.001). At Day 90, 77.6% ( n =45) of study eyes achieved a ≥25% IOP reduction compared to 1.7% ( n =1) of control eyes ( P <0.001). The most commonly reported adverse events were lid (17.2% study eye, 7.8% control eye) and periorbital edema (14.1% study eye, 10.9% control eye). CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrates that the MPD safely and effectively lowers IOP in a group of patients that included glaucoma suspects, OHTN, and patients with OAG.

First Real-World, Multicenter, Post-Marketing, Retrospective Study of Dexamethasone Intraocular Suspension for Inflammation After Cataract Surgery.

Purpose: To evaluate dexamethasone intraocular suspension 9% (intraocular DXM) in real-world clinical use to manage inflammation associated with cataract surgery. Setting: Patients who underwent cataract surgery and received intraocular DXM at 22 outpatient eye surgery centers in the US. Design: Retrospective, observational chart review. Methods: Records of all patients who received intraocular DXM from March to December 2019 at participating centers were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures: Outcomes included anterior chamber cell (ACC) grades, anterior chamber flare (ACF) grades, and visual acuity, as well as intraocular pressure (IOP) and adverse events (AEs) at postoperative days (PODs) 1, 8, 14, 30. Descriptive statistics were generated. Results: The study population included 527 patients (641 eyes), with glaucoma history in 66 patients (80 eyes). Among eyes with recorded ACC grades, the percentage with grade 0 increased from 40% at POD 1 to 89.7% at POD 30, with similar results in eyes with glaucoma history. Among eyes with recorded ACF grades, the percentage with grade 0 increased from 78.4% at POD 1 to 97.1% at POD 30. At POD 30, 96.6% eyes with recorded results achieved target acuity. Mean IOP was 18.6 mmHg at POD 1 but declined to ≤15.2 mmHg thereafter. Investigators reported 22 AEs in 20 patients, all reported mild or moderate, the most common: IOP increase (7 events). Conclusion: Patients undergoing cataract surgery and treated with intraocular DXM showed favorable inflammatory and visual outcomes, without unanticipated safety problems, consistent with results of previous controlled clinical trials.

Effect of OTX-101 in Patients with Dry Eye Disease at Day 14 of Treatment: Ocular Surface Endpoint Results from the Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial.

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis, which initiates a cycle of ocular surface inflammation and damage. As ocular discomfort symptoms associated with DED can decrease quality of life, affected patients prefer treatments that rapidly improve the underlying disease process. OTX-101 0.09% (CEQUA®) is indicated to increase tear production in patients with DED. The current analysis assessed early efficacy of OTX-101 0.09% in adult patients with bilateral DED by evaluating ocular surface endpoints after 14 days of treatment in the phase 2b/3 trial. In this randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, dose-ranging study, patients received one drop of OTX-101 0.05%, OTX-101 0.09%, or vehicle per eye twice daily for 84 days. Corneal staining, conjunctival staining, tear breakup time (TBUT), and modified Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) total global symptom score were assessed at baseline and Days 14, 28, 42, 56, and 84/early discontinuation. Overall, 455 patients were randomized (OTX-101 0.05%, n=151; OTX-101 0.09%, n=152; vehicle, n=152); only baseline and Day 14 results for the approved OTX-101 0.09% formulation and vehicle are presented. Least squares (LS) mean (standard error [SE]) change from baseline in conjunctival staining score was -1.3 (0.1) for OTX-101 and -1.0 (0.1) for vehicle. LS mean (SE) change from baseline in corneal staining score was -1.1 (0.17) for OTX-101 and -0.7 (0.17) for vehicle. LS mean (SE) change from baseline in TBUT was 0.52 (0.15) for OTX-101 and 0.36 (0.15) for vehicle. LS mean (SE) change from baseline in modified SANDE total global symptom score was -4.93 (1.54) for OTX-101 and -9.1 (1.54) for vehicle. OTX-101 0.09% demonstrated a numerically greater treatment effect compared with vehicle in conjunctival staining, corneal staining, and TBUT after 14 days.

A multicenter, retrospective chart review study comparing index therapy change rates in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension patients newly treated with latanoprost or travoprost-Z monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Because latanoprost and the original formulation of travoprost that included benzalkonium chloride (BAK) have been shown to be similar with regard to tolerability, we compared initial topical intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication change rates in patients newly treated with latanoprost or travoprost-Z monotherapy. METHODS: At 14 clinical practice sites, medical records were abstracted for patients with a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and who were ≥40 years of age, had a baseline and at least one follow-up visit, and had no prior history of ocular prostaglandin use. Data regarding demographics, ocular/systemic medical histories, clinical variables, therapy initiations and reasons for changes, adverse events, and resource utilization were recorded from randomly chosen eligible charts. Primary outcomes were rates of and reasons for changing from the initial therapy within six months and across the full study period (1000 days). RESULTS: Data from 900 medical charts (latanoprost, 632; travoprost-Z, 268) were included. For both cohorts, average follow-up was >1 year. Cohorts were similar with regard to age (median ~67 years), gender distribution (>50% female), and diagnosis (~80% with open-angle glaucoma). Within six months, rates of index therapy change for latanoprost versus travoprost-Z were 21.2% (134/632) and 28.7% (77/268), respectively (p = 0.0148); across the full study period, rates were 34.5% (218/632) and 45.2% (121/268), respectively (p = 0.0026). Among those who changed their index therapy, insufficient IOP control was the most commonly reported reason followed by adverse events; hyperemia was the most commonly reported adverse event at index therapy change. CONCLUSIONS: In this "real world" study of changes in therapy in patients prescribed initial monotherapy with latanoprost with BAK or travoprost-Z with SofZia, medication changes were common in both treatment groups but statistically significantly more frequent with travoprost-Z.

A review of acquired blepharoptosis: prevalence, diagnosis, and current treatment options.

Blepharoptosis (ptosis) is among the most common disorders of the upper eyelid encountered in both optometric and ophthalmic practice. The unilateral or bilateral drooping of the upper eyelid that characterises ptosis can affect appearance and impair visual function, both of which can negatively impact quality of life. While there are several known forms of congenital ptosis, acquired ptosis (appearing later in life, due to a variety of causes) is the predominant form of the condition. This review summarises the prevalence, causes, identification, differential diagnosis, and treatment of acquired ptosis. Particular attention is paid to the differential diagnosis of acquired ptosis and emerging treatment options, including surgical and pharmacologic approaches.

Impact of dexamethasone intraocular suspension 9% on intraocular pressure after routine cataract surgery: post hoc analysis.

PURPOSE: To characterize intraocular pressure (IOP) response after treatment with dexamethasone intraocular suspension 9% vs placebo (vehicle) injection or topical prednisolone acetate 1% and to identify factors associated with increased IOP after cataract surgery. SETTING: Data were pooled from two multicenter phase 3 clinical trials of patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind study and open-label study. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to treatment with dexamethasone intraocular suspension or placebo in the double-blind study 1 and to dexamethasone intraocular suspension or topical prednisolone acetate in the open-label study 2. Subjects who experienced 10 mm Hg or greater, 15 mm Hg or greater, or 20 mm Hg or greater postoperative IOP increase from baseline were stratified by baseline IOP. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models of patient variables were applied to identify independent risk factors predictive of IOP elevation of 10 mm Hg or greater or 15 mm Hg or greater. RESULTS: The study comprised 414 subjects. Dexamethasone intraocular suspension was associated with a slightly higher mean IOP at the first postoperative visit vs prednisolone (P < .05); however, mean IOP was not statistically different between the 2 groups by postoperative day 8 (P = .5006) or thereafter. Univariate analysis showed that both prednisolone and dexamethasone intraocular suspension increased risk for postoperative IOP elevation compared with placebo; however, there was no statistically significant increased risk with dexamethasone intraocular suspension vs prednisolone. Aside from antiinflammatory treatment, risk factors for postoperative IOP elevation by univariate and multivariate analyses were higher baseline IOP, high myopia, and, when defining IOP increase as 15 mm Hg or greater from baseline, male sex. CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone intraocular suspension was associated with IOP elevation patterns comparable with topical prednisolone. High myopia, higher baseline IOP, and male sex were significant predictors of postoperative IOP elevation in this cohort.

Safety of Once-Daily Oxymetazoline HCl Ophthalmic Solution, 0.1% in Patients with Acquired Blepharoptosis: Results from Four Randomized, Double-Masked Clinical Trials.

PURPOSE: An oxymetazoline 0.1% ophthalmic solution was recently approved for treatment of acquired blepharoptosis in adults. This study's objective was to evaluate the safety profile of oxymetazoline 0.1% when administered once daily for 14-84 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pooled analysis examined safety outcomes from four randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trials conducted at 6, 16, 27, and 35 sites, respectively, in the United States. In total, 568 participants with acquired blepharoptosis were evaluated. Median age was 66 years and 74.8% of participants were female. Overall, 375 participants self-administered oxymetazoline 0.1% to both eyes once/day and 193 self-administered placebo (vehicle) daily. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates, severity, and causality were evaluated in the overall population and within participant subgroups defined based on age, race, and ethnicity. Vital signs and ophthalmic findings were evaluated at predefined study visits. Patient-reported treatment tolerability was recorded at study end. RESULTS: TEAE incidence was similar among participants using oxymetazoline 0.1% (31.2%) or vehicle (30.6%). Nearly all TEAEs were mild-to-moderate, and most were not suspected of being treatment related. Serious TEAEs occurred in four participants receiving oxymetazoline 0.1% and one participant receiving vehicle. Nine and two participants in the oxymetazoline 0.1% and vehicle groups, respectively, discontinued due to a TEAE. Ocular TEAEs occurring in ≥2% of participants receiving oxymetazoline 0.1% were punctate keratitis, conjunctival hyperemia, dry eye, blurred vision, instillation site pain, and corneal vital dye staining, with none occurring in >3.5% of participants. TEAE rates were similar across subgroups based on age, race, and ethnicity. No clinically significant mean changes in vital signs or ophthalmologic findings occurred, and >98% of participants rated oxymetazoline 0.1% as causing no/mild discomfort. CONCLUSION: Once-daily oxymetazoline 0.1% was safe and well tolerated in participants with acquired blepharoptosis when used for 14-84 days. Safety did not appear to differ based on age, race, or ethnicity.

Rapid and Sustained Eyelid Elevation in Acquired Blepharoptosis with Oxymetazoline 0.1%: Randomized Phase 3 Trial Results.

PURPOSE: Oxymetazoline 0.1% is a novel ophthalmic agent for the treatment of acquired blepharoptosis in adults that has been shown to improve upper eyelid elevation and superior visual field deficits. This analysis characterized the rapid onset of upper eyelid elevation with once-daily oxymetazoline 0.1% and durability of this effect over 42 days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooling data from two prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies, change in marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD-1) was evaluated at a range of post-instillation time points on treatment days 1, 14, and 42. Onset of effect was assessed beginning at 5 minutes post-administration (one study) and through 6 hours at the first two visits (both studies). Overall, 203 subjects received oxymetazoline 0.1% and 101 received vehicle. RESULTS: Oxymetazoline 0.1% demonstrated a rapid onset of action on all days evaluated. Mean changes from baseline 5 and 15 minutes post-oxymetazoline 0.1% instillation on day 1 were 0.59 ± 0.72 mm and 0.93 ± 0.81 mm, respectively (vs 0.20 ± 0.57 mm and 0.32 ± 0.64 mm with vehicle; both p<0.001). On day 14, mean changes from baseline 5 and 15 minutes post-oxymetazoline 0.1% instillation were 0.77 ± 0.85 mm and 1.11 ± 0.92 mm, respectively (vs 0.42 ± 0.78 mm and 0.41 ± 0.83 mm with vehicle; both p<0.05). This effect was also observed immediately post-instillation on day 42, where mean increases 5 and 15 minutes post-oxymetazoline 0.1% instillation were 0.86 ± 0.85 mm and 1.04 ± 0.91 mm, respectively (vs 0.42 ± 0.80 mm and 0.47 ± 0.93 mm with vehicle; both p<0.005). Significant improvements vs vehicle (p<0.001) were also observed at 2-6 hours on days 1 and 14. At all time points, the proportion of subjects showing a positive response to treatment (>0% MRD-1 increase) was >15% greater in the oxymetazoline 0.1% group (range 16.6-36.1% more responders vs vehicle), with the largest differences observed 2 and 6 hours post-instillation. CONCLUSION: Oxymetazoline 0.1% provided rapid and sustained upper eyelid elevation. Together with data demonstrating superior visual field improvement and a favorable safety profile, this analysis supports oxymetazoline 0.1% as an effective non-surgical treatment for acquired ptosis.

Phase 3, Randomized, 20-Month Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost Implant in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (ARTEMIS 2).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of 10 and 15 µg bimatoprost implant in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). METHODS: This randomized, 20-month, multicenter, masked, parallel-group, phase 3 trial enrolled 528 patients with OAG or OHT and an open iridocorneal angle inferiorly in the study eye. Study eyes were administered 10 or 15 µg bimatoprost implant on day 1, week 16, and week 32, or twice-daily topical timolol maleate 0.5%. Primary endpoints were IOP and IOP change from baseline through week 12. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and corneal endothelial cell density (CECD). RESULTS: Both 10 and 15 µg bimatoprost implant met the primary endpoint of noninferiority to timolol in IOP lowering through 12 weeks. Mean IOP reductions from baseline ranged from 6.2-7.4, 6.5-7.8, and 6.1-6.7 mmHg through week 12 in the 10 µg implant, 15 µg implant, and timolol groups, respectively. IOP lowering was similar after the second and third implant administrations. Probabilities of requiring no IOP-lowering treatment for 1 year after the third administration were 77.5% (10 µg implant) and 79.0% (15 µg implant). The most common TEAE was conjunctival hyperemia, typically temporally associated with the administration procedure. Corneal TEAEs of interest (primarily corneal endothelial cell loss, corneal edema, and corneal touch) were more frequent with the 15 than the 10 µg implant and generally were reported after repeated administrations. Loss in mean CECD from baseline to month 20 was ~ 5% in 10 µg implant-treated eyes and ~ 1% in topical timolol-treated eyes. Visual field progression (change in the mean deviation from baseline) was reduced in the 10 µg implant group compared with the timolol group. CONCLUSIONS: The results corroborated the previous phase 3 study of the bimatoprost implant. The bimatoprost implant met the primary endpoint and effectively lowered IOP. The majority of patients required no additional treatment for 12 months after the third administration. The benefit-risk assessment favored the 10 over the 15 µg implant. Studies evaluating other administration regimens with reduced risk of corneal events are ongoing. The bimatoprost implant has the potential to improve adherence and reduce treatment burden in glaucoma. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02250651.

Managing Dry Eye Disease and Facilitating Realistic Patient Expectations: A Review and Appraisal of Current Therapies.

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterized by loss of homeostasis of the tear film and accompanied by ocular signs and symptoms such as corneal and conjunctival damage, patient discomfort, and visual disturbance. The prevalence of DED ranges from 5%-33%. Patients with DED may have a reduced quality of life due to their discomfort and visual disturbances. The multifactorial nature of DED requires a multi-targeted treatment approach to address the signs and symptoms. Treatment for DED should follow a step-wise approach beginning with education, dietary modification, and lid and lash hygiene, and progressing to pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. Ocular lubricants, a mainstay of DED therapy, provide temporary symptomatic relief for the patient, but do not address the underlying pathophysiology. Some currently available pharmacologic treatments that address the underlying pathophysiology of DED may have a delay of 3-6 months in the onset of therapeutic effect; however, these treatment options may also have tolerability issues. These challenges highlight the need for newer pharmacologic treatments with an earlier onset of observable clinical effect and the potential for improved tolerability profile. Patient education is vital to DED management and should convey the complex and chronic nature of DED. It is important for the eye care practitioner to set realistic expectations with the patient when managing DED to help improve treatment success. This helps the patient understand the need for ongoing treatment and that results will likely not be seen immediately. This review covers the current management of DED, focusing on pharmacologic management, and offers recommendations for the practitioner to help facilitate realistic patient expectations for the treatment of DED.

Fixed-Dose Combination of Netarsudil and Latanoprost in Ocular Hypertension and Open-Angle Glaucoma: Pooled Efficacy/Safety Analysis of Phase 3 MERCURY-1 and -2.

INTRODUCTION: New open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) therapies that reduce treatment burden and improve outcomes relative to currently available agents are needed. Netarsudil, a novel Rho kinase inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) by increasing trabecular outflow. Two phase 3 superiority studies compared a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of netarsudil and the prostaglandin latanoprost with each active component for IOP-lowering efficacy. METHODS: Pooled efficacy and safety data were analyzed from MERCURY-1 and -2 studies in patients with OAG or OHT. Patients instilled one drop of netarsudil (0.02%)/latanoprost (0.005%) FDC (n = 483), netarsudil (0.02%, n = 499), or latanoprost (0.005%, n = 486) into each eye once-daily between 20:00 and 22:00. IOP was measured at 08:00, 10:00, and 16:00 at weeks 2, 6, and the primary endpoint at month 3. RESULTS: Baseline mean diurnal IOP was 23.6, 23.6, and 23.5 mmHg in netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, netarsudil, and latanoprost groups, respectively. Mean diurnal IOP in each group was 15.3, 18.1, and 17.5 mmHg at week 2, 15.7, 18.4, and 17.4 mmHg at week 6, and 15.8, 18.4, and 17.3 mmHg at week 12. The netarsudil/latanoprost FDC met criteria for superiority compared with each active component (p < 0.0001 for all nine time points). At month 3, among patients randomized to netarsudil/latanoprost FDC or latanoprost, 58.4% vs 37.3% (p < 0.0001) achieved IOP ≤ 16 mmHg. Among patients randomized to netarsudil/latanoprost FDC or netarsudil or latanoprost, 30.9% vs 5.9% (p < 0.0001) vs 8.5% (p < 0.0001) achieved at least a 40% reduction from baseline in mean diurnal IOP. Pooled safety results were consistent with individual MERCURY studies. CONCLUSION: Once-daily netarsudil/latanoprost FDC produced statistically significant and clinically relevant reductions in mean IOP that were statistically superior to IOP reductions achieved by netarsudil and latanoprost monotherapy. Results of the pooled efficacy and safety analyses were consistent with the individual studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT02558400 and NCT02674854.

In patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT), treatment to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) is needed to prevent optic nerve damage and vision loss. Many patients do not achieve sufficient IOP lowering with a single drug. The use of multiple IOP-lowering agents, which may have different dose regimens, can be complex and reduce patient adherence. Combination treatments that incorporate multiple agents are available, but until recently none included a prostaglandin analogue, the most widely prescribed first-line therapy. A once-daily, fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy (ROCKLATAN^®) has been approved in the USA that contains the prostaglandin analogue latanoprost and netarsudil, a novel Rho kinase inhibitor. The netarsudil/latanoprost FDC demonstrated efficacy and safety in lowering IOP among patients with OAG and OHT in the 12-month MERCURY-1 and the 3-month MERCURY-2 clinical trials. To better characterize efficacy and safety, we pooled and analyzed the data from each trial. The pooled data support the findings of the individual studies:Efficacy: 1. Netarsudil/latanoprost FDC demonstrated statistical superiority to the individual components netarsudil and latanoprost in decreasing IOP at all time points assessed over 3 months. 2. Nearly twice as many patients receiving FDC achieved at least a 30% reduction from baseline in IOP, as recommended by the American Academy of Ophthalmology for a first-line treatment, compared to the IOP reduction achieved by netarsudil and latanoprost monotherapy.Safety: No new safety signals were identified. Netarsudil/latanoprost FDC was associated with no treatment-related serious adverse events, minimal systemic adverse events, and manageable ocular adverse events.