Effect of Chemotherapy on Gonadal Function and Sexual Function of Male Cancer Survivors: A Review Article.

INTRODUCTION: The advancement of anti-cancer treatment has increased survival rates among patients, yet putting them in an increased risk for developing side-effects. In addition to early side-effects, anti-cancer treatments, in particular chemotherapeutic medications can cause long-term side-effects; fertility and sexual dysfunction included. The aim of this study was to review existing data on the effects of different chemotherapeutic agents on fertility and sexual function of male cancer survivors who received chemotherapy at different stages of life. METHOD: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar to detect studies focused on the effect of chemotherapy on the gonadal/testicular function and sexual function of male cancer survivors. We restricted our search to English language publications and manuscript published before the year 2000 were excluded. RESULTS: It has been well understood that chemotherapy impairs gonadal function in major number of cancer survivors and gonadal dysfunction is not protected if chemotherapeutic agents administered before puberty in males. Moreover, effect of chemotherapy on sexual function is controversial. CONCLUSION: While several articles reported the worst effect of chemotherapy on sexual function of cancer survivors, some studied reported that chemotherapy do not impair sexual function. Higher levels of chemotherapy dose seem to be associated with more gonadal and sexual dysfunction.

Pericardial effusion in patients with chronic kidney disease: A two-center study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pericardial effusion (PE) is a prevalent form of pericardial involvement in chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aims to investigate the clinical and laboratory features associated with PE severity in patients with CKD. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we examined the medical records of patients admitted to tertiary hospitals with International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes associated with CKD and PE. We included 112 CKD patients in stage 4 and 5 non-dialysis (ND) with PE for assessing the clinical and laboratory features of severity. RESULTS: Patients were divided into two categories based on the severity of PE. Seventy-two patients had mild and 40 had moderate and severe PE. Univariate analysis of demographic and laboratory features on the date of admission demonstrated that chest pain, dyspnea, serum albumin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are associated with the severity of PE. The univariate analysis on the date of echocardiography showed significantly higher white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count (percentage and absolute count), and NLR, along with significantly lower lymphocyte percentage and serum albumin among patients with moderate and severe PE. In the multivariable analysis of laboratory features, on admission hypoalbuminemia (p-value = 0.014, OR = 4.03, CI: 1.32-12.25) and NLR greater than 5.5 (p-value = 0.015, OR = 4.22, CI: 1.32-13.50) were significantly associated with moderate and severe PE. In a parallel matter, at the time of echocardiography hypoalbuminemia (p-value = 0.004, OR = 5.38, CI: 1.74-16.65) and neutrophilia (p-value = 0.005, OR = 7.94, CI: 1.89-33.44) were significantly associated with moderate and severe PE. CONCLUSION: Despite advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of CKD, PE is still a concerning issue in these patients. This study revealed that hypoalbuminemia, neutrophilia, and NLR greater than 5.5 could be predictive factors of moderate and severe PE in CKD patients with PE. Further prospective study with larger sample size is needed to confirm these results.

The clinical outcomes of xenografts in the treatment of burn patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although autografts are not feasible in patients with extensive burn wounds, allografts and xenografts can be used for temporary coverage. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the outcomes of xenografts and the standard treatment of burn wounds. METHODS: International online databases were searched for English articles comparing xenografts with routine treatment in the burn patients. The random-effects model was used to estimate standardized mean differences (SMD) or odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: From a total of 7144 records, 14 studies were included in our review after screening by title and abstracts followed by full-texts. No significant difference in hospital stays was found between the mammalian xenografts and control groups (SMD [95% CI] = - 0.18 [- 0.54-0.18]). The mean number of dressing changes was significantly lower in both mammalian xenografts compared to the controls (SMD [95% CI] = - 1.01 [- 1.61-- 0.41]) and fish xenografts compared to controls (SMD [95% CI] = - 6.16 [- 7.65-- 4.66]). In the fish xenografts, re-epithelialization time was significantly lower compared to controls (SMD [95% CI] = - 1.18 [- 2.23-- 0.14]). CONCLUSIONS: Xenografts showed a significantly lower number of dressing changes and fish xenografts showed significant benefit in re-epithelialization compared to routine treatment. The beneficial results of xenografts suggest further research in the use of different types of xenografts in patients with extensive burn.

Human T2R38 Bitter Taste Receptor Expression and COVID-19: From Immunity to Prognosis.

Background: Bitter taste-sensing type 2 receptor (T2Rs or TAS2Rs) found on ciliated epithelial cells and solitary chemosensory cells have a role in respiratory tract immunity. T2Rs have shown protection against SARS-CoV-2 by enhancing the innate immune response. The purpose of this review is to outline the current sphere of knowledge regarding this association. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was done by searching (T2R38 OR bitter taste receptor) AND (COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2) keywords in PubMed and google scholar. Results: T2R38, an isoform of T2Rs encoded by the TAS2R38 gene, may have a potential association between phenotypic expression of T2R38 and prognosis of COVID-19. Current studies suggest that due to different genotypes and widespread distributions of T2Rs within the respiratory tract and their role in innate immunity, treatment protocols for COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases may change accordingly. Based on the phenotypic expression of T2R38, it varies in innate immunity and host response to respiratory infection, systemic symptoms and hospitalization. Conclusion: This review reveals that patients' innate immune response to SARS-COV-2 could be influenced by T2R38 receptor allelic variations.

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy worldwide and its associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has taken a toll on humans, and the development of effective vaccines has been a promising tool to end the pandemic. However, for a vaccination program to be successful, a considerable proportion of the community must be vaccinated. Hence, public acceptance of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines has become the key to controlling the pandemic. Recent studies have shown vaccine hesitancy increasing over time. This systematic review aims to evaluate the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rate and related factors in different communities. Method: A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science from January 1, 2019 to January 31, 2022. All relevant descriptive and observational studies (cross-sectional and longitudinal) on vaccine hesitancy and acceptance were included in this systematic review. In the meta-analysis, odds ratio (OR) was used to assess the effects of population characteristics on vaccine hesitancy, and event rate (acceptance rate) was the effect measure for overall acceptance. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot, Egger's test, and trim-and-fill methods. Result: A total of 135 out of 6,417 studies were included after screening. A meta-analysis of 114 studies, including 849,911 participants, showed an overall acceptance rate of 63.1%. In addition, men, married individuals, educated people, those with a history of flu vaccination, those with higher income levels, those with comorbidities, and people living in urban areas were less hesitant. Conclusion: Increasing public awareness of the importance of COVID-19 vaccines in overcoming the pandemic is crucial. Being men, living in an urban region, being married or educated, having a history of influenza vaccination, having a higher level of income status, and having a history of comorbidities are associated with higher COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.