Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Int Braz J Urol ; 48(6): 915-929, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35195386

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the prevalence and clinical risk factors in patients diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer (IPC) during certain surgeries (transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP], open prostatectomy [OP], and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate [HoLEP]) after clinically suspected benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature search of the MEDILINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify eligible studies published before June 2021. Multivariate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the prevalence and clinical risk factors of IPC were calculated using random or fixed-effect models. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. Amongst the 94.783 patients, IPC was detected in 24.715 (26.1%). Results showed that the chance of IPC detection (10%, 95% CI: 0.07-4.00; P<0.001; I2=97%) in patients treated with TURP is similar to that of patients treated with HoLEP (9%, 95% CI: 0.07-0.11; P<0.001; I2=81.4%). However, the pooled prevalence estimate of patients treated with OP was 11% (95% CI: -0.03-0.25; P=0.113; I2=99.1%) with no statistical significance. We observed increased incidence of IPC diagnosis after BPH surgery amongst patients with higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.23; P=0.004; I2=89%), whereas no effect of age (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.97-1.06; P=0.48; I2=78.8%) and prostate volume (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96-1.03; P=0.686; I2=80.5%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of IPC was similar amongst patients undergoing TURP, HoLEP, and OP for presumed BPH. Interestingly, increased PSA level was the only independent predictor of increasing risk of IPC after BPH surgery rather than age and prostate volume. Hence, future research should focus on predictors which accurately foretell the progression of prostate cancer to determine the optimal treatment for managing patients with IPC after BPH surgery.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Neoplasias da Próstata , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Prevalência , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/efeitos adversos , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
BMC Urol ; 21(1): 114, 2021 Aug 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34425813

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Germline BRCA2 mutation is associated with an aggressive prostate cancer phenotype and indicates higher risk for hereditary cancer. Recently, numerous studies have attempted to identify the genomic landscape of prostate cancer to better understand the genomic drivers of this disease and look for the molecular targets to guide treatment selection. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 67-year-old patient diagnosed with prostate cancer who experienced rapid disease progression after androgen deprivation therapy and subsequent docetaxel treatment. The patient had a strong family history of malignancy as his mother was diagnosed with breast cancer and his father was died of lung cancer. Next generation sequencing demonstrated a novel pathogenic germline BRCA2 mutation (p.Gly2181Glufs*10) in the patient. His mother with breast cancer and his son were found to have the same BRCA2 mutation. The patient experienced impressive and durable responses to carboplatin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrated that the carboplatin could have a dramatic antitumor effect on patients with prostate cancer with germline BRCA2 mutations and family history will help to ensure that patients and their families can be provided with proper genetic counseling.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Carboplatina/uso terapêutico , Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Povo Asiático , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Gradação de Tumores , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue ; 23(5): 452-454, 2017 May.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29717838

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical diagnosis and treatment of seminal vesicle cyst (SVC) associated with ipsilateral renal agenesis (Zinner syndrome) in order to promote the understanding of the disease. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about 1 case ofZinner syndrome diagnosed and treated in our hospital and reviewed the literature related to this disease in domestic and foreign authoritative databases. RESULTS: The patient was a 23-year-old male, diagnosed with Zinner syndrome, treated bytransrectal aspiration of SVC, and discharged from hospital 3 days postoperatively. Follow-upat 6 months after discharge found that the patient no longer felt perineal discomfort in the endstage of urination, but transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate revealedthe samevolume of fluid in the left seminal vesicles as before,which indicated recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: SVC associated with ipsilateral renal agenesis can be considered asZinner syndrome. Transrectal aspiration of SVCcan relieve the local symptoms of the patient but relapse may easilyoccur. Therefore it is not recommended as the first-choice treatment of the disease.


Assuntos
Cistos/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/diagnóstico por imagem , Glândulas Seminais/diagnóstico por imagem , Rim Único/complicações , Cistos/terapia , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Períneo , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome , Ultrassonografia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi ; 36(6): 749-52, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27491237

RESUMO

Authors raised that staging based strategies and practice of integrative medicine (IM) by combining syndrome typing and disease identification, and choosing suitable measures in accordance with different persons and seasonal conditions after more than ten years' clinical practice and researches. Radical operation as prior (as evil eliminating) and strengthening vital qi in perioerative period are best strategy for promoting rapid rehabilitation of early stage prostate cancer patients. Strengthening body resistance to eliminate evil was used in treating advanced prostate cancer patients. For example, a comprehensive treatment program for hormone-dependent patients was combined with endocrinotherapy and Chinese herbs for synergisic efficacy-enhancing actions. In this way, these patients' quality of life (QOL) were improved and time to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) was delayed, even some patients were clinically cured. There are lack of effective medicines and methods for CRPC patients. Greatly tonifying original qi is mainly used for improving their clinical symptoms and prolonging survivals. Practice has proved staging based strategies and practice of IM has favorable advantages in treating prostate cancer, especially showing prospect in prolonging survival and postponing progression of advanced prostate cancer patients. Besides, it also could provide beneficial considerations and inspiration for combination of syndrome typing and disease identification.


Assuntos
Medicina Tradicional Chinesa , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/diagnóstico , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida
5.
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue ; 20(6): 539-43, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25029862

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of Shenfu Injection (SF) on the apoptosis of prostate cancer PC-3 cells and its possible mechanism. METHODS: We divided prostate cancer PC-3 cells into a blank control group and three experimental groups, the latter treated with SF at 50, 100, and 200 microl/ml, respectively, for 24, 48, and 72 hours. Then we determined the proliferation of the cells by MTT assay, measured their apoptosis by Annexin V/PI flow cytometry, and detected the expression of P53 mRNA by RT-qPCR. RESULTS: Compared with the blank control group, the survival rates of the prostate cancer PC-3 cells in the 50, 100, and 200 microl/ml SF groups were (93.76 +/- 2.63)%, (81.21 +/- 1.80)% and (18.01 +/- 3.84)% at 24 hours, (94.67 +/-1.11)%, (78.33 +/- 2.89)% and (10.34 +/- 1.44)% at48 hours, and (91.30 +/- 0.47)%, (36.67 +/- 1.56)% and (1.33 +/- 0.32)% at 72 hours, all significantly increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner (P < 0.05). The expression of p53 mRNA was also markedly increased in all the three experimental groups at 48 hours (P < 0. 05). CONCLUSION: SF can inhibit the proliferation and induce the apoptosis of PC-3 cells, which may due to its upregulation of the p53 mRNA expression.


Assuntos
Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/farmacologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/metabolismo
6.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1280531, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38293696

RESUMO

Introduction: Distant metastases of vulvar SCC most commonly involve the lung, liver, bone, skin, and lymph nodes. Metastasis from vulvar SCC to the kidneys is extremely rare, with only one case reported in the literature to date. Case presentation: We report the case of a 53-year-old postmenopausal female patient was diagnosed with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in an external hospital and following the diagnosis, she had been performed a vulvectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, at that time, the patient had not undergone inguinal lymphadenectomy. In July 2019, she was admitted to our hospital due to upper right quadrant pain. An enhanced whole-body CT scan showed a mixed-density tumor of the right kidney with invasion into the right renal portal vein and multiple enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET - CT) scan showed a significantly increased radioactivity uptake in the tumor and enlarged lymph nodes, but PET-CT did not show abnormal enlargement of bilateral inguinal lymph nodes and no abnormal increase in radioactivity uptake. PET-CT examination did not show recurrence in terms of local of vulvar. These results led us to be gravely worried about possible renal carcinoma, so it was agreed upon to perform laparoscopic nephrectomy of the right kidney in the same month. Histology of the resected tumor confirmed it to be poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with invasion consistent with metastatic vulvar carcinoma. Based on clinical history, radiological and histological facts, the patient was diagnosed with kidney metastasis from vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Recovery from surgery went well and the patient was transferred to the oncology department and underwent a chemotherapy regimen consisting of paclitaxel and nedaplatin for further treatment. After 6 courses of chemotherapy. For a year after treatment, the patient had lived progression-free. Unfortunately, she died of tumor progression in July 2022. Conclusion: Although renal metastasis from vulvar SCC is rare, renal metastasis should be considered for the patient with a history of vulvar cancer, whenever a mass is identified in the kidney. Timely surgical removal of renal metastasis may prolong the survival time.

7.
Investig Clin Urol ; 63(2): 201-206, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35244994

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the prevalence and predictors of incidental prostate cancer (IPC) after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with negative results on transperineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy or TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 253 patients who underwent TURP with a preliminary diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were evaluated. The prevalence of IPC was calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore independent predictive factors of IPC. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were included. IPC was diagnosed in 12 patients (4.7%). The mean age of the patients and the mean prostate volume were 69.8±7.07 years and 89.3±49.29 mL, respectively. The prevalence of IPC was higher in the TRUS guided prostate biopsy group than in the transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy group (11 of 203 [5.4%] vs. 1 of 50 [2.0%], p=0.47), but the difference was not statistically significant. Our results indicated that older age (≥70 y) (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.27; p=0.025) and smaller prostate volume (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.938-0.998; p=0.039) were associated with an increased incidence of IPC after TURP. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the prevalence of IPC may be higher among patients who undergo transrectal prostate biopsy before TURP than among those who undergo transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy. Older age and smaller prostate volume were independent predictors of increasing the risk for IPC after TURP.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Idoso , Biópsia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultados Negativos , Prevalência , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/efeitos adversos
8.
Urol Oncol ; 40(5): 191.e9-191.e14, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35168882

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the cancer detection rate and complications of transrectal prostate biopsy (TRBx) and transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBx) in the hospital. However, given the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in TPBx remains controversial according to the current guidelines, we also investigated the safety and side effects of TPBx with and without antibiotic prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 777 patients who underwent prostate biopsy were enrolled in this study in accordance with the criteria. The primary outcome was pooled infectious complications (sepsis, fever, symptomatic urinary tract infection and urinary retention), and the secondary outcome was prostate cancer detection rate. RESULTS: Findings showed that TPBx and TRBx were equivalent in terms of prostate cancer detection rate (TPBx: 50.4% vs. TRBx: 47.3%; P = 0.424) and urinary retention (TPBx: 5% vs. TRBx: 6.3%; P = 0.451). However, TRBx had significantly higher incidences of sepsis (risk ratios, RR: 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-11.03; P = 0.014) and symptomatic urinary tract infection (RR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.07-8.66; P = 0.029) than TPBx. Notably, for TPBx, patients who received a single dose of cephazolin prophylaxis were not associated with the risk of sepsis (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.13-4.63; P = 0.783) and symptomatic urinary tract infection (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.24-5.74; P = 0.848) in contrast to patients who did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis. Meanwhile, no effects on prostate cancer detection rate and urinary retention were observed in the TPBx group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that TPBx significantly reduced infectious complications compared with TRBx and should therefore be preferred. Importantly, we need to re-examine whether the antibiotic prophylaxis should be routinely applied before TPBx in consideration of increasing antibiotic resistance. This result complements the current national guidelines. Nevertheless, future studies on this topic with improved quality and increased sample size are still needed to minimise bacterial resistance.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Sepse , Retenção Urinária , Infecções Urinárias , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Biópsia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Masculino , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Retenção Urinária/prevenção & controle , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle
9.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 48(6): 915-929, Nov.-Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1405157

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Background: This study aimed to explore the prevalence and clinical risk factors in patients diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer (IPC) during certain surgeries (transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP], open prostatectomy [OP], and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate [HoLEP]) after clinically suspected benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods: Literature search of the MEDILINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify eligible studies published before June 2021. Multivariate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the prevalence and clinical risk factors of IPC were calculated using random or fixed-effect models. Results: Twenty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. Amongst the 94.783 patients, IPC was detected in 24.715 (26.1%). Results showed that the chance of IPC detection (10%, 95% CI: 0.07-4.00; P<0.001; I2=97%) in patients treated with TURP is similar to that of patients treated with HoLEP (9%, 95% CI: 0.07-0.11; P<0.001; I2=81.4%). However, the pooled prevalence estimate of patients treated with OP was 11% (95% CI: −0.03-0.25; P=0.113; I2=99.1%) with no statistical significance. We observed increased incidence of IPC diagnosis after BPH surgery amongst patients with higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.23; P=0.004; I2=89%), whereas no effect of age (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.97-1.06; P=0.48; I2=78.8%) and prostate volume (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96-1.03; P=0.686; I2=80.5%) were observed. Conclusions: The prevalence of IPC was similar amongst patients undergoing TURP, HoLEP, and OP for presumed BPH. Interestingly, increased PSA level was the only independent predictor of increasing risk of IPC after BPH surgery rather than age and prostate volume. Hence, future research should focus on predictors which accurately foretell the progression of prostate cancer to determine the optimal treatment for managing patients with IPC after BPH surgery.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA