The perioperative outcomes of eversion carotid endarterectomy in diabetic patients aged 80 years or older.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty exists about the influence of advanced age and diabetes mellitus on the clinical effect of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study analyzed the perioperative (30-day) outcomes of CEA in diabetic patients aged ≥80 years. METHODS: Data of 1872 consecutive patients who underwent 2125 primary eversion CEAs from 1990 to 2014 at our institution were prospectively stored in a vascular surgery registry. Risk factors, medication, and indication for surgery were recorded. The 354 patients (387 CEAs) aged ≥80 years formed the study base; of whom, 207 (219 CEAs) were diabetic and 147 (168 CEAs) were not. A neurologist assessed all patients preoperatively, on waking from the anesthesia, and before discharge from the hospital. All procedures were eversion CEA performed by the same surgeon under general anesthesia with routine electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting. RESULTS: Diabetic patients were more likely to have arterial hypertension (P = .033), cardiac disease (P = .038), peripheral aneurysmal/atherosclerotic disease (P = .046), and contralateral carotid occlusion (P = .042) than their nondiabetic counterparts. Overall, there were no deaths, two (0.51%) perioperative strokes (both in diabetic patients), and 13 nonfatal cardiac complications (3.3%), of which 10 occurred in diabetic patients, but the difference failed to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study show that CEA is safe and effective for stroke prevention in diabetic patients aged ≥80 years, with a negligible incidence of perioperative adverse events and no deaths.

Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis in the very elderly.

BACKGROUND: The indication for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is uncertain in patients with asymptomatic severe (≥60% luminal narrowing according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria) carotid stenosis (ASCS), especially in the very elderly, because current evidence suggests that the risk of future stroke has been dropping in the past two decades owing to the recent advances in medical therapy. The aim of this observational study was to compare early and late outcomes in patients ≥80 years old with ASCS treated with CEA plus best medical treatment (BMT) or with BMT alone. METHODS: From 2005 to 2012, 69 octogenarians with ASCS underwent CEA plus BMT (group 1), and another 54 received BMT alone (group 2). All operations were eversion CEAs. BMT included lipid-lowering drugs, new antiplatelet and antihypertensive agents, avoidance of smoking, careful blood pressure and glycemic control, and lifestyle changes. Follow-up with serial ultrasonographic examination was obtained in 118 patients for a median 4.4-year period. RESULTS: There were no perioperative (30-day) strokes or deaths and one transient ischemic attack (1.4%). One late minor stroke developed in a CEA patient (1.5%). No late restenoses or occlusions were detected. Five patients in group 2 (9.6%) became symptomatic (one transient ischemic attack and four minor strokes) and subsequently underwent successful CEA; all their carotid plaques were complicated by ulceration and intraplaque hemorrhage (with plaque progression in four cases), confirmed by computed tomography images. The rate of freedom from cerebral ischemic events at 5 years showed a significant benefit for elderly patients who had CEA vis-à-vis those who did not (98% vs 84%; P = .04), and so did the 5-year rate of freedom from ipsilateral carotid disease progression (100% vs 91%; P = .01). At 5 years, the mortality rate was comparable for elderly patients whether they had CEA or not (66% vs 68%; P = .65). CONCLUSIONS: CEA is a safe, effective, and durable treatment for ASCS in patients aged 80 years or more, carrying an insignificant perioperative stroke/death risk. CEA associated with BMT seems preferable to BMT alone in preventing the risk of ipsilateral ischemic events, without translating into a longer survival.

Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients with Ipsilateral Intracranial Stenosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The risk of perioperative stroke and the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remain uncertain in the case of an ipsilateral intracranial stenosis. The aim of this observational study was to analyze the early and late outcomes of CEA in patients with a carotid tandem lesion (CTL), defined as a severe stenosis at the bifurcation with any concomitant lesion ≥50 % involving the intracranial portion of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery or the main trunk of the anterior or middle cerebral artery. METHODS: From 2000 to 2009, 1143 patients underwent CEA for symptomatic or asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis according to the NASCET and ACAS recommendations, respectively. CTLs were diagnosed in 219 patients (19.2 %) by extracranial and transcranial color-coded Doppler sonography combined with noninvasive brain imaging studies. The primary endpoints of the study were perioperative (30-day) stroke and death, and any ipsilateral ischemic adverse events during the follow-up, which ranged from 0.1 to 10 years (mean 4.9 ± 3.3 years). The rates of the primary endpoints were compared between patients with (group I) and without CTL (group II). RESULTS: Overall, 219 CEAs were performed in group I and 924 in group II. Nearly two in three of the carotid lesions (777 of 1143, 68 %) were symptomatic at presentation (62.1 % in group I vs 69.4 % in group II; p = 0.03), with a 23.8 % rate of stroke (21.9 % in group I vs 24.2 % in group II; p = 0.85). There were 2 (0.9 %) perioperative ipsilateral strokes in group I and 5 (0.5 %) in group II (p = 0.62), and no deaths. The 5-year ipsilateral stroke-free, any stroke-free, and overall survival rates did not differ significantly between patients with and without CTL. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that patients with and without CTL who underwent CEA had a similar occurrence of perioperative adverse events (probably due to the extremely low incidence of perioperative complications) and comparable late outcomes, suggesting that the presence of CTL does not justify refusing CEA for patients who could benefit from it.

Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic low-grade carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Although the management of carotid disease is well established for symptomatic lesions ≥ 70%, the surgical treatment for a symptomatic ≤ 50% stenosis is not supported by data from randomized trials. Factors other than lumen narrowing, such as plaque instability, seem to be involved in cerebral and retinal ischemic events. This study analyzes the early-term and long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed in patients with low-grade (≤ 50% on North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria) symptomatic carotid stenosis. METHODS: The study involves 57 consecutive patients undergoing CEA for symptomatic low-grade carotid disease at our institution over 5 years, and 21 (36.8%) had experienced more than one ischemic event. Overall, 48 (84.2%) had a minor stroke, and nine (15.8%) had an episode of retinal ischemia. Diagnosis was made by a vascular neurologist based on an ultrasound examination combined with noninvasive imaging studies, after ruling out other possible causes of embolization. Before CEA, all patients were receiving antiplatelet treatment, and 87% were taking statins. All patients underwent eversion CEA under general deep anesthesia, with selective shunting. All carotid plaques were examined histologically. Long-term follow-up (median, 28 months; mean, 32 ± 5 months; range, 3-56 months) was obtained for 55 patients. RESULTS: No 30-day strokes or deaths occurred, and no patients had recurrent neurologic events related to the revascularized hemisphere during the follow-up. No late carotid occlusions were detected, but one asymptomatic moderate restenosis was documented. There were seven late deaths (12.7%), none of which were stroke-related. Survival rates were 98% at 1 year and 90% at 3 years. All removed carotid plaques showed different features of ulceration or rupture, with underlying hemorrhage associated with a thrombus. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that CEA is a safe, effective, and durable treatment for patients with symptomatic low-grade carotid stenosis associated with unstable plaque. Patients had excellent protection against further ischemic events and survived long enough to justify the initial surgical risk. Plaque instability seems to play a major part in the onset of ischemic events, regardless the entity of lumen narrowing.

Lower extremity arterial reconstruction for critical limb ischemia in diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The impact of diabetes mellitus on the technical and clinical outcomes of infrainguinal arterial reconstruction (IAR) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains controversial. This study analyzed the outcome of IAR in diabetic patients with CLI over a 17-year period. METHODS: Details on all consecutive patients undergoing primary IAR at our institution were stored prospectively in a vascular registry from 1995 to 2011. Demographics, risk factors, indications for surgery, inflow sources and outflow target vessels, types of conduit, and adverse outcomes were analyzed. Postoperative surveillance included clinical examination, duplex scans, and ankle-brachial index measurements in all patients at discharge, 1 and 6 months after surgery, and every 6 months thereafter. End points were patency, limb salvage, survival, and amputation-free survival rates, and were assessed using Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis. The χ(2) or Fisher exact, Student t, and log-rank tests were used to establish statistical significance. RESULTS: Overall, 1407 IARs were performed in 1310 patients with CLI by the same surgeon, 705 (50.2%) in 643 diabetic patients and 702 in 667 nondiabetic patients. Autogenous vein conduits were used in 87% of the IARs. There were no perioperative deaths. Diabetic patients had significantly more major (16.7% vs 11.8%; P = .02) and minor complications (9.7% vs 6.5%; P = .02) than nondiabetic patients. At 5 and 10 years, there were no significant differences between diabetic and nondiabetic patients in the rates of primary patency (65% and 46% vs 69.5% and 57%; log-rank test, P = .09), secondary patency (76% and 60% vs 80% and 68%; log-rank test, P = .20), limb salvage (88% and 76% vs 91% and 83%; log-rank test, P = .12) survival (51% and 34% vs 57% and 38%; log-rank test, P = .41), or amputation-free survival (45.5% and 27% vs 51% and 29%; log-rank test, P = .19). The type of conduit did not affect patency or limb salvage rates in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients receiving IAR for CLI can have the same survival and amputation-free survival rates as nondiabetic patients. Their comparable technical and clinical outcomes strongly demonstrate that diabetics with CLI can expect the same quantity and quality of life as nondiabetics with CLI, and aggressive attempts at limb salvage in patients with diabetes mellitus, including distal and foot level bypass grafting, should not be discouraged.

Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains the gold standard for treating carotid disease in selected symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, though carotid angioplasty and stenting has emerged as a safe alternative. The aim of this study was to assess the durability of CEA in a large series of patients followed up according to a strict clinical and ultrasonographic protocol. METHODS: Over a 23-year period (1990-2012) a total of 1773 patients (1251 men and 522 women) with a mean age of 75.2 years (range, 31 to 96 years) who underwent 2007 consecutive primary eversion CEAs performed by the same surgeon under general anesthesia with electroencephalographic monitoring and selective shunting were prospectively followed up with ultrasonography at 1, 6, and 12 months, then yearly. A long-term follow-up (median, 11.2 years; mean, 12.9 years) was obtained for 1680 patients (94.8%). End points were perioperative (30-day) stroke and death and late carotid restenosis/occlusion rates. RESULTS: More than two in three of the lesions (1446 of 2007, 72.1%) were symptomatic at the time of surgery, with a 25% rate of preoperative stroke. Preoperative antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy was used by 1675 patients (94.4%), whereas 918 (51.8%) were receiving statin treatment. Overall, there were eight (0.4%) perioperative strokes and no deaths. During the follow-up, there were nine (0.47%) asymptomatic late carotid restenoses (six moderate [50%-69%] and three severe [≥ 70%]) and one (0.05%) carotid occlusion. Nine patients (0.47%) had late ipsilateral strokes, none of them related to restenosis/occlusion. Overall, there were 159 late deaths (9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that eversion CEA can be performed in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with an extremely low perioperative stroke/death risk and a negligible incidence of late restenosis/occlusion, thus assuring a persistently good protection against the risk of cerebral ischemia.

Using protamine can significantly reduce the incidence of bleeding complications after carotid endarterectomy without increasing the risk of ischemic cerebral events.

BACKGROUND: Controversy persists regarding the use of protamine sulfate (PS) during carotid endarterectomy (CEA), chiefly because of conflicting experiences reporting both less bleeding and a higher stroke risk. The goal of the present study was to test the hypothesis that reversing heparin with PS after CEA significantly reduces the incidence of bleeding complications without increasing the risk of postoperative stroke. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2012 all consecutive patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia at our institution received 5,000 U of heparin prior to carotid clamping, which was partially (half-dose) reversed with PS 25 mg immediately after declamping (group I). Heparinization had never been reversed with PS in earlier CEAs performed from 1998 to 2009 at the same institution (group II). All patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively by a neurologist, and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all group I patients to exclude any silent cerebral infarction. End points of the study were bleeding complications, perioperative (30-day) stroke, and death. RESULTS: Overall, 219 CEAs (201 patients) were performed in group I, and 1,458 CEAs (1,294 patients) in group II. Demographics, risk factors, and preoperative antiplatelet medication were comparable in the two groups. The incidence of adverse events (group I vs group II) was as follows: stroke (0 vs 0.5 % [8/1,458], p = 0.27); death (0 vs 0 %); neck bleeding (0 vs 8.2 % [120/1,458], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study demonstrate that (1) partially neutralizing heparin with PS after CEA can significantly reduce the risk of bleeding complications, and (2) there is no association between the administration of PS and the incidence of postoperative stroke.

Jugular veins in transient global amnesia: innocent bystanders.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transient global amnesia (TGA) has been associated with an increased prevalence of internal jugular valve insufficiency and many patients report Valsalva-associated maneuvers before TGA onset. These findings have led to the assumption of hemodynamic alterations in intracranial veins inducing focal hippocampal ischemia. We investigated this hypothesis in patients with TGA and control subjects. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with TGA and 75 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects were enrolled into a cross-sectional study. Extracranial and transcranial high-resolution venous echo-color-Doppler sonography was performed blindly in all patients and control subjects. Blood flow direction and velocities were recorded at the internal jugular veins, basal veins of Rosenthal, and vein of Galen, both at rest and during Valsalva-associated maneuvers. RESULTS: Mean age of patients with TGA was 60.3±8.0 years (median, 60 years; range, 44-78 years); 44 (59%) were female (female/male ratio: 1.42). Internal jugular valve insufficiency (left, right, or bilateral) was found to be more frequent in patients with TGA than in control subjects: 53 (70.7%) versus 22 (29.3%; P<0.05). Blood flow velocities in the deep cerebral veins of patients with TGA did not differ from control subjects both at rest and during Valsalva-associated maneuvers. Intracranial venous reflux was neither observed in patients with TGA nor in control subjects despite unilateral or bilateral internal jugular valve insufficiency during prolonged and maximal Valsalva-associated maneuvers. CONCLUSIONS: This study, although confirming the association between TGA and internal jugular valve insufficiency, challenges the hypothesis that cerebral venous congestion plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of TGA.

Reconstructive surgery for complex aortoiliac occlusive disease in young adults.

BACKGROUND: Although aortoiliofemoral bypass grafting is the optimal revascularization method for patients with severe aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), previous studies have documented poor patency rates in young adults. This study investigated whether young patients with AIOD have worse outcomes in patency, limb salvage, and long-term survival rates after reconstructive surgery than their older counterparts. METHODS: Patients aged≤50 years undergoing reconstructive surgery at our institution for AIOD between 1995 and 2010 were compared with a cohort of randomly selected patients aged≥60 years (two for each of the young patients, matched for year of operation), analyzing demographics, risk factors, indications for surgery, operative details, and outcomes. RESULTS: Among 927 consecutive patients undergoing primary surgery for AIOD, 78 (8.4%) aged≤50 years (mean age, 48.4 years) and 156 older control patients (mean age, 71.2 years) were identified. The younger patients were mainly men (81%) and 59% had surgery for limb salvage and 41% for disabling claudication (P=.02). Compared with older patients, they were significantly more likely to be smokers (90% vs 72%; P=.002) and had previously needed significantly more inflow procedures (28% vs 16%; P=.03). Only one death occurred perioperatively (30-day) among the control patients, and no major amputations or graft infections occurred in either group. The need for subsequent infrainguinal reconstructions was greater in the younger patients (18% vs 7%; P=.01). The primary patency rates were inferior in the younger patients at 5 years (82% and 75%) and 10 years (95% and 90%; P=.01), whereas assisted secondary patency (89% and 82% vs 96% and 91%; P=.08), secondary patency (93% and 86% vs 98% and 92%; P=.19), limb salvage (88% and 83% vs 95% and 91%; P=.13), and survival rates (87% and 76% vs 91% and 84%; P=.32) were comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that despite a higher primary graft failure rate than that in older patients, aortoiliofemoral revascularization for complex AIOD is a safe procedure for younger patients with disabling claudication or limb-threatening ischemia, providing they are willing to follow a regular protocol to complete their postoperative surveillance and to undergo graft revision as necessary.

The impact of gender on outcome after infrainguinal arterial reconstructions for peripheral occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE: The role of gender on the outcome of infrainguinal arterial revascularization (IAR) for peripheral arterial occlusive disease remains uncertain. This study analyzed the outcome of IARs performed over 15 years, stratifying the results by sex. METHODS: Details of consecutive patients undergoing primary IAR for peripheral arterial occlusive disease from 1995 to 2009 at our institution were prospectively stored in a vascular registry. Demographics, risk factors, indications for surgery, inflow sources, outflow target vessels, types of conduit, and adverse outcomes were analyzed. Postoperative surveillance included clinical examination supplemented with duplex scans and ankle-brachial index measurements in all patients at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. End points of the study, ie, patency, limb salvage, and survival rates, were assessed using Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis. The χ(2) or Fisher exact, Student t, and log-rank tests were used to establish statistical significance. RESULTS: Our sample consisted of 1459 IARs performed in 1333 patients, comprising 496 women (37.2%; 531 IARs), who were a mean 3 years older than the men (74 vs 71 years; P < .001) and had a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (52% vs 46%; P = .03) and surgery for limb salvage (91% vs 87%; P = .02). An autogenous vein conduit (great or small saphenous, or both, spliced, arm, or composite veins) was used in 87% of the IARs. No deaths occurred perioperatively (30 days). The major and minor complication rates were comparable between men and women. At 10 years, the primary patency rate was 47% in women vs 49% in men (P = .67), the assisted primary patency rate was, respectively, 53% vs 50% (P = .69), the secondary patency rate was 61% vs 61% (P = .66), limb salvage rate was 93% vs 91% (P = .54), and survival rate was 43% vs 49% (P = .65). Stratifying by type of conduit revealed no differences in patency or limb salvage rates. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an older age and more advanced stages of disease on presentation in women, IAR performed in women can achieve patency and limb salvage rates statistically no different from those recorded in their male counterparts, supporting the conviction that sex per se does not influence the outcome of lower extremity revascularization.

Gender-based outcomes after eversion carotid endarterectomy from 1998 to 2009.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although the benefit of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in reducing the risk of stroke in selected symptomatic and asymptomatic patients has been well documented, the higher incidence of adverse events after CEA for women than for men remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of female gender on perioperative (30-day) and long-term outcomes after eversion CEA (eCEA). METHODS: Patients entered into a prospectively compiled computerized database of all primary consecutive eCEAs performed at our institution from September 1998 to December 2009 were analyzed. Endpoints were perioperative death and stroke, late carotid restenosis or occlusion, and long-term freedom from stroke and survival rates. Long-term follow-up was obtained in 96.8% of patients (97.5% of the women). RESULTS: Among 1294 patients who underwent 1458 eCEAs under general anesthesia with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring and selective shunting, 409 (31.6%) were women (466 eCEAs). More women than men were over 80 years old (P = .001), and female patients were more likely to have arterial hypertension (P = .02) or hyperlipidemia (P = .006) than male patients. Preoperative statin medication (P = .01), contralateral carotid occlusion (P = .02), and shunting use (P = .03) were more frequent among female patients. No perioperative deaths occurred in the series as a whole, while the perioperative stroke risk (0.6% vs 0.5%), and the combined late carotid restenosis and occlusion rate (1.1% vs 0.4%) were comparable between female and male patients. The 7-year stroke-free survival and overall survival rates did not differ significantly between female and male patients (98.3% vs 98.8% and 87.2% vs 93.8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This single-center university hospital study shows that although women have a different cardiovascular risk profile from men when they undergo eCEA, there is no evidence of a different gender effect on perioperative and long-term outcomes.

Open Surgical Thrombendarterectomy Versus Endovascular Treatment in Occlusive Processes of the Femoral Artery Bifurcation.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of occlusive processes of the femoral artery bifurcation is thrombendarterectomy (TEA). Endovascular techniques (ENDO) have recently been put forward as a potential alternative. It is unclear so far which modality yields better outcomes with respect to long-term revascularization and periprocedural complications. Method: Multiple databases were systematically searched for pertinent publications (publication date November 1965 to February 2022). From the included studies, individual patient data (IPD) were requested. Aggregate data (AD) were used when no IPD were available. Primary and secondary patency (PP and SP), perioperative morbidity/mortality, and further endpoints were determined separately for TEA and ENDO and compared with each other. AD for each modality were summarized in meta-analyses. Time-to-event analyses and comparative meta-analyses with PP as primary endpoint were carried out using IPD. Results: 42 studies (3 IPD, 39 AD; 27 TEA, 12 ENDO, 3 comparisons of TEA versus ENDO) were included. In the combined meta-analysis of IPD and AD, PP for TEA was 97% at 6 months and 92% at 12 months, while PP for ENDO was 84% at 6 months and 85% at 12 months. The differences were not statistically significant. The comparative meta-analysis regarding PP did not reveal any significant differences either (TEA versus ENDO: HR 0.30 [0.06; 1.48]). SP at 12 months was 97% (TEA) and 93% (ENDO). The periprocedural morbidity was 16% for TEA and 9% for ENDO. Conclusion: In light of a higher PP, even without formal statistical proof of superiority, TEA can still be considered the standard treatment for occlusive processes of the femoral artery bifurcation. METHODS: Multiple databases were systematically searched for pertinent publications (publication date November 1965 to February 2022). From the included studies, individual patient data (IPD) were requested. Aggregate data (AD) were used when no IPD were available. Primary and secondary patency (PP and SP), perioperative morbidity/mortality, and further endpoints were determined separately for TEA and ENDO and compared with each other. AD for each modality were summarized in meta-analyses. Time-to-event analyses and comparative meta-analyses with PP as primary endpoint were carried out using IPD. RESULTS: 42 studies (3 IPD, 39 AD; 27 TEA, 12 ENDO, 3 comparisons of TEA versus ENDO) were included. In the combined meta-analysis of IPD and AD, PP for TEA was 97% at 6 months and 92% at 12 months, while PP for ENDO was 84% at 6 months and 85% at 12 months. The differences were not statistically significant. The comparative meta-analysis regarding PP did not reveal any significant differences either (TEA versus ENDO: HR 0.30 [0.06; 1.48]). SP at 12 months was 97% (TEA) and 93% (ENDO). The periprocedural morbidity was 16% for TEA and 9% for ENDO. CONCLUSION: In light of a higher PP, even without formal statistical proof of superiority, TEA can still be considered the standard treatment for occlusive processes of the femoral artery bifurcation.

Predictors of neck bleeding after eversion carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify predictors for neck bleeding after eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA). METHODS: A prospectively compiled computerized database of all primary eCEAs performed at a tertiary referral center between September 1998 and December 2009 was analyzed. The end point was any neck bleeding after eCEA. End point predictors were identified by univariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 1458 eCEAs performed by the same surgeon on 1294 patients under general anesthesia with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring and selective shunting, there were five major and three minor perioperative strokes (0.5%), and no deaths. Neck bleeding after eCEA occurred in 120 cases (8.2%), of which 69 (4.7%) needed re-exploration. Univariate analysis (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) identified preoperative antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel (1.77 [1.20-2.62], P = .004), particularly when continued to the day before CEA (3.84 [2.01-7.33], P < .001), and postoperative hypertension (9.44 [6.34-14.06], P < .001) as risk factors for neck bleeding in general and for neck bleeding requiring re-exploration (4.50 [1.85-10.89], P = .001; 15.27 [2.08-104.43], P = .006, and 2.44 [1.12-5.30], P = .02, respectively). An increased risk of neck bleeding in general was associated with clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid (12.00 [2.59-56.78], P = .005), acetylsalicylic acid alone (4.37 [1.99-9.57], P < .001), and ticlopidine (2.49 [1.10-5.63], P = .02) only when they were continued to the day before CEA. No neck bleeding was associated with preoperative treatment with dipyridamole or warfarin, or no medication. No further complications occurred in the patients who underwent re-exploration. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this single-center university hospital study show that neck bleeding after CEA is relatively common but is not associated with an increased risk of stroke or death. Preoperative treatment with clopidogrel, particularly when it is continued to the day before surgery, and postoperative arterial hypertension seem to be associated with a higher risk of neck bleeding after CEA, requiring re-exploration in most cases. Other antiplatelet agents appear to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative neck bleeding only if they are continued to the day before CEA. Larger studies are warranted to confirm our findings and prevent this feared surgical complication.

Predictors of electroencephalographic changes needing shunting during carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is associated with a risk of cerebral ischemia during carotid clamping, hence various cerebral protection strategies, including pharmacological management and routine or selective shunting, are commonly available. This study aimed to analyze the results of CEA with intraoperative electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring to identify factors associated with EEG changes consistent with cerebral ischemia which needed shunting. METHODS: A prospectively compiled, computerized database of all primary CEAs performed at our institution with EEG monitoring for symptomatic or asymptomatic severe carotid lesions between January 1990 and June 2009 was analyzed. RESULTS: In all, 1,914 CEA procedures were performed on 1,696 patients, of which 218 had staged bilateral CEAs. EEG changes were recorded in 392 patients (20.5%), but a shunt was inserted during 312 CEA procedures (16.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that a symptomatic presentation (odds ratio [OR], 1.37; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.07-1.76; p = 0.012), prior stroke (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.66-3.13; p < 0.001), contralateral carotid occlusion (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.18-3.91; p = 0.019), and moderate (<80%) ipsilateral carotid disease (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.08-3.52; p = 0.033) predicted the need for shunting. CONCLUSIONS: EEG was an excellent detector of cerebral ischemia and a valuable tool in guiding the need for shunting. Patients who were symptomatic or had a history of stroke, a contralateral carotid occlusion, or an ipsilateral moderate carotid stenosis were more prone to EEG changes consistent with cerebral ischemia. Surgeons should consider EEG changes during clamping as an effective criterion for selective shunting.

Surgical versus conservative management for subclinical Cushing syndrome in adrenal incidentalomas: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcome of patients with subclinical Cushing syndrome (SCS) due to an adrenal incidentaloma (the autonomous hypersecretion of a small amount of cortisol, which is not enough to cause clinically-evident disease) who underwent surgery or were managed conservatively. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The most appropriate management of SCS patients is controversial, either adrenalectomy or close follow-up being recommended for their treatment. METHODS: Over a 15-year period, 45 SCS patients were randomly selected to undergo surgery (n = 23) or conservative management (n = 22). All surgical procedures were laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed by the same surgeon. All patients were followed up (mean, 7.7 years; range, 2-17 years) clinically by 2 experienced endocrinologists 6 and 12 months after surgery and then yearly, or yearly after joining the trial, particularly monitoring diabetes mellitus (DM), arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and osteoporosis. The study end point was the clinical outcome of SCS patients who underwent adrenalectomy versus those managed conservatively. RESULTS: All 23 patients in the surgical arm had elective surgery. Another 3 patients randomly assigned to conservative management crossed over to the surgical group due to an increasing adrenal mass >3.5 cm. In the surgical group, DM normalized or improved in 62.5% of patients (5 of 8), hypertension in 67% (12 of 18), hyperlipidemia in 37.5% (3 of 8), and obesity in 50% (3 of 6). No changes in bone parameters were seen after surgery in SCS patients with osteoporosis. On the other hand, some worsening of DM, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia was noted in conservatively-managed patients. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, laparoscopic adrenalectomy performed by skilled surgeons appears more beneficial than conservative management for SCS patients complying with our selection criteria. This trial is registered with Australian Clinical Trials Registry number, ANZCTR12608000567325.

Early and long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in the very elderly: an 18-year single-center study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perioperative (30-day) and long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in elderly patients with severe symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid disease. Although the efficacy of CEA in preventing stroke in selected patients has been clearly demonstrated, concern has been expressed about the role of CEA in people over 80 years old. METHODS: An analysis was conducted on a prospectively compiled computerized database of all primary CEAs performed at our institution from 1990 to 2007. Descriptive demographic data, risk factors, surgical details, perioperative strokes and deaths, and other complications were recorded. All patients underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound scanning and clinical follow-up at one, six, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier life-tables. Long-term relative survival after CEA was assessed against age- and gender-matched controls. RESULTS: In all, 1769 CEAs were performed in 1562 patients, 193 of them (207 CEAs; group I) were > or = 80 years old and 1371 were younger (1562 CEAs; group II). All CEA procedures were performed with patients under deep general anesthesia with continuous perioperative EEG monitoring for selective shunting. No strokes or deaths occurred in group I, whereas there were 11 perioperative strokes and three deaths in group II (1%). A complete follow-up (median, 5.2 years) was obtained in 185 elderly patients: no late occlusions or restenoses were detected, while the seven-year freedom from stroke and death were 96.6% and 52.4%, respectively. The relative seven-year survival rate was 99.8%. CONCLUSIONS: CEA in elderly patients proved safe and effective, with an excellent long-term durability. The long-term relative survival after CEA in elderly patients was better than in an age-and gender-matched population, so the likelihood of living long enough to benefit from CEA is not jeopardized by being very elderly.

Factors influencing the rising rates of adrenal surgery: analysis of a 25-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal surgery has been radically changed by laparoscopy and it is reasonable to wonder whether the increase in the number of adrenalectomies is entirely justified. There is still debate on the transperitoneal versus the retroperitoneal approach, the advantages and drawbacks of which are discussed here. METHODS: Between 1983 and 2007, we performed 279 adrenalectomies in 264 consecutive patients, divided into two groups: before and after the advent of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). We analyzed the factors that increased the number of adrenalectomies in recent years. The LAs were further divided into three consecutive periods and the morbidity and conversion rates, and mean operating times were compared. RESULTS: More procedures were performed after the advent of LA, i.e., 55 (19.7%) beforehand versus 224 (80.3%) afterwards, irrespective of the type of disease, for instance: incidentaloma, 17.6% versus 82.4% (p \ 0.0001); pheochromocytoma, 20.7% versus 79.3% (p\0.0001); Conn's disease, 19.8% versus 80.2% (p \ 0.0001); Cushing's disease, 17.2% versus 82.8% (p\0.0001); cortical carcinoma, 30% versus 70% (p\0.001). Analyzing the three LA periods, operating times were the only statistically significant variable (p\0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The progressive increase in the number of adrenalectomies performed is due more to a better understanding of adrenal disease than to the availability of minimally invasive techniques. The choice of a laparoscopic approach (trans- or retroperitoneal) should depend on the surgeon's experience.

Vasomotion in multiple spontaneous cervical artery dissections.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The etiology of spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCAD) is still unknown, even though an underlying arteriopathy impairing vasomotion has often been suspected. This study was undertaken to investigate: (1) spontaneous, (2) endothelial-dependent, and (3) endothelial-independent vasodilation in patients with multiple sCAD. METHODS: In 19 consecutive patients with multiple carotid or vertebral artery dissections high-resolution ultrasound was used to assess spontaneous and endothelial-independent dilations (isosorbide dinitrate-mediated) in the common carotid, vertebral and brachial arteries, and endothelial-dependent dilation (flow-mediated arterial dilation) in the brachial arteries alone. The same parameters were measured in 19 healthy subjects matched for age, sex, and height (controls). Ultrasound studies were performed by one investigator, and off-line analysis by another investigator who was blinded to the clinical data and study status (patient or control). RESULTS: Spontaneous and endothelial-independent dilations were significantly impaired in the carotid (P=0.0006 and P<0.0001, respectively) and vertebral arteries (P=0.0121 and P=0.0047, respectively) of patients as compared with controls, whereas no statistically significant differences were found in the brachial arteries; conversely, endothelial-dependent dilation of the brachial arteries was significantly lower in patients as compared with controls (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with multiple sCADs have a significantly impaired vasomotion, which may predispose to dissection.

Carotid endarterectomy within 2 weeks of minor ischemic stroke: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Data from multicenter symptomatic trials have shown that benefit from carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was greatest in patients with carotid disease operated within 2 weeks of their last ischemic event. We prospectively analyzed the safety and benefit of CEA performed within 2 weeks of a stroke. METHODS: The study involved patients with acute minor stroke admitted to two stroke units who underwent CEA within 2 weeks of their last ischemic event, once they were considered neurologically stable. Preoperative workup included scoring ischemia-related symptoms according to a modified ranking scale (mRS), carotid duplex scan, transcranial Doppler ultrasound, and head computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. All patients underwent neurological assessment on admission, 1 day before and 2 days after CEA, and at discharge. A complete neurological and ultrasound follow-up was performed at 1, 6, and 12 months after CEA, then yearly. All procedures were eversion CEA under deep general anesthesia, with selective shunting. Endpoints were perioperative (30-day) stroke/mortality rate or cerebral bleeding and long-term stroke recurrence or cerebral hemorrhage. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2005, 102 patients with a mRS

Infrapopliteal arterial revascularization for limb-threatening ischemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to ascertain whether infrapopliteal arterial revascularization (IAR) for limb-threatening ischemia is worthwhile in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: With prospectively entered data from a university teaching hospital's vascular registry, we reviewed the records of all patients with CKD who underwent IAR between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2002. Primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates, limb salvage, patient survival and amputation-free survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Factors influencing the outcome were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Eighty-seven consecutive patients underwent 93 IARs; more than half (53%) of the patients were diabetic and nearly all (84%) had foot tissue loss. No patients died during the perioperative (30-day) period. At 1 and 5 years, primary patency rates were 92.3% and 77.2% in the series as a whole, 89.5% and 71.4% for diabetics vs. 95.3% and 83.4% for nondiabetics (p=0.164), and 78.9% and 49.1% for patients on dialysis vs. 95.7% and 85.3% for those not on dialysis (p=0.006). At 1 and 5 years, the secondary patency rates were 93.4% and 85.6% in the series as a whole, 91.7% and 82.1% for diabetics vs. 95.3% and 88.7% for nondiabetics (p=0.381), and 84.2% and 68% for patients on dialysis vs. 95.7% and 90.1% for those not on dialysis (p=0.002). At 1 and 5 years, the limb salvage rates were 96.8% and 80.6% in the series as a whole, 98% and 71.4% for diabetics vs. 100% and 88.7% for nondiabetics (p=0.104), and 94.7% and 61.7% for patients on dialysis vs 97.3% and 85.9% for those not on dialysis (p=0.020). There were 31 late deaths in the series as a whole, with a 5-year survival rate of 62.5%. At 1 and 5 years, the amputation-free survival probabilities were 93.4% and 54.4% in the series as a whole, 91.7% and 38.6% for diabetics vs. 95.2% and 70.2% for nondiabetics (p=0.011), and 89.5% and 39% for patients on dialysis vs. 94.4% and 58.8% for those not on dialysis (p=0.097). The dialysis treatment was the only predictor of primary patency failure (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall outcome was poorer in patients on dialysis, IARs for limb-threatening ischemia in patients with CKD can achieve satisfactory results in terms of graft patency, limb salvage and amputation-free survival, especially if the tissue loss is manageable and an adequate autologous conduit is available.