RESUMO
PURPOSE: Recently, endotracheal tubes with an embedded temperature sensor in the inner surface of the tube cuff (temperature tracheal tubes) have been developed. We sought to assess whether temperature tracheal tubes show a good agreement with esophageal temperature probes during surgery. METHODS: We enrolled 40 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery in an observational study. The tracheas of all patients were intubated with a temperature tracheal tube, and an esophageal temperature probe was inserted into the esophagus. Tracheal and esophageal temperatures were recorded at 15-min intervals until the end of surgery. Temperatures from both devices were analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis, four-quadrant plots, and polar plots. RESULTS: We analyzed 261 data points from 36 patients. Temperatures ranges were 34.2 °C to 36.6 °C for the tracheal temperature tube and 34.7 °C to 37.2 °C for the esophageal temperature probe. Bland-Altman analysis showed an acceptable agreement between the two devices, with an overall mean bias (95% limit of agreement) of -0.3 °C (-0.8 °C to 0.1 °C) and a percentage error of 3%; the trending ability (temperature changes over time) between the two devices showed a concordance rate of 94% in four-quadrant plot (cut-off ≥ 92%), but this was higher than the acceptable mean angular bias of 177° (cut-off < ± 5°) and radial limits of agreement of 52° (cut-off < ± 30°) in the polar plot. Bronchoscopy during extubation and patient interviews at six hours postoperatively revealed no serious injuries related to the use of the temperature tracheal tube. CONCLUSION: The temperature tracheal tube showed an acceptable overall mean bias of -0.3 °C and a percentage error of 3%, but incompatible trending ability with the esophageal temperature probe. STUDY REGISTRATION: cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007265); 22 April 2022.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Récemment, des sondes endotrachéales munies d'un capteur de température intégré dans la surface interne du ballonnet de la sonde (sondes thermiques trachéales) ont été mises au point. Nous avons cherché à évaluer si les sondes trachéales de température montraient une bonne concordance avec les sondes thermiques Åsophagiennes pendant la chirurgie. MéTHODE: Nous avons recruté 40 patient·es ayant bénéficié d'une chirurgie par laparoscopie dans le cadre d'une étude observationnelle. Les trachées de tou·tes les patient·es ont été intubées à l'aide d'une sonde trachéale de température et une sonde thermique Åsophagienne a été insérée dans l'Åsophage. Les températures trachéale et Åsophagienne ont été enregistrées à des intervalles de 15 minutes jusqu'à la fin de la chirurgie. Les températures des deux appareils ont été analysées à l'aide d'une analyse de Bland-Altman, de diagrammes à quatre quadrants et de diagrammes polaires. RéSULTATS: Nous avons analysé 261 points de données provenant de 36 patient·es. Les plages de température allaient de 34,2 °C à 36,6 °C pour la sonde trachéale de température et de 34,7 °C à 37,2 °C pour la sonde thermique Åsophagienne. L'analyse de Bland-Altman a montré une concordance acceptable entre les deux dispositifs, avec un biais moyen global (limite de 95 % de la concordance) de −0,3 °C (−0,8 °C à 0,1 °C) et un pourcentage d'erreur de 3 %; la capacité de tendance (changements de température au fil du temps) entre les deux dispositifs a montré un taux de concordance de 94 % dans un diagramme à quatre quadrants (limite ≥ 92 %), mais cette capacité était plus élevée que le biais angulaire moyen acceptable de 177° (limite < ± 5°) et que les limites radiales de l'accord de 52° (limite < ± 30°) dans le diagramme polaire. La bronchoscopie réalisée lors de l'extubation et les entretiens avec les patient·es six heures après l'opération n'ont révélé aucune blessure grave liée à l'utilisation de la sonde trachéale de température. CONCLUSION: La sonde trachéale de température a montré un biais moyen global acceptable de −0,3 °C et un pourcentage d'erreur de 3 %, mais une capacité de tendance incompatible avec la sonde thermique Åsophagienne. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007265); 22 avril 2022.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Traqueia , Humanos , Temperatura , Temperatura Corporal , Intubação IntratraquealRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the association between phase angle (PA) and a composite adverse outcome in patients requiring off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: High-volume single center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 229 adult patients who underwent OPCAB from May 2019 to October 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Each patient underwent bioelectrical impedance analysis, including PA assessment before surgery (PApre), immediately postoperatively (PApost), and 1 day postoperatively (PAPOD1), using an Inbody S10. Frailty index and nutritional assessments also were obtained before surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient outcomes were assessed using a composite adverse outcome comprising death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, new-onset atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, stroke, postoperative pulmonary complications, wound complications, sepsis, reoperation, and/or delirium occurring during hospitalization and over the following year. Patients for whom composite adverse outcomes were reported had lower PApre than those without complications (5.4 ± 0.9 v 6.0 ± 0.9, p < 0.001). The PA was significantly associated with in-hospital and 1-year composite postoperative outcomes. The odds ratios (OR, [95% confidence interval]) for PApre by time were in-hospital complications (0.435 [0.314, 0.604], p < 0.001; 1-year complications: 0.459 [0.330, 0.638], p < 0.001) and PAPOD1 (OR, in-hospital complications: 0.400 [0.277, 0.576], 1-year complications: 0.429 [0.298, 0.619], p < 0.001). The PApre was significantly associated with days alive and out of hospital until 1 year. The cut-off value of PApre for optimal prediction of in-hospital complications was 6.0 (area under the curve: 0.691 [0.623-0.758], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Low PA as an indicator of frailty is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes after OPCAB. Low PA may be employed as a noninvasive and practical tool for the prediction of prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease.
Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Fragilidade , Humanos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Vasos Coronários , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , BiomarcadoresRESUMO
PURPOSE: Lung-recruitment maneuvers (LRM) have been shown to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery. This study aimed to investigate the association of LRM with the incidence of shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: A randomized controlled study was conducted with 110 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy from July 2022 to March 2023. Participants were randomized to receive either routine exsufflation or LRM at pneumoperitoneum release. The postoperative shoulder pain and abdominal pain were assessed at 1, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery using a numeric rating scale. Analgesic consumption and postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV) were evaluated during the first 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of shoulder pain during the first 24 h after surgery was significantly lower in the LRM group compared to the control group (26.9 vs. 59.3%; P = 0.001). The median [interquartile range] score of worst shoulder pain was significantly lower compared to the control group (3 [2-3] vs 4 [3-5.5]; P = 0.003). Participants in the LRM group showed reduced abdominal pain at rest at 4 and 24 h after surgery, and experienced significantly lower intensities of abdominal pain during mobilization at all time points over 24 h after surgery. There were no significant differences in opioid consumption or the incidence of PONV between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: LRM reduces both the incidence and intensity of shoulder pain during 24 h after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Additionally, LRM was associated with reduced intensity of abdominal pain during mobilization over the study period.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgery for gynecologic malignancy via midline-laparotomy leads to severe postoperative pain. Adequate pain control while sparing opioid consumption does offer benefits in postoperative complications and recovery. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) provides simple and effective analgesia. In this randomized trial, we compared postoperative opioid consumption in patients who received either ITM or a sham procedure. METHODS: We enrolled 68 adult patients undergoing open gynecologic oncology surgery from June 2021 to November 2021. They were randomly allocated to the ITM group (ITM; 200 µg injection) or sham group (sham procedure) to achieve a final 1:1 ratio between groups. We compared opioid consumption and pain severity during 72 hours after surgery. The variables regarding postoperative recovery and patient-centered outcomes were collected. The primary outcome is cumulative intravenous (IV) opioid consumption 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) cumulative IV opioid consumption during 24 hours after surgery was 18 mg (12-29) in the ITM group and 36 mg (27-42) in the sham group (median difference, 13; 95% confidence interval, 7.2-20.7; P < .001). Patient satisfaction regarding pain control was statistically significantly higher in the ITM group than in the sham group at postoperative 24 and 48 hours ( P < .001 and P = .005, respectively). There were no significant differences in the variables associated with postoperative recovery and frequency of complications requiring treatment. CONCLUSIONS: ITM is a safe and effective analgesic method after curative intent laparotomy for gynecologic malignancy. ITM provides better pain relief, reduces opioid consumption, and improves patient satisfaction without additional evident adverse events.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Morfina , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/tratamento farmacológico , Injeções Espinhais , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients are administered supplemental oxygen upon emergence from general anesthesia against the risk of hypoxia. However, few studies have assessed the weaning from supplemental oxygen therapy. This study investigated the frequency and risk factors of failure to discontinue supplemental oxygen at a postanesthesia care unit (PACU). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. We reviewed the medical records of adult patients admitted to the PACU after general anesthesia for elective surgery between January 2022 and November 2022. The primary endpoint was the frequency of failed weaning from supplemental oxygen therapy at PACU. A failed weaning was defined as oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 92% after discontinuing oxygen administration. The rate of failed discontinuation of supplemental oxygen at the PACU was assessed. Demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were explored to determine potential associations with failed weaning from supplemental oxygen therapy using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 12,109 patients. We identified 842 cases of failed weaning from supplemental oxygen therapy, with a frequency of 1:14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1:15-1:13). Risk factors that showed the strongest associations with failed weaning included postoperative hypothermia (odds ratio [OR], 5.42; 95% CI, 4.40-6.68; P < 0.001), major abdominal surgery (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 3.29-4.99; P < 0.001), and preoperative SpO2 < 92% in room air (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 2.09-4.64; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the analysis of more than 12,000 general anesthetics, an overall risk of failed weaning from supplemental oxygen therapy of 1:14 was observed. The identified risk factors may help determine the discontinuation of supplemental oxygen administration at PACU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
Assuntos
Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Anestesia Geral , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Desmame , Fatores de Risco , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Oxigênio/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A simulated education, prior to surgery about postoperative nasal stuffiness and ease of breathing through the mouth may help patients tolerate discomfort after nasal surgery. This study aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative simulated education on immediate postoperative opioid requirements in patients undergoing elective nasal surgery. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial of 110 patients undergoing nasal surgery randomly allocated patients into either a control (group C) or an education group (group E). One day before surgery, patients in group E were intensively trained to breathe through the mouth by using a nasal clip, with informative explanations about inevitable nasal obstruction and discomfort following surgery. Patients in group C were provided with routine preoperative information. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanil was used for anesthesia. No further opioid was used for analgesia intraoperatively. The primary outcome was index opioid (fentanyl) requirements at the post-anesthesia recovery unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes were emergence agitation, pain scores at the PACU, and postoperative recovery using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR15-K). RESULTS: The rate of opioid use in the PACU was 51.0% in the group E and 39.6% in the group C (p = 0.242). Additional request for analgesics other than index opioid was not different between the groups. Emergence agitation, postoperative pain severity, and QoR15-K scores were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: Preoperative education with simulated mouth breathing in patients undergoing nasal surgery did not reduce opioid requirements. TRIAL REGISTRATION: KCT0006264; 16/09/2021; Clinical Research Information Services ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ).
Assuntos
Delírio do Despertar , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Nasais , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Delírio do Despertar/tratamento farmacológico , Respiração Bucal/tratamento farmacológico , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Anestesia GeralRESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the association between the Oxygen Reserve index (ORi) and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) during one-lung ventilation in patients who underwent non-cardiac thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed the eligibility of 578 adult patients who underwent elective non-cardiac thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation at a tertiary hospital, and their electronic medical records were reviewed. The ORi monitor was used in all patients during anesthesia, and arterial blood gas analysis was routinely performed 15 min after the initiation of one-lung ventilation. The primary endpoint was the association between ORi and PaO2 which were measured simultaneously during one-lung ventilation. We also investigated the risk factors for PaO2 less than 150 mmHg during one-lung ventilation. RESULTS: Total of 554 patient were included in the analysis. The ORi value measured 15 min after the start of one-lung ventilation was significantly associated with PaO2 in the linear regression model (r2 = 0.5752, P < 0.001), and 0.27 of the ORi value could distinguish PaO2 ≥ 150 mmHg (sensitivity 0.909, specificity 0.932). Risk factors for PaO2 < 150 mmHg during one-lung ventilation included a lower ORi, older age, higher body mass index, left-sided one-lung ventilation, and lower hemoglobin concentrations. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that ORi could provide useful information on arterial oxygenation even during one-lung ventilation for non-cardiac thoracic surgery.
Assuntos
Ventilação Monopulmonar , Oxigênio , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pressão Parcial , GasometriaRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in major gynecologic surgery, expressed as cumulative opioid consumption 24 h after surgery. DESIGN: A single-center, patient-assessor blinded, randomized controlled study. SETTING: Samsung medical center (tertiary university hospital), between February 2022 to January 2023. PATIENTS: Eighty-eight females undergoing major surgery with long midline incision for gynecologic malignancy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard systemic analgesia (Control group) or ESPB (ESPB group). ESPB was performed bilaterally at the level of the 9th thoracic vertebra with a mixture of 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and 100 µg of epinephrine. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption and pain severity during the 72 h after surgery. The variables regarding postoperative recovery and patient-centered outcomes were compared. MAIN RESULTS: The mean cumulative opioid consumption 24 h after surgery was 35.8 mg in the ESPB group, which was not significantly different from 41.4 mg in the control group (mean difference, 5.5 mg; 95% CI -1.7 to 12.8 mg; P = 0.128). However, patient satisfaction regarding analgesia was significantly higher in the ESPB group compared with the control group at 24 h postoperative (median difference, -1; 95% CI -3 to 0; P = 0.038). There were no significant differences in the variables associated with postoperative recovery. CONCLUSION: ESPB did not reduce opioid consumption during the 24 h postoperative but attenuated pain intensity during the early period after surgery.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Bloqueio Nervoso , Humanos , Feminino , Analgésicos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Hospitais Universitários , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Ultrassonografia de IntervençãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) and continuous epidural infusion (CEI) for postoperative analgesia after elective cesarean section (CS). METHODS: Seventy-four women who underwent elective CS were randomized to receive either PIEB or CEI. The PIEB group received 4 ml-intermittent boluses of 0.11% ropivacaine every hour at a rate of 120 ml/h. The CEI group received a constant rate of 4 ml/h of 0.11% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the pain score at rest at 36 h after CS. Secondary outcomes included the pain scores during mobilization, time-weighted pain scores, the incidence of motor blockade, and complications-related epidural analgesia during 36 h after CS. RESULTS: The pain score at rest at 36 h after CS was significantly lower in the PIEB group compared with that in the CEI group (3.0 vs. 0.0; median difference: 2, 95% CI [1, 2], P < 0.001). The mean time-weighted pain scores at rest and during mobilizations were also significantly lower in the PIEB group than in the CEI group (pain at rest; mean difference [MD]: 37.5, 95% CI [24.6, 50.4], P < 0.001/pain during mobilization; MD: 56.6, 95% CI [39.8, 73.5], P < 0.001). The incidence of motor blockade was significantly reduced in the PIEB group compared with that in the CEI group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PIEB provides superior analgesia with less motor blockade than CEI in postpartum women after CS, without any apparent adverse events.
Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Anestésicos Locais , Cesárea , Dor Pós-Operatória , Humanos , Feminino , Cesárea/métodos , Adulto , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Gravidez , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Ropivacaina/administração & dosagem , Medição da Dor/métodos , Medição da Dor/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
Background: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been consistently associated with improved patient experience and surgical outcomes. Despite the release of ERAS Society guidelines specific to gynecologic oncology, the adoption of ERAS in gynecology on global level has been disappointingly low and some centers have shown minimal improvement in clinical outcomes after adopting ERAS. The aim of this study is to describe the development and early experience of ERAS protocols in gynecologic surgery at an urban academic tertiary medical center. Methods: This was an observational prospective cohort study. The target patient population included those with low comorbidities who were scheduled to undergo various types of gynecologic surgeries for both benign and malignant diseases between October 2020 and February 2021. Two attending surgeons implemented the protocols for their patients (ERAS cohort) while three attending surgeons maintained the conventional perioperative care for their patients (non-ERAS cohort). Baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes and patients' answers to a 12-question survey were compared. A case-matched comparative analysis was also performed between the ERAS cohort and the historical non-ERAS cohort (those who received the same types of surgical procedures from the two ERAS attending surgeons prior to the implementation of the protocols). Results: A total of 244 patients were evaluated (122 in the ERAS cohort vs. 122 in the non-ERAS cohort). The number of vials of opioid analgesia used during the first two postoperative days was significantly lower whereas the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen was more frequent in the ERAS cohort group. The patients in the ERAS group reported less postoperative pain, feelings of hunger and thirst, and greater amount of exercise postoperatively. These benefits of the ERAS cohort were more pronounced in the patients who underwent laparotomic surgeries than those who underwent laparoscopic surgeries. The case-matched comparative analysis also showed similar results. The length of hospital stay did not differ between those who underwent the ERAS protocols and those who did not. Conclusions: The results of the study demonstrated the safety, clinical feasibility and benefits of the ERAS protocols for patients undergoing gynecologic surgeries for both benign and malignant indications.
RESUMO
Many studies have reported that hypoalbuminemia could be associated with organ failure after liver transplantation. However, most of them focused on serum albumin levels measured at specific time points and not on the trend of serum albumin change. We investigated whether a cumulative postoperative change in serum albumin level up to postoperative day (POD) 5 is related to organ failure in patients who underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Data of adult recipients who underwent LDLT between January 2016 and December 2020 at a single tertiary hospital were reviewed (n = 399). After screening, three patients were excluded because of insufficient data. A cumulative change in serum albumin level was demonstrated using the area under the threshold (AUT, threshold = 3.0 g/dL) of the serum albumin curve up to POD 5. Based on the AUT, the patients were divided into a high-decrease group (n = 156) and a low-decrease group (n = 240). All analyses were conducted using 1:1 propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on POD 5. The secondary endpoints were postoperative hospital stay and postoperative 90-day mortality. A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). However, the length of postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.661) and 90-day mortality (P = 0.497) did not differ between the groups. In conclusion, a cumulative postoperative change in serum albumin level up to POD 5 could help predict postoperative organ failure on POD 5 in patients who underwent LDLT.
Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Adulto , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doadores Vivos , Estudos de Coortes , Albumina Sérica/análiseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety is an unpleasant experience that can adversely affect perioperative outcomes. Although clinical benefits of preoperative oral carbohydrate is well reported, the effect of adding chewing gum to carbohydrate loading has never been studied. We aimed to investigate the effect of adding gum-chewing to oral carbohydrates on preoperative anxiety and gastric volume in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. METHODS: One hundred and four patients were enrolled and randomized either into a carbohydrate drink group (CHD group) or CHD with gum group. The CHD group was instructed to drink 400 mL of oral carbohydrate the evening before and 200-400 mL 3 hours before surgery. The CHD with gum group was encouraged to chew gum freely during preanesthetic fasting in addition to consuming oral carbohydrates in the same manner. The primary endpoint was preoperative anxiety assessed using the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS). The degree of patient-reported quality of recovery after surgery and gastric volume prior to general anesthesia were also compared as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Preoperative APAIS was lower in the CHD with gum group compared with the CHD group (16 [11.5, 20] vs. 20 [16.5, 23], p = 0.008). Patient-rated quality of recovery after surgery was also higher in the CHD with gum group and showed a significant negative correlation with preoperative APAIS score (correlation coefficient: -0.950, p = 0.001). Gastric volume were not different between the groups (0 [0-0.45] vs. 0 [0-0.22], p = 0.158). CONCLUSION: The addition of gum chewing to oral carbohydrate loading during preoperative fasting was more effective in relieving preoperative anxiety than oral carbohydrate alone in women patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Services, CRIS identifier: KCT0005714, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp.
Assuntos
Carboidratos , Goma de Mascar , Humanos , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Estômago , Ansiedade , Cuidados Pré-OperatóriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety is a common problem in pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section. We aimed to determine the anxiolytic effects of chewing gum in pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Sixty-six women were randomly assigned to either the control group (n=33) or gum group (n=33) in a 1:1 ratio. In the gum group, the participants chewed xylitol gum for at least 10 min/h, regardless of fasting. Gum chewing was started at 5 pm a day before surgery and continued till the participant entered the operation room. In the control group, participants were requested to follow fasting guidelines without further instruction. The primary outcome was preoperative anxiety measured using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) immediately before surgery. RESULTS: The APAIS score immediately before surgery showed no significant difference between the control and the gum group (19.2±5.8 vs. 19.1±4.1, P>0.99). There were no statistically significant differences in the eight items related to anxiety: unfitness, concentration difficulty, hunger, thirst, dry mouth, fatigue, headache, and nausea. However, the pain score during the procedure of combined spinal epidural anesthesia was significantly lower in the chewing gum group [4 (IQR, 3-5.5)] than in the control group [5 (IQR, 3-7), P=0.045]. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative gum chewing did not reduce anxiety levels measured immediately before entering the operating room in the participants undergoing elective cesarean section. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of Korea: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp and identifier: KCT0006602; date of registration: September 27, 2021; principal investigator's name: RyungA Kang.
Assuntos
Cesárea , Goma de Mascar , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Motilidade Gastrointestinal , Ansiedade/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic liver resection is a minimally invasive surgical technique. However, a number of patients experience moderate-to-severe postoperative pain after laparoscopic liver resection. This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection will be randomly allocated to three groups (control, ESPB, or QLB) in a 1:1:1 ratio. In the control group, participants will receive systemic analgesia consisting of regular NSAIDs and fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) according to the institutional postoperative analgesia protocol. In the two experimental groups (ESPB or QLB group), the participants will receive preoperative bilateral ESPB or bilateral QLB in addition to systemic analgesia according to the institutional protocol. ESPB will be performed at the 8th thoracic vertebra level with ultrasound guidance before surgery. QLB will be performed in the supine position on the posterior plane of the quadratus lumborum with ultrasound guidance before surgery. The primary outcome is cumulative opioid consumption 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes are cumulative opioid consumption, pain severity, opioid-related adverse events, and block-related adverse events at predetermined time points (24, 48, and 72 h after surgery). Differences in plasma ropivacaine concentrations in the ESPB and QLB groups would be investigated, and the quality of postoperative recovery among the groups will be compared. DISCUSSION: This study will reveal the usefulness of ESPB and QLB in terms of postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection. Additionally, the study results will provide information on the analgesic superiority of ESPB versus QLB in the same population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered with the Clinical Research Information Service on August 3, 2022; KCT0007599.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Bloqueio Nervoso , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Fígado , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
Although previous studies reported that chewing gum during the preoperative fasting has the benefits of alleviating anxiety and dry mouth, preoperative chewing gum has yet to be accepted as a standard practice due to conventional anesthetic custom. Our study aimed to prospectively evaluate the effects of gum chewing on preoperative anxiety and patient's discomfort in female patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Ninety-four patients were enrolled and randomized either into conventional fasting group (control group) or chewing gum with fasting group (gum group). The control group was instructed to fast from 3 p.m. on the day before surgery. The gum group performed preoperative fasting in the same manner, but was encouraged to chew gum freely during the fasting period. The primary endpoint was the degree of preoperative anxiety. For the evaluation of preoperative anxiety, Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) was used. Preoperative gastric fluid volume and acidity were also measured as the secondary outcomes. Preoperative anxiety using APAIS was significantly lower in the gum group compared to the control group (control group vs. gum group: 20.9 vs. 17.8, p = 0.009). However, there was no significant difference in the gastric fluid analysis between the groups. In the female patients for elective gynecologic surgery, chewing gum during the preoperative fasting period helped to alleviate preoperative anxiety without additional increase of pulmonary aspiration risks.Trial registration: KCT0004422 (05/11/2019, https://cris.nih.go.kr ; registration number).
Assuntos
Ansiolíticos , Goma de Mascar , Jejum , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Humanos , Assistência Centrada no PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In our hospital, open living donor hepatectomy (OLDH) began in 1996 and laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy (LLDH) began in 2013. In this study, we focus on the change of anesthetic management from OLDH to LLDH. METHODOLOGY: Under the approval of the Institutional Review Board of our hospital, medical records of the last 2 years (2011 and 2012 vs 2019 and 2020) of each OLDH and LLDH era were collected. Left hepatectomy in any period and OLDH during the LLDH era were excluded. RESULTS: There were 175 OLDHs and 213 LLDHs. We performed 836 cases of OLDH before 2011 and 206 cases of LLDH before 2019. Laryngeal mask airway replaced intubation in half of LLDH cases. Erector spinae plane block was performed in a quarter of LLDH cases. Lung-protective ventilation with low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure were applied for LLDH. Additional peripheral venous line was decreased, and there was no central venous catheterization. Anesthesia duration time was reduced and crystalloid infusion per hour was also decreased. There was no intraoperative transfusion and there was no difference in postoperative transfusion incidence. Reoperation rate was not different. Only 1 donor in OLDH transferred to the intensive care unit after the operation because of uncontrolled hypertension. Length of hospital stay was decreased. CONCLUSIONS: As the surgical tactics for living liver donors become less invasive, the anesthetic strategy also becomes less invasive. In addition, new types of airway management, ventilation method, and analgesic technique have been introduced.
Assuntos
Anestésicos , Laparoscopia , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Hepatectomia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Curva de Aprendizado , Fígado/cirurgia , Doadores VivosRESUMO
Background: Open gastrectomy causes severe postoperative pain. Therefore, we investigated the opioid-sparing effect of the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) after open gastrectomy. Methods: Adult patients undergoing open gastrectomy were randomly assigned to either the ESPB group (ESPB + fentanyl based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia [IV-PCA]) or a control group (fentanyl based IV-PCA only). The primary outcome was total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were pain intensities using a numeric rating scale at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hour postoperatively, and the amount of fentanyl equivalent consumption during the PACU stay and at 3, 6, and 12 hour postoperatively, and the time to the first request for rescue analgesia. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour postoperatively between the two groups (P = 0.471). Pain intensities were not significantly different between the groups except during the PACU stay and 3 hour postoperatively (P < 0.001, for both). Time to the first rescue analgesia in the ward was longer in the ESPB group than the control group (P = 0.045). Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided ESPB did not decrease total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour after open gastrectomy. It only reduced postoperative pain intensity until 3 hour postoperatively compared with the control group. Ultrasound-guided single-shot ESPB cannot provide an efficient opioid-sparing effect after open gastrectomy.
RESUMO
Increased vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) is a reliable predictor of mortality and morbidity after cardiac surgery. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the association between VIS and adverse outcomes in adult patients after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). We included 2149 patients who underwent OPCAB. The maximal VIS was calculated for the initial 48 postoperative hours using standard formulae. The primary outcome was 1-year death. The composite adverse outcome was death, resuscitation or mechanical support, myocardial infarction, revascularization, new-onset atrial fibrillation, infection requiring antibacterial therapy, acute kidney injury, and stroke. Path-analysis was conducted using lactate and prognostic nutritional index (PNI). VIS was associated with 1-year death (odds ratio [OR] 1.07 [1.04-1.10], p < 0.001) and 1-year composite outcome (OR 1.02 [1.0-1.03], p = 0.008). In path-analysis, high VIS showed a direct effect on the increased risk of 1-year death and composite outcome. In the pathway using lactate as a mediating variable, VIS showed an indirect effect on the composite outcome but no significant effect on death. Low PNI directly affected the increased risk of 1-year death and composite outcome, and had an indirect effect on both outcomes, even when VIS was used as a mediating variable. In patients undergoing OPCAB, high VIS independently predicted morbidity and 1-year death. Patients with increased lactate levels following high VIS had an increased risk of postoperative complications, although not necessarily resulting in death. However, patients with poor preoperative nutritional status had an increased risk of unfavourable outcomes, including death, implying the importance of preoperative nutritional support.