Long-term results of combined liver-kidney transplantation for primary hyperoxaluria type 1: the French experience.

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a hepatic metabolic defect leading to end-stage renal failure. The posttransplant recurrence of kidney disease can suggest a need for combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT). However, the risk of LKT is theoretically far higher than the risk of kidney-alone transplantation (KAT). An unselected consecutive series of 54 patients with PH1 was analyzed according to the type of transplantation initially performed between May 1979 and June 2010 at 10 French centers. The duration of dialysis, extrarenal lesions, age, and follow-up were similar between the groups. Postoperative morbidity and mortality did not differ between the groups, and 10-year patient survival rates were similar for the LKT (n = 33) and KAT groups (n = 21; 78% versus 70%). Kidney graft survival at 10 years was better after LKT (87% versus 13%, P < .001) . Four patients (12.1%) lost their first kidney graft in the LKT group, whereas 19 (90%) did in the KAT group (P < .001). The recurrence of oxalosis occurred in 11 renal grafts (52%) in the KAT group but in none in the LKT group (P < .001). End-stage renal failure resulting from rejection was also higher in the KAT group (19% versus 9%, P < 0.0001). A second kidney transplant was performed for 15 patients (71%) in the KAT group versus 4 patients (12%) in the LKT group (P < 0.001). In conclusion, LKT for PH1 provides better kidney graft survival, less rejection, and similar long-term patient survival and is not associated with an increased short-term mortality risk. LKT must be the first-line treatment for PH1 patients with end-stage renal disease.

Conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors increases risk of de novo donor-specific antibodies.

In kidney transplantation, conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors may avoid calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity, but its impact on post-transplant allo-immunization remains largely unexplored. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the emergence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in kidney transplant recipients relative to their immunosuppressive therapy. Among 270 recipients without pretransplant immunization who were screened regularly for de novo DSA, 56 were converted to mTOR inhibitors after CNI withdrawal. DSA emergence was increased in patients who were converted to mTOR inhibitors (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.06-5.41, P = 0.036). DSA were mainly directed against donor HLA-DQB1 antigens. The presence of one or two DQ mismatches was a major risk factor for DQ DSA (HR 5.32; 95% CI 1.58-17.89 and HR 10.43; 95% CI 2.29-47.56, respectively; P < 0.01). Rejection episodes were more likely in patients converted to mTOR inhibitors, but this difference did not reach significance (16% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.185). Concerning graft function, no significant change was observed one year after conversion (P = 0.31). In conclusion, conversion to mTOR inhibitors may increase the risk of developing class II DSA, especially in the presence of DQ mismatches: this strategy may favor chronic antibody-mediated rejection and thus reduce graft survival.

Kidney and recipient weight incompatibility reduces long-term graft survival.

Long-term function of kidney allografts depends on multiple variables, one of which may be the compatibility in size between the graft and the recipient. Here, we assessed the long-term consequences of the ratio of the weight of the kidney to the weight of the recipient (KwRw ratio) in a multicenter cohort of 1189 patients who received a transplant between 1995 and 2006. The graft filtration rate increased by a mean of 5.74 ml/min between the third and sixth posttransplantation months among patients with a low KwRw ratio (<2.3 g/kg; P<0.0001). In this low KwRw ratio group, the graft filtration rate remained stable between 6 months and 7 years but then decreased at a mean rate of 3.17 ml/min per yr (P<0.0001). In addition, low KwRw ratios conferred greater risk for proteinuria, more antihypertensive drugs, and segmental or global glomerulosclerosis. Moreover, a KwRw ratio<2.3 g/kg associated with a 55% increased risk for transplant failure by 2 years of follow-up. In conclusion, incompatibility between graft and recipient weight is an independent predictor of long-term graft survival, suggesting that avoiding kidney and recipient weight incompatibility may improve late clinical outcome after kidney transplantation.

A clinical scoring system highly predictive of long-term kidney graft survival.

Determining early surrogate markers of long-term graft outcome is important for optimal medical management. In order to identify such markers, we used clinical information from a cross-validated French database (Données Informatisées et VAlidées en Transplantation) of 2169 kidney transplant recipients to construct a composite score 1 year after transplantation. This Kidney Transplant Failure Score took into account a series of eight accepted pre- and post-transplant risk factors of graft loss, and was subsequently evaluated for its ability to predict graft failure at 8 years. This algorithm outperformed the traditional surrogates of serum creatinine and the estimated graft filtration rate, with an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve of 0.78. Validation on an independent database of 317 graft recipients had the same predictive capacity. Our algorithm was also able to stratify patients into two groups according to their risk: a high-risk group of 81 patients with 25% graft failure and a low-risk group of 236 patients with an 8% failure rate. Thus, although this clinical composite score predicts long-term graft survival, it needs validation in different patient groups throughout the world.

Efficacy and safety of de novo or early everolimus with low cyclosporine in deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients at specified risk of delayed graft function: 12-month results of a randomized, multicenter trial.

Immediate or early use of proliferation signal inhibitor (PSI)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor therapy can avoid high exposure to calcineurin inhibitors but concerns exist relating to the risk of delayed graft function (DGF) and impaired wound healing with the mTOR sirolimus. CALLISTO was a 12-month, prospective, multicenter, open-label study. Deceased-donor kidney transplant patients at protocol-specified risk of DGF were randomized to start everolimus on day 1 (immediate everolimus, IE; n = 65) or week 5 (delayed everolimus, DE; n = 74). Incidence of the primary endpoint (biopsy-proven acute rejection, BPAR; graft loss, death, DGF, wound healing complications related to transplant surgery or loss to follow-up) was 64.6% and 66.2% in the IE and DE groups, respectively, at month 12 (P = 0.860). The overall incidence of BPAR was 20.1%. Median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 48 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and 49 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in the IE and DE groups, respectively, at month 12. DGF and wound healing complications were similar between groups. Adverse events led to study drug discontinuation in 17 IE patients (26.2%) and 28 DE patients (37.8%) (NS). In conclusion, introduction of everolimus immediately or early posttransplant in DGF-risk patients is associated with good efficacy, renal function and safety profile. There seems no benefit in delaying initiation of everolimus.

Daclizumab versus antithymocyte globulin in high-immunological-risk renal transplant recipients.

Nondepleting anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies (daclizumab) and depleting polyclonal antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) both prevent acute rejection, but these therapies have not been directly compared in a high-risk, HLA-sensitized renal transplant population. We randomly assigned 227 patients, who were about to receive a kidney graft from a deceased donor, to either Thymoglobulin or daclizumab if they met one of the following risk factors: current panel reactive antibodies (PRA) >30%; peak PRA >50%; loss of a first kidney graft from rejection within 2 yr of transplantation; or two or three previous grafts. Maintenance immunosuppression comprised tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Compared with the daclizumab group, patients treated with Thymoglobulin had a lower incidence of both biopsy-proven acute rejection (15.0% versus 27.2%; P = 0.016) and steroid-resistant rejection (2.7% versus 14.9%; P = 0.002) at one year. One-year graft and patient survival rates were similar between the two groups. In a comparison of rejectors and nonrejectors, overall graft survival was significantly higher in the rejection-free group (87.2% versus 75.0%; P = 0.037). In conclusion, among high-immunological-risk renal transplant recipients, Thymoglobulin is superior to daclizumab for the prevention of biopsy-proven acute rejection, but there is no significant benefit to one-year graft or patient survival.

[First acute rejection episode after renal transplantation: study of the histopathological characteristics according to the immunological risk]. / Premier épisode de rejet aigu après transplantation rénale: étude des caractéristiques histopathologiques en fonction du risque immunologique du patient.

Renal allograft biopsies (n=34) of two different populations of patients according to the immunological risk (high versus low-risk) have been compared retrospectively. The presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in peritubular capillaries was more frequent in the high-risk group. The C4d staining was positive in 10% of the low-risk patients and in 50% of the high-risk patients (P=0.03). There were more early graft loss, renal infarctions, interstitial hemorrhage, severe glomerulitis, neutrophilic glomerulitis and Banff III grade rejection in the positive C4d group. In conclusion, half of the immunized patients had a humoral rejection, patients with a C4d positive rejection had more early graft loss and more severe histological lesions.

Expectations and strategies regarding islet transplantation: metabolic data from the GRAGIL 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether islet transplantation should be aimed at restoring insulin independence or providing adequate metabolic control is still debated. The GRAGIL2 trial was designed as a phase 1-2 study where primary outcome was the rate of insulin independence, and secondary outcome was the success rate defined by a composite score based upon basal C-peptide, HbA1c, hypoglycemic events, and exogenous insulin needs. METHODS: C-peptide negative type 1 brittle diabetic patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia were eligible to receive a maximum of two islet preparations totalizing 10,000 IE/kg or more, with a threshold of 5,000 IE/kg for the first infusion, according to the Edmonton protocol, within the Swiss-French GRAGIL multicentric network. A sequential analysis with a triangular test was performed in every five patients after 6- and 12-month follow-up. Maximal inefficiency was set at 40% and minimal efficiency at 66%. RESULTS: From September 2003 to October 2005, 10 patients were included. Median waiting time was 6.7 months (first injection) and 9 weeks (second injection). All but one patient received 11,089+/-505 IE/kg: one received a single graft of 5398 IE/kg. At 6 months, insulin independence and composite success rates were 6 of 10 and 6 of 10, respectively. At 12 months, insulin independence was observed in 3 of 10 patients and success in 5 of 10 patients. CONCLUSION: Based upon our sequential analysis settings, islet transplantation failed to achieve the primary goal, insulin independence, but tended to succeed in reaching the secondary goal, successful metabolic control. Currently it appears to be a successful biological closed-loop glucose control method for brittle diabetes.

[Organ harvesting for transplantation: evaluation of the workload based on 390 procedures]. / Prélèvement d'organe en vue de la transplantation: evaluation de la charge de travail. A propos de 390 prélèvements.

INTRODUCTION: An increase in the number of organ harvesting procedures remains an essential prerequisite to meet the growing demands of patients on transplantation waiting lists. Few publications have described the workload related to this surgical activity and the human resources, equipment and organization involved. In the context of a review by public authorities of the needs for transplantation teams, the authors propose a qualitative and quantitative study of this activity as well as its impact on the functioning of a urology department. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From January 1997 to December 2005, the Grenoble hospital urology department performed 390 organ harvesting procedures for a network of 5 hospitals located in three departments. Arrival and departure times, duration and the type of each procedure were recorded. The surgical team was composed of 5 surgeons until November 2003, with the arrival of a sixth surgeon. RESULTS: During this period, 1,333 organs were harvested, including 775 kidneys. A typical organ harvesting procedure required the presence of the harvesting team from 8:15 p.m. to 1:45 a.m. and lasted a mean of 5 hours. It was performed outside of the teaching hospital within the network in 29.7% of cases, after hours in 96.9% of cases and required a mandatory rest period on the following day in 60% of cases. CONCLUSION: Organ harvesting is an essential surgical procedure, but it is urgent, frequent, long, and interferes with organization of the urology department. In the age of redefinition of public health objectives in transplantation and application of mandatory rest periods, surgical teams need to be reinforced in order to maintain a constant level of elective urological surgery.

Logistics and transplant coordination activity in the GRAGIL Swiss-French multicenter network of islet transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Since the Edmonton trial in 2000, increasing numbers of transplant centers have been implementing islet transplantation programs. Some institutions have elected to associate in multicenter networks, such as the Swiss-French GRAGIL (Groupe Rhin-Rhône-Alpes-Genève pour la Transplantation d'Ilots de Langerhans) consortium. METHODS: All pancreata offers to the University of Geneva Cell Isolation and Transplantation Center from within the network in 2002 and 2003 were reviewed. Islet preparations were attributed to the most suitable recipient on a centrally managed waiting list. All shipments were performed by ambulance in less than 5 hr. RESULTS: Over the period of study, 260 pancreata were offered, from a total of 1,304 cadaveric donors in the four allocation regions (20%). Fifty-two patients were on the waiting list at any time during this 2-year period. The percentage of organs offered varied in the range of 0.5% to 42%, depending on region of origin, with a correlation with number of patients on the waiting list in each region. Of these, 104 (40%) were accepted for processing. Ninety-two pancreata were actually processed, resulting in 42 islet preparations being transplanted. The number of international equivalents of transplanted preparations was 378,500+/-16,000 versus 165,400+/-15,400 (P<0.0001) for nontransplanted preparations. Total cold ischemia time was 6+/-0.3 hr for transplanted preparations versus 6.7+/-0.4 hr for nontransplanted preparations (not significant). CONCLUSIONS.: A high rate of pancreas offers, successful isolation, and islet transplantation can be achieved in multicenter networks such as GRAGIL. Such an approach can expand both the donor pool and the recipient population.

Ambulatory blood pressure variations relative to sitting or standing position in renal transplant patients.

OBJECTIVE: High blood pressure is almost constant in renal transplant patients for whom dysautonomia is frequently described. The main objective of this study was to analyse the variations in blood pressure and heart rate recorded by ambulatory measurement during changes in position in renal transplant patients. METHODS: Thirty-nine non-diabetic renal transplant patients with a renal transplant functioning for more than a year, were selected at random. Blood pressure was measured using the validated monitor Diasys Integra with a position sensor to discriminate between standing and sitting/lying. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure and heart rate were significantly higher when the patient was standing than when sitting/lying (+2.9 mmHg, P<0.05 and +9 beats/min, P<0.001 respectively) and diastolic blood pressure tends to be higher (+1.7 mmHg, NS) when standing. One minute after standing up, the heart rate rises by about 9 beats/min (P<0.001) while systolic and diastolic blood pressures do not vary significantly. Variations in systolic blood pressure and heart rate on changing position are therefore in the same direction as those recorded in elderly normotensive or hypertensive untreated subjects, but with a lower amplitude. CONCLUSIONS: In most of non-diabetic functional renal transplant patients, there is an absence of an orthostatic decline in blood pressure. Thus, it could be considered that there is no real dysautonomia in this specific population.

Cost analysis of human islet transplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes in the Swiss-French Consortium GRAGIL.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost of islet transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients with a functional renal graft in a multicenter network. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study involved nine diabetic patients transplanted in the Swiss-French Groupe Rhône-Alpes, Rhin et Geneve pour la transplantation d'Ilots Langerhans (GRAGIL) consortium between March 1999 and June 2000. The direct medical costs were estimated from Social Security's perspective from the inclusion of the patient to 1 year after transplantation. All cost components were computed separately and included evaluation, screening and candidacy, organ retrieval, islet processing, pancreas and islet transportation, hospitalization for transplantation, follow-up, medications (immunosuppressive, antidiabetic, and adjuvant drugs), and adverse events requiring hospitalization. RESULTS: During the study period, 56 pancreata were processed and 14 islet preparations were transplanted. The average cost of an islet transplantation (procedure and 1-year follow-up) was 77,745 euro (French rate, year 2000). The four main cost components were islet preparation (30% of the total cost), adverse events (24%), drugs (14%), and hospitalization (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall costs of islet transplantation are slightly higher than those of pancreas transplantation. The cell isolation process is a critical point; a reduction in overall cost will require more efficient ways of isolating high yields of viable islets. Costs generated by shipments within the GRAGIL network did not represent an economic burden. It can be expected that the costs will decrease with growing experience and improving technology.

Five-Year Metabolic, Functional, and Safety Results of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Transplanted With Allogenic Islets Within the Swiss-French GRAGIL Network.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the 5-year outcomes of islet transplantation within the Swiss-French GRAGIL Network. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all subjects enrolled in the GRAGIL-1c and GRAGIL-2 islet transplantation trials. Parameters related to metabolic control, graft function, and safety outcomes were studied. RESULTS: Forty-four patients received islet transplantation (islet transplantation alone [ITA] 24 patients [54.5%], islet after kidney [IAK] transplantation 20 patients [45.5%]) between September 2003 and April 2010. Recipients received a total islet mass of 9,715.75 ± 3,444.40 IEQ/kg. Thirty-four patients completed a 5-year follow-up, and 10 patients completed a 4-year follow-up. At 1, 4, and 5 years after islet transplantation, respectively, 83%, 67%, and 58% of the ITA recipients and 80%, 70%, and 60% of the IAK transplant recipients reached HbA1c under 7% (53 mmol/mol) and were free of severe hypoglycemia, while none of the ITA recipients and only 10% of the IAK transplant recipients met this composite criterion at the preinfusion stage. Thirty-three of 44 patients (75%) experienced insulin independence during the entire follow-up period, with a median duration of insulin independence of 19.25 months (interquartile range 2-58). Twenty-nine of 44 recipients (66%) exhibited at least one adverse event; 18 of 55 adverse events (33%) were possibly related to immunosuppression; and complications related to the islet infusion (n = 84) occurred in 10 recipients (11.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort with a 5-year follow-up and in a multicenter network setting, islet transplantation was safe and efficient in restoring good and lasting glycemic control and preventing severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Influence of islet transportation on pancreatic islet allotransplantation in type 1 diabetic patients within the Swiss-French GRAGIL network.

BACKGROUND: The influence of islet transportation on pancreatic islet allotransplantation in type 1 diabetic patients was evaluated within the GRAGIL network. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 2001 to April 2003, 16 human pancreatic islet transplants were performed in 9 type 1 diabetic patients with an established kidney graft (functioning for at least 6 months) in four centers of the GRAGIL network. Islet isolation was performed in a core laboratory in Geneva, and the islet preparations were shipped by ambulance to each center for transplantation. One month after transplantation, the efficiency of the graft was assessed according to islet transportation time (ITT): ITT less than 2 hours (group 1, n=5), and ITT greater than 4.5 hours (group 2, n=4, mediant 5 hours). RESULTS: Primary graft dysfunction was observed in one patient in group 1 after one month. Two patients became insulin independent in groups 1 and 2. All other patients in both groups had a plasma C-peptide level greater than 0.5 ng/ml. The HbA1c level and the exogenous insulin needs decreased in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: ITT does not seem to influence the efficiency of pancreatic islet allotransplantation in type 1 diabetic patients. These results emphasize the scope for multicenter networks such as the GRAGIL group.

[Pancreatic islet transplantation, results, techniques, perspectives and indications]. / La greffe d'îlots pancréatiques, résultats, techniques, perspectives et indications.

THE SITUATION: Islet transplantation stands as a promising curative treatment for type 1 diabetes. Improvements of this still experimental procedure were recently obtained through the modification of the immunosuppressive regimen and the increase of the islet mass delivered to the patient. Several centers have now reported rates of insulin-independence of 80% and beyond after one year, although these cohorts of patients are limited, and the results restricted to experienced centers. TECHNICAL ASPECTS: Islet isolation relies upon enzymatic digestion of the pancreas, transplantation is peformed through transhepatic portal vein catheterism, a strong steroid-free immunosuppression is needed. LIMITATIONS: Immune rejection and recurrence of diabetic autoimmunity are major obstacles, requiring a potentially harmful immunosuppression. Viability of pancreatic islets must be improved, since over 50% of cells are non specifically destroyed after their injection. The reproducibility of the islet isolation procedure is insufficient. The major question is the optimal source of tissue, as pancreas donors are scarce. INDICATIONS: Islet transplantation is now considered not only for patients needing immunosuppression for another transplantation (most often kidney), but also for patients with labile diabetes, recurrent life-threatening hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis, responsible for severe deterioration of the quality of life. CONCLUSION: In order to reduce the waiting lists of diabetic patients and to improve benefits/risks of the process, progress is required in the fields of organisational strategy, immunomodulation, and research on adult and embryonic stem cells.

Impact of anti-insulin antibodies on islet transplantation outcome: data from the GRAGIL Network.

BACKGROUND: In patients with type 1 diabetes, insulin antibodies (IA), altering the pharmacokinetics of circulating insulin, might be associated with high glucose concentration, prolonged hypoglycemia, and higher insulin requirement. The impact of IA on islet transplantation has never been explored. Our aim was to evaluate islet transplantation results at 1 year according to the presence of IA. METHODS: Our work is a retrospective, case-control study, comparing IA-negative and IA-positive patients among the cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes transplanted within the Swiss-French GRAGIL network between 2003 and 2010. RESULTS: Data about IA were available for 17 patients. Before islet transplantation, 10 patients (59%) were screened positive for IA. At 12 months after transplantation, IA-positive patients reached insulin independence less frequently than IA-negative patients (cumulative incidence of insulin independence, 22.2% vs. 71.4%; P=0.02); ß score was ≥7 in 43% of IA-negative patients versus 0% in IA-positive patients (P=0.022). When comparing IA-positive patients with IA-negative patients, insulin dose was 0.15 U/kg (0.10-0.18 U/kg) versus 0.01 U/kg (0-0.09 U/kg) (P=0.2); HbA1c was 6.1% (5.8%-6.3%) versus 6.1% (5.9%-6.8%) (P=0.16); basal C-peptide level was 460 ρmol/L (350-510 ρmol/L) versus 265 ρmol/L (177-405 ρmol/L) (P=0.28); occurrence of hypoglycemia was 12.5% versus 16.5% (P=0.9); and homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance was 1.25 (1-2.4) versus 0.7 (0.52-0.92) (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: After islet transplantation, IA-positive patients achieved insulin independence less frequently, exhibiting lower ß score and higher homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance compared with IA-negative patients. However, in both groups, islet transplantation restored good glycemic control and drastically reduced hypoglycemia and insulin requirements.

Profiling sirolimus-induced inflammatory syndrome: a prospective tricentric observational study.

BACKGROUND: The use of the immunosuppressant sirolimus in kidney transplantation has been made problematic by the frequent occurrence of various side effects, including paradoxical inflammatory manifestations, the pathophysiology of which has remained elusive. METHODS: 30 kidney transplant recipients that required a switch from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus-based immunosuppression, were prospectively followed for 3 months. Inflammatory symptoms were quantified by the patients using visual analogue scales and serum samples were collected before, 15, 30, and 90 days after the switch. RESULTS: 66% of patients reported at least 1 inflammatory symptom, cutaneo-mucosal manifestations being the most frequent. Inflammatory symptoms were characterized by their lability and stochastic nature, each patient exhibiting a unique clinical presentation. The biochemical profile was more uniform with a drop of hemoglobin and a concomitant rise of inflammatory acute phase proteins, which peaked in the serum 1 month after the switch. Analyzing the impact of sirolimus introduction on cytokine microenvironment, we observed an increase of IL6 and TNFα without compensation of the negative feedback loops dependent on IL10 and soluble TNF receptors. IL6 and TNFα changes correlated with the intensity of biochemical and clinical inflammatory manifestations in a linear regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus triggers a destabilization of the inflammatory cytokine balance in transplanted patients that promotes a paradoxical inflammatory response with mild stochastic clinical symptoms in the weeks following drug introduction. This pathophysiologic mechanism unifies the various individual inflammatory side effects recurrently reported with sirolimus suggesting that they should be considered as a single syndromic entity.

Predictive diagnostic of chronic allograft dysfunction using urinary proteomics analysis.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant Chronic Allograft Dysfunction (CAD), a major cause of long-term graft failure, is currently diagnosed at a late and irreversible stage by graft biopsies. Our goal was to identify predictive urinary biomarkers of CAD before renal lesions appeared by analysis of the urine proteomic profile. METHODS/METHODS: Twenty-nine urinary samples withdrawn three months post-transplant were analyzed by SELDI-TOF technology. CAD development was evaluated by serum creatinine level and confirmed by allograft biopsy one year after transplantation. Comparison of protein profile of both groups revealed 18 biomarkers predictive of CAD occurrence. RESULTS: The biomarker demonstrating the highest diagnostic performance was a protein of 8860 Da that predicted CAD with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 65%. Moreover combination of these biomarkers in two multivariate analyses improved the diagnostic potential of CAD. Relevance of these individual biomarkers and a decisional algorithm constituted of 3 proteins was confirmed in an independent cohort of patients with undetermined CAD status one year post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: These non invasive biomarkers, detected as soon as three months post-grafting, allowed identification of patients who would develop CAD as late as 4 years after graft. Systematic measurement of these biomarkers would greatly improve the management of immunosuppressive therapy of kidney grafted patients.

Impact of the number of infusions on 2-year results of islet-after-kidney transplantation in the GRAGIL network.

BACKGROUND: Insulin independence after islet transplantation is generally achieved after multiple infusions. However, single infusion would increase the number of recipients. Our aim was to evaluate the results of islet-after-kidney transplantation according to the number of infusions. METHODS: Islets were isolated at the Geneva University, shipped, and transplanted into French patients from the Swiss-French GRAGIL network, on the "Edmonton" immunosuppression protocol between 2004 and 2010. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were transplanted with 33 preparations. Fifteen patients reached 24 months follow-up; eight subjects were single-graft recipients and seven were double-graft recipients. Finally, single-graft recipients received a median of 5312 islet equivalents/kg (5186-6388) vs. 10,564 (10,054-11,375) for double-graft recipients (P=0.0003) with similar islet mass at first infusion. Insulin independence was achieved in five of eight single-graft subjects (62.5%) versus five of seven in double-graft subjects (71.4%), not significant. Median insulin independence duration was 4.7 (3.1-15.2) months after one infusion vs. 19 (9.6-20.8) months after two infusions (not significant). At 24 months posttransplant, comparing single- with double-graft patients, insulin doses were 0.23 (0.11-0.34) U/kg vs. 0.02 (0.0-0.23) U/kg, P=0.11; HbA1c was 6.5% (5.9%-6.8%) vs. 6.2% (5.9%-6.3%), P=0.16; and basal C-peptide was 302 (143-480) pmol/L vs. 599 (393-806) pmol/L, P=0.05. Only 37.5% of single-graft patients had a ß-score ≥4 compared with 100% of double-graft patients (P=0.03). Two recipients experienced postinfusion bleeding, and two patients (13%) showed renal dysfunction in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection. CONCLUSIONS: One infusion achieves good glycemic control and sometimes insulin independence. However, double-graft patients remain insulin-free longer, tend to have lower HbA1c, and show better graft function 24 months after transplant.