Real-Time Use of SGLT2i Verified in Pre-dialysis: The RSVP Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in nephrology practice is increasingly becoming standard of care in patients with diabetes or those with proteinuria. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome was to identify the proportion of pre-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) G3a, G3b, or G4 prescribed an SGLT2i and describe their characteristics. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicentric, cross-sectional study of patients with CKD followed at 4 pre-dialysis clinics in the province of Quebec, Canada. We collected data of multiple covariates associated with prescribing SGLT2i in patients over 18 years of age with CKD G3a, G3b, or G4. We then performed a multivariate logistic regression to assess their associations. RESULTS: Of the 874 patients included, 22.7% were prescribed an SGLT2i. Factors most strongly associated included male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 4.88, 95% CI = 2.38-10.03), being prescribed metformin (OR = 4.30, 95% CI = 2.23-8.31), having type 2 diabetes (OR = 4.00, 95% CI = 1.86-8.62), or having an albumin-to-creatinine ratio greater than 300 mg/g (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.08-3.14). The majority of patients (60.4%) had their SGLT2i initiated by the pre-dialysis clinic and the most frequent adverse event was an initial increase in serum creatinine 1 week after starting treatment (33.9%). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: An increasing number of patients with CKD are being prescribed SGLT2i. Nonetheless, significant disparities in sex, severity of disease, and comorbidities remain. We suggest that specific strategies be put in place to promote prescribing of SGLT2i in women and other at-risk populations, in particular among nephrology teams, to improve patient care.

Resources Assessment for Penicillin Allergy Testing Performed by Pharmacists at the Patient's Bedside.

BACKGROUND: False penicillin allergies lead to increased antimicrobial resistance, adverse effects, and health care costs by promoting the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends the implementation of allergy testing. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this research was to estimate the number of pharmacist full-time equivalents (FTEs) required for an intervention aimed at determining penicillin allergy in hospitalized patients. Acceptance of pharmacists' suggestions on antibiotic therapy are described. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in a 712-bed university hospital involving hospitalized patients with a suspected penicillin allergy and an infection treatable with penicillin. The time required for the intervention, which included a questionnaire, penicillin allergy testing (skin-prick test, intradermal injection, and oral provocation test), and recommendations on antibiotic therapy were measured to calculate the number of pharmacist FTEs. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were included. Scarification allergy testing was performed on 37, intradermal allergy test on 33, and oral provocation test on 26 patients. The intervention ruled out penicillin allergy in 26 patients, with no serious adverse effects. The intervention was associated with a median weekly pharmacist FTE of 0.15 (interquartile range = 0.12-0.25). The acceptance of pharmacists' suggestions was high and led to 9 patients being switched to an antibiotic with a narrower spectrum of activity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study describes penicillin allergy testing and the number of median weekly hospital pharmacist FTEs required, which was approximately 0.15. These data may aid in the implementation of this safe intervention that promotes narrower-spectrum antibiotherapy.

Monitoring and managing medication adherence in community pharmacies in Quebec, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists have direct access to prescription refill information and regularly interact with their patients. Therefore, they are in a unique position to promote optimal medication use. OBJECTIVES: To describe how community pharmacists in Quebec, Canada, identify nonadherent patients, monitor medication use and promote optimal medication adherence. METHODS: An invitation to complete a web-based survey was published online through different platforms, including a Facebook pharmacists' group, an electronic newsletter, a pharmacy network forum and e-mail. The survey included questions on participant characteristics, methods used by pharmacists to identify nonadherent patients and monitor medication use and interventions they used to promote medication adherence. RESULTS: In total, 342 community pharmacists completed the survey. The participants were mainly women (71.6%), staff pharmacists (56.7%) and aged 30 to 39 years (34.2%). The most common method to identify nonadherent patients was to check gaps between prescription refills (98.8%). The most common intervention to promote adherence was patient counselling (82.5%). The most common barriers to identifying nonadherent patients were lack of time (73.1%) and lack of prescription information (65.8%), whereas the most common barriers to intervening were anticipation of a negative reaction from their patients (91.2%) and lack of time (64%). CONCLUSION: Lack of time and lack of prescription information are frequent challenges encountered by community pharmacists regarding effective monitoring and management of patients with poor medication adherence. Pharmacists could benefit from electronic tools based on prescription refills that would provide quick and easily interpretable information on their patients' medication adherence. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2020;153:xx-xx.

The Quebec Respiratory Health Education Network: Integrating a model of self-management education in COPD primary care.

The objective of this study is to evaluate whether a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) self-management education program with coaching of a case manager improves patient-related outcomes and leads to practice changes in primary care. COPD patients from six family medicine clinics (FMCs) participated in a 1-year educational program offered by trained case managers who focused on treatment adherence, inhaler techniques, smoking cessation, and the use of an action plan for exacerbations. Health-care utilization, health-related quality of life (HRQL), treatment adherence, inhaler technique, and COPD knowledge were assessed at each visit with validated questionnaires. We also evaluated whether the use of spirometry and the assessment of individual patient needs led to a more COPD-targeted treatment by primary care physicians, based on changes in prescriptions for COPD (medication, immunization, and written action plan). Fifty-four patients completed the follow-up visits and were included in the analysis. The number of unscheduled physician visits went from 40 the year before intervention to 17 after 1 year of educational intervention ( p = 0.033). Emergency room visits went from five to two and hospitalizations from two to three (NS). Significant improvements were observed in HRQL ( p = 0.0001), treatment adherence ( p = 0.025), adequate inhaler technique ( p < 0.0001), and COPD knowledge ( p < 0.001). Primary care physicians increased their prescriptions for long-acting bronchodilators with/without inhaled corticosteroid, flu immunizations, and COPD action plans in the event patient had an exacerbation. The COPD self-management educational intervention in FMCs reduced unscheduled visits to the clinic and improved patients' quality of life, self-management skills, and knowledge. The program had a positive impact on COPD-related practices by primary care physicians in the FMCs.

Adherence and Persistence to Long-Acting Anticholinergics Treatment Episodes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

BACKGROUND: No studies have examined adherence or persistence to long-acting anticholinergics (LAAC) treatment episodes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVE: To estimate 1-year adherence and 5-year persistence to LAAC during treatment episodes, and the likelihood of initiating a subsequent treatment episode. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of LAAC-treated COPD patients was reconstructed from Quebec databases. A treatment episode was initiated at cohort entry, defined as the first LAAC prescription date on/after the first COPD diagnosis date recorded between October 1, 2003, and March 31, 2014. We identified a subsequent treatment episode up to 5 years after the end of the episode initiated at cohort entry. We measured adherence as the proportion of days covered over 1 year. Persistence was defined as prescription renewal within 90 days of the previous prescription and was plotted using Kaplan-Meier curves over 5 years. The 5-year hazard and cumulative incidence of initiating a subsequent episode were estimated with survival analyses. We compared adherence and persistence between the treatment episodes using t and log-rank tests. RESULTS: The cohort included 113 435 COPD patients. Adherence and persistence to LAAC were significantly lower in the subsequent treatment episode (55% vs 63%; P < 0.0001). The likelihood of initiating a subsequent episode was greatest immediately after the cessation of the initial episode, with 59% of patients starting a subsequent episode within 1 year. CONCLUSION: Adherence and persistence to LAAC were lower in the subsequent treatment episode. Interventions should be offered quickly after LAAC cessation.

Assessing adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma patients using an integrated measure based on primary and secondary adherence.

PURPOSE: There are very few studies on primary adherence (i.e., first filling of a prescription) to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthma patients; two have involved children. Moreover, adherence can be overestimated when considering only secondary adherence (i.e., following the medication recommendations for a defined period) and ignoring primary adherence. We aimed thus to evaluate the real-world primary and secondary adherence to ICS and to develop an integrated primary and secondary adherence (IPSA) measure. METHODS: From two clinical databases of pediatric and adult asthma patients, we included 198 children and 206 adults with one ICS prescription recorded in their medical chart between 2010 and 2012 and follow-up data for ≥12 months. Adherence was estimated from written prescriptions and prescription claims data. Primary adherence was defined as filling the ICS prescription at a pharmacy within 12 months. Secondary adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) in subjects who filled their prescription at least once. The IPSA was based on the PDC with a correction factor for primary adherence. RESULTS: Primary adherence to ICS at 12 months was 89.4 % in children and 69.4 % in adults. Secondary adherence at 12 months in children was 33.9 %, and the IPSA was 30.3 %. These values were 52.8 and 36.6 %, respectively, in adults. CONCLUSIONS: Primary adherence to ICS is low in adults and secondary adherence is poor in children and adults. Using the PDC as a unique measure of adherence led to significant overestimation in adults; IPSA leads to more valid estimates of adherence to ICS.

Predictors of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Utilization for Thromboembolism Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.

PURPOSE: Several factors have been associated with the prescription of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) over warfarin such as younger age, fewer concomitant medications, and lower CHADS2 or bleeding scores. The primary objective of this study was to identify predictors of DOAC choice compared with warfarin for patients who are starting a new oral anticoagulant (OAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF). The secondary objective was to describe the proportion of DOAC prescriptions in new users of OAC for AF. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a teaching hospital in Canada. Medical records of adult patients hospitalized in any medical units between October 1st, 2011 and October 1st, 2014, who were newly prescribed an OAC for non valvular AF were systematically reviewed. Baseline characteristics of warfarin and DOAC users were compared and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was completed to identify predictors of DOAC use. Variables included in the multiple regression analysis were: age, hypertension, diabetes, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, CHADS2 score of 2 or more, creatinine clearance 30mL/min or more, polypharmacy, concomitant use of ASA or clopidogrel, and prescription by a neurologist. RESULTS: Among OAC users (144 patients on DOAC and 295 patients on warfarin), older age (odds ratio [OR] 0.97; 95%CI 0.95-0.98), peripheral arterial disease (OR: O.41;95%CI: 0.21-0.82), polypharmacy (OR: 0.30;95%CI:0.10-0.89), and concomitant use of clopidogrel (OR: 0.19;95%CI:0.07-0.56) decreased the probability of DOAC use. Prescription by a neurologist (OR: 2.77;95%CI:1.34-5.76) and an estimated creatinine clearance of at least 30mL/min (OR: 3.53;95%CI:1.18-10.57) increased the likelihood of DOAC prescription. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first observational study finding that concomitant use of clopidogrel reduced the likelihood of DOAC utilization while prescription by a neurologist increased the probability of receiving a DOAC over warfarin in patients with AF.This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.

Predicting One-year Mortality After a "First" Hospitalization for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Eight-Variable Assessment Score Tool.

Several authors have studied predictors of outcomes following a hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, few have reported outcomes following a first hospitalization for COPD. The objective is to develop a predictive mortality risk model in patients surviving a first hospitalization for COPD. This is a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative and clinical data. The cohort included 1129 patients of 40-84 years, discharged alive from a hospitalization for COPD in a regional hospital (Sherbrooke, Canada) between 04/2006 and 03/2013 and to whom were prescribed at least two COPD drugs during their hospitalization. One-year mortality was analysed using logistic regression on a derivation sample and validated on a testing sample. In total, 141 (12.5%) patients died within one year from discharge of their first hospitalization for COPD. Predictors were: older age (OR (95% CI): 1.055 (1.026-1.085)), male sex (OR (95% CI): 1.474 (0.921-2.358)), having a severe COPD exacerbation (OR (95% CI): 2.548 (1.571-4.132)), higher hospital length of stay (OR (95% CI): 1.024 (0.996-1.053)), higher Charlson co-morbidity index (OR (95% CI): 1.262 (1.099-1.449)), being diagnosed of cancer (OR (95% CI): 2.928 (1.456-5.885)), the number of prior all-cause hospitalizations (OR (95% CI): 1.323 (1.097-1.595)), and a COPD duration exceeding 3 years (OR (95% CI): 1.710 (1.058-2.763)). A simple clinical prognosis tool is proposed and shows good discrimination in both the derivation and validation cohorts (c-statistic >0.78). One over eight patients discharged alive from a first COPD hospitalization will die the following year. It is thus important to identify higher-risk patients in order to plan and manage appropriate treatment.

Characterization of Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome: A Qualitative Analysis.

Approximately 15-20% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) also display characteristics of asthma. In May 2014, the asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) was briefly addressed in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy documents. We evaluated how pulmonologists diagnose and treat ACOS and how they assess its control. Pulmonologists from two university healthcare centers, having ≥ 1 year experience, treating patients with asthma, COPD, or ACOS, were invited to participate in focus groups. Two focus groups (1 hour duration) were convened with seven and five participants, respectively. According to pulmonologists from both institutions, ACOS is a new name for an existing syndrome rather than a new disease. It is characterized by incomplete reversible airflow limitations and changes in forced expiratory volume in one second over time. The pulmonologists noted that its diagnosis must be based on clinical characteristics, pulmonary function test results, and clinical intuition. To diagnose ACOS, pulmonologists must rely on their clinical judgment. They also agreed that the treatment of patients with ACOS should target the features of both asthma and COPD. Pulmonologists from both institutions used asthma control criteria to assess ACOS control. A deeper understanding would enable clinicians to establish specific criteria for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of subjects with ACOS.

Risk of congenital malformations for asthmatic pregnant women using a long-acting ß2-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid combination versus higher-dose inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for managing persistent asthma during pregnancy when low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are insufficient include adding a long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) or increasing the ICS dose. However, there are no data to help clinicians evaluate the safest regimen during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the risk of major congenital malformations in asthmatic women exposed to a LABA plus ICS combination and those exposed to ICS monotherapy at higher doses during the first trimester. METHODS: A cohort of asthmatic pregnant women exposed to ICSs during the first trimester who delivered between January 1990 and March 2009 was established. The primary outcome was major malformation recorded at birth or during the first year of life. Two subcohorts were established as follows: (1) users of a LABA plus low-dose ICS combination or users of a medium-dose ICS and (2) users of a LABA plus medium-dose ICS combination or users of a high-dose ICS. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare the risk of major malformations between the groups. RESULTS: In one subcohort there were 643 women who used a LABA plus low-dose ICS and 305 who used a medium-dose ICS; the other subcohort included 198 users of a LABA plus medium-dose ICS and 156 users of a high-dose ICS. The prevalence of major malformations was 6.9% and 7.2%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for major malformations was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.6-1.9) when a LABA plus low-dose ICS was used compared with a medium-dose ICS and 1.2 (95% CI, 0.5-2.7) when a LABA plus medium-dose ICS was used compared with a high-dose ICS. CONCLUSION: The risk of major malformations was similar with a LABA plus ICS combination and ICS monotherapy at higher doses, suggesting that both therapeutic options can be considered during pregnancy.

Asthma exacerbations during the first trimester of pregnancy and congenital malformations: revisiting the association in a large representative cohort.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported an increased prevalence of any congenital malformation among women experiencing moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbations during the first trimester of pregnancy, based on a study in which 90.1% of the cohort of women were social welfare recipients. This study re-examined the association between asthma exacerbations and congenital malformations in a new large representative cohort of asthmatic pregnant women. METHODS: A cohort of 36 587 pregnancies in asthmatic women was reconstructed from Québec Province administrative databases (1998-2009). Occurrences of asthma exacerbations during the first trimester of pregnancy were assessed and categorised into severe, moderate and no such exacerbations. For comparison, we also considered moderate and severe asthma exacerbations combined. Congenital malformations were identified using diagnoses recorded in the hospitalisation database. Generalised estimation equations were used to estimate adjusted ORs of congenital malformations. RESULTS: The prevalence of any congenital malformation was 19.1%, 11.7% and 12.0% among women with severe, moderate and no such exacerbations during the first trimester, respectively. The adjusted OR for all malformations was 1.64 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.64) when women with severe exacerbations were compared with those in the reference group, while no association was seen for moderate exacerbations. Also, no association was observed between cases of moderate and severe asthma exacerbations combined and any congenital malformation. CONCLUSIONS: Only severe asthma exacerbations were found to significantly increase the risk of congenital malformations in this representative study. Previous studies possibly overestimated the risk because they were based mainly on women at a lower socioeconomic status.

Is drug insurance status an effect modifier in epidemiologic database studies? The case of maternal asthma and major congenital malformations.

BACKGROUND: Our previous work on the association between maternal asthma and congenital malformations was based on cohorts formed by women with public drug insurance, i.e., over-represented by women with lower socioeconomic status, questioning the generalizability of our findings. This study aimed to evaluate whether or not drug insurance status, as a proxy of socioeconomic status, is an effect modifier for the association between maternal asthma and major congenital malformations. METHODS: A cohort of 36,587 pregnancies from asthmatic women and 198,935 pregnancies from nonasthmatic women selected independently of their drug insurance status was reconstructed with Québec administrative databases (1998-2009). Asthmatic women were identified using a validated case definition of asthma. Cases of major congenital malformations were identified using diagnostic codes recorded in the hospitalization database. Drug insurance status at the beginning of pregnancy was classified into three groups: publicly insured with social welfare, publicly insured without social welfare, and privately insured. Adjusted odds ratios were estimated with generalized estimation equations, including an interaction term between maternal asthma and drug insurance status. RESULTS: The prevalence of congenital malformations was 6.8% among asthmatic women and 5.8% among nonasthmatics. The impact of asthma on the prevalence of congenital malformations was significantly greater in women publicly insured with social welfare (odds ratio = 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.61) than in the other two groups ([odds ratio = 1.10; 1.00-1.21] in the publicly insured without social welfare and [odds ratio = 1.13; 1.07-1.20] in the privately insured group). CONCLUSION: The increased risk of major congenital malformation associated with asthma was significantly higher among pregnant women publicly insured with social welfare than among those privately insured. As a result of this effect modification by drug insurance status, findings from Québec observational studies using databases mainly formed of patients publicly insured with social welfare may not be generalized to the entire population.

Relative perinatal safety of salmeterol vs formoterol and fluticasone vs budesonide use during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Recent asthma guidelines endorse the safety of long-acting ß2-agonists (LABAs) and of mild and moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) when required to control asthma during pregnancy, yet do not state a preferred medication within each class. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the relative perinatal safety with the use of salmeterol and formoterol (LABAs) and that of fluticasone and budesonide (ICSs) during pregnancy. METHODS: A subcohort of pregnancies from asthmatic women was selected from health care administrative databases of Quebec, Canada. Low birth weight (LBW) was defined as weight less than 2,500 g, preterm birth (PB) as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, and small for gestational age (SGA) as a birth weight below the 10th percentile. The effect of treatment with salmeterol vs formoterol and fluticasone vs budesonide on the outcomes was determined with generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: The LABA and ICS subcohorts were composed of 547 (385 salmeterol and 162 formoterol users) and 3,798 (3,190 fluticasone and 608 budesonide users) pregnancies, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed for LBW (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.88), PB (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.56-2.23), and SGA (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.67-2.02) newborns between women exposed to salmeterol vs formoterol or between women exposed to fluticasone vs budesonide (LBW: OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76-1.52; PB: OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.78-1.49; and SGA, OR: 1.10; 95% CI, 0.85-1.44). CONCLUSION: This study does not provide evidence of greater perinatal safety for one LABA or one ICS over the other.

Impact of maternal use of asthma-controller therapy on perinatal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Asthma during pregnancy usually requires treatment with controller medications about which more safety information is needed. The objectives are to assess the impact of the use of long-acting ß2-agonists (LABAs) and the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) during pregnancy on the prevalence of low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth (PB) and small for gestational age (SGA). METHODS: A cohort of women with asthma giving birth from 1998 to 2008 was constructed from Québec (Canada) administrative databases. LBW was defined as weight <2500 g, PB as delivery before 37 weeks' gestation and SGA as a birth weight below the 10th percentile. The impact of the use of LABAs and the dose of ICSs during pregnancy on the outcomes was determined with generalised-estimating-equation models. RESULTS: The cohort included 7376 pregnancies: 8.8% exposed to LABAs and 56.9% exposed to ICSs. All LABA users also received ICSs. The prevalence of LBW, PB and SGA was 7.7%, 9.5% and 13.5%, respectively. LABA use was not found to be associated with increased prevalence of LBW (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.12), PB (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.15) or SGA (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.70 to 1.20). Mean ICSs doses >125 µg/day (fluticasone-equivalent) were associated with a non-significant trend of increased LBW, PB and SGA. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the possibility of residual confounding due to uncontrolled or more severe asthma or smoking status, the use of LABA and low to moderate doses of ICSs were not associated with increased prevalence of perinatal outcomes. Additional research on higher ICSs doses is required to better evaluate their safety during pregnancy.

Does hospitalization influence patients' medication adherence and community pharmacists' interventions?

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence reduces disease morbidity. Data regarding changes in a patient's adherence before and after hospitalization and how this hospitalization influences a pharmacist's interventions are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in adherence to cardiovascular and respiratory medications in the year preceding and following a hospitalization; explore patients' perceptions about medication adherence and the pharmacist's role; and describe pharmacists' interventions regarding medication adherence. METHODS: This cohort study included patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome, acute worsening of heart failure, or acute COPD exacerbations. Adherence to cardiovascular and respiratory medications was measured by calculating the proportion of days covered (PDC) from prescription refills. Patient interviews were completed to explore their perceptions about medication adherence and the role of the pharmacist. Community pharmacists were invited to complete an online survey and to participate in focus groups to discuss interventions to improve medication adherence. RESULTS: Medication adherence was assessed for 61 patients; the mean PDC was 69.8% 12 months before hospitalization and 72.4% 12 months following hospitalization. Patients reported that they felt the need to take their medications to prevent worsening of their disease. They were satisfied with current pharmaceutical services. A total of 136 questionnaires completed by pharmacists were analyzed and 9 participants attended the focus groups. Most pharmacists reported monitoring prescription renewals to assess adherence, with no significant influence from the hospitalization itself. The patient's interest was reported to be an important facilitator, whereas a lack of time and face-to-face interaction with patients who had their medication delivered to their home was reported a main barrier to interventions. This study was limited by a small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Patient medication adherence did not significantly change following hospitalization. Hospitalization does not appear to significantly influence patient and pharmacist behavior towards medication adherence.

2023 Canadian Thoracic Society Guideline on Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Stable COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient care must include confirming a diagnosis with postbronchodilator spirometry. Because of the clinical heterogeneity and the reality that airflow obstruction assessed by spirometry only partially reflects disease severity, a thorough clinical evaluation of the patient should include assessment of symptom burden and risk of exacerbations that permits the implementation of evidence-informed pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. This guideline provides recommendations from a comprehensive systematic review with a meta-analysis and expert-informed clinical remarks to optimize maintenance pharmacologic therapy for individuals with stable COPD, and a revised and practical treatment pathway based on new evidence since the 2019 update of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) Guideline. The key clinical questions were developed using the Patients/Population (P), Intervention(s) (I), Comparison/Comparator (C), and Outcome (O) model for three questions that focuses on the outcomes of symptoms (dyspnea)/health status, acute exacerbations, and mortality. The evidence from this systematic review and meta-analysis leads to the recommendation that all symptomatic patients with spirometry-confirmed COPD should receive long-acting bronchodilator maintenance therapy. Those with moderate to severe dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council ≥ 2) and/or impaired health status (COPD Assessment Test ≥ 10) and a low risk of exacerbations should receive combination therapy with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting ẞ2-agonist (LAMA/LABA). For those with a moderate/severe dyspnea and/or impaired health status and a high risk of exacerbations should be prescribed triple combination therapy (LAMA/LABA/inhaled corticosteroids) azithromycin, roflumilast or N-acetylcysteine is recommended for specific populations; a recommendation against the use of theophylline, maintenance systemic oral corticosteroids such as prednisone and inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy is made for all COPD patients.

Impact of maternal asthma on perinatal outcomes: a two-stage sampling cohort study.

There are conflicting results concerning the impact of maternal asthma during pregnancy on perinatal outcomes. The present study investigated the associations between maternal asthma during pregnancy and the risk of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant, a low-birth-weight (LBW) infant, and preterm birth. A population-based cohort of 40,788 pregnancies from asthmatic and non-asthmatic women was reconstructed through the linking of three Quebec (Canada) administrative databases between 1990 and 2002. A two-stage sampling cohort design was used to collect additional information by way of a mailed questionnaire. The generalized estimation equation models were used to obtain adjusted odds ratios of SGA, LBW and preterm birth comparing asthmatic and non-asthmatic women. The cohort included 13,007 pregnancies from asthmatic and 27,781 pregnancies from non-asthmatic women. Final estimates showed that the odds of SGA (odds ratio: 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.14, 1.41), LBW (1.41: 1.22, 1.63) and preterm delivery (1.64: 1.46, 1.83) were significantly higher among asthmatic than non-asthmatic women. Mothers with asthma during pregnancy are more likely to have SGA, LBW, or preterm birth infants than non-asthmatic women. These results can be more easily generalized to women with lower socio-economic status since the cohort under represents women with high socio-economic status.