[The International Study of Burnout Syndrome among Psychiatric Trainees (BoSS International) : Findings from Statistical Analysis of the Japanese Data (BoSS Japan)].

BACKGROUND: Burnout is a psychological condition that may occur after being exposed to excessive and prolonged work-related stresses. Previous studies have demonstrated that the rate of burnout among physicians may be higher compared to other occupations ; and espe- cially psychiatric trainees would have a higher risk of burnout because of limited clinical expe- rience, the burden of heavy duties and longer work-hours etc. In this study, we report the findings from Japanese data obtained as part of the international study of burnout syndrome among psychiatric trainees (BoSS International). METHODS: This study was initiated by members of the European Federation of Psychiatric Trainees (EFPT) and the European Psychiatric Association-European Early Career Psychia- trists (EPA-EECP). The total number of participating nations was 22 countries. A national coordinator recruited study collaborators all over Japan and psychiatric trainees working at their medical institutes were invited to participate in BoSS International by e-mail. The sub- jects were requested to answer the on-line questionnaire anonymously. Consent was obtained when making a list of potential participants at each institute and reconfirmed on the first page of the on-line questionnaire. Answering the questionnaire was deemed to constitute consent. RESULTS: Total number of participants to BoSS International was 7,525 from 22 countries and regions. Of them, 1,980 psychiatric trainees fully completed answering the questionnaire (response rate (RR) 26.0%) including 95 Japanese trainees (RR 41.5%). The mean age of 95 Japanese psychiatric trainees (male rate 67.4%) enrolled in BoSS International was 31.8?4.8 year-old. Their mean clinical experience was 2.9 ?4.4 years. The mean weekly working hours were 72.3?27.1, which was the longest of the 22 participating countries/regions ; while weekly clinical supervision by a mentor was only 3.8?9.0 hours. Regarding the severity of burnout, assessed by using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS) consisting of three factors (emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and low sense of professional efficacy): 41 Japanese psychiatric trainees (42.0%) meet the criteria of severe burnout syndrome in this study ; with emotional exhaustion scores of 2.20 and higher, and cynicism of 2.00 and higher. Signifi- cant differences were found on the PHQ-9 score and mean length of supervision between those participants with presence and absence of severe burnout syndrome by using Student's t-test. CONCLUSION: Statistical analyses of the whole data (n=1,980) revealed that the risk of burnout was higher for trainees who were younger, without children, and had not opted for psychiatry as a first career choice. Further analyses after adjustment for socio-demographic characteristics and country difference still demonstrated severe burnout was associated with long working hours, less supervision, and not having regular rest. The analyses of Japanese data showed similar tendencies, although statistical significance was not observed. Burnout among psychiatry trainees may be linked to drop-out from the training program and malprac- tice in clinical settings. We should be aware of the higher risk of burnout in residents and the importance of regular and sufficient supervision to prevent burnout.

Clinician treatment choices for post-traumatic stress disorder: ambassadors survey of psychiatrists in 39 European countries.

BACKGROUND: Considering the recently growing number of potentially traumatic events in Europe, the European Psychiatric Association undertook a study to investigate clinicians' treatment choices for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHODS: The case-based analysis included 611 participants, who correctly classified the vignette as a case of PTSD, from Central/ Eastern Europe (CEE) (n = 279), Southern Europe (SE) (n = 92), Northern Europe (NE) (n = 92), and Western Europe (WE) (N = 148). RESULTS: About 82% woulduse antidepressants (sertraline being the most preferred one). Benzodiazepines and antipsychotics were significantly more frequently recommended by participants from CEE (33 and 4%, respectively), compared to participants from NE (11 and 0%) and SE (9% and 3%). About 52% of clinicians recommended trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy and 35% psychoeducation, irrespective of their origin. In the latent class analysis, we identified four distinct "profiles" of clinicians. In Class 1 (N = 367), psychiatrists would less often recommend any antidepressants. In Class 2 (N = 51), clinicians would recommend trazodone and prolonged exposure therapy. In Class 3 (N = 65), they propose mirtazapine and eye movement desensitization reprocessing therapy. In Class 4 (N = 128), clinicians propose different types of medications and cognitive processing therapy. About 50.1% of participants in each region stated they do not adhere to recognized treatment guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians' decisions for PTSD are broadly similar among European psychiatrists, but regional differences suggest the need for more dialogue and education to harmonize practice across Europe and promote the use of guidelines.

Improving mental health care in depression: A call for action.

Depressive disorders have one of the highest disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of all medical conditions, which led the European Psychiatric Association to propose a policy paper, pinpointing their unmet health care and research needs. The first part focuses on what can be currently done to improve the care of patients with depression, and then discuss future trends for research and healthcare. Through the narration of clinical cases, the different points are illustrated. The necessary political framework is formulated, to implement such changes to fundamentally improve psychiatric care. The group of European Psychiatrist Association (EPA) experts insist on the need for (1) increased awareness of mental illness in primary care settings, (2) the development of novel (biological) markers, (3) the rapid implementation of machine learning (supporting diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics), (4) the generalized use of electronic devices and apps into everyday treatment, (5) the development of the new generation of treatment options, such as plasticity-promoting agents, and (6) the importance of comprehensive recovery approach. At a political level, the group also proposed four priorities, the need to (1) increase the use of open science, (2) implement reasonable data protection laws, (3) establish ethical electronic health records, and (4) enable better healthcare research and saving resources.

Joint European policy on the COVID-19 risks for people with mental disorders: An umbrella review and evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for mental and public health.

As COVID-19 becomes endemic, identifying vulnerable population groups for severe infection outcomes and defining rapid and effective preventive and therapeutic strategies remains a public health priority. We performed an umbrella review, including comprehensive studies (meta-analyses and systematic reviews) investigating COVID-19 risk for infection, hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality in people with psychiatric disorders, and outlined evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for overcoming potential barriers that psychiatric patients may experience in preventing and managing COVID-19, and defining optimal therapeutic options and current research priorities in psychiatry. We searched Web of Science, PubMed, and Ovid/PsycINFO databases up to 17 January 2022 for the umbrella review. We synthesized evidence, extracting when available pooled odd ratio estimates for the categories "any mental disorder" and "severe mental disorders." The quality of each study was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 approach and ranking evidence quality. We identified four systematic review/meta-analysis combinations, one meta-analysis, and three systematic reviews, each including up to 28 original studies. Although we rated the quality of studies from moderate to low and the evidence ranged from highly suggestive to non-significant, we found consistent evidence that people with mental illness are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and most importantly mortality, but not of ICU admission. The risk and the burden of COVID-19 in people with mental disorders, in particular those with severe mental illness, can no longer be ignored but demands urgent targeted and persistent action. Twenty-two recommendations are proposed to facilitate this process.

Clinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countries.

BACKGROUND: While shared clinical decision-making (SDM) is the preferred approach to decision-making in mental health care, its implementation in everyday clinical practice is still insufficient. The European Psychiatric Association undertook a study aiming to gather data on the clinical decision-making style preferences of psychiatrists working in Europe. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey involving a sample of 751 psychiatrists and psychiatry specialist trainees from 38 European countries in 2021, using the Clinical Decision-Making Style - Staff questionnaire and a set of questions regarding clinicians' expertise, training, and practice. RESULTS: SDM was the preferred decision-making style across all European regions ([central and eastern Europe, CEE], northern and western Europe [NWE], and southern Europe [SE]), with an average of 73% of clinical decisions being rated as SDM. However, we found significant differences in non-SDM decision-making styles: participants working in NWE countries more often prefer shared and active decision-making styles rather than passive styles when compared to other European regions, especially to the CEE. Additionally, psychiatry specialist trainees (compared to psychiatrists), those working mainly with outpatients (compared to those working mainly with inpatients) and those working in community mental health services/public services (compared to mixed and private settings) have a significantly lower preference for passive decision-making style. CONCLUSIONS: The preferences for SDM styles among European psychiatrists are generally similar. However, the identified differences in the preferences for non-SDM styles across the regions call for more dialogue and educational efforts to harmonize practice across Europe.

Changes of neurocognitive status in patients with the first-episode psychosis after 18 months of treatment-A prospective cohort study.

Neurocognitive symptoms exert the most influence on treatment outcomes over the course of schizophrenia, starting from the first-episode of psychosis (FEP) onwards. Our aim was to analyze the neurocognitive status of FEP compared to healthy controls (HC), and its change after 18 months of treatment. We performed a study in a sample of 159 patients with FEP and 100 HC. We followed the patients up for 18 months after initial assessment with a battery of neurocognitive tests. We observed statistically significant improvement in the majority of neurocognitive tests after 18 months, but several tests of specific neurocognitive domains (verbal memory, language functions, executive functions) did not show significant differences between the two assessments. The results for the majority of tests obtained from patients with FEP after 18 months of treatment showed significant deterioration compared with HC. Although our study showed significant improvement of baseline neurocognitive deficits in FEP with treatment, this varied across domains and overall performance remained below that of HC. Thus, while it seems that treatment of FEP may help to delay or restore neurocognitive deterioration, it is unclear whether specific areas of neurocognitive deterioration (e.g. verbal domain) would benefit from more time or specific treatment approaches.

Mental health services during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: Results from the EPA Ambassadors Survey and implications for clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused an unprecedented worldwide crisis affecting several sectors, including health, social care, economy and society at large. The World Health Organisation has emphasized that mental health care should be considered as one of the core sectors within the overall COVID-19 health response. By March 2020, recommendations for the organization of mental health services across Europe have been developed by several national and international mental health professional associations. METHODS: The European Psychiatric Association (EPA) surveyed a large European sample of psychiatrists, namely the "EPA Ambassadors", on their clinical experience of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment of psychiatric patients during the month of April 2020 in order to: a) identify and report the views and experiences of European psychiatrists; and b) represent and share these results with mental health policy makers at European level. Based on the recommendations issued by national psychiatric associations and on the results of our survey, we identified important organisational aspects of mental health care during the peak of the first wave of the COVID-19. RESULTS: While most of the recommendations followed the same principles, significant differences between countries emerged in service delivery, mainly relating to referrals to outpatients and for inpatient admission, assessments and treatment for people with mental disorders. Compared to previous months, the mean number of patients treated by psychiatrists in outpatient settings halved in April 2020. In the same period, the number of mentally ill patients tested for, or developing, COVID-19 was low. In most of countries, traditional face-to-face visits were replaced by online remote consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings we recommend: 1) to implement professional guidelines into practice and harmonize psychiatric clinical practice across Europe; 2) to monitor the treatment outcomes of patients with COVID-19 and pre-existing mental disorders; 3) to keep psychiatric services active by using all available options (for example telepsychiatry); 4) to increase communication and cooperation between different health care providers.

Are female psychiatry residents better to propose in emergency a voluntary hospitalization?

This study analyses assessment, intervention and admission decisions made by emergency psychiatry residents, to determine whether these differ depending on the gender of the resident. Data from all patients presenting to a psychiatric emergency room were collected prospectively for a 3 months period as part of a local quality check project. A questionnaire was used to collect patient demographic data, diagnosis, treatment decisions and the personal and professional characteristics of the residents who performed the assessments. During the 3 months of the study period we obtained data on all 251 emergency assessments carried out by all six residents working in the service. These were 3 female and 3 male 3rd year residents in psychiatry. There was no difference between male and female residents concerning ICD-10 diagnostic assessment, adherence to local hospitalization criteria guidelines, psychotherapeutical and pharmacological treatments administered. A similar distribution between male and female residents was found for diagnoses. No difference was found in the rate of hospitalization decisions between male and female residents. However, surprisingly, there were more voluntary hospitalizations by the women residents (P = 0.035; χ2 = 4.443) and more involuntary admissions by the men residents (P = 0.005; χ2 = 7.643). There was no correlation between the gender of the patient and the assessment or hospitalization decision of either male or female residents. Although this study has methodological limitations, it suggests that female emergency psychiatry residents are more likely to propose voluntary hospitalizations.

Depression and suicidality among psychiatric residents - results from a multi-country study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have highlighted risks for depression and suicide in medical cohorts, but evidence regarding psychiatric residents is missing. This study aimed to determine rates of depression, suicide ideation and suicide attempt among psychiatric residents and to identify associated individual, educational and work-related risk factors. METHODS: A total of 1980 residents from 22 countries completed the online survey which collected data on depression (PHQ-9), suicidality (SIBQ), socio-demographic profiles, training, and education. Generalized linear modeling and logistic regression analysis were used to predict depression and suicide ideation, respectively. RESULTS: The vast majority of residents did not report depression, suicide ideation or attempting suicide during psychiatric training. Approximately 15% (n = 280) of residents met criteria for depression, 12.3% (n = 225) reported active suicide ideation, and 0.7% (n = 12) attempted suicide during the training. Long working hours and no clinical supervision were associated with depression, while more completed years of training and lack of other postgraduate education (e.g. PhD or psychotherapy training) were associated with increased risk for suicide ideation during psychiatric training. Being single and female was associated with worse mental health during training. LIMITATIONS: Due to the cross-sectional nature of the study, results should be confirmed by longitudinal studies. Response rate was variable but the outcome variables did not statistically significantly differ between countries with response rates of more or less than 50%. CONCLUSION: Depression rates among psychiatric residents in this study were lower than previously reported data, while suicide ideation rates were similar to previous reports. Poor working and training conditions were associated with worse outcomes. Training programmes should include effective help for residents experiencing mental health problems so that they could progress through their career to the benefit of their patients and wider society.

Suicidal ideation and burnout among psychiatric trainees in Japan.

AIM: Burnout is a psychological condition that may occur in all workers after being exposed to excessive work-related stresses. We investigated suicidal ideation and burnout among Japanese psychiatric trainees as a part of the Burnout Syndrome Study (BoSS) International. METHODS: In the Japanese branch, 91 trainees fully completed suicide ideation and behaviour questionnaire (SIBQ) and Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS). RESULTS: Passive suicidal ideation was reported by 38.5% of Japanese trainees and 22.0% of them had experienced active suicidal ideation. The burnout rate among Japanese subjects was 40.0%. These results were worse compared to the all 1980 trainees who fully completed the main outcome measure in BoSS International, 25.9%, 20.4% and 36.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a higher risk of suicide among Japanese residents. Japan has a higher suicide rate than other countries. Early detection of, and appropriate intervention for, suicidal ideation is important in preventing suicide in psychiatry residents.

A proposed new definition of mental health. / Propozycja nowej definicji zdrowia psychicznego.

The authors propose a new approach to the definition of mental health, different than the definition proposed by the World Health Organization, which is established around issues of person's well-being and productivity. It is supposed to reflect the complexity of human life experience.

[Suicidal Behavior among Portuguese Psychiatry Trainees: Comparison with the European Situation]. / Comportamento Suicidário nos Internos de Psiquiatria em Portugal: Comparação com a Realidade Europeia.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper was to assess the prevalence of suicide ideation and attempts in Portuguese psychiatry trainees (adult and child and adolescence), and compare the data with the general population and other European countries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A structured and anonymous questionnaire was sent by email to 159 portuguese trainees of adult psychiatry and child and adolescence psychiatry with questions about personal history of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, as well as family history of suicide attempts and completed suicides. This is part of the BoSS Study (Burnout Syndrome Study) performed in 21 countries worldwide. Data was analysed in SPSS v.19. RESULTS: From the inquired population, 62 trainees (40,3%) partially responded, and 46 (29%) were complete responders - these entered the final analysis. There was a ratio of 2:1 (female:male) and a mean age of 29 years. The suicidal ideation was present in passive form in 44% and in active form in 33%; also, 4.3% of respondents had previous suicide attempts. In first degree relatives, 22% had attempted suicide and 13% completed suicide. DISCUSSION: The results are worriying and may be associated with some factors to which this population is exposed. CONCLUSION: It is necessary further research to better understand this phenomenon, its causes and potential modifiers.

Introdução: O objectivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a prevalência de ideação suicida e tentativas de suicídio nos médicos internos de psiquiatria de adultos e de psiquiatria da infância e da adolescência em Portugal, e comparar os resultados com a população geral portuguesa e de outros países europeus. Material e Métodos: Enviou-se um questionário estruturado e anónimo, por e-mail, aos 159 internos de psiquiatria de adultos e de psiquiatria da infância e da adolescência do país, questionando antecedentes pessoais de ideação suicida e tentativas de suícidio, bem como antecedentes familiares de tentativas de suicídio falhadas e consumadas. Estas questões fazem parte do Estudo BoSS (Burnout Syndrome Study) realizado em 21 países. A análise dos dados foi feita através do programa informático SPSS v. 19. Resultados: Responderam parcialmente ao questionário 62 internos (40,3%) e 46 (29%) responderam ao questionário na totalidade, constituindo assim a amostra. O ratio feminino:masculino foi de 2:1 e a média de idade de 29 anos. A ideação suicida estava presente na forma passiva em 44% dos inquiridos e na forma activa em 33%; 4,3% referiu tentativas de suicídio prévias. Em relação à história familiar, registou-se 22% de tentativas de suicídio e 13% de suicídio consumado.Discussão: Os resultados obtidos são preocupantes e podem estar associados a factores específicos a que esta população está exposta. Conclusão:ã necessária uma investigação mais aprofundada para se compreender melhor este fenómeno, respectivas causas e potenciais modificadores.

Twelve years old: the European Federation of Psychiatric Trainees (EFPT).

The European Federation of Psychiatric Trainees (EFPT) is an independent federation of national trainee associations; it represents over 12 000 trainees in 19 member countries across Europe. It is run by an annually elected board, comprising the President, Secretary-General, Treasurer, President elect and past President, and is governed by a written constitution.