Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Tohoku J Exp Med ; 261(3): 179-185, 2023 Nov 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37635061

RESUMO

The pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a high mortality rate and poses a significant threat to the population. The disease may progress with mild symptoms or may cause the need for intensive care, depending on many factors. In this study, it was aimed to determine if there is a tendency due to genetic factors in COVID-19 patients. Ninety-four of 188 patients with mild clinical and 94 with severe clinical symptoms were included in the study. The targeted panel including coagulopathy (F2, F5), viral invasion (ACE2), and inflammation (CXCL8, IFNAR2, IFNL4, IL10, IL2, IL6, IRF7, TLR3, TLR7, TNF) related genes was performed sequenced by the next generation sequencing (NGS). The variants found were classified and univariate analyses were performed to select candidate variables for logistic model. Risk factors and variants were compared. It was revealed that the presence of 2 or more risk factors caused the disease to progress severely (p < 0.001). Heterozygous IRF7:c.1357-23dup variant had a 2.5 times higher risk for mild disease compared to severe disease. Other variants were found to be more significant in mild disease. Since polymorphic variants were not evaluated in the literature, the findings of our study could not be compared with the literature. However, as variants that may be effective in the severity of infections may differ according to ethnicity. This study has the feature of being a guide for subsequent studies to be carried out especially in Turkish population. Clinical course of the COVID-19 is likely to depend on a variety of risk factors, including age, sex, clinical status, immunology and genetic factors.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Inflamação/genética , Fatores de Risco , Interleucinas
2.
Turk J Med Sci ; 53(5): 1194-1204, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38813031

RESUMO

Background/aim: The clinical presentation of pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a milder disease course than the adult COVID-19 syndrome. The disease course of COVID-19 has three clinicobiological phases: initiation, propagation, and complication. This study aimed to assess the pathobiological alterations affecting the distinct clinical courses of COVID-19 in pediatric age groups versus the adult population. We hypothesized that critical biogenomic marker expressions drive the mild clinical presentations of pediatric COVID-19. Materials and methods: Blood samples were obtained from 72 patients with COVID-19 hospitalized at Ankara City Hospital between March and July 2021. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated using Ficoll-Paque and density-gradient sedimentation. The groups were compared using a t-test and limma analyses. Mean standardized gene expression levels were used to hierarchically cluster genes employing Euclidean Gene Cluster 3.0. The expression levels of identified genes were determined using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Results: This study found that ANPEP gene expression was significantly downregulated in the pediatric group (p < 0.05, FC: 1.57) and IGF2R gene expression was significantly upregulated in the adult group (p < 0.05, FC: 2.98). The study results indicated that the expression of critical biogenomic markers, such as the first-phase (ACE2 and ANPEP) and second-phase (EGFR and IGF2R) receptor genes, was crucial in the genesis of mild clinical presentations of pediatric COVID-19. ANPEP gene expression was lower in pediatric COVID-19. Conclusion: The interrelationship between the ANPEP and ACE2 genes may prevent the progression of COVID-19 from initiation to the propagating phase in pediatric patients. High IGF2R gene expression could potentially contribute to a protective effect and may be a contributing factor for the mild clinical course observed in pediatric patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/genética , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Etários
3.
Infection ; 50(3): 747-752, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34984646

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Vaccination is the most efficient way to control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but vaccination rates remain below the target level in most countries. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the vaccination status of hospitalized patients and compare two different booster vaccine protocols. SETTING: Inoculation in Turkey began in mid-January 2021. Sinovac was the only available vaccine until April 2021, when BioNTech was added. At the beginning of July 2021, the government offered a third booster dose to healthcare workers and people aged > 50 years who had received the two doses of Sinovac. Of the participants who received a booster, most chose BioNTech as the third dose. METHODS: We collected data from 25 hospitals in 16 cities. Patients hospitalized between August 1 and 10, 2021, were included and categorized into eight groups according to their vaccination status. RESULTS: We identified 1401 patients, of which 529 (37.7%) were admitted to intensive care units. Nearly half (47.8%) of the patients were not vaccinated, and those with two doses of Sinovac formed the second largest group (32.9%). Hospitalizations were lower in the group which received 2 doses of Sinovac and a booster dose of BioNTech than in the group which received 3 doses of Sinovac. CONCLUSION: Effective vaccinations decreased COVID-19-related hospitalizations. The efficacy after two doses of Sinovac may decrease over time; however, it may be enhanced by adding a booster dose. Moreover, unvaccinated patients may be persuaded to undergo vaccination.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
4.
Acta Clin Croat ; 61(4): 655-660, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37868181

RESUMO

In our study, we examined the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the incidence of pneumothorax in intensive care patients over age 65. COVID-19 intensive care patients that presented to our department between April 2020 and May 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two main groups, i.e., before and after the vaccination period. Patients were evaluated retrospectively for the following parameters: gender, age, side of pneumothorax, mortality, discharge, comorbidity, and additional pleural complications. The total number of patients was 87, i.e., 66 patients before vaccination and 21 patients after vaccination. When patients in the pre- and post-vaccination period were compared, there was a significant difference in the incidence of pneumothorax between the two groups (p<0.05). Pneumothorax was less common after vaccination. When patients with pneumothorax and tube thoracostomy were evaluated according to pre- and post-vaccination mortality, mortality was significantly higher (89%) in the pre-vaccination period (p<0.05). We consider that COVID-19 vaccines used in patients aged over 65 reduced the incidence of pleural complications, especially pneumothorax. We think that mortality due to pneumothorax in patients over 65 years of age was lower during the vaccination period. In addition, we think that bilateral pneumothorax was more common in the non-vaccinated period. As a result, we think that life-threatening pneumothorax and similar complications could be reduced by increasing the number of vaccines made in the COVID-19 pandemic and spreading it around the world.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Pneumotórax , Idoso , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/complicações , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pandemias , Pneumotórax/epidemiologia , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Toracostomia/efeitos adversos
5.
Transplant Proc ; 54(6): 1569-1571, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34887098

RESUMO

The vaccines developed against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are seen as the most crucial weapon in controlling the epidemic. It has been reported in early-stage vaccine studies that vaccines provide up to 95% protection against severe disease and mortality, even in the absence of symptomatic infection. Reports on vaccine breakthrough infections that developed after widespread vaccination are available in the literature. In addition to the general population, the course of vaccine breakthrough infections in immunocompromised patients is a matter of concern. This case report aimed to define severe coronavirus disease 2019 developing in a lung recipient who received 3 doses of inactivated virus vaccine.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coronavírus Relacionado à Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave , Vacinas Virais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Pulmão , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim ; 46(4): 276-282, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30140534

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In this study, our aim was to investigate the efficacy and sufficiency of bispectral indeks (BIS) guided remifentanil-desflurane anaesthesia on intraoperative haemodynamic stability in both normotensive and hypertensive patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: Thirty adult, ASA I-III patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary surgery were included in the study. According to the presence of essential hypertension preoperatively, patients were divided into two groups. Haemodynamic parameters were recorded at 11 time points during the operation. RESULTS: There were no differences in the demographic data, heart rate and intraoperative and postoperative parameters between the groups. Arterial blood pressure and additional requirement of remifentanil were found to be significantly higher in the hypertensive group intraoperatively. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing off-pump coronary revascularisation surgery, intraoperative haemodynamic stabilisation with remifentanil-desflurane anaesthesia under BIS guidance was safely provided, but higher remifentanil doses were required in hypertensive patients.

7.
Biomed Res Int ; 2015: 658678, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25918718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to compare HTEA and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery (CABG), based on haemodynamic parameters and myocardial functions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 34 patients that were scheduled for elective CABG, who were randomly divided into 2 groups. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with total intravenous anesthesia in both groups while intravenous PCA with morphine was administered in Group 1 and infusion of levobupivacaine was administered from the beginning of the anesthesia in Group 2 by thoracic epidural catheter. Blood samples were obtained presurgically, at 6 and 24 hours after surgery for troponin I, creatinine kinase-MB (CK-MB), total antioxidant capacity, and malondialdehyde. Postoperative pain was evaluated every 4 hours until 24 hours via VAS. RESULTS: There were significant differences in troponin I or CK-MB values between the groups at postsurgery 6 h and 24 h. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure in Group 1 were significantly higher than in Group 2 at all measurements. Cardiac index in Group 2 was significantly higher than in Group 1 at all measurements. CONCLUSION: Patients that underwent CABG and received HTEA had better myocardial function and perioperative haemodynamic parameters than those who did not receive HTEA.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Bupivacaína/análogos & derivados , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Idoso , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Levobupivacaína , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Manejo da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA