Common Salt versus Silver Nitrate for the Treatment of Umbilical Granuloma in Infants: An Open-label, Single-center, Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Aim: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of topical application of common salt (CS) in comparison to silver nitrate (SN) for treating infants with umbilical granuloma (UG). Materials and Methods: We conducted an open-label, prospective, single-center, pilot randomized controlled trial. Thirty-seven infants with a clinical UG diagnosis were enrolled between October 2022 and July 2023, excluding those previously treated for UG. Patients were randomly assigned (using the Randomizer® app) to receive either topical CS (applied thrice daily by caregivers at home for 5 days) or SN (applied by pediatric surgeon in clinic and kept under occlusive dressing for 48 h). Patients with partial/no healing received an additional session of the same treatment. Nonresponders transitioned from CS to SN, and vice versa, for two more applications. Healing rates were compared with a significance level of α =0.05. Results: Out of 34 patients (18 CS and 16 SN), 32 successfully completed the trial (17 CS and 15 SN). No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics. Efficacy rates of CS (19/22; 86.36%) and SN (11/17; 64.71%) did not significantly differ (P = 0.056; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.4832-0.0502). No major adverse events were reported. CS showed superior healing outcomes in infants below 3 months of age (19/22; 86.36%) compared to SN (11/17; 64.71%) (P = 0.056; 95% CI - 0.4832-0.0502). The timing of umbilical cord detachment did not significantly affect healing rates. Conclusion: Widespread availability, ease of access, suitability for safe home application, and cost-effectiveness make CS a primary treatment option for UG. Larger patient cohorts are needed for conclusive results.

A Pilot Survey of Indian Stakeholders: Parents, Doctors, and Grown-Up Patients of Disorders of Sexual Differentiation on Management Decisions and Associated Gender Dysphoria.

Background and Aims: Of late, there are many legal representations from select quarters to halt all medical interventions in children with differences of sex development (DSD). In this survey on management decisions in DSD, we distil the views of Indian stakeholders: parents, physicians, and grown-up patients with DSD on their management decisions to identify decisional satisfaction or gender dysphoria. Methods: The survey domains included the patient demographics, final diagnosis, decision on the sex of rearing, surgical interventions, opinion of the stakeholders on the preferred age of sex assignment, final sex of rearing, and agreement/disagreement about sex assignment (gender dysphoria). Results: A total of 106 responses were recorded (66% parents, 34% grown-up patients aged 12-50 years). Among parents, 65/70 (95%) preferred the sex to be assigned soon after birth. All grown-up patients preferred sex to be assigned soon after birth. Regarding decisions on surgery, 74% of physicians and 75% of the grown-up patients felt parents should be allowed to decide interventions. Among Indian parents, 90% felt they should have the right to decide surgery in the best interest of their child for a safe social upbringing. Overall, gender dysphoria among Indian DSD patients was <1% (1/103, 0.97%). Conclusions: The predominant preference and opinion of major Indian stakeholders (physicians, parents, and grown-up DSD patients) support the existing approach toward DSD management, including early sex assignment and necessary medical intervention.