Weak antibody response to three doses of mRNA vaccine in kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept.

Poor responses to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine have been reported after 2 vaccine injections in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) treated with belatacept. We analyzed the humoral response in belatacept-treated KTRs without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection who received three injections of BNT162b2-mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. We also investigated vaccine immunogenicity in belatacept-treated KTRs with prior COVID-19 and characterized symptomatic COVID-19 infections after the vaccine in belatacept-treated KTRs. Among the 62 belatacept-treated KTRs (36 [58%] males), the median age (63.5 years IQR [51-72]), without COVID-19 history, only four patients (6.4%) developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG with low antibody titers (median 209, IQR [20-409] AU/ml). 71% were treated with mycophenolic acid and 100% with steroids in association with belatacept. In contrast, in all the 5 KTRs with prior COVID-19 history, mRNA vaccine induced a strong antibody response with high antibody titers (median 10 769 AU/ml, IQR [6410-20 069]) after two injections. Seroprevalence after three-vaccine doses in 35 non-belatacept-treated KTRs was 37.1%. Twelve KTRs developed symptomatic COVID-19 after vaccination, including severe forms (50% of mortality). Breakthrough COVID-19 occurred in 5% of fully vaccinated patients. Administration of a third dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine did not improve immunogenicity in KTRs treated with belatacept without prior COVID-19. Other strategies aiming to improve patient protection are needed.

Baseline graft status is a critical predictor of kidney graft failure after diarrhoea.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhoea is one of the most frequent complications after kidney transplantation (KT). Non-infectious diarrhoea has been associated with reduced graft survival in kidney transplant recipients. However, the risk factors for renal allograft loss following diarrhoea remain largely unknown. METHODS: Between January 2010 and August 2011, 195 consecutive KT recipients who underwent standardized microbiological workups for diarrhoea at a single centre were enrolled in this retrospective study. RESULTS: An enteric pathogen was readily identified in 91 patients (47%), while extensive microbiological investigations failed to find any pathogen in the other 104. Norovirus was the leading cause of diarrhoea in these patients, accounting for 30% of the total diarrhoea episodes. The baseline characteristics were remarkably similar between non-infectious and infectious diarrhoea patients, with the exception that the non-infectious group had significantly lower graft function before diarrhoea (P = 0.039). Infectious diarrhoea was associated with a longer duration of symptoms (P = 0.001) and higher rates of acute kidney injury (P = 0.029) and hospitalization (P < 0.001) than non-infectious diarrhoea. However, the non-infectious group had lower death-censored graft survival than the infectious group (Gehan-Wilcoxon test, P = 0.038). Multivariate analysis retained three independent predictors of graft failure after diarrhoea: diarrhoea occurring ≥5 years after KT [hazard ratio (HR) 4.82; P < 0.001], re-transplantation (HR 2.38; P = 0.001) and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 11.02; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that pre-existing conditions (re-transplantation, chronic graft dysfunction and late occurrence) determine the primary functional long-term consequences of post-transplant diarrhoea.

Clinical and immunological features of very long-term survivors with a single renal transplant.

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and immunological features of the 56 still alive patients at our institution harboring a functional first renal transplant since more than 30 years. The mean post-transplant graft survival in all patients was 35.4 ± 3.1 years, the mean serum creatinine concentration was 128.7 ± 7 µmol/l, and the mean urinary protein concentration was 0.6 ± 0.5 g/l. Fifty-one percent of the patients had experienced cancer involving the skin (46.1%) and/or other tissues (28%). Hepatocarcinoma was diagnosed in 11% of the patients with chronic viral hepatitis B and/or C (48%). The 5-year patient survival rate (considered after the 30th transplantation anniversary) was 27% in patients presenting a tumor versus 87% in those tumor-free (P < 0.0001). The thymic output, the proportions of the memory and naïve T cell subsets, and the frequencies of EBV- and CMV-reactive, IFN-γ-producing T cells did not differ from those observed in more recently transplanted patients. These results suggest that the impact of chronic immunosuppression on some immune functions does not worsen over time and that the observed high prevalence of cancer in these patients may be related to the synergistic effects of decreased immunosurveillance and the time required for carcinogenesis.

[Renal transplantation: Procedure and early follow-up]. / Transplantation rénale : réalisation et suivi précoce.

More than fifty years after the success of the two first renal transplantations in Boston and in Necker hospital in Paris, renal transplantation became the treatment of choice of end stage renal failure, because it improves not only the quality of life of the patients but also their long-term survival. In France, more than 3,700 kidney transplantations are performed every year and more than 40,000 patients are living with a functioning kidney allograft. This treatment of end stage renal disease requires a fine-tuned pre-transplant evaluation and a multidisciplinary post-transplant care in order to prevent, to detect and to treat comorbidities and complications of immunosuppression. The ambition of this manuscript is not to describe in an exhaustive way all the aspects of renal transplantation but starting from the experience of a team, recently published data, and national and international guidelines, to try to provide a synthetic and chronological view of the early post-transplant monitoring.

Hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation: a prospective randomized trial to evaluate 3 strategies in patients at risk of bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: In this clinical trial, we aimed to compare three means of performing chronic hemodialysis in patients with contra-indication to systemic heparinization. METHODS: This open-label monocentric randomized « n-of-one ¼ trial, conducted in a single tertiary care center, recruited chronic hemodialysis patients with a contra-indication to systemic heparinization for at least 3 consecutive sessions. All patients underwent hemodialysis with an AN69ST dialyzer, and were administered three alternative dialysis procedures in a random sequence: intermittent saline flushes, constant saline infusion, or pre-dialysis heparin coating of the membrane. The primary outcome was the need to interrupt the dialysis session because of clotting events due to either (i) a complete coagulation of the circuit; (ii) a partial coagulation of the circuit; (iii) a>50% rise over baseline in the venous pressure. RESULTS: At the end of the inclusion period (May, 2007 to December, 2008), the number of patients to include (n=75) was not reached: only 46 patients were included and underwent randomization. The study was terminated, and statistical analysis took into account 224 hemodialysis sessions performed in 44 patients with analyzable data. Heparin adsorption was associated with a significant reduction of the need to interrupt the dialysis session because of clotting events: odds ratio 0.3 (CI 95% 0.2 to 0.6; p<0.001, versus intermittent saline flushes). Heparin adsorption was also associated with higher odds for performing >3 h dialysis sessions and for having complete blood restitution. There were no significant effects of the dialysis procedure on weight loss, online ionic dialysance, and adverse events. CONCLUSION: Heparin-coated AN69ST dialysis membrane is a safe and effective method to avoid or delay per-dialytic clotting events in patients with contra-indication to systemic anticoagulation. However, results are not generalizable safely to patients with active bleeding, since weak heparinemia, not assessed in this study, may occur. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00473109.

[Current aspects of acute humoral rejection]. / Aspects actuels des rejets aigus humoraux.

Acute clinical antibody-mediated rejection is currently defined by (1), an acute renal failure occurring during the first months following transplantation, (2), at least a microcirculation inflammation (glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis) on kidney biopsy and (3), the presence in peripheral blood of donor specific antibodies, mostly anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. The prognosis of this rejection is scored using the severity of vascular lesions and the positivity of C4d on peritubular capillaries. Recently, a subclinical variety of antibody-mediated rejection was recognized as an entity because, as the clinical rejection, it leads to chronic antibody-mediated rejection, currently the most frequent cause of graft loss. The description of these various aspects of antibody-mediated rejection allowed a better understanding of its pathophyiology that may lead in a near future to a more specific treatment.

Home and office blood pressure monitoring in renal transplant recipients.

Background. Arterial hypertension in renal transplant recipients (RTR) is associated with increased morbid mortality. In the general population, home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) was found to be superior to office blood pressure (OBP) in identifying true hypertensive patients. The aim of this study was to investigate HBPM for the assessment of blood pressure profile in RTR. Methodology and Principal Findings. We included prospectively 87 stable RTR. Sitting OBP was measured during the outpatient clinic. HBPM was performed by measuring BP every morning and night for 4 days. The accepted limits for the OBP and HBPM, were respectively, 140/90 mmHg and 135/85 mmHg. Patients were classified as "normotensive," "uncontrolled," "white-coat hypertensive" and "masked hypertensive", (OBP below the limit and HBPM above). During the study, 81 patients (55 males, age 48.5 ± 14 years) were available for analysis. The mean OBP and HBP were 138/83 ± 14/10 mmHg and 133/79 ± 14/8 mmHg; 29% of patients were uncontrolled, 28% normotensive, 21% white coat, and 21% masked hypertensive. Age, glycemia, and number of antihypertensive drugs were associated with hypertension. Conclusion and Significance. In RTR, HBPM is well accepted and better define BP profile since there is 42% discrepancy between OBPM and HBPM. Whether this discrepancy is associated with worst outcome in the long term remains to be demonstrated.

Impact of norovirus/sapovirus-related diarrhea in renal transplant recipients hospitalized for diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea of unspecified cause frequently occurs after renal transplantation and is usually ascribed to mycophenolic acid toxicity. Norovirus (NoV) and sapovirus (SaV) have been sporadically reported to cause chronic diarrhea in immunocompromised patients. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective study (2008-2009) to examine the clinical and epidemiologic significance of NoV and SaV infections in adult renal transplant recipients hospitalized for acute or chronic diarrhea. RESULTS: Ninety-six renal transplant recipients were hospitalized for diarrhea at our institution during a 16-month period, 87 of whom were included in the study, including 46 patients with chronic diarrhea. Among 41 patients with unexplained diarrhea, 20 patients were screened for NoV/SaV, 16 of whom were positive. Fifteen of them (94%) had chronic diarrhea. When compared with bacterial and parasitic infections, NoV/SaV infections were associated with a greater weight loss at the time of admission, a 8.7-fold longer duration of symptoms and a more frequent need for mycophenolic acid dosage reduction. Eighty-one percent of patients hospitalized for NoV/SaV-associated diarrhea experienced acute renal failure. Five and one patients subsequently had biopsy-diagnosed active graft rejection and oxalate nephropathy, respectively. Ten of the 14 patients who underwent a longitudinal study of NoV/SaV stool's clearance exhibited a prolonged viral shedding period with a median time of 289 days (107-581 days). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that NoV/SaV infection causes posttransplant chronic diarrhea potentially complicated by severe kidney graft impairment.