Endovascular Repair of Juxtarenal and Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using a Novel Low-Profile Fenestrated Custom-Made Endograft: Technical Details and Short-Term Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to share preliminary experiences and outcomes with a novel custom-made fenestrated TREO® Abdominal Stent-Graft System to treat juxtarenal and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: Juxtarenal and pararenal AAA patients treated with the custom-made fenestrated TREO® Abdominal Stent-Graft System were included from 4 high-volume European academic medical centers from June 2021 to September 2023. Technical success and 30-day/in-hospital mortality and complications were analyzed. Technical success was defined as successful endovascular implantation of the stent graft with preservation of antegrade flow to the target vessels, and absence of type 1 or 2 endoleak (EL) at the first postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA). RESULTS: Forty-two consecutive patients were included. The majority of the devices were constructed with 2 (N=4; 9.5%), 3 (N=9; 21.4%), or 4 (N=27; 64%) fenestrations. In 1 case, the device was constructed with a single fenestration (2.4%) and 1 device contained 5 fenestrations (2.4%); 17% had previous AAA repair. Target vessel cannulation with placement of a bridging stent was successful in all but 1 vessel (99, 3%). One aneurysm-related death occurred in the direct postoperative period and 2 limb occlusions necessitated reintervention during admission. In the median follow-up period of 101 (2-620) days, 3 more patients died due to non-aneurysm-related causes. Technical success was achieved in 90% of the cases. Nineteen ELs were seen on the first postoperative CT scan: 1 type 1b EL (N=1; 2%), 15 type 2 ELs (N=15; 36%), and 3 type 3 ELs (N=3%). Eleven patients received more than 1 CT scan during a median follow-up of 361 days (82-620): 3 type 2 ELs resolved and 1 type 3 EL was treated in this period. In the follow-up, 1 patient had a coagulation disorder that caused occlusions of the branches. CONCLUSION: The results of the first experiences using the custom-made fenestrated TREO® Abdominal Stent-Graft System in Europe are promising. There was a low short-term mortality and morbidity rate in these patients of which 17% had previous AAA repair. Mid-term and long-term follow-up data are needed to evaluate endograft durability and performance. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study shows the first experiences and short-term results of a novel low-profile custom-made device: the custom-made fenestrated TREO® Abdominal Stent-Graft System. Showing these results and experiences can help the physicians in clinical decision-making for their patients.

Editor's Choice - Nationwide Analysis of Patients Undergoing Iliac Artery Aneurysm Repair in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: The new 2019 guideline of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) recommends consideration for elective iliac artery aneurysm (eIAA) repair when the iliac diameter exceeds 3.5 cm, as opposed to 3.0 cm previously. The current study assessed diameters at time of eIAA repair and ruptured IAA (rIAA) repair and compared clinical outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: This retrospective observational study used the nationwide Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) registry that includes all patients who undergo aorto-iliac aneurysm repair in the Netherlands. All patients who underwent primary IAA repair between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2018 were included. Diameters at time of eIAA and rIAA repair were compared in a descriptive fashion. The anatomical location of the IAA was not registered in the registry. Patient characteristics and outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared with appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: The DSAA registry comprised 974 patients who underwent IAA repair. A total of 851 patients were included after exclusion of patients undergoing revision surgery and patients with missing essential variables. eIAA repair was carried out in 713 patients, rIAA repair in 102, and symptomatic IAA repair in 36. OSR was performed in 205, EVAR in 618, and hybrid repairs and conversions in 28. The median maximum IAA diameter at the time of eIAA and rIAA repair was 43 (IQR 38-50) mm and 68 (IQR 58-85) mm, respectively. Mortality was 1.3% (95% CI 0.7-2.4) after eIAA repair and 25.5% (95% CI 18.0-34.7) after rIAA repair. Mortality was not significantly different between the OSR and EVAR subgroups. Elective OSR was associated with significantly more complications than EVAR (intra-operative: 9.8% vs. 3.6%, post-operative: 34.0% vs. 13.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, most eIAA repairs are performed at diameters larger than recommended by the ESVS guideline. These findings appear to support the recent increase in the threshold diameter for eIAA repair.

Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years.

BACKGROUND: The erosion of the early mortality advantage of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared with open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm remains without a satisfactory explanation. METHODS: An individual-patient data meta-analysis of four multicentre randomized trials of EVAR versus open repair was conducted to a prespecified analysis plan, reporting on mortality, aneurysm-related mortality and reintervention. RESULTS: The analysis included 2783 patients, with 14 245 person-years of follow-up (median 5·5 years). Early (0-6 months after randomization) mortality was lower in the EVAR groups (46 of 1393 versus 73 of 1390 deaths; pooled hazard ratio 0·61, 95 per cent c.i. 0·42 to 0·89; P = 0·010), primarily because 30-day operative mortality was lower in the EVAR groups (16 deaths versus 40 for open repair; pooled odds ratio 0·40, 95 per cent c.i. 0·22 to 0·74). Later (within 3 years) the survival curves converged, remaining converged to 8 years. Beyond 3 years, aneurysm-related mortality was significantly higher in the EVAR groups (19 deaths versus 3 for open repair; pooled hazard ratio 5·16, 1·49 to 17·89; P = 0·010). Patients with moderate renal dysfunction or previous coronary artery disease had no early survival advantage under EVAR. Those with peripheral artery disease had lower mortality under open repair (39 deaths versus 62 for EVAR; P = 0·022) in the period from 6 months to 4 years after randomization. CONCLUSION: The early survival advantage in the EVAR group, and its subsequent erosion, were confirmed. Over 5 years, patients of marginal fitness had no early survival advantage from EVAR compared with open repair. Aneurysm-related mortality and patients with low ankle : brachial pressure index contributed to the erosion of the early survival advantage for the EVAR group. Trial registration numbers: EVAR-1, ISRCTN55703451; DREAM (Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management), NCT00421330; ACE (Anévrysme de l'aorte abdominale, Chirurgie versus Endoprothèse), NCT00224718; OVER (Open Versus Endovascular Repair Trial for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms), NCT00094575.

Higher 30 Day Mortality in Patients with Familial Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm after EVAR.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of a positive family history for aneurysms on clinical success and mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, 1262 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) treated by EVAR were enrolled in a prospective, industry sponsored clinical registry ENGAGE. Patients were classified into familial and sporadic AAA patients according to baseline clinical reports. Clinical characteristics, aneurysm morphology, and follow-up were registered. The primary endpoint was clinical success after EVAR, a composite of technical success and freedom from the following complications: AAA increase >5 mm, type I and III endoleak, rupture, conversion, secondary procedures, migration, and occlusion. Secondary endpoints were the individual components of clinical success, 30 day mortality, and aneurysm related and all cause mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1262 AAA patients (89.5% male and mean age 73.1 years), 86 patients (6.8%) reported a positive family history and were classified as familial AAA. Duration of follow-up was 4.4 ± 1.7 years. Patients with familial AAA were more often female (18.6% vs. 9.9%, p = .012). No difference was observed in aneurysm morphology. There was no significant difference in clinical success between patients with familial and sporadic AAA (72.1% vs. 79.3%, p=.116). Familial AAA patients had a higher 30 day mortality after EVAR (4.7% vs. 1.0%, adjusted HR 5.7, 1.8-17.9, p = .003) as well as aneurysm related mortality (5.8% vs. 1.3%, adjusted HR 5.4, 1.9-14.9, p = .001), while no difference was observed in all cause mortality (19.8% vs. 24.3%, adjusted HR 0.8, 0.5-1.4, p = .501). CONCLUSIONS: The current study shows a higher 30 day mortality after EVAR in familial AAA patients. Future studies should determine the role of family history in AAA treatment, suitability for endovascular or open repair, and on adaptation of post-operative surveillance. For the time being, patients with familial forms of AAA should be considered at higher risk for EVAR and warrant extra vigilance.

Individual Differences in Heparin Sensitivity and Their Effect on Heparin Anticoagulation During Arterial Vascular Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether a fixed heparin dose results in adequate heparinisation levels and consequent inhibition of haemostatic activation in all patients. METHODS: This prospective clinical pilot study included 24 patients undergoing arterial vascular surgery. Individual heparin responsiveness was assessed using the Heparin Dose Response (HDR) test, while the activated clotting time (ACT) and heparin concentration were measured to monitor the peri-procedural degree of anticoagulation. Finally, peri-operative haemostasis was evaluated with rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). RESULTS: Eight patients were identified with reduced heparin sensitivity (RS group) and 16 patients with normal heparin sensitivity (NS group). Compared with the NS group, the RS group showed less prolonged ACTs after heparinisation with heparin concentrations below the calculated target heparin concentration. ROTEM revealed shorter clot formation times in the intrinsically activated coagulation test (INTEM) 3 min (114 ± 48 s vs. 210 ± 128 s) and 30 min after the initial heparin bolus (103 ± 48 s vs. 173 ± 81 s) in the RS group compared with the NS group. In the RS group, one patient developed a major thromboembolic complication. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a third of the study population had reduced heparin sensitivity, which was associated with lower levels of heparinisation, and lower inhibition levels of clot initiation and clot formation. Identifying patients with reduced heparin sensitivity by monitoring the anticoagulant effect of heparin could decrease the risk of thrombotic complications after arterial vascular surgery.

Quality of life from a randomized trial of open and endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival is similar after open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Few data exist on the effect of either procedure on long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health status. METHODS: Patients enrolled in a multicentre randomized clinical trial (DREAM trial; 2000-2003) in Europe of open repair versus endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm were asked to complete questionnaires on health status and HRQoL. HRQoL scores were assessed at baseline and at 13 time points thereafter, using generic tools, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36®) and EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D™). Physical (PCS) and mental component summary scores were also calculated. Follow-up was 5 years. RESULTS: Some 332 of 351 patients enrolled in the trial returned questionnaires. More than 70 per cent of questionnaires were returned at each time point. Both surgical interventions had a short-term negative effect on HRQoL and health status. This was less severe in the EVAR group than in the open repair group. In the longer term the physical domains of SF-36® favoured open repair: mean difference in PCS score between open repair and EVAR -1·98 (95 per cent c.i. -3·56 to -0·41). EQ-5D™ descriptive and EQ-5D™ visual analogue scale scores for open repair were also superior to those for EVAR after the initial 6-week interval: mean difference -0·06 (-0·10 to -0·02) and -4·09 (-6·91 to -1·27) respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study EVAR appeared to be associated with less severe disruption to HRQoL and health status in the short term. However, during longer-term follow-up to 5 years, patients receiving open repair appeared to have improved quality of life and health status.

Cumulative incidence of graft infection after primary prosthetic aortic reconstruction in the endovascular era.

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of endovascular techniques has had a major impact on the case mix of patients that undergo open aortic reconstruction. Hypothetically, this may also have increased the incidence of aortic graft infection (AGI). The aim of this study was to report on the short and mid-term incidence of AGI after primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction in the endovascular era. METHODS: From 2000 to 2010, all 514 patients in a tertiary referral university hospital, undergoing primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive aortic disease with at least one aortic anastomosis were included. Data were obtained by retrospectively analyzing the medical records, by contacting patients or their general practitioner by telephone, and by merging the dataset with the national Cause of Death Register. AGI was defined as proven by cultures or clinically in combination with positive imaging results. The 30 day, 1 year, and 2 year incidence rates were computed using life table analysis and expressed as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: AGI was diagnosed in 23 of the 514 included patients. 56% of the patients underwent elective surgery and 86% underwent surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The 30 day incidence was 1.6% (95% CI 0.4-2.8%), 1 year incidence was 3.6% (95% CI 1.7-5.5%), and 2 year incidence for AGI was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4-6.6%). The total number of person years (1058) yielded an AGI rate of 2.2 per 100 person years. CONCLUSION: The 2 year cumulative incidence of AGI following primary, open aortic procedures with at least one aortic anastomosis is considerable, at around 1 in 20.

Differential FDG-PET Uptake Patterns in Uninfected and Infected Central Prosthetic Vascular Grafts.

OBJECTIVE: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scanning has been suggested as a means to detect vascular graft infections. However, little is known about the typical FDG uptake patterns associated with synthetic vascular graft implantation. The aim of the present study was to compare uninfected and infected central vascular grafts in terms of various parameters used to interpret PET images. METHODS: From 2007 through 2013, patients in whom a FDG-PET scan was performed for any indication after open or endovascular central arterial prosthetic reconstruction were identified. Graft infection was defined as the presence of clinical or biochemical signs of graft infection with positive cultures or based on a combination of clinical, biochemical, and imaging parameters (other than PET scan data). All other grafts were deemed uninfected. PET images were analyzed using maximum systemic uptake value (SUVmax), tissue to background ratio (TBR), visual grading scale (VGS), and focality of FDG uptake (focal or homogenous). RESULTS: Twenty-seven uninfected and 32 infected grafts were identified. Median SUVmax was 3.3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-4.2) for the uninfected grafts and 5.7 for the infected grafts (IQR 2.2-7.8). Mean TBR was 2.0 (IQR 1.4-2.5) and 3.2 (IQR 1.5-3.5), respectively. On VGS, 44% of the uninfected and 72% of the infected grafts were judged as a high probability for infection. Homogenous FDG uptake was noted in 74% of the uninfected and 31% of the infected grafts. Uptake patterns of uninfected and infected grafts showed a large overlap for all parameters. CONCLUSION: The patterns of FDG uptake for uninfected vascular grafts largely overlap with those of infected vascular grafts. This questions the value of these individual FDG-PET-CT parameters in identifying infected grafts.

Renal function 5 years after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair from a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Deterioration of renal function after major vascular surgery is an important complication, and may vary between patients undergoing endovascular (EVAR) or open surgical (OR) repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The objective was to determine the impact of OR and EVAR on renal function after 5 years. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of data collected prospectively from the Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) trial. Five years after surgery, creatinine levels were available for 189 patients (94 after OR and 95 after EVAR). The severity of renal disease was staged using the chronic kidney disease classification of the US National Kidney Foundation clinical guidelines. RESULTS: Using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for the entire group declined over time, with a mean(s.d.) preoperative value of 80·0(7·6) ml per min per 1·73 m(2) compared with 75·7(9·7) ml per min per 1·73 m(2) after 5 years (mean difference 4·2 (95 per cent confidence interval 3·2 to 5·3) ml per min per 1·73 m(2) ; P < 0·001). Five years after surgery, the mean eGFR (CKD-EPI equation) was not significantly different between the OR and EVAR groups: 76·3(9·3) versus 75·1(10·0) ml per min per 1·73 m(2) (mean difference 1·2 (-1·6 to 3·9) ml per min per 1·73 m(2) ; P = 0·410). CONCLUSION: Renal function 5 years after OR and EVAR for AAA was similar. Neither surgical procedure accelerated the loss of renal function.

Residual infrarenal aortic neck following endovascular and open aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of open and endovascular aneurysm repair of aortic abdominal aneurysms (AAAs) can be jeopardised by deterioration of the residual infrarenal neck of the aneurysm. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to determine the length of the residual infrarenal aortic segment after endovascular and open aneurysm repair. METHODS: In a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing open and endovascular AAA repair, 165 patients were discharged after open AAA repair (OR) and 169 after endovascular repair (EVAR). Immediately after the operation, surgeons were asked to enter in the case record form whether the level of their anastomosis after open repair was within or beyond 10 mm of the caudal renal artery. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans that were obtained within 6 months after surgery were used for comparative analysis. The distance between the caudal renal artery and the proximal anastomosis of the (endo-) graft was measured using axial CT slices and a standardised protocol. CT images were available and suitable for analysis in 156 (95%) of 165 OR patients and in 160 (95%) of 169 EVAR patients. Data are presented as median (range). Differences were analysed using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: The distance from the caudal renal artery to the proximal anastomosis was 24 mm (16-30 mm) in the OR group versus 0 mm (0-6 mm) in the EVAR group (p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney). In 140 of 156 (90%) patients, at least 1 cm of untreated infrarenal neck persisted after OR and in 17 of 160 (10%) after EVAR. In 84 of the 156 open repair patients (54%), the surgeon had indicated that the proximal anastomosis was within 10 mm of the caudal renal artery. Only five surgeons (6%) were accurate in this respect. CONCLUSION: After open repair, a longer segment of the infrarenal aortic neck is left untreated compared with endovascular repair and this length is underestimated by most surgeons. Long-term studies are required to determine the consequences of this difference.

Intragraft Obstructive Thrombus Two Years After Endovascular Repair of Traumatic Aortic Injury: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the treatment of choice for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) and has proven to be a good alternative to open surgery. TEVAR requires less operation time, has fewer complications, can be used for relatively unstable patients, and is associated with a significantly lower mortality rate. Moreover, long term follow up data demonstrate low re-intervention rates and stentgraft failure. REPORT: The case of a 21 year old man who sustained severe trauma, including a traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta distal to the left subclavian artery in 2016, is presented. The patient was treated by TEVAR. Two years later, he presented with progressive paraplegia due to stentgraft occlusion occurring four days after a new high velocity motor vehicle accident. An axillofemoral bypass was performed to assure blood flow to the lower body. Two days later the stentgraft was removed via left thoracotomy and replaced by a Dacron graft. Gross examination showed severe thrombus formation at the proximal edge, and a thrombotic occlusion in the middle and distal third of the stent. After three months of hospitalisation the patient was discharged to a rehabilitation clinic with partial recovery of his paraplegia. As of June 2020, the patient was able to walk without assistance and his paraplegia improved with only loss of sensation of his lower legs. CONCLUSION: A serious thrombotic complication two years after TEVAR is described. Although TEVAR is the currently preferred treatment for BTAI, more research is needed to examine the mechanisms behind this thrombotic complication and to elucidate whether TEVAR is definitive treatment or a "bridge to further surgery". Smaller diameter stentgrafts, anticoagulation, regular (lifelong) follow up imaging, and prophylactic surgical conversion in (selected) patients might help to prevent this serious complication.

Validation of the Simulator for Testing and Rating Endovascular SkillS (STRESS)-machine in a setting of competence testing.

AIM: Endovascular skills are an integral part of modern-day vascular surgery. The STRESS machine has been developed to test these skills in vascular surgeons. This study aims to define an optimal pass/fail cutoff value for the STRESS test score. METHODS: The STRESS machine consists of a dry glass model of the abdominal aorta and its tributaries with various stenotic lesions, elongations, and tortuosities. A camera and computer software are used to simulate plain fluoroscopy-mode. The test subjects are given two assignments after which two reviewers use a combination of the ICEPS and MRS to produce the final total score; 43 subjects were tested. According to previous endovascular experience, subjects were classified into four groups: novice-low (no experience, less than 11 performed procedures, less than 50 assisted procedures), novice-high (11-25 performed procedures, more than 50 assisted procedures), intermediate (1-10 performed and >11-25 assisted procedures, 11-25 performed and >1-10 assisted procedures or 25-50 performed procedures) and advanced (more than 50 performed procedures). RESULTS: Test-score and noted experience showed a correlation of 0.794. All intermediate and advanced test subjects scored more than 50 points compared to 4 out of 15 novices. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that it is possible to determine an optimal cut-off value for competence testing with the STRESS machine.

Assessing endovascular skills using the Simulator for Testing and Rating Endovascular Skills (STRESS) machine.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular techniques are an integral part of modern-day vascular surgery practice and training. Nevertheless, validated in vitro assessment tools for these skills are scarce. This study describes the development and pilot testing of the Simulator for Testing and Rating Endovascular Skills (STRESS machine). DESIGN: The design was kept straightforward and compact, without the need for contrast or fluoroscopy. A specific technical skill score was designed analogous to the Imperial College Evaluation of Procedural Skill (ICEPS), an assessment score for open surgical skill. This score was combined with an already validated global rating assessment to form the total score (TS). METHODS: A pilot study was carried out on 18 candidates of varying levels of expertise: novice, intermediate and expert, who were assessed by two independent observers to test inter-observer reliability. RESULTS: Inter-observer reliability was excellent, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the TS was 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-0.97). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant difference between the novice and expert groups (p<0.001), between the novice and intermediate groups (p<0.01) and between the intermediate and expert groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The STRESS machine, in combination with the specific technical skill score and global rating assessment, provides a reliable method of discriminating between the novice, intermediate and expert candidates with excellent inter-observer variability.

Endovascular aneurysm repair: state-of-art imaging techniques for preoperative planning and surveillance.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) represents one of the greatest advances in vascular surgery over the past 50 years. In contrast to conventional aneurysm repair, EVAR requires accurate preoperative imaging and stringent postoperative surveillance. Duplex ultrasound (DUS), transesophageal echocardiography, intravascular ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR), each provide useful information for patient selection, choice of endograft type and surveillance. Today most interventionists and surgeons will rely on CT or MR to assess aortic morphology, evaluate access artery patency and locate side branch orifices. However, recent developments in cross-sectional imaging, including advanced image postprocessing, multi-modality image fusion and new contrast agents have resulted in improved spatial resolution for preoperative planning. Advanced reconstruction algorithms, like dynamic CTA and MRA, provide valuable information on dynamic changes in aneurysm morphology that might have an important impact on endograft selection. During follow-up, imaging of the graft and aneurysm is of utmost importance to identify patients in need of secondary intervention. This has led to rigorous follow-up protocols including duplex ultrasound and regular CT examinations. The use of these intense follow-up protocols has recently been questioned because of high radiation dose and the frequent use of nephrotoxic contrast agents. New imaging modalities like contrast enhanced DUS, dynamic MR and dual-source CT could reduce radiation dose and obviate the need for nephrotoxic contrast. Up-to-date knowledge of non-invasive vascular imaging and image processing is crucial for EVAR planning and is essential for the development of follow-up programs involving reduced risk of harmful side effects.

Preservation for future use of the autologous saphenous vein during femoro-popliteal bypass surgery is inexpedient.

PURPOSE: To investigate the usefulness of greater saphenous vein preservation for future vascular reconstructions during femoro-popliteal bypass surgery. DESIGN: Post-hoc analysis of data acquired in a randomized multi-centre clinical trial comparing two different vascular prostheses (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT 00523263). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The true frequency of ipsilateral saphenous vein use in subsequent femoro-popliteal and coronary bypass surgery was investigated through case-record analysis with a median follow-up of 60 months in 100 consecutive patients, that received a prosthetic femoro-popliteal bypass between 1996 and 2001. RESULTS: An ipsilateral secondary femoro-popliteal bypass was performed in 11 patients (11%) at a mean interval of 34 months (range 1-96). The ipsilateral saphenous vein was applied for these procedures in 8 cases (8%). The cumulative probability of receiving a subsequent bypass was 8% at 3 years and 10% at 5 years follow-up respectively. One patient (1%) underwent CABG at 8 years follow-up with the use of ipsilateral lower leg saphenous vein segments only. CONCLUSION: Preservation of the greater saphenous vein in supragenicular femoro-popliteal bypass surgery is not a valid argument for application of prosthetic material.

Preoperative MRA flow quantification in CEA patients: flow differences between patients who develop cerebral ischemia and patients who do not develop cerebral ischemia during cross-clamping of the carotid artery.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to investigate whether preoperative volume flow in the internal carotid arteries (ICAs), the basilar artery (BA), and the middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) and collateral flow via the circle of Willis differ between patients who do and patients who do not develop cerebral ischemia during clamping of the carotid artery in carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: Quantitative volume flow in the ICAs, BA, and MCAs and directional flow in the circle of Willis were measured preoperatively with 2-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography in 86 CEA patients. During the operation, electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings were obtained that were monitored by a clinical neurophysiologist. Reference volume flow values were assessed in 24 control subjects. RESULTS: In patients with an ICA stenosis without contralateral ICA occlusion (n=62), of whom 16% developed ischemic EEG changes during clamping, preoperative flow in the clamped ICA was significantly higher in patients with cerebral ischemia than in patients without (mean, 278 versus 160 mL/min; P:<0.05). Flow in the contralateral ICA (156 versus 273 mL/min; P:<0.01), flow in the BA (116 versus 165 mL/min; P:<0.05), and presence of collateral flow via the circle of Willis to the clamped ICA (0% versus 37%; P:<0.05) were significantly lower. MCA flow did not differ significantly between groups. Additionally, in patients with an ICA stenosis and a contralateral ICA occlusion (n=24), of whom 42% developed cerebral ischemia, preoperative flow in the clamped ICA was significantly higher in patients with cerebral ischemia than in patients without (309 versus 239 mL/min; P:<0.05). BA flow, MCA flow, and presence of willisian collateral flow (0% versus 14%) did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative volume flow in the clamped ICA is significantly higher in CEA patients with ischemic EEG changes during clamping than in CEA patients without such changes. The latter patients probably have better developed collateral pathways preoperatively.

The effects of long-term graft preservation and prostaglandin E1 on intraoperative hemodynamic changes in liver transplantation. A comparison between orthotopic and heterotopic transplantation in the pig.

The study aimed to compare the intraoperative hemodynamic changes during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with those during heterotopic liver transplantation (HLT) after different durations of cold storage of the graft. The effect of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on these parameters was also studied. Sixty-nine female Yorkshire pigs underwent either OLT (n = 32) or HLT (n = 37) with a graft stored for 2 hr (n = 31), 24 hr (n = 16), 48 hr (n = 7), or 72 hr (n = 15). In 16 transplantations in the various groups, PGE1 was given intravenously to both donor and recipient animals and it was added to the preservation and flushing solutions. Univariate nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon rank-sum) were used for analysis of cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), left and right ventricular minute work (LVMW, RVMW), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance (SVR, PVR), at different intervals during the operative procedure. For the three main variables--i.e., the type of transplantation, the use of PGE1, and the preservation time, multiple regression analysis was performed. During HLT, portal vein clamping lowered MAP and CO, while during the anhepatic phase in OLT, SVR increased and CO dropped. After recirculation of the graft, an increase in PVR and a decrease in SVR were found in both OLT and HLT. At different stages of the surgical procedure, longer graft storage time diminished CO and MAP (P less than 0.001), especially in OLT. PGE1 appeared to reduce the cardiovascular reserves needed to compensate the changes after recirculation of the graft. The observed differences in intraoperative hemodynamics between OLT and HLT can partly be attributed to differences in operative techniques. Extension of the graft preservation period resulted in poor cardiac performance, more so in OLT than HLT. The native liver in HLT might be able to metabolize the presumed myocardial depressant factors, released by the graft upon reperfusion. Prostaglandin E1 did not protect against the reperfusion syndrome.

Intraoperative hemodynamics in liver transplantation comparing orthotopic with heterotopic transplantation in the pig.

The intraoperative hemodynamic changes and several graft function parameters were studied comparing orthotopic liver transplantation with auxiliary partial liver transplantation (APLT) in the pig. Thirty-one Yorkshire pigs (ca. 25 kg b.w.) were randomly allocated to OLT (n = 16) or APLT (n = 15). During the construction of portal anastomosis the median cardiac output dropped to 67% of the initial value in OLT and to 49% in APLT (P less than 0.02). Median duration of the portal flow interruption was shorter in APLT: 15 min versus 48 min in OLT (P less than 0.002). After unclamping of the aorta, the median systolic blood pressure dropped to 75 mmHg in OLT and to 90 mmHg in APLT (P less than 0.02). APLT is less time-consuming: median duration of transplantation was 128 min versus 165 min in OLT (P less than 0.002). SGOT levels were lower in APLT than in OLT (median SGOT on the first postoperative day 67 was IU/L versus 177 IU/L, P less than 0.002). It is concluded that APLT is a shorter procedure than OLT with a shorter portal flow interruption, being less offensive to the recipient.

Repeated resection of recurrent pulmonary metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

A series of nine patients who presented with recurrent lung metastases from soft tissue sarcoma after pulmonary surgery were treated with a second or further thoracotomy. There were no postoperative deaths. The median interval between the first and second thoracotomy was 23 months. Four patients underwent three or more operations. Post-thoracotomy survival was 24-209 months after the first thoracotomy. Five patients are alive after repeated thoracotomies more than 10 years after initial treatment of the primary STS. It is concluded that in cases of recurrent lung metastases from STS repeated thoracotomy is the best therapy if all metastases can be removed completely.

Preoperative imaging of the aortoiliac anatomy in endovascular aneurysm surgery.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EAR) requires precise measurement of aortoiliac lengths and diameters to select the most suitable endograft. A combination of computed tomography (CT) scanning and contrast arteriography is usually applied for this purpose. We have investigated whether spiral CT angiography with specialized data processing (CTA) may replace these imaging methods as a sole technique for sizing of endografts for EAR and present these data as a background for discussion of preoperative imaging before EAR. Typical measurements for EAR were performed using CTA, conventional CT scanning, and arteriography. The resulting measurements were compared, and their consequences on graft selection were studied. Graft diameters based on arteriography were too small in 62% of the patients, as compared with CTA. The difference in length sizing between CTA and arteriography never exceeded 1 cm. A similar graft diameter was selected by conventional CT scan and CTA in 81% of the patients, whereas minor graft oversizing by conventional CT scan was found in 14% of the patients. Length sizing by conventional CT scanning resulted in underestimation of graft length in 91% of the patients. Neither conventional CT scanning nor arteriography is adequate as a sole preoperative radiological investigation for endograft sizing in EAR. Spiral CTA with special processing combines the specific advantages of both imaging techniques and should be regarded as the method of first choice for this purpose.