Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?

PURPOSE: Persistence or recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (prSUI) after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation may be secondary to non-mechanical failure (NOMECA). It have for long been assumed to result from urethral atrophy. Its existence is now debated. As the pathophysiology of NOMECA is not elucidated, the most appropriate management remains unclear. We aimed to compare the several revision techniques for NOMECA of AUS in men. METHODS: NOMECA was defined as prSUI, with normally functioning device, no erosion, infection or fluid loss. Exclusion criteria were neurogenic SUI, revision or explantation for other causes. From 1991 to 2022, 143 AUS revisions for NOMECA, including 99 cuff DOWNSIZING, 10 cuff repositioning (RELOC), 13 TANDEM-CUFF placement, 18 cuff changing (CHANGE), three increasing balloon pressure (BALLOON-UP), were performed in 10 centers. BALLOON-UP patients weren't included in comparative analysis due to small sample size. All components could be changed during the revision. Patients were also categorized in COMPLETE-CHANGE vs. PARTIAL-CHANGE of the device. RESULTS: The three-months complete continence rate was 70.8% with a significant difference between RELOC and DOWNSIZING groups (p = 0.04). COMPLETE CHANGE was significantly associated with complete continence status at three months in multivariate analysis (83.3% vs. 63.3%, OR = 2.7; CI 95% [1.1-7.1], p = 0.03). Estimated five-year reoperation-free and explantation-free survival were respectively 63.4% and 75.9% (p = 0.16; p = 0.30). Those were significantly longer in COMPLETE-CHANGE vs PARTIAL-CHANGE (82.2% vs. 69.6%, p = 0.03); (71.2% vs. 58.2%, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: AUS revision for prSUI due to NOMECA yields satisfactory outcomes regardless of the technique used. We observed better functional outcomes when repositioning the new cuff. COMPLETE-CHANGE may improve functional outcomes, explantation-free and reoperation-free survivals.

Lower urinary tract involvement in Ehlers-Danlos and Joint Hypermobility syndromes: Review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) and Joint Hypermobility syndrome (JHS) are still poorly understood, with a prevalence of 1/5000 for EDS and 1/500 for JHS. They are characterized by multisystem involvement. Urological involvement has been little studied. The aim was to carry out a review of the literature on the urological involvement of EDS and JHS. METHOD: A review of the literature was carried out using the following databases: Pubmed, Canadian Hospitals and EMBASE. Search terms were "Ehlers-Danlos" or "Joint Hypermobility" associated with "Urology", "Bladder", "Pelvic Organ Prolapse", "Urinary Retention", "Leak", "Leakage", "Urinary Incontinence", "Urinary Tract Infection" and "Urdodynamic", no filters were added. RESULTS: Seventy-three articles were included for a total of 259 found. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in EDS is estimated at 50-60%, and that of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) at 29-75%. Bladder diverticula are also frequently reported. For JHS, the prevalence of urinary incontinence is estimated between 40 and 73%, that of POP increased with 73% of stage greater than 2, g-JHS patients are almost 3 times more affected by prolapses (OR=2.37) which seem more severe. Patients with vesicoureteral reflux, most often severe, are more affected by joint hypermobility (OR=2.79). Few studies have been carried out on urological assessment and treatment modalities. CONCLUSION: EDS patients often have urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse or bladder diverticula. JHS patients frequently have urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and vesicoureteral reflux.