Astigmatic equivalence of 2.2-mm and 1.8-mm superior clear corneal cataract incision.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the astigmatic effects of 2.2-mm and 1.8-mm cataract incisions. METHODS: A randomized prospective study of 190 eyes of 151 patients undergoing superior clear corneal incision (SCCI) was divided into three groups: 61 eyes with a control 3.2-mm SCCI; 66 eyes with a 2.2-mm SCCI; and 63 eyes with a 1.8-mm SCCI. The corneal astigmatism was measured with an autokeratometer preoperatively and 1 month after surgery. The with-the-wound (WTW), against the-wound (ATW), and WTW-ATW changes were calculated using the Holladay-Cravy-Koch formula. RESULTS: The WTW, ATW, and WTW-ATW changes were significantly higher for the control 3.2-mm SCCI than for the 2.2- and 1.8-mm SCCI (all p < 0.001), and no difference was found between the 2.2- and 1.8-mm SCCI incision groups. CONCLUSION: In our study, the astigmatic effects were the same for the 2.2 mm and 1.8 mm incisions and as expected, were significantly lower than the control 3.2 mm incision group.

Analysis of visual and refractive results after wedge resection for high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To analyze visual and refractive results after wedge resection to correct high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for keratoconus. SETTING: Cornea Unit of the Centro de Oftalmología Barraquer Barcelona, Spain. DESIGN: A retrospective quasi-experimental, before and after study. METHODS: Patients who developed high astigmatism or ectasia in the graft-host junction after PK were treated with wedge resection. The following variables were studied before the surgery, 1-year after and at the final visit: uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive and topographic astigmatism and spherical equivalent. Vectorial analysis of the astigmatism changes was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-one eyes were included with a mean follow-up of 4.19 ± 3.09 years. Mean refractive astigmatism was 11.47 ± 3.57 diopters (D) pre-operatively and 4.79 ± 3.32 D at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean centroid changed from 2.65 ± 11.82 D at 23 degrees preoperatively to 0.35 ± 5.86 D at 127 degrees postoperatively. Concerning spherical equivalent, the mean preoperative value was -3.10 ± 4.15 D and the mean postoperative value was -1.55 ± 3.41 D (p = 0.002). Mean pre-operative and final follow-up UDVA were 1.25 ± 0.27 and 0.84 ± 0.50 (p < 0.001). Mean Pre-op and final follow-up CDVA were 0.27 ± 0.19 and 0.24 ± 0.24. CONCLUSIONS: Wedge resection is a useful surgical procedure to correct high astigmatism. It is a safe technique with moderate efficacy and may be considered as initial procedure of choice in high astigmatism due to long-term ectasia in the graft-host junction after PK for keratoconus.

Estimation of true corneal power after keratorefractive surgery in eyes requiring cataract surgery: BESSt formula.

PURPOSE: To describe a new formula, BESSt, to estimate true corneal power after keratorefractive surgery in eyes requiring cataract surgery. SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: The BESSt formula, based on the Gaussian optics formula, was developed using data from 143 eyes that had keratorefractive surgery. The formula takes into account anterior and posterior corneal radii and pachymetry (Pentacam, Oculus) and does not require pre-keratorefractive surgery information. A software program was developed (BESSt Corneal Power Calculator), and corneal power was calculated in 13 eyes that had keratorefractive surgery and required cataract surgery. RESULTS: In the eyes having phacoemulsification, target refractions calculated with the BESSt formula were statistically significantly closer to the postoperative manifest refraction (mean deviation 0.08 diopters [D] +/- 0.62 [SD]) than those calculated with other methods as follows: history technique (-0.07 +/- 1.92 D; P = .05); history technique with double-K adjustment (0.13 +/- 2.39 D; P = .05); Holladay 2 with K-values estimated with the contact lens method (-0.76 +/- 1.36 D; P = .03); Holladay 2 with K-values from Atlas topographer (Humphrey) (-0.55 +/- 0.61 D; P<.01). Using the BESSt formula, 46% of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of the intended refraction and 100% were within +/-1.00 D. CONCLUSIONS: The BESSt formula was statistically significantly more accurate than the other techniques tested. Thus, it could significantly improve intraocular lens power calculation accuracy after keratorefractive surgery, especially when pre-refractive surgery data are unavailable.

Torque and flattening effects of clear corneal temporal and on-axis incisions for phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE: To compare the torque and flattening effect induced by temporal or on-axis clear corneal incisions (CCIs) for phacoemulsification. SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: Randomized controlled clinical trial on 62 eyes with cataract and mild to moderate corneal astigmatism (<2.60 diopters [D]) having phacoemulsification with a temporal CCI (temporal group) or on-axis CCI (on-axis group). Corneal astigmatism was assessed by corneal topography preoperatively and 3 weeks after surgery. The meridian of the incisions was marked on the cornea before local anesthesia was given to avoid anesthesia-related cyclotorsion. The surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) vector, torque, flattening effect, and accuracy of incision placement were analyzed in the 2 groups and compared with a paired t test. RESULTS: Three weeks after surgery, the on-axis CCI induced slightly more flattening of the meridian of the incision (mean -0.63 +/- 0.57 D [SD]) than the temporal CCI (mean -0.50 +/- 0.44 D); however, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .31). Simple algebraic difference showed a mean increase in astigmatism magnitude of 0.12 +/- 0.52 D in the temporal group and a mean reduction of 0.21 +/- 0.53 D in the on-axis group (P = .02). The mean absolute torque was 0.28 +/- 0.27 D and 0.53 +/- 0.37 D, respectively (P<.005). The absolute angle of error of incision placement (alpha) was greater after on-axis CCIs (mean 25.9 +/- 20.1 degrees) than after temporal CCIs (mean 14.5 +/- 14.3 degrees) (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with preoperative astigmatism less than 2.60 D, on-axis CCI phacoemulsification induced slightly more flattening along the incision meridian than temporal CCI phacoemulsification, although the differences were not significant. The on-axis CCI was associated with significantly greater absolute torque and angle of error than the temporal CCI. These factors could limit the benefit of placing the incision on axis when the aim is to reduce preoperative astigmatism in phacoemulsification.

Surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification in eyes with mild to moderate corneal astigmatism: temporal versus on-axis clear corneal incisions.

PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a difference in surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 2 types of clear corneal incisions used in phacoemulsification: the temporal and the on-axis (ie, on the steeper corneal meridian) clear corneal incision (CCTI and CCOI, respectively). SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: In a prospective randomized controlled trial (pilot study), 61 eyes with cataract and mild to moderate corneal astigmatism (<2.58 diopters [D] on corneal topography) having phacoemulsification (single surgeon, 3.2 mm incision) were randomized to receive CCTI or CCOI. Main outcome measures included postoperative BCVA and corneal astigmatism and SIA (calculated using the Holladay vector analysis formula). Measurements were repeated postoperatively at 3 weeks in all eyes, whereas only 46 eyes made it to the final assessment at 8 weeks. Continuous variables between groups were compared by Student t test. The power of the study was calculated. RESULTS: At the first follow-up, the difference in SIA between the 2 incision types was 0.15 D and it was not statistically significant (0.65 D in CCOI; 0.50 D in CCTI). At the second follow-up, the difference was 0.29 D and it was statistically significant (0.63 D in CCOI; 0.34 D in CCTI; P = .0004). There was no statistically significant difference in the final postoperative visual acuity. The power of the pilot study was 72%. CONCLUSION: Seven weeks after small-incision phacoemulsification, the CCTI induced less SIA than the CCOI; however, there were no significant differences in the final UCVA and BCVA.

Brittle cornea syndrome ZNF469 mutation carrier phenotype and segregation analysis of rare ZNF469 variants in familial keratoconus.

PURPOSE: Brittle cornea syndrome 1 (BCS1) is a rare recessive condition characterized by extreme thinning of the cornea and sclera, caused by mutations in ZNF469. Keratoconus is a relatively common disease characterized by progressive thinning and ectasia of the cornea. The etiology of keratoconus is complex and not yet understood, but rare ZNF469 variants have recently been associated with disease. We investigated the phenotype of BCS1 carriers with known pathogenic ZNF469 mutations, and recruited families in which aggregation of keratoconus was observed to establish if rare variants in ZNF469 segregated with disease. METHODS: Patients and family members were recruited and underwent comprehensive anterior segment examination, including corneal topography. Blood samples were donated and genomic DNA was extracted. The coding sequence and splice sites of ZNF469 were PCR amplified and Sanger sequenced. RESULTS: Four carriers of three BCS1-associated ZNF469 loss-of-function mutations (p.[Glu1392Ter], p.[Gln1930Argfs*6], p.[Gln1930fs*133]) were examined and none had keratoconus. One carrier had partially penetrant features of BCS1, including joint hypermobility. ZNF469 sequencing in 11 keratoconus families identified 9 rare (minor allele frequency [MAF] ≤ 0.025) variants predicted to be potentially damaging. However, in each instance the rare variant(s) identified, including two previously reported as potentially keratoconus-associated, did not segregate with the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of heterozygous loss-of-function alleles in the ZNF469 gene did not cause keratoconus in the individuals examined. None of the rare nonsynonymous ZNF469 variants identified in the familial cohort conferred a high risk of keratoconus; therefore, genetic variants contributing to disease pathogenesis in these 11 families remain to be identified.

Long-term stability of keratometric astigmatism after limbal relaxing incisions.

PURPOSE: To study the keratometric stability of limbal relaxing incisions (LRIs) performed during cataract surgery. SETTING: Princess Royal University Hospital, Kent, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Medical notes of patients who had small-incision cataract surgery combined with LRIs between November 2006 and December 2010 were reviewed. Keratometric astigmatism was measured using Scheimpflug pachymetry (Pentacam). Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was calculated using the Astig Plot application. RESULTS: Twenty eyes of 20 patients were evaluated. The median keratometric astigmatism preoperatively and 2 weeks, 10 weeks, and 3 years postoperatively was 2.1 diopters (D) (interquartile range [IQR], 1.7 to 2.4 D), 1.3 D (IQR, 0.9 to 2.1 D), 1.2 D (IQR, 0.5 to 1.7 D), and 1.0 D (IQR, 0.7 to 1.4 D), respectively. There were no significant differences in keratometric astigmatism between 2 weeks and 10 weeks postoperatively (P=.35) or between 10 weeks and 3 years postoperatively (P=.72). The median SIA 2 weeks, 10 weeks, and 3 years postoperatively was 2.2 D (IQR, 1.6 to 4.1 D), 2.1 D (IQR, 1.2 to 2.7 D), and 1.8 D (IQR, 1.2 to 2.5 D), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in SIA between 2 weeks and 10 weeks postoperatively (P=.002) but not between 10 weeks and 3 years postoperatively (P=.72). CONCLUSION: The keratometric effects of LRIs were stable from 10 weeks to 3 years postoperatively. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Borasio is the creator of Astig Plot. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.