Abdominal Pain Severity Is Mainly Associated with Bloating Severity in Patients with Functional Bowel Disorders and Functional Abdominal Pain.

PURPOSE: Abdominal pain is a cardinal sign of functional bowel disorders (FBD), in favor of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, the determinants of abdominal pain severity (APS) are unknown. The present study aimed to search the relationships between APS and demographic, psychological, and clinical parameters in tertiary care FBD outpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 2043 new outpatients with FBD or functional abdominal pain. They fulfilled the Rome III questionnaire, psychological evaluation, and four 10-points Likert scale for the perceived severity of constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and abdominal pain. Linear regression was performed for each phenotype to model the severity of abdominal pain with demographic, psychological parameters, and symptoms severity. RESULTS: APS was positively associated with bloating severity in all phenotypes, but APS was also associated with other variables according to gender and phenotype. APS was negatively associated with age and positively with depression, constipation severity, and diarrhea severity in female patients. In male patients, APS was associated with state anxiety, constipation severity, and diarrhea severity. APS severity was associated with bloating severity and transit severity in IBS patients, while in non-IBS patients, APS was only associated with bloating severity. CONCLUSION: Perceived abdominal pain severity is always associated with perceived bloating severity in FBD and FAP patients.

Self-Perceived Stress Is Associated With Chest Pain and Personality in Patients With Refractory Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.

ABSTRACT: Stressful events are frequently associated with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). This study aims to determine if the severity of self-perceived stress is associated with specific FGID and personality characteristics in 822 patients with FGID who have filled a Rome III questionnaire, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI-2), and a 10-point Likert scale for self-perceived stress. According to stress severity, the patients were divided into three groups: low (<4; n = 183), moderate (4-6; n = 283), and severe stress (>6; n = 356). Female sex was more frequent in the severe stress group than in the low stress group (p = 0.001). Stress severity was strongly correlated with the two MMPI-2 posttraumatic stress scales. Clinically, chest pain was more frequently reported by severe stress patients than moderate stress patients. MMPI-2 clinical scales vary significantly according to the severity of stress, and "mild stress" patients have increased hysteria and depression scales and showed a higher frequency of irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea. This study shows that severe stress severity is associated with a higher frequency of noncardiac chest pain and correlated with most personality items.

FODMAP Consumption by Adults from the French Population-Based NutriNet-Santé Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) are increasingly studied because they are suspected unfavorably to impact health (irritable bowel syndrome in particular). However, little is known about FODMAP intake in the general population, or which groups are more likely to consume them, because their intakes are usually assessed in inpatient settings. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe FODMAP consumption in a large French cohort and its association with sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. METHODS: This cross-sectional study described FODMAP intakes in 109,362 volunteers (78.0% female, mean age 43.8 ± 14.7 y) from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort, using an ad hoc FODMAP composition table. Associations between FODMAP intakes and sociodemographic characteristics were investigated using χ2 tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests according to the qualitative or quantitative status of the variable, and multinomial logistic regressions were performed after adjusting for energy intake in sensitivity analyses. Eligible participants had completed ≥3 detailed 24-h food records. RESULTS: We observed a mean intake of 18.9 ± 9.5 g/d FODMAPs in this French cohort, and 11.7% of participants had intakes <9 g/d (i.e., low-FODMAP diets). Participants with FODMAP intakes <9 g/d were more likely to have lower caloric intakes (Δ = 383 kcal/d compared with participants with FODMAP intakes ≥16 g/d), to be smokers, to have lower incomes, and to have lower levels of physical activity. Total FODMAPs accounted for a mean intake of 18.9 ± 9.5 g/d, which was 3.7 ± 2.0% of total energy intake. The highest intake of FODMAPs was represented by lactose followed by excess fructose, fructans, polyols, and galacto-oligo-saccharides. CONCLUSIONS: FODMAP consumption by a large sample of adults from the general population is ∼19 g/d, with half of the population having a FODMAP intake >16 g/d.This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03335644.

Personality of patients with fecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although idiopathic fecal incontinence (FI) patients have some psychological characteristics, the personality of FI patients was not described. The present study aims to describe the clinical and personality characteristics of FI patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 996 outpatients, 72 with fecal incontinence. They filled out the Rome III diagnostic questionnaire, the personality inventory MMPI-2, the questionnaires for urological and sexual disorders, and Likert scales for bowel disorders perceived symptom severity. The main outcome measures were the presence in FI patients of functional gastrointestinal disorders, the self-reported symptom severity, and the personality profile. RESULTS: Patients were mainly females (72%). FI patients were characterized by higher age (P = 0.015), and by a higher prevalence of functional diarrhea (P = 0.001), urological (P = 0.001), and sexual disorders (P = 0.005). These patients also report higher diarrhea severity (P < 0.001) and lower abdominal pain severity (P = 0.009). The personality of FI patients is distinguished by a higher score for psychopathic deviate (P = 0.006), social responsibility (P = 0.003), Mac Andrew revised scale (P = 0.005), and antisocial practice (P = 0.007), and a lower score for type A behavior (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: FI patients are characterized not only by older age, and a high prevalence of diarrhea but also by a specific personality profile characterized by an unfavorable comparison with others.

Characteristics of patients with overlap functional gastrointestinal disorders.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are frequently overlapped. The present study was designed to (i) search the clinical differences between patients with single FGID and overlap FGIDs and (ii) define the most common FGIDs associations to identify homogenous subgroups of patients. METHODS: A total of 3555 outpatients with FGID filled out the Rome III adult diagnostic questionnaire, Bristol stool form, and four 10-point Likert scales to report the severity of constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and abdominal pain. An unsupervised algorithm was used to estimate the number of groups directly from the data. A classification tree separated patients into different subgroups, according to FGIDs. Multinomial logistic regression was used to characterize the groups of patients with overlap disorders. RESULTS: Patients reported 3.3 ± 1.9 FGIDs (range 1-10, median = 3); 736 reported only one FGID, while 2819 reported more than one FGID (3.8 ± 1.7). Patients with single FGID had higher body mass index (P < 0.001), never report irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and rarely report fecal incontinence and anorectal pain (< 1% for each disorder). The non-supervised clustering of the 2819 patients with overlap FGIDs divided this population into 23 groups, including five groups associated with only one disorder (IBS-diarrhea, dysphagia, functional constipation, levator ani syndrome, and IBS-unspecified). Ten groups were related to two overlap disorders and eight groups to three or more disorders. Three disorders were not explicitly associated with a given group: IBS-mixed, proctalgia fugax, and nonspecific anorectal pain. CONCLUSION: Patients with FGID mostly report overlap disorders in a limited number of associations, each significantly associated with a few disorders.

Biopsychosocial Model and Perceived Constipation Severity According to the Constipation Phenotype.

PURPOSE: Constipation is a frequent complaint of patients with functional bowel disorders. The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the perceived constipation severity with demographics, clinical, physiological, and psychological parameters in constipated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred seven constipated patients were included and had clinical, physiological, and psychological evaluation. The self-reported severity of constipation was analyzed using stepwise linear regression in the total population and within each clinical group. RESULTS: The patients were mainly of female gender (81%) and were 47.4 ± 16.5 years old. They complained of IBS (65%), and 62% had defecation disorders. The depression scale was abnormal in 200 patients (49%). The relationships of the constipation severity varied according to the Rome IV phenotype. In all phenotypes, it was positively associated with bloating severity, and negatively with Bristol stool form. In IBS patients, perceived constipation severity was also associated with abdominal pain severity. CONCLUSION: Our data support the hypothesis that perceived constipation severity is associated with clinical and physiological factors but not demographics and psychological factors. Besides, the relationships of perceived constipation severity with these factors vary according to clinical phenotypes.

Data Mining Approach for the Characterization of Functional Bowel Disorders According to Symptom Intensity Provides a Small Number of Homogenous Groups.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of the present study is to evaluate if the intensity of the cardinal symptoms of functional bowel disorders could be used to identify homogenous groups of patients defined by the Rome criteria. METHOD: In this observational study, 1,729 consecutive outpatients (73% females) filled out the Rome III questionnaire and 10-point Likert scales for constipation, diarrhea, bloating (BL)/distension, abdominal pain (AP) during the week before the medical consultation. A Gaussian mixture model was used for clustering the patients according to the intensity of symptoms without a priori information, and a classification tree was constructed from this clustering. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: According to the intensity of symptoms, the patients are divided into 8 groups named according to their main symptomatology: "painful constipation" (PFC), "mild pain constipation" (MPC), "painful diarrhea" (PFD), "mild pain diarrhea" (MPD), "mixed transit" (MT), "BL," "AP," and "nonspecific" (NS). The study of the relationship between the Rome III classification and this new grouping shows that irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-constipation is associated with PFC, IBS-diarrhea with PFD and MPD, SII-mixed with MT, SII-unspecified with BL, functional constipation with PFC and MPC, functional diarrhea with MPD and NS, BL with "BL" and NS, nonspecific functional bowel disorders (FBD) with NS, and functional AP with "BL" and AP (p < 0.01 for all associations). CONCLUSION: A symptom intensity-based classification of FBD patients could simplify clinical phenotype, give homogeneous groups of patients, and could eventually be used by nongastroenterologists and in clinical research.

Association Between Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Results From the French NutriNet-Santé Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Ultra-processed foods (UPF) consumption has increased over the last decades and is raising concerns about potential adverse health effects. Our objective was to assess the association between UPF consumption and four functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs): irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional constipation (FC), functional diarrhea (FDh), and functional dyspepsia (FDy), in a large sample of French adults. METHODS: We analyzed dietary data of 33,343 participants from the web-based NutriNet-Santé cohort, who completed at least three 24 h food records, prior to a Rome III self-administered questionnaire. Proportion (in weight) of UPF in the diet (UPFp) was computed for each subject. The association between UPFp quartiles and FGIDs was estimated by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Participants included in the analysis were mainly women (76.4%), and the mean age was 50.4 (SD = 14.0) years. UPF accounted for 16.0% of food consumed in weight, corresponding to 33.0% of total energy intake. UPF consumption was associated with younger age, living alone, lower incomes, higher BMI, and lower physical activity level (all p < 0.0001). A total of 3516 participants reported IBS (10.5%), 1785 FC (5.4%), 1303 FDy (3.9%), and 396 FDh (1.1%). After adjusting for confounding factors, an increase in UPFp was associated with a higher risk of IBS (aOR Q4 vs. Q1 [95% CI]: 1.25 [1.12-1.39], p-trend < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests an association between UPF and IBS. Further longitudinal studies are needed to confirm those results and understand the relative impact of the nutritional composition and specific characteristics of UPF in this relationship.

Clinical and psychological correlates of soiling in adult patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fecal soiling (FS) is the staining of underwear without loss of significant amounts of fecal material. It is frequently associated with defecation disorders in children. The aim of this study was to search for psychological and clinical correlates of adult patients with soiling. Clinically, the complaint of staining is confused with that of fecal incontinence (FI) in the mind of both patients and attending physicians. DESIGN: Observational study PATIENTS AND METHOD: We included 1454 consecutive outpatients (71% females). They filled out the Rome III questionnaire for functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs); Beck depression inventory, and state and trait anxiety questionnaires; and Likert scales for constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and abdominal pain. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Soiling was found in 123 patients (8.5%). They reported similar frequencies of esophageal, gastroduodenal, and abdominal pain as patients without soiling. In contrast, patients with soiling reported higher prevalence of IBS, such as IBS-Diarrhea, Mixed-IBS, functional diarrhea, functional constipation, and levator ani syndrome, and higher Likert scale for diarrhea, bloating, abdominal pain, and softer stools. The multivariable logistic regression analysis shows that patients with soiling have increased odds to report IBS (P = 0.019; OR = 1.958; 95% CI = [1.118-3.431]), functional diarrhea (P = 0.040; OR = 1.901; 95% CI = [1.028-3.513]), and high Diarrhea Likert scale (P < 0.001; OR = 1.215; 95% CI = [1.130-1.306]). No association was found with psychological evaluation. CONCLUSION: In FGID patients, soiling is not associated with psychological disorders and is mainly associated with IBS and functional diarrhea.

Change of appetite in patients with functional digestive disorder. Association with psychological disorders: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Changes in appetite are a frequent complaint in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). The aims of this study are to evaluate whether the changes in appetite are associated with specific FGIDs and to explore associations of these changes with symptoms of anxiety or depression. METHODS: This study included 1009 consecutive FGID patients (71% female), aged 48.9 years who all filled out a Rome III questionnaire for the evaluation of FGIDs, submitted to a psychological evaluation of symptoms of anxiety, and completed the Beck Depression Inventory questionnaire. The patients were classified according to their appetite change using a 7-point grading scale and split into three groups: those with appetite loss, those with no change in appetite, and those with increased appetite. RESULTS: Among the 1009, 496 patients (49%) reported a change in appetite, of which 332 (33%) patients reported a decrease in appetite and 164 (16%) patients reported an increase in appetite. Appetite was not affected in 51% of patients. Changes in appetite depended on gender, body mass index and psychometric evaluation scores. Increased appetite did not have specific FGIDs associations, while decreased appetite was associated with esophageal, gastroduodenal, bowel, and anorectal symptoms. The presence of depressive symptoms was also a predictor for the majority of FGIDs in decreased appetite, while anxiety trait was significant for globus and dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased appetite was associated with FGIDs, especially in the presence of depressive symptoms. A reduced appetite would help to predict psychological disorders associated with FGIDs. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None declared. LEGAL REGISTRATION: This study was a registered study in the French National Drug Agency (ANSM, Agence Nationale de Securité du Medicamentet des produits de santé, Study Number 2016-A01120-51). COMPETING INTERESTS: Michel Bouchoucha, Marinos Fysekidis, Florence Mary, Gheorghe Airinei, Cyriaque Bon, and Robert Benamouzig have no competitive interests.

Painful or Mild-Pain Constipation? A Clinically Useful Alternative to Classification as Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation Versus Functional Constipation.

PURPOSE: Abdominal pain is not used to characterize constipated patients. This study aimed to compare clinical, psychological, and physiological features in patients with IBS-constipation (IBS-C) with those in patients with functional constipation (FC) according to the intensity of abdominal pain. METHODS: All patients filled a standard Rome III questionnaire. In addition, they indicated the intensity of constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and abdominal pain on a 10-point Likert scale, and their stool form with the Bristol Stool Form Scale. Anxiety and depression were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Physiological evaluation included anorectal manometry and total and segmental colonic transit time. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 546 consecutive patients, 245 with IBS-C and 301 with FC, were included. Painful constipation (PFC) was found by cluster analysis and subsequently defined as having a value over four on the Likert scale for abdominal pain. PFC was found in 67% of IBS-C patients and in 22% of FC patients. PFC patients have digestive disorders with greater frequency and report higher levels of constipation and bloating, despite similar stool form. They have higher scores of depression, state and trait anxiety, and shorter terminal transit time than mild-pain constipated patients. Compared to IBS-C patients, PFC patients report higher levels of abdominal pain (P < 0.001). Psychological and physiological parameters were similar in PFC and IBS-C patients. CONCLUSION: Painful constipation and mild-pain constipation could be an alternative way to identify constipated patients than using the diagnosis of IBS-C and FC for clinical evaluation and drug studies.

Difficult defecation in constipated patients and its relationship to colonic disorders.

BACKGROUND: The importance in constipated subjects of having difficult defecation is poorly known. According to the Rome III criteria, constipated patients are classified as having either irritable bowel syndrome with constipation or functional constipation, depending on the presence and characteristics of abdominal pain. But, the Rome III criteria also identify another group of patients, labeled as suffering from functional anorectal disorders. Within this group, two complaints are akin to being constipated, but not labeled so: having dyssynergic defecation or inadequate defecation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to search for an association between difficult defecation and colonic transit abnormalities in constipated patients and, thus, shed some light on the definition of constipation according to the Rome III criteria. PATIENTS: Four hundred four consecutive patients (81% female), aged 44.9 ± 16.6 years, with a BMI of 25.5 ± 6.4 kg/m(2) (mean ± SD), suffering from chronic constipation were included in the present study. After filling out a standard Rome III questionnaire, patients were classified as suffering from an irritable bowel syndrome with constipation or functional constipation. In addition, they were classified as complaining of difficult defecation or not. Patients completed the Bristol Stool Form Scale as well as visual analogue scales for constipation, bloating, and abdominal pain. The colonic transit time was measured using radiopaque markers and analyzed according to three sites: the right colon, the left colon, and the rectosigmoid area. RESULTS: Difficult defecation is more frequent in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (84%) than in patients with functional constipation (68%). It is associated with an increase in constipation and abdominal pain scores on Likert scales, and a longer oroanal transit time, due to a delay in the left part of the colon. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that difficult defecation is part of a more generalized colorectal dysfunction in both irritable bowel syndrome and in functional constipation patients with an overlap of symptomatology. It also demonstrates the relative inadequacy of the Rome III criteria to describe the relationship between constipation and difficult defecation.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prucalopride in men with chronic constipation.

OBJECTIVES: Prucalopride is effective at alleviating symptoms of chronic constipation in women. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of 12 weeks of prucalopride treatment compared with placebo in men with chronic constipation. METHODS: This was a multicenter, stratified, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01147926). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a mean of three or more spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBMs) per week across the treatment period. Efficacy end points were assessed using daily electronic diaries, global assessment of the severity of constipation and efficacy of treatment, and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM) and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaires. RESULTS: In total, 374 patients were enrolled in the study. Significantly more patients achieved a mean of three or more SCBMs per week in the prucalopride group (37.9%) than in the placebo group (17.7%, P<0.0001). The proportion of patients rating their constipation treatment as "quite a bit" to "extremely" effective at the final on-treatment visit was 46.7 and 30.4% in the prucalopride and placebo groups, respectively. The difference between treatment groups was statistically significant (P<0.0001). The proportion of patients with an improvement of at least 1 point in PAC-QOL satisfaction subscale score was 52.7 and 38.8% in the prucalopride and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.0035). Prucalopride had a good safety profile and was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Prucalopride is effective, has a good safety profile, and is well tolerated for the treatment of men with chronic constipation.

How many segments are necessary to characterize delayed colonic transit time?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Measuring colonic transit time with radiopaque markers is simple, inexpensive, and very useful in constipated patients. Yet, the algorithm used to identify colonic segments is subjective, rather than founded on prior experimentation. The aim of the present study is to describe a rational way to determine the colonic partition in the measurement of colonic transit time. METHODS: Colonic transit time was measured in seven segments: ascending colon, hepatic flexure, right and left transverse colon, splenic flexure, descending colon, and rectosigmoid in 852 patients with functional bowel and anorectal disorders. An unsupervised algorithm for modeling Gaussian mixtures served to estimate the number of subgroups from this oversegmented colonic transit time. After that, we performed a k-means clustering that separated the observations into homogenous groups of patients according to their oversegmented colonic transit time. RESULTS: The Gaussian mixture followed by the k-means clustering defined 4 populations of patients: "normal and fast transit" (n = 548) and three groups of patients with delayed colonic transit time "right delay" (n = 82) in which transit is delayed in the right part of the colon, "left delay" (n = 87) with transit delayed in the left part of colon and "outlet constipation" (n = 135) for patients with transit delayed in the terminal intestine. Only 3.7 % of patients were "erroneously" classified in the 4 groups recognized by clustering. CONCLUSIONS: This unsupervised analysis of segmental colonic transit time shows that the classical division of the colon and the rectum into three segments is sufficient to characterize delayed segmental colonic transit time.

Changes of lipid and fatty acid absorption induced by high dose of citric acid ester and lecithin emulsifiers.

AIMS: To describe the effect of two food emulsifiers, lecithin (E322) and citric acid esters of mono-and diglycerides of fatty acids (E472c), on the intestinal absorption of lipids. METHODS: The experiment was conducted on 24 male Wistar rats randomly assigned in three groups. For two groups of six rats, 30% of the lipid intake was replaced with lecithin (L) or citric acid ester of mono and diglycerides, (E); the remaining 12 rats were the control group (C). Diet and fecal fat analysis was used to determine the apparent lipid absorption (ALA) and fatty acids. RESULTS: ALA was significantly lower in the group E than in the groups C and L (p < 0.001). ALA of long saturated chain fatty acids decreased while the length of the carbon chains increased, and this decrease was higher in the group E. CONCLUSION: E472c emulsifier decreased the intestinal absorption of lipids.

Relationship Between Colonic Transit Response to Eating With Self-reported Constipation Severity in Constipated Patients According to the Phenotype.

Background/Aims: Eating is the major synchronizer of gastrointestinal motility and secretions. The present study aims to evaluate the interplay between self-perceived constipation severity (CS) and colonic response to eating in constipated patients according to the phenotype. Methods: We included 387 consecutive outpatients complaining of Rome IV chronic idiopathic constipation. Likert scales for CS, abdominal pain severity, bloating severity, depression and anxiety assessment, total and segmental colonic transit time (CTT), and colonic transit response to eating (CTRE) were performed in all patients. Results: Of the 387 patients included (49.7 ± 16.4 years), 320 (83%) were female, 203 had irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C), 184 as functional constipation (FC), and 283 had defecation disorders (DD). The female gender was characterized by increased bloating severity (P = 0.011) and decreased Bristol stool form (P = 0.002). In IBS-C and FC patients, CS was related with bloating severity (P < 0.001 in both groups) and total CTT (P = 0.007 in IBS-constipation, P = 0.040 in FC). In IBS-C patients, CS was also associated with abdominal pain severity (P = 0.003) and Bristol stool form (P = 0.004). In contrast, in FC, CS was only related to left CTRE (P = 0.006), and in patients with DD, CS was associated with total CTT (P < 0.001) and left CTRE (P = 0.002). Conclusion: Colonic transit response to eating was not associated to CS in IBS-C patients, but left CTRE was associated with constipation severity in FC and DD patients.

A Retrospective Real-World Observational Study Assessing the Evolution of Bisacodyl Prescriptions in Patients with Constipation During Long-Term Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Potential habituation could be a safety concern associated with the long-term use of bisacodyl in patients with constipation. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated whether patients with constipation who require long-term treatment with bisacodyl will remain on a stable dose when treated for ≥ 28 days. METHODS: In this retrospective, population-based, observational cohort study, electronic medical record data of adult patients with constipation between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019, were collected from The Health Improvement Network French database. Total bisacodyl exposure during the long-term (≥ 28 days) and follow-up (12 months) periods was evaluated. The primary endpoint was the dose change status of bisacodyl during the follow-up period from the initial dose in the long-term cohort. RESULTS: Out of 5725 bisacodyl users in the database, 218 patients qualified to be part of the long-term cohort. A total of 166 (76.1%), 37 (17%), and 15 (6.9%) patients were initiated on bisacodyl at 5, 7.5, and 10 mg, respectively. During the follow-up, most (94%) of the patients remained on the same dose as initially prescribed for the first year. In contrast, only seven (3.2%) patients had their dose increased (from the initial prescribed dose of 5 mg), and the remaining six (2.8%) patients decreased their dose (four patients from the 7.5 mg group and two from the 10 mg group). CONCLUSION: Bisacodyl can be prescribed at a stable dose for > 28 days as most patients remained on their initial prescribed dose during the follow-up period. No signs of habituation were observed in this real-world study.

Is the colonic response to food different in IBS in contrast to simple constipation or diarrhea without abdominal pain?

BACKGROUND: Colonic response to food (CRF) is abnormal in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare CRF in patients who complain of abnormal defecation pattern according to the presence or absence of abdominal pain. METHODS: One hundred forty-nine patients and 50 controls were studied: 96 IBS patients (46 IBS-C, 13 IBS-D, 15 IBS-M, and 22 IBS-U not included), 43 patients with functional constipation (group C) and ten with functional diarrhea (group D). Clinical evaluation and visual analog scales about four items (constipation, diarrhea, abdominal bloating and abdominal pain) were filled by all subjects. Colonic transit time (CTT) was measured in fasting conditions and after eating a standard 1,000-cal test meal. CRF was quantified by calculating the variation in number of markers between the two films. RESULTS: The frequency of meal-related symptoms did not vary among the different groups of patients but was significantly higher than in controls. Compared to IBS-C patients, constipated patients of the group C had longer total and segmental colonic transit time, and compared to IBS-D patients, diarrheic patients of the group D had shorter oro-anal and segmental colonic transit time except in the recto-sigmoid area. CRF was different in patients and controls, and differed between IBS and non IBS patients with similar transit abnormalities. Stool output was greater in patients of the group D than in patients of the IBS-D group. CONCLUSION: The different subgroups of IBS patients have different CRF patterns, distinct from subjects with constipation and diarrhea, but without abdominal pain.

Lactose Sensitivity and Lactose Malabsorption: The 2 Faces of Lactose Intolerance.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Self-reported lactose intolerance (LI) is frequent in patients with functional bowel disorders (FBD) that could be interpreted as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The present study aims to characterize the responses of patients with FBD, without small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), and LI, in terms of lactose malabsorption (LM) and lactose sensitivity (LS) according to psychological and clinical features. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-eight consecutive FBD outpatients with LI, and no SIBO, were classified according to the Rome III questionnaire and filled Beck Depression Inventory, and State and Trait Anxiety questionnaires. They underwent a lactose tolerance test in which glycemia during 60 minutes and digestive symptoms for 3 hours were recorded. RESULTS: Abnormal lactose tolerance tests were found in 110 patients (70%), 44 (28%) with LM, 96 (61%) with LS, and 30 (19%) having both LM and LS. LM patients had a higher frequency of functional diarrhea (P = 0.040) and a lower frequency of dysphagia (P = 0.031). LS patients had a higher depression score (P = 0.007), higher frequency of globus (P = 0.042), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (P = 0.027) and mixed IBS (P = 0.049), and lower frequency of abdominal pain (P = 0.040). LS was significantly associated with a higher depression score (P = 0.002), and a higher frequency of globus (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty percent of LI patients have normal lactose absorption and normal LS. In the other 70% of patients, LI could be associated with LM and/or LS.

Functional gastrointestinal disorders as predictors of suicidal ideation. An observational study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Suicidal ideation (SI), a symptom of depression, is known to be associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) but is not known to be associated with other functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). However, the source of this association is discussed. It could be related to a possible abnormal biochemical pathway implicating neurotransmitters common to both disorders like serotonin or pain and an ill-being associated with a chronic disorder of unknown etiology. The present study aims to search for the FGIDs associated with suicidal ideation. DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: A total of 1469 patients with FGIDs (71% of women) were included in the present study. They filled the Rome III questionnaire, Beck depression inventory, and state and trait anxiety questionnaires. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Suicidal ideation was reported by 15% of patients, associated with increased scales of depression (P < 0.001), state (P = 0.006), and trait anxiety (P = 0.021). Clinically, these patients reported a higher prevalence of IBS-diarrhea subtype (P = 0.045), fecal incontinence (P = 0.020), soiling (P = 0.016), and difficult defecation (P = 0.005), and higher perceived severity for constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and abdominal pain (P < 0.001 for all scales). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that only functional bowel and functional anorectal disorders are associated with suicidal ideation. This result must be taken into account in the management of these patients.